A randomised trial of a simplified method for complete denture fabrication: patient perception and quality
Identifieur interne : 002809 ( Istex/Curation ); précédent : 002808; suivant : 002810A randomised trial of a simplified method for complete denture fabrication: patient perception and quality
Auteurs : R. R. Regis [Brésil] ; T. R. Cunha [Brésil] ; M. P. Della Vecchia [Brésil] ; A. B. Ribeiro [Brésil] ; C. H. Silva-Lovato [Brésil] ; R. F. De Souza [Brésil]Source :
- Journal of Oral Rehabilitation [ 0305-182X ] ; 2013-07.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- American college, Brazilian version, Clinical procedures, Complete denture, Complete denture fabrication, Complete denture patients, Complete dentures, Complete edentulism, Complex techniques, Conventional denture fabrication methods, Conventional dentures, Conventional method, Conventional methods, Critical review, Della vecchia, Demographic characteristics, Dent, Dental materials, Denture, Denture fabrication, Denture fabrication methods, Denture quality, Denture satisfaction, Edentulism, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Edentulous subjects, Elderly people, Evidence base, Favours group, Functional assessment, Future studies, General satisfaction, Good results, Higher scores, Implant, Impression materials, Interocclusal distance, John wiley sons, Laboratory procedures, Lower denture, Lower denture retention, Lower dentures, Lower stability, Masticatory performance, Methods result, Null hypothesis, Occlusion articulation, Ohrqol, Oral health, Oral health impact, Oral healthrelated quality, Oral quality, Oral rehabil, Oral rehabilitation, Other studies, Other words, Participant, Patient satisfaction, Patient satisfaction instrument, Possible differences, Professional activity, Prosthet, Prosthet dent, Prosthetic dentistry, Prosthodont, Prosthodontic treatment, Prosthodontics, Quality assessment, Randomised, Randomised trial, Randomised trial table, Relative risks, Retrospective study, Scenario analysis, Several participants, Similar results, Single appointment, Such differences, Such method, Summary score, Summary scores, Upper denture, Upper retention, Upper stability, Young dentists, Zinc paste.
- Teeft :
- American college, Brazilian version, Clinical procedures, Complete denture, Complete denture fabrication, Complete denture patients, Complete dentures, Complete edentulism, Complex techniques, Conventional denture fabrication methods, Conventional dentures, Conventional method, Conventional methods, Critical review, Della vecchia, Demographic characteristics, Dent, Dental materials, Denture, Denture fabrication, Denture fabrication methods, Denture quality, Denture satisfaction, Edentulism, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Edentulous subjects, Elderly people, Evidence base, Favours group, Functional assessment, Future studies, General satisfaction, Good results, Higher scores, Implant, Impression materials, Interocclusal distance, John wiley sons, Laboratory procedures, Lower denture, Lower denture retention, Lower dentures, Lower stability, Masticatory performance, Methods result, Null hypothesis, Occlusion articulation, Ohrqol, Oral health, Oral health impact, Oral healthrelated quality, Oral quality, Oral rehabil, Oral rehabilitation, Other studies, Other words, Participant, Patient satisfaction, Patient satisfaction instrument, Possible differences, Professional activity, Prosthet, Prosthet dent, Prosthetic dentistry, Prosthodont, Prosthodontic treatment, Prosthodontics, Quality assessment, Randomised, Randomised trial, Randomised trial table, Relative risks, Retrospective study, Scenario analysis, Several participants, Similar results, Single appointment, Such differences, Such method, Summary score, Summary scores, Upper denture, Upper retention, Upper stability, Young dentists, Zinc paste.
Abstract
Complete denture fabrication involves a series of complex technical procedures. Nevertheless, simplified methods may be as effective as conventional ones albeit the lesser use of time and resources, without disadvantage for the patient. This study compared a simplified method for complete denture fabrication to a conventional protocol in terms of oral health‐related quality of life (OHRQoL), patient satisfaction and denture quality. Forty‐two edentulous patients requesting treatment with complete dentures were randomly allocated into two study groups. Group S received dentures fabricated by a simplified method and Group C received conventionally fabricated dentures. Before interventions and after three and 6 months following insertion, OHRQoL and patient satisfaction were analysed by specific instruments. A prosthodontist assessed denture quality 3 months after delivery. Groups presented no difference for OHRQoL, denture quality and general satisfaction. Differences regarding patient satisfaction with some aspects of the dentures were found after 3 months (S > C), but were insignificant at 6 months. It was concluded that the simplified method is able to produce dentures of a quality comparable to those produced by the conventional method, influencing OHRQoL and patient satisfaction similarly.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/joor.12063
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :002809
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:517475B75FA0DE692E8C302C8784F7DC2110C461Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A randomised trial of a simplified method for complete denture fabrication: patient perception and quality</title><author><name sortKey="Regis, R R" sort="Regis, R R" uniqKey="Regis R" first="R. R." last="Regis">R. R. Regis</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Brésil</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Cunha, T R" sort="Cunha, T R" uniqKey="Cunha T" first="T. R." last="Cunha">T. R. Cunha</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Brésil</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Della Vecchia, M P" sort="Della Vecchia, M P" uniqKey="Della Vecchia M" first="M. P." last="Della Vecchia">M. P. Della Vecchia</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Brésil</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ribeiro, A B" sort="Ribeiro, A B" uniqKey="Ribeiro A" first="A. B." last="Ribeiro">A. B. Ribeiro</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Brésil</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Silva Ovato, C H" sort="Silva Ovato, C H" uniqKey="Silva Ovato C" first="C. H." last="Silva-Lovato">C. H. Silva-Lovato</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Brésil</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Souza, R F" sort="De Souza, R F" uniqKey="De Souza R" first="R. F." last="De Souza">R. F. De Souza</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Brésil</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto</wicri:regionArea></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence: Raphael F. de Souza, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, Av. do Café s/n, 14040‐904 Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.E‐mail:</mods:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">Brazil.E‐mail:</wicri:noCountry></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>E-mail: raphaelfs@yahoo.com.br</mods:affiliation><country wicri:rule="url">Brésil</country></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:517475B75FA0DE692E8C302C8784F7DC2110C461</idno><date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/joor.12063</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/517475B75FA0DE692E8C302C8784F7DC2110C461/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002809</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002809</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">002809</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A randomised trial of a simplified method for complete denture fabrication: patient perception and quality</title><author><name sortKey="Regis, R R" sort="Regis, R R" uniqKey="Regis R" first="R. R." last="Regis">R. R. Regis</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Brésil</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Cunha, T R" sort="Cunha, T R" uniqKey="Cunha T" first="T. R." last="Cunha">T. R. Cunha</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Brésil</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Della Vecchia, M P" sort="Della Vecchia, M P" uniqKey="Della Vecchia M" first="M. P." last="Della Vecchia">M. P. Della Vecchia</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Brésil</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ribeiro, A B" sort="Ribeiro, A B" uniqKey="Ribeiro A" first="A. B." last="Ribeiro">A. B. Ribeiro</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Brésil</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Silva Ovato, C H" sort="Silva Ovato, C H" uniqKey="Silva Ovato C" first="C. H." last="Silva-Lovato">C. H. Silva-Lovato</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Brésil</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Souza, R F" sort="De Souza, R F" uniqKey="De Souza R" first="R. F." last="De Souza">R. F. De Souza</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Brésil</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto</wicri:regionArea></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence: Raphael F. de Souza, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, Av. do Café s/n, 14040‐904 Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.E‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>E-mail: raphaelfs@yahoo.com.br</mods:affiliation><country wicri:rule="url">Brésil</country></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION</title><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">40</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">7</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="535">535</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="545">545</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">11</biblScope><date type="published" when="2013-07">2013-07</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>American college</term><term>Brazilian version</term><term>Clinical procedures</term><term>Complete denture</term><term>Complete denture fabrication</term><term>Complete denture patients</term><term>Complete dentures</term><term>Complete edentulism</term><term>Complex techniques</term><term>Conventional denture fabrication methods</term><term>Conventional dentures</term><term>Conventional method</term><term>Conventional methods</term><term>Critical review</term><term>Della vecchia</term><term>Demographic characteristics</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental materials</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture fabrication</term><term>Denture fabrication methods</term><term>Denture quality</term><term>Denture satisfaction</term><term>Edentulism</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Edentulous subjects</term><term>Elderly people</term><term>Evidence base</term><term>Favours group</term><term>Functional assessment</term><term>Future studies</term><term>General satisfaction</term><term>Good results</term><term>Higher scores</term><term>Implant</term><term>Impression materials</term><term>Interocclusal distance</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Laboratory procedures</term><term>Lower denture</term><term>Lower denture retention</term><term>Lower dentures</term><term>Lower stability</term><term>Masticatory performance</term><term>Methods result</term><term>Null hypothesis</term><term>Occlusion articulation</term><term>Ohrqol</term><term>Oral health</term><term>Oral health impact</term><term>Oral healthrelated quality</term><term>Oral quality</term><term>Oral rehabil</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Other studies</term><term>Other words</term><term>Participant</term><term>Patient satisfaction</term><term>Patient satisfaction instrument</term><term>Possible differences</term><term>Professional activity</term><term>Prosthet</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Prosthodont</term><term>Prosthodontic treatment</term><term>Prosthodontics</term><term>Quality assessment</term><term>Randomised</term><term>Randomised trial</term><term>Randomised trial table</term><term>Relative risks</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Scenario analysis</term><term>Several participants</term><term>Similar results</term><term>Single appointment</term><term>Such differences</term><term>Such method</term><term>Summary score</term><term>Summary scores</term><term>Upper denture</term><term>Upper retention</term><term>Upper stability</term><term>Young dentists</term><term>Zinc paste</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>American college</term><term>Brazilian version</term><term>Clinical procedures</term><term>Complete denture</term><term>Complete denture fabrication</term><term>Complete denture patients</term><term>Complete dentures</term><term>Complete edentulism</term><term>Complex techniques</term><term>Conventional denture fabrication methods</term><term>Conventional dentures</term><term>Conventional method</term><term>Conventional methods</term><term>Critical review</term><term>Della vecchia</term><term>Demographic characteristics</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental materials</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture fabrication</term><term>Denture fabrication methods</term><term>Denture quality</term><term>Denture satisfaction</term><term>Edentulism</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Edentulous subjects</term><term>Elderly people</term><term>Evidence base</term><term>Favours group</term><term>Functional assessment</term><term>Future studies</term><term>General satisfaction</term><term>Good results</term><term>Higher scores</term><term>Implant</term><term>Impression materials</term><term>Interocclusal distance</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Laboratory procedures</term><term>Lower denture</term><term>Lower denture retention</term><term>Lower dentures</term><term>Lower stability</term><term>Masticatory performance</term><term>Methods result</term><term>Null hypothesis</term><term>Occlusion articulation</term><term>Ohrqol</term><term>Oral health</term><term>Oral health impact</term><term>Oral healthrelated quality</term><term>Oral quality</term><term>Oral rehabil</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Other studies</term><term>Other words</term><term>Participant</term><term>Patient satisfaction</term><term>Patient satisfaction instrument</term><term>Possible differences</term><term>Professional activity</term><term>Prosthet</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Prosthodont</term><term>Prosthodontic treatment</term><term>Prosthodontics</term><term>Quality assessment</term><term>Randomised</term><term>Randomised trial</term><term>Randomised trial table</term><term>Relative risks</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Scenario analysis</term><term>Several participants</term><term>Similar results</term><term>Single appointment</term><term>Such differences</term><term>Such method</term><term>Summary score</term><term>Summary scores</term><term>Upper denture</term><term>Upper retention</term><term>Upper stability</term><term>Young dentists</term><term>Zinc paste</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Complete denture fabrication involves a series of complex technical procedures. Nevertheless, simplified methods may be as effective as conventional ones albeit the lesser use of time and resources, without disadvantage for the patient. This study compared a simplified method for complete denture fabrication to a conventional protocol in terms of oral health‐related quality of life (OHRQoL), patient satisfaction and denture quality. Forty‐two edentulous patients requesting treatment with complete dentures were randomly allocated into two study groups. Group S received dentures fabricated by a simplified method and Group C received conventionally fabricated dentures. Before interventions and after three and 6 months following insertion, OHRQoL and patient satisfaction were analysed by specific instruments. A prosthodontist assessed denture quality 3 months after delivery. Groups presented no difference for OHRQoL, denture quality and general satisfaction. Differences regarding patient satisfaction with some aspects of the dentures were found after 3 months (S > C), but were insignificant at 6 months. It was concluded that the simplified method is able to produce dentures of a quality comparable to those produced by the conventional method, influencing OHRQoL and patient satisfaction similarly.</div></front></TEI></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002809 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 002809 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:517475B75FA0DE692E8C302C8784F7DC2110C461
|texte= A randomised trial of a simplified method for complete denture fabrication: patient perception and quality
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |