A randomised trial of a simplified method for complete denture fabrication: patient perception and quality
Identifieur interne : 002809 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 002808; suivant : 002810A randomised trial of a simplified method for complete denture fabrication: patient perception and quality
Auteurs : R. R. Regis ; T. R. Cunha ; M. P. Della Vecchia ; A. B. Ribeiro ; C. H. Silva-Lovato ; R. F. De SouzaSource :
- Journal of Oral Rehabilitation [ 0305-182X ] ; 2013-07.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- American college, Brazilian version, Clinical procedures, Complete denture, Complete denture fabrication, Complete denture patients, Complete dentures, Complete edentulism, Complex techniques, Conventional denture fabrication methods, Conventional dentures, Conventional method, Conventional methods, Critical review, Della vecchia, Demographic characteristics, Dent, Dental materials, Denture, Denture fabrication, Denture fabrication methods, Denture quality, Denture satisfaction, Edentulism, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Edentulous subjects, Elderly people, Evidence base, Favours group, Functional assessment, Future studies, General satisfaction, Good results, Higher scores, Implant, Impression materials, Interocclusal distance, John wiley sons, Laboratory procedures, Lower denture, Lower denture retention, Lower dentures, Lower stability, Masticatory performance, Methods result, Null hypothesis, Occlusion articulation, Ohrqol, Oral health, Oral health impact, Oral healthrelated quality, Oral quality, Oral rehabil, Oral rehabilitation, Other studies, Other words, Participant, Patient satisfaction, Patient satisfaction instrument, Possible differences, Professional activity, Prosthet, Prosthet dent, Prosthetic dentistry, Prosthodont, Prosthodontic treatment, Prosthodontics, Quality assessment, Randomised, Randomised trial, Randomised trial table, Relative risks, Retrospective study, Scenario analysis, Several participants, Similar results, Single appointment, Such differences, Such method, Summary score, Summary scores, Upper denture, Upper retention, Upper stability, Young dentists, Zinc paste.
- Teeft :
- American college, Brazilian version, Clinical procedures, Complete denture, Complete denture fabrication, Complete denture patients, Complete dentures, Complete edentulism, Complex techniques, Conventional denture fabrication methods, Conventional dentures, Conventional method, Conventional methods, Critical review, Della vecchia, Demographic characteristics, Dent, Dental materials, Denture, Denture fabrication, Denture fabrication methods, Denture quality, Denture satisfaction, Edentulism, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Edentulous subjects, Elderly people, Evidence base, Favours group, Functional assessment, Future studies, General satisfaction, Good results, Higher scores, Implant, Impression materials, Interocclusal distance, John wiley sons, Laboratory procedures, Lower denture, Lower denture retention, Lower dentures, Lower stability, Masticatory performance, Methods result, Null hypothesis, Occlusion articulation, Ohrqol, Oral health, Oral health impact, Oral healthrelated quality, Oral quality, Oral rehabil, Oral rehabilitation, Other studies, Other words, Participant, Patient satisfaction, Patient satisfaction instrument, Possible differences, Professional activity, Prosthet, Prosthet dent, Prosthetic dentistry, Prosthodont, Prosthodontic treatment, Prosthodontics, Quality assessment, Randomised, Randomised trial, Randomised trial table, Relative risks, Retrospective study, Scenario analysis, Several participants, Similar results, Single appointment, Such differences, Such method, Summary score, Summary scores, Upper denture, Upper retention, Upper stability, Young dentists, Zinc paste.
Abstract
Complete denture fabrication involves a series of complex technical procedures. Nevertheless, simplified methods may be as effective as conventional ones albeit the lesser use of time and resources, without disadvantage for the patient. This study compared a simplified method for complete denture fabrication to a conventional protocol in terms of oral health‐related quality of life (OHRQoL), patient satisfaction and denture quality. Forty‐two edentulous patients requesting treatment with complete dentures were randomly allocated into two study groups. Group S received dentures fabricated by a simplified method and Group C received conventionally fabricated dentures. Before interventions and after three and 6 months following insertion, OHRQoL and patient satisfaction were analysed by specific instruments. A prosthodontist assessed denture quality 3 months after delivery. Groups presented no difference for OHRQoL, denture quality and general satisfaction. Differences regarding patient satisfaction with some aspects of the dentures were found after 3 months (S > C), but were insignificant at 6 months. It was concluded that the simplified method is able to produce dentures of a quality comparable to those produced by the conventional method, influencing OHRQoL and patient satisfaction similarly.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/joor.12063
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:517475B75FA0DE692E8C302C8784F7DC2110C461Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A randomised trial of a simplified method for complete denture fabrication: patient perception and quality</title><author><name sortKey="Regis, R R" sort="Regis, R R" uniqKey="Regis R" first="R. R." last="Regis">R. R. Regis</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Cunha, T R" sort="Cunha, T R" uniqKey="Cunha T" first="T. R." last="Cunha">T. R. Cunha</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Della Vecchia, M P" sort="Della Vecchia, M P" uniqKey="Della Vecchia M" first="M. P." last="Della Vecchia">M. P. Della Vecchia</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ribeiro, A B" sort="Ribeiro, A B" uniqKey="Ribeiro A" first="A. B." last="Ribeiro">A. B. Ribeiro</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Silva Ovato, C H" sort="Silva Ovato, C H" uniqKey="Silva Ovato C" first="C. H." last="Silva-Lovato">C. H. Silva-Lovato</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Souza, R F" sort="De Souza, R F" uniqKey="De Souza R" first="R. F." last="De Souza">R. F. De Souza</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence: Raphael F. de Souza, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, Av. do Café s/n, 14040‐904 Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.E‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: raphaelfs@yahoo.com.br</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:517475B75FA0DE692E8C302C8784F7DC2110C461</idno><date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/joor.12063</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/517475B75FA0DE692E8C302C8784F7DC2110C461/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002809</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002809</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A randomised trial of a simplified method for complete denture fabrication: patient perception and quality</title><author><name sortKey="Regis, R R" sort="Regis, R R" uniqKey="Regis R" first="R. R." last="Regis">R. R. Regis</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Cunha, T R" sort="Cunha, T R" uniqKey="Cunha T" first="T. R." last="Cunha">T. R. Cunha</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Della Vecchia, M P" sort="Della Vecchia, M P" uniqKey="Della Vecchia M" first="M. P." last="Della Vecchia">M. P. Della Vecchia</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ribeiro, A B" sort="Ribeiro, A B" uniqKey="Ribeiro A" first="A. B." last="Ribeiro">A. B. Ribeiro</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Silva Ovato, C H" sort="Silva Ovato, C H" uniqKey="Silva Ovato C" first="C. H." last="Silva-Lovato">C. H. Silva-Lovato</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Souza, R F" sort="De Souza, R F" uniqKey="De Souza R" first="R. F." last="De Souza">R. F. De Souza</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence: Raphael F. de Souza, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, Av. do Café s/n, 14040‐904 Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.E‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: raphaelfs@yahoo.com.br</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION</title><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">40</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">7</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="535">535</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="545">545</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">11</biblScope><date type="published" when="2013-07">2013-07</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>American college</term><term>Brazilian version</term><term>Clinical procedures</term><term>Complete denture</term><term>Complete denture fabrication</term><term>Complete denture patients</term><term>Complete dentures</term><term>Complete edentulism</term><term>Complex techniques</term><term>Conventional denture fabrication methods</term><term>Conventional dentures</term><term>Conventional method</term><term>Conventional methods</term><term>Critical review</term><term>Della vecchia</term><term>Demographic characteristics</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental materials</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture fabrication</term><term>Denture fabrication methods</term><term>Denture quality</term><term>Denture satisfaction</term><term>Edentulism</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Edentulous subjects</term><term>Elderly people</term><term>Evidence base</term><term>Favours group</term><term>Functional assessment</term><term>Future studies</term><term>General satisfaction</term><term>Good results</term><term>Higher scores</term><term>Implant</term><term>Impression materials</term><term>Interocclusal distance</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Laboratory procedures</term><term>Lower denture</term><term>Lower denture retention</term><term>Lower dentures</term><term>Lower stability</term><term>Masticatory performance</term><term>Methods result</term><term>Null hypothesis</term><term>Occlusion articulation</term><term>Ohrqol</term><term>Oral health</term><term>Oral health impact</term><term>Oral healthrelated quality</term><term>Oral quality</term><term>Oral rehabil</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Other studies</term><term>Other words</term><term>Participant</term><term>Patient satisfaction</term><term>Patient satisfaction instrument</term><term>Possible differences</term><term>Professional activity</term><term>Prosthet</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Prosthodont</term><term>Prosthodontic treatment</term><term>Prosthodontics</term><term>Quality assessment</term><term>Randomised</term><term>Randomised trial</term><term>Randomised trial table</term><term>Relative risks</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Scenario analysis</term><term>Several participants</term><term>Similar results</term><term>Single appointment</term><term>Such differences</term><term>Such method</term><term>Summary score</term><term>Summary scores</term><term>Upper denture</term><term>Upper retention</term><term>Upper stability</term><term>Young dentists</term><term>Zinc paste</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>American college</term><term>Brazilian version</term><term>Clinical procedures</term><term>Complete denture</term><term>Complete denture fabrication</term><term>Complete denture patients</term><term>Complete dentures</term><term>Complete edentulism</term><term>Complex techniques</term><term>Conventional denture fabrication methods</term><term>Conventional dentures</term><term>Conventional method</term><term>Conventional methods</term><term>Critical review</term><term>Della vecchia</term><term>Demographic characteristics</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental materials</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture fabrication</term><term>Denture fabrication methods</term><term>Denture quality</term><term>Denture satisfaction</term><term>Edentulism</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Edentulous subjects</term><term>Elderly people</term><term>Evidence base</term><term>Favours group</term><term>Functional assessment</term><term>Future studies</term><term>General satisfaction</term><term>Good results</term><term>Higher scores</term><term>Implant</term><term>Impression materials</term><term>Interocclusal distance</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Laboratory procedures</term><term>Lower denture</term><term>Lower denture retention</term><term>Lower dentures</term><term>Lower stability</term><term>Masticatory performance</term><term>Methods result</term><term>Null hypothesis</term><term>Occlusion articulation</term><term>Ohrqol</term><term>Oral health</term><term>Oral health impact</term><term>Oral healthrelated quality</term><term>Oral quality</term><term>Oral rehabil</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Other studies</term><term>Other words</term><term>Participant</term><term>Patient satisfaction</term><term>Patient satisfaction instrument</term><term>Possible differences</term><term>Professional activity</term><term>Prosthet</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Prosthodont</term><term>Prosthodontic treatment</term><term>Prosthodontics</term><term>Quality assessment</term><term>Randomised</term><term>Randomised trial</term><term>Randomised trial table</term><term>Relative risks</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Scenario analysis</term><term>Several participants</term><term>Similar results</term><term>Single appointment</term><term>Such differences</term><term>Such method</term><term>Summary score</term><term>Summary scores</term><term>Upper denture</term><term>Upper retention</term><term>Upper stability</term><term>Young dentists</term><term>Zinc paste</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Complete denture fabrication involves a series of complex technical procedures. Nevertheless, simplified methods may be as effective as conventional ones albeit the lesser use of time and resources, without disadvantage for the patient. This study compared a simplified method for complete denture fabrication to a conventional protocol in terms of oral health‐related quality of life (OHRQoL), patient satisfaction and denture quality. Forty‐two edentulous patients requesting treatment with complete dentures were randomly allocated into two study groups. Group S received dentures fabricated by a simplified method and Group C received conventionally fabricated dentures. Before interventions and after three and 6 months following insertion, OHRQoL and patient satisfaction were analysed by specific instruments. A prosthodontist assessed denture quality 3 months after delivery. Groups presented no difference for OHRQoL, denture quality and general satisfaction. Differences regarding patient satisfaction with some aspects of the dentures were found after 3 months (S > C), but were insignificant at 6 months. It was concluded that the simplified method is able to produce dentures of a quality comparable to those produced by the conventional method, influencing OHRQoL and patient satisfaction similarly.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>complete dentures</json:string><json:string>ohrqol</json:string><json:string>patient satisfaction</json:string><json:string>prosthodont</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons</json:string><json:string>randomised</json:string><json:string>denture quality</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>complete denture fabrication</json:string><json:string>edentulism</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string><json:string>prosthet</json:string><json:string>prosthodontics</json:string><json:string>prosthet dent</json:string><json:string>conventional method</json:string><json:string>randomised trial</json:string><json:string>summary score</json:string><json:string>edentulous subjects</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string><json:string>denture fabrication methods</json:string><json:string>prosthodontic treatment</json:string><json:string>oral rehabil</json:string><json:string>similar results</json:string><json:string>participant</json:string><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>other words</json:string><json:string>lower stability</json:string><json:string>functional assessment</json:string><json:string>denture fabrication</json:string><json:string>oral quality</json:string><json:string>della vecchia</json:string><json:string>critical review</json:string><json:string>summary scores</json:string><json:string>single appointment</json:string><json:string>clinical procedures</json:string><json:string>oral healthrelated quality</json:string><json:string>quality assessment</json:string><json:string>brazilian version</json:string><json:string>dental materials</json:string><json:string>higher scores</json:string><json:string>laboratory procedures</json:string><json:string>interocclusal distance</json:string><json:string>complex techniques</json:string><json:string>demographic characteristics</json:string><json:string>denture satisfaction</json:string><json:string>lower denture retention</json:string><json:string>such differences</json:string><json:string>conventional denture fabrication methods</json:string><json:string>methods result</json:string><json:string>relative risks</json:string><json:string>scenario analysis</json:string><json:string>such method</json:string><json:string>upper denture</json:string><json:string>randomised trial table</json:string><json:string>patient satisfaction instrument</json:string><json:string>oral health</json:string><json:string>general satisfaction</json:string><json:string>several participants</json:string><json:string>conventional methods</json:string><json:string>lower dentures</json:string><json:string>other studies</json:string><json:string>lower denture</json:string><json:string>impression materials</json:string><json:string>zinc paste</json:string><json:string>future studies</json:string><json:string>occlusion articulation</json:string><json:string>upper retention</json:string><json:string>upper stability</json:string><json:string>possible differences</json:string><json:string>favours group</json:string><json:string>young dentists</json:string><json:string>good results</json:string><json:string>retrospective study</json:string><json:string>null hypothesis</json:string><json:string>oral rehabilitation</json:string><json:string>complete denture</json:string><json:string>professional activity</json:string><json:string>complete edentulism</json:string><json:string>american college</json:string><json:string>masticatory performance</json:string><json:string>conventional dentures</json:string><json:string>evidence base</json:string><json:string>prosthetic dentistry</json:string><json:string>elderly people</json:string><json:string>complete denture patients</json:string><json:string>oral health impact</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>R. R. Regis</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>T. R. Cunha</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>M. P. Della Vecchia</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>A. B. Ribeiro</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>C. H. Silva‐Lovato</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>R. F. de Souza</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil</json:string><json:string>Correspondence: Raphael F. de Souza, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, Av. do Café s/n, 14040‐904 Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.E‐mail:</json:string><json:string>E-mail: raphaelfs@yahoo.com.br</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental impression technique</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dentures</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>mastication</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>questionnaires</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>randomised controlled trial</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>treatment outcome</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>JOOR12063</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-H21SWBPL-4</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Complete denture fabrication involves a series of complex technical procedures. Nevertheless, simplified methods may be as effective as conventional ones albeit the lesser use of time and resources, without disadvantage for the patient. This study compared a simplified method for complete denture fabrication to a conventional protocol in terms of oral health‐related quality of life (OHRQoL), patient satisfaction and denture quality. Forty‐two edentulous patients requesting treatment with complete dentures were randomly allocated into two study groups. Group S received dentures fabricated by a simplified method and Group C received conventionally fabricated dentures. Before interventions and after three and 6 months following insertion, OHRQoL and patient satisfaction were analysed by specific instruments. A prosthodontist assessed denture quality 3 months after delivery. Groups presented no difference for OHRQoL, denture quality and general satisfaction. Differences regarding patient satisfaction with some aspects of the dentures were found after 3 months (S > C), but were insignificant at 6 months. It was concluded that the simplified method is able to produce dentures of a quality comparable to those produced by the conventional method, influencing OHRQoL and patient satisfaction similarly.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.852</score><pdfWordCount>4716</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>32536</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.7</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>11</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>178</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1313</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>6</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>A randomised trial of a simplified method for complete denture fabrication: patient perception and quality</title><pmid><json:string>23663152</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0305-182X</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1365-2842</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JOOR</json:string></publisherId><volume>40</volume><issue>7</issue><pages><first>535</first><last>545</last><total>11</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Original Article</value></json:item></subject></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2013-04-25</json:string><json:string>2013</json:string><json:string>from October 2010 to April 2011</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Nuñez MCO</json:string><json:string>SPSS Inc., Chicago</json:string><json:string>ACP</json:string><json:string>Sons Ltd</json:string><json:string>American College of Prosthodontists</json:string><json:string>The British Society for the Study of Prosthetic Dentistry</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>V. Ability</json:string><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>Viviane C. Oliveira</json:string></persName><placeName></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Kawai et al.</json:string><json:string>Cunha et al.</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-H21SWBPL-4</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2013</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2013</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/joor.12063</json:string></doi><id>517475B75FA0DE692E8C302C8784F7DC2110C461</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/517475B75FA0DE692E8C302C8784F7DC2110C461/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/517475B75FA0DE692E8C302C8784F7DC2110C461/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/517475B75FA0DE692E8C302C8784F7DC2110C461/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">A randomised trial of a simplified method for complete denture fabrication: patient perception and quality</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Wiley Publishing Ltd</publisher><availability><licence>© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2013-07"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A randomised trial of a simplified method for complete denture fabrication: patient perception and quality</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">R. R.</forename><surname>Regis</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics</orgName><orgName>Ribeirão Preto Dental School</orgName><orgName>University of São Paulo</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Ribeirão Preto</settlement><region>SP</region><country key="BR">Brazil</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">T. R.</forename><surname>Cunha</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics</orgName><orgName>Ribeirão Preto Dental School</orgName><orgName>University of São Paulo</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Ribeirão Preto</settlement><region>SP</region><country key="BR">Brazil</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">M. P.</forename><surname>Della Vecchia</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics</orgName><orgName>Ribeirão Preto Dental School</orgName><orgName>University of São Paulo</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Ribeirão Preto</settlement><region>SP</region><country key="BR">Brazil</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">A. B.</forename><surname>Ribeiro</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics</orgName><orgName>Ribeirão Preto Dental School</orgName><orgName>University of São Paulo</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Ribeirão Preto</settlement><region>SP</region><country key="BR">Brazil</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">C. H.</forename><surname>Silva‐Lovato</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics</orgName><orgName>Ribeirão Preto Dental School</orgName><orgName>University of São Paulo</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Ribeirão Preto</settlement><region>SP</region><country key="BR">Brazil</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0005" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">R. F.</forename><surname>de Souza</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics</orgName><orgName>Ribeirão Preto Dental School</orgName><orgName>University of São Paulo</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Ribeirão Preto</settlement><region>SP</region><country key="BR">Brazil</country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Correspondence: Raphael F. de Souza, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, Av. do Café s/n, 14040‐904 Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil. E‐mail: raphaelfs@yahoo.com.br</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">517475B75FA0DE692E8C302C8784F7DC2110C461</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-H21SWBPL-4</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/joor.12063</idno><idno type="unit">JOOR12063</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JOOR.JOOR12063.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION</title><idno type="pISSN">0305-182X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/joor.2013.40.issue-7</idno><idno type="product">JOOR</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">40</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">7</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="535">535</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="545">545</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">11</biblScope><date type="published" when="2013-07"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract style="main" xml:id="joor12063-abs-0001"><head>Summary</head><p>Complete denture fabrication involves a series of complex technical procedures. Nevertheless, simplified methods may be as effective as conventional ones albeit the lesser use of time and resources, without disadvantage for the patient. This study compared a simplified method for complete denture fabrication to a conventional protocol in terms of oral health‐related quality of life (<hi rend="fc">OHRQ</hi>oL), patient satisfaction and denture quality. Forty‐two edentulous patients requesting treatment with complete dentures were randomly allocated into two study groups. Group S received dentures fabricated by a simplified method and Group C received conventionally fabricated dentures. Before interventions and after three and 6 months following insertion, <hi rend="fc">OHRQ</hi>oL and patient satisfaction were analysed by specific instruments. A prosthodontist assessed denture quality 3 months after delivery. Groups presented no difference for <hi rend="fc">OHRQ</hi>oL, denture quality and general satisfaction. Differences regarding patient satisfaction with some aspects of the dentures were found after 3 months (S > C), but were insignificant at 6 months. It was concluded that the simplified method is able to produce dentures of a quality comparable to those produced by the conventional method, influencing <hi rend="fc">OHRQ</hi>oL and patient satisfaction similarly.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords><term xml:id="joor12063-kwd-0001">dental impression technique</term><term xml:id="joor12063-kwd-0002">dentures</term><term xml:id="joor12063-kwd-0003">mastication</term><term xml:id="joor12063-kwd-0004">questionnaires</term><term xml:id="joor12063-kwd-0005">randomised controlled trial</term><term xml:id="joor12063-kwd-0006">treatment outcome</term></keywords><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>Original Article</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/517475B75FA0DE692E8C302C8784F7DC2110C461/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component type="serialArticle" version="2.0" xml:id="joor12063" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</doi><issn type="print">0305-182X</issn><issn type="electronic">1365-2842</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JOOR"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title sort="JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title type="short">J Oral Rehabil</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="07107"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/joor.2013.40.issue-7</doi><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="40">40</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">7</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2013-07">July 2013</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" position="80" status="forIssue" type="article"><doi>10.1111/joor.12063</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JOOR12063"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count number="11" type="pageTotal"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Original Article</title><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</copyright><eventGroup><event date="2013-04-18" type="manuscriptAccepted"></event><event agent="SPS" date="2013-04-25" type="xmlCreated"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2013-05-12"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2013-05-12"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2013-06-10"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-20"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.6.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-10-03"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">535</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">545</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><lineatedText><line>Correspondence: Raphael F. de Souza, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, Av. do Café s/n, 14040‐904 Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.</line><line>E‐mail: <email>raphaelfs@yahoo.com.br</email></line></lineatedText></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JOOR.JOOR12063.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><titleGroup><title type="main">A randomised trial of a simplified method for complete denture fabrication: patient perception and quality</title><title type="shortAuthors">R. R. Regis <i>et al</i>.</title></titleGroup><creators><creator affiliationRef="#joor12063-aff-0001" creatorRole="author" xml:id="joor12063-cr-0001"><personName><givenNames>R. R.</givenNames> <familyName>Regis</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#joor12063-aff-0001" creatorRole="author" xml:id="joor12063-cr-0002"><personName><givenNames>T. R.</givenNames> <familyName>Cunha</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#joor12063-aff-0001" creatorRole="author" xml:id="joor12063-cr-0003"><personName><givenNames>M. P.</givenNames> <familyName>Della Vecchia</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#joor12063-aff-0001" creatorRole="author" xml:id="joor12063-cr-0004"><personName><givenNames>A. B.</givenNames> <familyName>Ribeiro</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#joor12063-aff-0001" creatorRole="author" xml:id="joor12063-cr-0005"><personName><givenNames>C. H.</givenNames> <familyName>Silva‐Lovato</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#joor12063-aff-0001" corresponding="yes" creatorRole="author" xml:id="joor12063-cr-0006"><personName><givenNames>R. F.</givenNames> <familyName>de Souza</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation countryCode="BR" type="organization" xml:id="joor12063-aff-0001"><orgDiv>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics</orgDiv> <orgDiv>Ribeirão Preto Dental School</orgDiv> <orgName>University of São Paulo</orgName> <address><city>Ribeirão Preto</city> <countryPart>SP</countryPart> <country>Brazil</country></address></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup type="author"><keyword xml:id="joor12063-kwd-0001">dental impression technique</keyword><keyword xml:id="joor12063-kwd-0002">dentures</keyword><keyword xml:id="joor12063-kwd-0003">mastication</keyword><keyword xml:id="joor12063-kwd-0004">questionnaires</keyword><keyword xml:id="joor12063-kwd-0005">randomised controlled trial</keyword><keyword xml:id="joor12063-kwd-0006">treatment outcome</keyword></keywordGroup><fundingInfo><fundingAgency>FAPESP</fundingAgency><fundingNumber>2010/09381‐9</fundingNumber></fundingInfo><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:id="joor12063-abs-0001"><title type="main">Summary</title><p>Complete denture fabrication involves a series of complex technical procedures. Nevertheless, simplified methods may be as effective as conventional ones albeit the lesser use of time and resources, without disadvantage for the patient. This study compared a simplified method for complete denture fabrication to a conventional protocol in terms of oral health‐related quality of life (<fc>OHRQ</fc>oL), patient satisfaction and denture quality. Forty‐two edentulous patients requesting treatment with complete dentures were randomly allocated into two study groups. Group S received dentures fabricated by a simplified method and Group C received conventionally fabricated dentures. Before interventions and after three and 6 months following insertion, <fc>OHRQ</fc>oL and patient satisfaction were analysed by specific instruments. A prosthodontist assessed denture quality 3 months after delivery. Groups presented no difference for <fc>OHRQ</fc>oL, denture quality and general satisfaction. Differences regarding patient satisfaction with some aspects of the dentures were found after 3 months (S > C), but were insignificant at 6 months. It was concluded that the simplified method is able to produce dentures of a quality comparable to those produced by the conventional method, influencing <fc>OHRQ</fc>oL and patient satisfaction similarly.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>A randomised trial of a simplified method for complete denture fabrication: patient perception and quality</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>A randomised trial of a simplified method for complete denture fabrication: patient perception and quality</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">R. R.</namePart><namePart type="family">Regis</namePart><affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">T. R.</namePart><namePart type="family">Cunha</namePart><affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">M. P.</namePart><namePart type="family">Della Vecchia</namePart><affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">A. B.</namePart><namePart type="family">Ribeiro</namePart><affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">C. H.</namePart><namePart type="family">Silva‐Lovato</namePart><affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">R. F.</namePart><namePart type="family">de Souza</namePart><affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil</affiliation><affiliation>Correspondence: Raphael F. de Souza, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, Av. do Café s/n, 14040‐904 Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.E‐mail:</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: raphaelfs@yahoo.com.br</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2013-07</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2013-04-25</dateCreated><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2013-04-18</dateValid><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2013</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><abstract>Complete denture fabrication involves a series of complex technical procedures. Nevertheless, simplified methods may be as effective as conventional ones albeit the lesser use of time and resources, without disadvantage for the patient. This study compared a simplified method for complete denture fabrication to a conventional protocol in terms of oral health‐related quality of life (OHRQoL), patient satisfaction and denture quality. Forty‐two edentulous patients requesting treatment with complete dentures were randomly allocated into two study groups. Group S received dentures fabricated by a simplified method and Group C received conventionally fabricated dentures. Before interventions and after three and 6 months following insertion, OHRQoL and patient satisfaction were analysed by specific instruments. A prosthodontist assessed denture quality 3 months after delivery. Groups presented no difference for OHRQoL, denture quality and general satisfaction. Differences regarding patient satisfaction with some aspects of the dentures were found after 3 months (S > C), but were insignificant at 6 months. It was concluded that the simplified method is able to produce dentures of a quality comparable to those produced by the conventional method, influencing OHRQoL and patient satisfaction similarly.</abstract><note type="funding">FAPESP - No. 2010/09381‐9; </note><subject><genre>keywords</genre><topic>dental impression technique</topic><topic>dentures</topic><topic>mastication</topic><topic>questionnaires</topic><topic>randomised controlled trial</topic><topic>treatment outcome</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>J Oral Rehabil</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Original Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0305-182X</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1365-2842</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JOOR</identifier><part><date>2013</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>40</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>7</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>535</start><end>545</end><total>11</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">517475B75FA0DE692E8C302C8784F7DC2110C461</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-H21SWBPL-4</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/joor.12063</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JOOR12063</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/517475B75FA0DE692E8C302C8784F7DC2110C461/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002809 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002809 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:517475B75FA0DE692E8C302C8784F7DC2110C461
|texte= A randomised trial of a simplified method for complete denture fabrication: patient perception and quality
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |