Oral Rehabilitation Considerations for Partially Edentulous Periodontal Patients
Identifieur interne : 004C39 ( Istex/Curation ); précédent : 004C38; suivant : 004C40Oral Rehabilitation Considerations for Partially Edentulous Periodontal Patients
Auteurs : Kunaal Dhingra [Inde]Source :
- Journal of Prosthodontics [ 1059-941X ] ; 2012-08.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Abutment teeth, Acta odontol scand, Adequate infection control, Aggressive periodontitis, Aggressive periodontitis patients, American college, Anatomical structures, Available evidence, Bone loss, Calif dent assoc, Cantilever, Cantilever extensions, Cantilever fdps, Caries, Chronic periodontitis, Clin, Clin periodontol, Complication, Complication rates, Contraindication, Conventional fdps, Conventional rdps, Critical review, Dent, Dent assoc, Dental implants, Dental prostheses, Dental prosthesis, Dentistry, Dentition, Denture, Denture base, Dhingra, Distal extension, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Fdps, Fracture, High survival rate, Implant, Implant failure, Implant loss, Implant placement, Implant prognosis, Implant success, Implant survival, Implant survival rate, Implant survival rates, Implant therapy, Implant treatment, Implantsupported, Implantsupported restorations, International journal, Lang, Limited evidence, Literature review, Longitudinal, Longitudinal studies, Longitudinal study, Marginal bone loss, Masticatory performance, Microbial infection, Observation period, Occlusal, Oral health, Oral hygiene, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral quality, Oral rehabil, Oral rehabilitation, Osseointegrated implants, Partial denture, Partial dentures, Patient preferences, Periodontal, Periodontal conditions, Periodontal disease, Periodontal health, Periodontal patients, Periodontal patients dhingra, Periodontal patients dhingra journal, Periodontal status, Periodontal support, Periodontal therapy, Periodontal tissue support, Periodontally, Periodontitis, Periodontitis patients, Periodontol, Pjetursson, Present review, Previous history, Previous tooth loss, Prognosis, Prosthesis, Prosthet, Prosthet dent, Prosthetic, Prosthodont, Prosthodontic, Prosthodontic rehabilitation, Prosthodontic therapy, Prosthodontic treatment, Prosthodontics, Prosthodontist, Prosthodontists dhingra, Pulp vitality, Rdps, Rehabil, Removable, Restoration, Risk factors, Single crowns, Splinting, Study design, Surgical, Survival rate, Survival rates, Systematic review, Systematic reviews, Technical complications, Tooth loss, Tooth structure, Treatment option, Treatment planning.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Abutment teeth, Acta odontol scand, Adequate infection control, Aggressive periodontitis, Aggressive periodontitis patients, American college, Anatomical structures, Available evidence, Bone loss, Calif dent assoc, Cantilever, Cantilever extensions, Cantilever fdps, Caries, Chronic periodontitis, Clin, Clin periodontol, Complication, Complication rates, Contraindication, Conventional fdps, Conventional rdps, Critical review, Dent, Dent assoc, Dental implants, Dental prostheses, Dental prosthesis, Dentistry, Dentition, Denture, Denture base, Dhingra, Distal extension, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Fdps, Fracture, High survival rate, Implant, Implant failure, Implant loss, Implant placement, Implant prognosis, Implant success, Implant survival, Implant survival rate, Implant survival rates, Implant therapy, Implant treatment, Implantsupported, Implantsupported restorations, International journal, Lang, Limited evidence, Literature review, Longitudinal, Longitudinal studies, Longitudinal study, Marginal bone loss, Masticatory performance, Microbial infection, Observation period, Occlusal, Oral health, Oral hygiene, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral quality, Oral rehabil, Oral rehabilitation, Osseointegrated implants, Partial denture, Partial dentures, Patient preferences, Periodontal, Periodontal conditions, Periodontal disease, Periodontal health, Periodontal patients, Periodontal patients dhingra, Periodontal patients dhingra journal, Periodontal status, Periodontal support, Periodontal therapy, Periodontal tissue support, Periodontally, Periodontitis, Periodontitis patients, Periodontol, Pjetursson, Present review, Previous history, Previous tooth loss, Prognosis, Prosthesis, Prosthet, Prosthet dent, Prosthetic, Prosthodont, Prosthodontic, Prosthodontic rehabilitation, Prosthodontic therapy, Prosthodontic treatment, Prosthodontics, Prosthodontist, Prosthodontists dhingra, Pulp vitality, Rdps, Rehabil, Removable, Restoration, Risk factors, Single crowns, Splinting, Study design, Surgical, Survival rate, Survival rates, Systematic review, Systematic reviews, Technical complications, Tooth loss, Tooth structure, Treatment option, Treatment planning.
Abstract
Traditional tooth‐supported and implant‐supported fixed/removable restorations are currently used to replace teeth lost due to periodontal disease. This article reviews the existing literature for oral rehabilitation of partially edentulous periodontal patients with various designs of removable dental prosthesis (RDP), fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) and implant‐supported single crown (SC), by addressing their (a) general features, (b) survival and complication rates, along with considerations for treatment planning in periodontal patients, and (c) preference by patients. To answer these issues, relevant articles were searched and critically analyzed, and their data were extracted. Data reviewed indicated that despite many advantages, implant‐supported restorations have higher complication rates than tooth‐supported restorations. Systematic reviews on conventional RDPs are lacking, but existing literature reviews provide limited evidence suggesting the use of RDPs with design modifications along with strict periodontal care in periodontal patients. Numerous systematic reviews on conventional FDPs and implant‐supported restorations provide a moderate level of evidence favoring their survival in periodontal patients; however, for long‐term success of these restorations, the patient's periodontal condition needs to be stabilized. In terms of patient preference, no restoration is superior, as they all are governed by their cost, advantages, and disadvantages. Thus, in the wake of existing weak evidence for prosthodontic rehabilitation of periodontal patients by these restorations (especially, conventional RDPs and for FDPs and SCs in implant‐supported restorations), longitudinal studies with standardized treatment protocol and methodology are needed to evaluate and compare tooth‐supported and implant‐supported restorations in periodontal patients with regard to survival rates, cost, maintenance, and patient‐centered outcomes.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00864.x
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :004C39
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:9916E07FEDA7E096ACE9979A9B8ACD3FF28F03E1Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Oral Rehabilitation Considerations for Partially Edentulous Periodontal Patients</title>
<author><name sortKey="Dhingra, Kunaal" sort="Dhingra, Kunaal" uniqKey="Dhingra K" first="Kunaal" last="Dhingra">Kunaal Dhingra</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontics, N.S.V.K. Sri Venkateshwara Dental College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Inde</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontics, N.S.V.K. Sri Venkateshwara Dental College, Bangalore, Karnataka</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:9916E07FEDA7E096ACE9979A9B8ACD3FF28F03E1</idno>
<date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00864.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/9916E07FEDA7E096ACE9979A9B8ACD3FF28F03E1/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">004C39</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">004C39</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">004C39</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Oral Rehabilitation Considerations for Partially Edentulous Periodontal Patients</title>
<author><name sortKey="Dhingra, Kunaal" sort="Dhingra, Kunaal" uniqKey="Dhingra K" first="Kunaal" last="Dhingra">Kunaal Dhingra</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontics, N.S.V.K. Sri Venkateshwara Dental College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Inde</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontics, N.S.V.K. Sri Venkateshwara Dental College, Bangalore, Karnataka</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Prosthodontics</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1059-941X</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1532-849X</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">21</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="494">494</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="513">513</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">20</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher>
<pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2012-08">2012-08</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">1059-941X</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1059-941X</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term>
<term>Abutment teeth</term>
<term>Acta odontol scand</term>
<term>Adequate infection control</term>
<term>Aggressive periodontitis</term>
<term>Aggressive periodontitis patients</term>
<term>American college</term>
<term>Anatomical structures</term>
<term>Available evidence</term>
<term>Bone loss</term>
<term>Calif dent assoc</term>
<term>Cantilever</term>
<term>Cantilever extensions</term>
<term>Cantilever fdps</term>
<term>Caries</term>
<term>Chronic periodontitis</term>
<term>Clin</term>
<term>Clin periodontol</term>
<term>Complication</term>
<term>Complication rates</term>
<term>Contraindication</term>
<term>Conventional fdps</term>
<term>Conventional rdps</term>
<term>Critical review</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dent assoc</term>
<term>Dental implants</term>
<term>Dental prostheses</term>
<term>Dental prosthesis</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Dentition</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Denture base</term>
<term>Dhingra</term>
<term>Distal extension</term>
<term>Edentulous</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Fdps</term>
<term>Fracture</term>
<term>High survival rate</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant failure</term>
<term>Implant loss</term>
<term>Implant placement</term>
<term>Implant prognosis</term>
<term>Implant success</term>
<term>Implant survival</term>
<term>Implant survival rate</term>
<term>Implant survival rates</term>
<term>Implant therapy</term>
<term>Implant treatment</term>
<term>Implantsupported</term>
<term>Implantsupported restorations</term>
<term>International journal</term>
<term>Lang</term>
<term>Limited evidence</term>
<term>Literature review</term>
<term>Longitudinal</term>
<term>Longitudinal studies</term>
<term>Longitudinal study</term>
<term>Marginal bone loss</term>
<term>Masticatory performance</term>
<term>Microbial infection</term>
<term>Observation period</term>
<term>Occlusal</term>
<term>Oral health</term>
<term>Oral hygiene</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Oral quality</term>
<term>Oral rehabil</term>
<term>Oral rehabilitation</term>
<term>Osseointegrated implants</term>
<term>Partial denture</term>
<term>Partial dentures</term>
<term>Patient preferences</term>
<term>Periodontal</term>
<term>Periodontal conditions</term>
<term>Periodontal disease</term>
<term>Periodontal health</term>
<term>Periodontal patients</term>
<term>Periodontal patients dhingra</term>
<term>Periodontal patients dhingra journal</term>
<term>Periodontal status</term>
<term>Periodontal support</term>
<term>Periodontal therapy</term>
<term>Periodontal tissue support</term>
<term>Periodontally</term>
<term>Periodontitis</term>
<term>Periodontitis patients</term>
<term>Periodontol</term>
<term>Pjetursson</term>
<term>Present review</term>
<term>Previous history</term>
<term>Previous tooth loss</term>
<term>Prognosis</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthet</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthetic</term>
<term>Prosthodont</term>
<term>Prosthodontic</term>
<term>Prosthodontic rehabilitation</term>
<term>Prosthodontic therapy</term>
<term>Prosthodontic treatment</term>
<term>Prosthodontics</term>
<term>Prosthodontist</term>
<term>Prosthodontists dhingra</term>
<term>Pulp vitality</term>
<term>Rdps</term>
<term>Rehabil</term>
<term>Removable</term>
<term>Restoration</term>
<term>Risk factors</term>
<term>Single crowns</term>
<term>Splinting</term>
<term>Study design</term>
<term>Surgical</term>
<term>Survival rate</term>
<term>Survival rates</term>
<term>Systematic review</term>
<term>Systematic reviews</term>
<term>Technical complications</term>
<term>Tooth loss</term>
<term>Tooth structure</term>
<term>Treatment option</term>
<term>Treatment planning</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term>
<term>Abutment teeth</term>
<term>Acta odontol scand</term>
<term>Adequate infection control</term>
<term>Aggressive periodontitis</term>
<term>Aggressive periodontitis patients</term>
<term>American college</term>
<term>Anatomical structures</term>
<term>Available evidence</term>
<term>Bone loss</term>
<term>Calif dent assoc</term>
<term>Cantilever</term>
<term>Cantilever extensions</term>
<term>Cantilever fdps</term>
<term>Caries</term>
<term>Chronic periodontitis</term>
<term>Clin</term>
<term>Clin periodontol</term>
<term>Complication</term>
<term>Complication rates</term>
<term>Contraindication</term>
<term>Conventional fdps</term>
<term>Conventional rdps</term>
<term>Critical review</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dent assoc</term>
<term>Dental implants</term>
<term>Dental prostheses</term>
<term>Dental prosthesis</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Dentition</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Denture base</term>
<term>Dhingra</term>
<term>Distal extension</term>
<term>Edentulous</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Fdps</term>
<term>Fracture</term>
<term>High survival rate</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant failure</term>
<term>Implant loss</term>
<term>Implant placement</term>
<term>Implant prognosis</term>
<term>Implant success</term>
<term>Implant survival</term>
<term>Implant survival rate</term>
<term>Implant survival rates</term>
<term>Implant therapy</term>
<term>Implant treatment</term>
<term>Implantsupported</term>
<term>Implantsupported restorations</term>
<term>International journal</term>
<term>Lang</term>
<term>Limited evidence</term>
<term>Literature review</term>
<term>Longitudinal</term>
<term>Longitudinal studies</term>
<term>Longitudinal study</term>
<term>Marginal bone loss</term>
<term>Masticatory performance</term>
<term>Microbial infection</term>
<term>Observation period</term>
<term>Occlusal</term>
<term>Oral health</term>
<term>Oral hygiene</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Oral quality</term>
<term>Oral rehabil</term>
<term>Oral rehabilitation</term>
<term>Osseointegrated implants</term>
<term>Partial denture</term>
<term>Partial dentures</term>
<term>Patient preferences</term>
<term>Periodontal</term>
<term>Periodontal conditions</term>
<term>Periodontal disease</term>
<term>Periodontal health</term>
<term>Periodontal patients</term>
<term>Periodontal patients dhingra</term>
<term>Periodontal patients dhingra journal</term>
<term>Periodontal status</term>
<term>Periodontal support</term>
<term>Periodontal therapy</term>
<term>Periodontal tissue support</term>
<term>Periodontally</term>
<term>Periodontitis</term>
<term>Periodontitis patients</term>
<term>Periodontol</term>
<term>Pjetursson</term>
<term>Present review</term>
<term>Previous history</term>
<term>Previous tooth loss</term>
<term>Prognosis</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthet</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthetic</term>
<term>Prosthodont</term>
<term>Prosthodontic</term>
<term>Prosthodontic rehabilitation</term>
<term>Prosthodontic therapy</term>
<term>Prosthodontic treatment</term>
<term>Prosthodontics</term>
<term>Prosthodontist</term>
<term>Prosthodontists dhingra</term>
<term>Pulp vitality</term>
<term>Rdps</term>
<term>Rehabil</term>
<term>Removable</term>
<term>Restoration</term>
<term>Risk factors</term>
<term>Single crowns</term>
<term>Splinting</term>
<term>Study design</term>
<term>Surgical</term>
<term>Survival rate</term>
<term>Survival rates</term>
<term>Systematic review</term>
<term>Systematic reviews</term>
<term>Technical complications</term>
<term>Tooth loss</term>
<term>Tooth structure</term>
<term>Treatment option</term>
<term>Treatment planning</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Traditional tooth‐supported and implant‐supported fixed/removable restorations are currently used to replace teeth lost due to periodontal disease. This article reviews the existing literature for oral rehabilitation of partially edentulous periodontal patients with various designs of removable dental prosthesis (RDP), fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) and implant‐supported single crown (SC), by addressing their (a) general features, (b) survival and complication rates, along with considerations for treatment planning in periodontal patients, and (c) preference by patients. To answer these issues, relevant articles were searched and critically analyzed, and their data were extracted. Data reviewed indicated that despite many advantages, implant‐supported restorations have higher complication rates than tooth‐supported restorations. Systematic reviews on conventional RDPs are lacking, but existing literature reviews provide limited evidence suggesting the use of RDPs with design modifications along with strict periodontal care in periodontal patients. Numerous systematic reviews on conventional FDPs and implant‐supported restorations provide a moderate level of evidence favoring their survival in periodontal patients; however, for long‐term success of these restorations, the patient's periodontal condition needs to be stabilized. In terms of patient preference, no restoration is superior, as they all are governed by their cost, advantages, and disadvantages. Thus, in the wake of existing weak evidence for prosthodontic rehabilitation of periodontal patients by these restorations (especially, conventional RDPs and for FDPs and SCs in implant‐supported restorations), longitudinal studies with standardized treatment protocol and methodology are needed to evaluate and compare tooth‐supported and implant‐supported restorations in periodontal patients with regard to survival rates, cost, maintenance, and patient‐centered outcomes.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004C39 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 004C39 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= Istex |étape= Curation |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:9916E07FEDA7E096ACE9979A9B8ACD3FF28F03E1 |texte= Oral Rehabilitation Considerations for Partially Edentulous Periodontal Patients }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. | ![]() |