Effectiveness of three treatment modalities for the edentulous mandible. A five-year randomized clinical trial.
Identifieur interne : 003693 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 003692; suivant : 003694Effectiveness of three treatment modalities for the edentulous mandible. A five-year randomized clinical trial.
Auteurs : G M Raghoebar ; H J Meijer ; B. Stegenga ; M A Van'T Hof ; R P Van Oort ; A. VissinkSource :
- Clinical oral implants research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2000.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Analysis of Variance, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Denture, Complete, Lower, Denture, Overlay, Female, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Male, Mastication, Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction, Prospective Studies, Statistics, Nonparametric, Surveys and Questionnaires, Treatment Outcome, Vestibuloplasty.
- MESH :
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous.
- Analysis of Variance, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Denture, Complete, Lower, Denture, Overlay, Female, Humans, Male, Mastication, Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction, Prospective Studies, Statistics, Nonparametric, Surveys and Questionnaires, Treatment Outcome, Vestibuloplasty.
Abstract
Currently, 3 treatment options are available for patients with denture complaints and an edentulous mandible with a height of at least 15 mm: meticulous construction of a new set of dentures (CD), construction of a new set of dentures following preprosthetic surgery to enlarge the denture-bearing area (PPS), and construction of an implant-retained mandibular overdenture (IRO). The aim of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction and subjective chewing ability of edentulous patients treated with one of these treatment modalities. Ninety edentulous patients (Cawood class IV and V, mean mandibular height 20.7 mm) were randomly assigned to receive 1 of these 3 groups. Denture satisfaction and chewing ability were assessed using questionnaires focusing on denture-related complaints and problems chewing different types of food were assessed before treatment, and 1- and 5-years after treatment. At the 1-year evaluation, significantly better scores were observed in the 2 surgical groups (IRO, PPS) than in the CD group. At 5-year evaluation the "complaints of the lower denture" showed a significantly better score in the IRO group when compared to the PPS and CD groups. No significant differences were observed between the PPS and CD group. From this study it is concluded that both in the short and long term denture satisfaction appears most favourable in the IRO group when compared to the PPS and CD groups. Implant-retained overdentures are therefore a satisfactory treatment modality for edentulous patients with problems with their lower denture, even in cases of not severely resorbed mandibles.
PubMed: 11168210
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:11168210Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Effectiveness of three treatment modalities for the edentulous mandible. A five-year randomized clinical trial.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, G M" sort="Raghoebar, G M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="G M" last="Raghoebar">G M Raghoebar</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands. g.m.raghoebar@kchir.azg.nl</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Meijer, H J" sort="Meijer, H J" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="H J" last="Meijer">H J Meijer</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Stegenga, B" sort="Stegenga, B" uniqKey="Stegenga B" first="B" last="Stegenga">B. Stegenga</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van T Hof, M A" sort="Van T Hof, M A" uniqKey="Van T Hof M" first="M A" last="Van'T Hof">M A Van'T Hof</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van Oort, R P" sort="Van Oort, R P" uniqKey="Van Oort R" first="R P" last="Van Oort">R P Van Oort</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Vissink, A" sort="Vissink, A" uniqKey="Vissink A" first="A" last="Vissink">A. Vissink</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2000">2000</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:11168210</idno>
<idno type="pmid">11168210</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">003693</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003693</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Effectiveness of three treatment modalities for the edentulous mandible. A five-year randomized clinical trial.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, G M" sort="Raghoebar, G M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="G M" last="Raghoebar">G M Raghoebar</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands. g.m.raghoebar@kchir.azg.nl</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Meijer, H J" sort="Meijer, H J" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="H J" last="Meijer">H J Meijer</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Stegenga, B" sort="Stegenga, B" uniqKey="Stegenga B" first="B" last="Stegenga">B. Stegenga</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van T Hof, M A" sort="Van T Hof, M A" uniqKey="Van T Hof M" first="M A" last="Van'T Hof">M A Van'T Hof</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van Oort, R P" sort="Van Oort, R P" uniqKey="Van Oort R" first="R P" last="Van Oort">R P Van Oort</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Vissink, A" sort="Vissink, A" uniqKey="Vissink A" first="A" last="Vissink">A. Vissink</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Clinical oral implants research</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno>
<imprint><date when="2000" type="published">2000</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Analysis of Variance</term>
<term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term>
<term>Denture, Complete, Lower</term>
<term>Denture, Overlay</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Mastication</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Patient Satisfaction</term>
<term>Prospective Studies</term>
<term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term>
<term>Surveys and Questionnaires</term>
<term>Treatment Outcome</term>
<term>Vestibuloplasty</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Analysis of Variance</term>
<term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term>
<term>Denture, Complete, Lower</term>
<term>Denture, Overlay</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Mastication</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Patient Satisfaction</term>
<term>Prospective Studies</term>
<term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term>
<term>Surveys and Questionnaires</term>
<term>Treatment Outcome</term>
<term>Vestibuloplasty</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Currently, 3 treatment options are available for patients with denture complaints and an edentulous mandible with a height of at least 15 mm: meticulous construction of a new set of dentures (CD), construction of a new set of dentures following preprosthetic surgery to enlarge the denture-bearing area (PPS), and construction of an implant-retained mandibular overdenture (IRO). The aim of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction and subjective chewing ability of edentulous patients treated with one of these treatment modalities. Ninety edentulous patients (Cawood class IV and V, mean mandibular height 20.7 mm) were randomly assigned to receive 1 of these 3 groups. Denture satisfaction and chewing ability were assessed using questionnaires focusing on denture-related complaints and problems chewing different types of food were assessed before treatment, and 1- and 5-years after treatment. At the 1-year evaluation, significantly better scores were observed in the 2 surgical groups (IRO, PPS) than in the CD group. At 5-year evaluation the "complaints of the lower denture" showed a significantly better score in the IRO group when compared to the PPS and CD groups. No significant differences were observed between the PPS and CD group. From this study it is concluded that both in the short and long term denture satisfaction appears most favourable in the IRO group when compared to the PPS and CD groups. Implant-retained overdentures are therefore a satisfactory treatment modality for edentulous patients with problems with their lower denture, even in cases of not severely resorbed mandibles.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">11168210</PMID>
<DateCompleted><Year>2001</Year>
<Month>04</Month>
<Day>19</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2015</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>19</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0905-7161</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>11</Volume>
<Issue>3</Issue>
<PubDate><Year>2000</Year>
<Month>Jun</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Clinical oral implants research</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Clin Oral Implants Res</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Effectiveness of three treatment modalities for the edentulous mandible. A five-year randomized clinical trial.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>195-201</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<Abstract><AbstractText>Currently, 3 treatment options are available for patients with denture complaints and an edentulous mandible with a height of at least 15 mm: meticulous construction of a new set of dentures (CD), construction of a new set of dentures following preprosthetic surgery to enlarge the denture-bearing area (PPS), and construction of an implant-retained mandibular overdenture (IRO). The aim of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction and subjective chewing ability of edentulous patients treated with one of these treatment modalities. Ninety edentulous patients (Cawood class IV and V, mean mandibular height 20.7 mm) were randomly assigned to receive 1 of these 3 groups. Denture satisfaction and chewing ability were assessed using questionnaires focusing on denture-related complaints and problems chewing different types of food were assessed before treatment, and 1- and 5-years after treatment. At the 1-year evaluation, significantly better scores were observed in the 2 surgical groups (IRO, PPS) than in the CD group. At 5-year evaluation the "complaints of the lower denture" showed a significantly better score in the IRO group when compared to the PPS and CD groups. No significant differences were observed between the PPS and CD group. From this study it is concluded that both in the short and long term denture satisfaction appears most favourable in the IRO group when compared to the PPS and CD groups. Implant-retained overdentures are therefore a satisfactory treatment modality for edentulous patients with problems with their lower denture, even in cases of not severely resorbed mandibles.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Raghoebar</LastName>
<ForeName>G M</ForeName>
<Initials>GM</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands. g.m.raghoebar@kchir.azg.nl</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Meijer</LastName>
<ForeName>H J</ForeName>
<Initials>HJ</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Stegenga</LastName>
<ForeName>B</ForeName>
<Initials>B</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>van't Hof</LastName>
<ForeName>M A</ForeName>
<Initials>MA</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>van Oort</LastName>
<ForeName>R P</ForeName>
<Initials>RP</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Vissink</LastName>
<ForeName>A</ForeName>
<Initials>A</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016430">Clinical Trial</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D016449">Randomized Controlled Trial</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Denmark</Country>
<MedlineTA>Clin Oral Implants Res</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>9105713</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0905-7161</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000704" MajorTopicYN="N">Analysis of Variance</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003826" MajorTopicYN="Y">Denture, Complete, Lower</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003828" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture, Overlay</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="Y">rehabilitation</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008409" MajorTopicYN="N">Mastication</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017060" MajorTopicYN="N">Patient Satisfaction</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011446" MajorTopicYN="N">Prospective Studies</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018709" MajorTopicYN="N">Statistics, Nonparametric</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011795" MajorTopicYN="N">Surveys and Questionnaires</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016896" MajorTopicYN="N">Treatment Outcome</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014727" MajorTopicYN="Y">Vestibuloplasty</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2001</Year>
<Month>2</Month>
<Day>13</Day>
<Hour>11</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2001</Year>
<Month>4</Month>
<Day>21</Day>
<Hour>10</Hour>
<Minute>1</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2001</Year>
<Month>2</Month>
<Day>13</Day>
<Hour>11</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11168210</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pii">clr110302</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003693 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003693 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= PubMed |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= pubmed:11168210 |texte= Effectiveness of three treatment modalities for the edentulous mandible. A five-year randomized clinical trial. }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:11168210" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |