Mastication and jaw motion of partially edentulous patients are affected by different implant‐based prostheses
Identifieur interne : 007031 ( Istex/Curation ); précédent : 007030; suivant : 007032Mastication and jaw motion of partially edentulous patients are affected by different implant‐based prostheses
Auteurs : T. M. S. V. Gonçalves [Brésil] ; C. H. Campos [Brésil] ; R. C. M. Rodrigues Garcia [Brésil]Source :
- Journal of Oral Rehabilitation [ 0305-182X ] ; 2014-07.
Abstract
The main goal of prosthetic treatment is to restore masticatory function. However, insufficient evidence supports the recommendation of one specific prosthetic intervention for partially edentulous patients. Function after the use of three different prostheses by the same partially edentulous subject. Mastication was assessed in 12 subjects (mean age 62·6 ± 7·8 years) after they had used removable partial dentures (RPDs), implant‐supported partial dentures (IRPDs) and implant‐fixed partial dentures (IFPDs). Masticatory ability (MA) was estimated by visual analogue scale questionnaire, while the mandibular chewing motion was evaluated by kinesiographic device, representing an objective measurement of masticatory function. Data were analysed by repeated‐measures anova followed by Tukey–Kramer (P < 0·05). MA improved after IRPD and IFPD use (P < 0·05). Opening, closing and total cycle time duration were reduced after both IRPD and IFPD use (P < 0·05), irrespectively the implant prosthesis type. IFPDs and IRPDs restore the masticatory function of partially edentulous patients better than RPDs.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/joor.12176
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :007031
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:E1E8988D1A723F57CE55CB0FE506AC6C67E532E7Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Mastication and jaw motion of partially edentulous patients are affected by different implant‐based prostheses</title><author><name sortKey="Goncalves, T M S V" sort="Goncalves, T M S V" uniqKey="Goncalves T" first="T. M. S. V." last="Gonçalves">T. M. S. V. Gonçalves</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Brésil</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Campos, C H" sort="Campos, C H" uniqKey="Campos C" first="C. H." last="Campos">C. H. Campos</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Brésil</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Rodrigues Garcia, R C M" sort="Rodrigues Garcia, R C M" uniqKey="Rodrigues Garcia R" first="R. C. M." last="Rodrigues Garcia">R. C. M. Rodrigues Garcia</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Brésil</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba</wicri:regionArea></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence: Renata C. M. Rodrigues Garcia, Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Av. Limeira, no 901, Bairro Areião, Piracicaba, SP CEP: 13414‐903, Brazil.E‐mail:</mods:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">Brazil.E‐mail:</wicri:noCountry></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>E-mail: regarcia@fop.unicamp.br</mods:affiliation><country wicri:rule="url">Brésil</country></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:E1E8988D1A723F57CE55CB0FE506AC6C67E532E7</idno><date when="2014" year="2014">2014</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/joor.12176</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/E1E8988D1A723F57CE55CB0FE506AC6C67E532E7/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">007031</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">007031</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">007031</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Mastication and jaw motion of partially edentulous patients are affected by different implant‐based prostheses</title><author><name sortKey="Goncalves, T M S V" sort="Goncalves, T M S V" uniqKey="Goncalves T" first="T. M. S. V." last="Gonçalves">T. M. S. V. Gonçalves</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Brésil</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Campos, C H" sort="Campos, C H" uniqKey="Campos C" first="C. H." last="Campos">C. H. Campos</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Brésil</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Rodrigues Garcia, R C M" sort="Rodrigues Garcia, R C M" uniqKey="Rodrigues Garcia R" first="R. C. M." last="Rodrigues Garcia">R. C. M. Rodrigues Garcia</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Brésil</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba</wicri:regionArea></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence: Renata C. M. Rodrigues Garcia, Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Av. Limeira, no 901, Bairro Areião, Piracicaba, SP CEP: 13414‐903, Brazil.E‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>E-mail: regarcia@fop.unicamp.br</mods:affiliation><country wicri:rule="url">Brésil</country></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION</title><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">41</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">7</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="507">507</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="514">514</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><date type="published" when="2014-07">2014-07</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">The main goal of prosthetic treatment is to restore masticatory function. However, insufficient evidence supports the recommendation of one specific prosthetic intervention for partially edentulous patients. Function after the use of three different prostheses by the same partially edentulous subject. Mastication was assessed in 12 subjects (mean age 62·6 ± 7·8 years) after they had used removable partial dentures (RPDs), implant‐supported partial dentures (IRPDs) and implant‐fixed partial dentures (IFPDs). Masticatory ability (MA) was estimated by visual analogue scale questionnaire, while the mandibular chewing motion was evaluated by kinesiographic device, representing an objective measurement of masticatory function. Data were analysed by repeated‐measures anova followed by Tukey–Kramer (P < 0·05). MA improved after IRPD and IFPD use (P < 0·05). Opening, closing and total cycle time duration were reduced after both IRPD and IFPD use (P < 0·05), irrespectively the implant prosthesis type. IFPDs and IRPDs restore the masticatory function of partially edentulous patients better than RPDs.</div></front></TEI></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 007031 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 007031 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:E1E8988D1A723F57CE55CB0FE506AC6C67E532E7
|texte= Mastication and jaw motion of partially edentulous patients are affected by different implant‐based prostheses
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |