Denture Marking—Patient Preference of Various Methods
Identifieur interne : 000F42 ( Istex/Curation ); précédent : 000F41; suivant : 000F43Denture Marking—Patient Preference of Various Methods
Auteurs : Raymond Richmond [Royaume-Uni] ; Iain A. Pretty [Royaume-Uni]Source :
- Journal of Forensic Sciences [ 0022-1198 ] ; 2007-11.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Additional information, Complete dentures, Current study, Dent, Dental health unit, Denture, Denture identification, Edentulous patients, Fitting surface, Forensic dentistry, Forensic odontostomatol, Forensic sciences, Light cure resin, Mark dentures, Metal band, Onion skin, Oral rehabil, Photographic slide, Pmma strip, Predrilled hole, Preferred method, Rfid transponder chip, Skelton house, Tissue paper, Various methods.
- Teeft :
- Additional information, Complete dentures, Current study, Dent, Dental health unit, Denture, Denture identification, Edentulous patients, Fitting surface, Forensic dentistry, Forensic odontostomatol, Forensic sciences, Light cure resin, Mark dentures, Metal band, Onion skin, Oral rehabil, Photographic slide, Pmma strip, Predrilled hole, Preferred method, Rfid transponder chip, Skelton house, Tissue paper, Various methods.
Abstract
Abstract: Dental forensic organizations world wide have recommended that dental prostheses should be labeled with at least the patient's (wearer's) name and preferably with further unique identifiers such as social security number. A range of methods are available and the purpose of this study was to determine, via the means of a visual questionnaire, which are the most preferable to those patients who wear complete dentures. One hundred edentulous patients attending the Manchester Dental Hospital were shown a range of denture labeling methods and asked to rank these according to their preference. The most preferred method was that of an embedded radio frequency identification microchip (38% rated this as first) and the second was an inclusion technique using onion paper (24% rated this as first). The least preferred method was the use of a groove cut into the denture flange with 71% of patients rating this as the poorest in terms of esthetics. The study demonstrates that the method of denture labeling is important to patients and to ensure that denture labeling is performed routinely esthetic preferences must be considered.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00586.x
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000F42
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:1EE41587FB82CB18EC5827EBD6619E849AC347B8Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Denture Marking—Patient Preference of Various Methods</title><author><name sortKey="Richmond, Raymond" sort="Richmond, Raymond" uniqKey="Richmond R" first="Raymond" last="Richmond">Raymond Richmond</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Forensic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester M15 6FH, U.K.</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Forensic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester M15 6FH</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pretty, Iain A" sort="Pretty, Iain A" uniqKey="Pretty I" first="Iain A." last="Pretty">Iain A. Pretty</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Dental Health Unit, School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, 3A Skelton House, Manchester Science Park, Manchester M15 6SH, U.K.</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Dental Health Unit, School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, 3A Skelton House, Manchester Science Park, Manchester M15 6SH</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:1EE41587FB82CB18EC5827EBD6619E849AC347B8</idno><date when="2007" year="2007">2007</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00586.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/1EE41587FB82CB18EC5827EBD6619E849AC347B8/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000F42</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000F42</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000F42</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Denture Marking—Patient Preference of Various Methods</title><author><name sortKey="Richmond, Raymond" sort="Richmond, Raymond" uniqKey="Richmond R" first="Raymond" last="Richmond">Raymond Richmond</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Forensic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester M15 6FH, U.K.</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Forensic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester M15 6FH</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pretty, Iain A" sort="Pretty, Iain A" uniqKey="Pretty I" first="Iain A." last="Pretty">Iain A. Pretty</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Dental Health Unit, School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, 3A Skelton House, Manchester Science Park, Manchester M15 6SH, U.K.</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Dental Health Unit, School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, 3A Skelton House, Manchester Science Park, Manchester M15 6SH</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Forensic Sciences</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES</title><idno type="ISSN">0022-1198</idno><idno type="eISSN">1556-4029</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">52</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1338">1338</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1342">1342</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">5</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-11">2007-11</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0022-1198</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0022-1198</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Additional information</term><term>Complete dentures</term><term>Current study</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental health unit</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture identification</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Fitting surface</term><term>Forensic dentistry</term><term>Forensic odontostomatol</term><term>Forensic sciences</term><term>Light cure resin</term><term>Mark dentures</term><term>Metal band</term><term>Onion skin</term><term>Oral rehabil</term><term>Photographic slide</term><term>Pmma strip</term><term>Predrilled hole</term><term>Preferred method</term><term>Rfid transponder chip</term><term>Skelton house</term><term>Tissue paper</term><term>Various methods</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Additional information</term><term>Complete dentures</term><term>Current study</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental health unit</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture identification</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Fitting surface</term><term>Forensic dentistry</term><term>Forensic odontostomatol</term><term>Forensic sciences</term><term>Light cure resin</term><term>Mark dentures</term><term>Metal band</term><term>Onion skin</term><term>Oral rehabil</term><term>Photographic slide</term><term>Pmma strip</term><term>Predrilled hole</term><term>Preferred method</term><term>Rfid transponder chip</term><term>Skelton house</term><term>Tissue paper</term><term>Various methods</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Abstract: Dental forensic organizations world wide have recommended that dental prostheses should be labeled with at least the patient's (wearer's) name and preferably with further unique identifiers such as social security number. A range of methods are available and the purpose of this study was to determine, via the means of a visual questionnaire, which are the most preferable to those patients who wear complete dentures. One hundred edentulous patients attending the Manchester Dental Hospital were shown a range of denture labeling methods and asked to rank these according to their preference. The most preferred method was that of an embedded radio frequency identification microchip (38% rated this as first) and the second was an inclusion technique using onion paper (24% rated this as first). The least preferred method was the use of a groove cut into the denture flange with 71% of patients rating this as the poorest in terms of esthetics. The study demonstrates that the method of denture labeling is important to patients and to ensure that denture labeling is performed routinely esthetic preferences must be considered.</div></front></TEI></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000F42 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000F42 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:1EE41587FB82CB18EC5827EBD6619E849AC347B8
|texte= Denture Marking—Patient Preference of Various Methods
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |