Vertical augmentation with interpositional blocks of anorganic bovine bone vs. 7‐mm‐long implants in posterior mandibles: 1‐year results of a randomized clinical trial
Identifieur interne : 004E52 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 004E51; suivant : 004E53Vertical augmentation with interpositional blocks of anorganic bovine bone vs. 7‐mm‐long implants in posterior mandibles: 1‐year results of a randomized clinical trial
Auteurs : Pietro Felice ; Gerardo Pellegrino ; Luigi Checchi ; Roberto Pistilli ; Marco EspositoSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2010-12.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Alveolar distraction osteogenesis, Anorganic, Augmentation, Augmentation procedure, Augmentation procedures, Autogenous, Autogenous bone, Baseline, Bone height, Bone levels, Bone loss, Bone segment, Cannizzaro, Clin, Clinical trial, Complication, Esposito, European journal, Felice, Graft, Iliac crest, Impl, Implant, Implant failure, Implant failures, Implant loading, Implant placement, Implants research, International journal, Interpositional, Interpositional blocks, Interpositional graft, Intraoral radiographs, John wiley sons, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular canal, Marginal bone levels, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial surgery, Oral impl, Oral implantology, Oral maxillofacial implants, Outcome measures, Pellegrino, Periapical, Periapical radiograph, Posterior mandible, Posterior mandibles, Present investigation, Prospective study, Prosthesis, Provisional prostheses, Radiograph, Randomized, Residual, Residual bone height, Resorbed mandible, Short implant group, Short implants, Stellingsma, Study implants, Surgical, Vertical augmentation, Vertical ridge augmentation.
- Teeft :
- Alveolar distraction osteogenesis, Anorganic, Augmentation, Augmentation procedure, Augmentation procedures, Autogenous, Autogenous bone, Baseline, Bone height, Bone levels, Bone loss, Bone segment, Cannizzaro, Clin, Clinical trial, Complication, Esposito, European journal, Felice, Graft, Iliac crest, Impl, Implant, Implant failure, Implant failures, Implant loading, Implant placement, Implants research, International journal, Interpositional, Interpositional blocks, Interpositional graft, Intraoral radiographs, John wiley sons, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular canal, Marginal bone levels, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial surgery, Oral impl, Oral implantology, Oral maxillofacial implants, Outcome measures, Pellegrino, Periapical, Periapical radiograph, Posterior mandible, Posterior mandibles, Present investigation, Prospective study, Prosthesis, Provisional prostheses, Radiograph, Randomized, Residual, Residual bone height, Resorbed mandible, Short implant group, Short implants, Stellingsma, Study implants, Surgical, Vertical augmentation, Vertical ridge augmentation.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate whether 7‐mm‐long implants could be an alternative to longer implants placed in vertically augmented posterior mandibles.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01966.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:9CD38D735FEF4FA44AD10B7EC8756168C5658004Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Vertical augmentation with interpositional blocks of anorganic bovine bone vs. 7‐mm‐long implants in posterior mandibles: 1‐year results of a randomized clinical trial</title><author><name sortKey="Felice, Pietro" sort="Felice, Pietro" uniqKey="Felice P" first="Pietro" last="Felice">Pietro Felice</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Implantology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pellegrino, Gerardo" sort="Pellegrino, Gerardo" uniqKey="Pellegrino G" first="Gerardo" last="Pellegrino">Gerardo Pellegrino</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Checchi, Luigi" sort="Checchi, Luigi" uniqKey="Checchi L" first="Luigi" last="Checchi">Luigi Checchi</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Implantology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pistilli, Roberto" sort="Pistilli, Roberto" uniqKey="Pistilli R" first="Roberto" last="Pistilli">Roberto Pistilli</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Oral and Maxillofacial Unit, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Esposito, Marco" sort="Esposito, Marco" uniqKey="Esposito M" first="Marco" last="Esposito">Marco Esposito</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Manchester Academic Health Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Biomaterials, The Sahlgrenska Academy, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:9CD38D735FEF4FA44AD10B7EC8756168C5658004</idno><date when="2010" year="2010">2010</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01966.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/9CD38D735FEF4FA44AD10B7EC8756168C5658004/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">004E52</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">004E52</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Vertical augmentation with interpositional blocks of anorganic bovine bone vs. 7‐mm‐long implants in posterior mandibles: 1‐year results of a randomized clinical trial</title><author><name sortKey="Felice, Pietro" sort="Felice, Pietro" uniqKey="Felice P" first="Pietro" last="Felice">Pietro Felice</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Implantology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pellegrino, Gerardo" sort="Pellegrino, Gerardo" uniqKey="Pellegrino G" first="Gerardo" last="Pellegrino">Gerardo Pellegrino</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Checchi, Luigi" sort="Checchi, Luigi" uniqKey="Checchi L" first="Luigi" last="Checchi">Luigi Checchi</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Implantology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pistilli, Roberto" sort="Pistilli, Roberto" uniqKey="Pistilli R" first="Roberto" last="Pistilli">Roberto Pistilli</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Oral and Maxillofacial Unit, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Esposito, Marco" sort="Esposito, Marco" uniqKey="Esposito M" first="Marco" last="Esposito">Marco Esposito</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Manchester Academic Health Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Biomaterials, The Sahlgrenska Academy, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">21</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">12</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1394">1394</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1403">1403</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">10</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-12">2010-12</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar distraction osteogenesis</term><term>Anorganic</term><term>Augmentation</term><term>Augmentation procedure</term><term>Augmentation procedures</term><term>Autogenous</term><term>Autogenous bone</term><term>Baseline</term><term>Bone height</term><term>Bone levels</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone segment</term><term>Cannizzaro</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical trial</term><term>Complication</term><term>Esposito</term><term>European journal</term><term>Felice</term><term>Graft</term><term>Iliac crest</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failure</term><term>Implant failures</term><term>Implant loading</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implants research</term><term>International journal</term><term>Interpositional</term><term>Interpositional blocks</term><term>Interpositional graft</term><term>Intraoral radiographs</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular canal</term><term>Marginal bone levels</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral implantology</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Outcome measures</term><term>Pellegrino</term><term>Periapical</term><term>Periapical radiograph</term><term>Posterior mandible</term><term>Posterior mandibles</term><term>Present investigation</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Provisional prostheses</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Randomized</term><term>Residual</term><term>Residual bone height</term><term>Resorbed mandible</term><term>Short implant group</term><term>Short implants</term><term>Stellingsma</term><term>Study implants</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Vertical augmentation</term><term>Vertical ridge augmentation</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar distraction osteogenesis</term><term>Anorganic</term><term>Augmentation</term><term>Augmentation procedure</term><term>Augmentation procedures</term><term>Autogenous</term><term>Autogenous bone</term><term>Baseline</term><term>Bone height</term><term>Bone levels</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone segment</term><term>Cannizzaro</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical trial</term><term>Complication</term><term>Esposito</term><term>European journal</term><term>Felice</term><term>Graft</term><term>Iliac crest</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failure</term><term>Implant failures</term><term>Implant loading</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implants research</term><term>International journal</term><term>Interpositional</term><term>Interpositional blocks</term><term>Interpositional graft</term><term>Intraoral radiographs</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular canal</term><term>Marginal bone levels</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral implantology</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Outcome measures</term><term>Pellegrino</term><term>Periapical</term><term>Periapical radiograph</term><term>Posterior mandible</term><term>Posterior mandibles</term><term>Present investigation</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Provisional prostheses</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Randomized</term><term>Residual</term><term>Residual bone height</term><term>Resorbed mandible</term><term>Short implant group</term><term>Short implants</term><term>Stellingsma</term><term>Study implants</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Vertical augmentation</term><term>Vertical ridge augmentation</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Objectives: To evaluate whether 7‐mm‐long implants could be an alternative to longer implants placed in vertically augmented posterior mandibles.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>augmentation</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>short implants</json:string><json:string>vertical augmentation</json:string><json:string>radiograph</json:string><json:string>esposito</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>randomized</json:string><json:string>mandibular</json:string><json:string>interpositional</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>periapical</json:string><json:string>short implant group</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons</json:string><json:string>impl</json:string><json:string>oral impl</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial</json:string><json:string>augmentation procedure</json:string><json:string>mandibular canal</json:string><json:string>clinical trial</json:string><json:string>periapical radiograph</json:string><json:string>stellingsma</json:string><json:string>cannizzaro</json:string><json:string>anorganic</json:string><json:string>autogenous</json:string><json:string>pellegrino</json:string><json:string>graft</json:string><json:string>posterior mandible</json:string><json:string>residual bone height</json:string><json:string>marginal bone levels</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>provisional prostheses</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofacial implants</json:string><json:string>european journal</json:string><json:string>oral implantology</json:string><json:string>posterior mandibles</json:string><json:string>baseline</json:string><json:string>surgical</json:string><json:string>iliac crest</json:string><json:string>alveolar distraction osteogenesis</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>implant failure</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>implant failures</json:string><json:string>residual</json:string><json:string>felice</json:string><json:string>present investigation</json:string><json:string>bone segment</json:string><json:string>implant loading</json:string><json:string>autogenous bone</json:string><json:string>bone levels</json:string><json:string>study implants</json:string><json:string>intraoral radiographs</json:string><json:string>prospective study</json:string><json:string>augmentation procedures</json:string><json:string>outcome measures</json:string><json:string>bone height</json:string><json:string>interpositional graft</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial surgery</json:string><json:string>vertical ridge augmentation</json:string><json:string>interpositional blocks</json:string><json:string>resorbed mandible</json:string><json:string>complication</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Pietro Felice</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology and Implantology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Gerardo Pellegrino</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Luigi Checchi</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology and Implantology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Roberto Pistilli</name><affiliations><json:string>Oral and Maxillofacial Unit, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Marco Esposito</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Manchester Academic Health Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK</json:string><json:string>Department of Biomaterials, The Sahlgrenska Academy, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>bone substitute</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>interpositional graft</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>short dental implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>vertical bone augmentation</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR1966</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-9Z7K9DW5-X</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Objectives: To evaluate whether 7‐mm‐long implants could be an alternative to longer implants placed in vertically augmented posterior mandibles.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.228</score><pdfWordCount>5980</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>38428</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>10</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>19</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>145</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>4</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Vertical augmentation with interpositional blocks of anorganic bovine bone vs. 7‐mm‐long implants in posterior mandibles: 1‐year results of a randomized clinical trial</title><pmid><json:string>20678136</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>21</volume><issue>12</issue><pages><first>1394</first><last>1403</last><total>10</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2010</json:string><json:string>from June 2007 to April 2008</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>The International Journal</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Paolo Censi</json:string><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>Martin GmbH</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Genoa</json:string><json:string>Croatia</json:string><json:string>Italy</json:string><json:string>Belgium</json:string></placeName><ref_url><json:string>http://www.consort-statement.org/</json:string></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Stellingsma et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Cannizzaro et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Esposito et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Rosenquist 1994</json:string><json:string>Orsini et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Felice et al. 2008, 2009c</json:string><json:string>Stellingsma et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Fontana et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Cannizzaro et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Felice 2009c</json:string><json:string>Felice 2009a, 2009b, 2009c</json:string><json:string>Renouard & Nisand 2006</json:string><json:string>Merli et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>December 2008</json:string><json:string>Chiapasco et al. 2004, 2007</json:string><json:string>Felice 2009b</json:string><json:string>Felice et al</json:string><json:string>Felice 2009a, 2009b</json:string><json:string>Felice et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Bianchi et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Goene et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Neves et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Felice 2009a</json:string><json:string>Chiapasco et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Stellingsma et al. 2005</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-9Z7K9DW5-X</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2010</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2010</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01966.x</json:string></doi><id>9CD38D735FEF4FA44AD10B7EC8756168C5658004</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9CD38D735FEF4FA44AD10B7EC8756168C5658004/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9CD38D735FEF4FA44AD10B7EC8756168C5658004/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/9CD38D735FEF4FA44AD10B7EC8756168C5658004/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Vertical augmentation with interpositional blocks of anorganic bovine bone vs. 7‐mm‐long implants in posterior mandibles: 1‐year results of a randomized clinical trial</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2010-12"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Vertical augmentation with interpositional blocks of anorganic bovine bone vs. 7‐mm‐long implants in posterior mandibles: 1‐year results of a randomized clinical trial</title><title level="a" type="short">Vertical augmentation vs. 7‐mm‐long implants</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Pietro</forename><surname>Felice</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Implantology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy<address><country key="IT"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Gerardo</forename><surname>Pellegrino</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy<address><country key="IT"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Luigi</forename><surname>Checchi</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Implantology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy<address><country key="IT"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Roberto</forename><surname>Pistilli</surname></persName><affiliation>Oral and Maxillofacial Unit, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy<address><country key="IT"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">Marco</forename><surname>Esposito</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Manchester Academic Health Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK<address><country key="GB"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Department of Biomaterials, The Sahlgrenska Academy, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">9CD38D735FEF4FA44AD10B7EC8756168C5658004</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-9Z7K9DW5-X</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01966.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLR1966</idno><idno type="supplier">1966</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR1966.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2010.21.issue-12</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">21</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">12</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1394">1394</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1403">1403</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">10</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-12"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>Abstract</head><p><hi rend="bold">Objectives: </hi> To evaluate whether 7‐mm‐long implants could be an alternative to longer implants placed in vertically augmented posterior mandibles.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Materials and methods: </hi> Sixty patients with posterior mandibular edentulism with 7–8 mm bone height above the mandibular canal were randomized to either vertical augmentation with anorganic bovine bone blocks and delayed 5‐month placement of ≥10 mm implants or to receive 7‐mm‐long implants. Four months after implant placement, provisional prostheses were delivered, replaced after 4 months, by definitive prostheses. The outcome measures were prosthesis and implant failures, any complications and peri‐implant marginal bone levels. All patients were followed to 1 year after loading.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results: </hi> One patient dropped out from the short implant group. In two augmented mandibles, there was not sufficient bone to place 10‐mm‐long implants possibly because the blocks had broken apart during insertion. One prosthesis could not be placed when planned in the 7 mm group vs. three prostheses in the augmented group, because of early failure of one implant in each patient. Four complications (wound dehiscence) occurred during graft healing in the augmented group vs. none in the 7 mm group. No complications occurred after implant placement. These differences were not statistically significant. One year after loading, patients of both groups lost an average of 1 mm of peri‐implant bone. There no statistically significant differences in bone loss between groups.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusions: </hi> When residual bone height over the mandibular canal is between 7 and 8 mm, 7 mm short implants might be a preferable choice than vertical augmentation, reducing the chair time, expenses and morbidity. These 1‐year preliminary results need to be confirmed by follow‐up of at least 5 years.</p><p>
<hi rend="bold">To cite this article:</hi>
Felice P, Pellegrino G, Checchi L, Pistilli R, Esposito M. Vertical augmentation with interpositional blocks of anorganic bovine bone vs. 7‐mm‐long implants in posterior mandibles: 1‐year results of a randomized clinical trial.
<hi rend="italic">Clin. Oral Impl. Res</hi><hi rend="bold">21</hi>, 2010; 1394–1403.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.01966.x</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">bone substitute</term><term xml:id="k2">interpositional graft</term><term xml:id="k3">short dental implants</term><term xml:id="k4">vertical bone augmentation</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9CD38D735FEF4FA44AD10B7EC8756168C5658004/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="12112"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2010.21.issue-12</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="21">21</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="12">12</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2010-12">December 2010</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="12" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01966.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR1966"></id><id type="supplier" value="1966"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="10"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2010-11-10"></event><event type="publishedOnlineAcceptedOrEarlyUnpaginated" date="2010-07-30"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.25.1 mode:FullText" date="2010-11-10"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2010-11-10"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="1394">1394</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="1403">1403</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><b>Corresponding author:</b>
<i>Marco Esposito</i>, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Manchester Academic Health Centre, The University of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester M15 6FH, UK.
Tel.: +44‐(0)161 2756941
Fax: +44‐(0)161 2756840
e‐mail: <email normalForm="espositomarco@hotmail.com">espositomarco@hotmail.com</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR1966.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory><b>Date:</b> Accepted 26 March 2010</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="7"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="4"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="20"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="7307"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="42"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Vertical augmentation with interpositional blocks of anorganic bovine bone vs. 7‐mm‐long implants in posterior mandibles: 1‐year results of a randomized clinical trial</title><title type="shortAuthors">Felice et al.</title><title type="short">Vertical augmentation vs. 7‐mm‐long implants</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Pietro</givenNames><familyName>Felice</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Gerardo</givenNames><familyName>Pellegrino</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Luigi</givenNames><familyName>Checchi</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Roberto</givenNames><familyName>Pistilli</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a4 #a5"><personName><givenNames>Marco</givenNames><familyName>Esposito</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="IT"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Periodontology and Implantology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="IT"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="IT"><unparsedAffiliation>Oral and Maxillofacial Unit, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a4" countryCode="GB"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Manchester Academic Health Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a5" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Biomaterials, The Sahlgrenska Academy, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">bone substitute</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">interpositional graft</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">short dental implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">vertical bone augmentation</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p><b>Objectives: </b> To evaluate whether 7‐mm‐long implants could be an alternative to longer implants placed in vertically augmented posterior mandibles.</p><p><b>Materials and methods: </b> Sixty patients with posterior mandibular edentulism with 7–8 mm bone height above the mandibular canal were randomized to either vertical augmentation with anorganic bovine bone blocks and delayed 5‐month placement of ≥10 mm implants or to receive 7‐mm‐long implants. Four months after implant placement, provisional prostheses were delivered, replaced after 4 months, by definitive prostheses. The outcome measures were prosthesis and implant failures, any complications and peri‐implant marginal bone levels. All patients were followed to 1 year after loading.</p><p><b>Results: </b> One patient dropped out from the short implant group. In two augmented mandibles, there was not sufficient bone to place 10‐mm‐long implants possibly because the blocks had broken apart during insertion. One prosthesis could not be placed when planned in the 7 mm group vs. three prostheses in the augmented group, because of early failure of one implant in each patient. Four complications (wound dehiscence) occurred during graft healing in the augmented group vs. none in the 7 mm group. No complications occurred after implant placement. These differences were not statistically significant. One year after loading, patients of both groups lost an average of 1 mm of peri‐implant bone. There no statistically significant differences in bone loss between groups.</p><p><b>Conclusions: </b> When residual bone height over the mandibular canal is between 7 and 8 mm, 7 mm short implants might be a preferable choice than vertical augmentation, reducing the chair time, expenses and morbidity. These 1‐year preliminary results need to be confirmed by follow‐up of at least 5 years.</p><p> <b>To cite this article:</b>
Felice P, Pellegrino G, Checchi L, Pistilli R, Esposito M. Vertical augmentation with interpositional blocks of anorganic bovine bone vs. 7‐mm‐long implants in posterior mandibles: 1‐year results of a randomized clinical trial.
<i>Clin. Oral Impl. Res</i><b>21</b>, 2010; 1394–1403.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.01966.x</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Vertical augmentation with interpositional blocks of anorganic bovine bone vs. 7‐mm‐long implants in posterior mandibles: 1‐year results of a randomized clinical trial</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Vertical augmentation vs. 7‐mm‐long implants</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Vertical augmentation with interpositional blocks of anorganic bovine bone vs. 7‐mm‐long implants in posterior mandibles: 1‐year results of a randomized clinical trial</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Pietro</namePart><namePart type="family">Felice</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Implantology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Gerardo</namePart><namePart type="family">Pellegrino</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Luigi</namePart><namePart type="family">Checchi</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Implantology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Roberto</namePart><namePart type="family">Pistilli</namePart><affiliation>Oral and Maxillofacial Unit, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Marco</namePart><namePart type="family">Esposito</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Manchester Academic Health Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK</affiliation><affiliation>Department of Biomaterials, The Sahlgrenska Academy, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2010-12</dateIssued><edition>Date: Accepted 26 March 2010</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">7</extent><extent unit="tables">4</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">20</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">42</extent><extent unit="words">7307</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Objectives: To evaluate whether 7‐mm‐long implants could be an alternative to longer implants placed in vertically augmented posterior mandibles.</abstract><abstract>Materials and methods: Sixty patients with posterior mandibular edentulism with 7–8 mm bone height above the mandibular canal were randomized to either vertical augmentation with anorganic bovine bone blocks and delayed 5‐month placement of ≥10 mm implants or to receive 7‐mm‐long implants. Four months after implant placement, provisional prostheses were delivered, replaced after 4 months, by definitive prostheses. The outcome measures were prosthesis and implant failures, any complications and peri‐implant marginal bone levels. All patients were followed to 1 year after loading.</abstract><abstract>Results: One patient dropped out from the short implant group. In two augmented mandibles, there was not sufficient bone to place 10‐mm‐long implants possibly because the blocks had broken apart during insertion. One prosthesis could not be placed when planned in the 7 mm group vs. three prostheses in the augmented group, because of early failure of one implant in each patient. Four complications (wound dehiscence) occurred during graft healing in the augmented group vs. none in the 7 mm group. No complications occurred after implant placement. These differences were not statistically significant. One year after loading, patients of both groups lost an average of 1 mm of peri‐implant bone. There no statistically significant differences in bone loss between groups.</abstract><abstract>Conclusions: When residual bone height over the mandibular canal is between 7 and 8 mm, 7 mm short implants might be a preferable choice than vertical augmentation, reducing the chair time, expenses and morbidity. These 1‐year preliminary results need to be confirmed by follow‐up of at least 5 years.</abstract><abstract>To cite this article:
Felice P, Pellegrino G, Checchi L, Pistilli R, Esposito M. Vertical augmentation with interpositional blocks of anorganic bovine bone vs. 7‐mm‐long implants in posterior mandibles: 1‐year results of a randomized clinical trial.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res21, 2010; 1394–1403.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.01966.x</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>bone substitute</topic><topic>interpositional graft</topic><topic>short dental implants</topic><topic>vertical bone augmentation</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2010</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>21</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>12</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>1394</start><end>1403</end><total>10</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">9CD38D735FEF4FA44AD10B7EC8756168C5658004</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-9Z7K9DW5-X</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01966.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR1966</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9CD38D735FEF4FA44AD10B7EC8756168C5658004/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004E52 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 004E52 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:9CD38D735FEF4FA44AD10B7EC8756168C5658004
|texte= Vertical augmentation with interpositional blocks of anorganic bovine bone vs. 7‐mm‐long implants in posterior mandibles: 1‐year results of a randomized clinical trial
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |