Mastication and jaw motion of partially edentulous patients are affected by different implant‐based prostheses
Identifieur interne : 007031 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 007030; suivant : 007032Mastication and jaw motion of partially edentulous patients are affected by different implant‐based prostheses
Auteurs : T. M. S. V. Gonçalves ; C. H. Campos ; R. C. M. Rodrigues GarciaSource :
- Journal of Oral Rehabilitation [ 0305-182X ] ; 2014-07.
Abstract
The main goal of prosthetic treatment is to restore masticatory function. However, insufficient evidence supports the recommendation of one specific prosthetic intervention for partially edentulous patients. Function after the use of three different prostheses by the same partially edentulous subject. Mastication was assessed in 12 subjects (mean age 62·6 ± 7·8 years) after they had used removable partial dentures (RPDs), implant‐supported partial dentures (IRPDs) and implant‐fixed partial dentures (IFPDs). Masticatory ability (MA) was estimated by visual analogue scale questionnaire, while the mandibular chewing motion was evaluated by kinesiographic device, representing an objective measurement of masticatory function. Data were analysed by repeated‐measures anova followed by Tukey–Kramer (P < 0·05). MA improved after IRPD and IFPD use (P < 0·05). Opening, closing and total cycle time duration were reduced after both IRPD and IFPD use (P < 0·05), irrespectively the implant prosthesis type. IFPDs and IRPDs restore the masticatory function of partially edentulous patients better than RPDs.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/joor.12176
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:E1E8988D1A723F57CE55CB0FE506AC6C67E532E7Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Mastication and jaw motion of partially edentulous patients are affected by different implant‐based prostheses</title><author><name sortKey="Goncalves, T M S V" sort="Goncalves, T M S V" uniqKey="Goncalves T" first="T. M. S. V." last="Gonçalves">T. M. S. V. Gonçalves</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Campos, C H" sort="Campos, C H" uniqKey="Campos C" first="C. H." last="Campos">C. H. Campos</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Rodrigues Garcia, R C M" sort="Rodrigues Garcia, R C M" uniqKey="Rodrigues Garcia R" first="R. C. M." last="Rodrigues Garcia">R. C. M. Rodrigues Garcia</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence: Renata C. M. Rodrigues Garcia, Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Av. Limeira, no 901, Bairro Areião, Piracicaba, SP CEP: 13414‐903, Brazil.E‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: regarcia@fop.unicamp.br</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:E1E8988D1A723F57CE55CB0FE506AC6C67E532E7</idno><date when="2014" year="2014">2014</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/joor.12176</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/E1E8988D1A723F57CE55CB0FE506AC6C67E532E7/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">007031</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">007031</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Mastication and jaw motion of partially edentulous patients are affected by different implant‐based prostheses</title><author><name sortKey="Goncalves, T M S V" sort="Goncalves, T M S V" uniqKey="Goncalves T" first="T. M. S. V." last="Gonçalves">T. M. S. V. Gonçalves</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Campos, C H" sort="Campos, C H" uniqKey="Campos C" first="C. H." last="Campos">C. H. Campos</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Rodrigues Garcia, R C M" sort="Rodrigues Garcia, R C M" uniqKey="Rodrigues Garcia R" first="R. C. M." last="Rodrigues Garcia">R. C. M. Rodrigues Garcia</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence: Renata C. M. Rodrigues Garcia, Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Av. Limeira, no 901, Bairro Areião, Piracicaba, SP CEP: 13414‐903, Brazil.E‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: regarcia@fop.unicamp.br</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION</title><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">41</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">7</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="507">507</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="514">514</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><date type="published" when="2014-07">2014-07</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">The main goal of prosthetic treatment is to restore masticatory function. However, insufficient evidence supports the recommendation of one specific prosthetic intervention for partially edentulous patients. Function after the use of three different prostheses by the same partially edentulous subject. Mastication was assessed in 12 subjects (mean age 62·6 ± 7·8 years) after they had used removable partial dentures (RPDs), implant‐supported partial dentures (IRPDs) and implant‐fixed partial dentures (IFPDs). Masticatory ability (MA) was estimated by visual analogue scale questionnaire, while the mandibular chewing motion was evaluated by kinesiographic device, representing an objective measurement of masticatory function. Data were analysed by repeated‐measures anova followed by Tukey–Kramer (P < 0·05). MA improved after IRPD and IFPD use (P < 0·05). Opening, closing and total cycle time duration were reduced after both IRPD and IFPD use (P < 0·05), irrespectively the implant prosthesis type. IFPDs and IRPDs restore the masticatory function of partially edentulous patients better than RPDs.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>T. M. S. V. Gonçalves</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>C. H. Campos</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>R. C. M. Rodrigues Garcia</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil</json:string><json:string>Correspondence: Renata C. M. Rodrigues Garcia, Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Av. Limeira, no 901, Bairro Areião, Piracicaba, SP CEP: 13414‐903, Brazil.E‐mail:</json:string><json:string>E-mail: regarcia@fop.unicamp.br</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>mastication</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>applied kinesiology</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>range of motion</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>removable partial denture</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>fixed partial denture</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant‐supported removable partial denture</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental implants</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>JOOR12176</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-V4SSQCQZ-6</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>The main goal of prosthetic treatment is to restore masticatory function. However, insufficient evidence supports the recommendation of one specific prosthetic intervention for partially edentulous patients. Function after the use of three different prostheses by the same partially edentulous subject. Mastication was assessed in 12 subjects (mean age 62·6 ± 7·8 years) after they had used removable partial dentures (RPDs), implant‐supported partial dentures (IRPDs) and implant‐fixed partial dentures (IFPDs). Masticatory ability (MA) was estimated by visual analogue scale questionnaire, while the mandibular chewing motion was evaluated by kinesiographic device, representing an objective measurement of masticatory function. Data were analysed by repeated‐measures anova followed by Tukey–Kramer (P > 0·05). MA improved after IRPD and IFPD use (P > 0·05). Opening, closing and total cycle time duration were reduced after both IRPD and IFPD use (P > 0·05), irrespectively the implant prosthesis type. IFPDs and IRPDs restore the masticatory function of partially edentulous patients better than RPDs.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.689</score><pdfWordCount>3937</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>26216</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>8</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>146</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1106</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>7</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Mastication and jaw motion of partially edentulous patients are affected by different implant‐based prostheses</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0305-182X</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1365-2842</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JOOR</json:string></publisherId><volume>41</volume><issue>7</issue><pages><first>507</first><last>514</last><total>8</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Original Article</value></json:item></subject></host><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-V4SSQCQZ-6</json:string></ark><publicationDate>2014</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2014</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/joor.12176</json:string></doi><id>E1E8988D1A723F57CE55CB0FE506AC6C67E532E7</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E1E8988D1A723F57CE55CB0FE506AC6C67E532E7/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E1E8988D1A723F57CE55CB0FE506AC6C67E532E7/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/E1E8988D1A723F57CE55CB0FE506AC6C67E532E7/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Mastication and jaw motion of partially edentulous patients are affected by different implant‐based prostheses</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Wiley Publishing Ltd</publisher><availability><licence>© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2014-07"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Mastication and jaw motion of partially edentulous patients are affected by different implant‐based prostheses</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">T. M. S. V.</forename><surname>Gonçalves</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology</orgName><orgName>Piracicaba Dental School</orgName><orgName>University of Campinas</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Piracicaba</settlement><country key="BR">Brazil</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">C. H.</forename><surname>Campos</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology</orgName><orgName>Piracicaba Dental School</orgName><orgName>University of Campinas</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Piracicaba</settlement><country key="BR">Brazil</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">R. C. M.</forename><surname>Rodrigues Garcia</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology</orgName><orgName>Piracicaba Dental School</orgName><orgName>University of Campinas</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Piracicaba</settlement><country key="BR">Brazil</country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Correspondence: Renata C. M. Rodrigues Garcia, Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Av. Limeira, no 901, Bairro Areião, Piracicaba, SP CEP: 13414‐903, Brazil. E‐mail: regarcia@fop.unicamp.br</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">E1E8988D1A723F57CE55CB0FE506AC6C67E532E7</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-V4SSQCQZ-6</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/joor.12176</idno><idno type="unit">JOOR12176</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JOOR.JOOR12176.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION</title><idno type="pISSN">0305-182X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/joor.2014.41.issue-7</idno><idno type="product">JOOR</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">41</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">7</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="507">507</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="514">514</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><date type="published" when="2014-07"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract style="main" xml:id="joor12176-abs-0001"><head>Summary</head><p>The main goal of prosthetic treatment is to restore masticatory function. However, insufficient evidence supports the recommendation of one specific prosthetic intervention for partially edentulous patients. Function after the use of three different prostheses by the same partially edentulous subject. Mastication was assessed in 12 subjects (mean age 62·6 ± 7·8 years) after they had used removable partial dentures (<hi rend="fc">RPD</hi>s), implant‐supported partial dentures (<hi rend="fc">IRPD</hi>s) and implant‐fixed partial dentures (<hi rend="fc">IFPD</hi>s). Masticatory ability (<hi rend="fc">MA</hi>) was estimated by visual analogue scale questionnaire, while the mandibular chewing motion was evaluated by kinesiographic device, representing an objective measurement of masticatory function. Data were analysed by repeated‐measures <hi rend="smallCaps">anova</hi> followed by <hi rend="fc">T</hi>ukey–<hi rend="fc">K</hi>ramer (<hi rend="italic">P </hi><<hi rend="italic"> </hi>0·05). <hi rend="fc">MA</hi> improved after <hi rend="fc">IRPD</hi> and <hi rend="fc">IFPD</hi> use (<hi rend="italic">P </hi><<hi rend="italic"> </hi>0·05). Opening, closing and total cycle time duration were reduced after both <hi rend="fc">IRPD</hi> and <hi rend="fc">IFPD</hi> use (<hi rend="italic">P </hi><<hi rend="italic"> </hi>0·05), irrespectively the implant prosthesis type. <hi rend="fc">IFPD</hi>s and <hi rend="fc">IRPD</hi>s restore the masticatory function of partially edentulous patients better than <hi rend="fc">RPD</hi>s.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords><term xml:id="joor12176-kwd-0001">mastication</term><term xml:id="joor12176-kwd-0002">applied kinesiology</term><term xml:id="joor12176-kwd-0003">range of motion</term><term xml:id="joor12176-kwd-0004">removable partial denture</term><term xml:id="joor12176-kwd-0005">fixed partial denture</term><term xml:id="joor12176-kwd-0006">implant‐supported removable partial denture</term><term xml:id="joor12176-kwd-0007">dental implants</term></keywords><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>Original Article</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component type="serialArticle" version="2.0" xml:id="joor12176" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</doi><issn type="print">0305-182X</issn><issn type="electronic">1365-2842</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JOOR"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title sort="JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title type="short">J Oral Rehabil</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="70"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/joor.2014.41.issue-7</doi><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="41">41</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">7</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2014-07">July 2014</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" position="40" status="forIssue" type="article"><doi>10.1111/joor.12176</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JOOR12176"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count number="8" type="pageTotal"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Original Article</title><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</copyright><eventGroup><event date="2014-03-23" type="manuscriptAccepted"></event><event agent="SPS" date="2014-03-31" type="xmlCreated"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2014-04-22"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2014-04-22"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2014-06-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.6.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-10-07"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">507</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">514</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><lineatedText><line>Correspondence: Renata C. M. Rodrigues Garcia, Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Av. Limeira, no 901, Bairro Areião, Piracicaba, SP CEP: 13414‐903, Brazil.</line><line>E‐mail: <email>regarcia@fop.unicamp.br</email></line></lineatedText></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JOOR.JOOR12176.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><titleGroup><title type="main">Mastication and jaw motion of partially edentulous patients are affected by different implant‐based prostheses</title><title type="shortAuthors">T. M. S. V. Gonçalves <i>et al</i>.</title></titleGroup><creators><creator affiliationRef="#joor12176-aff-0001" creatorRole="author" xml:id="joor12176-cr-0001"><personName><givenNames>T. M. S. V.</givenNames> <familyName>Gonçalves</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#joor12176-aff-0001" creatorRole="author" xml:id="joor12176-cr-0002"><personName><givenNames>C. H.</givenNames> <familyName>Campos</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#joor12176-aff-0001" corresponding="yes" creatorRole="author" xml:id="joor12176-cr-0003"><personName><givenNames>R. C. M.</givenNames> <familyName>Rodrigues Garcia</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation countryCode="BR" type="organization" xml:id="joor12176-aff-0001"><orgDiv>Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology</orgDiv> <orgName>Piracicaba Dental School</orgName> <orgName>University of Campinas</orgName> <address><city>Piracicaba</city> <country>Brazil</country></address></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup type="author"><keyword xml:id="joor12176-kwd-0001">mastication</keyword><keyword xml:id="joor12176-kwd-0002">applied kinesiology</keyword><keyword xml:id="joor12176-kwd-0003">range of motion</keyword><keyword xml:id="joor12176-kwd-0004">removable partial denture</keyword><keyword xml:id="joor12176-kwd-0005">fixed partial denture</keyword><keyword xml:id="joor12176-kwd-0006">implant‐supported removable partial denture</keyword><keyword xml:id="joor12176-kwd-0007">dental implants</keyword></keywordGroup><fundingInfo><fundingAgency>São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP)</fundingAgency><fundingNumber>2010/12251‐0</fundingNumber></fundingInfo><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:id="joor12176-abs-0001"><title type="main">Summary</title><p>The main goal of prosthetic treatment is to restore masticatory function. However, insufficient evidence supports the recommendation of one specific prosthetic intervention for partially edentulous patients. Function after the use of three different prostheses by the same partially edentulous subject. Mastication was assessed in 12 subjects (mean age 62·6 ± 7·8 years) after they had used removable partial dentures (<fc>RPD</fc>s), implant‐supported partial dentures (<fc>IRPD</fc>s) and implant‐fixed partial dentures (<fc>IFPD</fc>s). Masticatory ability (<fc>MA</fc>) was estimated by visual analogue scale questionnaire, while the mandibular chewing motion was evaluated by kinesiographic device, representing an objective measurement of masticatory function. Data were analysed by repeated‐measures <sc>anova</sc> followed by <fc>T</fc>ukey–<fc>K</fc>ramer (<i>P </i><<i> </i>0·05). <fc>MA</fc> improved after <fc>IRPD</fc> and <fc>IFPD</fc> use (<i>P </i><<i> </i>0·05). Opening, closing and total cycle time duration were reduced after both <fc>IRPD</fc> and <fc>IFPD</fc> use (<i>P </i><<i> </i>0·05), irrespectively the implant prosthesis type. <fc>IFPD</fc>s and <fc>IRPD</fc>s restore the masticatory function of partially edentulous patients better than <fc>RPD</fc>s.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Mastication and jaw motion of partially edentulous patients are affected by different implant‐based prostheses</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Mastication and jaw motion of partially edentulous patients are affected by different implant‐based prostheses</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">T. M. S. V.</namePart><namePart type="family">Gonçalves</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">C. H.</namePart><namePart type="family">Campos</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">R. C. M.</namePart><namePart type="family">Rodrigues Garcia</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil</affiliation><affiliation>Correspondence: Renata C. M. Rodrigues Garcia, Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Av. Limeira, no 901, Bairro Areião, Piracicaba, SP CEP: 13414‐903, Brazil.E‐mail:</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: regarcia@fop.unicamp.br</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2014-07</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2014-03-31</dateCreated><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2014-03-23</dateValid><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2014</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><abstract>The main goal of prosthetic treatment is to restore masticatory function. However, insufficient evidence supports the recommendation of one specific prosthetic intervention for partially edentulous patients. Function after the use of three different prostheses by the same partially edentulous subject. Mastication was assessed in 12 subjects (mean age 62·6 ± 7·8 years) after they had used removable partial dentures (RPDs), implant‐supported partial dentures (IRPDs) and implant‐fixed partial dentures (IFPDs). Masticatory ability (MA) was estimated by visual analogue scale questionnaire, while the mandibular chewing motion was evaluated by kinesiographic device, representing an objective measurement of masticatory function. Data were analysed by repeated‐measures anova followed by Tukey–Kramer (P < 0·05). MA improved after IRPD and IFPD use (P < 0·05). Opening, closing and total cycle time duration were reduced after both IRPD and IFPD use (P < 0·05), irrespectively the implant prosthesis type. IFPDs and IRPDs restore the masticatory function of partially edentulous patients better than RPDs.</abstract><note type="funding">São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) - No. 2010/12251‐0; </note><subject><genre>keywords</genre><topic>mastication</topic><topic>applied kinesiology</topic><topic>range of motion</topic><topic>removable partial denture</topic><topic>fixed partial denture</topic><topic>implant‐supported removable partial denture</topic><topic>dental implants</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>J Oral Rehabil</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Original Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0305-182X</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1365-2842</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JOOR</identifier><part><date>2014</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>41</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>7</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>507</start><end>514</end><total>8</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">E1E8988D1A723F57CE55CB0FE506AC6C67E532E7</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-V4SSQCQZ-6</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/joor.12176</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JOOR12176</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E1E8988D1A723F57CE55CB0FE506AC6C67E532E7/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 007031 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 007031 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:E1E8988D1A723F57CE55CB0FE506AC6C67E532E7
|texte= Mastication and jaw motion of partially edentulous patients are affected by different implant‐based prostheses
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |