Effects of simulated herbivory in three old field Compositae with different inflorescence architectures
Identifieur interne : 007745 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 007744; suivant : 007746Effects of simulated herbivory in three old field Compositae with different inflorescence architectures
Auteurs : J. Escarré ; J. Lepart ; J. J. SentucSource :
- Oecologia [ 0029-8549 ] ; 1996-03-01.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Apical, Biomass, Capitulum, Clipping, Comparative effects, Crepis, Defoliation, Early defoliation, Ecology, First analysis, Flowering, Foetida, Herbivore, Herbivory, Hieracioides, Individual plants, Ipomopsis aggregata, Late defoliation, Late removal, Leaf area, Little effect, Main flowering, Maternal families, Natural conditions, Oecologia, Overcompensation, Paige, Personal observations, Picris, Picris hieracioides, Pulchra, Rosette, Sexual biomass, Significant effect, Variance, Vegetative, Vegetative biomass, Whitham.
- Teeft :
- Apical, Biomass, Capitulum, Clipping, Comparative effects, Crepis, Defoliation, Early defoliation, Ecology, First analysis, Flowering, Foetida, Herbivore, Herbivory, Hieracioides, Individual plants, Ipomopsis aggregata, Late defoliation, Late removal, Leaf area, Little effect, Main flowering, Maternal families, Natural conditions, Oecologia, Overcompensation, Paige, Personal observations, Picris, Picris hieracioides, Pulchra, Rosette, Sexual biomass, Significant effect, Variance, Vegetative, Vegetative biomass, Whitham.
Abstract
Abstract: The effects of simulated herbivory (early or late defoliation and cutting of the flowering shoot) on the growth and reproduction of three species of monocarpic composite forbs (Crepis pulchra, Picris hieracioides and C. foetida) with different inflorescence architectures were studied in experimental plots. For the three species studied, early defoliation had no significant effect on subsequent growth. In contrast, late defoliation, occurring at the start of the season of drought, had a negative effect on growth and reproduction in the two Crepis species, particularly C. foetida, but had less effect on P. hieracioides. Sexual biomass was more clearly affected by late defoliation than was vegetative biomass, although the effects differed markedly among species possibly as a result of differences in phenology. Clipping the flowering shoot removed about 3 times less biomass than late defoliation and had little effect on vegetative biomass. It had much greater effects on the sexual biomass in P. hieracioides and C. pulchra, and resulted in the production of many shoots sprouting from the rosette, allowing the treated plants to regain a vegetative biomass close to that of control plants. Clipping did however lead to the production of shorter shoots and a reduction in the number of capitula formed. In C. foetida, much branching occurred even when the main shoot was not cut; the architecture of individual plants was therefore only slightly changed by clipping the apical bud and the sexual biomass of this species was not affected by ablation of the flowering shoot. Overcompensation was found in only two families of C. pulchra for vegetative biomass. No over-compensation was found for sexual biomass, despite an increase in the number of flowering shoots in C. pulchra and P. hieracioides following clipping. However situations close to compensation for the vegetative biomass in the three species and in P. hieracioides for the sexual biomass were recorded. The response of the three study species to simulated herbivory were related to their architecture and to the time of defoliation.
Url:
DOI: 10.1007/BF00330013
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:F0EE01CD34BB1FA05082A239824F63C6EF53F86BLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Effects of simulated herbivory in three old field Compositae with different inflorescence architectures</title><author><name sortKey="Escarre, J" sort="Escarre, J" uniqKey="Escarre J" first="J." last="Escarré">J. Escarré</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>CEFE/CNRS, BP 5051, F-34033, Montpellier Cedex, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: escarre@cefe.cnrs-mop.fr</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lepart, J" sort="Lepart, J" uniqKey="Lepart J" first="J." last="Lepart">J. Lepart</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>CEFE/CNRS, BP 5051, F-34033, Montpellier Cedex, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sentuc, J J" sort="Sentuc, J J" uniqKey="Sentuc J" first="J. J." last="Sentuc">J. J. Sentuc</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>CEFE/CNRS, BP 5051, F-34033, Montpellier Cedex, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:F0EE01CD34BB1FA05082A239824F63C6EF53F86B</idno><date when="1996" year="1996">1996</date><idno type="doi">10.1007/BF00330013</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/F0EE01CD34BB1FA05082A239824F63C6EF53F86B/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">007745</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">007745</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Effects of simulated herbivory in three old field Compositae with different inflorescence architectures</title><author><name sortKey="Escarre, J" sort="Escarre, J" uniqKey="Escarre J" first="J." last="Escarré">J. Escarré</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>CEFE/CNRS, BP 5051, F-34033, Montpellier Cedex, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: escarre@cefe.cnrs-mop.fr</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lepart, J" sort="Lepart, J" uniqKey="Lepart J" first="J." last="Lepart">J. Lepart</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>CEFE/CNRS, BP 5051, F-34033, Montpellier Cedex, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sentuc, J J" sort="Sentuc, J J" uniqKey="Sentuc J" first="J. J." last="Sentuc">J. J. Sentuc</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>CEFE/CNRS, BP 5051, F-34033, Montpellier Cedex, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Oecologia</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Oecologia</title><idno type="ISSN">0029-8549</idno><idno type="eISSN">1432-1939</idno><imprint><publisher>Springer-Verlag</publisher><pubPlace>Berlin/Heidelberg</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1996-03-01">1996-03-01</date><biblScope unit="volume">105</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="501">501</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="508">508</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0029-8549</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0029-8549</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Apical</term><term>Biomass</term><term>Capitulum</term><term>Clipping</term><term>Comparative effects</term><term>Crepis</term><term>Defoliation</term><term>Early defoliation</term><term>Ecology</term><term>First analysis</term><term>Flowering</term><term>Foetida</term><term>Herbivore</term><term>Herbivory</term><term>Hieracioides</term><term>Individual plants</term><term>Ipomopsis aggregata</term><term>Late defoliation</term><term>Late removal</term><term>Leaf area</term><term>Little effect</term><term>Main flowering</term><term>Maternal families</term><term>Natural conditions</term><term>Oecologia</term><term>Overcompensation</term><term>Paige</term><term>Personal observations</term><term>Picris</term><term>Picris hieracioides</term><term>Pulchra</term><term>Rosette</term><term>Sexual biomass</term><term>Significant effect</term><term>Variance</term><term>Vegetative</term><term>Vegetative biomass</term><term>Whitham</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Apical</term><term>Biomass</term><term>Capitulum</term><term>Clipping</term><term>Comparative effects</term><term>Crepis</term><term>Defoliation</term><term>Early defoliation</term><term>Ecology</term><term>First analysis</term><term>Flowering</term><term>Foetida</term><term>Herbivore</term><term>Herbivory</term><term>Hieracioides</term><term>Individual plants</term><term>Ipomopsis aggregata</term><term>Late defoliation</term><term>Late removal</term><term>Leaf area</term><term>Little effect</term><term>Main flowering</term><term>Maternal families</term><term>Natural conditions</term><term>Oecologia</term><term>Overcompensation</term><term>Paige</term><term>Personal observations</term><term>Picris</term><term>Picris hieracioides</term><term>Pulchra</term><term>Rosette</term><term>Sexual biomass</term><term>Significant effect</term><term>Variance</term><term>Vegetative</term><term>Vegetative biomass</term><term>Whitham</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: The effects of simulated herbivory (early or late defoliation and cutting of the flowering shoot) on the growth and reproduction of three species of monocarpic composite forbs (Crepis pulchra, Picris hieracioides and C. foetida) with different inflorescence architectures were studied in experimental plots. For the three species studied, early defoliation had no significant effect on subsequent growth. In contrast, late defoliation, occurring at the start of the season of drought, had a negative effect on growth and reproduction in the two Crepis species, particularly C. foetida, but had less effect on P. hieracioides. Sexual biomass was more clearly affected by late defoliation than was vegetative biomass, although the effects differed markedly among species possibly as a result of differences in phenology. Clipping the flowering shoot removed about 3 times less biomass than late defoliation and had little effect on vegetative biomass. It had much greater effects on the sexual biomass in P. hieracioides and C. pulchra, and resulted in the production of many shoots sprouting from the rosette, allowing the treated plants to regain a vegetative biomass close to that of control plants. Clipping did however lead to the production of shorter shoots and a reduction in the number of capitula formed. In C. foetida, much branching occurred even when the main shoot was not cut; the architecture of individual plants was therefore only slightly changed by clipping the apical bud and the sexual biomass of this species was not affected by ablation of the flowering shoot. Overcompensation was found in only two families of C. pulchra for vegetative biomass. No over-compensation was found for sexual biomass, despite an increase in the number of flowering shoots in C. pulchra and P. hieracioides following clipping. However situations close to compensation for the vegetative biomass in the three species and in P. hieracioides for the sexual biomass were recorded. The response of the three study species to simulated herbivory were related to their architecture and to the time of defoliation.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>springer</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>defoliation</json:string><json:string>biomass</json:string><json:string>clipping</json:string><json:string>hieracioides</json:string><json:string>sexual biomass</json:string><json:string>herbivory</json:string><json:string>pulchra</json:string><json:string>foetida</json:string><json:string>vegetative</json:string><json:string>late defoliation</json:string><json:string>overcompensation</json:string><json:string>vegetative biomass</json:string><json:string>herbivore</json:string><json:string>crepis</json:string><json:string>rosette</json:string><json:string>whitham</json:string><json:string>picris</json:string><json:string>capitulum</json:string><json:string>oecologia</json:string><json:string>main flowering</json:string><json:string>paige</json:string><json:string>picris hieracioides</json:string><json:string>apical</json:string><json:string>ecology</json:string><json:string>leaf area</json:string><json:string>flowering</json:string><json:string>significant effect</json:string><json:string>ipomopsis aggregata</json:string><json:string>late removal</json:string><json:string>comparative effects</json:string><json:string>variance</json:string><json:string>early defoliation</json:string><json:string>little effect</json:string><json:string>first analysis</json:string><json:string>maternal families</json:string><json:string>personal observations</json:string><json:string>natural conditions</json:string><json:string>individual plants</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>J. Escarré</name><affiliations><json:string>CEFE/CNRS, BP 5051, F-34033, Montpellier Cedex, France</json:string><json:string>E-mail: escarre@cefe.cnrs-mop.fr</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>J. Lepart</name><affiliations><json:string>CEFE/CNRS, BP 5051, F-34033, Montpellier Cedex, France</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>J. J. Sentuc</name><affiliations><json:string>CEFE/CNRS, BP 5051, F-34033, Montpellier Cedex, France</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>BF00330013</json:string><json:string>Art11</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/1BB-C8R09KRN-B</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>OriginalPaper</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Abstract: The effects of simulated herbivory (early or late defoliation and cutting of the flowering shoot) on the growth and reproduction of three species of monocarpic composite forbs (Crepis pulchra, Picris hieracioides and C. foetida) with different inflorescence architectures were studied in experimental plots. For the three species studied, early defoliation had no significant effect on subsequent growth. In contrast, late defoliation, occurring at the start of the season of drought, had a negative effect on growth and reproduction in the two Crepis species, particularly C. foetida, but had less effect on P. hieracioides. Sexual biomass was more clearly affected by late defoliation than was vegetative biomass, although the effects differed markedly among species possibly as a result of differences in phenology. Clipping the flowering shoot removed about 3 times less biomass than late defoliation and had little effect on vegetative biomass. It had much greater effects on the sexual biomass in P. hieracioides and C. pulchra, and resulted in the production of many shoots sprouting from the rosette, allowing the treated plants to regain a vegetative biomass close to that of control plants. Clipping did however lead to the production of shorter shoots and a reduction in the number of capitula formed. In C. foetida, much branching occurred even when the main shoot was not cut; the architecture of individual plants was therefore only slightly changed by clipping the apical bud and the sexual biomass of this species was not affected by ablation of the flowering shoot. Overcompensation was found in only two families of C. pulchra for vegetative biomass. No over-compensation was found for sexual biomass, despite an increase in the number of flowering shoots in C. pulchra and P. hieracioides following clipping. However situations close to compensation for the vegetative biomass in the three species and in P. hieracioides for the sexual biomass were recorded. The response of the three study species to simulated herbivory were related to their architecture and to the time of defoliation.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>10</score><pdfWordCount>5258</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>31054</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>8</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>597.28 x 785 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>329</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>2117</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>0</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Effects of simulated herbivory in three old field Compositae with different inflorescence architectures</title><pmid><json:string>28307143</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><title>Oecologia</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><publicationDate>1996</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1996</copyrightDate><issn><json:string>0029-8549</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1432-1939</json:string></eissn><journalId><json:string>442</json:string></journalId><volume>105</volume><issue>4</issue><pages><first>501</first><last>508</last></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Ecology</value></json:item><json:item><value>Plant Sciences</value></json:item></subject></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1994-10-05</json:string><json:string>1992</json:string><json:string>1993</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>J. Lepart</json:string><json:string>J. Escarr</json:string><json:string>J. Sentuc</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Montpellier</json:string><json:string>France</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Lubbers and Lechowicz 1989</json:string><json:string>Rockwood 1973</json:string><json:string>Dyer et al. 1993</json:string><json:string>Brown and Gange 1990</json:string><json:string>Paige 1994</json:string><json:string>Jameson 1963</json:string><json:string>Huntly 1991</json:string><json:string>McNaughton 1983</json:string><json:string>Day and Quinn 1989</json:string><json:string>Coste 1937</json:string><json:string>Painter and Belsky 1993</json:string><json:string>Gedge and Maun (1992)</json:string><json:string>Maschinski and Whitham (1989)</json:string><json:string>Marquis (1984)</json:string><json:string>Maschinski and Whitham 1989</json:string><json:string>Alward and Joen 1993</json:string><json:string>Hjalten et al. (1993)</json:string><json:string>Doak 1992</json:string><json:string>Bergelson and Crawley 1992</json:string><json:string>Painter and Delting 1981</json:string><json:string>Mauricio et al. (1993)</json:string><json:string>McNaughton 1986</json:string><json:string>Obeso 1993</json:string><json:string>Brown and Gange 1992</json:string><json:string>Chapin et al. 1987</json:string><json:string>Zar 1984</json:string><json:string>Hendrix 1988</json:string><json:string>Alward and Joern 1993</json:string><json:string>Lubbers and Lechowicz (1989)</json:string><json:string>Hjalten et al. 1993</json:string><json:string>Paige and Whitham 1987</json:string><json:string>Sentuc 1993</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/1BB-C8R09KRN-B</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - ecology</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - natural sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - biology</json:string><json:string>3 - ecology</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Life Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Agricultural and Biological Sciences</json:string><json:string>3 - Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences biologiques fondamentales et appliquees. psychologie</json:string><json:string>4 - ecologie animale, vegetale et microbienne</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>1996</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1996</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1007/BF00330013</json:string></doi><id>F0EE01CD34BB1FA05082A239824F63C6EF53F86B</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F0EE01CD34BB1FA05082A239824F63C6EF53F86B/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F0EE01CD34BB1FA05082A239824F63C6EF53F86B/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/F0EE01CD34BB1FA05082A239824F63C6EF53F86B/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Effects of simulated herbivory in three old field Compositae with different inflorescence architectures</title><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher scheme="https://publisher-list.data.istex.fr">Springer-Verlag</publisher><pubPlace>Berlin/Heidelberg</pubPlace><availability><licence><p>Springer-Verlag, 1996</p></licence><p scheme="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-3XSW68JL-F">springer</p></availability><date>1994-10-05</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="research-article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</note><note type="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note><note>Plant Animal Interactions/Original Paper</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Effects of simulated herbivory in three old field Compositae with different inflorescence architectures</title><author xml:id="author-0000" corresp="yes"><persName><forename type="first">J.</forename><surname>Escarré</surname></persName><email>escarre@cefe.cnrs-mop.fr</email><affiliation>CEFE/CNRS, BP 5051, F-34033, Montpellier Cedex, France</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">J.</forename><surname>Lepart</surname></persName><affiliation>CEFE/CNRS, BP 5051, F-34033, Montpellier Cedex, France</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">J.</forename><surname>Sentuc</surname></persName><affiliation>CEFE/CNRS, BP 5051, F-34033, Montpellier Cedex, France</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">F0EE01CD34BB1FA05082A239824F63C6EF53F86B</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/1BB-C8R09KRN-B</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1007/BF00330013</idno><idno type="article-id">BF00330013</idno><idno type="article-id">Art11</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Oecologia</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Oecologia</title><idno type="pISSN">0029-8549</idno><idno type="eISSN">1432-1939</idno><idno type="journal-ID">true</idno><idno type="issue-article-count">18</idno><idno type="volume-issue-count">4</idno><imprint><publisher>Springer-Verlag</publisher><pubPlace>Berlin/Heidelberg</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1996-03-01"></date><biblScope unit="volume">105</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="501">501</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="508">508</biblScope></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1994-10-05</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Abstract: The effects of simulated herbivory (early or late defoliation and cutting of the flowering shoot) on the growth and reproduction of three species of monocarpic composite forbs (Crepis pulchra, Picris hieracioides and C. foetida) with different inflorescence architectures were studied in experimental plots. For the three species studied, early defoliation had no significant effect on subsequent growth. In contrast, late defoliation, occurring at the start of the season of drought, had a negative effect on growth and reproduction in the two Crepis species, particularly C. foetida, but had less effect on P. hieracioides. Sexual biomass was more clearly affected by late defoliation than was vegetative biomass, although the effects differed markedly among species possibly as a result of differences in phenology. Clipping the flowering shoot removed about 3 times less biomass than late defoliation and had little effect on vegetative biomass. It had much greater effects on the sexual biomass in P. hieracioides and C. pulchra, and resulted in the production of many shoots sprouting from the rosette, allowing the treated plants to regain a vegetative biomass close to that of control plants. Clipping did however lead to the production of shorter shoots and a reduction in the number of capitula formed. In C. foetida, much branching occurred even when the main shoot was not cut; the architecture of individual plants was therefore only slightly changed by clipping the apical bud and the sexual biomass of this species was not affected by ablation of the flowering shoot. Overcompensation was found in only two families of C. pulchra for vegetative biomass. No over-compensation was found for sexual biomass, despite an increase in the number of flowering shoots in C. pulchra and P. hieracioides following clipping. However situations close to compensation for the vegetative biomass in the three species and in P. hieracioides for the sexual biomass were recorded. The response of the three study species to simulated herbivory were related to their architecture and to the time of defoliation.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="Journal Subject"><list><head>Life Sciences</head><item><term>Ecology</term></item><item><term>Plant Sciences</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1994-10-05">Created</change><change when="1996-03-01">Published</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2017-10-3">References added</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F0EE01CD34BB1FA05082A239824F63C6EF53F86B/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Springer, Publisher found" wicri:toSee="no header"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//Springer-Verlag//DTD A++ V2.4//EN" URI="http://devel.springer.de/A++/V2.4/DTD/A++V2.4.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><Publisher><PublisherInfo><PublisherName>Springer-Verlag</PublisherName><PublisherLocation>Berlin/Heidelberg</PublisherLocation></PublisherInfo><Journal><JournalInfo JournalProductType="ArchiveJournal" NumberingStyle="Unnumbered"><JournalID>442</JournalID><JournalPrintISSN>0029-8549</JournalPrintISSN><JournalElectronicISSN>1432-1939</JournalElectronicISSN><JournalTitle>Oecologia</JournalTitle><JournalAbbreviatedTitle>Oecologia</JournalAbbreviatedTitle><JournalSubjectGroup><JournalSubject Type="Primary">Life Sciences</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Ecology</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Plant Sciences</JournalSubject></JournalSubjectGroup></JournalInfo><Volume><VolumeInfo VolumeType="Regular" TocLevels="0"><VolumeIDStart>105</VolumeIDStart><VolumeIDEnd>105</VolumeIDEnd><VolumeIssueCount>4</VolumeIssueCount></VolumeInfo><Issue IssueType="Regular"><IssueInfo TocLevels="0"><IssueIDStart>4</IssueIDStart><IssueIDEnd>4</IssueIDEnd><IssueArticleCount>18</IssueArticleCount><IssueHistory><CoverDate><Year>1996</Year><Month>3</Month></CoverDate></IssueHistory><IssueCopyright><CopyrightHolderName>Springer-Verlag</CopyrightHolderName><CopyrightYear>1996</CopyrightYear></IssueCopyright></IssueInfo><Article ID="Art11"><ArticleInfo Language="En" ArticleType="OriginalPaper" NumberingStyle="Unnumbered" TocLevels="0" ContainsESM="No"><ArticleID>BF00330013</ArticleID><ArticleDOI>10.1007/BF00330013</ArticleDOI><ArticleSequenceNumber>11</ArticleSequenceNumber><ArticleTitle Language="En">Effects of simulated herbivory in three old field Compositae with different inflorescence architectures</ArticleTitle><ArticleCategory>Plant Animal Interactions</ArticleCategory><ArticleSubCategory>Original Paper</ArticleSubCategory><ArticleFirstPage>501</ArticleFirstPage><ArticleLastPage>508</ArticleLastPage><ArticleHistory><RegistrationDate><Year>2004</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>28</Day></RegistrationDate><Received><Year>1994</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>5</Day></Received><Accepted><Year>1995</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>2</Day></Accepted></ArticleHistory><ArticleCopyright><CopyrightHolderName>Springer-Verlag</CopyrightHolderName><CopyrightYear>1996</CopyrightYear></ArticleCopyright><ArticleGrants Type="Regular"><MetadataGrant Grant="OpenAccess"></MetadataGrant><AbstractGrant Grant="OpenAccess"></AbstractGrant><BodyPDFGrant Grant="Restricted"></BodyPDFGrant><BodyHTMLGrant Grant="Restricted"></BodyHTMLGrant><BibliographyGrant Grant="Restricted"></BibliographyGrant><ESMGrant Grant="Restricted"></ESMGrant></ArticleGrants><ArticleContext><JournalID>442</JournalID><VolumeIDStart>105</VolumeIDStart><VolumeIDEnd>105</VolumeIDEnd><IssueIDStart>4</IssueIDStart><IssueIDEnd>4</IssueIDEnd></ArticleContext></ArticleInfo><ArticleHeader><AuthorGroup><Author AffiliationIDS="Aff1" CorrespondingAffiliationID="Aff1"><AuthorName DisplayOrder="Western"><GivenName>J.</GivenName><FamilyName>Escarré</FamilyName></AuthorName><Contact><Fax>33 67 41 21 38</Fax><Email>escarre@cefe.cnrs-mop.fr</Email></Contact></Author><Author AffiliationIDS="Aff1"><AuthorName DisplayOrder="Western"><GivenName>J.</GivenName><FamilyName>Lepart</FamilyName></AuthorName></Author><Author AffiliationIDS="Aff1"><AuthorName DisplayOrder="Western"><GivenName>J.</GivenName><GivenName>J.</GivenName><FamilyName>Sentuc</FamilyName></AuthorName></Author><Affiliation ID="Aff1"><OrgName>CEFE/CNRS</OrgName><OrgAddress><Postbox>BP 5051</Postbox><Postcode>F-34033</Postcode><City>Montpellier Cedex</City><Country>France</Country></OrgAddress></Affiliation></AuthorGroup><Abstract ID="Abs1" Language="En"><Heading>Abstract</Heading><Para>The effects of simulated herbivory (early or late defoliation and cutting of the flowering shoot) on the growth and reproduction of three species of monocarpic composite forbs (<Emphasis Type="Italic">Crepis pulchra, Picris hieracioides</Emphasis> and <Emphasis Type="Italic">C. foetida</Emphasis>) with different inflorescence architectures were studied in experimental plots. For the three species studied, early defoliation had no significant effect on subsequent growth. In contrast, late defoliation, occurring at the start of the season of drought, had a negative effect on growth and reproduction in the two <Emphasis Type="Italic">Crepis</Emphasis> species, particularly <Emphasis Type="Italic">C. foetida</Emphasis>, but had less effect on <Emphasis Type="Italic">P. hieracioides</Emphasis>. Sexual biomass was more clearly affected by late defoliation than was vegetative biomass, although the effects differed markedly among species possibly as a result of differences in phenology. Clipping the flowering shoot removed about 3 times less biomass than late defoliation and had little effect on vegetative biomass. It had much greater effects on the sexual biomass in <Emphasis Type="Italic">P. hieracioides</Emphasis> and <Emphasis Type="Italic">C. pulchra</Emphasis>, and resulted in the production of many shoots sprouting from the rosette, allowing the treated plants to regain a vegetative biomass close to that of control plants. Clipping did however lead to the production of shorter shoots and a reduction in the number of capitula formed. In <Emphasis Type="Italic">C. foetida</Emphasis>, much branching occurred even when the main shoot was not cut; the architecture of individual plants was therefore only slightly changed by clipping the apical bud and the sexual biomass of this species was not affected by ablation of the flowering shoot. Overcompensation was found in only two families of <Emphasis Type="Italic">C. pulchra</Emphasis> for vegetative biomass. No over-compensation was found for sexual biomass, despite an increase in the number of flowering shoots in <Emphasis Type="Italic">C. pulchra</Emphasis> and <Emphasis Type="Italic">P. hieracioides</Emphasis> following clipping. However situations close to compensation for the vegetative biomass in the three species and in <Emphasis Type="Italic">P. hieracioides</Emphasis> for the sexual biomass were recorded. The response of the three study species to simulated herbivory were related to their architecture and to the time of defoliation.</Para></Abstract><KeywordGroup Language="En"><Heading>Key words</Heading><Keyword>Herbivory</Keyword><Keyword>Compensation</Keyword><Keyword><Emphasis Type="Italic">Crepis foetida</Emphasis></Keyword><Keyword><Emphasis Type="Italic">Crepis pulchra</Emphasis></Keyword><Keyword><Emphasis Type="Italic">Picris hieracioides</Emphasis></Keyword></KeywordGroup></ArticleHeader><NoBody></NoBody></Article></Issue></Volume></Journal></Publisher></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Effects of simulated herbivory in three old field Compositae with different inflorescence architectures</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Effects of simulated herbivory in three old field Compositae with different inflorescence architectures</title></titleInfo><name type="personal" displayLabel="corresp"><namePart type="given">J.</namePart><namePart type="family">Escarré</namePart><affiliation>CEFE/CNRS, BP 5051, F-34033, Montpellier Cedex, France</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: escarre@cefe.cnrs-mop.fr</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">J.</namePart><namePart type="family">Lepart</namePart><affiliation>CEFE/CNRS, BP 5051, F-34033, Montpellier Cedex, France</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">J.</namePart><namePart type="given">J.</namePart><namePart type="family">Sentuc</namePart><affiliation>CEFE/CNRS, BP 5051, F-34033, Montpellier Cedex, France</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="OriginalPaper" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Springer-Verlag</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Berlin/Heidelberg</placeTerm></place><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">1994-10-05</dateCreated><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1996-03-01</dateIssued><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1996</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1996</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><abstract lang="en">Abstract: The effects of simulated herbivory (early or late defoliation and cutting of the flowering shoot) on the growth and reproduction of three species of monocarpic composite forbs (Crepis pulchra, Picris hieracioides and C. foetida) with different inflorescence architectures were studied in experimental plots. For the three species studied, early defoliation had no significant effect on subsequent growth. In contrast, late defoliation, occurring at the start of the season of drought, had a negative effect on growth and reproduction in the two Crepis species, particularly C. foetida, but had less effect on P. hieracioides. Sexual biomass was more clearly affected by late defoliation than was vegetative biomass, although the effects differed markedly among species possibly as a result of differences in phenology. Clipping the flowering shoot removed about 3 times less biomass than late defoliation and had little effect on vegetative biomass. It had much greater effects on the sexual biomass in P. hieracioides and C. pulchra, and resulted in the production of many shoots sprouting from the rosette, allowing the treated plants to regain a vegetative biomass close to that of control plants. Clipping did however lead to the production of shorter shoots and a reduction in the number of capitula formed. In C. foetida, much branching occurred even when the main shoot was not cut; the architecture of individual plants was therefore only slightly changed by clipping the apical bud and the sexual biomass of this species was not affected by ablation of the flowering shoot. Overcompensation was found in only two families of C. pulchra for vegetative biomass. No over-compensation was found for sexual biomass, despite an increase in the number of flowering shoots in C. pulchra and P. hieracioides following clipping. However situations close to compensation for the vegetative biomass in the three species and in P. hieracioides for the sexual biomass were recorded. The response of the three study species to simulated herbivory were related to their architecture and to the time of defoliation.</abstract><note>Plant Animal Interactions/Original Paper</note><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Oecologia</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Oecologia</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" displayLabel="Archive Journal" authority="ISTEX" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><originInfo><publisher>Springer</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1996-03-01</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1996</copyrightDate></originInfo><subject><genre>Life Sciences</genre><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0029-8549</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1432-1939</identifier><identifier type="JournalID">442</identifier><identifier type="IssueArticleCount">18</identifier><identifier type="VolumeIssueCount">4</identifier><part><date>1996</date><detail type="volume"><number>105</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="issue"><number>4</number><caption>no.</caption></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>501</start><end>508</end></extent></part><recordInfo><recordOrigin>Springer-Verlag, 1996</recordOrigin></recordInfo></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">F0EE01CD34BB1FA05082A239824F63C6EF53F86B</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/1BB-C8R09KRN-B</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1007/BF00330013</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">BF00330013</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">Art11</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Springer-Verlag, 1996</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-3XSW68JL-F">springer</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Springer-Verlag, 1996</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F0EE01CD34BB1FA05082A239824F63C6EF53F86B/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 007745 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 007745 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:F0EE01CD34BB1FA05082A239824F63C6EF53F86B
|texte= Effects of simulated herbivory in three old field Compositae with different inflorescence architectures
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |