Clinical Experiences of Implant‐Supported Prostheses with Laser‐Welded Titanium Frameworks in the Partially Edentulous Jaw: A 5‐Year Follow‐up Study
Identifieur interne : 006881 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 006880; suivant : 006882Clinical Experiences of Implant‐Supported Prostheses with Laser‐Welded Titanium Frameworks in the Partially Edentulous Jaw: A 5‐Year Follow‐up Study
Auteurs : Anders Örtorp ; Torsten JemtSource :
- Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 1999-10.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Abutment tooth, Acrylic resin teeth, Additional implant, Bone quality, Bone resorption, Branemark clinic, Brinemark implants, Brinemark zarb, Cardiovascular, Cardiovascular disease, Cardiovascular problems, Clinical appointments, Clinical dentistry, Clinical experiences, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical performance, Composite resin, Dentacolorm resin, Dentacolorm veneers, Dentistry, Different veneering materials, Early stage, Edentulous, Edentulous jaws, Edentulous patient, Edentulous patients, First surgery, First year, Fracture, Implant, Implant components, Implant loss, Implant prosthesis, Implant survival, Implant treatment, Inclusion period, Jemt, Laser welding, Lekholm, Mandible, Marginal bone level, Marginal bone levels, Marginal bone loss, Maxilla, More implant failures, Nobel biocare, Oral maxillofac implants, Osseointegrated implants, Other studies, Partial edentulism, Partial prostheses, Periodontal disease, Porcelain, Porcelain fractures, Porcelain veneers, Present study, Prospective multicenter study, Prosthesis, Prosthesis stability, Prosthet dent, Resin teeth, Retrospective study, Routine basis, Second year, Severe fractures, Smoking habits, Study period, Titanium, Titanium framework, Titanium frameworks, Torsten jemt, Veneer, Veneer fractures, Veneering, Veneering material.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Abutment tooth, Acrylic resin teeth, Additional implant, Bone quality, Bone resorption, Branemark clinic, Brinemark implants, Brinemark zarb, Cardiovascular, Cardiovascular disease, Cardiovascular problems, Clinical appointments, Clinical dentistry, Clinical experiences, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical performance, Composite resin, Dentacolorm resin, Dentacolorm veneers, Dentistry, Different veneering materials, Early stage, Edentulous, Edentulous jaws, Edentulous patient, Edentulous patients, First surgery, First year, Fracture, Implant, Implant components, Implant loss, Implant prosthesis, Implant survival, Implant treatment, Inclusion period, Jemt, Laser welding, Lekholm, Mandible, Marginal bone level, Marginal bone levels, Marginal bone loss, Maxilla, More implant failures, Nobel biocare, Oral maxillofac implants, Osseointegrated implants, Other studies, Partial edentulism, Partial prostheses, Periodontal disease, Porcelain, Porcelain fractures, Porcelain veneers, Present study, Prospective multicenter study, Prosthesis, Prosthesis stability, Prosthet dent, Resin teeth, Retrospective study, Routine basis, Second year, Severe fractures, Smoking habits, Study period, Titanium, Titanium framework, Titanium frameworks, Torsten jemt, Veneer, Veneer fractures, Veneering, Veneering material.
Abstract
Background: Titanium frameworks have been used in the endentulous implant patient for the last 10 years. However, knowledge of titanium frameworks for the partially dentate patient is limited. Purpose: To report the 5‐year clinical performance of implant‐supported prostheses with laser‐welded titanium frameworks in the partially edentulous jaw. Materials and Methods: A consecutive group of 383 partially edentulous patients were, on a routine basis, provided with fixed partial prostheses supported by Brånemark implants in the mandible or maxilla. Besides conventional frameworks in cast gold alloy, 58 patients were provided with titanium frameworks with three different veneering techniques, and clinical and radiographic 5‐year data were collected for this group. Results: The overall cumulative survival rate was 95.6% for titanium‐framework prostheses and 93.6% for implants. Average bone loss during the follow‐up period was 0.4 mm. The most common complications were minor veneering fractures. Loose and fractured implant screw components were fewer than 2%. An observation was that patients on medications for cardiovascular problems may lose more implants than others (p <.05). Conclusions: The clinical performance of prostheses with implant‐supported laser‐welded titanium frameworks was similar to that reported for conventional cast frames in partially edentulous jaws. Low‐fusing porcelain veneers also showed clinical performance comparable to that reported for conventional porcelain‐fused‐to‐metal techniques.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.1999.tb00096.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:D3152C75314A984B3D100045DE4923BAB1E441C8Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Clinical Experiences of Implant‐Supported Prostheses with Laser‐Welded Titanium Frameworks in the Partially Edentulous Jaw: A 5‐Year Follow‐up Study</title><author><name sortKey="Ortorp, Anders" sort="Ortorp, Anders" uniqKey="Ortorp A" first="Anders" last="Örtorp">Anders Örtorp</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Assistant Professor, Head of Prosthetic Division, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Jemt, Torsten" sort="Jemt, Torsten" uniqKey="Jemt T" first="Torsten" last="Jemt">Torsten Jemt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Associate Professor, Head of Prosthetic Division, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:D3152C75314A984B3D100045DE4923BAB1E441C8</idno><date when="1999" year="1999">1999</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.1999.tb00096.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/D3152C75314A984B3D100045DE4923BAB1E441C8/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">006881</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">006881</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Clinical Experiences of Implant‐Supported Prostheses with Laser‐Welded Titanium Frameworks in the Partially Edentulous Jaw: A 5‐Year Follow‐up Study</title><author><name sortKey="Ortorp, Anders" sort="Ortorp, Anders" uniqKey="Ortorp A" first="Anders" last="Örtorp">Anders Örtorp</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Assistant Professor, Head of Prosthetic Division, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Jemt, Torsten" sort="Jemt, Torsten" uniqKey="Jemt T" first="Torsten" last="Jemt">Torsten Jemt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Associate Professor, Head of Prosthetic Division, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="84">84</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="91">91</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1999-10">1999-10</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment tooth</term><term>Acrylic resin teeth</term><term>Additional implant</term><term>Bone quality</term><term>Bone resorption</term><term>Branemark clinic</term><term>Brinemark implants</term><term>Brinemark zarb</term><term>Cardiovascular</term><term>Cardiovascular disease</term><term>Cardiovascular problems</term><term>Clinical appointments</term><term>Clinical dentistry</term><term>Clinical experiences</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical performance</term><term>Composite resin</term><term>Dentacolorm resin</term><term>Dentacolorm veneers</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Different veneering materials</term><term>Early stage</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous jaws</term><term>Edentulous patient</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>First surgery</term><term>First year</term><term>Fracture</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant components</term><term>Implant loss</term><term>Implant prosthesis</term><term>Implant survival</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Inclusion period</term><term>Jemt</term><term>Laser welding</term><term>Lekholm</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Marginal bone level</term><term>Marginal bone levels</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>More implant failures</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Other studies</term><term>Partial edentulism</term><term>Partial prostheses</term><term>Periodontal disease</term><term>Porcelain</term><term>Porcelain fractures</term><term>Porcelain veneers</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prospective multicenter study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthesis stability</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Resin teeth</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Routine basis</term><term>Second year</term><term>Severe fractures</term><term>Smoking habits</term><term>Study period</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium framework</term><term>Titanium frameworks</term><term>Torsten jemt</term><term>Veneer</term><term>Veneer fractures</term><term>Veneering</term><term>Veneering material</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment tooth</term><term>Acrylic resin teeth</term><term>Additional implant</term><term>Bone quality</term><term>Bone resorption</term><term>Branemark clinic</term><term>Brinemark implants</term><term>Brinemark zarb</term><term>Cardiovascular</term><term>Cardiovascular disease</term><term>Cardiovascular problems</term><term>Clinical appointments</term><term>Clinical dentistry</term><term>Clinical experiences</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical performance</term><term>Composite resin</term><term>Dentacolorm resin</term><term>Dentacolorm veneers</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Different veneering materials</term><term>Early stage</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous jaws</term><term>Edentulous patient</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>First surgery</term><term>First year</term><term>Fracture</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant components</term><term>Implant loss</term><term>Implant prosthesis</term><term>Implant survival</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Inclusion period</term><term>Jemt</term><term>Laser welding</term><term>Lekholm</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Marginal bone level</term><term>Marginal bone levels</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>More implant failures</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Other studies</term><term>Partial edentulism</term><term>Partial prostheses</term><term>Periodontal disease</term><term>Porcelain</term><term>Porcelain fractures</term><term>Porcelain veneers</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prospective multicenter study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthesis stability</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Resin teeth</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Routine basis</term><term>Second year</term><term>Severe fractures</term><term>Smoking habits</term><term>Study period</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium framework</term><term>Titanium frameworks</term><term>Torsten jemt</term><term>Veneer</term><term>Veneer fractures</term><term>Veneering</term><term>Veneering material</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Background: Titanium frameworks have been used in the endentulous implant patient for the last 10 years. However, knowledge of titanium frameworks for the partially dentate patient is limited. Purpose: To report the 5‐year clinical performance of implant‐supported prostheses with laser‐welded titanium frameworks in the partially edentulous jaw. Materials and Methods: A consecutive group of 383 partially edentulous patients were, on a routine basis, provided with fixed partial prostheses supported by Brånemark implants in the mandible or maxilla. Besides conventional frameworks in cast gold alloy, 58 patients were provided with titanium frameworks with three different veneering techniques, and clinical and radiographic 5‐year data were collected for this group. Results: The overall cumulative survival rate was 95.6% for titanium‐framework prostheses and 93.6% for implants. Average bone loss during the follow‐up period was 0.4 mm. The most common complications were minor veneering fractures. Loose and fractured implant screw components were fewer than 2%. An observation was that patients on medications for cardiovascular problems may lose more implants than others (p <.05). Conclusions: The clinical performance of prostheses with implant‐supported laser‐welded titanium frameworks was similar to that reported for conventional cast frames in partially edentulous jaws. Low‐fusing porcelain veneers also showed clinical performance comparable to that reported for conventional porcelain‐fused‐to‐metal techniques.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>titanium frameworks</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>veneering</json:string><json:string>jemt</json:string><json:string>titanium</json:string><json:string>veneer</json:string><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>fracture</json:string><json:string>porcelain veneers</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>maxilla</json:string><json:string>lekholm</json:string><json:string>porcelain</json:string><json:string>cardiovascular problems</json:string><json:string>inclusion period</json:string><json:string>marginal bone loss</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string><json:string>edentulous jaws</json:string><json:string>clinical performance</json:string><json:string>routine basis</json:string><json:string>implant loss</json:string><json:string>clinical dentistry</json:string><json:string>prosthet dent</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string><json:string>composite resin</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>cardiovascular</json:string><json:string>clinical appointments</json:string><json:string>study period</json:string><json:string>veneering material</json:string><json:string>titanium framework</json:string><json:string>other studies</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>nobel biocare</json:string><json:string>resin teeth</json:string><json:string>retrospective study</json:string><json:string>clinical experiences</json:string><json:string>different veneering materials</json:string><json:string>acrylic resin teeth</json:string><json:string>early stage</json:string><json:string>implant prosthesis</json:string><json:string>first surgery</json:string><json:string>laser welding</json:string><json:string>first year</json:string><json:string>prosthesis stability</json:string><json:string>veneer fractures</json:string><json:string>bone resorption</json:string><json:string>torsten jemt</json:string><json:string>brinemark implants</json:string><json:string>marginal bone level</json:string><json:string>more implant failures</json:string><json:string>dentacolorm resin</json:string><json:string>dentacolorm veneers</json:string><json:string>second year</json:string><json:string>edentulous patient</json:string><json:string>porcelain fractures</json:string><json:string>marginal bone levels</json:string><json:string>branemark clinic</json:string><json:string>implant survival</json:string><json:string>smoking habits</json:string><json:string>cardiovascular disease</json:string><json:string>additional implant</json:string><json:string>severe fractures</json:string><json:string>implant components</json:string><json:string>partial prostheses</json:string><json:string>implant treatment</json:string><json:string>prospective multicenter study</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>partial edentulism</json:string><json:string>abutment tooth</json:string><json:string>bone quality</json:string><json:string>brinemark zarb</json:string><json:string>periodontal disease</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Anders Örtorp LDS</name><affiliations><json:string>Assistant Professor, Head of Prosthetic Division, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Gothenburg, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Torsten Jemt LDS, Odont Dr</name><affiliations><json:string>Associate Professor, Head of Prosthetic Division, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Gothenburg, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant‐supported</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>laser‐welded titanium</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>partially edentulous</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>protheses</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CID84</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-F3SPBFWC-D</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Background: Titanium frameworks have been used in the endentulous implant patient for the last 10 years. However, knowledge of titanium frameworks for the partially dentate patient is limited. Purpose: To report the 5‐year clinical performance of implant‐supported prostheses with laser‐welded titanium frameworks in the partially edentulous jaw. Materials and Methods: A consecutive group of 383 partially edentulous patients were, on a routine basis, provided with fixed partial prostheses supported by Brånemark implants in the mandible or maxilla. Besides conventional frameworks in cast gold alloy, 58 patients were provided with titanium frameworks with three different veneering techniques, and clinical and radiographic 5‐year data were collected for this group. Results: The overall cumulative survival rate was 95.6% for titanium‐framework prostheses and 93.6% for implants. Average bone loss during the follow‐up period was 0.4 mm. The most common complications were minor veneering fractures. Loose and fractured implant screw components were fewer than 2%. An observation was that patients on medications for cardiovascular problems may lose more implants than others (p >.05). Conclusions: The clinical performance of prostheses with implant‐supported laser‐welded titanium frameworks was similar to that reported for conventional cast frames in partially edentulous jaws. Low‐fusing porcelain veneers also showed clinical performance comparable to that reported for conventional porcelain‐fused‐to‐metal techniques.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.454</score><pdfWordCount>3970</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>25508</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>8</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>576 x 791.759 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>207</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1530</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>4</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Clinical Experiences of Implant‐Supported Prostheses with Laser‐Welded Titanium Frameworks in the Partially Edentulous Jaw: A 5‐Year Follow‐up Study</title><pmid><json:string>11359302</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1523-0899</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1708-8208</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CID</json:string></publisherId><volume>1</volume><issue>2</issue><pages><first>84</first><last>91</last><total>8</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>4641</json:string><json:string>1999</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Related Research, Volume</json:string><json:string>Committee on Research, Science, and Therapy</json:string><json:string>American Academy of Periodotology</json:string><json:string>Committee on Research‐Science, and Therapy</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>P. Causes</json:string><json:string>Related</json:string><json:string>U. Failures</json:string><json:string>Lost</json:string><json:string>To</json:string><json:string>T. Failures</json:string><json:string>T. Association</json:string><json:string>K. Metameramischer</json:string><json:string>Mean</json:string><json:string>R. Aspects</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Gothenburg</json:string><json:string>Chicago</json:string><json:string>Ahlen</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>December 1990</json:string><json:string>September 1993</json:string><json:string>Naert et aL</json:string><json:string>Lindh et al.</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-F3SPBFWC-D</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>1999</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1999</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1708-8208.1999.tb00096.x</json:string></doi><id>D3152C75314A984B3D100045DE4923BAB1E441C8</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D3152C75314A984B3D100045DE4923BAB1E441C8/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D3152C75314A984B3D100045DE4923BAB1E441C8/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/D3152C75314A984B3D100045DE4923BAB1E441C8/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Clinical Experiences of Implant‐Supported Prostheses with Laser‐Welded Titanium Frameworks in the Partially Edentulous Jaw: A 5‐Year Follow‐up Study</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1999-10"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Clinical Experiences of Implant‐Supported Prostheses with Laser‐Welded Titanium Frameworks in the Partially Edentulous Jaw: A 5‐Year Follow‐up Study</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Anders</forename><surname>Örtorp</surname><roleName type="degree">LDS</roleName></persName><affiliation>Assistant Professor, Head of Prosthetic Division, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Gothenburg, Sweden<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Torsten</forename><surname>Jemt</surname><roleName type="degree">LDS, Odont Dr</roleName></persName><affiliation>Associate Professor, Head of Prosthetic Division, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Gothenburg, Sweden<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">D3152C75314A984B3D100045DE4923BAB1E441C8</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-F3SPBFWC-D</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.1999.tb00096.x</idno><idno type="unit">CID84</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CID.CID84.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cid.1999.1.issue-2</idno><idno type="product">CID</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="84">84</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="91">91</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1999-10"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>ABSTRACT</head><p>
<hi rend="italic">Background</hi>: Titanium frameworks have been used in the endentulous implant patient for the last 10 years. However, knowledge of titanium frameworks for the partially dentate patient is limited.</p><p>
<hi rend="italic">Purpose</hi>: To report the 5‐year clinical performance of implant‐supported prostheses with laser‐welded titanium frameworks in the partially edentulous jaw.</p><p>
<hi rend="italic">Materials and Methods</hi>: A consecutive group of 383 partially edentulous patients were, on a routine basis, provided with fixed partial prostheses supported by Brånemark implants in the mandible or maxilla. Besides conventional frameworks in cast gold alloy, 58 patients were provided with titanium frameworks with three different veneering techniques, and clinical and radiographic 5‐year data were collected for this group.</p><p>
<hi rend="italic">Results</hi>: The overall cumulative survival rate was 95.6% for titanium‐framework prostheses and 93.6% for implants. Average bone loss during the follow‐up period was 0.4 mm. The most common complications were minor veneering fractures. Loose and fractured implant screw components were fewer than 2%. An observation was that patients on medications for cardiovascular problems may lose more implants than others (p <.05).</p><p>
<hi rend="italic">Conclusions</hi>: The clinical performance of prostheses with implant‐supported laser‐welded titanium frameworks was similar to that reported for conventional cast frames in partially edentulous jaws. Low‐fusing porcelain veneers also showed clinical performance comparable to that reported for conventional porcelain‐fused‐to‐metal techniques.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">implant‐supported</term><term xml:id="k2">laser‐welded titanium</term><term xml:id="k3">partially edentulous</term><term xml:id="k4">protheses</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D3152C75314A984B3D100045DE4923BAB1E441C8/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</doi><issn type="print">1523-0899</issn><issn type="electronic">1708-8208</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CID"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="10002"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cid.1999.1.issue-2</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="1">1</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="2">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="1999-10">October 1999</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0008400" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1708-8208.1999.tb00096.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CID84"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="8"></count></countGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2007-04-10"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2007-04-10"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-03-13"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-17"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="84">84</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="91">91</numbering></numberingGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CID.CID84.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="referenceTotal" number="32"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="2"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Clinical Experiences of Implant‐Supported Prostheses with Laser‐Welded Titanium Frameworks in the Partially Edentulous Jaw: A 5‐Year Follow‐up Study</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Anders</givenNames><familyName>Örtorp</familyName><degrees>LDS</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Torsten</givenNames><familyName>Jemt</familyName><degrees>LDS, Odont Dr</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>Assistant Professor, Head of Prosthetic Division, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Gothenburg, Sweden</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>Associate Professor, Head of Prosthetic Division, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Gothenburg, Sweden</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">implant‐supported</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">laser‐welded titanium</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">partially edentulous</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">protheses</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p> <i>Background</i>: Titanium frameworks have been used in the endentulous implant patient for the last 10 years. However, knowledge of titanium frameworks for the partially dentate patient is limited.</p><p> <i>Purpose</i>: To report the 5‐year clinical performance of implant‐supported prostheses with laser‐welded titanium frameworks in the partially edentulous jaw.</p><p> <i>Materials and Methods</i>: A consecutive group of 383 partially edentulous patients were, on a routine basis, provided with fixed partial prostheses supported by Brånemark implants in the mandible or maxilla. Besides conventional frameworks in cast gold alloy, 58 patients were provided with titanium frameworks with three different veneering techniques, and clinical and radiographic 5‐year data were collected for this group.</p><p> <i>Results</i>: The overall cumulative survival rate was 95.6% for titanium‐framework prostheses and 93.6% for implants. Average bone loss during the follow‐up period was 0.4 mm. The most common complications were minor veneering fractures. Loose and fractured implant screw components were fewer than 2%. An observation was that patients on medications for cardiovascular problems may lose more implants than others (p <.05).</p><p> <i>Conclusions</i>: The clinical performance of prostheses with implant‐supported laser‐welded titanium frameworks was similar to that reported for conventional cast frames in partially edentulous jaws. Low‐fusing porcelain veneers also showed clinical performance comparable to that reported for conventional porcelain‐fused‐to‐metal techniques.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Clinical Experiences of Implant‐Supported Prostheses with Laser‐Welded Titanium Frameworks in the Partially Edentulous Jaw: A 5‐Year Follow‐up Study</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Clinical Experiences of Implant‐Supported Prostheses with Laser‐Welded Titanium Frameworks in the Partially Edentulous Jaw: A 5‐Year Follow‐up Study</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Anders</namePart><namePart type="family">Örtorp</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">LDS</namePart><affiliation>Assistant Professor, Head of Prosthetic Division, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Gothenburg, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Torsten</namePart><namePart type="family">Jemt</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">LDS, Odont Dr</namePart><affiliation>Associate Professor, Head of Prosthetic Division, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Gothenburg, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1999-10</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1999</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="references">32</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">2</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Background: Titanium frameworks have been used in the endentulous implant patient for the last 10 years. However, knowledge of titanium frameworks for the partially dentate patient is limited. Purpose: To report the 5‐year clinical performance of implant‐supported prostheses with laser‐welded titanium frameworks in the partially edentulous jaw. Materials and Methods: A consecutive group of 383 partially edentulous patients were, on a routine basis, provided with fixed partial prostheses supported by Brånemark implants in the mandible or maxilla. Besides conventional frameworks in cast gold alloy, 58 patients were provided with titanium frameworks with three different veneering techniques, and clinical and radiographic 5‐year data were collected for this group. Results: The overall cumulative survival rate was 95.6% for titanium‐framework prostheses and 93.6% for implants. Average bone loss during the follow‐up period was 0.4 mm. The most common complications were minor veneering fractures. Loose and fractured implant screw components were fewer than 2%. An observation was that patients on medications for cardiovascular problems may lose more implants than others (p <.05). Conclusions: The clinical performance of prostheses with implant‐supported laser‐welded titanium frameworks was similar to that reported for conventional cast frames in partially edentulous jaws. Low‐fusing porcelain veneers also showed clinical performance comparable to that reported for conventional porcelain‐fused‐to‐metal techniques.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>implant‐supported</topic><topic>laser‐welded titanium</topic><topic>partially edentulous</topic><topic>protheses</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1523-0899</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CID</identifier><part><date>1999</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>1</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>84</start><end>91</end><total>8</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">D3152C75314A984B3D100045DE4923BAB1E441C8</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-F3SPBFWC-D</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.1999.tb00096.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CID84</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D3152C75314A984B3D100045DE4923BAB1E441C8/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 006881 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 006881 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:D3152C75314A984B3D100045DE4923BAB1E441C8
|texte= Clinical Experiences of Implant‐Supported Prostheses with Laser‐Welded Titanium Frameworks in the Partially Edentulous Jaw: A 5‐Year Follow‐up Study
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |