Clinical discrimination between autoglazed and polished porcelain surfaces
Identifieur interne : 00B889 ( Main/Curation ); précédent : 00B888; suivant : 00B890Clinical discrimination between autoglazed and polished porcelain surfaces
Auteurs : Jane D. Brewer [États-Unis] ; Davis A. Garlapo [États-Unis] ; Edward A. Chipps [États-Unis] ; Lisa A. Tedesco [États-Unis]Source :
- The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry [ 0022-3913 ] ; 1990.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abraded, Autoglazed, Brewer, Crown, Dent, Different methods, Dullness, Elastomer, Evaluation form, Evaluator groups, Excess bulk, Inaccurate impression, Likert scales, Outline form, Outline form sharpness, Porcelain, Porcelain surface, Porcelain surfaces, Porosity, Prostaet dent, Prosthetic dentistry, Prosthodontics, Prosthodontist, Provisional restoration, Putty, Putty impression, Reflectance, Sharpness, Significant differences, Silicone elastomers, Standard deviations, Surface porosity, Surface smoothness, Surface treatments, Uniform wash space, Visual inspection differences, Wash material.
- Teeft :
- Abraded, Autoglazed, Brewer, Crown, Dent, Different methods, Dullness, Elastomer, Evaluation form, Evaluator groups, Excess bulk, Inaccurate impression, Likert scales, Outline form, Outline form sharpness, Porcelain, Porcelain surface, Porcelain surfaces, Porosity, Prostaet dent, Prosthetic dentistry, Prosthodontics, Prosthodontist, Provisional restoration, Putty, Putty impression, Reflectance, Sharpness, Significant differences, Silicone elastomers, Standard deviations, Surface porosity, Surface smoothness, Surface treatments, Uniform wash space, Visual inspection differences, Wash material.
Abstract
Abstract: Precementation refinements of porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns often require reglazing or polishing of the porcelain surface. This study was done to determine whether visual inspection differences exist between glazed and polished porcelain surfaces. Prosthodontists, general dentists, and students (six in each group) rated esthetic properties of 12 porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns. All crowns were initially autoglazed. For phase 1 observations, six crowns were air abraded and polished and six retained their glazed surface. For phase 2 observations, the surface treatments were reversed. At both observations, crowns were rated on 5-point Likert scales for outline form, porosity, smoothness, reflectance, texture, dullness, defects, and general esthetic appearances. Phase 1 polished and glazed crowns had different means for outline form sharpness, porosity, reflectance, dullness, and general esthetic appearance. Phase 2 crowns were different for dullness. Polished and glazed crowns alike were more dull at phase 1 than at phase 2. Glazed crowns were different between phases for reflectance and general esthetic apperance. All reported differences were significant at p <.01. Significant differences occurred among raters with polished and glazed crowns for several variables.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90284-J
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :005B28
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :005B28
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :005670
- to stream Main, to step Merge: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :00C020
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:B72E6E5934AC7E8201B2AA85F19B72B569852A6CLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>Clinical discrimination between autoglazed and polished porcelain surfaces</title>
<author><name sortKey="Brewer, Jane D" sort="Brewer, Jane D" uniqKey="Brewer J" first="Jane D." last="Brewer">Jane D. Brewer</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Garlapo, Davis A" sort="Garlapo, Davis A" uniqKey="Garlapo D" first="Davis A." last="Garlapo">Davis A. Garlapo</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Chipps, Edward A" sort="Chipps, Edward A" uniqKey="Chipps E" first="Edward A." last="Chipps">Edward A. Chipps</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Tedesco, Lisa A" sort="Tedesco, Lisa A" uniqKey="Tedesco L" first="Lisa A." last="Tedesco">Lisa A. Tedesco</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:B72E6E5934AC7E8201B2AA85F19B72B569852A6C</idno>
<date when="1990" year="1990">1990</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/0022-3913(90)90284-J</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/B72E6E5934AC7E8201B2AA85F19B72B569852A6C/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">005B28</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">005B28</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">005B28</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">005670</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">005670</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0022-3913:1990:Brewer J:clinical:discrimination:between</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">00C020</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">00B889</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">Clinical discrimination between autoglazed and polished porcelain surfaces</title>
<author><name sortKey="Brewer, Jane D" sort="Brewer, Jane D" uniqKey="Brewer J" first="Jane D." last="Brewer">Jane D. Brewer</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>State University of New York at Buffalo, School of Dental Medicine, Buffalo</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Buffalo</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Garlapo, Davis A" sort="Garlapo, Davis A" uniqKey="Garlapo D" first="Davis A." last="Garlapo">Davis A. Garlapo</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>State University of New York at Buffalo, School of Dental Medicine, Buffalo</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Buffalo</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Chipps, Edward A" sort="Chipps, Edward A" uniqKey="Chipps E" first="Edward A." last="Chipps">Edward A. Chipps</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>State University of New York at Buffalo, School of Dental Medicine, Buffalo</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Buffalo</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Tedesco, Lisa A" sort="Tedesco, Lisa A" uniqKey="Tedesco L" first="Lisa A." last="Tedesco">Lisa A. Tedesco</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>State University of New York at Buffalo, School of Dental Medicine, Buffalo</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Buffalo</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j">The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">YMPR</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno>
<imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<date type="published" when="1990">1990</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">64</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="631">631</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="635">635</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abraded</term>
<term>Autoglazed</term>
<term>Brewer</term>
<term>Crown</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Different methods</term>
<term>Dullness</term>
<term>Elastomer</term>
<term>Evaluation form</term>
<term>Evaluator groups</term>
<term>Excess bulk</term>
<term>Inaccurate impression</term>
<term>Likert scales</term>
<term>Outline form</term>
<term>Outline form sharpness</term>
<term>Porcelain</term>
<term>Porcelain surface</term>
<term>Porcelain surfaces</term>
<term>Porosity</term>
<term>Prostaet dent</term>
<term>Prosthetic dentistry</term>
<term>Prosthodontics</term>
<term>Prosthodontist</term>
<term>Provisional restoration</term>
<term>Putty</term>
<term>Putty impression</term>
<term>Reflectance</term>
<term>Sharpness</term>
<term>Significant differences</term>
<term>Silicone elastomers</term>
<term>Standard deviations</term>
<term>Surface porosity</term>
<term>Surface smoothness</term>
<term>Surface treatments</term>
<term>Uniform wash space</term>
<term>Visual inspection differences</term>
<term>Wash material</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abraded</term>
<term>Autoglazed</term>
<term>Brewer</term>
<term>Crown</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Different methods</term>
<term>Dullness</term>
<term>Elastomer</term>
<term>Evaluation form</term>
<term>Evaluator groups</term>
<term>Excess bulk</term>
<term>Inaccurate impression</term>
<term>Likert scales</term>
<term>Outline form</term>
<term>Outline form sharpness</term>
<term>Porcelain</term>
<term>Porcelain surface</term>
<term>Porcelain surfaces</term>
<term>Porosity</term>
<term>Prostaet dent</term>
<term>Prosthetic dentistry</term>
<term>Prosthodontics</term>
<term>Prosthodontist</term>
<term>Provisional restoration</term>
<term>Putty</term>
<term>Putty impression</term>
<term>Reflectance</term>
<term>Sharpness</term>
<term>Significant differences</term>
<term>Silicone elastomers</term>
<term>Standard deviations</term>
<term>Surface porosity</term>
<term>Surface smoothness</term>
<term>Surface treatments</term>
<term>Uniform wash space</term>
<term>Visual inspection differences</term>
<term>Wash material</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: Precementation refinements of porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns often require reglazing or polishing of the porcelain surface. This study was done to determine whether visual inspection differences exist between glazed and polished porcelain surfaces. Prosthodontists, general dentists, and students (six in each group) rated esthetic properties of 12 porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns. All crowns were initially autoglazed. For phase 1 observations, six crowns were air abraded and polished and six retained their glazed surface. For phase 2 observations, the surface treatments were reversed. At both observations, crowns were rated on 5-point Likert scales for outline form, porosity, smoothness, reflectance, texture, dullness, defects, and general esthetic appearances. Phase 1 polished and glazed crowns had different means for outline form sharpness, porosity, reflectance, dullness, and general esthetic appearance. Phase 2 crowns were different for dullness. Polished and glazed crowns alike were more dull at phase 1 than at phase 2. Glazed crowns were different between phases for reflectance and general esthetic apperance. All reported differences were significant at p <.01. Significant differences occurred among raters with polished and glazed crowns for several variables.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 00B889 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 00B889 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= Main |étape= Curation |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:B72E6E5934AC7E8201B2AA85F19B72B569852A6C |texte= Clinical discrimination between autoglazed and polished porcelain surfaces }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. | ![]() |