Clinical Experiences of Implant‐Supported Prostheses with Laser‐Welded Titanium Frameworks in the Partially Edentulous Jaw: A 5‐Year Follow‐up Study
Identifieur interne : 006881 ( Istex/Curation ); précédent : 006880; suivant : 006882Clinical Experiences of Implant‐Supported Prostheses with Laser‐Welded Titanium Frameworks in the Partially Edentulous Jaw: A 5‐Year Follow‐up Study
Auteurs : Anders Örtorp [Suède] ; Torsten Jemt [Suède]Source :
- Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 1999-10.
Descripteurs français
- Wicri :
- topic : Maladie cardio-vasculaire, Titane.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Abutment tooth, Acrylic resin teeth, Additional implant, Bone quality, Bone resorption, Branemark clinic, Brinemark implants, Brinemark zarb, Cardiovascular, Cardiovascular disease, Cardiovascular problems, Clinical appointments, Clinical dentistry, Clinical experiences, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical performance, Composite resin, Dentacolorm resin, Dentacolorm veneers, Dentistry, Different veneering materials, Early stage, Edentulous, Edentulous jaws, Edentulous patient, Edentulous patients, First surgery, First year, Fracture, Implant, Implant components, Implant loss, Implant prosthesis, Implant survival, Implant treatment, Inclusion period, Jemt, Laser welding, Lekholm, Mandible, Marginal bone level, Marginal bone levels, Marginal bone loss, Maxilla, More implant failures, Nobel biocare, Oral maxillofac implants, Osseointegrated implants, Other studies, Partial edentulism, Partial prostheses, Periodontal disease, Porcelain, Porcelain fractures, Porcelain veneers, Present study, Prospective multicenter study, Prosthesis, Prosthesis stability, Prosthet dent, Resin teeth, Retrospective study, Routine basis, Second year, Severe fractures, Smoking habits, Study period, Titanium, Titanium framework, Titanium frameworks, Torsten jemt, Veneer, Veneer fractures, Veneering, Veneering material.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Abutment tooth, Acrylic resin teeth, Additional implant, Bone quality, Bone resorption, Branemark clinic, Brinemark implants, Brinemark zarb, Cardiovascular, Cardiovascular disease, Cardiovascular problems, Clinical appointments, Clinical dentistry, Clinical experiences, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical performance, Composite resin, Dentacolorm resin, Dentacolorm veneers, Dentistry, Different veneering materials, Early stage, Edentulous, Edentulous jaws, Edentulous patient, Edentulous patients, First surgery, First year, Fracture, Implant, Implant components, Implant loss, Implant prosthesis, Implant survival, Implant treatment, Inclusion period, Jemt, Laser welding, Lekholm, Mandible, Marginal bone level, Marginal bone levels, Marginal bone loss, Maxilla, More implant failures, Nobel biocare, Oral maxillofac implants, Osseointegrated implants, Other studies, Partial edentulism, Partial prostheses, Periodontal disease, Porcelain, Porcelain fractures, Porcelain veneers, Present study, Prospective multicenter study, Prosthesis, Prosthesis stability, Prosthet dent, Resin teeth, Retrospective study, Routine basis, Second year, Severe fractures, Smoking habits, Study period, Titanium, Titanium framework, Titanium frameworks, Torsten jemt, Veneer, Veneer fractures, Veneering, Veneering material.
Abstract
Background: Titanium frameworks have been used in the endentulous implant patient for the last 10 years. However, knowledge of titanium frameworks for the partially dentate patient is limited. Purpose: To report the 5‐year clinical performance of implant‐supported prostheses with laser‐welded titanium frameworks in the partially edentulous jaw. Materials and Methods: A consecutive group of 383 partially edentulous patients were, on a routine basis, provided with fixed partial prostheses supported by Brånemark implants in the mandible or maxilla. Besides conventional frameworks in cast gold alloy, 58 patients were provided with titanium frameworks with three different veneering techniques, and clinical and radiographic 5‐year data were collected for this group. Results: The overall cumulative survival rate was 95.6% for titanium‐framework prostheses and 93.6% for implants. Average bone loss during the follow‐up period was 0.4 mm. The most common complications were minor veneering fractures. Loose and fractured implant screw components were fewer than 2%. An observation was that patients on medications for cardiovascular problems may lose more implants than others (p <.05). Conclusions: The clinical performance of prostheses with implant‐supported laser‐welded titanium frameworks was similar to that reported for conventional cast frames in partially edentulous jaws. Low‐fusing porcelain veneers also showed clinical performance comparable to that reported for conventional porcelain‐fused‐to‐metal techniques.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.1999.tb00096.x
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :006881
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:D3152C75314A984B3D100045DE4923BAB1E441C8Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Clinical Experiences of Implant‐Supported Prostheses with Laser‐Welded Titanium Frameworks in the Partially Edentulous Jaw: A 5‐Year Follow‐up Study</title><author><name sortKey="Ortorp, Anders" sort="Ortorp, Anders" uniqKey="Ortorp A" first="Anders" last="Örtorp">Anders Örtorp</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Assistant Professor, Head of Prosthetic Division, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Suède</country><wicri:regionArea>Assistant Professor, Head of Prosthetic Division, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Gothenburg</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Jemt, Torsten" sort="Jemt, Torsten" uniqKey="Jemt T" first="Torsten" last="Jemt">Torsten Jemt</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Associate Professor, Head of Prosthetic Division, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Suède</country><wicri:regionArea>Associate Professor, Head of Prosthetic Division, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Gothenburg</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:D3152C75314A984B3D100045DE4923BAB1E441C8</idno><date when="1999" year="1999">1999</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.1999.tb00096.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/D3152C75314A984B3D100045DE4923BAB1E441C8/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">006881</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">006881</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">006881</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Clinical Experiences of Implant‐Supported Prostheses with Laser‐Welded Titanium Frameworks in the Partially Edentulous Jaw: A 5‐Year Follow‐up Study</title><author><name sortKey="Ortorp, Anders" sort="Ortorp, Anders" uniqKey="Ortorp A" first="Anders" last="Örtorp">Anders Örtorp</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Assistant Professor, Head of Prosthetic Division, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Suède</country><wicri:regionArea>Assistant Professor, Head of Prosthetic Division, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Gothenburg</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Jemt, Torsten" sort="Jemt, Torsten" uniqKey="Jemt T" first="Torsten" last="Jemt">Torsten Jemt</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Associate Professor, Head of Prosthetic Division, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Suède</country><wicri:regionArea>Associate Professor, Head of Prosthetic Division, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Gothenburg</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="84">84</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="91">91</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1999-10">1999-10</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment tooth</term><term>Acrylic resin teeth</term><term>Additional implant</term><term>Bone quality</term><term>Bone resorption</term><term>Branemark clinic</term><term>Brinemark implants</term><term>Brinemark zarb</term><term>Cardiovascular</term><term>Cardiovascular disease</term><term>Cardiovascular problems</term><term>Clinical appointments</term><term>Clinical dentistry</term><term>Clinical experiences</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical performance</term><term>Composite resin</term><term>Dentacolorm resin</term><term>Dentacolorm veneers</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Different veneering materials</term><term>Early stage</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous jaws</term><term>Edentulous patient</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>First surgery</term><term>First year</term><term>Fracture</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant components</term><term>Implant loss</term><term>Implant prosthesis</term><term>Implant survival</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Inclusion period</term><term>Jemt</term><term>Laser welding</term><term>Lekholm</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Marginal bone level</term><term>Marginal bone levels</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>More implant failures</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Other studies</term><term>Partial edentulism</term><term>Partial prostheses</term><term>Periodontal disease</term><term>Porcelain</term><term>Porcelain fractures</term><term>Porcelain veneers</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prospective multicenter study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthesis stability</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Resin teeth</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Routine basis</term><term>Second year</term><term>Severe fractures</term><term>Smoking habits</term><term>Study period</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium framework</term><term>Titanium frameworks</term><term>Torsten jemt</term><term>Veneer</term><term>Veneer fractures</term><term>Veneering</term><term>Veneering material</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment tooth</term><term>Acrylic resin teeth</term><term>Additional implant</term><term>Bone quality</term><term>Bone resorption</term><term>Branemark clinic</term><term>Brinemark implants</term><term>Brinemark zarb</term><term>Cardiovascular</term><term>Cardiovascular disease</term><term>Cardiovascular problems</term><term>Clinical appointments</term><term>Clinical dentistry</term><term>Clinical experiences</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical performance</term><term>Composite resin</term><term>Dentacolorm resin</term><term>Dentacolorm veneers</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Different veneering materials</term><term>Early stage</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous jaws</term><term>Edentulous patient</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>First surgery</term><term>First year</term><term>Fracture</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant components</term><term>Implant loss</term><term>Implant prosthesis</term><term>Implant survival</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Inclusion period</term><term>Jemt</term><term>Laser welding</term><term>Lekholm</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Marginal bone level</term><term>Marginal bone levels</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>More implant failures</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Other studies</term><term>Partial edentulism</term><term>Partial prostheses</term><term>Periodontal disease</term><term>Porcelain</term><term>Porcelain fractures</term><term>Porcelain veneers</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prospective multicenter study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthesis stability</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Resin teeth</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Routine basis</term><term>Second year</term><term>Severe fractures</term><term>Smoking habits</term><term>Study period</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium framework</term><term>Titanium frameworks</term><term>Torsten jemt</term><term>Veneer</term><term>Veneer fractures</term><term>Veneering</term><term>Veneering material</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Maladie cardio-vasculaire</term><term>Titane</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Background: Titanium frameworks have been used in the endentulous implant patient for the last 10 years. However, knowledge of titanium frameworks for the partially dentate patient is limited. Purpose: To report the 5‐year clinical performance of implant‐supported prostheses with laser‐welded titanium frameworks in the partially edentulous jaw. Materials and Methods: A consecutive group of 383 partially edentulous patients were, on a routine basis, provided with fixed partial prostheses supported by Brånemark implants in the mandible or maxilla. Besides conventional frameworks in cast gold alloy, 58 patients were provided with titanium frameworks with three different veneering techniques, and clinical and radiographic 5‐year data were collected for this group. Results: The overall cumulative survival rate was 95.6% for titanium‐framework prostheses and 93.6% for implants. Average bone loss during the follow‐up period was 0.4 mm. The most common complications were minor veneering fractures. Loose and fractured implant screw components were fewer than 2%. An observation was that patients on medications for cardiovascular problems may lose more implants than others (p <.05). Conclusions: The clinical performance of prostheses with implant‐supported laser‐welded titanium frameworks was similar to that reported for conventional cast frames in partially edentulous jaws. Low‐fusing porcelain veneers also showed clinical performance comparable to that reported for conventional porcelain‐fused‐to‐metal techniques.</div></front></TEI></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 006881 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 006881 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:D3152C75314A984B3D100045DE4923BAB1E441C8
|texte= Clinical Experiences of Implant‐Supported Prostheses with Laser‐Welded Titanium Frameworks in the Partially Edentulous Jaw: A 5‐Year Follow‐up Study
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |