Evidence‐Based Criteria for Differential Treatment Planning of Implant Restorations for the Mandibular Edentulous Patient
Identifieur interne : 005037 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 005036; suivant : 005038Evidence‐Based Criteria for Differential Treatment Planning of Implant Restorations for the Mandibular Edentulous Patient
Auteurs : Steven J. Sadowsky ; Peter W. HansenSource :
- Journal of Prosthodontics [ 1059-941X ] ; 2014-02.
Abstract
Since the introduction of the ad modum Branemark prototype prosthesis for the mandibular edentulous patient more than 30 years ago, design permutations have met clinician and patient considerations. Dental student training and specialist continuing education often rely on anecdotal reports of success to determine the recommended design for patients. Decision‐making algorithms for treatment are optimally predicated on the best available evidence. The purpose of this article is to elucidate the benefit/risk calculus of various implant modalities for the mandibular edentulous patient.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12085
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:A07A33D8AF6508EA1674B93195BE0A27AA667C14Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Evidence‐Based Criteria for Differential Treatment Planning of Implant Restorations for the Mandibular Edentulous Patient</title><author><name sortKey="Sadowsky, Steven J" sort="Sadowsky, Steven J" uniqKey="Sadowsky S" first="Steven J." last="Sadowsky">Steven J. Sadowsky</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Integrated Reconstructive Dental Sciences, University of the Pacific Arthur A. Dugoni School of Dentistry, CA, San Francisco</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: ssadowsky@pacific.edu</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hansen, Peter W" sort="Hansen, Peter W" uniqKey="Hansen P" first="Peter W." last="Hansen">Peter W. Hansen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Integrated Reconstructive Dental Sciences, University of the Pacific Arthur A. Dugoni School of Dentistry, CA, San Francisco</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:A07A33D8AF6508EA1674B93195BE0A27AA667C14</idno><date when="2014" year="2014">2014</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/jopr.12085</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/A07A33D8AF6508EA1674B93195BE0A27AA667C14/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">005037</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">005037</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Evidence‐Based Criteria for Differential Treatment Planning of Implant Restorations for the Mandibular Edentulous Patient</title><author><name sortKey="Sadowsky, Steven J" sort="Sadowsky, Steven J" uniqKey="Sadowsky S" first="Steven J." last="Sadowsky">Steven J. Sadowsky</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Integrated Reconstructive Dental Sciences, University of the Pacific Arthur A. Dugoni School of Dentistry, CA, San Francisco</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: ssadowsky@pacific.edu</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hansen, Peter W" sort="Hansen, Peter W" uniqKey="Hansen P" first="Peter W." last="Hansen">Peter W. Hansen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Integrated Reconstructive Dental Sciences, University of the Pacific Arthur A. Dugoni School of Dentistry, CA, San Francisco</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Prosthodontics</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS</title><idno type="ISSN">1059-941X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1532-849X</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">23</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="104">104</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="111">111</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><date type="published" when="2014-02">2014-02</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1059-941X</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1059-941X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Since the introduction of the ad modum Branemark prototype prosthesis for the mandibular edentulous patient more than 30 years ago, design permutations have met clinician and patient considerations. Dental student training and specialist continuing education often rely on anecdotal reports of success to determine the recommended design for patients. Decision‐making algorithms for treatment are optimally predicated on the best available evidence. The purpose of this article is to elucidate the benefit/risk calculus of various implant modalities for the mandibular edentulous patient.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Steven J. Sadowsky DDS, FACP</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Integrated Reconstructive Dental Sciences, University of the Pacific Arthur A. Dugoni School of Dentistry, CA, San Francisco</json:string><json:string>E-mail: ssadowsky@pacific.edu</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Peter W. Hansen DDS</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Integrated Reconstructive Dental Sciences, University of the Pacific Arthur A. Dugoni School of Dentistry, CA, San Francisco</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>edentulous mandible</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>evidence‐based dentistry</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>JOPR12085</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-V6D3C5H8-S</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Since the introduction of the ad modum Branemark prototype prosthesis for the mandibular edentulous patient more than 30 years ago, design permutations have met clinician and patient considerations. Dental student training and specialist continuing education often rely on anecdotal reports of success to determine the recommended design for patients. Decision‐making algorithms for treatment are optimally predicated on the best available evidence. The purpose of this article is to elucidate the benefit/risk calculus of various implant modalities for the mandibular edentulous patient.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.972</score><pdfWordCount>6439</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>44474</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>8</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.274 x 782.286 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>81</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>588</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>3</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Evidence‐Based Criteria for Differential Treatment Planning of Implant Restorations for the Mandibular Edentulous Patient</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Prosthodontics</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1532-849X</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1059-941X</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1532-849X</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JOPR</json:string></publisherId><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><pages><first>104</first><last>111</last><total>8</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Original Article</value></json:item></subject></host><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-V6D3C5H8-S</json:string></ark><publicationDate>2014</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2014</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/jopr.12085</json:string></doi><id>A07A33D8AF6508EA1674B93195BE0A27AA667C14</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A07A33D8AF6508EA1674B93195BE0A27AA667C14/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A07A33D8AF6508EA1674B93195BE0A27AA667C14/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/A07A33D8AF6508EA1674B93195BE0A27AA667C14/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Evidence‐Based Criteria for Differential Treatment Planning of Implant Restorations for the Mandibular Edentulous Patient</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Wiley Publishing Ltd</publisher><availability><licence>© 2013 by the American College of Prosthodontists</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2014-02"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Evidence‐Based Criteria for Differential Treatment Planning of Implant Restorations for the Mandibular Edentulous Patient</title><title level="a" type="short">Implant Treatment for the Mandibular Edentulous Patient</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Steven J.</forename><surname>Sadowsky</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, FACP</roleName></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Integrated Reconstructive Dental Sciences</orgName><orgName>University of the Pacific Arthur A. Dugoni School of Dentistry</orgName><address><settlement type="city">San Francisco</settlement><region>CA</region></address></affiliation><affiliation>Correspondence Steven J. Sadowsky, University of the Pacific Arthur A. Dugoni School of Dentistry—Integrated Reconstructive Dental Sciences, 2155 Webster St. 400 M, San Francisco, CA 94115. E‐mail: ssadowsky@pacific.edu</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Peter W.</forename><surname>Hansen</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS</roleName></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Integrated Reconstructive Dental Sciences</orgName><orgName>University of the Pacific Arthur A. Dugoni School of Dentistry</orgName><address><settlement type="city">San Francisco</settlement><region>CA</region></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">A07A33D8AF6508EA1674B93195BE0A27AA667C14</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-V6D3C5H8-S</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/jopr.12085</idno><idno type="unit">JOPR12085</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JOPR.JOPR12085.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Prosthodontics</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS</title><idno type="pISSN">1059-941X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1532-849X</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1532-849X</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/jopr.2014.23.issue-2</idno><idno type="product">JOPR</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">23</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="104">104</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="111">111</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><date type="published" when="2014-02"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract style="main"><head>Abstract</head><p>Since the introduction of the ad modum Branemark prototype prosthesis for the mandibular edentulous patient more than 30 years ago, design permutations have met clinician and patient considerations. Dental student training and specialist continuing education often rely on anecdotal reports of success to determine the recommended design for patients. Decision‐making algorithms for treatment are optimally predicated on the best available evidence. The purpose of this article is to elucidate the benefit/risk calculus of various implant modalities for the mandibular edentulous patient.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords><term xml:id="jopr12085-kwd-0001">Implants</term><term xml:id="jopr12085-kwd-0002">edentulous mandible</term><term xml:id="jopr12085-kwd-0003">evidence‐based dentistry</term></keywords><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>Original Article</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en" xml:id="JOPR12085"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1532-849X</doi><issn type="print">1059-941X</issn><issn type="electronic">1532-849X</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JOPR"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS">Journal of Prosthodontics</title><title type="short">Journal of Prosthodontics</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="02102"><doi>10.1111/jopr.2014.23.issue-2</doi><copyright ownership="thirdParty">© 2014 American College of Prosthodontists</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="23">23</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2014-02">February 2014</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" position="50" type="article" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/jopr.12085</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JOPR12085"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="8"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Original Article</title><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="thirdParty">© 2013 by the American College of Prosthodontists</copyright><eventGroup><event type="manuscriptAccepted" date="2013-03-28"></event><event type="xmlCreated" agent="Aptara" date="2013-06-17"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.2.9 mode:FullText" date="2014-02-14"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2013-07-25"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2013-07-25"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2014-02-14"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.6.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-10-08"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">104</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">111</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><b>Correspondence</b> Steven J. Sadowsky, University of the Pacific Arthur A. Dugoni School of Dentistry—Integrated Reconstructive Dental Sciences, 2155 Webster St. 400 M, San Francisco, CA 94115. E‐mail: <email>ssadowsky@pacific.edu</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JOPR.JOPR12085.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><titleGroup><title type="main">Evidence‐Based Criteria for Differential Treatment Planning of Implant Restorations for the Mandibular Edentulous Patient</title><title type="shortAuthors">Sadowsky and Hansen</title><title type="short">Implant Treatment for the Mandibular Edentulous Patient</title></titleGroup><creators><creator xml:id="jopr12085-cr-0001" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#jopr12085-aff-0001" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Steven J.</givenNames><familyName>Sadowsky</familyName><degrees>DDS, FACP</degrees></personName></creator><creator xml:id="jopr12085-cr-0002" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#jopr12085-aff-0001"><personName><givenNames>Peter W.</givenNames><familyName>Hansen</familyName><degrees>DDS</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="jopr12085-aff-0001"><orgDiv>Department of Integrated Reconstructive Dental Sciences</orgDiv><orgName>University of the Pacific Arthur A. Dugoni School of Dentistry</orgName><address><city>San Francisco</city><countryPart>CA</countryPart></address></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup type="author"><keyword xml:id="jopr12085-kwd-0001">Implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="jopr12085-kwd-0002">edentulous mandible</keyword><keyword xml:id="jopr12085-kwd-0003">evidence‐based dentistry</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p>Since the introduction of the ad modum Branemark prototype prosthesis for the mandibular edentulous patient more than 30 years ago, design permutations have met clinician and patient considerations. Dental student training and specialist continuing education often rely on anecdotal reports of success to determine the recommended design for patients. Decision‐making algorithms for treatment are optimally predicated on the best available evidence. The purpose of this article is to elucidate the benefit/risk calculus of various implant modalities for the mandibular edentulous patient.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta><noteGroup><note xml:id="jopr12085-note-0001" numbered="no"><p><i>The authors deny any conflicts of interest</i>.</p></note></noteGroup></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Evidence‐Based Criteria for Differential Treatment Planning of Implant Restorations for the Mandibular Edentulous Patient</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Implant Treatment for the Mandibular Edentulous Patient</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Evidence‐Based Criteria for Differential Treatment Planning of Implant Restorations for the Mandibular Edentulous Patient</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Steven J.</namePart><namePart type="family">Sadowsky</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, FACP</namePart><affiliation>Department of Integrated Reconstructive Dental Sciences, University of the Pacific Arthur A. Dugoni School of Dentistry, CA, San Francisco</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: ssadowsky@pacific.edu</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Peter W.</namePart><namePart type="family">Hansen</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS</namePart><affiliation>Department of Integrated Reconstructive Dental Sciences, University of the Pacific Arthur A. Dugoni School of Dentistry, CA, San Francisco</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2014-02</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2013-06-17</dateCreated><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2013-03-28</dateValid><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2014</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><abstract>Since the introduction of the ad modum Branemark prototype prosthesis for the mandibular edentulous patient more than 30 years ago, design permutations have met clinician and patient considerations. Dental student training and specialist continuing education often rely on anecdotal reports of success to determine the recommended design for patients. Decision‐making algorithms for treatment are optimally predicated on the best available evidence. The purpose of this article is to elucidate the benefit/risk calculus of various implant modalities for the mandibular edentulous patient.</abstract><subject><genre>keywords</genre><topic>Implants</topic><topic>edentulous mandible</topic><topic>evidence‐based dentistry</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Prosthodontics</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Journal of Prosthodontics</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Original Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">1059-941X</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1532-849X</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1532-849X</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JOPR</identifier><part><date>2014</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>23</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>104</start><end>111</end><total>8</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">A07A33D8AF6508EA1674B93195BE0A27AA667C14</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-V6D3C5H8-S</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/jopr.12085</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JOPR12085</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2014 American College of Prosthodontists© 2013 by the American College of Prosthodontists</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A07A33D8AF6508EA1674B93195BE0A27AA667C14/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005037 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 005037 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:A07A33D8AF6508EA1674B93195BE0A27AA667C14
|texte= Evidence‐Based Criteria for Differential Treatment Planning of Implant Restorations for the Mandibular Edentulous Patient
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |