The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: The Toronto study. Part III: Problems and complications encountered
Identifieur interne : 007103 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 007102; suivant : 007104The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: The Toronto study. Part III: Problems and complications encountered
Auteurs : G. A. Zarb ; A. SchmittSource :
- The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry [ 0022-3913 ] ; 1990.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Abutment screw, Acrylic resin, Adjacent implant, Branemark, Branemark system, Center screws, Circumoral activity, Clinical problem, Clinical problems, Clinical results, Complete dentures, Complication, Corresponding implants, Dentistry, Denture, Dramatic example, Edentulous patients, Fracture, Functional complaints, Gingival, Gingival problems, Gingival tissues, Granulation tissue, Healing period, Hypertrophic gingivitis, Implant, Implant fractures, Implant losses, Implant placement, Individual implants, Longitudinal, Longitudinal study, Mandibular, Mandibular prostheses, Maxillary, Maxillary dentures, Maximum amount, Mental nerve, Midline fracture, Oeseointegrated implants, Oral maxillofac implants, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implants, Osseointegration, Prospective study, Prosthesis, Prosthet dent, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Prosthetic superstructure, Prosthetic teeth, Prosthetic treatment, Prosthodontic, Prosthodontic department, Prosthodontic problems, Prosthodontic treatment, Provisional prosthesis, Schmitt, Side effects, Sleeper, Stagei surgery, Success criteria, Success rate, Surgical, Suture remnants, Toronto study, Zarb.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Abutment screw, Acrylic resin, Adjacent implant, Branemark, Branemark system, Center screws, Circumoral activity, Clinical problem, Clinical problems, Clinical results, Complete dentures, Complication, Corresponding implants, Dentistry, Denture, Dramatic example, Edentulous patients, Fracture, Functional complaints, Gingival, Gingival problems, Gingival tissues, Granulation tissue, Healing period, Hypertrophic gingivitis, Implant, Implant fractures, Implant losses, Implant placement, Individual implants, Longitudinal, Longitudinal study, Mandibular, Mandibular prostheses, Maxillary, Maxillary dentures, Maximum amount, Mental nerve, Midline fracture, Oeseointegrated implants, Oral maxillofac implants, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implants, Osseointegration, Prospective study, Prosthesis, Prosthet dent, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Prosthetic superstructure, Prosthetic teeth, Prosthetic treatment, Prosthodontic, Prosthodontic department, Prosthodontic problems, Prosthodontic treatment, Provisional prosthesis, Schmitt, Side effects, Sleeper, Stagei surgery, Success criteria, Success rate, Surgical, Suture remnants, Toronto study, Zarb.
Abstract
Abstract: Two hundred seventy-four implants were placed in 49 dental arches of 46 consecutively treated patients. The success rate for individual implants in this study, 4 to 9 years after placement, was 89.05% and for the prosthetic treatment it was 100%. Problems and complications were observed and recorded at stage I surgery, between stage I and stage II surgery, at stage II surgery, and in the healing period that followed. Also noted were the complications subsequent to prosthodontic treatment and during the years of follow-up. Virtually all of the problems encountered were iatrogenic in nature. These clinical results indicate a safe and retrievable technique with negligible associated morbidity.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90177-E
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:E358E741E1312E7CA0AE8D64C29F9A5D801874ABLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: The Toronto study. Part III: Problems and complications encountered</title><author><name sortKey="Zarb, G A" sort="Zarb, G A" uniqKey="Zarb G" first="G. A." last="Zarb">G. A. Zarb</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Toronto, Faculty of Dentistry, Toronto, Ont., Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schmitt, A" sort="Schmitt, A" uniqKey="Schmitt A" first="A." last="Schmitt">A. Schmitt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Toronto, Faculty of Dentistry, Toronto, Ont., Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:E358E741E1312E7CA0AE8D64C29F9A5D801874AB</idno><date when="1990" year="1990">1990</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/0022-3913(90)90177-E</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/E358E741E1312E7CA0AE8D64C29F9A5D801874AB/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">007103</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">007103</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: The Toronto study. Part III: Problems and complications encountered</title><author><name sortKey="Zarb, G A" sort="Zarb, G A" uniqKey="Zarb G" first="G. A." last="Zarb">G. A. Zarb</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Toronto, Faculty of Dentistry, Toronto, Ont., Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schmitt, A" sort="Schmitt, A" uniqKey="Schmitt A" first="A." last="Schmitt">A. Schmitt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Toronto, Faculty of Dentistry, Toronto, Ont., Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">YMPR</title><idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1990">1990</date><biblScope unit="volume">64</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="185">185</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="194">194</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment screw</term><term>Acrylic resin</term><term>Adjacent implant</term><term>Branemark</term><term>Branemark system</term><term>Center screws</term><term>Circumoral activity</term><term>Clinical problem</term><term>Clinical problems</term><term>Clinical results</term><term>Complete dentures</term><term>Complication</term><term>Corresponding implants</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Dramatic example</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Fracture</term><term>Functional complaints</term><term>Gingival</term><term>Gingival problems</term><term>Gingival tissues</term><term>Granulation tissue</term><term>Healing period</term><term>Hypertrophic gingivitis</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant fractures</term><term>Implant losses</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Individual implants</term><term>Longitudinal</term><term>Longitudinal study</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular prostheses</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maxillary dentures</term><term>Maximum amount</term><term>Mental nerve</term><term>Midline fracture</term><term>Oeseointegrated implants</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Prosthetic superstructure</term><term>Prosthetic teeth</term><term>Prosthetic treatment</term><term>Prosthodontic</term><term>Prosthodontic department</term><term>Prosthodontic problems</term><term>Prosthodontic treatment</term><term>Provisional prosthesis</term><term>Schmitt</term><term>Side effects</term><term>Sleeper</term><term>Stagei surgery</term><term>Success criteria</term><term>Success rate</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Suture remnants</term><term>Toronto study</term><term>Zarb</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment screw</term><term>Acrylic resin</term><term>Adjacent implant</term><term>Branemark</term><term>Branemark system</term><term>Center screws</term><term>Circumoral activity</term><term>Clinical problem</term><term>Clinical problems</term><term>Clinical results</term><term>Complete dentures</term><term>Complication</term><term>Corresponding implants</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Dramatic example</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Fracture</term><term>Functional complaints</term><term>Gingival</term><term>Gingival problems</term><term>Gingival tissues</term><term>Granulation tissue</term><term>Healing period</term><term>Hypertrophic gingivitis</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant fractures</term><term>Implant losses</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Individual implants</term><term>Longitudinal</term><term>Longitudinal study</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular prostheses</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maxillary dentures</term><term>Maximum amount</term><term>Mental nerve</term><term>Midline fracture</term><term>Oeseointegrated implants</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Prosthetic superstructure</term><term>Prosthetic teeth</term><term>Prosthetic treatment</term><term>Prosthodontic</term><term>Prosthodontic department</term><term>Prosthodontic problems</term><term>Prosthodontic treatment</term><term>Provisional prosthesis</term><term>Schmitt</term><term>Side effects</term><term>Sleeper</term><term>Stagei surgery</term><term>Success criteria</term><term>Success rate</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Suture remnants</term><term>Toronto study</term><term>Zarb</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: Two hundred seventy-four implants were placed in 49 dental arches of 46 consecutively treated patients. The success rate for individual implants in this study, 4 to 9 years after placement, was 89.05% and for the prosthetic treatment it was 100%. Problems and complications were observed and recorded at stage I surgery, between stage I and stage II surgery, at stage II surgery, and in the healing period that followed. Also noted were the complications subsequent to prosthodontic treatment and during the years of follow-up. Virtually all of the problems encountered were iatrogenic in nature. These clinical results indicate a safe and retrievable technique with negligible associated morbidity.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>elsevier</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>prosthetic</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated</json:string><json:string>prosthodontic</json:string><json:string>gingival</json:string><json:string>osseointegration</json:string><json:string>maxillary</json:string><json:string>zarb</json:string><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>fracture</json:string><json:string>branemark</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>toronto study</json:string><json:string>mandibular</json:string><json:string>prosthodontic treatment</json:string><json:string>surgical</json:string><json:string>granulation tissue</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>gingival tissues</json:string><json:string>gingival problems</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string><json:string>longitudinal</json:string><json:string>prosthodontic department</json:string><json:string>branemark system</json:string><json:string>prosthetic treatment</json:string><json:string>mandibular prostheses</json:string><json:string>midline fracture</json:string><json:string>maxillary dentures</json:string><json:string>complication</json:string><json:string>adjacent implant</json:string><json:string>clinical results</json:string><json:string>healing period</json:string><json:string>stagei surgery</json:string><json:string>dramatic example</json:string><json:string>hypertrophic gingivitis</json:string><json:string>maximum amount</json:string><json:string>mental nerve</json:string><json:string>individual implants</json:string><json:string>success rate</json:string><json:string>clinical problems</json:string><json:string>circumoral activity</json:string><json:string>suture remnants</json:string><json:string>provisional prosthesis</json:string><json:string>prosthodontic problems</json:string><json:string>oeseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>longitudinal study</json:string><json:string>prosthetic dentistry</json:string><json:string>corresponding implants</json:string><json:string>abutment screw</json:string><json:string>prosthetic superstructure</json:string><json:string>center screws</json:string><json:string>implant fractures</json:string><json:string>side effects</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string><json:string>functional complaints</json:string><json:string>implant losses</json:string><json:string>success criteria</json:string><json:string>acrylic resin</json:string><json:string>prospective study</json:string><json:string>complete dentures</json:string><json:string>prosthetic teeth</json:string><json:string>prosthet dent</json:string><json:string>clinical problem</json:string><json:string>schmitt</json:string><json:string>sleeper</json:string></teeft></keywords><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Maxillofacial prosthetics and dental implants</value></json:item></subject><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>Full-length article</json:string></originalGenre><qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>108</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>709</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>1</keywordCount><score>7.851</score><pdfWordCount>4555</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>30925</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>10</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>612 x 828 pts</pdfPageSize></qualityIndicators><title>The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: The Toronto study. Part III: Problems and complications encountered</title><pii><json:string>0022-3913(90)90177-E</json:string></pii><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><title>The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><publicationDate>1990</publicationDate><issn><json:string>0022-3913</json:string></issn><pii><json:string>S0022-3913(05)X8119-7</json:string></pii><volume>64</volume><issue>2</issue><pages><first>185</first><last>194</last></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1990</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>University of Toronto</json:string><json:string>Ministry of Health</json:string><json:string>Department of Oral Medicine</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>M.Sc</json:string><json:string>Professor</json:string><json:string>American</json:string><json:string>Janet DeWinter</json:string><json:string>Horst Krull</json:string><json:string>Francis Zarb</json:string><json:string>The</json:string><json:string>B.Ch</json:string><json:string>A. Schmitt</json:string><json:string>John Cox</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Canada</json:string><json:string>TORONTO</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Worthington et al.</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/6H6-3T92KQJ9-S</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>1990</publicationDate><author><json:item><name>G.A. Zarb B.Ch.D., D.D.S., M.S., M.S., F.R.C.D.(C)</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Toronto, Faculty of Dentistry, Toronto, Ont., Canada</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>A. Schmitt M.Sc., D.D.S.</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Toronto, Faculty of Dentistry, Toronto, Ont., Canada</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>9090177E</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/6H6-3T92KQJ9-S</arkIstex><abstract>Abstract: Two hundred seventy-four implants were placed in 49 dental arches of 46 consecutively treated patients. The success rate for individual implants in this study, 4 to 9 years after placement, was 89.05% and for the prosthetic treatment it was 100%. Problems and complications were observed and recorded at stage I surgery, between stage I and stage II surgery, at stage II surgery, and in the healing period that followed. Also noted were the complications subsequent to prosthodontic treatment and during the years of follow-up. Virtually all of the problems encountered were iatrogenic in nature. These clinical results indicate a safe and retrievable technique with negligible associated morbidity.</abstract><pmid><json:string>2202818</json:string></pmid><serie><title>Rochester, Minn: Mayo Clin Proc</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><volume>61</volume><pages><first>91</first><last>97</last></pages></serie><copyrightDate>1990</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1016/0022-3913(90)90177-E</json:string></doi><id>E358E741E1312E7CA0AE8D64C29F9A5D801874AB</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E358E741E1312E7CA0AE8D64C29F9A5D801874AB/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E358E741E1312E7CA0AE8D64C29F9A5D801874AB/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/E358E741E1312E7CA0AE8D64C29F9A5D801874AB/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: The Toronto study. Part III: Problems and complications encountered</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><availability><p>©1990 Mosby-Year Book, Inc.</p></availability><date>1990</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note>Supported by the Ministry of Health of Ontario Research grant No. PR 882.</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: The Toronto study. Part III: Problems and complications encountered</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">G.A.</forename><surname>Zarb</surname></persName><roleName type="degree">B.Ch.D., D.D.S., M.S., M.S., F.R.C.D.(C)</roleName><note type="biography">Reprint requests to: Dr. George A. Zarb Faculty of Dentistry University of Toronto 124 Edward St., Toronto M5G 1G6 Canada.</note><note type="biography">Professor, Head, Prosthodontic Department.</note><affiliation>Reprint requests to: Dr. George A. Zarb Faculty of Dentistry University of Toronto 124 Edward St., Toronto M5G 1G6 Canada.</affiliation><affiliation>Professor, Head, Prosthodontic Department.</affiliation><affiliation>University of Toronto, Faculty of Dentistry, Toronto, Ont., Canada</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">A.</forename><surname>Schmitt</surname></persName><roleName type="degree">M.Sc., D.D.S.</roleName><note type="biography">Assistant Professor, Prosthodontic Department.</note><affiliation>Assistant Professor, Prosthodontic Department.</affiliation><affiliation>University of Toronto, Faculty of Dentistry, Toronto, Ont., Canada</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">E358E741E1312E7CA0AE8D64C29F9A5D801874AB</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/0022-3913(90)90177-E</idno><idno type="PII">0022-3913(90)90177-E</idno><idno type="ArticleID">9090177E</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j">The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">YMPR</title><idno type="pISSN">0022-3913</idno><idno type="PII">S0022-3913(05)X8119-7</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1990"></date><biblScope unit="volume">64</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="185">185</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="194">194</biblScope></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1990</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Abstract: Two hundred seventy-four implants were placed in 49 dental arches of 46 consecutively treated patients. The success rate for individual implants in this study, 4 to 9 years after placement, was 89.05% and for the prosthetic treatment it was 100%. Problems and complications were observed and recorded at stage I surgery, between stage I and stage II surgery, at stage II surgery, and in the healing period that followed. Also noted were the complications subsequent to prosthodontic treatment and during the years of follow-up. Virtually all of the problems encountered were iatrogenic in nature. These clinical results indicate a safe and retrievable technique with negligible associated morbidity.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>article-category</head><item><term>Maxillofacial prosthetics and dental implants</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1990">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E358E741E1312E7CA0AE8D64C29F9A5D801874AB/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Elsevier doc found" wicri:toSee="Elsevier, no converted or simple article"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//ES//DTD journal article DTD version 5.0.1//EN//XML" URI="art501.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><article version="5.0" xml:lang="en" docsubtype="fla"><item-info><jid>YMPR</jid><aid>9090177E</aid><ce:pii>0022-3913(90)90177-E</ce:pii><ce:doi>10.1016/0022-3913(90)90177-E</ce:doi><ce:copyright type="unknown" year="1990">Mosby-Year Book, Inc.</ce:copyright><ce:doctopics><ce:doctopic><ce:text>Maxillofacial prosthetics and dental implants</ce:text></ce:doctopic></ce:doctopics></item-info><head><ce:article-footnote><ce:note-para>Supported by the Ministry of Health of Ontario Research grant No. PR 882.</ce:note-para></ce:article-footnote><ce:title>The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: The Toronto study. Part III: Problems and complications encountered</ce:title><ce:author-group><ce:author><ce:given-name>G.A.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Zarb</ce:surname><ce:degrees>B.Ch.D., D.D.S., M.S., M.S., F.R.C.D.(C)</ce:degrees><ce:cross-ref refid="cor1"><ce:sup>*</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="fn1"><ce:sup>*</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>A.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Schmitt</ce:surname><ce:degrees>M.Sc., D.D.S.</ce:degrees><ce:cross-ref refid="fn2"><ce:sup>**</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:affiliation><ce:textfn>University of Toronto, Faculty of Dentistry, Toronto, Ont., Canada</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation><ce:correspondence id="cor1"><ce:label>*</ce:label><ce:text><ce:italic>Reprint requests to:</ce:italic> <ce:small-caps>Dr. George A. Zarb Faculty of Dentistry University of Toronto</ce:small-caps> 124 <ce:small-caps>Edward St.</ce:small-caps>, Toronto M5G 1G6 Canada.</ce:text></ce:correspondence><ce:footnote id="fn1"><ce:label>*</ce:label><ce:note-para>Professor, Head, Prosthodontic Department.</ce:note-para></ce:footnote><ce:footnote id="fn2"><ce:label>**</ce:label><ce:note-para>Assistant Professor, Prosthodontic Department.</ce:note-para></ce:footnote></ce:author-group><ce:abstract id="ab1" class="author" xml:lang="en"><ce:section-title>Abstract</ce:section-title><ce:abstract-sec><ce:simple-para>Two hundred seventy-four implants were placed in 49 dental arches of 46 consecutively treated patients. The success rate for individual implants in this study, 4 to 9 years after placement, was 89.05% and for the prosthetic treatment it was 100%. Problems and complications were observed and recorded at stage I surgery, between stage I and stage II surgery, at stage II surgery, and in the healing period that followed. Also noted were the complications subsequent to prosthodontic treatment and during the years of follow-up. Virtually all of the problems encountered were iatrogenic in nature. These clinical results indicate a safe and retrievable technique with negligible associated morbidity.</ce:simple-para></ce:abstract-sec></ce:abstract></head><tail><ce:bibliography><ce:section-title>References</ce:section-title><ce:bibliography-sec><ce:bib-reference id="bib1"><ce:label>1.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Adell</ce:surname><ce:given-name>R</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Lekholm</ce:surname><ce:given-name>U</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Rockler</ce:surname><ce:given-name>B</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Branemark</ce:surname><ce:given-name>P-I</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Int J Oral Surg</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>10</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1981</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>387</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>416</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib2"><ce:label>2.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Cox</ce:surname><ce:given-name>JF</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Zarb</ce:surname><ce:given-name>GA</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>The longitudinal clinical efficacy of osseointegrated dental implants: a 3-year report</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>2</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1987</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>91</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>100</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib3"><ce:label>3.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Laney</ce:surname><ce:given-name>WR</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Tolman</ce:surname><ce:given-name>DE</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Keller</ce:surname><ce:given-name>EE</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Desjardins</ce:surname><ce:given-name>RP</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Van Roekel</ce:surname><ce:given-name>NB</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Branemark</ce:surname><ce:given-name>P-I</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Dental implants: tissue-integrated prosthesis utilizing the osseointegration concept</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:edited-book><sb:edition>9th ed</sb:edition><sb:book-series><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Rochester, Minn: Mayo Clin Proc</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>61</sb:volume-nr></sb:series></sb:book-series><sb:date>1987</sb:date></sb:edited-book><sb:pages><sb:first-page>91</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>97</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib4"><ce:label>4.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Henry</ce:surname><ce:given-name>PJ</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Osseointegrated dental implants: 2-year follow-up replication study</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:edited-book><sb:title><sb:maintitle>24th Australian Dental Congress</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:conference>Brisbane, May 1985</sb:conference><sb:edition>9th ed</sb:edition><sb:book-series><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Aust Dent J</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>31</sb:volume-nr></sb:series></sb:book-series><sb:date>1986</sb:date></sb:edited-book><sb:pages><sb:first-page>247</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>256</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib5"><ce:label>5.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>van Steenberghe</ce:surname><ce:given-name>D</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Quirynen</ce:surname><ce:given-name>M</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Calberson</ce:surname><ce:given-name>L</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Demanet</ce:surname><ce:given-name>M</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>A prospective evaluation of the fate of 697 consecutive intraoral fixtures modum Branemark in the rehabilitation of edentulism</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Head Neck Pathol</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>6</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1987</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>53</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>58</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib6"><ce:label>6.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Lindquist</ce:surname><ce:given-name>LW</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Prosthetic rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:edited-book><sb:edition>9th ed</sb:edition><sb:book-series><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Thesis</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:series></sb:book-series><sb:date>1987</sb:date><sb:publisher><sb:name>University of Goteborg</sb:name><sb:location>Goteborg, Sweden</sb:location></sb:publisher></sb:edited-book></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib7"><ce:label>7.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Branemark</ce:surname><ce:given-name>P-I</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Zarb</ce:surname><ce:given-name>GA</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Albrektsson</ce:surname><ce:given-name>T</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Tissue integrated prostheses. Osseointegration in clinical dentistry</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:book><sb:date>1985</sb:date><sb:publisher><sb:name>Quintessence International Co</sb:name><sb:location>Chicago</sb:location></sb:publisher></sb:book></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib8"><ce:label>8.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Zarb</ce:surname><ce:given-name>GA</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Schmitt</ce:surname><ce:given-name>A</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: the Toronto study. Part I. Surgical results</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Prosthet Dent</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>63</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1990</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>451</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>457</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib9"><ce:label>9.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Zarb</ce:surname><ce:given-name>GA</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Schmitt</ce:surname><ce:given-name>A</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: the Toronto study. Part II. The prosthetic results</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Prosthet Dent</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>64</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1990</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>53</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>61</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib10"><ce:label>10.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Albrektsson</ce:surname><ce:given-name>T</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Zarb</ce:surname><ce:given-name>GA</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Worthington</ce:surname><ce:given-name>P</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Eriksson</ce:surname><ce:given-name>AR</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>1</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1986</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>11</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>25</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib11"><ce:label>11.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Worthington</ce:surname><ce:given-name>P</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Bolender</ce:surname><ce:given-name>C</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Taylor</ce:surname><ce:given-name>T</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>The Swedish system of osseointegrated implants: problems and complications encountered during a 4-year trial period</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>2</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1987</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>77</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>84</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib12"><ce:label>12.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Wennstrom</ce:surname><ce:given-name>J</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Lindhe</ce:surname><ce:given-name>J</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Nyman</ce:surname><ce:given-name>S</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>The role of keratinized gingiva in plaque-associated gingivitis in dogs</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Clin Periodontol</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>9</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1982</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>75</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>100</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib13"><ce:label>13.</ce:label><ce:other-ref><ce:textref>CPS'88: Compendium of pharmaceuticals and specialties. Ottawa, Ont: Canadian Pharmaceutical Association.</ce:textref></ce:other-ref></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib14"><ce:label>14.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Hickey</ce:surname><ce:given-name>JC</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Zarb</ce:surname><ce:given-name>GA</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Bolender</ce:surname><ce:given-name>C</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Boucher's prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:book><sb:edition>9th ed</sb:edition><sb:date>1985</sb:date><sb:publisher><sb:name>CV Mosby Co</sb:name><sb:location>St Louis</sb:location></sb:publisher></sb:book></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib15"><ce:label>15.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Nyman</ce:surname><ce:given-name>S</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Lindhe</ce:surname><ce:given-name>J</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>A longitudinal study of combined periodontal and prosthetic treatment of patients with advanced periodontal disease</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Periodontol</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>50</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1979</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>163</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>169</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib16"><ce:label>16.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Carr</ce:surname><ce:given-name>AB</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Laney</ce:surname><ce:given-name>WR</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Maximum occlusal force levels in patients with osseointegrated oral implant prostheses and patients with complete dentures</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>2</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1987</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>101</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>108</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib17"><ce:label>17.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Stafford</ce:surname><ce:given-name>D</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Glants</ce:surname><ce:given-name>PO</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Lindquist</ce:surname><ce:given-name>L</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Strandman</ce:surname><ce:given-name>E</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Influence of treatment with osseointegrated mandibular bridges on the clinical deformation of maxillary dentures in prosthetic reconstructions on osseointegrated implants</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Swed Dent J</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:series><sb:issue-nr>Suppl 28</sb:issue-nr><sb:date>1985</sb:date></sb:issue></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference></ce:bibliography-sec></ce:bibliography></tail></article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: The Toronto study. Part III: Problems and complications encountered</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" lang="en" contentType="CDATA"><title>The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: The Toronto study. Part III: Problems and complications encountered</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">G.A.</namePart><namePart type="family">Zarb</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">B.Ch.D., D.D.S., M.S., M.S., F.R.C.D.(C)</namePart><affiliation>University of Toronto, Faculty of Dentistry, Toronto, Ont., Canada</affiliation><description>Reprint requests to: Dr. George A. Zarb Faculty of Dentistry University of Toronto 124 Edward St., Toronto M5G 1G6 Canada.</description><description>Professor, Head, Prosthodontic Department.</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">A.</namePart><namePart type="family">Schmitt</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">M.Sc., D.D.S.</namePart><affiliation>University of Toronto, Faculty of Dentistry, Toronto, Ont., Canada</affiliation><description>Assistant Professor, Prosthodontic Department.</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="Full-length article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1990</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1990</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><abstract lang="en">Abstract: Two hundred seventy-four implants were placed in 49 dental arches of 46 consecutively treated patients. The success rate for individual implants in this study, 4 to 9 years after placement, was 89.05% and for the prosthetic treatment it was 100%. Problems and complications were observed and recorded at stage I surgery, between stage I and stage II surgery, at stage II surgery, and in the healing period that followed. Also noted were the complications subsequent to prosthodontic treatment and during the years of follow-up. Virtually all of the problems encountered were iatrogenic in nature. These clinical results indicate a safe and retrievable technique with negligible associated morbidity.</abstract><note>Supported by the Ministry of Health of Ontario Research grant No. PR 882.</note><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Maxillofacial prosthetics and dental implants</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>YMPR</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">199008</dateIssued></originInfo><identifier type="ISSN">0022-3913</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0022-3913(05)X8119-7</identifier><part><date>199008</date><detail type="volume"><number>64</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="issue"><number>2</number><caption>no.</caption></detail><extent unit="issue-pages"><start>A5</start><end>A24</end></extent><extent unit="issue-pages"><start>127</start><end>246</end></extent><extent unit="pages"><start>185</start><end>194</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">E358E741E1312E7CA0AE8D64C29F9A5D801874AB</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/6H6-3T92KQJ9-S</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1016/0022-3913(90)90177-E</identifier><identifier type="PII">0022-3913(90)90177-E</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">9090177E</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">©1990 Mosby-Year Book, Inc.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-HKKZVM7B-M">elsevier</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Mosby-Year Book, Inc., ©1990</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E358E741E1312E7CA0AE8D64C29F9A5D801874AB/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 007103 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 007103 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:E358E741E1312E7CA0AE8D64C29F9A5D801874AB
|texte= The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: The Toronto study. Part III: Problems and complications encountered
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |