Digital image processing. II. In vitro quantitative evaluation of soft and hard peri‐implant tissue changes.
Identifieur interne : 005755 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 005754; suivant : 005756Digital image processing. II. In vitro quantitative evaluation of soft and hard peri‐implant tissue changes.
Auteurs : I. Fourmousis ; U. Br Gger ; W. Bürgin ; M. Tonetti ; N. P. LangSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 1994-06.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of computer‐assisted densitometric image analysis (CADIA) to detect small changes in mineralized and nonmineralized tissues adjacent to dental implants and to correlate these changes with CADIA values. A section of a pig mandible including all soft tissues and in which a hollow cylinder ITI Bonefit® implant with an artificial mesial and a buccal infrabony defect was placed was used to obtain pairs of standardized radiographs. Series of radiographs were obtained with exposure times of 0.13. 0.20, 0.44. and 0.53 s. Specimens of mineralized or nonmineralized tissues were placed arbitrarily in the defects before each radiographic exposure. The radio‐graphs were captured through a video camera, digitized and stored in a personal computer. Every radiographic image was then subtracted from a baseline one without any change. The result of the subtraction was evaluated with CADIA. A linear correlation (r2=0.99) was found between the bone chips (1–5 mg of dry weight) placed in the mesial defect and the CADIA values. Bone chips in the buccal defect (behind the implant), however, were not detected unless their weight reached 14 mg or more. For conventionally exposed radiographs, it was not possible to recognize soft tissue specimens (1–6 mg), either in the buccal or the mesial defect. However, when “underexposed” radiographs (exposure time: 0.13 s) were obtained, a linear correlation (r2=0.80) was calculated for soft tissue specimens in the mesial defect and CADIA values. In normally exposed radiographs. the CADIA system could detect even the smallest change in bone density (bone chip of 1 mg of dry bone weight) and correlated almost linearly with these changes. Provided that the radiographic images are obtained with standardized geometry and normal exposure time. the tissue density changes detected by this system within bone defects represent only mineralized tissue changes. By underexposing radiographs, CADIA may even reveal soft tissue changes around dental implants.
Url:
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050207.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:AF6574293A53E05062503DFA062E322B941AE2F4Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Digital image processing. II. In vitro quantitative evaluation of soft and hard peri‐implant tissue changes.</title><author><name sortKey="Fourmousis, I" sort="Fourmousis, I" uniqKey="Fourmousis I" first="I." last="Fourmousis">I. Fourmousis</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Berne, School of Dental Medicine, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Br Gger, U" sort="Br Gger, U" uniqKey="Br Gger U" first="U." last="Br Gger">U. Br Gger</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Berne, School of Dental Medicine, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Burgin, W" sort="Burgin, W" uniqKey="Burgin W" first="W." last="Bürgin">W. Bürgin</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Berne, School of Dental Medicine, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Tonetti, M" sort="Tonetti, M" uniqKey="Tonetti M" first="M." last="Tonetti">M. Tonetti</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Berne, School of Dental Medicine, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lang, N P" sort="Lang, N P" uniqKey="Lang N" first="N. P." last="Lang">N. P. Lang</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Berne, School of Dental Medicine, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:AF6574293A53E05062503DFA062E322B941AE2F4</idno><date when="1994" year="1994">1994</date><idno type="doi">10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050207.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/AF6574293A53E05062503DFA062E322B941AE2F4/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">005755</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">005755</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Digital image processing. II. In vitro quantitative evaluation of soft and hard peri‐implant tissue changes.</title><author><name sortKey="Fourmousis, I" sort="Fourmousis, I" uniqKey="Fourmousis I" first="I." last="Fourmousis">I. Fourmousis</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Berne, School of Dental Medicine, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Br Gger, U" sort="Br Gger, U" uniqKey="Br Gger U" first="U." last="Br Gger">U. Br Gger</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Berne, School of Dental Medicine, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Burgin, W" sort="Burgin, W" uniqKey="Burgin W" first="W." last="Bürgin">W. Bürgin</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Berne, School of Dental Medicine, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Tonetti, M" sort="Tonetti, M" uniqKey="Tonetti M" first="M." last="Tonetti">M. Tonetti</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Berne, School of Dental Medicine, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lang, N P" sort="Lang, N P" uniqKey="Lang N" first="N. P." last="Lang">N. P. Lang</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Berne, School of Dental Medicine, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="105">105</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="114">114</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1994-06">1994-06</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of computer‐assisted densitometric image analysis (CADIA) to detect small changes in mineralized and nonmineralized tissues adjacent to dental implants and to correlate these changes with CADIA values. A section of a pig mandible including all soft tissues and in which a hollow cylinder ITI Bonefit® implant with an artificial mesial and a buccal infrabony defect was placed was used to obtain pairs of standardized radiographs. Series of radiographs were obtained with exposure times of 0.13. 0.20, 0.44. and 0.53 s. Specimens of mineralized or nonmineralized tissues were placed arbitrarily in the defects before each radiographic exposure. The radio‐graphs were captured through a video camera, digitized and stored in a personal computer. Every radiographic image was then subtracted from a baseline one without any change. The result of the subtraction was evaluated with CADIA. A linear correlation (r2=0.99) was found between the bone chips (1–5 mg of dry weight) placed in the mesial defect and the CADIA values. Bone chips in the buccal defect (behind the implant), however, were not detected unless their weight reached 14 mg or more. For conventionally exposed radiographs, it was not possible to recognize soft tissue specimens (1–6 mg), either in the buccal or the mesial defect. However, when “underexposed” radiographs (exposure time: 0.13 s) were obtained, a linear correlation (r2=0.80) was calculated for soft tissue specimens in the mesial defect and CADIA values. In normally exposed radiographs. the CADIA system could detect even the smallest change in bone density (bone chip of 1 mg of dry bone weight) and correlated almost linearly with these changes. Provided that the radiographic images are obtained with standardized geometry and normal exposure time. the tissue density changes detected by this system within bone defects represent only mineralized tissue changes. By underexposing radiographs, CADIA may even reveal soft tissue changes around dental implants.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>I. Fourmousis</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology and Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Berne, School of Dental Medicine, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>U. Brägger</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology and Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Berne, School of Dental Medicine, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>W. Bürgin</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology and Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Berne, School of Dental Medicine, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>M. Tonetti</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology and Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Berne, School of Dental Medicine, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>N. P. Lang</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology and Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Berne, School of Dental Medicine, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>digital image analysis</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>subtraction radiography</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental implant</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>radiographic diagnosis</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR050207</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-RW0588P1-N</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of computer‐assisted densitometric image analysis (CADIA) to detect small changes in mineralized and nonmineralized tissues adjacent to dental implants and to correlate these changes with CADIA values. A section of a pig mandible including all soft tissues and in which a hollow cylinder ITI Bonefit® implant with an artificial mesial and a buccal infrabony defect was placed was used to obtain pairs of standardized radiographs. Series of radiographs were obtained with exposure times of 0.13. 0.20, 0.44. and 0.53 s. Specimens of mineralized or nonmineralized tissues were placed arbitrarily in the defects before each radiographic exposure. The radio‐graphs were captured through a video camera, digitized and stored in a personal computer. Every radiographic image was then subtracted from a baseline one without any change. The result of the subtraction was evaluated with CADIA. A linear correlation (r2=0.99) was found between the bone chips (1–5 mg of dry weight) placed in the mesial defect and the CADIA values. Bone chips in the buccal defect (behind the implant), however, were not detected unless their weight reached 14 mg or more. For conventionally exposed radiographs, it was not possible to recognize soft tissue specimens (1–6 mg), either in the buccal or the mesial defect. However, when “underexposed” radiographs (exposure time: 0.13 s) were obtained, a linear correlation (r2=0.80) was calculated for soft tissue specimens in the mesial defect and CADIA values. In normally exposed radiographs. the CADIA system could detect even the smallest change in bone density (bone chip of 1 mg of dry bone weight) and correlated almost linearly with these changes. Provided that the radiographic images are obtained with standardized geometry and normal exposure time. the tissue density changes detected by this system within bone defects represent only mineralized tissue changes. By underexposing radiographs, CADIA may even reveal soft tissue changes around dental implants.</abstract><qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>313</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>2042</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>4</keywordCount><score>5.05</score><pdfWordCount>0</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>0</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>10</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>569 x 777 pts</pdfPageSize></qualityIndicators><title>Digital image processing. II. In vitro quantitative evaluation of soft and hard peri‐implant tissue changes.</title><pmid><json:string>7918909</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>5</volume><issue>2</issue><pages><first>105</first><last>114</last></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1994</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName></persName><placeName></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-RW0588P1-N</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string><json:string>4 - traumatismes. maladies dues aux agents physiques</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>1994</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1994</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050207.x</json:string></doi><id>AF6574293A53E05062503DFA062E322B941AE2F4</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/AF6574293A53E05062503DFA062E322B941AE2F4/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>ocr</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/ocr</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/AF6574293A53E05062503DFA062E322B941AE2F4/fulltext/ocr</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/AF6574293A53E05062503DFA062E322B941AE2F4/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/AF6574293A53E05062503DFA062E322B941AE2F4/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Digital image processing. II. In vitro quantitative evaluation of soft and hard peri‐implant tissue changes.</title><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1994-06"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Digital image processing. II. In vitro quantitative evaluation of soft and hard peri‐implant tissue changes.</title><title level="a" type="short">Digital image processing ‐ II</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">I.</forename><surname>Fourmousis</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Berne, School of Dental Medicine, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">U.</forename><surname>Brägger</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Berne, School of Dental Medicine, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">W.</forename><surname>Bürgin</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Berne, School of Dental Medicine, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">M.</forename><surname>Tonetti</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Berne, School of Dental Medicine, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">N. P.</forename><surname>Lang</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Berne, School of Dental Medicine, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">AF6574293A53E05062503DFA062E322B941AE2F4</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-RW0588P1-N</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050207.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLR050207</idno><idno type="supplier"></idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR050207.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.1994.5.issue-2</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="105">105</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="114">114</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1994-06"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p><hi rend="italic">r<hi rend="superscript">2</hi></hi><hi rend="italic">r<hi rend="superscript">2</hi></hi><:t>The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of computer‐assisted densitometric image analysis (CADIA) to detect small changes in mineralized and nonmineralized tissues adjacent to dental implants and to correlate these changes with CADIA values. A section of a pig mandible including all soft tissues and in which a hollow cylinder ITI Bonefit® implant with an artificial mesial and a buccal infrabony defect was placed was used to obtain pairs of standardized radiographs. Series of radiographs were obtained with exposure times of 0.13. 0.20, 0.44. and 0.53 s. Specimens of mineralized or nonmineralized tissues were placed arbitrarily in the defects before each radiographic exposure. The radio‐graphs were captured through a video camera, digitized and stored in a personal computer. Every radiographic image was then subtracted from a baseline one without any change. The result of the subtraction was evaluated with CADIA. A linear correlation (</:t><:t>=0.99) was found between the bone chips (1–5 mg of dry weight) placed in the mesial defect and the CADIA values. Bone chips in the buccal defect (behind the implant), however, were not detected unless their weight reached 14 mg or more. For conventionally exposed radiographs, it was not possible to recognize soft tissue specimens (1–6 mg), either in the buccal or the mesial defect. However, when “underexposed” radiographs (exposure time: 0.13 s) were obtained, a linear correlation (</:t><:t>=0.80) was calculated for soft tissue specimens in the mesial defect and CADIA values. In normally exposed radiographs. the CADIA system could detect even the smallest change in bone density (bone chip of 1 mg of dry bone weight) and correlated almost linearly with these changes. Provided that the radiographic images are obtained with standardized geometry and normal exposure time. the tissue density changes detected by this system within bone defects represent only mineralized tissue changes. By underexposing radiographs, CADIA may even reveal soft tissue changes around dental implants.</:t></p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">digital image analysis</term><term xml:id="k2">subtraction radiography</term><term xml:id="k3">dental implant</term><term xml:id="k4">radiographic diagnosis</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change>undefined</change><change>[object Object]</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/AF6574293A53E05062503DFA062E322B941AE2F4/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley component found"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisherName><publisherLoc>Copenhagen</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="06002"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.1994.5.issue-2</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="5">5</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="2">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="1994-06">June 1994</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0010500" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050207.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR050207"></id><id type="supplier" value=""></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2002-06-27"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2002-06-27"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:Header result:Header" date="2010-03-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="105">105</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="114">114</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Loannis Fourmousis, Department of Periodontology and Fixed Prosthodontics. Freiburgstrasse 7, CH‐3010 Berne, Switzerland</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR050207.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted for publication 21 September 1993</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Digital image processing. II. In vitro quantitative evaluation of soft and hard peri‐implant tissue changes.</title><title type="shortAuthors">Fourmousis et al.</title><title type="short">Digital image processing ‐ II</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>I.</givenNames><familyName>Fourmousis</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>U.</givenNames><familyName>Brägger</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>W.</givenNames><familyName>Bürgin</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>M.</givenNames><familyName>Tonetti</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>N. P.</givenNames><familyName>Lang</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="CH"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Periodontology and Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Berne, School of Dental Medicine, Switzerland</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">digital image analysis</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">subtraction radiography</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">dental implant</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">radiographic diagnosis</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of computer‐assisted densitometric image analysis (CADIA) to detect small changes in mineralized and nonmineralized tissues adjacent to dental implants and to correlate these changes with CADIA values. A section of a pig mandible including all soft tissues and in which a hollow cylinder ITI Bonefit® implant with an artificial mesial and a buccal infrabony defect was placed was used to obtain pairs of standardized radiographs. Series of radiographs were obtained with exposure times of 0.13. 0.20, 0.44. and 0.53 s. Specimens of mineralized or nonmineralized tissues were placed arbitrarily in the defects before each radiographic exposure. The radio‐graphs were captured through a video camera, digitized and stored in a personal computer. Every radiographic image was then subtracted from a baseline one without any change. The result of the subtraction was evaluated with CADIA. A linear correlation (<i>r<sup>2</sup></i>=0.99) was found between the bone chips (1–5 mg of dry weight) placed in the mesial defect and the CADIA values. Bone chips in the buccal defect (behind the implant), however, were not detected unless their weight reached 14 mg or more. For conventionally exposed radiographs, it was not possible to recognize soft tissue specimens (1–6 mg), either in the buccal or the mesial defect. However, when “underexposed” radiographs (exposure time: 0.13 s) were obtained, a linear correlation (<i>r<sup>2</sup></i>=0.80) was calculated for soft tissue specimens in the mesial defect and CADIA values. In normally exposed radiographs. the CADIA system could detect even the smallest change in bone density (bone chip of 1 mg of dry bone weight) and correlated almost linearly with these changes. Provided that the radiographic images are obtained with standardized geometry and normal exposure time. the tissue density changes detected by this system within bone defects represent only mineralized tissue changes. By underexposing radiographs, CADIA may even reveal soft tissue changes around dental implants.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Digital image processing. II. In vitro quantitative evaluation of soft and hard peri‐implant tissue changes.</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Digital image processing ‐ II</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Digital image processing. II. In vitro quantitative evaluation of soft and hard peri‐implant tissue changes.</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">I.</namePart><namePart type="family">Fourmousis</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Berne, School of Dental Medicine, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">U.</namePart><namePart type="family">Brägger</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Berne, School of Dental Medicine, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">W.</namePart><namePart type="family">Bürgin</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Berne, School of Dental Medicine, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">M.</namePart><namePart type="family">Tonetti</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Berne, School of Dental Medicine, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">N. P.</namePart><namePart type="family">Lang</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Berne, School of Dental Medicine, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Copenhagen</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1994-06</dateIssued><edition>Accepted for publication 21 September 1993</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1994</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of computer‐assisted densitometric image analysis (CADIA) to detect small changes in mineralized and nonmineralized tissues adjacent to dental implants and to correlate these changes with CADIA values. A section of a pig mandible including all soft tissues and in which a hollow cylinder ITI Bonefit® implant with an artificial mesial and a buccal infrabony defect was placed was used to obtain pairs of standardized radiographs. Series of radiographs were obtained with exposure times of 0.13. 0.20, 0.44. and 0.53 s. Specimens of mineralized or nonmineralized tissues were placed arbitrarily in the defects before each radiographic exposure. The radio‐graphs were captured through a video camera, digitized and stored in a personal computer. Every radiographic image was then subtracted from a baseline one without any change. The result of the subtraction was evaluated with CADIA. A linear correlation (r2=0.99) was found between the bone chips (1–5 mg of dry weight) placed in the mesial defect and the CADIA values. Bone chips in the buccal defect (behind the implant), however, were not detected unless their weight reached 14 mg or more. For conventionally exposed radiographs, it was not possible to recognize soft tissue specimens (1–6 mg), either in the buccal or the mesial defect. However, when “underexposed” radiographs (exposure time: 0.13 s) were obtained, a linear correlation (r2=0.80) was calculated for soft tissue specimens in the mesial defect and CADIA values. In normally exposed radiographs. the CADIA system could detect even the smallest change in bone density (bone chip of 1 mg of dry bone weight) and correlated almost linearly with these changes. Provided that the radiographic images are obtained with standardized geometry and normal exposure time. the tissue density changes detected by this system within bone defects represent only mineralized tissue changes. By underexposing radiographs, CADIA may even reveal soft tissue changes around dental implants.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>digital image analysis</topic><topic>subtraction radiography</topic><topic>dental implant</topic><topic>radiographic diagnosis</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>1994</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>5</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>105</start><end>114</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">AF6574293A53E05062503DFA062E322B941AE2F4</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-RW0588P1-N</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050207.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR050207</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Munksgaard International Publishers</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/AF6574293A53E05062503DFA062E322B941AE2F4/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005755 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 005755 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:AF6574293A53E05062503DFA062E322B941AE2F4
|texte= Digital image processing. II. In vitro quantitative evaluation of soft and hard peri‐implant tissue changes.
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |