Masticatory function in patients with an extremely resorbed mandible restored with mandibular implant‐retained overdentures: comparison of three types of treatment protocols
Identifieur interne : 006D24 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 006D23; suivant : 006D25Masticatory function in patients with an extremely resorbed mandible restored with mandibular implant‐retained overdentures: comparison of three types of treatment protocols
Auteurs : K. Stellingsma ; A. P. Slagter ; B. Stegenga ; G. M. Raghoebar ; H. J. A. MeijerSource :
- Journal of Oral Rehabilitation [ 0305-182X ] ; 2005-06.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Ability questionnaire, Anova, Blackwell publishing, Complete dentures, Dent, Denture, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Edentulous period, Endosseous, Endosseous implants, Healing phase, Implant, Interforaminal region, Lower denture, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular dentures, Mandibular overdenture, Mandibular overdentures, Masticatory, Masticatory function, Masticatory performance, Masticatory performance test, Maxillofacial prosthetics, Maxillofacial surgery, Median, Median particle size, Oral maxillofac surg, Oral rehabil, Oral rehabilitation, Overdenture, Overdentures, Present study, Prosthet dent, Ranks test, Rating scale, Resorbed, Resorbed mandible, Short endosseous implants, Slagter, Strokes test, Test food, Transmandibular, Transmandibular implant, Treatment groups, University hospital groningen.
- Teeft :
- Ability questionnaire, Anova, Blackwell publishing, Complete dentures, Dent, Denture, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Edentulous period, Endosseous, Endosseous implants, Healing phase, Implant, Interforaminal region, Lower denture, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular dentures, Mandibular overdenture, Mandibular overdentures, Masticatory, Masticatory function, Masticatory performance, Masticatory performance test, Maxillofacial prosthetics, Maxillofacial surgery, Median, Median particle size, Oral maxillofac surg, Oral rehabil, Oral rehabilitation, Overdenture, Overdentures, Present study, Prosthet dent, Ranks test, Rating scale, Resorbed, Resorbed mandible, Short endosseous implants, Slagter, Strokes test, Test food, Transmandibular, Transmandibular implant, Treatment groups, University hospital groningen.
Abstract
summary The objective of the present study was to analyse the effects of implant supported overdentures on masticatory function in patients with an extremely resorbed mandible, and to compare the masticatory function in these patients using three differing types of implant treatment protocols. The mandibular overdentures were retained by a transmandibular implant, by four endosseous implants following augmentation of the mandible, and by four short endosseous implants, respectively. Sixty patients (50 women, 10 men, mean age 59·4 years) were randomly allocated to one of the three treatment groups. Masticatory function was assessed before and after treatment using a questionnaire, a masticatory performance test, and a structured interview. The patient‐based masticatory function improved significantly. Concerning these parameters there were no significant differences between the three groups before and after treatment. A significant difference existed between the three groups for the laboratory‐assessed masticatory function before treatment, but after treatment this difference was no longer significant. From this study it can be concluded that patients with an extremely resorbed mandible and functional complaints of their lower denture report significant improvement in masticatory function after implant‐overdenture treatment. Differences in masticatory function between the three studied modalities were not significant after treatment.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01242.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:DC353FD0A4F371A3CE335CE1B703FC52E4CF1293Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Masticatory function in patients with an extremely resorbed mandible restored with mandibular implant‐retained overdentures: comparison of three types of treatment protocols</title><author><name sortKey="Stellingsma, K" sort="Stellingsma, K" uniqKey="Stellingsma K" first="K." last="Stellingsma">K. Stellingsma</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Slagter, A P" sort="Slagter, A P" uniqKey="Slagter A" first="A. P." last="Slagter">A. P. Slagter</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Function and Centre for Special Dental Care, University Medical Centre St Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Stegenga, B" sort="Stegenga, B" uniqKey="Stegenga B" first="B." last="Stegenga">B. Stegenga</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, G M" sort="Raghoebar, G M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="G. M." last="Raghoebar">G. M. Raghoebar</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Meijer, H J A" sort="Meijer, H J A" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="H. J. A." last="Meijer">H. J. A. Meijer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:DC353FD0A4F371A3CE335CE1B703FC52E4CF1293</idno><date when="2005" year="2005">2005</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01242.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/DC353FD0A4F371A3CE335CE1B703FC52E4CF1293/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">006D24</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">006D24</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Masticatory function in patients with an extremely resorbed mandible restored with mandibular implant‐retained overdentures: comparison of three types of treatment protocols</title><author><name sortKey="Stellingsma, K" sort="Stellingsma, K" uniqKey="Stellingsma K" first="K." last="Stellingsma">K. Stellingsma</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Slagter, A P" sort="Slagter, A P" uniqKey="Slagter A" first="A. P." last="Slagter">A. P. Slagter</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Function and Centre for Special Dental Care, University Medical Centre St Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Stegenga, B" sort="Stegenga, B" uniqKey="Stegenga B" first="B." last="Stegenga">B. Stegenga</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, G M" sort="Raghoebar, G M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="G. M." last="Raghoebar">G. M. Raghoebar</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Meijer, H J A" sort="Meijer, H J A" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="H. J. A." last="Meijer">H. J. A. Meijer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">32</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="403">403</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="410">410</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2005-06">2005-06</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Ability questionnaire</term><term>Anova</term><term>Blackwell publishing</term><term>Complete dentures</term><term>Dent</term><term>Denture</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Edentulous period</term><term>Endosseous</term><term>Endosseous implants</term><term>Healing phase</term><term>Implant</term><term>Interforaminal region</term><term>Lower denture</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular dentures</term><term>Mandibular overdenture</term><term>Mandibular overdentures</term><term>Masticatory</term><term>Masticatory function</term><term>Masticatory performance</term><term>Masticatory performance test</term><term>Maxillofacial prosthetics</term><term>Maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Median</term><term>Median particle size</term><term>Oral maxillofac surg</term><term>Oral rehabil</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Ranks test</term><term>Rating scale</term><term>Resorbed</term><term>Resorbed mandible</term><term>Short endosseous implants</term><term>Slagter</term><term>Strokes test</term><term>Test food</term><term>Transmandibular</term><term>Transmandibular implant</term><term>Treatment groups</term><term>University hospital groningen</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Ability questionnaire</term><term>Anova</term><term>Blackwell publishing</term><term>Complete dentures</term><term>Dent</term><term>Denture</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Edentulous period</term><term>Endosseous</term><term>Endosseous implants</term><term>Healing phase</term><term>Implant</term><term>Interforaminal region</term><term>Lower denture</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular dentures</term><term>Mandibular overdenture</term><term>Mandibular overdentures</term><term>Masticatory</term><term>Masticatory function</term><term>Masticatory performance</term><term>Masticatory performance test</term><term>Maxillofacial prosthetics</term><term>Maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Median</term><term>Median particle size</term><term>Oral maxillofac surg</term><term>Oral rehabil</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Ranks test</term><term>Rating scale</term><term>Resorbed</term><term>Resorbed mandible</term><term>Short endosseous implants</term><term>Slagter</term><term>Strokes test</term><term>Test food</term><term>Transmandibular</term><term>Transmandibular implant</term><term>Treatment groups</term><term>University hospital groningen</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">summary The objective of the present study was to analyse the effects of implant supported overdentures on masticatory function in patients with an extremely resorbed mandible, and to compare the masticatory function in these patients using three differing types of implant treatment protocols. The mandibular overdentures were retained by a transmandibular implant, by four endosseous implants following augmentation of the mandible, and by four short endosseous implants, respectively. Sixty patients (50 women, 10 men, mean age 59·4 years) were randomly allocated to one of the three treatment groups. Masticatory function was assessed before and after treatment using a questionnaire, a masticatory performance test, and a structured interview. The patient‐based masticatory function improved significantly. Concerning these parameters there were no significant differences between the three groups before and after treatment. A significant difference existed between the three groups for the laboratory‐assessed masticatory function before treatment, but after treatment this difference was no longer significant. From this study it can be concluded that patients with an extremely resorbed mandible and functional complaints of their lower denture report significant improvement in masticatory function after implant‐overdenture treatment. Differences in masticatory function between the three studied modalities were not significant after treatment.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>masticatory</json:string><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>masticatory function</json:string><json:string>mandibular</json:string><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>resorbed</json:string><json:string>resorbed mandible</json:string><json:string>overdentures</json:string><json:string>overdenture</json:string><json:string>test food</json:string><json:string>slagter</json:string><json:string>blackwell publishing</json:string><json:string>masticatory performance</json:string><json:string>transmandibular</json:string><json:string>oral rehabilitation</json:string><json:string>endosseous</json:string><json:string>masticatory performance test</json:string><json:string>anova</json:string><json:string>transmandibular implant</json:string><json:string>treatment groups</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>mandibular dentures</json:string><json:string>strokes test</json:string><json:string>mandibular overdentures</json:string><json:string>median particle size</json:string><json:string>lower denture</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string><json:string>median</json:string><json:string>mandibular overdenture</json:string><json:string>interforaminal region</json:string><json:string>oral rehabil</json:string><json:string>endosseous implants</json:string><json:string>ability questionnaire</json:string><json:string>university hospital groningen</json:string><json:string>short endosseous implants</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac surg</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial surgery</json:string><json:string>rating scale</json:string><json:string>ranks test</json:string><json:string>edentulous period</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial prosthetics</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>complete dentures</json:string><json:string>prosthet dent</json:string><json:string>healing phase</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>K. STELLINGSMA</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>A. P. SLAGTER</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral Function and Centre for Special Dental Care, University Medical Centre St Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>B. STEGENGA</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>G. M. RAGHOEBAR</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>H. J. A. MEIJER</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>masticatory function</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental implant</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant‐retained overdenture</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>JOOR1242</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-0QN23P83-P</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>summary The objective of the present study was to analyse the effects of implant supported overdentures on masticatory function in patients with an extremely resorbed mandible, and to compare the masticatory function in these patients using three differing types of implant treatment protocols. The mandibular overdentures were retained by a transmandibular implant, by four endosseous implants following augmentation of the mandible, and by four short endosseous implants, respectively. Sixty patients (50 women, 10 men, mean age 59·4 years) were randomly allocated to one of the three treatment groups. Masticatory function was assessed before and after treatment using a questionnaire, a masticatory performance test, and a structured interview. The patient‐based masticatory function improved significantly. Concerning these parameters there were no significant differences between the three groups before and after treatment. A significant difference existed between the three groups for the laboratory‐assessed masticatory function before treatment, but after treatment this difference was no longer significant. From this study it can be concluded that patients with an extremely resorbed mandible and functional complaints of their lower denture report significant improvement in masticatory function after implant‐overdenture treatment. Differences in masticatory function between the three studied modalities were not significant after treatment.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.58</score><pdfWordCount>4228</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>26753</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>8</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595 x 782 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>196</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1457</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>3</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Masticatory function in patients with an extremely resorbed mandible restored with mandibular implant‐retained overdentures: comparison of three types of treatment protocols</title><pmid><json:string>15899018</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0305-182X</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1365-2842</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JOOR</json:string></publisherId><volume>32</volume><issue>6</issue><pages><first>403</first><last>410</last><total>8</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2005</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>University Hospital Groningen</json:string><json:string>SPSS Inc., Chicago</json:string><json:string>Medical Ethical Committee of the University Hospital Groningen</json:string><json:string>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</json:string><json:string>Laboratory Sieving</json:string><json:string>University Hospital Groningen, Groningen</json:string><json:string>Department of Oral Function and Centre</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>F. Kurt</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Leverkusen</json:string><json:string>Mannheim</json:string><json:string>Gouda</json:string><json:string>Nijmegen</json:string><json:string>Netherlands</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Fontijn-Tekamp et al.</json:string><json:string>Slagter et al.</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-0QN23P83-P</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2005</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2005</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01242.x</json:string></doi><id>DC353FD0A4F371A3CE335CE1B703FC52E4CF1293</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/DC353FD0A4F371A3CE335CE1B703FC52E4CF1293/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/DC353FD0A4F371A3CE335CE1B703FC52E4CF1293/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/DC353FD0A4F371A3CE335CE1B703FC52E4CF1293/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Masticatory function in patients with an extremely resorbed mandible restored with mandibular implant‐retained overdentures: comparison of three types of treatment protocols</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2005-06"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Masticatory function in patients with an extremely resorbed mandible restored with mandibular implant‐retained overdentures: comparison of three types of treatment protocols</title><title level="a" type="short">MASTICATORY FUNCTION WITH IMPLANT‐RETAINED</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">K.</forename><surname>STELLINGSMA</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">A. P.</forename><surname>SLAGTER</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral Function and Centre for Special Dental Care, University Medical Centre St Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands<address><country key="NL"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">B.</forename><surname>STEGENGA</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">G. M.</forename><surname>RAGHOEBAR</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">H. J. A.</forename><surname>MEIJER</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">DC353FD0A4F371A3CE335CE1B703FC52E4CF1293</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-0QN23P83-P</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01242.x</idno><idno type="unit">JOOR1242</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JOOR.JOOR1242.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title><idno type="pISSN">0305-182X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/jor.2005.32.issue-6</idno><idno type="product">JOOR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">32</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="403">403</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="410">410</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2005-06"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p><hi rend="bold"><hi rend="smallCaps">summary</hi>
</hi> The objective of the present study was to analyse the effects of implant supported overdentures on masticatory function in patients with an extremely resorbed mandible, and to compare the masticatory function in these patients using three differing types of implant treatment protocols. The mandibular overdentures were retained by a transmandibular implant, by four endosseous implants following augmentation of the mandible, and by four short endosseous implants, respectively. Sixty patients (50 women, 10 men, mean age 59·4 years) were randomly allocated to one of the three treatment groups. Masticatory function was assessed before and after treatment using a questionnaire, a masticatory performance test, and a structured interview. The patient‐based masticatory function improved significantly. Concerning these parameters there were no significant differences between the three groups before and after treatment. A significant difference existed between the three groups for the laboratory‐assessed masticatory function before treatment, but after treatment this difference was no longer significant. From this study it can be concluded that patients with an extremely resorbed mandible and functional complaints of their lower denture report significant improvement in masticatory function after implant‐overdenture treatment. Differences in masticatory function between the three studied modalities were not significant after treatment.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">masticatory function</term><term xml:id="k2">dental implant</term><term xml:id="k3">implant‐retained overdenture</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/DC353FD0A4F371A3CE335CE1B703FC52E4CF1293/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</doi><issn type="print">0305-182X</issn><issn type="electronic">1365-2842</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JOOR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="06006"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/jor.2005.32.issue-6</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="32">32</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="6">6</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2005-06">June 2005</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="4" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01242.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JOOR1242"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="8"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2005-05-17"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2005-05-17"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-20"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-30"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="403">403</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="410">410</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Dr C. Stellingsma, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
E‐mail: <email>c.stellingsma@kchir.azg.nl</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JOOR.JOOR1242.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted for publication 21 July 2003</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="4"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Masticatory function in patients with an extremely resorbed mandible restored with mandibular implant‐retained overdentures: comparison of three types of treatment protocols</title><title type="shortAuthors">K. STELLINGSMA <i>et al</i>.</title><title type="short">MASTICATORY FUNCTION WITH IMPLANT‐RETAINED</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>K.</givenNames><familyName>STELLINGSMA</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>A. P.</givenNames><familyName>SLAGTER</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>B.</givenNames><familyName>STEGENGA</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>G. M.</givenNames><familyName>RAGHOEBAR</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>H. J. A.</givenNames><familyName>MEIJER</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="NL"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Oral Function and Centre for Special Dental Care, University Medical Centre St Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">masticatory function</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">dental implant</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">implant‐retained overdenture</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><b><sc>summary</sc> </b> The objective of the present study was to analyse the effects of implant supported overdentures on masticatory function in patients with an extremely resorbed mandible, and to compare the masticatory function in these patients using three differing types of implant treatment protocols. The mandibular overdentures were retained by a transmandibular implant, by four endosseous implants following augmentation of the mandible, and by four short endosseous implants, respectively. Sixty patients (50 women, 10 men, mean age 59·4 years) were randomly allocated to one of the three treatment groups. Masticatory function was assessed before and after treatment using a questionnaire, a masticatory performance test, and a structured interview. The patient‐based masticatory function improved significantly. Concerning these parameters there were no significant differences between the three groups before and after treatment. A significant difference existed between the three groups for the laboratory‐assessed masticatory function before treatment, but after treatment this difference was no longer significant. From this study it can be concluded that patients with an extremely resorbed mandible and functional complaints of their lower denture report significant improvement in masticatory function after implant‐overdenture treatment. Differences in masticatory function between the three studied modalities were not significant after treatment.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Masticatory function in patients with an extremely resorbed mandible restored with mandibular implant‐retained overdentures: comparison of three types of treatment protocols</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>MASTICATORY FUNCTION WITH IMPLANT‐RETAINED</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Masticatory function in patients with an extremely resorbed mandible restored with mandibular implant‐retained overdentures: comparison of three types of treatment protocols</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">K.</namePart><namePart type="family">STELLINGSMA</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">A. P.</namePart><namePart type="family">SLAGTER</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral Function and Centre for Special Dental Care, University Medical Centre St Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">B.</namePart><namePart type="family">STEGENGA</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">G. M.</namePart><namePart type="family">RAGHOEBAR</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">H. J. A.</namePart><namePart type="family">MEIJER</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2005-06</dateIssued><edition>Accepted for publication 21 July 2003</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2005</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">0</extent><extent unit="tables">4</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>summary The objective of the present study was to analyse the effects of implant supported overdentures on masticatory function in patients with an extremely resorbed mandible, and to compare the masticatory function in these patients using three differing types of implant treatment protocols. The mandibular overdentures were retained by a transmandibular implant, by four endosseous implants following augmentation of the mandible, and by four short endosseous implants, respectively. Sixty patients (50 women, 10 men, mean age 59·4 years) were randomly allocated to one of the three treatment groups. Masticatory function was assessed before and after treatment using a questionnaire, a masticatory performance test, and a structured interview. The patient‐based masticatory function improved significantly. Concerning these parameters there were no significant differences between the three groups before and after treatment. A significant difference existed between the three groups for the laboratory‐assessed masticatory function before treatment, but after treatment this difference was no longer significant. From this study it can be concluded that patients with an extremely resorbed mandible and functional complaints of their lower denture report significant improvement in masticatory function after implant‐overdenture treatment. Differences in masticatory function between the three studied modalities were not significant after treatment.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>masticatory function</topic><topic>dental implant</topic><topic>implant‐retained overdenture</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0305-182X</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1365-2842</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JOOR</identifier><part><date>2005</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>32</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>6</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>403</start><end>410</end><total>8</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">DC353FD0A4F371A3CE335CE1B703FC52E4CF1293</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-0QN23P83-P</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01242.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JOOR1242</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Science Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/DC353FD0A4F371A3CE335CE1B703FC52E4CF1293/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 006D24 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 006D24 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:DC353FD0A4F371A3CE335CE1B703FC52E4CF1293
|texte= Masticatory function in patients with an extremely resorbed mandible restored with mandibular implant‐retained overdentures: comparison of three types of treatment protocols
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |