EdenteV2, Istex, Corpus, bibRecord, 004C39

Oral Rehabilitation Considerations for Partially Edentulous Periodontal Patients

Identifieur interne : 004C39 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 004C38; suivant : 004C40

Oral Rehabilitation Considerations for Partially Edentulous Periodontal Patients

Auteurs : Kunaal Dhingra

Source :

Journal of Prosthodontics [ 1059-941X ] ; 2012-08.

RBID : ISTEX:9916E07FEDA7E096ACE9979A9B8ACD3FF28F03E1

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Abutment, Abutment teeth, Acta odontol scand, Adequate infection control, Aggressive periodontitis, Aggressive periodontitis patients, American college, Anatomical structures, Available evidence, Bone loss, Calif dent assoc, Cantilever, Cantilever extensions, Cantilever fdps, Caries, Chronic periodontitis, Clin, Clin periodontol, Complication, Complication rates, Contraindication, Conventional fdps, Conventional rdps, Critical review, Dent, Dent assoc, Dental implants, Dental prostheses, Dental prosthesis, Dentistry, Dentition, Denture, Denture base, Dhingra, Distal extension, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Fdps, Fracture, High survival rate, Implant, Implant failure, Implant loss, Implant placement, Implant prognosis, Implant success, Implant survival, Implant survival rate, Implant survival rates, Implant therapy, Implant treatment, Implantsupported, Implantsupported restorations, International journal, Lang, Limited evidence, Literature review, Longitudinal, Longitudinal studies, Longitudinal study, Marginal bone loss, Masticatory performance, Microbial infection, Observation period, Occlusal, Oral health, Oral hygiene, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral quality, Oral rehabil, Oral rehabilitation, Osseointegrated implants, Partial denture, Partial dentures, Patient preferences, Periodontal, Periodontal conditions, Periodontal disease, Periodontal health, Periodontal patients, Periodontal patients dhingra, Periodontal patients dhingra journal, Periodontal status, Periodontal support, Periodontal therapy, Periodontal tissue support, Periodontally, Periodontitis, Periodontitis patients, Periodontol, Pjetursson, Present review, Previous history, Previous tooth loss, Prognosis, Prosthesis, Prosthet, Prosthet dent, Prosthetic, Prosthodont, Prosthodontic, Prosthodontic rehabilitation, Prosthodontic therapy, Prosthodontic treatment, Prosthodontics, Prosthodontist, Prosthodontists dhingra, Pulp vitality, Rdps, Rehabil, Removable, Restoration, Risk factors, Single crowns, Splinting, Study design, Surgical, Survival rate, Survival rates, Systematic review, Systematic reviews, Technical complications, Tooth loss, Tooth structure, Treatment option, Treatment planning.
Teeft :
- Abutment, Abutment teeth, Acta odontol scand, Adequate infection control, Aggressive periodontitis, Aggressive periodontitis patients, American college, Anatomical structures, Available evidence, Bone loss, Calif dent assoc, Cantilever, Cantilever extensions, Cantilever fdps, Caries, Chronic periodontitis, Clin, Clin periodontol, Complication, Complication rates, Contraindication, Conventional fdps, Conventional rdps, Critical review, Dent, Dent assoc, Dental implants, Dental prostheses, Dental prosthesis, Dentistry, Dentition, Denture, Denture base, Dhingra, Distal extension, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Fdps, Fracture, High survival rate, Implant, Implant failure, Implant loss, Implant placement, Implant prognosis, Implant success, Implant survival, Implant survival rate, Implant survival rates, Implant therapy, Implant treatment, Implantsupported, Implantsupported restorations, International journal, Lang, Limited evidence, Literature review, Longitudinal, Longitudinal studies, Longitudinal study, Marginal bone loss, Masticatory performance, Microbial infection, Observation period, Occlusal, Oral health, Oral hygiene, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral quality, Oral rehabil, Oral rehabilitation, Osseointegrated implants, Partial denture, Partial dentures, Patient preferences, Periodontal, Periodontal conditions, Periodontal disease, Periodontal health, Periodontal patients, Periodontal patients dhingra, Periodontal patients dhingra journal, Periodontal status, Periodontal support, Periodontal therapy, Periodontal tissue support, Periodontally, Periodontitis, Periodontitis patients, Periodontol, Pjetursson, Present review, Previous history, Previous tooth loss, Prognosis, Prosthesis, Prosthet, Prosthet dent, Prosthetic, Prosthodont, Prosthodontic, Prosthodontic rehabilitation, Prosthodontic therapy, Prosthodontic treatment, Prosthodontics, Prosthodontist, Prosthodontists dhingra, Pulp vitality, Rdps, Rehabil, Removable, Restoration, Risk factors, Single crowns, Splinting, Study design, Surgical, Survival rate, Survival rates, Systematic review, Systematic reviews, Technical complications, Tooth loss, Tooth structure, Treatment option, Treatment planning.

Abstract

Traditional tooth‐supported and implant‐supported fixed/removable restorations are currently used to replace teeth lost due to periodontal disease. This article reviews the existing literature for oral rehabilitation of partially edentulous periodontal patients with various designs of removable dental prosthesis (RDP), fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) and implant‐supported single crown (SC), by addressing their (a) general features, (b) survival and complication rates, along with considerations for treatment planning in periodontal patients, and (c) preference by patients. To answer these issues, relevant articles were searched and critically analyzed, and their data were extracted. Data reviewed indicated that despite many advantages, implant‐supported restorations have higher complication rates than tooth‐supported restorations. Systematic reviews on conventional RDPs are lacking, but existing literature reviews provide limited evidence suggesting the use of RDPs with design modifications along with strict periodontal care in periodontal patients. Numerous systematic reviews on conventional FDPs and implant‐supported restorations provide a moderate level of evidence favoring their survival in periodontal patients; however, for long‐term success of these restorations, the patient's periodontal condition needs to be stabilized. In terms of patient preference, no restoration is superior, as they all are governed by their cost, advantages, and disadvantages. Thus, in the wake of existing weak evidence for prosthodontic rehabilitation of periodontal patients by these restorations (especially, conventional RDPs and for FDPs and SCs in implant‐supported restorations), longitudinal studies with standardized treatment protocol and methodology are needed to evaluate and compare tooth‐supported and implant‐supported restorations in periodontal patients with regard to survival rates, cost, maintenance, and patient‐centered outcomes.

Url:

https://api.istex.fr/document/9916E07FEDA7E096ACE9979A9B8ACD3FF28F03E1/fulltext/pdf

DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00864.x

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:9916E07FEDA7E096ACE9979A9B8ACD3FF28F03E1

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Oral Rehabilitation Considerations for Partially Edentulous Periodontal Patients</title>
<author><name sortKey="Dhingra, Kunaal" sort="Dhingra, Kunaal" uniqKey="Dhingra K" first="Kunaal" last="Dhingra">Kunaal Dhingra</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontics, N.S.V.K. Sri Venkateshwara Dental College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:9916E07FEDA7E096ACE9979A9B8ACD3FF28F03E1</idno>
<date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00864.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/9916E07FEDA7E096ACE9979A9B8ACD3FF28F03E1/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">004C39</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">004C39</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Oral Rehabilitation Considerations for Partially Edentulous Periodontal Patients</title>
<author><name sortKey="Dhingra, Kunaal" sort="Dhingra, Kunaal" uniqKey="Dhingra K" first="Kunaal" last="Dhingra">Kunaal Dhingra</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontics, N.S.V.K. Sri Venkateshwara Dental College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Prosthodontics</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1059-941X</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1532-849X</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">21</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="494">494</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="513">513</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">20</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher>
<pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2012-08">2012-08</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">1059-941X</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1059-941X</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term>
<term>Abutment teeth</term>
<term>Acta odontol scand</term>
<term>Adequate infection control</term>
<term>Aggressive periodontitis</term>
<term>Aggressive periodontitis patients</term>
<term>American college</term>
<term>Anatomical structures</term>
<term>Available evidence</term>
<term>Bone loss</term>
<term>Calif dent assoc</term>
<term>Cantilever</term>
<term>Cantilever extensions</term>
<term>Cantilever fdps</term>
<term>Caries</term>
<term>Chronic periodontitis</term>
<term>Clin</term>
<term>Clin periodontol</term>
<term>Complication</term>
<term>Complication rates</term>
<term>Contraindication</term>
<term>Conventional fdps</term>
<term>Conventional rdps</term>
<term>Critical review</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dent assoc</term>
<term>Dental implants</term>
<term>Dental prostheses</term>
<term>Dental prosthesis</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Dentition</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Denture base</term>
<term>Dhingra</term>
<term>Distal extension</term>
<term>Edentulous</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Fdps</term>
<term>Fracture</term>
<term>High survival rate</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant failure</term>
<term>Implant loss</term>
<term>Implant placement</term>
<term>Implant prognosis</term>
<term>Implant success</term>
<term>Implant survival</term>
<term>Implant survival rate</term>
<term>Implant survival rates</term>
<term>Implant therapy</term>
<term>Implant treatment</term>
<term>Implantsupported</term>
<term>Implantsupported restorations</term>
<term>International journal</term>
<term>Lang</term>
<term>Limited evidence</term>
<term>Literature review</term>
<term>Longitudinal</term>
<term>Longitudinal studies</term>
<term>Longitudinal study</term>
<term>Marginal bone loss</term>
<term>Masticatory performance</term>
<term>Microbial infection</term>
<term>Observation period</term>
<term>Occlusal</term>
<term>Oral health</term>
<term>Oral hygiene</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Oral quality</term>
<term>Oral rehabil</term>
<term>Oral rehabilitation</term>
<term>Osseointegrated implants</term>
<term>Partial denture</term>
<term>Partial dentures</term>
<term>Patient preferences</term>
<term>Periodontal</term>
<term>Periodontal conditions</term>
<term>Periodontal disease</term>
<term>Periodontal health</term>
<term>Periodontal patients</term>
<term>Periodontal patients dhingra</term>
<term>Periodontal patients dhingra journal</term>
<term>Periodontal status</term>
<term>Periodontal support</term>
<term>Periodontal therapy</term>
<term>Periodontal tissue support</term>
<term>Periodontally</term>
<term>Periodontitis</term>
<term>Periodontitis patients</term>
<term>Periodontol</term>
<term>Pjetursson</term>
<term>Present review</term>
<term>Previous history</term>
<term>Previous tooth loss</term>
<term>Prognosis</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthet</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthetic</term>
<term>Prosthodont</term>
<term>Prosthodontic</term>
<term>Prosthodontic rehabilitation</term>
<term>Prosthodontic therapy</term>
<term>Prosthodontic treatment</term>
<term>Prosthodontics</term>
<term>Prosthodontist</term>
<term>Prosthodontists dhingra</term>
<term>Pulp vitality</term>
<term>Rdps</term>
<term>Rehabil</term>
<term>Removable</term>
<term>Restoration</term>
<term>Risk factors</term>
<term>Single crowns</term>
<term>Splinting</term>
<term>Study design</term>
<term>Surgical</term>
<term>Survival rate</term>
<term>Survival rates</term>
<term>Systematic review</term>
<term>Systematic reviews</term>
<term>Technical complications</term>
<term>Tooth loss</term>
<term>Tooth structure</term>
<term>Treatment option</term>
<term>Treatment planning</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term>
<term>Abutment teeth</term>
<term>Acta odontol scand</term>
<term>Adequate infection control</term>
<term>Aggressive periodontitis</term>
<term>Aggressive periodontitis patients</term>
<term>American college</term>
<term>Anatomical structures</term>
<term>Available evidence</term>
<term>Bone loss</term>
<term>Calif dent assoc</term>
<term>Cantilever</term>
<term>Cantilever extensions</term>
<term>Cantilever fdps</term>
<term>Caries</term>
<term>Chronic periodontitis</term>
<term>Clin</term>
<term>Clin periodontol</term>
<term>Complication</term>
<term>Complication rates</term>
<term>Contraindication</term>
<term>Conventional fdps</term>
<term>Conventional rdps</term>
<term>Critical review</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dent assoc</term>
<term>Dental implants</term>
<term>Dental prostheses</term>
<term>Dental prosthesis</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Dentition</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Denture base</term>
<term>Dhingra</term>
<term>Distal extension</term>
<term>Edentulous</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Fdps</term>
<term>Fracture</term>
<term>High survival rate</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant failure</term>
<term>Implant loss</term>
<term>Implant placement</term>
<term>Implant prognosis</term>
<term>Implant success</term>
<term>Implant survival</term>
<term>Implant survival rate</term>
<term>Implant survival rates</term>
<term>Implant therapy</term>
<term>Implant treatment</term>
<term>Implantsupported</term>
<term>Implantsupported restorations</term>
<term>International journal</term>
<term>Lang</term>
<term>Limited evidence</term>
<term>Literature review</term>
<term>Longitudinal</term>
<term>Longitudinal studies</term>
<term>Longitudinal study</term>
<term>Marginal bone loss</term>
<term>Masticatory performance</term>
<term>Microbial infection</term>
<term>Observation period</term>
<term>Occlusal</term>
<term>Oral health</term>
<term>Oral hygiene</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Oral quality</term>
<term>Oral rehabil</term>
<term>Oral rehabilitation</term>
<term>Osseointegrated implants</term>
<term>Partial denture</term>
<term>Partial dentures</term>
<term>Patient preferences</term>
<term>Periodontal</term>
<term>Periodontal conditions</term>
<term>Periodontal disease</term>
<term>Periodontal health</term>
<term>Periodontal patients</term>
<term>Periodontal patients dhingra</term>
<term>Periodontal patients dhingra journal</term>
<term>Periodontal status</term>
<term>Periodontal support</term>
<term>Periodontal therapy</term>
<term>Periodontal tissue support</term>
<term>Periodontally</term>
<term>Periodontitis</term>
<term>Periodontitis patients</term>
<term>Periodontol</term>
<term>Pjetursson</term>
<term>Present review</term>
<term>Previous history</term>
<term>Previous tooth loss</term>
<term>Prognosis</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthet</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthetic</term>
<term>Prosthodont</term>
<term>Prosthodontic</term>
<term>Prosthodontic rehabilitation</term>
<term>Prosthodontic therapy</term>
<term>Prosthodontic treatment</term>
<term>Prosthodontics</term>
<term>Prosthodontist</term>
<term>Prosthodontists dhingra</term>
<term>Pulp vitality</term>
<term>Rdps</term>
<term>Rehabil</term>
<term>Removable</term>
<term>Restoration</term>
<term>Risk factors</term>
<term>Single crowns</term>
<term>Splinting</term>
<term>Study design</term>
<term>Surgical</term>
<term>Survival rate</term>
<term>Survival rates</term>
<term>Systematic review</term>
<term>Systematic reviews</term>
<term>Technical complications</term>
<term>Tooth loss</term>
<term>Tooth structure</term>
<term>Treatment option</term>
<term>Treatment planning</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Traditional tooth‐supported and implant‐supported fixed/removable restorations are currently used to replace teeth lost due to periodontal disease. This article reviews the existing literature for oral rehabilitation of partially edentulous periodontal patients with various designs of removable dental prosthesis (RDP), fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) and implant‐supported single crown (SC), by addressing their (a) general features, (b) survival and complication rates, along with considerations for treatment planning in periodontal patients, and (c) preference by patients. To answer these issues, relevant articles were searched and critically analyzed, and their data were extracted. Data reviewed indicated that despite many advantages, implant‐supported restorations have higher complication rates than tooth‐supported restorations. Systematic reviews on conventional RDPs are lacking, but existing literature reviews provide limited evidence suggesting the use of RDPs with design modifications along with strict periodontal care in periodontal patients. Numerous systematic reviews on conventional FDPs and implant‐supported restorations provide a moderate level of evidence favoring their survival in periodontal patients; however, for long‐term success of these restorations, the patient's periodontal condition needs to be stabilized. In terms of patient preference, no restoration is superior, as they all are governed by their cost, advantages, and disadvantages. Thus, in the wake of existing weak evidence for prosthodontic rehabilitation of periodontal patients by these restorations (especially, conventional RDPs and for FDPs and SCs in implant‐supported restorations), longitudinal studies with standardized treatment protocol and methodology are needed to evaluate and compare tooth‐supported and implant‐supported restorations in periodontal patients with regard to survival rates, cost, maintenance, and patient‐centered outcomes.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName>
<keywords><teeft><json:string>periodontal</json:string>
<json:string>fdps</json:string>
<json:string>implant</json:string>
<json:string>periodontitis</json:string>
<json:string>abutment</json:string>
<json:string>denture</json:string>
<json:string>periodontally</json:string>
<json:string>rdps</json:string>
<json:string>prosthesis</json:string>
<json:string>clin</json:string>
<json:string>cantilever</json:string>
<json:string>prosthodontics</json:string>
<json:string>abutment teeth</json:string>
<json:string>dhingra</json:string>
<json:string>systematic review</json:string>
<json:string>oral rehabilitation</json:string>
<json:string>american college</json:string>
<json:string>prosthodontist</json:string>
<json:string>removable</json:string>
<json:string>edentulous patients</json:string>
<json:string>edentulous</json:string>
<json:string>survival rates</json:string>
<json:string>prosthet</json:string>
<json:string>partial dentures</json:string>
<json:string>prosthet dent</json:string>
<json:string>complication rates</json:string>
<json:string>oral rehabil</json:string>
<json:string>rehabil</json:string>
<json:string>periodontol</json:string>
<json:string>periodontal patients</json:string>
<json:string>prosthodontic</json:string>
<json:string>tooth loss</json:string>
<json:string>implant treatment</json:string>
<json:string>periodontal health</json:string>
<json:string>contraindication</json:string>
<json:string>pjetursson</json:string>
<json:string>periodontal disease</json:string>
<json:string>occlusal</json:string>
<json:string>survival rate</json:string>
<json:string>prosthetic</json:string>
<json:string>periodontitis patients</json:string>
<json:string>fracture</json:string>
<json:string>conventional rdps</json:string>
<json:string>implantsupported</json:string>
<json:string>dent</json:string>
<json:string>dentition</json:string>
<json:string>caries</json:string>
<json:string>prosthodont</json:string>
<json:string>systematic reviews</json:string>
<json:string>clin periodontol</json:string>
<json:string>technical complications</json:string>
<json:string>conventional fdps</json:string>
<json:string>implant therapy</json:string>
<json:string>aggressive periodontitis</json:string>
<json:string>observation period</json:string>
<json:string>dental implants</json:string>
<json:string>implant survival</json:string>
<json:string>marginal bone loss</json:string>
<json:string>complication</json:string>
<json:string>splinting</json:string>
<json:string>present review</json:string>
<json:string>dental prostheses</json:string>
<json:string>denture base</json:string>
<json:string>cantilever fdps</json:string>
<json:string>chronic periodontitis</json:string>
<json:string>bone loss</json:string>
<json:string>longitudinal study</json:string>
<json:string>longitudinal</json:string>
<json:string>previous tooth loss</json:string>
<json:string>tooth structure</json:string>
<json:string>dental prosthesis</json:string>
<json:string>periodontal support</json:string>
<json:string>oral hygiene</json:string>
<json:string>periodontal patients dhingra journal</json:string>
<json:string>critical review</json:string>
<json:string>high survival rate</json:string>
<json:string>single crowns</json:string>
<json:string>implant failure</json:string>
<json:string>longitudinal studies</json:string>
<json:string>acta odontol scand</json:string>
<json:string>treatment planning</json:string>
<json:string>periodontal patients dhingra</json:string>
<json:string>periodontal conditions</json:string>
<json:string>surgical</json:string>
<json:string>prognosis</json:string>
<json:string>dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>lang</json:string>
<json:string>restoration</json:string>
<json:string>distal extension</json:string>
<json:string>implant prognosis</json:string>
<json:string>microbial infection</json:string>
<json:string>study design</json:string>
<json:string>implant loss</json:string>
<json:string>periodontal status</json:string>
<json:string>previous history</json:string>
<json:string>implant survival rates</json:string>
<json:string>implant survival rate</json:string>
<json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string>
<json:string>implant success</json:string>
<json:string>aggressive periodontitis patients</json:string>
<json:string>adequate infection control</json:string>
<json:string>masticatory performance</json:string>
<json:string>cantilever extensions</json:string>
<json:string>prosthodontists dhingra</json:string>
<json:string>oral health</json:string>
<json:string>prosthodontic therapy</json:string>
<json:string>oral quality</json:string>
<json:string>implant placement</json:string>
<json:string>prosthodontic rehabilitation</json:string>
<json:string>treatment option</json:string>
<json:string>limited evidence</json:string>
<json:string>prosthodontic treatment</json:string>
<json:string>anatomical structures</json:string>
<json:string>periodontal tissue support</json:string>
<json:string>implantsupported restorations</json:string>
<json:string>partial denture</json:string>
<json:string>dent assoc</json:string>
<json:string>literature review</json:string>
<json:string>periodontal therapy</json:string>
<json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string>
<json:string>international journal</json:string>
<json:string>risk factors</json:string>
<json:string>patient preferences</json:string>
<json:string>calif dent assoc</json:string>
<json:string>pulp vitality</json:string>
<json:string>available evidence</json:string>
</teeft>
</keywords>
<author><json:item><name>Kunaal Dhingra BDS, MDS</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontics, N.S.V.K. Sri Venkateshwara Dental College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
</author>
<subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>Dental implants</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>implant‐supported dental prosthesis</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>fixed partial denture</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>removable partial denture</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>partially edentulous jaw</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>periodontitis</value>
</json:item>
</subject>
<articleId><json:string>JOPR864</json:string>
</articleId>
<arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-9NTJ7LV9-P</arkIstex>
<language><json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string>
</originalGenre>
<abstract>Traditional tooth‐supported and implant‐supported fixed/removable restorations are currently used to replace teeth lost due to periodontal disease. This article reviews the existing literature for oral rehabilitation of partially edentulous periodontal patients with various designs of removable dental prosthesis (RDP), fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) and implant‐supported single crown (SC), by addressing their (a) general features, (b) survival and complication rates, along with considerations for treatment planning in periodontal patients, and (c) preference by patients. To answer these issues, relevant articles were searched and critically analyzed, and their data were extracted. Data reviewed indicated that despite many advantages, implant‐supported restorations have higher complication rates than tooth‐supported restorations. Systematic reviews on conventional RDPs are lacking, but existing literature reviews provide limited evidence suggesting the use of RDPs with design modifications along with strict periodontal care in periodontal patients. Numerous systematic reviews on conventional FDPs and implant‐supported restorations provide a moderate level of evidence favoring their survival in periodontal patients; however, for long‐term success of these restorations, the patient's periodontal condition needs to be stabilized. In terms of patient preference, no restoration is superior, as they all are governed by their cost, advantages, and disadvantages. Thus, in the wake of existing weak evidence for prosthodontic rehabilitation of periodontal patients by these restorations (especially, conventional RDPs and for FDPs and SCs in implant‐supported restorations), longitudinal studies with standardized treatment protocol and methodology are needed to evaluate and compare tooth‐supported and implant‐supported restorations in periodontal patients with regard to survival rates, cost, maintenance, and patient‐centered outcomes.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative>
<abstractWordCount>250</abstractWordCount>
<abstractCharCount>1953</abstractCharCount>
<keywordCount>6</keywordCount>
<score>10</score>
<pdfWordCount>11612</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>83869</pdfCharCount>
<pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageCount>20</pdfPageCount>
<pdfPageSize>595.274 x 782.286 pts</pdfPageSize>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>Oral Rehabilitation Considerations for Partially Edentulous Periodontal Patients</title>
<pmid><json:string>22681519</json:string>
</pmid>
<genre><json:string>article</json:string>
</genre>
<host><title>Journal of Prosthodontics</title>
<language><json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1532-849X</json:string>
</doi>
<issn><json:string>1059-941X</json:string>
</issn>
<eissn><json:string>1532-849X</json:string>
</eissn>
<publisherId><json:string>JOPR</json:string>
</publisherId>
<volume>21</volume>
<issue>6</issue>
<pages><first>494</first>
<last>513</last>
<total>20</total>
</pages>
<genre><json:string>journal</json:string>
</genre>
</host>
<namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2011</json:string>
<json:string>2012</json:string>
<json:string>2439</json:string>
<json:string>1960</json:string>
<json:string>1991</json:string>
<json:string>1980</json:string>
</date>
<geogName></geogName>
<orgName><json:string>American College of Prosthodontists Restoration Table</json:string>
<json:string>American College of Prosthodontists Objectives To</json:string>
<json:string>India Keywords Dental</json:string>
<json:string>American College of Prosthodontists Objectives Journal of Prosthodontics</json:string>
<json:string>American College of Prosthodontists FDP</json:string>
<json:string>American College of Prosthodontists Dhingra</json:string>
<json:string>American College of Prosthodontists Continued</json:string>
<json:string>American College of Prosthodontists To</json:string>
<json:string>Clinical Oral Implants Research, Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</json:string>
<json:string>American Academy of Periodontology</json:string>
<json:string>American College of Prosthodontists</json:string>
<json:string>American Dental Association Web site</json:string>
<json:string>Prosthodontics, International Journal</json:string>
</orgName>
<orgName_funder></orgName_funder>
<orgName_provider></orgName_provider>
<persName><json:string>Studies</json:string>
<json:string>Systematic</json:string>
<json:string>Professor</json:string>
<json:string>Conventional</json:string>
<json:string>Results</json:string>
<json:string>Dhingra</json:string>
<json:string>Continued</json:string>
<json:string>Author</json:string>
<json:string>Oral</json:string>
<json:string>Data</json:string>
<json:string>N.S.V.K. Sri</json:string>
<json:string>To</json:string>
<json:string>Journal</json:string>
<json:string>Recent</json:string>
<json:string>Al-Zahrani</json:string>
</persName>
<placeName><json:string>Bangalore</json:string>
<json:string>India</json:string>
</placeName>
<ref_url></ref_url>
<ref_bibl><json:string>Quirynen et al</json:string>
<json:string>Kourkouta et al</json:string>
<json:string>Bassi et al</json:string>
<json:string>Karoussis et al</json:string>
<json:string>Kanno et al</json:string>
<json:string>Himmel et al</json:string>
<json:string>Schou et al (2006)</json:string>
<json:string>Hansen et al</json:string>
<json:string>Karoussis et al (2007)</json:string>
<json:string>Ong et al (2008)</json:string>
<json:string>Lulic et al</json:string>
<json:string>Klokkevold and Han (2007)</json:string>
<json:string>Grossmann et al</json:string>
<json:string>Renvert and Persson (2009)</json:string>
<json:string>Pjetursson et al</json:string>
<json:string>Rissin et al</json:string>
<json:string>Van der Weijden et al</json:string>
</ref_bibl>
<bibl></bibl>
</unitex>
</namedEntities>
<ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-9NTJ7LV9-P</json:string>
</ark>
<categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string>
<json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string>
</wos>
<scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string>
<json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string>
</scienceMetrix>
<scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string>
</scopus>
<inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string>
<json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string>
<json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string>
<json:string>4 - maladies metaboliques</json:string>
</inist>
</categories>
<publicationDate>2012</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>2012</copyrightDate>
<doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00864.x</json:string>
</doi>
<id>9916E07FEDA7E096ACE9979A9B8ACD3FF28F03E1</id>
<score>1</score>
<fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension>
<original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9916E07FEDA7E096ACE9979A9B8ACD3FF28F03E1/fulltext/pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item><extension>zip</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9916E07FEDA7E096ACE9979A9B8ACD3FF28F03E1/fulltext/zip</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/9916E07FEDA7E096ACE9979A9B8ACD3FF28F03E1/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Oral Rehabilitation Considerations for Partially Edentulous Periodontal Patients</title>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher>
<pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace>
<availability><licence>© 2012 by the American College of Prosthodontists</licence>
</availability>
<date type="published" when="2012-08"></date>
</publicationStmt>
<notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note>
<note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note>
</notesStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Oral Rehabilitation Considerations for Partially Edentulous Periodontal Patients</title>
<title level="a" type="short">Oral Rehabilitation of Periodontal Patients</title>
<author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Kunaal</forename>
<surname>Dhingra</surname>
<roleName type="degree">BDS, MDS</roleName>
</persName>
<affiliation>Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontics, N.S.V.K. Sri Venkateshwara Dental College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India<address><country key="IN"></country>
</address>
</affiliation>
</author>
<idno type="istex">9916E07FEDA7E096ACE9979A9B8ACD3FF28F03E1</idno>
<idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-9NTJ7LV9-P</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00864.x</idno>
<idno type="unit">JOPR864</idno>
<idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JOPR.JOPR864.pdf</idno>
</analytic>
<monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Prosthodontics</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS</title>
<idno type="pISSN">1059-941X</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1532-849X</idno>
<idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1532-849X</idno>
<idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/jopr.2012.21.issue-6</idno>
<idno type="product">JOPR</idno>
<idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">21</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="494">494</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="513">513</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">20</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher>
<pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2012-08"></date>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>Abstract</head>
<p>Traditional tooth‐supported and implant‐supported fixed/removable restorations are currently used to replace teeth lost due to periodontal disease. This article reviews the existing literature for oral rehabilitation of partially edentulous periodontal patients with various designs of removable dental prosthesis (RDP), fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) and implant‐supported single crown (SC), by addressing their (a) general features, (b) survival and complication rates, along with considerations for treatment planning in periodontal patients, and (c) preference by patients. To answer these issues, relevant articles were searched and critically analyzed, and their data were extracted. Data reviewed indicated that despite many advantages, implant‐supported restorations have higher complication rates than tooth‐supported restorations. Systematic reviews on conventional RDPs are lacking, but existing literature reviews provide limited evidence suggesting the use of RDPs with design modifications along with strict periodontal care in periodontal patients. Numerous systematic reviews on conventional FDPs and implant‐supported restorations provide a moderate level of evidence favoring their survival in periodontal patients; however, for long‐term success of these restorations, the patient's periodontal condition needs to be stabilized. In terms of patient preference, no restoration is superior, as they all are governed by their cost, advantages, and disadvantages. Thus, in the wake of existing weak evidence for prosthodontic rehabilitation of periodontal patients by these restorations (especially, conventional RDPs and for FDPs and SCs in implant‐supported restorations), longitudinal studies with standardized treatment protocol and methodology are needed to evaluate and compare tooth‐supported and implant‐supported restorations in periodontal patients with regard to survival rates, cost, maintenance, and patient‐centered outcomes.</p>
</abstract>
<textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">Dental implants</term>
<term xml:id="k2">implant‐supported dental prosthesis</term>
<term xml:id="k3">fixed partial denture</term>
<term xml:id="k4">removable partial denture</term>
<term xml:id="k5">partially edentulous jaw</term>
<term xml:id="k6">periodontitis</term>
</keywords>
<keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en"></language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
<json:item><extension>txt</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9916E07FEDA7E096ACE9979A9B8ACD3FF28F03E1/fulltext/txt</uri>
</json:item>
</fulltext>
<metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisherName>
<publisherLoc>Malden, USA</publisherLoc>
</publisherInfo>
<doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1532-849X</doi>
<issn type="print">1059-941X</issn>
<issn type="electronic">1532-849X</issn>
<idGroup><id type="product" value="JOPR"></id>
<id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id>
</idGroup>
<titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS">Journal of Prosthodontics</title>
<title type="subtitle">Implant, Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry</title>
</titleGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="part" position="08106"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/jopr.2012.21.issue-6</doi>
<numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="21">21</numbering>
<numbering type="journalIssue" number="6">6</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<coverDate startDate="2012-08">August 2012</coverDate>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="11" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00864.x</doi>
<idGroup><id type="unit" value="JOPR864"></id>
</idGroup>
<countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="20"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title>
</titleGroup>
<copyright>© 2012 by the American College of Prosthodontists</copyright>
<eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:3.1.6 mode:FullText" date="2012-08-22"></event>
<event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2012-06-09"></event>
<event type="firstOnline" date="2012-06-09"></event>
<event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2012-08-22"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-31"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.3.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-02-25"></event>
</eventGroup>
<numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="494">494</numbering>
<numbering type="pageLast" number="513">513</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<correspondenceTo>Kunaal Dhingra, Dept. of Periodontics, N.S.V.K. Sri Venkateshwara Dental College, Bangalore, Karnataka 560083, India. E‐mail: <email>kunaaldhingra@yahoo.co.in</email>
</correspondenceTo>
<linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JOPR.JOPR864.pdf"></link>
</linkGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted December 17, 2011</unparsedEditorialHistory>
<countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count>
<count type="tableTotal" number="2"></count>
<count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count>
<count type="referenceTotal" number="120"></count>
<count type="linksCrossRef" number="201"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup><title type="main">Oral Rehabilitation Considerations for Partially Edentulous Periodontal Patients</title>
<title type="shortAuthors">Dhingra</title>
<title type="short">Oral Rehabilitation of Periodontal Patients</title>
</titleGroup>
<creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Kunaal</givenNames>
<familyName>Dhingra</familyName>
<degrees>BDS, MDS</degrees>
</personName>
</creator>
</creators>
<affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="IN"><unparsedAffiliation>Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontics, N.S.V.K. Sri Venkateshwara Dental College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
</affiliationGroup>
<keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">Dental implants</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k2">implant‐supported dental prosthesis</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k3">fixed partial denture</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k4">removable partial denture</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k5">partially edentulous jaw</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k6">periodontitis</keyword>
</keywordGroup>
<abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title>
<p>Traditional tooth‐supported and implant‐supported fixed/removable restorations are currently used to replace teeth lost due to periodontal disease. This article reviews the existing literature for oral rehabilitation of partially edentulous periodontal patients with various designs of removable dental prosthesis (RDP), fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) and implant‐supported single crown (SC), by addressing their (a) general features, (b) survival and complication rates, along with considerations for treatment planning in periodontal patients, and (c) preference by patients. To answer these issues, relevant articles were searched and critically analyzed, and their data were extracted. Data reviewed indicated that despite many advantages, implant‐supported restorations have higher complication rates than tooth‐supported restorations. Systematic reviews on conventional RDPs are lacking, but existing literature reviews provide limited evidence suggesting the use of RDPs with design modifications along with strict periodontal care in periodontal patients. Numerous systematic reviews on conventional FDPs and implant‐supported restorations provide a moderate level of evidence favoring their survival in periodontal patients; however, for long‐term success of these restorations, the patient's periodontal condition needs to be stabilized. In terms of patient preference, no restoration is superior, as they all are governed by their cost, advantages, and disadvantages. Thus, in the wake of existing weak evidence for prosthodontic rehabilitation of periodontal patients by these restorations (especially, conventional RDPs and for FDPs and SCs in implant‐supported restorations), longitudinal studies with standardized treatment protocol and methodology are needed to evaluate and compare tooth‐supported and implant‐supported restorations in periodontal patients with regard to survival rates, cost, maintenance, and patient‐centered outcomes.</p>
</abstract>
</abstractGroup>
</contentMeta>
<noteGroup><note xml:id="n-fnt-1"><p><i>The author declares no conflict of interest or source of funding related to this review.</i>
</p>
</note>
</noteGroup>
</header>
</component>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Oral Rehabilitation Considerations for Partially Edentulous Periodontal Patients</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Oral Rehabilitation of Periodontal Patients</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Oral Rehabilitation Considerations for Partially Edentulous Periodontal Patients</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Kunaal</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Dhingra</namePart>
<namePart type="termsOfAddress">BDS, MDS</namePart>
<affiliation>Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontics, N.S.V.K. Sri Venkateshwara Dental College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre>
<originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher>
<place><placeTerm type="text">Malden, USA</placeTerm>
</place>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2012-08</dateIssued>
<edition>Accepted December 17, 2011</edition>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">0</extent>
<extent unit="tables">2</extent>
<extent unit="formulas">0</extent>
<extent unit="references">120</extent>
<extent unit="linksCrossRef">201</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract lang="en">Traditional tooth‐supported and implant‐supported fixed/removable restorations are currently used to replace teeth lost due to periodontal disease. This article reviews the existing literature for oral rehabilitation of partially edentulous periodontal patients with various designs of removable dental prosthesis (RDP), fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) and implant‐supported single crown (SC), by addressing their (a) general features, (b) survival and complication rates, along with considerations for treatment planning in periodontal patients, and (c) preference by patients. To answer these issues, relevant articles were searched and critically analyzed, and their data were extracted. Data reviewed indicated that despite many advantages, implant‐supported restorations have higher complication rates than tooth‐supported restorations. Systematic reviews on conventional RDPs are lacking, but existing literature reviews provide limited evidence suggesting the use of RDPs with design modifications along with strict periodontal care in periodontal patients. Numerous systematic reviews on conventional FDPs and implant‐supported restorations provide a moderate level of evidence favoring their survival in periodontal patients; however, for long‐term success of these restorations, the patient's periodontal condition needs to be stabilized. In terms of patient preference, no restoration is superior, as they all are governed by their cost, advantages, and disadvantages. Thus, in the wake of existing weak evidence for prosthodontic rehabilitation of periodontal patients by these restorations (especially, conventional RDPs and for FDPs and SCs in implant‐supported restorations), longitudinal studies with standardized treatment protocol and methodology are needed to evaluate and compare tooth‐supported and implant‐supported restorations in periodontal patients with regard to survival rates, cost, maintenance, and patient‐centered outcomes.</abstract>
<subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre>
<topic>Dental implants</topic>
<topic>implant‐supported dental prosthesis</topic>
<topic>fixed partial denture</topic>
<topic>removable partial denture</topic>
<topic>partially edentulous jaw</topic>
<topic>periodontitis</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Prosthodontics</title>
<subTitle>Implant, Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry</subTitle>
</titleInfo>
<genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre>
<identifier type="ISSN">1059-941X</identifier>
<identifier type="eISSN">1532-849X</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1532-849X</identifier>
<identifier type="PublisherID">JOPR</identifier>
<part><date>2012</date>
<detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption>
<number>21</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption>
<number>6</number>
</detail>
<extent unit="pages"><start>494</start>
<end>513</end>
<total>20</total>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">9916E07FEDA7E096ACE9979A9B8ACD3FF28F03E1</identifier>
<identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-9NTJ7LV9-P</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00864.x</identifier>
<identifier type="ArticleID">JOPR864</identifier>
<accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2012 by the American College of Prosthodontists</accessCondition>
<recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource>
<recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Inc</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
<json:item><extension>json</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/json</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9916E07FEDA7E096ACE9979A9B8ACD3FF28F03E1/metadata/json</uri>
</json:item>
</metadata>
<serie></serie>
</istex>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004C39 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 004C39 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:9916E07FEDA7E096ACE9979A9B8ACD3FF28F03E1
   |texte=   Oral Rehabilitation Considerations for Partially Edentulous Periodontal Patients
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022

	Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Oral Rehabilitation Considerations for Partially Edentulous Periodontal Patients

Oral Rehabilitation Considerations for Partially Edentulous Periodontal Patients

Source :

English descriptors

Abstract

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri