Effectiveness of three treatment modalities for the edentulous mandible
Identifieur interne : 008F46 ( Main/Curation ); précédent : 008F45; suivant : 008F47Effectiveness of three treatment modalities for the edentulous mandible
Auteurs : Gerry M. Raghoebar [Pays-Bas] ; Henny J. A. Meijer [Pays-Bas] ; Boudewijn Stegenga [Pays-Bas] ; Martin A. Van'T Hof [Pays-Bas] ; Rob P. Van Oort [Pays-Bas] ; Arjan Vissink [Pays-Bas]Source :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2000-06.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Adulte d'âge moyen, Analyse de variance, Enquêtes et questionnaires, Femelle, Humains, Mastication, Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation), Mâle, Overdenture, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux, Prothèse dentaire complète inférieure, Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée, Résultat thérapeutique, Satisfaction du patient, Statistique non paramétrique, Vestibuloplastie, Études prospectives.
- MESH :
- rééducation et réadaptation : Mâchoire édentée.
- Adulte d'âge moyen, Analyse de variance, Enquêtes et questionnaires, Femelle, Humains, Mastication, Mâle, Overdenture, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux, Prothèse dentaire complète inférieure, Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée, Résultat thérapeutique, Satisfaction du patient, Statistique non paramétrique, Vestibuloplastie, Études prospectives.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Ability questionnaire, Analysis of Variance, Avec ancrage, Better scores, Clinical trials, Complete denture, Complete denture wearers, Complete dentures, Control group, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental implants, Dental research, Denture, Denture complaints, Denture complaints questionnaire, Denture satisfaction, Denture, Complete, Lower, Denture, Overlay, Edentulous, Edentulous mandible, Edentulous patients, Edentulous period, Endosseous, Endosseous implants, Este estudio, Female, General anaesthesia, Hard food, Healing period, Humans, Implant, Implants research, International journal, Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Longitudinal study, Lower denture, Male, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular height, Mandibular overdenture, Mandibular overdentures, Mastication, Masticatory performance, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial implants, Maxillofacial prosthodontics, Maxillofacial surgery, Meticulous construction, Middle Aged, Modality, Nach, Nuevo juego, Oral implantology, Osseointegrated implants, Other items, Overall denture satisfaction, Overall denture satisfaction rating, Overdenture, Overdentures, Patient Satisfaction, Patient satisfaction, Preprosthetic, Preprosthetic surgery, Prospective Studies, Prosthetic dentistry, Prothese, Prothese amovible, Protheses amovibles, Protocol analysis, Raghoebar, Randomized, Rating scale, Satisfaction rate, Satisfaction rates, Satisfaction scores, Score complaints, Score problems, Score satisfaction rate, Sensory changes, Standard treatment, Standardized procedure, Statistics, Nonparametric, Surveys and Questionnaires, Tough food, Treatment Outcome, Treatment modalities, Treatment options, University hospital groningen, Upper denture, Vestibuloplasty.
- MESH :
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous.
- Teeft :
- Ability questionnaire, Analysis of Variance, Avec ancrage, Better scores, Clinical trials, Complete denture, Complete denture wearers, Complete dentures, Control group, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental implants, Dental research, Denture, Denture complaints, Denture complaints questionnaire, Denture satisfaction, Denture, Complete, Lower, Denture, Overlay, Edentulous, Edentulous mandible, Edentulous patients, Edentulous period, Endosseous, Endosseous implants, Este estudio, Female, General anaesthesia, Hard food, Healing period, Humans, Implant, Implants research, International journal, Longitudinal study, Lower denture, Male, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular height, Mandibular overdenture, Mandibular overdentures, Mastication, Masticatory performance, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial implants, Maxillofacial prosthodontics, Maxillofacial surgery, Meticulous construction, Middle Aged, Modality, Nach, Nuevo juego, Oral implantology, Osseointegrated implants, Other items, Overall denture satisfaction, Overall denture satisfaction rating, Overdenture, Overdentures, Patient Satisfaction, Patient satisfaction, Preprosthetic, Preprosthetic surgery, Prospective Studies, Prosthetic dentistry, Prothese, Prothese amovible, Protheses amovibles, Protocol analysis, Raghoebar, Randomized, Rating scale, Satisfaction rate, Satisfaction rates, Satisfaction scores, Score complaints, Score problems, Score satisfaction rate, Sensory changes, Standard treatment, Standardized procedure, Statistics, Nonparametric, Surveys and Questionnaires, Tough food, Treatment Outcome, Treatment modalities, Treatment options, University hospital groningen, Upper denture, Vestibuloplasty.
Abstract
Currently, 3 treatment options are available for patients with denture complaints and an edentulous mandible with a height of at least 15 mm: meticulous construction of a new set of dentures (CD), construction of a new set of dentures following preprosthetic surgery to enlarge the denture‐bearing area (PPS), and construction of an implant‐retained mandibular overdenture (IRO). The aim of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction and subjective chewing ability of edentulous patients treated with one of these treatment modalities. Ninety edentulous patients (Cawood class IV and V, mean mandibular height 20.7 mm) were randomly assigned to receive 1 of these 3 groups. Denture satisfaction and chewing ability were assessed using questionnaires focusing on denture‐related complaints and problems chewing different types of food were assessed before treatment, and 1‐ and 5‐years after treatment. At the 1‐year evaluation, significantly better scores were observed in the 2 surgical groups (IRO, PPS) than in the CD group. At 5‐year evaluation the “complaints of the lower denture” showed a significantly better score in the IRO group when compared to the PPS and CD groups. No significant differences were observed between the PPS and CD group. From this study it is concluded that both in the short and long term denture satisfaction appears most favourable in the IRO group when compared to the PPS and CD groups. Implant‐retained overdentures are therefore a satisfactory treatment modality for edentulous patients with problems with their lower denture, even in cases of not severely resorbed mandibles.
Url:
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011003195.x
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :002C81
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :002C81
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :003F90
- to stream Main, to step Merge: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :009331
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :003693
- to stream PubMed, to step Curation: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :003693
- to stream PubMed, to step Checkpoint: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :003693
- to stream Ncbi, to step Merge: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000471
- to stream Ncbi, to step Curation: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000471
- to stream Ncbi, to step Checkpoint: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000471
- to stream Main, to step Merge: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :009023
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:5AEC8879D94564E2C7FE12BCACF1F5F0BA477778Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Effectiveness of three treatment modalities for the edentulous mandible</title>
<author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, Gerry M" sort="Raghoebar, Gerry M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="Gerry M." last="Raghoebar">Gerry M. Raghoebar</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Meijer, Henny J A" sort="Meijer, Henny J A" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="Henny J. A." last="Meijer">Henny J. A. Meijer</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Stegenga, Boudewijn" sort="Stegenga, Boudewijn" uniqKey="Stegenga B" first="Boudewijn" last="Stegenga">Boudewijn Stegenga</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van T Hof, Martin A" sort="Van T Hof, Martin A" uniqKey="Van T Hof M" first="Martin A." last="Van'T Hof">Martin A. Van'T Hof</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van Oort, Rob P" sort="Van Oort, Rob P" uniqKey="Van Oort R" first="Rob P." last="Van Oort">Rob P. Van Oort</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Vissink, Arjan" sort="Vissink, Arjan" uniqKey="Vissink A" first="Arjan" last="Vissink">Arjan Vissink</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:5AEC8879D94564E2C7FE12BCACF1F5F0BA477778</idno>
<date when="2000" year="2000">2000</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011003195.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/5AEC8879D94564E2C7FE12BCACF1F5F0BA477778/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002C81</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002C81</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">002C81</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">003F90</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">003F90</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0905-7161:2000:Raghoebar G:effectiveness:of:three</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">009331</idno>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:11168210</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">003693</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003693</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">003693</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">003693</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">003693</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">003693</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">000471</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">000471</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">000471</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0905-7161:2000:Raghoebar G:effectiveness:of:three</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">009023</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">008F46</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Effectiveness of three treatment modalities for the edentulous mandible</title>
<author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, Gerry M" sort="Raghoebar, Gerry M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="Gerry M." last="Raghoebar">Gerry M. Raghoebar</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>University Hospital Groningen</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Meijer, Henny J A" sort="Meijer, Henny J A" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="Henny J. A." last="Meijer">Henny J. A. Meijer</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>University Hospital Groningen</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Stegenga, Boudewijn" sort="Stegenga, Boudewijn" uniqKey="Stegenga B" first="Boudewijn" last="Stegenga">Boudewijn Stegenga</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>University Hospital Groningen</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van T Hof, Martin A" sort="Van T Hof, Martin A" uniqKey="Van T Hof M" first="Martin A." last="Van'T Hof">Martin A. Van'T Hof</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Medical Statistics, University of Nijmegen</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>University of Nijmegen</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van Oort, Rob P" sort="Van Oort, Rob P" uniqKey="Van Oort R" first="Rob P." last="Van Oort">Rob P. Van Oort</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>University Hospital Groningen</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Vissink, Arjan" sort="Vissink, Arjan" uniqKey="Vissink A" first="Arjan" last="Vissink">Arjan Vissink</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>University Hospital Groningen</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">11</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="195">195</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="201">201</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope>
<publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher>
<pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2000-06">2000-06</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Ability questionnaire</term>
<term>Analysis of Variance</term>
<term>Avec ancrage</term>
<term>Better scores</term>
<term>Clinical trials</term>
<term>Complete denture</term>
<term>Complete denture wearers</term>
<term>Complete dentures</term>
<term>Control group</term>
<term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term>
<term>Dental implants</term>
<term>Dental research</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Denture complaints</term>
<term>Denture complaints questionnaire</term>
<term>Denture satisfaction</term>
<term>Denture, Complete, Lower</term>
<term>Denture, Overlay</term>
<term>Edentulous</term>
<term>Edentulous mandible</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Edentulous period</term>
<term>Endosseous</term>
<term>Endosseous implants</term>
<term>Este estudio</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>General anaesthesia</term>
<term>Hard food</term>
<term>Healing period</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implants research</term>
<term>International journal</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term>
<term>Longitudinal study</term>
<term>Lower denture</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Mandibular height</term>
<term>Mandibular overdenture</term>
<term>Mandibular overdentures</term>
<term>Mastication</term>
<term>Masticatory performance</term>
<term>Maxillofacial</term>
<term>Maxillofacial implants</term>
<term>Maxillofacial prosthodontics</term>
<term>Maxillofacial surgery</term>
<term>Meticulous construction</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Modality</term>
<term>Nach</term>
<term>Nuevo juego</term>
<term>Oral implantology</term>
<term>Osseointegrated implants</term>
<term>Other items</term>
<term>Overall denture satisfaction</term>
<term>Overall denture satisfaction rating</term>
<term>Overdenture</term>
<term>Overdentures</term>
<term>Patient Satisfaction</term>
<term>Patient satisfaction</term>
<term>Preprosthetic</term>
<term>Preprosthetic surgery</term>
<term>Prospective Studies</term>
<term>Prosthetic dentistry</term>
<term>Prothese</term>
<term>Prothese amovible</term>
<term>Protheses amovibles</term>
<term>Protocol analysis</term>
<term>Raghoebar</term>
<term>Randomized</term>
<term>Rating scale</term>
<term>Satisfaction rate</term>
<term>Satisfaction rates</term>
<term>Satisfaction scores</term>
<term>Score complaints</term>
<term>Score problems</term>
<term>Score satisfaction rate</term>
<term>Sensory changes</term>
<term>Standard treatment</term>
<term>Standardized procedure</term>
<term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term>
<term>Surveys and Questionnaires</term>
<term>Tough food</term>
<term>Treatment Outcome</term>
<term>Treatment modalities</term>
<term>Treatment options</term>
<term>University hospital groningen</term>
<term>Upper denture</term>
<term>Vestibuloplasty</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Analyse de variance</term>
<term>Enquêtes et questionnaires</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Mastication</term>
<term>Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Overdenture</term>
<term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term>
<term>Prothèse dentaire complète inférieure</term>
<term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term>
<term>Résultat thérapeutique</term>
<term>Satisfaction du patient</term>
<term>Statistique non paramétrique</term>
<term>Vestibuloplastie</term>
<term>Études prospectives</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire édentée</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Ability questionnaire</term>
<term>Analysis of Variance</term>
<term>Avec ancrage</term>
<term>Better scores</term>
<term>Clinical trials</term>
<term>Complete denture</term>
<term>Complete denture wearers</term>
<term>Complete dentures</term>
<term>Control group</term>
<term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term>
<term>Dental implants</term>
<term>Dental research</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Denture complaints</term>
<term>Denture complaints questionnaire</term>
<term>Denture satisfaction</term>
<term>Denture, Complete, Lower</term>
<term>Denture, Overlay</term>
<term>Edentulous</term>
<term>Edentulous mandible</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Edentulous period</term>
<term>Endosseous</term>
<term>Endosseous implants</term>
<term>Este estudio</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>General anaesthesia</term>
<term>Hard food</term>
<term>Healing period</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implants research</term>
<term>International journal</term>
<term>Longitudinal study</term>
<term>Lower denture</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Mandibular height</term>
<term>Mandibular overdenture</term>
<term>Mandibular overdentures</term>
<term>Mastication</term>
<term>Masticatory performance</term>
<term>Maxillofacial</term>
<term>Maxillofacial implants</term>
<term>Maxillofacial prosthodontics</term>
<term>Maxillofacial surgery</term>
<term>Meticulous construction</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Modality</term>
<term>Nach</term>
<term>Nuevo juego</term>
<term>Oral implantology</term>
<term>Osseointegrated implants</term>
<term>Other items</term>
<term>Overall denture satisfaction</term>
<term>Overall denture satisfaction rating</term>
<term>Overdenture</term>
<term>Overdentures</term>
<term>Patient Satisfaction</term>
<term>Patient satisfaction</term>
<term>Preprosthetic</term>
<term>Preprosthetic surgery</term>
<term>Prospective Studies</term>
<term>Prosthetic dentistry</term>
<term>Prothese</term>
<term>Prothese amovible</term>
<term>Protheses amovibles</term>
<term>Protocol analysis</term>
<term>Raghoebar</term>
<term>Randomized</term>
<term>Rating scale</term>
<term>Satisfaction rate</term>
<term>Satisfaction rates</term>
<term>Satisfaction scores</term>
<term>Score complaints</term>
<term>Score problems</term>
<term>Score satisfaction rate</term>
<term>Sensory changes</term>
<term>Standard treatment</term>
<term>Standardized procedure</term>
<term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term>
<term>Surveys and Questionnaires</term>
<term>Tough food</term>
<term>Treatment Outcome</term>
<term>Treatment modalities</term>
<term>Treatment options</term>
<term>University hospital groningen</term>
<term>Upper denture</term>
<term>Vestibuloplasty</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Analyse de variance</term>
<term>Enquêtes et questionnaires</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Mastication</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Overdenture</term>
<term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term>
<term>Prothèse dentaire complète inférieure</term>
<term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term>
<term>Résultat thérapeutique</term>
<term>Satisfaction du patient</term>
<term>Statistique non paramétrique</term>
<term>Vestibuloplastie</term>
<term>Études prospectives</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Currently, 3 treatment options are available for patients with denture complaints and an edentulous mandible with a height of at least 15 mm: meticulous construction of a new set of dentures (CD), construction of a new set of dentures following preprosthetic surgery to enlarge the denture‐bearing area (PPS), and construction of an implant‐retained mandibular overdenture (IRO). The aim of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction and subjective chewing ability of edentulous patients treated with one of these treatment modalities. Ninety edentulous patients (Cawood class IV and V, mean mandibular height 20.7 mm) were randomly assigned to receive 1 of these 3 groups. Denture satisfaction and chewing ability were assessed using questionnaires focusing on denture‐related complaints and problems chewing different types of food were assessed before treatment, and 1‐ and 5‐years after treatment. At the 1‐year evaluation, significantly better scores were observed in the 2 surgical groups (IRO, PPS) than in the CD group. At 5‐year evaluation the “complaints of the lower denture” showed a significantly better score in the IRO group when compared to the PPS and CD groups. No significant differences were observed between the PPS and CD group. From this study it is concluded that both in the short and long term denture satisfaction appears most favourable in the IRO group when compared to the PPS and CD groups. Implant‐retained overdentures are therefore a satisfactory treatment modality for edentulous patients with problems with their lower denture, even in cases of not severely resorbed mandibles.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<double idat="0905-7161:2000:Raghoebar G:effectiveness:of:three"><ISTEX><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Effectiveness of three treatment modalities for the edentulous mandible</title>
<author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, Gerry M" sort="Raghoebar, Gerry M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="Gerry M." last="Raghoebar">Gerry M. Raghoebar</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Meijer, Henny J A" sort="Meijer, Henny J A" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="Henny J. A." last="Meijer">Henny J. A. Meijer</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Stegenga, Boudewijn" sort="Stegenga, Boudewijn" uniqKey="Stegenga B" first="Boudewijn" last="Stegenga">Boudewijn Stegenga</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van T Hof, Martin A" sort="Van T Hof, Martin A" uniqKey="Van T Hof M" first="Martin A." last="Van'T Hof">Martin A. Van'T Hof</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van Oort, Rob P" sort="Van Oort, Rob P" uniqKey="Van Oort R" first="Rob P." last="Van Oort">Rob P. Van Oort</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Vissink, Arjan" sort="Vissink, Arjan" uniqKey="Vissink A" first="Arjan" last="Vissink">Arjan Vissink</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:5AEC8879D94564E2C7FE12BCACF1F5F0BA477778</idno>
<date when="2000" year="2000">2000</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011003195.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/5AEC8879D94564E2C7FE12BCACF1F5F0BA477778/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002C81</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002C81</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">002C81</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">003F90</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">003F90</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0905-7161:2000:Raghoebar G:effectiveness:of:three</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">009331</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Effectiveness of three treatment modalities for the edentulous mandible</title>
<author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, Gerry M" sort="Raghoebar, Gerry M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="Gerry M." last="Raghoebar">Gerry M. Raghoebar</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>University Hospital Groningen</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Meijer, Henny J A" sort="Meijer, Henny J A" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="Henny J. A." last="Meijer">Henny J. A. Meijer</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>University Hospital Groningen</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Stegenga, Boudewijn" sort="Stegenga, Boudewijn" uniqKey="Stegenga B" first="Boudewijn" last="Stegenga">Boudewijn Stegenga</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>University Hospital Groningen</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van T Hof, Martin A" sort="Van T Hof, Martin A" uniqKey="Van T Hof M" first="Martin A." last="Van'T Hof">Martin A. Van'T Hof</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Medical Statistics, University of Nijmegen</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>University of Nijmegen</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van Oort, Rob P" sort="Van Oort, Rob P" uniqKey="Van Oort R" first="Rob P." last="Van Oort">Rob P. Van Oort</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>University Hospital Groningen</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Vissink, Arjan" sort="Vissink, Arjan" uniqKey="Vissink A" first="Arjan" last="Vissink">Arjan Vissink</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>University Hospital Groningen</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">11</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="195">195</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="201">201</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope>
<publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher>
<pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2000-06">2000-06</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Ability questionnaire</term>
<term>Avec ancrage</term>
<term>Better scores</term>
<term>Clinical trials</term>
<term>Complete denture</term>
<term>Complete denture wearers</term>
<term>Complete dentures</term>
<term>Control group</term>
<term>Dental implants</term>
<term>Dental research</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Denture complaints</term>
<term>Denture complaints questionnaire</term>
<term>Denture satisfaction</term>
<term>Edentulous</term>
<term>Edentulous mandible</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Edentulous period</term>
<term>Endosseous</term>
<term>Endosseous implants</term>
<term>Este estudio</term>
<term>General anaesthesia</term>
<term>Hard food</term>
<term>Healing period</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implants research</term>
<term>International journal</term>
<term>Longitudinal study</term>
<term>Lower denture</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Mandibular height</term>
<term>Mandibular overdenture</term>
<term>Mandibular overdentures</term>
<term>Masticatory performance</term>
<term>Maxillofacial</term>
<term>Maxillofacial implants</term>
<term>Maxillofacial prosthodontics</term>
<term>Maxillofacial surgery</term>
<term>Meticulous construction</term>
<term>Modality</term>
<term>Nach</term>
<term>Nuevo juego</term>
<term>Oral implantology</term>
<term>Osseointegrated implants</term>
<term>Other items</term>
<term>Overall denture satisfaction</term>
<term>Overall denture satisfaction rating</term>
<term>Overdenture</term>
<term>Overdentures</term>
<term>Patient satisfaction</term>
<term>Preprosthetic</term>
<term>Preprosthetic surgery</term>
<term>Prosthetic dentistry</term>
<term>Prothese</term>
<term>Prothese amovible</term>
<term>Protheses amovibles</term>
<term>Protocol analysis</term>
<term>Raghoebar</term>
<term>Randomized</term>
<term>Rating scale</term>
<term>Satisfaction rate</term>
<term>Satisfaction rates</term>
<term>Satisfaction scores</term>
<term>Score complaints</term>
<term>Score problems</term>
<term>Score satisfaction rate</term>
<term>Sensory changes</term>
<term>Standard treatment</term>
<term>Standardized procedure</term>
<term>Tough food</term>
<term>Treatment modalities</term>
<term>Treatment options</term>
<term>University hospital groningen</term>
<term>Upper denture</term>
<term>Vestibuloplasty</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Ability questionnaire</term>
<term>Avec ancrage</term>
<term>Better scores</term>
<term>Clinical trials</term>
<term>Complete denture</term>
<term>Complete denture wearers</term>
<term>Complete dentures</term>
<term>Control group</term>
<term>Dental implants</term>
<term>Dental research</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Denture complaints</term>
<term>Denture complaints questionnaire</term>
<term>Denture satisfaction</term>
<term>Edentulous</term>
<term>Edentulous mandible</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Edentulous period</term>
<term>Endosseous</term>
<term>Endosseous implants</term>
<term>Este estudio</term>
<term>General anaesthesia</term>
<term>Hard food</term>
<term>Healing period</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implants research</term>
<term>International journal</term>
<term>Longitudinal study</term>
<term>Lower denture</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Mandibular height</term>
<term>Mandibular overdenture</term>
<term>Mandibular overdentures</term>
<term>Masticatory performance</term>
<term>Maxillofacial</term>
<term>Maxillofacial implants</term>
<term>Maxillofacial prosthodontics</term>
<term>Maxillofacial surgery</term>
<term>Meticulous construction</term>
<term>Modality</term>
<term>Nach</term>
<term>Nuevo juego</term>
<term>Oral implantology</term>
<term>Osseointegrated implants</term>
<term>Other items</term>
<term>Overall denture satisfaction</term>
<term>Overall denture satisfaction rating</term>
<term>Overdenture</term>
<term>Overdentures</term>
<term>Patient satisfaction</term>
<term>Preprosthetic</term>
<term>Preprosthetic surgery</term>
<term>Prosthetic dentistry</term>
<term>Prothese</term>
<term>Prothese amovible</term>
<term>Protheses amovibles</term>
<term>Protocol analysis</term>
<term>Raghoebar</term>
<term>Randomized</term>
<term>Rating scale</term>
<term>Satisfaction rate</term>
<term>Satisfaction rates</term>
<term>Satisfaction scores</term>
<term>Score complaints</term>
<term>Score problems</term>
<term>Score satisfaction rate</term>
<term>Sensory changes</term>
<term>Standard treatment</term>
<term>Standardized procedure</term>
<term>Tough food</term>
<term>Treatment modalities</term>
<term>Treatment options</term>
<term>University hospital groningen</term>
<term>Upper denture</term>
<term>Vestibuloplasty</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Currently, 3 treatment options are available for patients with denture complaints and an edentulous mandible with a height of at least 15 mm: meticulous construction of a new set of dentures (CD), construction of a new set of dentures following preprosthetic surgery to enlarge the denture‐bearing area (PPS), and construction of an implant‐retained mandibular overdenture (IRO). The aim of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction and subjective chewing ability of edentulous patients treated with one of these treatment modalities. Ninety edentulous patients (Cawood class IV and V, mean mandibular height 20.7 mm) were randomly assigned to receive 1 of these 3 groups. Denture satisfaction and chewing ability were assessed using questionnaires focusing on denture‐related complaints and problems chewing different types of food were assessed before treatment, and 1‐ and 5‐years after treatment. At the 1‐year evaluation, significantly better scores were observed in the 2 surgical groups (IRO, PPS) than in the CD group. At 5‐year evaluation the “complaints of the lower denture” showed a significantly better score in the IRO group when compared to the PPS and CD groups. No significant differences were observed between the PPS and CD group. From this study it is concluded that both in the short and long term denture satisfaction appears most favourable in the IRO group when compared to the PPS and CD groups. Implant‐retained overdentures are therefore a satisfactory treatment modality for edentulous patients with problems with their lower denture, even in cases of not severely resorbed mandibles.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</ISTEX>
<PubMed><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Effectiveness of three treatment modalities for the edentulous mandible. A five-year randomized clinical trial.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, G M" sort="Raghoebar, G M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="G M" last="Raghoebar">G M Raghoebar</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands. g.m.raghoebar@kchir.azg.nl</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>9700 RB Groningen</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Meijer, H J" sort="Meijer, H J" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="H J" last="Meijer">H J Meijer</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Stegenga, B" sort="Stegenga, B" uniqKey="Stegenga B" first="B" last="Stegenga">B. Stegenga</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van T Hof, M A" sort="Van T Hof, M A" uniqKey="Van T Hof M" first="M A" last="Van'T Hof">M A Van'T Hof</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van Oort, R P" sort="Van Oort, R P" uniqKey="Van Oort R" first="R P" last="Van Oort">R P Van Oort</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Vissink, A" sort="Vissink, A" uniqKey="Vissink A" first="A" last="Vissink">A. Vissink</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2000">2000</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:11168210</idno>
<idno type="pmid">11168210</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">003693</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003693</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">003693</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">003693</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">003693</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">003693</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">000471</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">000471</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">000471</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0905-7161:2000:Raghoebar G:effectiveness:of:three</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">009023</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Effectiveness of three treatment modalities for the edentulous mandible. A five-year randomized clinical trial.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, G M" sort="Raghoebar, G M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="G M" last="Raghoebar">G M Raghoebar</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands. g.m.raghoebar@kchir.azg.nl</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>9700 RB Groningen</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Meijer, H J" sort="Meijer, H J" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="H J" last="Meijer">H J Meijer</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Stegenga, B" sort="Stegenga, B" uniqKey="Stegenga B" first="B" last="Stegenga">B. Stegenga</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van T Hof, M A" sort="Van T Hof, M A" uniqKey="Van T Hof M" first="M A" last="Van'T Hof">M A Van'T Hof</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van Oort, R P" sort="Van Oort, R P" uniqKey="Van Oort R" first="R P" last="Van Oort">R P Van Oort</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Vissink, A" sort="Vissink, A" uniqKey="Vissink A" first="A" last="Vissink">A. Vissink</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Clinical oral implants research</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno>
<imprint><date when="2000" type="published">2000</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Analysis of Variance</term>
<term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term>
<term>Denture, Complete, Lower</term>
<term>Denture, Overlay</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Mastication</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Patient Satisfaction</term>
<term>Prospective Studies</term>
<term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term>
<term>Surveys and Questionnaires</term>
<term>Treatment Outcome</term>
<term>Vestibuloplasty</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Analyse de variance</term>
<term>Enquêtes et questionnaires</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Mastication</term>
<term>Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Overdenture</term>
<term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term>
<term>Prothèse dentaire complète inférieure</term>
<term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term>
<term>Résultat thérapeutique</term>
<term>Satisfaction du patient</term>
<term>Statistique non paramétrique</term>
<term>Vestibuloplastie</term>
<term>Études prospectives</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire édentée</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Analysis of Variance</term>
<term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term>
<term>Denture, Complete, Lower</term>
<term>Denture, Overlay</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Mastication</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Patient Satisfaction</term>
<term>Prospective Studies</term>
<term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term>
<term>Surveys and Questionnaires</term>
<term>Treatment Outcome</term>
<term>Vestibuloplasty</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Analyse de variance</term>
<term>Enquêtes et questionnaires</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Mastication</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Overdenture</term>
<term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term>
<term>Prothèse dentaire complète inférieure</term>
<term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term>
<term>Résultat thérapeutique</term>
<term>Satisfaction du patient</term>
<term>Statistique non paramétrique</term>
<term>Vestibuloplastie</term>
<term>Études prospectives</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Currently, 3 treatment options are available for patients with denture complaints and an edentulous mandible with a height of at least 15 mm: meticulous construction of a new set of dentures (CD), construction of a new set of dentures following preprosthetic surgery to enlarge the denture-bearing area (PPS), and construction of an implant-retained mandibular overdenture (IRO). The aim of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction and subjective chewing ability of edentulous patients treated with one of these treatment modalities. Ninety edentulous patients (Cawood class IV and V, mean mandibular height 20.7 mm) were randomly assigned to receive 1 of these 3 groups. Denture satisfaction and chewing ability were assessed using questionnaires focusing on denture-related complaints and problems chewing different types of food were assessed before treatment, and 1- and 5-years after treatment. At the 1-year evaluation, significantly better scores were observed in the 2 surgical groups (IRO, PPS) than in the CD group. At 5-year evaluation the "complaints of the lower denture" showed a significantly better score in the IRO group when compared to the PPS and CD groups. No significant differences were observed between the PPS and CD group. From this study it is concluded that both in the short and long term denture satisfaction appears most favourable in the IRO group when compared to the PPS and CD groups. Implant-retained overdentures are therefore a satisfactory treatment modality for edentulous patients with problems with their lower denture, even in cases of not severely resorbed mandibles.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</PubMed>
</double>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 008F46 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 008F46 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= Main |étape= Curation |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:5AEC8879D94564E2C7FE12BCACF1F5F0BA477778 |texte= Effectiveness of three treatment modalities for the edentulous mandible }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. | ![]() |