Denture Marking—Patient Preference of Various Methods
Identifieur interne : 000F42 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000F41; suivant : 000F43Denture Marking—Patient Preference of Various Methods
Auteurs : Raymond Richmond ; Iain A. PrettySource :
- Journal of Forensic Sciences [ 0022-1198 ] ; 2007-11.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Additional information, Complete dentures, Current study, Dent, Dental health unit, Denture, Denture identification, Edentulous patients, Fitting surface, Forensic dentistry, Forensic odontostomatol, Forensic sciences, Light cure resin, Mark dentures, Metal band, Onion skin, Oral rehabil, Photographic slide, Pmma strip, Predrilled hole, Preferred method, Rfid transponder chip, Skelton house, Tissue paper, Various methods.
- Teeft :
- Additional information, Complete dentures, Current study, Dent, Dental health unit, Denture, Denture identification, Edentulous patients, Fitting surface, Forensic dentistry, Forensic odontostomatol, Forensic sciences, Light cure resin, Mark dentures, Metal band, Onion skin, Oral rehabil, Photographic slide, Pmma strip, Predrilled hole, Preferred method, Rfid transponder chip, Skelton house, Tissue paper, Various methods.
Abstract
Abstract: Dental forensic organizations world wide have recommended that dental prostheses should be labeled with at least the patient's (wearer's) name and preferably with further unique identifiers such as social security number. A range of methods are available and the purpose of this study was to determine, via the means of a visual questionnaire, which are the most preferable to those patients who wear complete dentures. One hundred edentulous patients attending the Manchester Dental Hospital were shown a range of denture labeling methods and asked to rank these according to their preference. The most preferred method was that of an embedded radio frequency identification microchip (38% rated this as first) and the second was an inclusion technique using onion paper (24% rated this as first). The least preferred method was the use of a groove cut into the denture flange with 71% of patients rating this as the poorest in terms of esthetics. The study demonstrates that the method of denture labeling is important to patients and to ensure that denture labeling is performed routinely esthetic preferences must be considered.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00586.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:1EE41587FB82CB18EC5827EBD6619E849AC347B8Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Denture Marking—Patient Preference of Various Methods</title><author><name sortKey="Richmond, Raymond" sort="Richmond, Raymond" uniqKey="Richmond R" first="Raymond" last="Richmond">Raymond Richmond</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Forensic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester M15 6FH, U.K.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pretty, Iain A" sort="Pretty, Iain A" uniqKey="Pretty I" first="Iain A." last="Pretty">Iain A. Pretty</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dental Health Unit, School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, 3A Skelton House, Manchester Science Park, Manchester M15 6SH, U.K.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:1EE41587FB82CB18EC5827EBD6619E849AC347B8</idno><date when="2007" year="2007">2007</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00586.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/1EE41587FB82CB18EC5827EBD6619E849AC347B8/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000F42</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000F42</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Denture Marking—Patient Preference of Various Methods</title><author><name sortKey="Richmond, Raymond" sort="Richmond, Raymond" uniqKey="Richmond R" first="Raymond" last="Richmond">Raymond Richmond</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Forensic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester M15 6FH, U.K.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pretty, Iain A" sort="Pretty, Iain A" uniqKey="Pretty I" first="Iain A." last="Pretty">Iain A. Pretty</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dental Health Unit, School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, 3A Skelton House, Manchester Science Park, Manchester M15 6SH, U.K.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Forensic Sciences</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES</title><idno type="ISSN">0022-1198</idno><idno type="eISSN">1556-4029</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">52</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1338">1338</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1342">1342</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">5</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-11">2007-11</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0022-1198</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0022-1198</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Additional information</term><term>Complete dentures</term><term>Current study</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental health unit</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture identification</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Fitting surface</term><term>Forensic dentistry</term><term>Forensic odontostomatol</term><term>Forensic sciences</term><term>Light cure resin</term><term>Mark dentures</term><term>Metal band</term><term>Onion skin</term><term>Oral rehabil</term><term>Photographic slide</term><term>Pmma strip</term><term>Predrilled hole</term><term>Preferred method</term><term>Rfid transponder chip</term><term>Skelton house</term><term>Tissue paper</term><term>Various methods</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Additional information</term><term>Complete dentures</term><term>Current study</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental health unit</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture identification</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Fitting surface</term><term>Forensic dentistry</term><term>Forensic odontostomatol</term><term>Forensic sciences</term><term>Light cure resin</term><term>Mark dentures</term><term>Metal band</term><term>Onion skin</term><term>Oral rehabil</term><term>Photographic slide</term><term>Pmma strip</term><term>Predrilled hole</term><term>Preferred method</term><term>Rfid transponder chip</term><term>Skelton house</term><term>Tissue paper</term><term>Various methods</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Abstract: Dental forensic organizations world wide have recommended that dental prostheses should be labeled with at least the patient's (wearer's) name and preferably with further unique identifiers such as social security number. A range of methods are available and the purpose of this study was to determine, via the means of a visual questionnaire, which are the most preferable to those patients who wear complete dentures. One hundred edentulous patients attending the Manchester Dental Hospital were shown a range of denture labeling methods and asked to rank these according to their preference. The most preferred method was that of an embedded radio frequency identification microchip (38% rated this as first) and the second was an inclusion technique using onion paper (24% rated this as first). The least preferred method was the use of a groove cut into the denture flange with 71% of patients rating this as the poorest in terms of esthetics. The study demonstrates that the method of denture labeling is important to patients and to ensure that denture labeling is performed routinely esthetic preferences must be considered.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>forensic odontostomatol</json:string><json:string>denture identification</json:string><json:string>fitting surface</json:string><json:string>metal band</json:string><json:string>forensic dentistry</json:string><json:string>onion skin</json:string><json:string>current study</json:string><json:string>skelton house</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string><json:string>preferred method</json:string><json:string>tissue paper</json:string><json:string>various methods</json:string><json:string>pmma strip</json:string><json:string>oral rehabil</json:string><json:string>forensic sciences</json:string><json:string>predrilled hole</json:string><json:string>light cure resin</json:string><json:string>photographic slide</json:string><json:string>complete dentures</json:string><json:string>mark dentures</json:string><json:string>additional information</json:string><json:string>dental health unit</json:string><json:string>rfid transponder chip</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Raymond Richmond B.Sc., M.Phil.</name><affiliations><json:string>Forensic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester M15 6FH, U.K.</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Iain A. Pretty B.D.S. (Hons), M.Sc., Ph.D., M.F.D.S. R.C.S. (Ed)</name><affiliations><json:string>Dental Health Unit, School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, 3A Skelton House, Manchester Science Park, Manchester M15 6SH, U.K.</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>forensic science</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dentures</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>prostheses</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>labeling</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>identification</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>JFO586</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-6550VFDB-H</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>technicalNote</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Abstract: Dental forensic organizations world wide have recommended that dental prostheses should be labeled with at least the patient's (wearer's) name and preferably with further unique identifiers such as social security number. A range of methods are available and the purpose of this study was to determine, via the means of a visual questionnaire, which are the most preferable to those patients who wear complete dentures. One hundred edentulous patients attending the Manchester Dental Hospital were shown a range of denture labeling methods and asked to rank these according to their preference. The most preferred method was that of an embedded radio frequency identification microchip (38% rated this as first) and the second was an inclusion technique using onion paper (24% rated this as first). The least preferred method was the use of a groove cut into the denture flange with 71% of patients rating this as the poorest in terms of esthetics. The study demonstrates that the method of denture labeling is important to patients and to ensure that denture labeling is performed routinely esthetic preferences must be considered.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.676</score><pdfWordCount>2516</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>15019</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>5</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>584.957 x 782.986 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>180</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1143</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>6</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Denture Marking—Patient Preference of Various Methods</title><pmid><json:string>18093064</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Forensic Sciences</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1556-4029</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0022-1198</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1556-4029</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JFO</json:string></publisherId><volume>52</volume><issue>6</issue><pages><first>1338</first><last>1342</last><total>5</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2007</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>SPSS Inc., Chicago</json:string><json:string>Brother Co., Toronto</json:string><json:string>University of Manchester</json:string><json:string>American Academy of Forensic Sciences RICHMOND AND PRETTY</json:string><json:string>Stockport Local Research Ethics Committee</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>M.Sc</json:string><json:string>U.K. Received</json:string><json:string>Preference</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>RICHMOND</json:string><json:string>Canada</json:string><json:string>Manchester</json:string><json:string>Cambridge</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-6550VFDB-H</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - medicine, legal</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - legal & forensic medicine</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Life Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology</json:string><json:string>3 - Genetics</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - Pathology and Forensic Medicine</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2007</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2007</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00586.x</json:string></doi><id>1EE41587FB82CB18EC5827EBD6619E849AC347B8</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/1EE41587FB82CB18EC5827EBD6619E849AC347B8/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/1EE41587FB82CB18EC5827EBD6619E849AC347B8/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/1EE41587FB82CB18EC5827EBD6619E849AC347B8/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Denture Marking—Patient Preference of Various Methods</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-11"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="technicalNote" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Denture Marking—Patient Preference of Various Methods</title><title level="a" type="short">DENTURE MARKING</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Raymond</forename><surname>Richmond</surname><roleName type="degree">B.Sc., M.Phil.</roleName></persName><affiliation>Forensic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester M15 6FH, U.K.</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Iain A.</forename><surname>Pretty</surname><roleName type="degree">B.D.S. (Hons), M.Sc., Ph.D., M.F.D.S. R.C.S. (Ed)</roleName></persName><affiliation>Dental Health Unit, School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, 3A Skelton House, Manchester Science Park, Manchester M15 6SH, U.K.</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">1EE41587FB82CB18EC5827EBD6619E849AC347B8</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-6550VFDB-H</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00586.x</idno><idno type="unit">JFO586</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JFO.JFO586.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Forensic Sciences</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES</title><idno type="pISSN">0022-1198</idno><idno type="eISSN">1556-4029</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1556-4029</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/jfo.2007.52.issue-6</idno><idno type="product">JFO</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">52</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1338">1338</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1342">1342</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">5</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-11"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p><hi rend="bold">Abstract: </hi> Dental forensic organizations world wide have recommended that dental prostheses should be labeled with at least the patient's (wearer's) name and preferably with further unique identifiers such as social security number. A range of methods are available and the purpose of this study was to determine, via the means of a visual questionnaire, which are the most preferable to those patients who wear complete dentures. One hundred edentulous patients attending the Manchester Dental Hospital were shown a range of denture labeling methods and asked to rank these according to their preference. The most preferred method was that of an embedded radio frequency identification microchip (38% rated this as first) and the second was an inclusion technique using onion paper (24% rated this as first). The least preferred method was the use of a groove cut into the denture flange with 71% of patients rating this as the poorest in terms of esthetics. The study demonstrates that the method of denture labeling is important to patients and to ensure that denture labeling is performed routinely esthetic preferences must be considered.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">forensic science</term><term xml:id="k2">dentures</term><term xml:id="k3">prostheses</term><term xml:id="k4">labeling</term><term xml:id="k5">identification</term><term xml:id="k6">dental</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Odontology</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading2"><term>Technical Notes</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/1EE41587FB82CB18EC5827EBD6619E849AC347B8/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1556-4029</doi><issn type="print">0022-1198</issn><issn type="electronic">1556-4029</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JFO"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES">Journal of Forensic Sciences</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="11006"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/jfo.2007.52.issue-6</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="52">52</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="6">6</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2007-11">November 2007</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="technicalNote" position="16" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00586.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JFO586"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="5"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Odontology</title><title type="tocHeading2"><i>Technical Notes</i></title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2007-12-10"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2007-12-10"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.5 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-04-06"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-30"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-30"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="1338">1338</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="1342">1342</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Additional information and reprint requests:
Iain A Pretty, B.D.S., Ph.D.
Dental Health Unit
3A Skelton House, Lloyd Street North
Manchester Science Park
Manchester M15 6SH, U.K.
E‐mail: <email>iain.pretty@manchester.ac.uk</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JFO.JFO586.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Received 18 Nov. 2006; and in revised form 4 June 2007; accepted 24 June 2007; published 21 Dec. 2007.</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="10"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="2"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Denture Marking—Patient Preference of Various Methods</title><title type="shortAuthors">RICHMOND AND PRETTY</title><title type="short">DENTURE MARKING</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Raymond</givenNames><familyName>Richmond</familyName><degrees>B.Sc., M.Phil.</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Iain A.</givenNames><familyName>Pretty</familyName><degrees>B.D.S. (Hons), M.Sc., Ph.D., M.F.D.S. R.C.S. (Ed)</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation>Forensic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester M15 6FH, U.K.</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2"><unparsedAffiliation>Dental Health Unit, School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, 3A Skelton House, Manchester Science Park, Manchester M15 6SH, U.K.</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">forensic science</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">dentures</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">prostheses</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">labeling</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">identification</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">dental</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><b>Abstract: </b> Dental forensic organizations world wide have recommended that dental prostheses should be labeled with at least the patient's (wearer's) name and preferably with further unique identifiers such as social security number. A range of methods are available and the purpose of this study was to determine, via the means of a visual questionnaire, which are the most preferable to those patients who wear complete dentures. One hundred edentulous patients attending the Manchester Dental Hospital were shown a range of denture labeling methods and asked to rank these according to their preference. The most preferred method was that of an embedded radio frequency identification microchip (38% rated this as first) and the second was an inclusion technique using onion paper (24% rated this as first). The least preferred method was the use of a groove cut into the denture flange with 71% of patients rating this as the poorest in terms of esthetics. The study demonstrates that the method of denture labeling is important to patients and to ensure that denture labeling is performed routinely esthetic preferences must be considered.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Denture Marking—Patient Preference of Various Methods</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>DENTURE MARKING</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Denture Marking—Patient Preference of Various Methods</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Raymond</namePart><namePart type="family">Richmond</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">B.Sc., M.Phil.</namePart><affiliation>Forensic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester M15 6FH, U.K.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Iain A.</namePart><namePart type="family">Pretty</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">B.D.S. (Hons), M.Sc., Ph.D., M.F.D.S. R.C.S. (Ed)</namePart><affiliation>Dental Health Unit, School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, 3A Skelton House, Manchester Science Park, Manchester M15 6SH, U.K.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="technicalNote" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2007-11</dateIssued><edition>Received 18 Nov. 2006; and in revised form 4 June 2007; accepted 24 June 2007; published 21 Dec. 2007.</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2007</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">10</extent><extent unit="tables">2</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Abstract: Dental forensic organizations world wide have recommended that dental prostheses should be labeled with at least the patient's (wearer's) name and preferably with further unique identifiers such as social security number. A range of methods are available and the purpose of this study was to determine, via the means of a visual questionnaire, which are the most preferable to those patients who wear complete dentures. One hundred edentulous patients attending the Manchester Dental Hospital were shown a range of denture labeling methods and asked to rank these according to their preference. The most preferred method was that of an embedded radio frequency identification microchip (38% rated this as first) and the second was an inclusion technique using onion paper (24% rated this as first). The least preferred method was the use of a groove cut into the denture flange with 71% of patients rating this as the poorest in terms of esthetics. The study demonstrates that the method of denture labeling is important to patients and to ensure that denture labeling is performed routinely esthetic preferences must be considered.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>forensic science</topic><topic>dentures</topic><topic>prostheses</topic><topic>labeling</topic><topic>identification</topic><topic>dental</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Forensic Sciences</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0022-1198</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1556-4029</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1556-4029</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JFO</identifier><part><date>2007</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>52</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>6</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>1338</start><end>1342</end><total>5</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">1EE41587FB82CB18EC5827EBD6619E849AC347B8</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-6550VFDB-H</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00586.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JFO586</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/1EE41587FB82CB18EC5827EBD6619E849AC347B8/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000F42 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000F42 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:1EE41587FB82CB18EC5827EBD6619E849AC347B8
|texte= Denture Marking—Patient Preference of Various Methods
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |