The relationship between satisfaction with mouth and number, position and condition of teeth: studies in Brazilian adults
Identifieur interne : 007744 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 007743; suivant : 007745The relationship between satisfaction with mouth and number, position and condition of teeth: studies in Brazilian adults
Auteurs : A. C. Elias ; A. SheihamSource :
- Journal of Oral Rehabilitation [ 0305-182X ] ; 1999-01.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Anterior teeth, Baseline, Bjorn owall, Blackwell science, Brazilian, Brazilian studies, Carlsson, Clinical examinations, Community dentistry, Complete dentition, Decayed teeth, Dental, Dental arch, Dental arches, Dental condition, Dental conditions, Dental groups, Dental status, Dentistry, Dentition, Denture, Denture wearers, Direct relationship, Dmft, Dmft index, Edentulous, Eichner, Eichner index, Elderly people, Elderly population, Elia, Functional units, High dmft, Higher percentage, Kayser, Leake, Lled, Lled teeth, Logistic model, Logistic regression model, Longitudinal, Longitudinal baseline, Longitudinal studies, Longitudinal study, Lower levels, Lower number, Lower numbers, Main hypothesis, Main purpose, Masticatory, Meeuwissen, Molar, Molar pairs, Molar teeth, Multiple regression, Natural teeth, Ndings, Occlusal, Occlusal stability, Open spaces, Oral comfort, Oral condition, Oral function, Oral health, Oral health status, Oral rehabilitation, Oral status, Other studies, Owall, Owall taylor, Partial dentures, Pearson correlation, Periodontal, Periodontal disease, Periodontal pockets, Pilot study, Posterior, Posterior teeth, Premolar, Premolar pairs, Premolar pairs number, Premolar teeth, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Prosthetic treatment, Reisine, Reisine bailit, Removable, Rosenoer sheiham, Same methods, Same proportion, Same trend, Same variables, Satisfaction, Satisfaction levels, Sheiham, Sheiham table, Social classes, Sociodental indicators, Subgroup, Subjective measures, Subjective perception, Support zones, Total satisfaction, Wearer, Whole sample, Witter.
- Teeft :
- Anterior teeth, Baseline, Bjorn owall, Blackwell science, Brazilian, Brazilian studies, Carlsson, Clinical examinations, Community dentistry, Complete dentition, Decayed teeth, Dental, Dental arch, Dental arches, Dental condition, Dental conditions, Dental groups, Dental status, Dentistry, Dentition, Denture, Denture wearers, Direct relationship, Dmft, Dmft index, Edentulous, Eichner, Eichner index, Elderly people, Elderly population, Elia, Functional units, High dmft, Higher percentage, Kayser, Leake, Lled, Lled teeth, Logistic model, Logistic regression model, Longitudinal, Longitudinal baseline, Longitudinal studies, Longitudinal study, Lower levels, Lower number, Lower numbers, Main hypothesis, Main purpose, Masticatory, Meeuwissen, Molar, Molar pairs, Molar teeth, Multiple regression, Natural teeth, Ndings, Occlusal, Occlusal stability, Open spaces, Oral comfort, Oral condition, Oral function, Oral health, Oral health status, Oral rehabilitation, Oral status, Other studies, Owall, Owall taylor, Partial dentures, Pearson correlation, Periodontal, Periodontal disease, Periodontal pockets, Pilot study, Posterior, Posterior teeth, Premolar, Premolar pairs, Premolar pairs number, Premolar teeth, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Prosthetic treatment, Reisine, Reisine bailit, Removable, Rosenoer sheiham, Same methods, Same proportion, Same trend, Same variables, Satisfaction, Satisfaction levels, Sheiham, Sheiham table, Social classes, Sociodental indicators, Subgroup, Subjective measures, Subjective perception, Support zones, Total satisfaction, Wearer, Whole sample, Witter.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to analyse adults’ subjective perception of satisfaction in relation to number, position and condition of natural teeth. Subjective perception of satisfaction was assessed by interview. Dental status was assessed. Two types of survey were carried out in Brazil: a longitudinal and a cross‐sectional survey. The longitudinal study commenced in 1990, with 227 dentate people aged 45–54 years, of two social classes. Of the 227 subjects examined in 1990, 126 were re‐examined and interviewed 3 years later. The cross‐sectional survey used the same methods used for the longitudinal study. Six hundred and fifty‐seven dentate males aged from 35 to 54 years were examined and interviewed. There was a positive correlation between satisfaction and position of teeth. Premolar pairs had a higher correlation with satisfaction in both studies. Anterior teeth were the most significant predictors of satisfaction. There was no difference in the percentage of satisfied persons between the baseline and follow‐up studies. The results indicate that adults with three premolar pairs and intact anterior sextants were satisfied with their oral status. Keeping a certain number of teeth, depending on their position and condition, gave more satisfaction than having the missing teeth replaced with partial dentures.
Url:
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00319.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:F0E610E981E9A4BA1495732566739D6EBF22B49BLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The relationship between satisfaction with mouth and number, position and condition of teeth: studies in Brazilian adults</title><author><name sortKey="Elias, A C" sort="Elias, A C" uniqKey="Elias A" first="A. C." last="Elias">A. C. Elias</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Dental Public Health, University College London Medical School and St Bartholomew’s and The Royal London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, U.K.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sheiham, A" sort="Sheiham, A" uniqKey="Sheiham A" first="A." last="Sheiham">A. Sheiham</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Dental Public Health, University College London Medical School and St Bartholomew’s and The Royal London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, U.K.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:F0E610E981E9A4BA1495732566739D6EBF22B49B</idno><date when="1999" year="1999">1999</date><idno type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00319.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/F0E610E981E9A4BA1495732566739D6EBF22B49B/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">007744</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">007744</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The relationship between satisfaction with mouth and number, position and condition of teeth: studies in Brazilian adults</title><author><name sortKey="Elias, A C" sort="Elias, A C" uniqKey="Elias A" first="A. C." last="Elias">A. C. Elias</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Dental Public Health, University College London Medical School and St Bartholomew’s and The Royal London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, U.K.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sheiham, A" sort="Sheiham, A" uniqKey="Sheiham A" first="A." last="Sheiham">A. Sheiham</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Dental Public Health, University College London Medical School and St Bartholomew’s and The Royal London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, U.K.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">26</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="53">53</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="71">71</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">19</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1999-01">1999-01</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Anterior teeth</term><term>Baseline</term><term>Bjorn owall</term><term>Blackwell science</term><term>Brazilian</term><term>Brazilian studies</term><term>Carlsson</term><term>Clinical examinations</term><term>Community dentistry</term><term>Complete dentition</term><term>Decayed teeth</term><term>Dental</term><term>Dental arch</term><term>Dental arches</term><term>Dental condition</term><term>Dental conditions</term><term>Dental groups</term><term>Dental status</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Dentition</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture wearers</term><term>Direct relationship</term><term>Dmft</term><term>Dmft index</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Eichner</term><term>Eichner index</term><term>Elderly people</term><term>Elderly population</term><term>Elia</term><term>Functional units</term><term>High dmft</term><term>Higher percentage</term><term>Kayser</term><term>Leake</term><term>Lled</term><term>Lled teeth</term><term>Logistic model</term><term>Logistic regression model</term><term>Longitudinal</term><term>Longitudinal baseline</term><term>Longitudinal studies</term><term>Longitudinal study</term><term>Lower levels</term><term>Lower number</term><term>Lower numbers</term><term>Main hypothesis</term><term>Main purpose</term><term>Masticatory</term><term>Meeuwissen</term><term>Molar</term><term>Molar pairs</term><term>Molar teeth</term><term>Multiple regression</term><term>Natural teeth</term><term>Ndings</term><term>Occlusal</term><term>Occlusal stability</term><term>Open spaces</term><term>Oral comfort</term><term>Oral condition</term><term>Oral function</term><term>Oral health</term><term>Oral health status</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Oral status</term><term>Other studies</term><term>Owall</term><term>Owall taylor</term><term>Partial dentures</term><term>Pearson correlation</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontal disease</term><term>Periodontal pockets</term><term>Pilot study</term><term>Posterior</term><term>Posterior teeth</term><term>Premolar</term><term>Premolar pairs</term><term>Premolar pairs number</term><term>Premolar teeth</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Prosthetic treatment</term><term>Reisine</term><term>Reisine bailit</term><term>Removable</term><term>Rosenoer sheiham</term><term>Same methods</term><term>Same proportion</term><term>Same trend</term><term>Same variables</term><term>Satisfaction</term><term>Satisfaction levels</term><term>Sheiham</term><term>Sheiham table</term><term>Social classes</term><term>Sociodental indicators</term><term>Subgroup</term><term>Subjective measures</term><term>Subjective perception</term><term>Support zones</term><term>Total satisfaction</term><term>Wearer</term><term>Whole sample</term><term>Witter</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Anterior teeth</term><term>Baseline</term><term>Bjorn owall</term><term>Blackwell science</term><term>Brazilian</term><term>Brazilian studies</term><term>Carlsson</term><term>Clinical examinations</term><term>Community dentistry</term><term>Complete dentition</term><term>Decayed teeth</term><term>Dental</term><term>Dental arch</term><term>Dental arches</term><term>Dental condition</term><term>Dental conditions</term><term>Dental groups</term><term>Dental status</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Dentition</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture wearers</term><term>Direct relationship</term><term>Dmft</term><term>Dmft index</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Eichner</term><term>Eichner index</term><term>Elderly people</term><term>Elderly population</term><term>Elia</term><term>Functional units</term><term>High dmft</term><term>Higher percentage</term><term>Kayser</term><term>Leake</term><term>Lled</term><term>Lled teeth</term><term>Logistic model</term><term>Logistic regression model</term><term>Longitudinal</term><term>Longitudinal baseline</term><term>Longitudinal studies</term><term>Longitudinal study</term><term>Lower levels</term><term>Lower number</term><term>Lower numbers</term><term>Main hypothesis</term><term>Main purpose</term><term>Masticatory</term><term>Meeuwissen</term><term>Molar</term><term>Molar pairs</term><term>Molar teeth</term><term>Multiple regression</term><term>Natural teeth</term><term>Ndings</term><term>Occlusal</term><term>Occlusal stability</term><term>Open spaces</term><term>Oral comfort</term><term>Oral condition</term><term>Oral function</term><term>Oral health</term><term>Oral health status</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Oral status</term><term>Other studies</term><term>Owall</term><term>Owall taylor</term><term>Partial dentures</term><term>Pearson correlation</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontal disease</term><term>Periodontal pockets</term><term>Pilot study</term><term>Posterior</term><term>Posterior teeth</term><term>Premolar</term><term>Premolar pairs</term><term>Premolar pairs number</term><term>Premolar teeth</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Prosthetic treatment</term><term>Reisine</term><term>Reisine bailit</term><term>Removable</term><term>Rosenoer sheiham</term><term>Same methods</term><term>Same proportion</term><term>Same trend</term><term>Same variables</term><term>Satisfaction</term><term>Satisfaction levels</term><term>Sheiham</term><term>Sheiham table</term><term>Social classes</term><term>Sociodental indicators</term><term>Subgroup</term><term>Subjective measures</term><term>Subjective perception</term><term>Support zones</term><term>Total satisfaction</term><term>Wearer</term><term>Whole sample</term><term>Witter</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The objective of this study was to analyse adults’ subjective perception of satisfaction in relation to number, position and condition of natural teeth. Subjective perception of satisfaction was assessed by interview. Dental status was assessed. Two types of survey were carried out in Brazil: a longitudinal and a cross‐sectional survey. The longitudinal study commenced in 1990, with 227 dentate people aged 45–54 years, of two social classes. Of the 227 subjects examined in 1990, 126 were re‐examined and interviewed 3 years later. The cross‐sectional survey used the same methods used for the longitudinal study. Six hundred and fifty‐seven dentate males aged from 35 to 54 years were examined and interviewed. There was a positive correlation between satisfaction and position of teeth. Premolar pairs had a higher correlation with satisfaction in both studies. Anterior teeth were the most significant predictors of satisfaction. There was no difference in the percentage of satisfied persons between the baseline and follow‐up studies. The results indicate that adults with three premolar pairs and intact anterior sextants were satisfied with their oral status. Keeping a certain number of teeth, depending on their position and condition, gave more satisfaction than having the missing teeth replaced with partial dentures.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>premolar</json:string><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>molar pairs</json:string><json:string>molar</json:string><json:string>premolar pairs</json:string><json:string>kayser</json:string><json:string>oral rehabilitation</json:string><json:string>total satisfaction</json:string><json:string>longitudinal</json:string><json:string>molar teeth</json:string><json:string>longitudinal study</json:string><json:string>dental groups</json:string><json:string>sheiham</json:string><json:string>premolar teeth</json:string><json:string>posterior teeth</json:string><json:string>eichner</json:string><json:string>dentition</json:string><json:string>anterior teeth</json:string><json:string>blackwell science</json:string><json:string>brazilian studies</json:string><json:string>dmft</json:string><json:string>lled</json:string><json:string>longitudinal studies</json:string><json:string>eichner index</json:string><json:string>occlusal</json:string><json:string>lled teeth</json:string><json:string>meeuwissen</json:string><json:string>witter</json:string><json:string>dental arches</json:string><json:string>oral function</json:string><json:string>partial dentures</json:string><json:string>oral health</json:string><json:string>prosthetic</json:string><json:string>elia</json:string><json:string>reisine</json:string><json:string>periodontal</json:string><json:string>masticatory</json:string><json:string>carlsson</json:string><json:string>wearer</json:string><json:string>leake</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>dental condition</json:string><json:string>dmft index</json:string><json:string>owall</json:string><json:string>ndings</json:string><json:string>baseline</json:string><json:string>removable</json:string><json:string>direct relationship</json:string><json:string>oral status</json:string><json:string>subgroup</json:string><json:string>community dentistry</json:string><json:string>oral condition</json:string><json:string>prosthetic dentistry</json:string><json:string>other studies</json:string><json:string>dental status</json:string><json:string>subjective perception</json:string><json:string>natural teeth</json:string><json:string>decayed teeth</json:string><json:string>oral comfort</json:string><json:string>longitudinal baseline</json:string><json:string>denture wearers</json:string><json:string>reisine bailit</json:string><json:string>whole sample</json:string><json:string>multiple regression</json:string><json:string>dental conditions</json:string><json:string>dental arch</json:string><json:string>same trend</json:string><json:string>lower levels</json:string><json:string>pearson correlation</json:string><json:string>clinical examinations</json:string><json:string>satisfaction</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>dental</json:string><json:string>sociodental indicators</json:string><json:string>main hypothesis</json:string><json:string>sheiham table</json:string><json:string>logistic model</json:string><json:string>premolar pairs number</json:string><json:string>lower number</json:string><json:string>same methods</json:string><json:string>same variables</json:string><json:string>logistic regression model</json:string><json:string>periodontal disease</json:string><json:string>main purpose</json:string><json:string>same proportion</json:string><json:string>complete dentition</json:string><json:string>pilot study</json:string><json:string>elderly population</json:string><json:string>satisfaction levels</json:string><json:string>periodontal pockets</json:string><json:string>social classes</json:string><json:string>subjective measures</json:string><json:string>elderly people</json:string><json:string>occlusal stability</json:string><json:string>support zones</json:string><json:string>prosthetic treatment</json:string><json:string>open spaces</json:string><json:string>high dmft</json:string><json:string>bjorn owall</json:string><json:string>owall taylor</json:string><json:string>oral health status</json:string><json:string>rosenoer sheiham</json:string><json:string>higher percentage</json:string><json:string>functional units</json:string><json:string>lower numbers</json:string><json:string>brazilian</json:string><json:string>posterior</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>A. C. Elias</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Dental Public Health, University College London Medical School and St Bartholomew’s and The Royal London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, U.K.</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>A. Sheiham</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Dental Public Health, University College London Medical School and St Bartholomew’s and The Royal London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, U.K.</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>JOOR319</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-GML57KMD-J</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>The objective of this study was to analyse adults’ subjective perception of satisfaction in relation to number, position and condition of natural teeth. Subjective perception of satisfaction was assessed by interview. Dental status was assessed. Two types of survey were carried out in Brazil: a longitudinal and a cross‐sectional survey. The longitudinal study commenced in 1990, with 227 dentate people aged 45–54 years, of two social classes. Of the 227 subjects examined in 1990, 126 were re‐examined and interviewed 3 years later. The cross‐sectional survey used the same methods used for the longitudinal study. Six hundred and fifty‐seven dentate males aged from 35 to 54 years were examined and interviewed. There was a positive correlation between satisfaction and position of teeth. Premolar pairs had a higher correlation with satisfaction in both studies. Anterior teeth were the most significant predictors of satisfaction. There was no difference in the percentage of satisfied persons between the baseline and follow‐up studies. The results indicate that adults with three premolar pairs and intact anterior sextants were satisfied with their oral status. Keeping a certain number of teeth, depending on their position and condition, gave more satisfaction than having the missing teeth replaced with partial dentures.</abstract><qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>192</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1333</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>0</keywordCount><score>9.304</score><pdfWordCount>11021</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>68680</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.1</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>19</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>612 x 792 pts (letter)</pdfPageSize></qualityIndicators><title>The relationship between satisfaction with mouth and number, position and condition of teeth: studies in Brazilian adults</title><pmid><json:string>10080325</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0305-182X</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1365-2842</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JOOR</json:string></publisherId><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><pages><first>53</first><last>71</last><total>19</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>0, 3/0</json:string><json:string>4, 4/1</json:string><json:string>1993</json:string><json:string>1999</json:string><json:string>1990</json:string><json:string>1, 2/1</json:string><json:string>2, 4/0, 100 100 100</json:string><json:string>5, 4/6</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Blackwell Science Ltd</json:string><json:string>WHO</json:string><json:string>ABA/ABIPEME</json:string><json:string>World Health Organisation</json:string><json:string>Brazil and the British Council</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>The</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Brazil</json:string><json:string>Brasilia</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Witter et al., (1989)</json:string><json:string>Leake et al., 1994</json:string><json:string>Locker, 1988</json:string><json:string>Elias, 1996</json:string><json:string>Witter et al., 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990a,b, 1991</json:string><json:string>Giddon et al. (1976)</json:string><json:string>Kiyak & Mulligan, 1987</json:string><json:string>Witter et al., 1988</json:string><json:string>Leake, 1990</json:string><json:string>Gordon, Fryer & Niessen, 1988</json:string><json:string>Giddon et al., 1976</json:string><json:string>Schuurs et al., 1990</json:string><json:string>Rosenoer & Sheiham, 1995</json:string><json:string>Witter et al., 1994b</json:string><json:string>Owall & Taylor, 1989</json:string><json:string>Zarb et al., 1978</json:string><json:string>Ekelund, 1989</json:string><json:string>Matthias et al. (1995)</json:string><json:string>Tervonen, 1988</json:string><json:string>Imperiali et al., 1984</json:string><json:string>Locker (1992)</json:string><json:string>Van Waas et al., 1994</json:string><json:string>Heloe & Heloe, 1977</json:string><json:string>Witter et al., 1990b</json:string><json:string>Smith & Sheiham, 1980</json:string><json:string>Slade & Spencer, 1994</json:string><json:string>Witter et al.</json:string><json:string>Osterberg, Hedegard & Sater, 1983</json:string><json:string>Meeuwissen et al., 1995</json:string><json:string>Leake et al. (1994)</json:string><json:string>Bjorn & Owall, 1979</json:string><json:string>WHO, 1987</json:string><json:string>Witter et al. (1994a)</json:string><json:string>Reisine and Bailit 1980</json:string><json:string>Reisine et al., 1989</json:string><json:string>Chen (1991)</json:string><json:string>Oosterhaven et al., 1988</json:string><json:string>Morita et al., 1989</json:string><json:string>Watson et al., 1986</json:string><json:string>Witter et al., 1990a</json:string><json:string>Gunne, 1985</json:string><json:string>Tuominen, 1987</json:string><json:string>Eichner, 1955</json:string><json:string>Cohen & Jago, 1976</json:string><json:string>Meeuwissen, 1992</json:string><json:string>Kayser et al., 1987, 1988, 1990</json:string><json:string>Witter et al. (1990b)</json:string><json:string>Witter et al. (1994b)</json:string><json:string>Agerberg & Carlsson, 1981</json:string><json:string>Witter et al., 1991</json:string><json:string>Meeuwissen et al. (1995)</json:string><json:string>Aukes et al. (1988)</json:string><json:string>Barenthin, 1977</json:string><json:string>Matthias et al., 1995</json:string><json:string>Ettinger, 1987</json:string><json:string>Aukes et al., 1988</json:string><json:string>Sheiham, Maizels & Maizels, 1987</json:string><json:string>Gordon et al. (1988)</json:string><json:string>Imperiali et al. (1984)</json:string><json:string>Reisine & Bailit, 1980</json:string><json:string>Wayler & Chauncey, 1983</json:string><json:string>Chauncey et al. (1984)</json:string><json:string>Carlsson, 1984</json:string><json:string>Rosenoer and Sheiham (1995)</json:string><json:string>Witter et al., 1994a,b</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-GML57KMD-J</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>1999</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1999</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00319.x</json:string></doi><id>F0E610E981E9A4BA1495732566739D6EBF22B49B</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F0E610E981E9A4BA1495732566739D6EBF22B49B/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F0E610E981E9A4BA1495732566739D6EBF22B49B/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/F0E610E981E9A4BA1495732566739D6EBF22B49B/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">The relationship between satisfaction with mouth and number, position and condition of teeth: studies in Brazilian adults</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1999-01"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The relationship between satisfaction with mouth and number, position and condition of teeth: studies in Brazilian adults</title><title level="a" type="short">SATISFACTION WITH MOUTH BASED ON NUMBER, POSITION AND CONDITION</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">A. C.</forename><surname>Elias</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Dental Public Health, University College London Medical School and St Bartholomew’s and The Royal London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, U.K.</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">A.</forename><surname>Sheiham</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Dental Public Health, University College London Medical School and St Bartholomew’s and The Royal London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, U.K.</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">F0E610E981E9A4BA1495732566739D6EBF22B49B</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-GML57KMD-J</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00319.x</idno><idno type="unit">JOOR319</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JOOR.JOOR319.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title><idno type="pISSN">0305-182X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/jor.1999.26.issue-1</idno><idno type="product">JOOR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">26</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="53">53</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="71">71</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">19</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1999-01"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p>The objective of this study was to analyse adults’ subjective perception of satisfaction in relation to number, position and condition of natural teeth. Subjective perception of satisfaction was assessed by interview. Dental status was assessed. Two types of survey were carried out in Brazil: a longitudinal and a cross‐sectional survey. The longitudinal study commenced in 1990, with 227 dentate people aged 45–54 years, of two social classes. Of the 227 subjects examined in 1990, 126 were re‐examined and interviewed 3 years later. The cross‐sectional survey used the same methods used for the longitudinal study. Six hundred and fifty‐seven dentate males aged from 35 to 54 years were examined and interviewed. There was a positive correlation between satisfaction and position of teeth. Premolar pairs had a higher correlation with satisfaction in both studies. Anterior teeth were the most significant predictors of satisfaction. There was no difference in the percentage of satisfied persons between the baseline and follow‐up studies. The results indicate that adults with three premolar pairs and intact anterior sextants were satisfied with their oral status. Keeping a certain number of teeth, depending on their position and condition, gave more satisfaction than having the missing teeth replaced with partial dentures.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Article</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F0E610E981E9A4BA1495732566739D6EBF22B49B/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</doi><issn type="print">0305-182X</issn><issn type="electronic">1365-2842</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JOOR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="01001"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/jor.1999.26.issue-1</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="26">26</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="1">1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="1999-01">January 1999</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0005300" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00319.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JOOR319"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="19"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Article</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2001-12-25"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2001-12-25"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.4 mode:FullText source:Header result:Header" date="2010-03-29"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-20"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-30"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="53">53</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="71">71</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Professor Aubrey Sheiham, Dental Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London Medical School, 1–19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 6BT, U.K.</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JOOR.JOOR319.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="5"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="11"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="76"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="12285"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">The relationship between satisfaction with mouth and number, position and condition of teeth: studies in Brazilian adults</title><title type="shortAuthors">A.C. ELIAS & A. SHEIHAM</title><title type="short">SATISFACTION WITH MOUTH BASED ON NUMBER, POSITION AND CONDITION</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>A. C.</givenNames><familyName>Elias</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>A.</givenNames><familyName>Sheiham</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Dental Public Health, University College London Medical School and St Bartholomew’s and The Royal London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, U.K.</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>The objective of this study was to analyse adults’ subjective perception of satisfaction in relation to number, position and condition of natural teeth. Subjective perception of satisfaction was assessed by interview. Dental status was assessed. Two types of survey were carried out in Brazil: a longitudinal and a cross‐sectional survey. The longitudinal study commenced in 1990, with 227 dentate people aged 45–54 years, of two social classes. Of the 227 subjects examined in 1990, 126 were re‐examined and interviewed 3 years later. The cross‐sectional survey used the same methods used for the longitudinal study. Six hundred and fifty‐seven dentate males aged from 35 to 54 years were examined and interviewed. There was a positive correlation between satisfaction and position of teeth. Premolar pairs had a higher correlation with satisfaction in both studies. Anterior teeth were the most significant predictors of satisfaction. There was no difference in the percentage of satisfied persons between the baseline and follow‐up studies. The results indicate that adults with three premolar pairs and intact anterior sextants were satisfied with their oral status. Keeping a certain number of teeth, depending on their position and condition, gave more satisfaction than having the missing teeth replaced with partial dentures.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>The relationship between satisfaction with mouth and number, position and condition of teeth: studies in Brazilian adults</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>SATISFACTION WITH MOUTH BASED ON NUMBER, POSITION AND CONDITION</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>The relationship between satisfaction with mouth and number, position and condition of teeth: studies in Brazilian adults</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">A. C.</namePart><namePart type="family">Elias</namePart><affiliation>Department of Dental Public Health, University College London Medical School and St Bartholomew’s and The Royal London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, U.K.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">A.</namePart><namePart type="family">Sheiham</namePart><affiliation>Department of Dental Public Health, University College London Medical School and St Bartholomew’s and The Royal London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, U.K.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1999-01</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1999</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">5</extent><extent unit="tables">11</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">76</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent><extent unit="words">12285</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">The objective of this study was to analyse adults’ subjective perception of satisfaction in relation to number, position and condition of natural teeth. Subjective perception of satisfaction was assessed by interview. Dental status was assessed. Two types of survey were carried out in Brazil: a longitudinal and a cross‐sectional survey. The longitudinal study commenced in 1990, with 227 dentate people aged 45–54 years, of two social classes. Of the 227 subjects examined in 1990, 126 were re‐examined and interviewed 3 years later. The cross‐sectional survey used the same methods used for the longitudinal study. Six hundred and fifty‐seven dentate males aged from 35 to 54 years were examined and interviewed. There was a positive correlation between satisfaction and position of teeth. Premolar pairs had a higher correlation with satisfaction in both studies. Anterior teeth were the most significant predictors of satisfaction. There was no difference in the percentage of satisfied persons between the baseline and follow‐up studies. The results indicate that adults with three premolar pairs and intact anterior sextants were satisfied with their oral status. Keeping a certain number of teeth, depending on their position and condition, gave more satisfaction than having the missing teeth replaced with partial dentures.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0305-182X</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1365-2842</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JOOR</identifier><part><date>1999</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>26</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>53</start><end>71</end><total>19</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">F0E610E981E9A4BA1495732566739D6EBF22B49B</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-GML57KMD-J</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00319.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JOOR319</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Science Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F0E610E981E9A4BA1495732566739D6EBF22B49B/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 007744 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 007744 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:F0E610E981E9A4BA1495732566739D6EBF22B49B
|texte= The relationship between satisfaction with mouth and number, position and condition of teeth: studies in Brazilian adults
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |