Application of Ostrom’s Principles for Sustainable Governance of Common‐Pool Resources to Near‐Earth Orbit
Identifieur interne : 007637 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 007636; suivant : 007638Application of Ostrom’s Principles for Sustainable Governance of Common‐Pool Resources to Near‐Earth Orbit
Auteurs : Joan Johnson-Freese ; Brian WeedenSource :
- Global Policy [ 1758-5880 ] ; 2012-02.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Active satellites, Additional work, American security, Appropriator, Assembly resolution, Atlantic treaty organization, Atmosphere ends, Binding agreement, Brian weeden, Certain states, Commercial entities, Common heritage, Commons, Commons report, Consensus basis, Consensus nature, Copuos, Cpr, Design principles, Earth orbit, Electromagnetic, Electromagnetic interference, Electromagnetic spectrum, Elinor ostrom, Enforcement mechanisms, European space agency, European union, First committee, Formal treaty, Global, Global commons, Global commons initiative, Global policy, Global resource, Governance, Governance mechanisms, Governance regime, International organization, January, John wiley sons, Larger scale, Legal subcommittee, Local conditions, Local level, London school, Many resource appropriators, Many states, Member states, Military power, Monitoring system, Moon treaty, Multiple success stories, National research council, Nations committee, Nongovernmental entities, Nongovernmental organizations, Nonstate, Nonstate actors, Nonstate participation, Online, Operational rules, Ostrom, Other states, Outer space, Outer space affairs, Outer space treaty, Permanent observers, Political science, Provision problems, Resource, Resource appropriators, Resource system, Resource units, Satellite, Satellites orbit, Second tier, Social sciences, Soviet union, Space activities, Space actors, Space assets, Space capabilities, Space data association, Space debris, Space debris mitigation guidelines, Space domain, Space environment, Space governance, Space governance mechanisms, Space review, Space situational awareness, Space users, Spacefaring states, State practice, Success stories, Sustainability, Sustainable, Sustainable commons, Sustainable manner, Third tier, Tractable models, Vast majority, Weeden, White house, World foundation.
- Teeft :
- Active satellites, Additional work, American security, Appropriator, Assembly resolution, Atlantic treaty organization, Atmosphere ends, Binding agreement, Brian weeden, Certain states, Commercial entities, Common heritage, Commons, Commons report, Consensus basis, Consensus nature, Copuos, Cpr, Design principles, Earth orbit, Electromagnetic, Electromagnetic interference, Electromagnetic spectrum, Elinor ostrom, Enforcement mechanisms, European space agency, European union, First committee, Formal treaty, Global, Global commons, Global commons initiative, Global policy, Global resource, Governance, Governance mechanisms, Governance regime, International organization, January, John wiley sons, Larger scale, Legal subcommittee, Local conditions, Local level, London school, Many resource appropriators, Many states, Member states, Military power, Monitoring system, Moon treaty, Multiple success stories, National research council, Nations committee, Nongovernmental entities, Nongovernmental organizations, Nonstate, Nonstate actors, Nonstate participation, Online, Operational rules, Ostrom, Other states, Outer space, Outer space affairs, Outer space treaty, Permanent observers, Political science, Provision problems, Resource, Resource appropriators, Resource system, Resource units, Satellite, Satellites orbit, Second tier, Social sciences, Soviet union, Space activities, Space actors, Space assets, Space capabilities, Space data association, Space debris, Space debris mitigation guidelines, Space domain, Space environment, Space governance, Space governance mechanisms, Space review, Space situational awareness, Space users, Spacefaring states, State practice, Success stories, Sustainability, Sustainable, Sustainable commons, Sustainable manner, Third tier, Tractable models, Vast majority, Weeden, White house, World foundation.
Abstract
Near‐Earth orbit is a key global resource, hosting assets critical to governments, militaries and commercial entities and providing services for global communications, remote sensing, national and international security, and accurate positioning and timing. It is also an increasingly crowded, congested and contested environment, at risk from both intentional and unintentional activities and events, and threats natural and human‐made. Ensuring the long‐term sustainability of the space environment is an increasingly recognized need by all users of space. This article considers the viability of principles regarding sustainable common‐pool resources (CPRs) established by Elinor Ostrom for space governance. In this initial consideration, we focus specifically on the issues of boundaries, collective choice arrangements and monitoring. Within those contexts, Ostrom’s principles appear most useful for identifying gaps in the current space governance system and mechanisms. Further, while Ostrom provides multiple success stories for her model, they typically include common‐pool regimes functioning at a local level, with success stories on a larger scale elusive. Near‐Earth orbit is perhaps the largest‐scale CPR to consider. Consequently, not only is additional work needed to relate Ostrom’s model specifically to space, but to determine the limits of applicability of Ostrom’s model and other models that should be considered.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1758-5899.2011.00109.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:EEB6C2928923A2611C48EE806D2DB024A7FA2E5DLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Application of Ostrom’s Principles for Sustainable Governance of Common‐Pool Resources to Near‐Earth Orbit</title>
<author><name sortKey="Johnson Reese, Joan" sort="Johnson Reese, Joan" uniqKey="Johnson Reese J" first="Joan" last="Johnson-Freese">Joan Johnson-Freese</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Naval War College, USA</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Weeden, Brian" sort="Weeden, Brian" uniqKey="Weeden B" first="Brian" last="Weeden">Brian Weeden</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Secure World Foundation, USA</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:EEB6C2928923A2611C48EE806D2DB024A7FA2E5D</idno>
<date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1758-5899.2011.00109.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/EEB6C2928923A2611C48EE806D2DB024A7FA2E5D/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">007637</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">007637</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Application of Ostrom’s Principles for Sustainable Governance of Common‐Pool Resources to Near‐Earth Orbit</title>
<author><name sortKey="Johnson Reese, Joan" sort="Johnson Reese, Joan" uniqKey="Johnson Reese J" first="Joan" last="Johnson-Freese">Joan Johnson-Freese</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Naval War College, USA</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Weeden, Brian" sort="Weeden, Brian" uniqKey="Weeden B" first="Brian" last="Weeden">Brian Weeden</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Secure World Foundation, USA</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Global Policy</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">GLOBAL POLICY</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1758-5880</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1758-5899</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">3</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="72">72</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="81">81</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">10</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2012-02">2012-02</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">1758-5880</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1758-5880</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Active satellites</term>
<term>Additional work</term>
<term>American security</term>
<term>Appropriator</term>
<term>Assembly resolution</term>
<term>Atlantic treaty organization</term>
<term>Atmosphere ends</term>
<term>Binding agreement</term>
<term>Brian weeden</term>
<term>Certain states</term>
<term>Commercial entities</term>
<term>Common heritage</term>
<term>Commons</term>
<term>Commons report</term>
<term>Consensus basis</term>
<term>Consensus nature</term>
<term>Copuos</term>
<term>Cpr</term>
<term>Design principles</term>
<term>Earth orbit</term>
<term>Electromagnetic</term>
<term>Electromagnetic interference</term>
<term>Electromagnetic spectrum</term>
<term>Elinor ostrom</term>
<term>Enforcement mechanisms</term>
<term>European space agency</term>
<term>European union</term>
<term>First committee</term>
<term>Formal treaty</term>
<term>Global</term>
<term>Global commons</term>
<term>Global commons initiative</term>
<term>Global policy</term>
<term>Global resource</term>
<term>Governance</term>
<term>Governance mechanisms</term>
<term>Governance regime</term>
<term>International organization</term>
<term>January</term>
<term>John wiley sons</term>
<term>Larger scale</term>
<term>Legal subcommittee</term>
<term>Local conditions</term>
<term>Local level</term>
<term>London school</term>
<term>Many resource appropriators</term>
<term>Many states</term>
<term>Member states</term>
<term>Military power</term>
<term>Monitoring system</term>
<term>Moon treaty</term>
<term>Multiple success stories</term>
<term>National research council</term>
<term>Nations committee</term>
<term>Nongovernmental entities</term>
<term>Nongovernmental organizations</term>
<term>Nonstate</term>
<term>Nonstate actors</term>
<term>Nonstate participation</term>
<term>Online</term>
<term>Operational rules</term>
<term>Ostrom</term>
<term>Other states</term>
<term>Outer space</term>
<term>Outer space affairs</term>
<term>Outer space treaty</term>
<term>Permanent observers</term>
<term>Political science</term>
<term>Provision problems</term>
<term>Resource</term>
<term>Resource appropriators</term>
<term>Resource system</term>
<term>Resource units</term>
<term>Satellite</term>
<term>Satellites orbit</term>
<term>Second tier</term>
<term>Social sciences</term>
<term>Soviet union</term>
<term>Space activities</term>
<term>Space actors</term>
<term>Space assets</term>
<term>Space capabilities</term>
<term>Space data association</term>
<term>Space debris</term>
<term>Space debris mitigation guidelines</term>
<term>Space domain</term>
<term>Space environment</term>
<term>Space governance</term>
<term>Space governance mechanisms</term>
<term>Space review</term>
<term>Space situational awareness</term>
<term>Space users</term>
<term>Spacefaring states</term>
<term>State practice</term>
<term>Success stories</term>
<term>Sustainability</term>
<term>Sustainable</term>
<term>Sustainable commons</term>
<term>Sustainable manner</term>
<term>Third tier</term>
<term>Tractable models</term>
<term>Vast majority</term>
<term>Weeden</term>
<term>White house</term>
<term>World foundation</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Active satellites</term>
<term>Additional work</term>
<term>American security</term>
<term>Appropriator</term>
<term>Assembly resolution</term>
<term>Atlantic treaty organization</term>
<term>Atmosphere ends</term>
<term>Binding agreement</term>
<term>Brian weeden</term>
<term>Certain states</term>
<term>Commercial entities</term>
<term>Common heritage</term>
<term>Commons</term>
<term>Commons report</term>
<term>Consensus basis</term>
<term>Consensus nature</term>
<term>Copuos</term>
<term>Cpr</term>
<term>Design principles</term>
<term>Earth orbit</term>
<term>Electromagnetic</term>
<term>Electromagnetic interference</term>
<term>Electromagnetic spectrum</term>
<term>Elinor ostrom</term>
<term>Enforcement mechanisms</term>
<term>European space agency</term>
<term>European union</term>
<term>First committee</term>
<term>Formal treaty</term>
<term>Global</term>
<term>Global commons</term>
<term>Global commons initiative</term>
<term>Global policy</term>
<term>Global resource</term>
<term>Governance</term>
<term>Governance mechanisms</term>
<term>Governance regime</term>
<term>International organization</term>
<term>January</term>
<term>John wiley sons</term>
<term>Larger scale</term>
<term>Legal subcommittee</term>
<term>Local conditions</term>
<term>Local level</term>
<term>London school</term>
<term>Many resource appropriators</term>
<term>Many states</term>
<term>Member states</term>
<term>Military power</term>
<term>Monitoring system</term>
<term>Moon treaty</term>
<term>Multiple success stories</term>
<term>National research council</term>
<term>Nations committee</term>
<term>Nongovernmental entities</term>
<term>Nongovernmental organizations</term>
<term>Nonstate</term>
<term>Nonstate actors</term>
<term>Nonstate participation</term>
<term>Online</term>
<term>Operational rules</term>
<term>Ostrom</term>
<term>Other states</term>
<term>Outer space</term>
<term>Outer space affairs</term>
<term>Outer space treaty</term>
<term>Permanent observers</term>
<term>Political science</term>
<term>Provision problems</term>
<term>Resource</term>
<term>Resource appropriators</term>
<term>Resource system</term>
<term>Resource units</term>
<term>Satellite</term>
<term>Satellites orbit</term>
<term>Second tier</term>
<term>Social sciences</term>
<term>Soviet union</term>
<term>Space activities</term>
<term>Space actors</term>
<term>Space assets</term>
<term>Space capabilities</term>
<term>Space data association</term>
<term>Space debris</term>
<term>Space debris mitigation guidelines</term>
<term>Space domain</term>
<term>Space environment</term>
<term>Space governance</term>
<term>Space governance mechanisms</term>
<term>Space review</term>
<term>Space situational awareness</term>
<term>Space users</term>
<term>Spacefaring states</term>
<term>State practice</term>
<term>Success stories</term>
<term>Sustainability</term>
<term>Sustainable</term>
<term>Sustainable commons</term>
<term>Sustainable manner</term>
<term>Third tier</term>
<term>Tractable models</term>
<term>Vast majority</term>
<term>Weeden</term>
<term>White house</term>
<term>World foundation</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract">Near‐Earth orbit is a key global resource, hosting assets critical to governments, militaries and commercial entities and providing services for global communications, remote sensing, national and international security, and accurate positioning and timing. It is also an increasingly crowded, congested and contested environment, at risk from both intentional and unintentional activities and events, and threats natural and human‐made. Ensuring the long‐term sustainability of the space environment is an increasingly recognized need by all users of space. This article considers the viability of principles regarding sustainable common‐pool resources (CPRs) established by Elinor Ostrom for space governance. In this initial consideration, we focus specifically on the issues of boundaries, collective choice arrangements and monitoring. Within those contexts, Ostrom’s principles appear most useful for identifying gaps in the current space governance system and mechanisms. Further, while Ostrom provides multiple success stories for her model, they typically include common‐pool regimes functioning at a local level, with success stories on a larger scale elusive. Near‐Earth orbit is perhaps the largest‐scale CPR to consider. Consequently, not only is additional work needed to relate Ostrom’s model specifically to space, but to determine the limits of applicability of Ostrom’s model and other models that should be considered.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName>
<keywords><teeft><json:string>governance</json:string>
<json:string>appropriator</json:string>
<json:string>ostrom</json:string>
<json:string>online</json:string>
<json:string>january</json:string>
<json:string>outer space</json:string>
<json:string>resource appropriators</json:string>
<json:string>copuos</json:string>
<json:string>weeden</json:string>
<json:string>global commons</json:string>
<json:string>sustainable</json:string>
<json:string>sustainability</json:string>
<json:string>john wiley sons</json:string>
<json:string>political science</json:string>
<json:string>london school</json:string>
<json:string>global policy</json:string>
<json:string>cpr</json:string>
<json:string>space actors</json:string>
<json:string>resource units</json:string>
<json:string>space governance</json:string>
<json:string>nonstate</json:string>
<json:string>electromagnetic</json:string>
<json:string>space activities</json:string>
<json:string>assembly resolution</json:string>
<json:string>sustainable commons</json:string>
<json:string>brian weeden</json:string>
<json:string>space environment</json:string>
<json:string>resource system</json:string>
<json:string>global</json:string>
<json:string>commons</json:string>
<json:string>space assets</json:string>
<json:string>many states</json:string>
<json:string>space situational awareness</json:string>
<json:string>commercial entities</json:string>
<json:string>nonstate actors</json:string>
<json:string>space domain</json:string>
<json:string>soviet union</json:string>
<json:string>space debris</json:string>
<json:string>outer space treaty</json:string>
<json:string>space users</json:string>
<json:string>operational rules</json:string>
<json:string>member states</json:string>
<json:string>european union</json:string>
<json:string>space data association</json:string>
<json:string>electromagnetic interference</json:string>
<json:string>spacefaring states</json:string>
<json:string>resource</json:string>
<json:string>provision problems</json:string>
<json:string>governance regime</json:string>
<json:string>active satellites</json:string>
<json:string>electromagnetic spectrum</json:string>
<json:string>additional work</json:string>
<json:string>social sciences</json:string>
<json:string>atlantic treaty organization</json:string>
<json:string>global commons initiative</json:string>
<json:string>common heritage</json:string>
<json:string>moon treaty</json:string>
<json:string>sustainable manner</json:string>
<json:string>space governance mechanisms</json:string>
<json:string>certain states</json:string>
<json:string>space review</json:string>
<json:string>atmosphere ends</json:string>
<json:string>legal subcommittee</json:string>
<json:string>nations committee</json:string>
<json:string>world foundation</json:string>
<json:string>state practice</json:string>
<json:string>vast majority</json:string>
<json:string>elinor ostrom</json:string>
<json:string>commons report</json:string>
<json:string>american security</json:string>
<json:string>outer space affairs</json:string>
<json:string>satellites orbit</json:string>
<json:string>design principles</json:string>
<json:string>space capabilities</json:string>
<json:string>second tier</json:string>
<json:string>tractable models</json:string>
<json:string>third tier</json:string>
<json:string>other states</json:string>
<json:string>nongovernmental entities</json:string>
<json:string>global resource</json:string>
<json:string>first committee</json:string>
<json:string>consensus nature</json:string>
<json:string>multiple success stories</json:string>
<json:string>permanent observers</json:string>
<json:string>nonstate participation</json:string>
<json:string>nongovernmental organizations</json:string>
<json:string>consensus basis</json:string>
<json:string>formal treaty</json:string>
<json:string>local level</json:string>
<json:string>binding agreement</json:string>
<json:string>white house</json:string>
<json:string>many resource appropriators</json:string>
<json:string>space debris mitigation guidelines</json:string>
<json:string>enforcement mechanisms</json:string>
<json:string>governance mechanisms</json:string>
<json:string>european space agency</json:string>
<json:string>monitoring system</json:string>
<json:string>international organization</json:string>
<json:string>military power</json:string>
<json:string>local conditions</json:string>
<json:string>success stories</json:string>
<json:string>earth orbit</json:string>
<json:string>larger scale</json:string>
<json:string>national research council</json:string>
<json:string>satellite</json:string>
</teeft>
</keywords>
<author><json:item><name>Joan Johnson‐Freese</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Naval War College, USA</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item><name>Brian Weeden</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Secure World Foundation, USA</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
</author>
<articleId><json:string>GPOL109</json:string>
</articleId>
<arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-QJ579PFH-9</arkIstex>
<language><json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string>
</originalGenre>
<abstract>Near‐Earth orbit is a key global resource, hosting assets critical to governments, militaries and commercial entities and providing services for global communications, remote sensing, national and international security, and accurate positioning and timing. It is also an increasingly crowded, congested and contested environment, at risk from both intentional and unintentional activities and events, and threats natural and human‐made. Ensuring the long‐term sustainability of the space environment is an increasingly recognized need by all users of space. This article considers the viability of principles regarding sustainable common‐pool resources (CPRs) established by Elinor Ostrom for space governance. In this initial consideration, we focus specifically on the issues of boundaries, collective choice arrangements and monitoring. Within those contexts, Ostrom’s principles appear most useful for identifying gaps in the current space governance system and mechanisms. Further, while Ostrom provides multiple success stories for her model, they typically include common‐pool regimes functioning at a local level, with success stories on a larger scale elusive. Near‐Earth orbit is perhaps the largest‐scale CPR to consider. Consequently, not only is additional work needed to relate Ostrom’s model specifically to space, but to determine the limits of applicability of Ostrom’s model and other models that should be considered.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative>
<abstractWordCount>199</abstractWordCount>
<abstractCharCount>1437</abstractCharCount>
<keywordCount>0</keywordCount>
<score>9.388</score>
<pdfWordCount>7740</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>48850</pdfCharCount>
<pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageCount>10</pdfPageCount>
<pdfPageSize>566.93 x 741.26 pts</pdfPageSize>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>Application of Ostrom’s Principles for Sustainable Governance of Common‐Pool Resources to Near‐Earth Orbit</title>
<genre><json:string>article</json:string>
</genre>
<host><title>Global Policy</title>
<language><json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1758-5899</json:string>
</doi>
<issn><json:string>1758-5880</json:string>
</issn>
<eissn><json:string>1758-5899</json:string>
</eissn>
<publisherId><json:string>GPOL</json:string>
</publisherId>
<volume>3</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<pages><first>72</first>
<last>81</last>
<total>10</total>
</pages>
<genre><json:string>journal</json:string>
</genre>
<subject><json:item><value>Special Section: Research Article</value>
</json:item>
</subject>
</host>
<namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1963</json:string>
<json:string>1957</json:string>
<json:string>1865</json:string>
<json:string>2012</json:string>
<json:string>1960s</json:string>
<json:string>1959</json:string>
<json:string>1970s</json:string>
<json:string>1955</json:string>
<json:string>2010</json:string>
<json:string>1967</json:string>
</date>
<geogName></geogName>
<orgName><json:string>US State Department</json:string>
<json:string>United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space</json:string>
<json:string>Sons Ltd.</json:string>
<json:string>Space Data Association</json:string>
<json:string>Japan, India, Israel and Iran</json:string>
<json:string>United States and the Soviet Union</json:string>
<json:string>Brian Weeden Secure World Foundation, USA Abstract Near-Earth</json:string>
<json:string>National Research Council</json:string>
<json:string>United States, Russia, France</json:string>
<json:string>White House</json:string>
<json:string>United Nations</json:string>
<json:string>US National Space Policy</json:string>
<json:string>European Space Agency</json:string>
<json:string>Department of Defense</json:string>
<json:string>Russia and China</json:string>
<json:string>United States, and the Warsaw Pact</json:string>
<json:string>Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland</json:string>
<json:string>Union of Concerned Scientists</json:string>
<json:string>North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)</json:string>
<json:string>National Security Space Strategy</json:string>
<json:string>New American Security</json:string>
<json:string>ESA</json:string>
<json:string>US Undersecretary of Defense Michele Flournoy</json:string>
</orgName>
<orgName_funder></orgName_funder>
<orgName_provider></orgName_provider>
<persName><json:string>Subcommittee</json:string>
<json:string>Brian Weeden</json:string>
<json:string>Dr Peter</json:string>
<json:string>John Wiley</json:string>
<json:string>Col</json:string>
<json:string>Commons</json:string>
<json:string>London School</json:string>
<json:string>Phillip Meek</json:string>
<json:string>Observers</json:string>
<json:string>The</json:string>
<json:string>Joan Johnson-Freese</json:string>
<json:string>Political Science</json:string>
<json:string>Henry Hertzfeld</json:string>
<json:string>Dwight Eisenhower</json:string>
<json:string>Theodore von Karman</json:string>
</persName>
<placeName><json:string>United States</json:string>
<json:string>European Union</json:string>
<json:string>Russia</json:string>
</placeName>
<ref_url><json:string>http://www.reachingcriticalwill.org/legal/paros/parosindex.html</json:string>
</ref_url>
<ref_bibl><json:string>White House, 2010</json:string>
<json:string>Union of Concerned Scientists, 2011</json:string>
<json:string>Ostrom, 1998, p. 49</json:string>
<json:string>Ostrom, 1998, p. 214</json:string>
<json:string>United Nations, 1967</json:string>
<json:string>Shaughnessy et al., 2010, p. 32</json:string>
<json:string>Grego and Wright, 2010</json:string>
<json:string>Weeden et al., 2010</json:string>
<json:string>Ostrom, 1998, p. 48</json:string>
<json:string>United Nations, 1966</json:string>
<json:string>Denmark and Mulvenon, 2010, p. 111</json:string>
<json:string>Department of Defense, 2011</json:string>
<json:string>United Nations, 1971</json:string>
<json:string>Denmark and Mulvenon, 2010, p. 11</json:string>
<json:string>Pratap, 2009</json:string>
<json:string>Weeden and Baseley-Walker, 2010</json:string>
<json:string>Space Data Association, 2010</json:string>
<json:string>NATO, 2010</json:string>
<json:string>De Selding, 2010</json:string>
<json:string>Ostrom, 1998</json:string>
<json:string>United Nations, 2011</json:string>
<json:string>Tennen, 2010, p. 213</json:string>
<json:string>Stout, 2010</json:string>
<json:string>European Space Agency, 2010</json:string>
<json:string>Weeden, 2010</json:string>
<json:string>Ostrom, 1998, p. 95</json:string>
<json:string>United Nations, 1974</json:string>
<json:string>Weeden, 2009</json:string>
<json:string>Lint, 2010</json:string>
<json:string>United Nations, 1979</json:string>
<json:string>Wright, 2009</json:string>
</ref_bibl>
<bibl></bibl>
</unitex>
</namedEntities>
<ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-QJ579PFH-9</json:string>
</ark>
<categories><wos><json:string>1 - social science</json:string>
<json:string>2 - political science</json:string>
<json:string>2 - international relations</json:string>
</wos>
<scienceMetrix></scienceMetrix>
<scopus><json:string>1 - Social Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Social Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>3 - Law</json:string>
<json:string>1 - Physical Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Environmental Science</json:string>
<json:string>3 - Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law</json:string>
<json:string>1 - Social Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Social Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>3 - Political Science and International Relations</json:string>
<json:string>1 - Social Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Economics, Econometrics and Finance</json:string>
<json:string>3 - Economics and Econometrics</json:string>
<json:string>1 - Physical Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Environmental Science</json:string>
<json:string>3 - Global and Planetary Change</json:string>
</scopus>
</categories>
<publicationDate>2012</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>2012</copyrightDate>
<doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1758-5899.2011.00109.x</json:string>
</doi>
<id>EEB6C2928923A2611C48EE806D2DB024A7FA2E5D</id>
<score>1</score>
<fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension>
<original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/EEB6C2928923A2611C48EE806D2DB024A7FA2E5D/fulltext/pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item><extension>zip</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/EEB6C2928923A2611C48EE806D2DB024A7FA2E5D/fulltext/zip</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/EEB6C2928923A2611C48EE806D2DB024A7FA2E5D/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Application of Ostrom’s Principles for Sustainable Governance of Common‐Pool Resources to Near‐Earth Orbit</title>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<availability><licence>© 2012 London School of Economics and Political Science and John Wiley & Sons Ltd</licence>
</availability>
<date type="published" when="2012-02"></date>
</publicationStmt>
<notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note>
<note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note>
</notesStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Application of Ostrom’s Principles for Sustainable Governance of Common‐Pool Resources to Near‐Earth Orbit</title>
<title level="a" type="short">Space as a Sustainable Commons?</title>
<author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Joan</forename>
<surname>Johnson‐Freese</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Naval War College, USA
Secure World Foundation, USA<address><country key="US US"></country>
</address>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>Naval War College, USA
<address><country key="US"></country>
</address>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Brian</forename>
<surname>Weeden</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Naval War College, USA
Secure World Foundation, USA<address><country key="US US"></country>
</address>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>Secure World Foundation, USA<address><country key="US"></country>
</address>
</affiliation>
</author>
<idno type="istex">EEB6C2928923A2611C48EE806D2DB024A7FA2E5D</idno>
<idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-QJ579PFH-9</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1758-5899.2011.00109.x</idno>
<idno type="unit">GPOL109</idno>
<idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:GPOL.GPOL109.pdf</idno>
</analytic>
<monogr><title level="j" type="main">Global Policy</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">GLOBAL POLICY</title>
<idno type="pISSN">1758-5880</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1758-5899</idno>
<idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1758-5899</idno>
<idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/gpol.2012.3.issue-1</idno>
<idno type="product">GPOL</idno>
<idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">3</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="72">72</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="81">81</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">10</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2012-02"></date>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main">
Abstract
<p>Near‐Earth orbit is a key global resource, hosting assets critical to governments, militaries and commercial entities and providing services for global communications, remote sensing, national and international security, and accurate positioning and timing. It is also an increasingly crowded, congested and contested environment, at risk from both intentional and unintentional activities and events, and threats natural and human‐made. Ensuring the long‐term sustainability of the space environment is an increasingly recognized need by all users of space. This article considers the viability of principles regarding sustainable common‐pool resources (CPRs) established by Elinor Ostrom for space governance. In this initial consideration, we focus specifically on the issues of boundaries, collective choice arrangements and monitoring. Within those contexts, Ostrom’s principles appear most useful for identifying gaps in the current space governance system and mechanisms. Further, while Ostrom provides multiple success stories for her model, they typically include common‐pool regimes functioning at a local level, with success stories on a larger scale elusive. Near‐Earth orbit is perhaps the largest‐scale CPR to consider. Consequently, not only is additional work needed to relate Ostrom’s model specifically to space, but to determine the limits of applicability of Ostrom’s model and other models that should be considered.</p>
Policy Implications
<p><list xml:id="l1" style="custom"><item n="•"><p> The global commons of outer space, particularly the region where satellites orbit around the Earth, faces a collective action problem of how to ensure the long‐term sustainability of space activities.</p>
</item>
<item n="•"><p> The current governance mechanisms for outer space activities were largely developed during the cold war, and are not sufficient to deal with the collective action problems stemming from the growing number of space actors and users.</p>
</item>
<item n="•"><p> Space actors exist with varying levels of capabilities, which complicates defining resource appropriator rights and responsibilities.</p>
</item>
<item n="•"><p> Common agreement is needed among space actors on the bounds of the space domain to allow resource appropriators to set the governance limitations, who has the right to make use of it and what governance regime applies.</p>
</item>
<item n="•"><p> Existing institutions for debating, creating and modifying space governance regimes fall short of the requirement that most actors affected by the rules can participate in their creation.</p>
</item>
<item n="•"><p> Space situational awareness will play a crucial role in monitoring the status of the space commons, adherence to rules and norms, and creating transparency and confidence among space actors.</p>
</item>
</list>
</p>
</abstract>
<textClass><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Special Section ‐ The Governance of the Global Commons</term>
</keywords>
<keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>Special Section: Research Article</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en"></language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
<json:item><extension>txt</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/EEB6C2928923A2611C48EE806D2DB024A7FA2E5D/fulltext/txt</uri>
</json:item>
</fulltext>
<metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName>
<publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc>
</publisherInfo>
<doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1758-5899</doi>
<issn type="print">1758-5880</issn>
<issn type="electronic">1758-5899</issn>
<idGroup><id type="product" value="GPOL"></id>
<id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id>
</idGroup>
<titleGroup><title type="main" sort="GLOBAL POLICY">Global Policy</title>
</titleGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="part" position="02101"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/gpol.2012.3.issue-1</doi>
<numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="3">3</numbering>
<numbering type="journalIssue" number="1">1</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<coverDate startDate="2012-02">February 2012</coverDate>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="8" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1758-5899.2011.00109.x</doi>
<idGroup><id type="unit" value="GPOL109"></id>
</idGroup>
<countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="10"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Special Section ‐ The Governance of the Global Commons</title>
<title type="articleCategory">Special Section: Research Article</title>
</titleGroup>
<copyright>© 2012 London School of Economics and Political Science and John Wiley & Sons Ltd</copyright>
<eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:3.0.1 mode:FullText" date="2012-01-27"></event>
<event type="firstOnline" date="2012-01-27"></event>
<event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2012-01-27"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-26"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.3.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-02-25"></event>
</eventGroup>
<numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="72">72</numbering>
<numbering type="pageLast" number="81">81</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:GPOL.GPOL109.pdf"></link>
</linkGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count>
<count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup><title type="main">Application of Ostrom’s Principles for Sustainable Governance of Common‐Pool Resources to Near‐Earth Orbit</title>
<title type="shortAuthors">Joan Johnson‐Freese and Brian Weeden</title>
<title type="short">Space as a Sustainable Commons?</title>
</titleGroup>
<creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1"><personName><givenNames>Joan</givenNames>
<familyName>Johnson‐Freese</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2"><personName><givenNames>Brian</givenNames>
<familyName>Weeden</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
</creators>
<affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="aff-1-1" countryCode="US"><unparsedAffiliation>Naval War College, USA
</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation xml:id="aff-1-2" countryCode="US"><unparsedAffiliation>Secure World Foundation, USA</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
</affiliationGroup>
<abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><section xml:id="abs1-1"><title type="main">Abstract</title>
<p>Near‐Earth orbit is a key global resource, hosting assets critical to governments, militaries and commercial entities and providing services for global communications, remote sensing, national and international security, and accurate positioning and timing. It is also an increasingly crowded, congested and contested environment, at risk from both intentional and unintentional activities and events, and threats natural and human‐made. Ensuring the long‐term sustainability of the space environment is an increasingly recognized need by all users of space. This article considers the viability of principles regarding sustainable common‐pool resources (CPRs) established by Elinor Ostrom for space governance. In this initial consideration, we focus specifically on the issues of boundaries, collective choice arrangements and monitoring. Within those contexts, Ostrom’s principles appear most useful for identifying gaps in the current space governance system and mechanisms. Further, while Ostrom provides multiple success stories for her model, they typically include common‐pool regimes functioning at a local level, with success stories on a larger scale elusive. Near‐Earth orbit is perhaps the largest‐scale CPR to consider. Consequently, not only is additional work needed to relate Ostrom’s model specifically to space, but to determine the limits of applicability of Ostrom’s model and other models that should be considered.</p>
</section>
<section xml:id="abs1-2"><title type="main">Policy Implications</title>
<p><list xml:id="l1" style="custom"><listItem><label>•</label>
<p> The global commons of outer space, particularly the region where satellites orbit around the Earth, faces a collective action problem of how to ensure the long‐term sustainability of space activities.</p>
</listItem>
<listItem><label>•</label>
<p> The current governance mechanisms for outer space activities were largely developed during the cold war, and are not sufficient to deal with the collective action problems stemming from the growing number of space actors and users.</p>
</listItem>
<listItem><label>•</label>
<p> Space actors exist with varying levels of capabilities, which complicates defining resource appropriator rights and responsibilities.</p>
</listItem>
<listItem><label>•</label>
<p> Common agreement is needed among space actors on the bounds of the space domain to allow resource appropriators to set the governance limitations, who has the right to make use of it and what governance regime applies.</p>
</listItem>
<listItem><label>•</label>
<p> Existing institutions for debating, creating and modifying space governance regimes fall short of the requirement that most actors affected by the rules can participate in their creation.</p>
</listItem>
<listItem><label>•</label>
<p> Space situational awareness will play a crucial role in monitoring the status of the space commons, adherence to rules and norms, and creating transparency and confidence among space actors.</p>
</listItem>
</list>
</p>
</section>
</abstract>
</abstractGroup>
</contentMeta>
</header>
</component>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Application of Ostrom’s Principles for Sustainable Governance of Common‐Pool Resources to Near‐Earth Orbit</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Space as a Sustainable Commons?</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Application of Ostrom’s Principles for Sustainable Governance of Common‐Pool Resources to Near‐Earth Orbit</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Joan</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Johnson‐Freese</namePart>
<affiliation>Naval War College, USA</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Brian</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Weeden</namePart>
<affiliation>Secure World Foundation, USA</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre>
<originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm>
</place>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2012-02</dateIssued>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">0</extent>
<extent unit="tables">0</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract>Near‐Earth orbit is a key global resource, hosting assets critical to governments, militaries and commercial entities and providing services for global communications, remote sensing, national and international security, and accurate positioning and timing. It is also an increasingly crowded, congested and contested environment, at risk from both intentional and unintentional activities and events, and threats natural and human‐made. Ensuring the long‐term sustainability of the space environment is an increasingly recognized need by all users of space. This article considers the viability of principles regarding sustainable common‐pool resources (CPRs) established by Elinor Ostrom for space governance. In this initial consideration, we focus specifically on the issues of boundaries, collective choice arrangements and monitoring. Within those contexts, Ostrom’s principles appear most useful for identifying gaps in the current space governance system and mechanisms. Further, while Ostrom provides multiple success stories for her model, they typically include common‐pool regimes functioning at a local level, with success stories on a larger scale elusive. Near‐Earth orbit is perhaps the largest‐scale CPR to consider. Consequently, not only is additional work needed to relate Ostrom’s model specifically to space, but to determine the limits of applicability of Ostrom’s model and other models that should be considered.</abstract>
<abstract>• The global commons of outer space, particularly the region where satellites orbit around the Earth, faces a collective action problem of how to ensure the long‐term sustainability of space activities. • The current governance mechanisms for outer space activities were largely developed during the cold war, and are not sufficient to deal with the collective action problems stemming from the growing number of space actors and users. • Space actors exist with varying levels of capabilities, which complicates defining resource appropriator rights and responsibilities. • Common agreement is needed among space actors on the bounds of the space domain to allow resource appropriators to set the governance limitations, who has the right to make use of it and what governance regime applies. • Existing institutions for debating, creating and modifying space governance regimes fall short of the requirement that most actors affected by the rules can participate in their creation. • Space situational awareness will play a crucial role in monitoring the status of the space commons, adherence to rules and norms, and creating transparency and confidence among space actors.</abstract>
<relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Global Policy</title>
</titleInfo>
<genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre>
<subject><genre>article-category</genre>
<topic>Special Section: Research Article</topic>
</subject>
<identifier type="ISSN">1758-5880</identifier>
<identifier type="eISSN">1758-5899</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1758-5899</identifier>
<identifier type="PublisherID">GPOL</identifier>
<part><date>2012</date>
<detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption>
<number>3</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption>
<number>1</number>
</detail>
<extent unit="pages"><start>72</start>
<end>81</end>
<total>10</total>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">EEB6C2928923A2611C48EE806D2DB024A7FA2E5D</identifier>
<identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-QJ579PFH-9</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1758-5899.2011.00109.x</identifier>
<identifier type="ArticleID">GPOL109</identifier>
<accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2012 London School of Economics and Political Science and John Wiley & Sons Ltd</accessCondition>
<recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource>
<recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
<json:item><extension>json</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/json</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/EEB6C2928923A2611C48EE806D2DB024A7FA2E5D/metadata/json</uri>
</json:item>
</metadata>
<serie></serie>
</istex>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 007637 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 007637 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= Istex |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:EEB6C2928923A2611C48EE806D2DB024A7FA2E5D |texte= Application of Ostrom’s Principles for Sustainable Governance of Common‐Pool Resources to Near‐Earth Orbit }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. | ![]() |