Prognosis of implants and fixed restorations after lateral sinus elevation: a literature review
Identifieur interne : 006165 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 006164; suivant : 006166Prognosis of implants and fixed restorations after lateral sinus elevation: a literature review
Auteurs : T. Tuna ; M. Yorgidis ; J. R. StrubSource :
- Journal of Oral Rehabilitation [ 0305-182X ] ; 2012-03.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Allograft, Alloplastic material, Augmentation, Autogenous, Autogenous bone, Blackwell publishing, Bone graft, Bone grafts, Bone height, Bone substitutes, Bovine hydroxyapatite, Clin, Clin periodontol, Clinical outcome, Clinical report, Clinical study, Clinical trials, Dent, Dental implants, Denture, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Elevation, Endosseous, Endosseous implants, Exclusion criteria, Fpd, Graft, Graft material, Graft materials, Grafted, Hallman, Hydroxyapatite, Iliac crest, Implant, Implant failures, Implant placement, Implant survival, Inclusion criteria, Interpore, Intraoral sites, Lateral, Lateral window technique, Lundgren, Maxilla, Maxillary, Maxillary sinus, Maxillary sinus augmentation, Maxillary tuberosity, Maxillofac, Multicentre randomised, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral maxillofac surg, Oral surg, Osseointegrated implants, Osteotome, Osteotome technique, Partial dentures, Peleg, Periodontol, Porous hydroxyapatite, Posterior maxilla, Present review, Primary stability, Prognosis, Prospective study, Prosthetic, Prosthetic loading, Residual, Residual bone height, Restoration, Retrospective, Retrospective study, Sennerby, Simultaneous implant placement, Single crowns, Sinus, Sinus augmentation, Sound conclusions, Splinted, Splinted crowns, Statistical power, Study design, Success rate, Success rates, Success survival rates, Surg, Surgical, Surgical technique, Survival rate, Survival rates, Systematic review.
- Teeft :
- Allograft, Alloplastic material, Augmentation, Autogenous, Autogenous bone, Blackwell publishing, Bone graft, Bone grafts, Bone height, Bone substitutes, Bovine hydroxyapatite, Clin, Clin periodontol, Clinical outcome, Clinical report, Clinical study, Clinical trials, Dent, Dental implants, Denture, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Elevation, Endosseous, Endosseous implants, Exclusion criteria, Fpd, Graft, Graft material, Graft materials, Grafted, Hallman, Hydroxyapatite, Iliac crest, Implant, Implant failures, Implant placement, Implant survival, Inclusion criteria, Interpore, Intraoral sites, Lateral, Lateral window technique, Lundgren, Maxilla, Maxillary, Maxillary sinus, Maxillary sinus augmentation, Maxillary tuberosity, Maxillofac, Multicentre randomised, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral maxillofac surg, Oral surg, Osseointegrated implants, Osteotome, Osteotome technique, Partial dentures, Peleg, Periodontol, Porous hydroxyapatite, Posterior maxilla, Present review, Primary stability, Prognosis, Prospective study, Prosthetic, Prosthetic loading, Residual, Residual bone height, Restoration, Retrospective, Retrospective study, Sennerby, Simultaneous implant placement, Single crowns, Sinus, Sinus augmentation, Sound conclusions, Splinted, Splinted crowns, Statistical power, Study design, Success rate, Success rates, Success survival rates, Surg, Surgical, Surgical technique, Survival rate, Survival rates, Systematic review.
Abstract
Summary Aim of this review was to investigate the prognosis of implants inserted in augmented sinuses and fixed restorations supported by these implants. Special attention was given to the impact of grafting material, time of implant placement, residual bone height and type of fixed restoration. An electronic search in PubMed, the German database medpilot and the Cochrane Library was executed followed by supplementary manual search in relevant journals. The search was limited to human studies published up to November 2010. Only publications in English and German, in peer‐reviewed journals, were considered. After the initial search and application of selection criteria on titles and abstracts, a full‐text analysis of 67 articles was performed, out of which six prospective and three retrospective studies were finally included in the review. The heterogeneous properties of the identified articles did not allow systematic analysis of the data. Success rates of implants were between 96·3% and 100%, survival rates were between 75% and 100%, and survival rates of single crowns, splinted crowns and fixed partial dentures ranged between 96·4% and 100% after a follow‐up of 12–101 months. Within the limits of this review, the prognosis of implants and fixed restorations seemed not to be influenced by the type of restorations, graft material, residual bone height and time of implant placement. However, conclusions of this review are based on studies with low level of evidence; therefore, careful interpretation is required. Multicentre randomised controlled clinical trials with sufficient statistical power concentrating on few factors are needed to reach sound conclusions.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02259.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:C44FE1A9BB5BDE3EF88F52AECE4CFCABA9569EC8Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Prognosis of implants and fixed restorations after lateral sinus elevation: a literature review</title><author><name sortKey="Tuna, T" sort="Tuna, T" uniqKey="Tuna T" first="T." last="Tuna">T. Tuna</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Albert‐Ludwigs‐University, Freiburg</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Yorgidis, M" sort="Yorgidis, M" uniqKey="Yorgidis M" first="M." last="Yorgidis">M. Yorgidis</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Dentistry, Albert‐Ludwigs‐University, Freiburg, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Strub, J R" sort="Strub, J R" uniqKey="Strub J" first="J. R." last="Strub">J. R. Strub</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Albert‐Ludwigs‐University, Freiburg</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:C44FE1A9BB5BDE3EF88F52AECE4CFCABA9569EC8</idno><date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02259.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/C44FE1A9BB5BDE3EF88F52AECE4CFCABA9569EC8/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">006165</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">006165</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Prognosis of implants and fixed restorations after lateral sinus elevation: a literature review</title><author><name sortKey="Tuna, T" sort="Tuna, T" uniqKey="Tuna T" first="T." last="Tuna">T. Tuna</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Albert‐Ludwigs‐University, Freiburg</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Yorgidis, M" sort="Yorgidis, M" uniqKey="Yorgidis M" first="M." last="Yorgidis">M. Yorgidis</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Dentistry, Albert‐Ludwigs‐University, Freiburg, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Strub, J R" sort="Strub, J R" uniqKey="Strub J" first="J. R." last="Strub">J. R. Strub</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Albert‐Ludwigs‐University, Freiburg</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">39</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="226">226</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="238">238</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">12</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-03">2012-03</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Allograft</term><term>Alloplastic material</term><term>Augmentation</term><term>Autogenous</term><term>Autogenous bone</term><term>Blackwell publishing</term><term>Bone graft</term><term>Bone grafts</term><term>Bone height</term><term>Bone substitutes</term><term>Bovine hydroxyapatite</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin periodontol</term><term>Clinical outcome</term><term>Clinical report</term><term>Clinical study</term><term>Clinical trials</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Denture</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Elevation</term><term>Endosseous</term><term>Endosseous implants</term><term>Exclusion criteria</term><term>Fpd</term><term>Graft</term><term>Graft material</term><term>Graft materials</term><term>Grafted</term><term>Hallman</term><term>Hydroxyapatite</term><term>Iliac crest</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failures</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant survival</term><term>Inclusion criteria</term><term>Interpore</term><term>Intraoral sites</term><term>Lateral</term><term>Lateral window technique</term><term>Lundgren</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maxillary sinus</term><term>Maxillary sinus augmentation</term><term>Maxillary tuberosity</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>Multicentre randomised</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Oral maxillofac surg</term><term>Oral surg</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Osteotome</term><term>Osteotome technique</term><term>Partial dentures</term><term>Peleg</term><term>Periodontol</term><term>Porous hydroxyapatite</term><term>Posterior maxilla</term><term>Present review</term><term>Primary stability</term><term>Prognosis</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic loading</term><term>Residual</term><term>Residual bone height</term><term>Restoration</term><term>Retrospective</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Sennerby</term><term>Simultaneous implant placement</term><term>Single crowns</term><term>Sinus</term><term>Sinus augmentation</term><term>Sound conclusions</term><term>Splinted</term><term>Splinted crowns</term><term>Statistical power</term><term>Study design</term><term>Success rate</term><term>Success rates</term><term>Success survival rates</term><term>Surg</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical technique</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Survival rates</term><term>Systematic review</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Allograft</term><term>Alloplastic material</term><term>Augmentation</term><term>Autogenous</term><term>Autogenous bone</term><term>Blackwell publishing</term><term>Bone graft</term><term>Bone grafts</term><term>Bone height</term><term>Bone substitutes</term><term>Bovine hydroxyapatite</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin periodontol</term><term>Clinical outcome</term><term>Clinical report</term><term>Clinical study</term><term>Clinical trials</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Denture</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Elevation</term><term>Endosseous</term><term>Endosseous implants</term><term>Exclusion criteria</term><term>Fpd</term><term>Graft</term><term>Graft material</term><term>Graft materials</term><term>Grafted</term><term>Hallman</term><term>Hydroxyapatite</term><term>Iliac crest</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failures</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant survival</term><term>Inclusion criteria</term><term>Interpore</term><term>Intraoral sites</term><term>Lateral</term><term>Lateral window technique</term><term>Lundgren</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maxillary sinus</term><term>Maxillary sinus augmentation</term><term>Maxillary tuberosity</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>Multicentre randomised</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Oral maxillofac surg</term><term>Oral surg</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Osteotome</term><term>Osteotome technique</term><term>Partial dentures</term><term>Peleg</term><term>Periodontol</term><term>Porous hydroxyapatite</term><term>Posterior maxilla</term><term>Present review</term><term>Primary stability</term><term>Prognosis</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic loading</term><term>Residual</term><term>Residual bone height</term><term>Restoration</term><term>Retrospective</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Sennerby</term><term>Simultaneous implant placement</term><term>Single crowns</term><term>Sinus</term><term>Sinus augmentation</term><term>Sound conclusions</term><term>Splinted</term><term>Splinted crowns</term><term>Statistical power</term><term>Study design</term><term>Success rate</term><term>Success rates</term><term>Success survival rates</term><term>Surg</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical technique</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Survival rates</term><term>Systematic review</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Summary Aim of this review was to investigate the prognosis of implants inserted in augmented sinuses and fixed restorations supported by these implants. Special attention was given to the impact of grafting material, time of implant placement, residual bone height and type of fixed restoration. An electronic search in PubMed, the German database medpilot and the Cochrane Library was executed followed by supplementary manual search in relevant journals. The search was limited to human studies published up to November 2010. Only publications in English and German, in peer‐reviewed journals, were considered. After the initial search and application of selection criteria on titles and abstracts, a full‐text analysis of 67 articles was performed, out of which six prospective and three retrospective studies were finally included in the review. The heterogeneous properties of the identified articles did not allow systematic analysis of the data. Success rates of implants were between 96·3% and 100%, survival rates were between 75% and 100%, and survival rates of single crowns, splinted crowns and fixed partial dentures ranged between 96·4% and 100% after a follow‐up of 12–101 months. Within the limits of this review, the prognosis of implants and fixed restorations seemed not to be influenced by the type of restorations, graft material, residual bone height and time of implant placement. However, conclusions of this review are based on studies with low level of evidence; therefore, careful interpretation is required. Multicentre randomised controlled clinical trials with sufficient statistical power concentrating on few factors are needed to reach sound conclusions.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>sinus</json:string><json:string>maxillofac</json:string><json:string>maxillary</json:string><json:string>augmentation</json:string><json:string>autogenous</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string><json:string>autogenous bone</json:string><json:string>maxillary sinus</json:string><json:string>graft</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>residual bone height</json:string><json:string>maxilla</json:string><json:string>surg</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac surg</json:string><json:string>endosseous</json:string><json:string>prosthetic</json:string><json:string>blackwell publishing</json:string><json:string>residual</json:string><json:string>sinus augmentation</json:string><json:string>survival rates</json:string><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>endosseous implants</json:string><json:string>grafted</json:string><json:string>splinted crowns</json:string><json:string>splinted</json:string><json:string>graft material</json:string><json:string>periodontol</json:string><json:string>fpd</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>hallman</json:string><json:string>hydroxyapatite</json:string><json:string>bone substitutes</json:string><json:string>success rates</json:string><json:string>sennerby</json:string><json:string>allograft</json:string><json:string>peleg</json:string><json:string>lundgren</json:string><json:string>osteotome</json:string><json:string>interpore</json:string><json:string>simultaneous implant placement</json:string><json:string>clinical trials</json:string><json:string>primary stability</json:string><json:string>single crowns</json:string><json:string>prosthetic loading</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>clinical outcome</json:string><json:string>clinical report</json:string><json:string>graft materials</json:string><json:string>systematic review</json:string><json:string>maxillary sinus augmentation</json:string><json:string>surgical</json:string><json:string>lateral</json:string><json:string>retrospective</json:string><json:string>survival rate</json:string><json:string>success survival rates</json:string><json:string>inclusion criteria</json:string><json:string>osteotome technique</json:string><json:string>partial dentures</json:string><json:string>implant survival</json:string><json:string>present review</json:string><json:string>bovine hydroxyapatite</json:string><json:string>oral surg</json:string><json:string>retrospective study</json:string><json:string>elevation</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string><json:string>bone graft</json:string><json:string>intraoral sites</json:string><json:string>iliac crest</json:string><json:string>posterior maxilla</json:string><json:string>implant failures</json:string><json:string>multicentre randomised</json:string><json:string>bone grafts</json:string><json:string>alloplastic material</json:string><json:string>exclusion criteria</json:string><json:string>porous hydroxyapatite</json:string><json:string>clin periodontol</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>maxillary tuberosity</json:string><json:string>success rate</json:string><json:string>statistical power</json:string><json:string>prospective study</json:string><json:string>sound conclusions</json:string><json:string>bone height</json:string><json:string>surgical technique</json:string><json:string>lateral window technique</json:string><json:string>study design</json:string><json:string>clinical study</json:string><json:string>prognosis</json:string><json:string>restoration</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>T. TUNA</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthodontics, Albert‐Ludwigs‐University, Freiburg</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>M. YORGIDIS</name><affiliations><json:string>School of Dentistry, Albert‐Ludwigs‐University, Freiburg, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>J. R. STRUB</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthodontics, Albert‐Ludwigs‐University, Freiburg</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>fixed prosthodontics</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant‐supported fixed restorations</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>crown</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>fixed partial denture</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>oral implant</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>sinus augmentation</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>sinus lift</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>sinus elevation</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>sinus graft</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>JOOR2259</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-TCX2SNMT-B</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>reviewArticle</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Summary Aim of this review was to investigate the prognosis of implants inserted in augmented sinuses and fixed restorations supported by these implants. Special attention was given to the impact of grafting material, time of implant placement, residual bone height and type of fixed restoration. An electronic search in PubMed, the German database medpilot and the Cochrane Library was executed followed by supplementary manual search in relevant journals. The search was limited to human studies published up to November 2010. Only publications in English and German, in peer‐reviewed journals, were considered. After the initial search and application of selection criteria on titles and abstracts, a full‐text analysis of 67 articles was performed, out of which six prospective and three retrospective studies were finally included in the review. The heterogeneous properties of the identified articles did not allow systematic analysis of the data. Success rates of implants were between 96·3% and 100%, survival rates were between 75% and 100%, and survival rates of single crowns, splinted crowns and fixed partial dentures ranged between 96·4% and 100% after a follow‐up of 12–101 months. Within the limits of this review, the prognosis of implants and fixed restorations seemed not to be influenced by the type of restorations, graft material, residual bone height and time of implant placement. However, conclusions of this review are based on studies with low level of evidence; therefore, careful interpretation is required. Multicentre randomised controlled clinical trials with sufficient statistical power concentrating on few factors are needed to reach sound conclusions.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>10</score><pdfWordCount>6607</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>45047</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>13</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>251</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1689</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>9</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Prognosis of implants and fixed restorations after lateral sinus elevation: a literature review</title><pmid><json:string>21972928</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>review-article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0305-182X</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1365-2842</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JOOR</json:string></publisherId><volume>39</volume><issue>3</issue><pages><first>226</first><last>238</last><total>12</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Review Article</value></json:item></subject></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1970</json:string><json:string>2012</json:string><json:string>4352</json:string><json:string>1970s</json:string><json:string>2010</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>University of Miami Bone Bank</json:string><json:string>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</json:string><json:string>Germany SUMMARY Aim</json:string><json:string>Interpore International</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName></persName><placeName><json:string>Los Angeles</json:string><json:string>USA</json:string><json:string>CA</json:string><json:string>Irvine</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Karabuda et al.</json:string><json:string>Lundgren et al.</json:string><json:string>Olson et al.</json:string><json:string>Wannfors et al.</json:string><json:string>van den Bergh et al.</json:string><json:string>Watzek et al.</json:string><json:string>Mangano et al.</json:string><json:string>Krennmair et al.</json:string><json:string>Leick et al.</json:string><json:string>Keller et al.</json:string><json:string>Ferreira et al.</json:string><json:string>Peleg et al.</json:string><json:string>Tetsch et al.</json:string><json:string>Zijderfeld et al.</json:string><json:string>Cordioli et al.</json:string><json:string>Mazor et al.</json:string><json:string>Herzberg et al.</json:string><json:string>Bornstein et al.</json:string><json:string>Kahnberg et al.</json:string><json:string>Wallace et al.</json:string><json:string>Wiltfang et al.</json:string><json:string>Raghoebar et al.</json:string><json:string>Maiorana et al.</json:string><json:string>Rodriguez et al.</json:string><json:string>Minichetti et al.</json:string><json:string>Hallman et al.</json:string><json:string>Garlini et al.</json:string><json:string>Shlomi et al.</json:string><json:string>Cannizaro et al.</json:string><json:string>Valentini et al.</json:string><json:string>Small et al.</json:string><json:string>Kan et al.</json:string><json:string>Khoury et al.</json:string><json:string>Johansson et al.</json:string><json:string>Wheeler et al.</json:string><json:string>Lorenzoni et al.</json:string><json:string>Hising et al.</json:string><json:string>Stricker et al.</json:string><json:string>Bae et al.</json:string><json:string>Ferri et al.</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-TCX2SNMT-B</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2012</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2012</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02259.x</json:string></doi><id>C44FE1A9BB5BDE3EF88F52AECE4CFCABA9569EC8</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/C44FE1A9BB5BDE3EF88F52AECE4CFCABA9569EC8/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/C44FE1A9BB5BDE3EF88F52AECE4CFCABA9569EC8/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/C44FE1A9BB5BDE3EF88F52AECE4CFCABA9569EC8/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Prognosis of implants and fixed restorations after lateral sinus elevation: a literature review</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2012-03"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="review-article" source="reviewArticle" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-L5L7X3NF-P">review-article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="review-article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Prognosis of implants and fixed restorations after lateral sinus elevation: a literature review</title><title level="a" type="short">PROGNOSIS OF FIXED IMPLANT RESTORATIONS</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">T.</forename><surname>TUNA</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Albert‐Ludwigs‐University, Freiburg</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">M.</forename><surname>YORGIDIS</surname></persName><affiliation>School of Dentistry, Albert‐Ludwigs‐University, Freiburg, Germany<address><country key="DE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">J. R.</forename><surname>STRUB</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Albert‐Ludwigs‐University, Freiburg</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">C44FE1A9BB5BDE3EF88F52AECE4CFCABA9569EC8</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-TCX2SNMT-B</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02259.x</idno><idno type="unit">JOOR2259</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JOOR.JOOR2259.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title><idno type="pISSN">0305-182X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/jor.2012.39.issue-3</idno><idno type="product">JOOR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">39</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="226">226</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="238">238</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">12</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-03"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p><hi rend="bold">Summary </hi> Aim of this review was to investigate the prognosis of implants inserted in augmented sinuses and fixed restorations supported by these implants. Special attention was given to the impact of grafting material, time of implant placement, residual bone height and type of fixed restoration. An electronic search in PubMed, the German database medpilot and the Cochrane Library was executed followed by supplementary manual search in relevant journals. The search was limited to human studies published up to November 2010. Only publications in English and German, in peer‐reviewed journals, were considered. After the initial search and application of selection criteria on titles and abstracts, a full‐text analysis of 67 articles was performed, out of which six prospective and three retrospective studies were finally included in the review. The heterogeneous properties of the identified articles did not allow systematic analysis of the data. Success rates of implants were between 96·3% and 100%, survival rates were between 75% and 100%, and survival rates of single crowns, splinted crowns and fixed partial dentures ranged between 96·4% and 100% after a follow‐up of 12–101 months. Within the limits of this review, the prognosis of implants and fixed restorations seemed not to be influenced by the type of restorations, graft material, residual bone height and time of implant placement. However, conclusions of this review are based on studies with low level of evidence; therefore, careful interpretation is required. Multicentre randomised controlled clinical trials with sufficient statistical power concentrating on few factors are needed to reach sound conclusions.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">fixed prosthodontics</term><term xml:id="k2">implant‐supported fixed restorations</term><term xml:id="k3">crown</term><term xml:id="k4">fixed partial denture</term><term xml:id="k5">oral implant</term><term xml:id="k6">sinus augmentation</term><term xml:id="k7">sinus lift</term><term xml:id="k8">sinus elevation</term><term xml:id="k9">sinus graft</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Review Articles</term></keywords><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>Review Article</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/C44FE1A9BB5BDE3EF88F52AECE4CFCABA9569EC8/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</doi><issn type="print">0305-182X</issn><issn type="electronic">1365-2842</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JOOR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="03103"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/jor.2012.39.issue-3</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="39">39</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="3">3</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2012-03">March 2012</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="reviewArticle" position="8" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02259.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JOOR2259"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="12"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Review Articles</title><title type="articleCategory">Review Article</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:3.1.2.1 standalone mode:FullText" date="2012-02-09"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2011-10-06"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2011-10-06"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2012-02-09"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-20"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.3.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-02-25"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="226">226</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="238">238</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo> Taskin Tuna, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Albert‐Ludwigs University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Strasse 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany. E‐mail: <email normalForm="taskin.tuna@uniklinik-freiburg.de">taskin.tuna@uniklinik‐freiburg.de</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JOOR.JOOR2259.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted for publication 6 August 2011</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="2"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Prognosis of implants and fixed restorations after lateral sinus elevation: a literature review</title><title type="shortAuthors">T. TUNA <i>et al.</i></title><title type="short">PROGNOSIS OF FIXED IMPLANT RESTORATIONS</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>T.</givenNames><familyName>TUNA</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>M.</givenNames><familyName>YORGIDIS</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>J. R.</givenNames><familyName>STRUB</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Albert‐Ludwigs‐University, Freiburg</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="DE"><unparsedAffiliation>School of Dentistry, Albert‐Ludwigs‐University, Freiburg, Germany</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">fixed prosthodontics</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">implant‐supported fixed restorations</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">crown</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">fixed partial denture</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">oral implant</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">sinus augmentation</keyword><keyword xml:id="k7">sinus lift</keyword><keyword xml:id="k8">sinus elevation</keyword><keyword xml:id="k9">sinus graft</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><b>Summary </b> Aim of this review was to investigate the prognosis of implants inserted in augmented sinuses and fixed restorations supported by these implants. Special attention was given to the impact of grafting material, time of implant placement, residual bone height and type of fixed restoration. An electronic search in PubMed, the German database medpilot and the Cochrane Library was executed followed by supplementary manual search in relevant journals. The search was limited to human studies published up to November 2010. Only publications in English and German, in peer‐reviewed journals, were considered. After the initial search and application of selection criteria on titles and abstracts, a full‐text analysis of 67 articles was performed, out of which six prospective and three retrospective studies were finally included in the review. The heterogeneous properties of the identified articles did not allow systematic analysis of the data. Success rates of implants were between 96·3% and 100%, survival rates were between 75% and 100%, and survival rates of single crowns, splinted crowns and fixed partial dentures ranged between 96·4% and 100% after a follow‐up of 12–101 months. Within the limits of this review, the prognosis of implants and fixed restorations seemed not to be influenced by the type of restorations, graft material, residual bone height and time of implant placement. However, conclusions of this review are based on studies with low level of evidence; therefore, careful interpretation is required. Multicentre randomised controlled clinical trials with sufficient statistical power concentrating on few factors are needed to reach sound conclusions.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Prognosis of implants and fixed restorations after lateral sinus elevation: a literature review</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>PROGNOSIS OF FIXED IMPLANT RESTORATIONS</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Prognosis of implants and fixed restorations after lateral sinus elevation: a literature review</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">T.</namePart><namePart type="family">TUNA</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Albert‐Ludwigs‐University, Freiburg</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">M.</namePart><namePart type="family">YORGIDIS</namePart><affiliation>School of Dentistry, Albert‐Ludwigs‐University, Freiburg, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">J. R.</namePart><namePart type="family">STRUB</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Albert‐Ludwigs‐University, Freiburg</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="review-article" displayLabel="reviewArticle" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-L5L7X3NF-P">review-article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2012-03</dateIssued><edition>Accepted for publication 6 August 2011</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">0</extent><extent unit="tables">2</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Summary Aim of this review was to investigate the prognosis of implants inserted in augmented sinuses and fixed restorations supported by these implants. Special attention was given to the impact of grafting material, time of implant placement, residual bone height and type of fixed restoration. An electronic search in PubMed, the German database medpilot and the Cochrane Library was executed followed by supplementary manual search in relevant journals. The search was limited to human studies published up to November 2010. Only publications in English and German, in peer‐reviewed journals, were considered. After the initial search and application of selection criteria on titles and abstracts, a full‐text analysis of 67 articles was performed, out of which six prospective and three retrospective studies were finally included in the review. The heterogeneous properties of the identified articles did not allow systematic analysis of the data. Success rates of implants were between 96·3% and 100%, survival rates were between 75% and 100%, and survival rates of single crowns, splinted crowns and fixed partial dentures ranged between 96·4% and 100% after a follow‐up of 12–101 months. Within the limits of this review, the prognosis of implants and fixed restorations seemed not to be influenced by the type of restorations, graft material, residual bone height and time of implant placement. However, conclusions of this review are based on studies with low level of evidence; therefore, careful interpretation is required. Multicentre randomised controlled clinical trials with sufficient statistical power concentrating on few factors are needed to reach sound conclusions.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>fixed prosthodontics</topic><topic>implant‐supported fixed restorations</topic><topic>crown</topic><topic>fixed partial denture</topic><topic>oral implant</topic><topic>sinus augmentation</topic><topic>sinus lift</topic><topic>sinus elevation</topic><topic>sinus graft</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Review Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0305-182X</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1365-2842</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JOOR</identifier><part><date>2012</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>39</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>3</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>226</start><end>238</end><total>12</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">C44FE1A9BB5BDE3EF88F52AECE4CFCABA9569EC8</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-TCX2SNMT-B</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02259.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JOOR2259</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/C44FE1A9BB5BDE3EF88F52AECE4CFCABA9569EC8/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 006165 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 006165 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:C44FE1A9BB5BDE3EF88F52AECE4CFCABA9569EC8
|texte= Prognosis of implants and fixed restorations after lateral sinus elevation: a literature review
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |