Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Corlett on Kant, Hegel, and Retribution

Identifieur interne : 005653 ( Istex/Curation ); précédent : 005652; suivant : 005654

Corlett on Kant, Hegel, and Retribution

Auteurs : Thom Brooks

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:AD9411BBFAD1472A829E9F27D034B6C970BDE1C2

Abstract

The purpose of this essay is to critically appraise J. Angelo Corlett's recent interpretation of Kant's theory of punishment as well as his rejection of Hegel's penology. In taking Kant to be a retributivist at a primary level and a proponent of deterrence at a secondary level, I believe Corlett has inappropriately wed together Kant's distinction between moral and positive law. Moreover, his support of Kant on these grounds is misguided as it is instead Hegel who holds such a distinction. Finally, I attempt to refute the almost timeless retributivist rejection of deterrence-based theories of punishment on the grounds that the latter somehow would condone in some cases the punishment of innocent persons. These individuals almost always demand that no innocent person be punished as a rule of the highest order.

Url:
DOI: 10.1017/S0031819101000560

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:AD9411BBFAD1472A829E9F27D034B6C970BDE1C2

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Corlett on Kant, Hegel, and Retribution</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Brooks, Thom" sort="Brooks, Thom" uniqKey="Brooks T" first="Thom" last="Brooks">Thom Brooks</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:AD9411BBFAD1472A829E9F27D034B6C970BDE1C2</idno>
<date when="2002" year="2002">2002</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1017/S0031819101000560</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/AD9411BBFAD1472A829E9F27D034B6C970BDE1C2/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">005653</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">005653</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">005653</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a">Corlett on Kant, Hegel, and Retribution</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Brooks, Thom" sort="Brooks, Thom" uniqKey="Brooks T" first="Thom" last="Brooks">Thom Brooks</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">Philosophy</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0031-8191</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1469-817X</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>Cambridge University Press</publisher>
<pubPlace>Cambridge, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2001-10">2001-10</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">76</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="561">561</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="580">580</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0031-8191</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0031-8191</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract">The purpose of this essay is to critically appraise J. Angelo Corlett's recent interpretation of Kant's theory of punishment as well as his rejection of Hegel's penology. In taking Kant to be a retributivist at a primary level and a proponent of deterrence at a secondary level, I believe Corlett has inappropriately wed together Kant's distinction between moral and positive law. Moreover, his support of Kant on these grounds is misguided as it is instead Hegel who holds such a distinction. Finally, I attempt to refute the almost timeless retributivist rejection of deterrence-based theories of punishment on the grounds that the latter somehow would condone in some cases the punishment of innocent persons. These individuals almost always demand that no innocent person be punished as a rule of the highest order.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005653 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 005653 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:AD9411BBFAD1472A829E9F27D034B6C970BDE1C2
   |texte=   Corlett on Kant, Hegel, and Retribution
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022