Effect of Smoking Habits on Accuracy of Implant Placement Using Mucosally Supported Stereolithographic Surgical Guides
Identifieur interne : 007102 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 007101; suivant : 007103Effect of Smoking Habits on Accuracy of Implant Placement Using Mucosally Supported Stereolithographic Surgical Guides
Auteurs : Jan D'Haese ; Hugo De BruynSource :
- Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 2013-06.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Alveolar crest, Angular deviation, Apical, Apical deviation, Apical point, Astra tech, Clin, Clin implant dent relat, Clinical implant dentistry, Coronal, Cumulative percentage, Cutoff point, Dental implants, Edentulous maxillae, Global apical deviation, Global coronal, Higher apical deviation, Implant, Implant placement, Implant surgery, Lateral deviation, Longitudinal axis, Maxilla, Mucosal, Mucosal structures, Mucosal thickness, Mucosal tissues, Mucosally, Nonsmoker, Nonsmoking, Nonsmoking subgroup, Oral maxillofac implants, Patient level, Prosthesis, Reference plane, Reference points, Scanning prosthesis, Scanning template, Smoker, Smokers group, Smoking, Smoking habits, Smoking population, Smoking subgroup, Software, Stereolithographic, Study groups, Subgroup, Surgical, Surgical guide, Surgical guides, Systemic disease, Tangential line, Xation.
- Teeft :
- Alveolar crest, Angular deviation, Apical, Apical deviation, Apical point, Astra tech, Clin, Clin implant dent relat, Clinical implant dentistry, Coronal, Cumulative percentage, Cutoff point, Dental implants, Edentulous maxillae, Global apical deviation, Global coronal, Higher apical deviation, Implant, Implant placement, Implant surgery, Lateral deviation, Longitudinal axis, Maxilla, Mucosal, Mucosal structures, Mucosal thickness, Mucosal tissues, Mucosally, Nonsmoker, Nonsmoking, Nonsmoking subgroup, Oral maxillofac implants, Patient level, Prosthesis, Reference plane, Reference points, Scanning prosthesis, Scanning template, Smoker, Smokers group, Smoking, Smoking habits, Smoking population, Smoking subgroup, Software, Stereolithographic, Study groups, Subgroup, Surgical, Surgical guide, Surgical guides, Systemic disease, Tangential line, Xation.
Abstract
Background: Smoking is considered as a factor for implant survival and peri‐implant bone loss of dental implants. Several studies revealed the negative effect of smoking on osseointegration and its dose‐related effect.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00353.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:E3565B15AF4945A2772D182922D865735CDF25BCLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Effect of Smoking Habits on Accuracy of Implant Placement Using Mucosally Supported Stereolithographic Surgical Guides</title><author><name sortKey="D Haese, Jan" sort="D Haese, Jan" uniqKey="D Haese J" first="Jan" last="D'Haese">Jan D'Haese</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Tandkliniek Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Belgium;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: jdhaese@base.be</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Bruyn, Hugo" sort="De Bruyn, Hugo" uniqKey="De Bruyn H" first="Hugo" last="De Bruyn">Hugo De Bruyn</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:E3565B15AF4945A2772D182922D865735CDF25BC</idno><date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00353.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/E3565B15AF4945A2772D182922D865735CDF25BC/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">007102</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">007102</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Effect of Smoking Habits on Accuracy of Implant Placement Using Mucosally Supported Stereolithographic Surgical Guides</title><author><name sortKey="D Haese, Jan" sort="D Haese, Jan" uniqKey="D Haese J" first="Jan" last="D'Haese">Jan D'Haese</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Tandkliniek Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Belgium;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: jdhaese@base.be</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Bruyn, Hugo" sort="De Bruyn, Hugo" uniqKey="De Bruyn H" first="Hugo" last="De Bruyn">Hugo De Bruyn</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">15</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="402">402</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="411">411</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">10</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2013-06">2013-06</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar crest</term><term>Angular deviation</term><term>Apical</term><term>Apical deviation</term><term>Apical point</term><term>Astra tech</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin implant dent relat</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Coronal</term><term>Cumulative percentage</term><term>Cutoff point</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Edentulous maxillae</term><term>Global apical deviation</term><term>Global coronal</term><term>Higher apical deviation</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant surgery</term><term>Lateral deviation</term><term>Longitudinal axis</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Mucosal</term><term>Mucosal structures</term><term>Mucosal thickness</term><term>Mucosal tissues</term><term>Mucosally</term><term>Nonsmoker</term><term>Nonsmoking</term><term>Nonsmoking subgroup</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Patient level</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Reference plane</term><term>Reference points</term><term>Scanning prosthesis</term><term>Scanning template</term><term>Smoker</term><term>Smokers group</term><term>Smoking</term><term>Smoking habits</term><term>Smoking population</term><term>Smoking subgroup</term><term>Software</term><term>Stereolithographic</term><term>Study groups</term><term>Subgroup</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical guide</term><term>Surgical guides</term><term>Systemic disease</term><term>Tangential line</term><term>Xation</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar crest</term><term>Angular deviation</term><term>Apical</term><term>Apical deviation</term><term>Apical point</term><term>Astra tech</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin implant dent relat</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Coronal</term><term>Cumulative percentage</term><term>Cutoff point</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Edentulous maxillae</term><term>Global apical deviation</term><term>Global coronal</term><term>Higher apical deviation</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant surgery</term><term>Lateral deviation</term><term>Longitudinal axis</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Mucosal</term><term>Mucosal structures</term><term>Mucosal thickness</term><term>Mucosal tissues</term><term>Mucosally</term><term>Nonsmoker</term><term>Nonsmoking</term><term>Nonsmoking subgroup</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Patient level</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Reference plane</term><term>Reference points</term><term>Scanning prosthesis</term><term>Scanning template</term><term>Smoker</term><term>Smokers group</term><term>Smoking</term><term>Smoking habits</term><term>Smoking population</term><term>Smoking subgroup</term><term>Software</term><term>Stereolithographic</term><term>Study groups</term><term>Subgroup</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical guide</term><term>Surgical guides</term><term>Systemic disease</term><term>Tangential line</term><term>Xation</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Background: Smoking is considered as a factor for implant survival and peri‐implant bone loss of dental implants. Several studies revealed the negative effect of smoking on osseointegration and its dose‐related effect.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>smoker</json:string><json:string>nonsmoker</json:string><json:string>mucosal</json:string><json:string>apical</json:string><json:string>stereolithographic</json:string><json:string>coronal</json:string><json:string>mucosal thickness</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>subgroup</json:string><json:string>mucosally</json:string><json:string>smoking habits</json:string><json:string>surgical guide</json:string><json:string>surgical</json:string><json:string>maxilla</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>nonsmoking</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>software</json:string><json:string>xation</json:string><json:string>apical deviation</json:string><json:string>astra tech</json:string><json:string>mucosal structures</json:string><json:string>angular deviation</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>smoking population</json:string><json:string>cutoff point</json:string><json:string>smoking subgroup</json:string><json:string>scanning template</json:string><json:string>global apical deviation</json:string><json:string>scanning prosthesis</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string><json:string>clin implant dent relat</json:string><json:string>longitudinal axis</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>smokers group</json:string><json:string>patient level</json:string><json:string>implant surgery</json:string><json:string>lateral deviation</json:string><json:string>mucosal tissues</json:string><json:string>reference plane</json:string><json:string>tangential line</json:string><json:string>alveolar crest</json:string><json:string>global coronal</json:string><json:string>study groups</json:string><json:string>edentulous maxillae</json:string><json:string>cumulative percentage</json:string><json:string>apical point</json:string><json:string>higher apical deviation</json:string><json:string>nonsmoking subgroup</json:string><json:string>reference points</json:string><json:string>systemic disease</json:string><json:string>surgical guides</json:string><json:string>smoking</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Jan D'haese DDS, MSc</name><affiliations><json:string>Tandkliniek Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Belgium;</json:string><json:string>E-mail: jdhaese@base.be</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Hugo De Bruyn DDS, MSc, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>accuracy</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>biotype</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>guided surgery</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>smoking</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>stereolithography</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CID353</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-JSTWXWLS-T</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Background: Smoking is considered as a factor for implant survival and peri‐implant bone loss of dental implants. Several studies revealed the negative effect of smoking on osseointegration and its dose‐related effect.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.646</score><pdfWordCount>4274</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>27862</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>10</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>585 x 783 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>31</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>218</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>6</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Effect of Smoking Habits on Accuracy of Implant Placement Using Mucosally Supported Stereolithographic Surgical Guides</title><pmid><json:string>21599833</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1523-0899</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1708-8208</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CID</json:string></publisherId><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><pages><first>402</first><last>411</last><total>10</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>ARTICLE</value></json:item></subject></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2013</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</json:string><json:string>SPSS Inc., Chicago</json:string><json:string>Related Research, Volume</json:string><json:string>Ghent University Hospital and Onze-Lieve-Vrouwe Hospital Aalst</json:string><json:string>Belgium Reprint</json:string><json:string>Dental School University</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Value</json:string><json:string>Selection</json:string><json:string>Graphic</json:string><json:string>Van De Velde</json:string><json:string>Figure</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Ghent</json:string><json:string>Canada</json:string><json:string>Leuven</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string><json:string>Belgium</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-JSTWXWLS-T</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2013</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2013</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00353.x</json:string></doi><id>E3565B15AF4945A2772D182922D865735CDF25BC</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E3565B15AF4945A2772D182922D865735CDF25BC/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E3565B15AF4945A2772D182922D865735CDF25BC/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/E3565B15AF4945A2772D182922D865735CDF25BC/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Effect of Smoking Habits on Accuracy of Implant Placement Using Mucosally Supported Stereolithographic Surgical Guides</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2013-06"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Effect of Smoking Habits on Accuracy of Implant Placement Using Mucosally Supported Stereolithographic Surgical Guides</title><title level="a" type="short">Effect of Smoking Habits on Accuracy of Implant Placement Using Mucosally Supported Stereolithographic Surgical Guides</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Jan</forename><surname>D'haese</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, MSc</roleName></persName><affiliation>Tandkliniek Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Belgium;<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Jan D'haese, Tandkliniek Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Schoolstraat 2b, 9520 Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Belgium; e‐mail: jdhaese@base.be</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Hugo</forename><surname>De Bruyn</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, MSc, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">E3565B15AF4945A2772D182922D865735CDF25BC</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-JSTWXWLS-T</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00353.x</idno><idno type="unit">CID353</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CID.CID353.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cid.2013.15.issue-3</idno><idno type="product">CID</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">15</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="402">402</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="411">411</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">10</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2013-06"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>ABSTRACT</head><p><hi rend="bold">Background:</hi> Smoking is considered as a factor for implant survival and peri‐implant bone loss of dental implants. Several studies revealed the negative effect of smoking on osseointegration and its dose‐related effect.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Purpose:</hi> To evaluate the effect of smoking habits on accuracy of implant placement using mucosally supported stereolithographic surgical guides.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Material and Methods:</hi> Six OsseoSpeed™ implants (Astra Tech AB, Mölndal, Sweden) were inserted into the maxilla in 13 patients. Patients were excluded if they suffered from any systemic disease or if they were actually taking any kind of medication. Software (Mimics® 9.0) was used to fuse images of the virtually planned and actually placed implants, and locations and axes were compared between the nonsmoking and smoking subgroups. As the mucosal biotype could probably influence accuracy data, 12 reference points were defined within each patient to define a mean mucosal thickness value.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results:</hi> In the smoking subgroup, 36 implants were placed compared with 42 in the nonsmoking subgroup. Mean coronal deviation was 1.04 mm (range: 0.29–2.45 mm) among the smokers compared with 0.80 mm among the nonsmokers (range: 0.29–1.67 mm). At apical point, mean deviation was 1.26 mm (range: 0.39–3.01 mm) among the smokers compared with 1.02 mm among the nonsmokers (range: 0.32–2.59 mm). Mean angular deviation was 2.64° (range: 0.41–6.81°) among the smokers compared with 2.57° among the nonsmokers (range: 0.16°–8.86°). Significant differences were found when comparing global coronal and apical deviation between the smokers and the nonsmokers (<hi rend="italic">p</hi> < .05). Evaluating mucosal thickness, mean value was 3.19 mm (range: 2.39–4.01 mm) among the smokers compared with 2.43 mm among the nonsmokers (range: 1.44–3.03 mm).</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusions:</hi> Statistically significant differences were found when comparing the accuracy of dental implant placement of the smokers with the nonsmokers. Smokers have significant thicker supporting mucosal tissues compared with nonsmokers, which may explain inaccuracy due to less stability of the surgical guide or the scanning prosthesis.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">accuracy</term><term xml:id="k2">biotype</term><term xml:id="k3">dental implants</term><term xml:id="k4">guided surgery</term><term xml:id="k5">smoking</term><term xml:id="k6">stereolithography</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>ARTICLES</term></keywords><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>ARTICLE</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E3565B15AF4945A2772D182922D865735CDF25BC/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</doi><issn type="print">1523-0899</issn><issn type="electronic">1708-8208</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CID"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="06103"><doi>10.1111/cid.2013.15.issue-3</doi><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering number="15" type="journalVolume">15</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">3</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2013-06">June 2013</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="100" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00353.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CID353"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="10"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">ARTICLES</title><title type="articleCategory">ARTICLE</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:3.2.2 mode:FullText" date="2013-05-22"></event><event date="2013-05-22" type="xmlCorrected"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2011-05-20"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2011-05-20"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2013-06-04"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.6.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-10-03"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">402</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">411</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Jan D'haese, Tandkliniek Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Schoolstraat 2b, 9520 Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Belgium; e‐mail: <email>jdhaese@base.be</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CID.CID353.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="7"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="3"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="23"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="4951"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Effect of Smoking Habits on Accuracy of Implant Placement Using Mucosally Supported Stereolithographic Surgical Guides</title><title type="shortAuthors">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Volume *, Number *, 2011</title><title type="short">Effect of Smoking Habits on Accuracy of Implant Placement Using Mucosally Supported Stereolithographic Surgical Guides</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Jan</givenNames><familyName>D'haese</familyName><degrees>DDS, MSc</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Hugo</givenNames><familyName>De Bruyn</familyName><degrees>DDS, MSc, PhD</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Tandkliniek Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Belgium;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">accuracy</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">biotype</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">dental implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">guided surgery</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">smoking</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">stereolithography</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p><b>Background:</b> Smoking is considered as a factor for implant survival and peri‐implant bone loss of dental implants. Several studies revealed the negative effect of smoking on osseointegration and its dose‐related effect.</p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To evaluate the effect of smoking habits on accuracy of implant placement using mucosally supported stereolithographic surgical guides.</p><p><b>Material and Methods:</b> Six OsseoSpeed™ implants (Astra Tech AB, Mölndal, Sweden) were inserted into the maxilla in 13 patients. Patients were excluded if they suffered from any systemic disease or if they were actually taking any kind of medication. Software (Mimics® 9.0) was used to fuse images of the virtually planned and actually placed implants, and locations and axes were compared between the nonsmoking and smoking subgroups. As the mucosal biotype could probably influence accuracy data, 12 reference points were defined within each patient to define a mean mucosal thickness value.</p><p><b>Results:</b> In the smoking subgroup, 36 implants were placed compared with 42 in the nonsmoking subgroup. Mean coronal deviation was 1.04 mm (range: 0.29–2.45 mm) among the smokers compared with 0.80 mm among the nonsmokers (range: 0.29–1.67 mm). At apical point, mean deviation was 1.26 mm (range: 0.39–3.01 mm) among the smokers compared with 1.02 mm among the nonsmokers (range: 0.32–2.59 mm). Mean angular deviation was 2.64° (range: 0.41–6.81°) among the smokers compared with 2.57° among the nonsmokers (range: 0.16°–8.86°). Significant differences were found when comparing global coronal and apical deviation between the smokers and the nonsmokers (<i>p</i> < .05). Evaluating mucosal thickness, mean value was 3.19 mm (range: 2.39–4.01 mm) among the smokers compared with 2.43 mm among the nonsmokers (range: 1.44–3.03 mm).</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Statistically significant differences were found when comparing the accuracy of dental implant placement of the smokers with the nonsmokers. Smokers have significant thicker supporting mucosal tissues compared with nonsmokers, which may explain inaccuracy due to less stability of the surgical guide or the scanning prosthesis.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Effect of Smoking Habits on Accuracy of Implant Placement Using Mucosally Supported Stereolithographic Surgical Guides</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Effect of Smoking Habits on Accuracy of Implant Placement Using Mucosally Supported Stereolithographic Surgical Guides</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Effect of Smoking Habits on Accuracy of Implant Placement Using Mucosally Supported Stereolithographic Surgical Guides</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Jan</namePart><namePart type="family">D'haese</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, MSc</namePart><affiliation>Tandkliniek Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Belgium;</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: jdhaese@base.be</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Hugo</namePart><namePart type="family">De Bruyn</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, MSc, PhD</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2013-06</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2013</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">7</extent><extent unit="tables">3</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">23</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent><extent unit="words">4951</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Background: Smoking is considered as a factor for implant survival and peri‐implant bone loss of dental implants. Several studies revealed the negative effect of smoking on osseointegration and its dose‐related effect.</abstract><abstract>Purpose: To evaluate the effect of smoking habits on accuracy of implant placement using mucosally supported stereolithographic surgical guides.</abstract><abstract>Material and Methods: Six OsseoSpeed™ implants (Astra Tech AB, Mölndal, Sweden) were inserted into the maxilla in 13 patients. Patients were excluded if they suffered from any systemic disease or if they were actually taking any kind of medication. Software (Mimics® 9.0) was used to fuse images of the virtually planned and actually placed implants, and locations and axes were compared between the nonsmoking and smoking subgroups. As the mucosal biotype could probably influence accuracy data, 12 reference points were defined within each patient to define a mean mucosal thickness value.</abstract><abstract>Results: In the smoking subgroup, 36 implants were placed compared with 42 in the nonsmoking subgroup. Mean coronal deviation was 1.04 mm (range: 0.29–2.45 mm) among the smokers compared with 0.80 mm among the nonsmokers (range: 0.29–1.67 mm). At apical point, mean deviation was 1.26 mm (range: 0.39–3.01 mm) among the smokers compared with 1.02 mm among the nonsmokers (range: 0.32–2.59 mm). Mean angular deviation was 2.64° (range: 0.41–6.81°) among the smokers compared with 2.57° among the nonsmokers (range: 0.16°–8.86°). Significant differences were found when comparing global coronal and apical deviation between the smokers and the nonsmokers (p < .05). Evaluating mucosal thickness, mean value was 3.19 mm (range: 2.39–4.01 mm) among the smokers compared with 2.43 mm among the nonsmokers (range: 1.44–3.03 mm).</abstract><abstract>Conclusions: Statistically significant differences were found when comparing the accuracy of dental implant placement of the smokers with the nonsmokers. Smokers have significant thicker supporting mucosal tissues compared with nonsmokers, which may explain inaccuracy due to less stability of the surgical guide or the scanning prosthesis.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>accuracy</topic><topic>biotype</topic><topic>dental implants</topic><topic>guided surgery</topic><topic>smoking</topic><topic>stereolithography</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>ARTICLE</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">1523-0899</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CID</identifier><part><date>2013</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>15</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>3</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>402</start><end>411</end><total>10</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">E3565B15AF4945A2772D182922D865735CDF25BC</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-JSTWXWLS-T</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00353.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CID353</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.© 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E3565B15AF4945A2772D182922D865735CDF25BC/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 007102 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 007102 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:E3565B15AF4945A2772D182922D865735CDF25BC
|texte= Effect of Smoking Habits on Accuracy of Implant Placement Using Mucosally Supported Stereolithographic Surgical Guides
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |