The Evolution of United States–Mexico Labor Cooperation (1994‐2009): Achievements and Challenges
Identifieur interne : 003403 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 003402; suivant : 003404The Evolution of United States–Mexico Labor Cooperation (1994‐2009): Achievements and Challenges
Auteurs : Kimberly A. Nolan GarcíaSource :
- Politics & Policy [ 1555-5623 ] ; 2011-02.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abascal labor reform proposal, Adjudication process, American agreement, Auto workers, Becerra gelover, Bilateral, Bilateral cooperation, Bilateral relationship, Binational, Binational commission, Bush administration, Canadian participation, Canadian unions, Case name, Chao, Child labor, Civil society, Collective contracts, Communication workers, Consultation, Consultations case, Consultations freedom, Cooperative activities, Cooperative spirit, Cornell university press, Daily labor report, Dispute resolution, Estados unidos, February, Flight attendants, Foreign relations, Formal channels, Free trade, Full review, Gutierrez kirchner, Hemispheric labor policy, Human rights, Ilab, Ilrf, Impartiality, Important effect, Independent unions, Industrial relations, Informal channels, International affairs, International institutions, International labor rights fund, Labor accord, Labor board system, Labor budget overview, Labor cooperation, Labor issues, Labor justice system, Labor laws, Labor ministers, Labor organizer, Labor policy, Labor rights, Labor rights principles, Labor rights protections, Labor rights violations, Labor side agreement, Labor tribunals, Labor tribunals freedom, Labor unions, Labor violations, Latin america, Legal entity, Libre comercio, Ling, Ling groups, Machine workers, Maquila, Maquila solidarity network, Maquila workers, Mexican action network, Mexican counterparts, Mexican labor, Mexican unions, Mexico, Mexico city, Migrant, Migrant workers, Minimum standards, Minimum standards protection, Ministerial, Ministerial agreements, Ministerial consultations, Naalc, Naalc agreement, Naalc institutions, Naalc process, Nafta, Nafta campaigns, Nafta institutions, Naos, Nolan, Nolan garcia, Occupational safety, October, Opposition groups, Other areas, Palacios alcocer, Parallel accord, Policy makers, Politics policy february, Program coordinator, Puebla, Puebla case, Recent breakdown, Recent years, Relaciones exteriores, Rmalc, Safety issues, Safety violations, Security issues, Separate cases, Side agreement, Side agreements, Sindicato mexicano, Social security, Staff lawyer, Staff members, Stps mexico, Technical labor standards, Telephone workers, Trade accord, Trade agreement, Trade agreements, Trade deal, Young cases.
- Teeft :
- Abascal labor reform proposal, Adjudication process, American agreement, Auto workers, Becerra gelover, Bilateral, Bilateral cooperation, Bilateral relationship, Binational, Binational commission, Bush administration, Canadian participation, Canadian unions, Case name, Chao, Child labor, Civil society, Collective contracts, Communication workers, Consultation, Consultations case, Consultations freedom, Cooperative activities, Cooperative spirit, Cornell university press, Daily labor report, Dispute resolution, Estados unidos, February, Flight attendants, Foreign relations, Formal channels, Free trade, Full review, Gutierrez kirchner, Hemispheric labor policy, Human rights, Ilab, Ilrf, Impartiality, Important effect, Independent unions, Industrial relations, Informal channels, International affairs, International institutions, International labor rights fund, Labor accord, Labor board system, Labor budget overview, Labor cooperation, Labor issues, Labor justice system, Labor laws, Labor ministers, Labor organizer, Labor policy, Labor rights, Labor rights principles, Labor rights protections, Labor rights violations, Labor side agreement, Labor tribunals, Labor tribunals freedom, Labor unions, Labor violations, Latin america, Legal entity, Libre comercio, Ling, Ling groups, Machine workers, Maquila, Maquila solidarity network, Maquila workers, Mexican action network, Mexican counterparts, Mexican labor, Mexican unions, Mexico, Mexico city, Migrant, Migrant workers, Minimum standards, Minimum standards protection, Ministerial, Ministerial agreements, Ministerial consultations, Naalc, Naalc agreement, Naalc institutions, Naalc process, Nafta, Nafta campaigns, Nafta institutions, Naos, Nolan, Nolan garcia, Occupational safety, October, Opposition groups, Other areas, Palacios alcocer, Parallel accord, Policy makers, Politics policy february, Program coordinator, Puebla, Puebla case, Recent breakdown, Recent years, Relaciones exteriores, Rmalc, Safety issues, Safety violations, Security issues, Separate cases, Side agreement, Side agreements, Sindicato mexicano, Social security, Staff lawyer, Staff members, Stps mexico, Technical labor standards, Telephone workers, Trade accord, Trade agreement, Trade agreements, Trade deal, Young cases.
Abstract
This article offers an account of cooperation between Mexico and the United States around labor issues from 1994, when the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) labor side agreement first made labor issues relevant to United States–Mexico foreign relations, to the present, where that cooperation has broken down substantially. I offer a panorama of the scope and content of labor cooperation between Mexico and the United States, across both formal channels of representation, such as the NAFTA institutions and bilateral meetings, as well as the informal channels, including those forged by civil society and labor unions across borders. I then provide insight into the erosion of labor cooperation in recent years, discuss the wavering commitment to labor issues across successive administrations in both Mexico and the United States, and speculate as to what impact this may have on U.S.–Mexican relations more broadly. Este artículo ofrece un recuento de la cooperación entre México y los Estados Unidos acerca de temas laborales desde 1994, cuando el acuerdo paralelo del Tratado de Libre Comercio de América del Norte (TLCAN) hizo relevantes por primera vez temas laborales para las relaciones exteriores de ambos países, hasta el presente, cuando la cooperación ha fracasado substancialmente. Ofrezco un panorama del alcance y contenido de la cooperación laboral entre México y los Estados Unidos, a través de tanto canales formales de representación tales como las instituciones del TLCAN y las reuniones bilaterales, como también de canales informales, incluyendo aquellos creados por la sociedad civil y sindicatos a través de las fronteras. Proveo entonces una visión de la erosión de la cooperación laboral en años recientes, discuto el vacilante compromiso en temas laborales a través de las administraciones tanto en México como en los Estados Unidos, y especulo sobre el impacto más amplio que esto puede tener en las relaciones Estados Unidos‐México.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-1346.2010.00284.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:691FD4395DDB6B908CD24A48C72B9D5E4FF90863Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The Evolution of United States–Mexico Labor Cooperation (1994‐2009): Achievements and Challenges</title><author><name sortKey="Nolan Garcia, Kimberly A" sort="Nolan Garcia, Kimberly A" uniqKey="Nolan Garcia K" first="Kimberly A." last="Nolan García">Kimberly A. Nolan García</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (CIDE)</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:691FD4395DDB6B908CD24A48C72B9D5E4FF90863</idno><date when="2011" year="2011">2011</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1747-1346.2010.00284.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/691FD4395DDB6B908CD24A48C72B9D5E4FF90863/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">003403</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">003403</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The Evolution of United States–Mexico Labor Cooperation (1994‐2009): Achievements and Challenges</title><author><name sortKey="Nolan Garcia, Kimberly A" sort="Nolan Garcia, Kimberly A" uniqKey="Nolan Garcia K" first="Kimberly A." last="Nolan García">Kimberly A. Nolan García</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (CIDE)</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Politics & Policy</title><title level="j" type="alt">POLITICS POLICY</title><idno type="ISSN">1555-5623</idno><idno type="eISSN">1747-1346</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">39</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="91">91</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="117">117</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">27</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2011-02">2011-02</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1555-5623</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1555-5623</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abascal labor reform proposal</term><term>Adjudication process</term><term>American agreement</term><term>Auto workers</term><term>Becerra gelover</term><term>Bilateral</term><term>Bilateral cooperation</term><term>Bilateral relationship</term><term>Binational</term><term>Binational commission</term><term>Bush administration</term><term>Canadian participation</term><term>Canadian unions</term><term>Case name</term><term>Chao</term><term>Child labor</term><term>Civil society</term><term>Collective contracts</term><term>Communication workers</term><term>Consultation</term><term>Consultations case</term><term>Consultations freedom</term><term>Cooperative activities</term><term>Cooperative spirit</term><term>Cornell university press</term><term>Daily labor report</term><term>Dispute resolution</term><term>Estados unidos</term><term>February</term><term>Flight attendants</term><term>Foreign relations</term><term>Formal channels</term><term>Free trade</term><term>Full review</term><term>Gutierrez kirchner</term><term>Hemispheric labor policy</term><term>Human rights</term><term>Ilab</term><term>Ilrf</term><term>Impartiality</term><term>Important effect</term><term>Independent unions</term><term>Industrial relations</term><term>Informal channels</term><term>International affairs</term><term>International institutions</term><term>International labor rights fund</term><term>Labor accord</term><term>Labor board system</term><term>Labor budget overview</term><term>Labor cooperation</term><term>Labor issues</term><term>Labor justice system</term><term>Labor laws</term><term>Labor ministers</term><term>Labor organizer</term><term>Labor policy</term><term>Labor rights</term><term>Labor rights principles</term><term>Labor rights protections</term><term>Labor rights violations</term><term>Labor side agreement</term><term>Labor tribunals</term><term>Labor tribunals freedom</term><term>Labor unions</term><term>Labor violations</term><term>Latin america</term><term>Legal entity</term><term>Libre comercio</term><term>Ling</term><term>Ling groups</term><term>Machine workers</term><term>Maquila</term><term>Maquila solidarity network</term><term>Maquila workers</term><term>Mexican action network</term><term>Mexican counterparts</term><term>Mexican labor</term><term>Mexican unions</term><term>Mexico</term><term>Mexico city</term><term>Migrant</term><term>Migrant workers</term><term>Minimum standards</term><term>Minimum standards protection</term><term>Ministerial</term><term>Ministerial agreements</term><term>Ministerial consultations</term><term>Naalc</term><term>Naalc agreement</term><term>Naalc institutions</term><term>Naalc process</term><term>Nafta</term><term>Nafta campaigns</term><term>Nafta institutions</term><term>Naos</term><term>Nolan</term><term>Nolan garcia</term><term>Occupational safety</term><term>October</term><term>Opposition groups</term><term>Other areas</term><term>Palacios alcocer</term><term>Parallel accord</term><term>Policy makers</term><term>Politics policy february</term><term>Program coordinator</term><term>Puebla</term><term>Puebla case</term><term>Recent breakdown</term><term>Recent years</term><term>Relaciones exteriores</term><term>Rmalc</term><term>Safety issues</term><term>Safety violations</term><term>Security issues</term><term>Separate cases</term><term>Side agreement</term><term>Side agreements</term><term>Sindicato mexicano</term><term>Social security</term><term>Staff lawyer</term><term>Staff members</term><term>Stps mexico</term><term>Technical labor standards</term><term>Telephone workers</term><term>Trade accord</term><term>Trade agreement</term><term>Trade agreements</term><term>Trade deal</term><term>Young cases</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abascal labor reform proposal</term><term>Adjudication process</term><term>American agreement</term><term>Auto workers</term><term>Becerra gelover</term><term>Bilateral</term><term>Bilateral cooperation</term><term>Bilateral relationship</term><term>Binational</term><term>Binational commission</term><term>Bush administration</term><term>Canadian participation</term><term>Canadian unions</term><term>Case name</term><term>Chao</term><term>Child labor</term><term>Civil society</term><term>Collective contracts</term><term>Communication workers</term><term>Consultation</term><term>Consultations case</term><term>Consultations freedom</term><term>Cooperative activities</term><term>Cooperative spirit</term><term>Cornell university press</term><term>Daily labor report</term><term>Dispute resolution</term><term>Estados unidos</term><term>February</term><term>Flight attendants</term><term>Foreign relations</term><term>Formal channels</term><term>Free trade</term><term>Full review</term><term>Gutierrez kirchner</term><term>Hemispheric labor policy</term><term>Human rights</term><term>Ilab</term><term>Ilrf</term><term>Impartiality</term><term>Important effect</term><term>Independent unions</term><term>Industrial relations</term><term>Informal channels</term><term>International affairs</term><term>International institutions</term><term>International labor rights fund</term><term>Labor accord</term><term>Labor board system</term><term>Labor budget overview</term><term>Labor cooperation</term><term>Labor issues</term><term>Labor justice system</term><term>Labor laws</term><term>Labor ministers</term><term>Labor organizer</term><term>Labor policy</term><term>Labor rights</term><term>Labor rights principles</term><term>Labor rights protections</term><term>Labor rights violations</term><term>Labor side agreement</term><term>Labor tribunals</term><term>Labor tribunals freedom</term><term>Labor unions</term><term>Labor violations</term><term>Latin america</term><term>Legal entity</term><term>Libre comercio</term><term>Ling</term><term>Ling groups</term><term>Machine workers</term><term>Maquila</term><term>Maquila solidarity network</term><term>Maquila workers</term><term>Mexican action network</term><term>Mexican counterparts</term><term>Mexican labor</term><term>Mexican unions</term><term>Mexico</term><term>Mexico city</term><term>Migrant</term><term>Migrant workers</term><term>Minimum standards</term><term>Minimum standards protection</term><term>Ministerial</term><term>Ministerial agreements</term><term>Ministerial consultations</term><term>Naalc</term><term>Naalc agreement</term><term>Naalc institutions</term><term>Naalc process</term><term>Nafta</term><term>Nafta campaigns</term><term>Nafta institutions</term><term>Naos</term><term>Nolan</term><term>Nolan garcia</term><term>Occupational safety</term><term>October</term><term>Opposition groups</term><term>Other areas</term><term>Palacios alcocer</term><term>Parallel accord</term><term>Policy makers</term><term>Politics policy february</term><term>Program coordinator</term><term>Puebla</term><term>Puebla case</term><term>Recent breakdown</term><term>Recent years</term><term>Relaciones exteriores</term><term>Rmalc</term><term>Safety issues</term><term>Safety violations</term><term>Security issues</term><term>Separate cases</term><term>Side agreement</term><term>Side agreements</term><term>Sindicato mexicano</term><term>Social security</term><term>Staff lawyer</term><term>Staff members</term><term>Stps mexico</term><term>Technical labor standards</term><term>Telephone workers</term><term>Trade accord</term><term>Trade agreement</term><term>Trade agreements</term><term>Trade deal</term><term>Young cases</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This article offers an account of cooperation between Mexico and the United States around labor issues from 1994, when the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) labor side agreement first made labor issues relevant to United States–Mexico foreign relations, to the present, where that cooperation has broken down substantially. I offer a panorama of the scope and content of labor cooperation between Mexico and the United States, across both formal channels of representation, such as the NAFTA institutions and bilateral meetings, as well as the informal channels, including those forged by civil society and labor unions across borders. I then provide insight into the erosion of labor cooperation in recent years, discuss the wavering commitment to labor issues across successive administrations in both Mexico and the United States, and speculate as to what impact this may have on U.S.–Mexican relations more broadly. Este artículo ofrece un recuento de la cooperación entre México y los Estados Unidos acerca de temas laborales desde 1994, cuando el acuerdo paralelo del Tratado de Libre Comercio de América del Norte (TLCAN) hizo relevantes por primera vez temas laborales para las relaciones exteriores de ambos países, hasta el presente, cuando la cooperación ha fracasado substancialmente. Ofrezco un panorama del alcance y contenido de la cooperación laboral entre México y los Estados Unidos, a través de tanto canales formales de representación tales como las instituciones del TLCAN y las reuniones bilaterales, como también de canales informales, incluyendo aquellos creados por la sociedad civil y sindicatos a través de las fronteras. Proveo entonces una visión de la erosión de la cooperación laboral en años recientes, discuto el vacilante compromiso en temas laborales a través de las administraciones tanto en México como en los Estados Unidos, y especulo sobre el impacto más amplio que esto puede tener en las relaciones Estados Unidos‐México.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>naalc</json:string><json:string>labor cooperation</json:string><json:string>nafta</json:string><json:string>labor issues</json:string><json:string>naalc process</json:string><json:string>politics policy february</json:string><json:string>ministerial consultations</json:string><json:string>february</json:string><json:string>trade agreement</json:string><json:string>chao</json:string><json:string>naos</json:string><json:string>minimum standards</json:string><json:string>nolan</json:string><json:string>cooperative activities</json:string><json:string>rmalc</json:string><json:string>ilab</json:string><json:string>october</json:string><json:string>binational</json:string><json:string>mexico city</json:string><json:string>ilrf</json:string><json:string>migrant workers</json:string><json:string>puebla</json:string><json:string>labor rights violations</json:string><json:string>maquila</json:string><json:string>labor rights</json:string><json:string>dispute resolution</json:string><json:string>american agreement</json:string><json:string>ling groups</json:string><json:string>ministerial</json:string><json:string>ling</json:string><json:string>bilateral relationship</json:string><json:string>program coordinator</json:string><json:string>labor tribunals</json:string><json:string>consultations freedom</json:string><json:string>human rights</json:string><json:string>recent years</json:string><json:string>formal channels</json:string><json:string>mexican labor</json:string><json:string>ministerial agreements</json:string><json:string>child labor</json:string><json:string>labor side agreement</json:string><json:string>latin america</json:string><json:string>trade accord</json:string><json:string>bush administration</json:string><json:string>binational commission</json:string><json:string>case name</json:string><json:string>staff members</json:string><json:string>informal channels</json:string><json:string>international labor rights fund</json:string><json:string>nolan garcia</json:string><json:string>mexican unions</json:string><json:string>maquila solidarity network</json:string><json:string>hemispheric labor policy</json:string><json:string>estados unidos</json:string><json:string>naalc agreement</json:string><json:string>side agreement</json:string><json:string>stps mexico</json:string><json:string>independent unions</json:string><json:string>libre comercio</json:string><json:string>social security</json:string><json:string>policy makers</json:string><json:string>labor laws</json:string><json:string>bilateral</json:string><json:string>civil society</json:string><json:string>technical labor standards</json:string><json:string>cornell university press</json:string><json:string>occupational safety</json:string><json:string>safety violations</json:string><json:string>security issues</json:string><json:string>consultations case</json:string><json:string>labor unions</json:string><json:string>mexican action network</json:string><json:string>machine workers</json:string><json:string>free trade</json:string><json:string>communication workers</json:string><json:string>young cases</json:string><json:string>trade deal</json:string><json:string>canadian participation</json:string><json:string>canadian unions</json:string><json:string>full review</json:string><json:string>mexican counterparts</json:string><json:string>labor violations</json:string><json:string>labor rights protections</json:string><json:string>separate cases</json:string><json:string>labor justice system</json:string><json:string>gutierrez kirchner</json:string><json:string>legal entity</json:string><json:string>labor board system</json:string><json:string>labor policy</json:string><json:string>collective contracts</json:string><json:string>palacios alcocer</json:string><json:string>safety issues</json:string><json:string>other areas</json:string><json:string>side agreements</json:string><json:string>industrial relations</json:string><json:string>parallel accord</json:string><json:string>labor accord</json:string><json:string>nafta campaigns</json:string><json:string>recent breakdown</json:string><json:string>important effect</json:string><json:string>nafta institutions</json:string><json:string>opposition groups</json:string><json:string>daily labor report</json:string><json:string>trade agreements</json:string><json:string>puebla case</json:string><json:string>labor organizer</json:string><json:string>staff lawyer</json:string><json:string>sindicato mexicano</json:string><json:string>labor rights principles</json:string><json:string>bilateral cooperation</json:string><json:string>international affairs</json:string><json:string>abascal labor reform proposal</json:string><json:string>cooperative spirit</json:string><json:string>naalc institutions</json:string><json:string>relaciones exteriores</json:string><json:string>foreign relations</json:string><json:string>auto workers</json:string><json:string>telephone workers</json:string><json:string>maquila workers</json:string><json:string>labor ministers</json:string><json:string>minimum standards protection</json:string><json:string>becerra gelover</json:string><json:string>international institutions</json:string><json:string>flight attendants</json:string><json:string>labor tribunals freedom</json:string><json:string>adjudication process</json:string><json:string>labor budget overview</json:string><json:string>impartiality</json:string><json:string>consultation</json:string><json:string>migrant</json:string><json:string>mexico</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>KIMBERLY A. NOLAN GARCÍA</name><affiliations><json:string>Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (CIDE)</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Mexico</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Labor Cooperation</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>North American Free Trade Agreement</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>POLP284</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-8M8R1LPN-D</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>This article offers an account of cooperation between Mexico and the United States around labor issues from 1994, when the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) labor side agreement first made labor issues relevant to United States–Mexico foreign relations, to the present, where that cooperation has broken down substantially. I offer a panorama of the scope and content of labor cooperation between Mexico and the United States, across both formal channels of representation, such as the NAFTA institutions and bilateral meetings, as well as the informal channels, including those forged by civil society and labor unions across borders. I then provide insight into the erosion of labor cooperation in recent years, discuss the wavering commitment to labor issues across successive administrations in both Mexico and the United States, and speculate as to what impact this may have on U.S.–Mexican relations more broadly. Este artículo ofrece un recuento de la cooperación entre México y los Estados Unidos acerca de temas laborales desde 1994, cuando el acuerdo paralelo del Tratado de Libre Comercio de América del Norte (TLCAN) hizo relevantes por primera vez temas laborales para las relaciones exteriores de ambos países, hasta el presente, cuando la cooperación ha fracasado substancialmente. Ofrezco un panorama del alcance y contenido de la cooperación laboral entre México y los Estados Unidos, a través de tanto canales formales de representación tales como las instituciones del TLCAN y las reuniones bilaterales, como también de canales informales, incluyendo aquellos creados por la sociedad civil y sindicatos a través de las fronteras. Proveo entonces una visión de la erosión de la cooperación laboral en años recientes, discuto el vacilante compromiso en temas laborales a través de las administraciones tanto en México como en los Estados Unidos, y especulo sobre el impacto más amplio que esto puede tener en las relaciones Estados Unidos‐México.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>10</score><pdfWordCount>9475</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>60917</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>27</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>504 x 720 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>303</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1973</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>4</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>The Evolution of United States–Mexico Labor Cooperation (1994‐2009): Achievements and Challenges</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Politics & Policy</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1747-1346</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1555-5623</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1747-1346</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>POLP</json:string></publisherId><volume>39</volume><issue>1</issue><pages><first>91</first><last>117</last><total>27</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2009</json:string><json:string>2011</json:string><json:string>2000</json:string><json:string>1981</json:string><json:string>1968</json:string><json:string>2005</json:string><json:string>1997</json:string><json:string>February 2011 1998</json:string><json:string>2001</json:string><json:string>1993</json:string><json:string>2006</json:string><json:string>1998</json:string><json:string>2002</json:string><json:string>1994</json:string><json:string>1999</json:string><json:string>1970s</json:string><json:string>1990</json:string><json:string>From May 1992 to December of 1993</json:string><json:string>2003</json:string><json:string>1995</json:string><json:string>2010</json:string><json:string>2000s</json:string><json:string>1991</json:string><json:string>1980s</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</json:string><json:string>Maquila Solidarity Network (MSN) Coordinator</json:string><json:string>Mexico and Canada</json:string><json:string>Canadian Labour Congress</json:string><json:string>Democratic Party</json:string><json:string>Division of Trade Agreement Administration</json:string><json:string>Senate Finance Committee</json:string><json:string>U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Education and the Workforce</json:string><json:string>United States–Mexico Labor Issues As</json:string><json:string>Heritage Center</json:string><json:string>Canada and Mexico</json:string><json:string>ILRF Organization of Rural Route Carriers, Canadian Union of Postal Workers, National Association of Letter Carriers AFL</json:string><json:string>CAN and US, US</json:string><json:string>Ministry of Work and Social</json:string><json:string>Action Canada Network</json:string><json:string>United States, Mexico, and Canada</json:string><json:string>US Sprint</json:string><json:string>United States, the NAO</json:string><json:string>Policy Studies Organization</json:string><json:string>NAALC</json:string><json:string>Support Committee for Maquila Workers, ILRF, ANAD, Union of Metal Industry Workers</json:string><json:string>United States and Canada</json:string><json:string>Teamsters Canada, Quebec</json:string><json:string>STIMAHCS</json:string><json:string>North American Free Trade Agreement</json:string><json:string>National Administrative Of</json:string><json:string>Sindicato Mexicano de Electricistas (SME)</json:string><json:string>Secretaria de Relaciones Exteriores (SRE)</json:string><json:string>U.S. Department of Labor (DoL)</json:string><json:string>Mexico Freedom</json:string><json:string>House of Representatives</json:string><json:string>BBC News</json:string><json:string>International Labor Education and Research Fund, Greenpeace, the United Auto Workers, the AFL</json:string><json:string>Mexico Mexican</json:string><json:string>Allied-Industrial, Chemical</json:string><json:string>As Congress</json:string><json:string>STATES–MEXICO LABOR COOPERATION</json:string><json:string>Support Committee for Maquila Workers National Worker</json:string><json:string>National Electricity Commission, the Comisión Federal</json:string><json:string>Department of State</json:string><json:string>Bureau of International Labor Affairs</json:string><json:string>Program Coordinator, AFL–CIO Solidarity Center‐Mexico</json:string><json:string>CLC</json:string><json:string>Mexico–United States Binational Commission</json:string><json:string>El Siglo de Torreón</json:string><json:string>National Mobilization</json:string><json:string>Commission for Labor Cooperation</json:string><json:string>Oil, Chemical</json:string><json:string>Sub‐coordinator for Hemispheric Labor Policy, Secretariat for Labor and Social Security</json:string><json:string>Red Mexicana de Acción Frente al Libre Comercio (RMALC)</json:string><json:string>North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation (NAALC)</json:string><json:string>Acting Director of the Committee for Labor Cooperation (CLC)</json:string><json:string>Labor Organizer, Centro de Apoyo al Trabajador (CAT)</json:string><json:string>Means Committee, and Lloyd Bentsen</json:string><json:string>Department of Labor</json:string><json:string>United States–Mexico Labor Cooperation Even</json:string><json:string>and Department of State</json:string><json:string>National Labor Relations Board</json:string><json:string>NAFTA</json:string><json:string>North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation, Mexico, Labor Cooperation, North American Free Trade Agreement</json:string><json:string>U.S. National Administration Office (NAO) Staff Lawyer</json:string><json:string>Mexico City</json:string><json:string>Congress</json:string><json:string>Committee on Education</json:string><json:string>Daily Labor Report</json:string><json:string>International Labor Rights Fund</json:string><json:string>Secretaría del Trabajo y Previsión Social (STPS)</json:string><json:string>United States, Canada, and Mexico</json:string><json:string>Mexico, Federation of Goods and Services</json:string><json:string>American Postal Workers Union</json:string><json:string>Canadian National Administrative Of</json:string><json:string>North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Lara Sáenz</json:string><json:string>H. W. Bush</json:string><json:string>Sandra Polaski</json:string><json:string>Attendants</json:string><json:string>U.S. Chamber</json:string><json:string>Justice Project</json:string><json:string>U.S. DoL</json:string><json:string>Washington Apples</json:string><json:string>Ross Perot</json:string><json:string>Mark Wilson</json:string><json:string>Justice Fund</json:string><json:string>Elaine Chao</json:string><json:string>Issues</json:string><json:string>Mark Knouse</json:string><json:string>Apple Growers</json:string><json:string>Steven Law</json:string><json:string>Panel</json:string><json:string>Clinton Administration</json:string><json:string>Workers</json:string><json:string>McConnell</json:string><json:string>Association</json:string><json:string>Nolan García</json:string><json:string>Knouse</json:string><json:string>Edward Island</json:string><json:string>Dan Rostenkowski</json:string><json:string>Chao</json:string><json:string>George</json:string><json:string>Han Young</json:string><json:string>Undersecretary</json:string><json:string>Declined</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>WOLA</json:string><json:string>SOLEC</json:string><json:string>United States</json:string><json:string>Mexico</json:string><json:string>US</json:string><json:string>Montreal</json:string><json:string>Washington</json:string><json:string>Canada</json:string><json:string>Electricity</json:string><json:string>America</json:string><json:string>DC.</json:string><json:string>York</json:string><json:string>Puebla</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>January 2010</json:string><json:string>US NAO, 1997</json:string><json:string>Singh and Adams 2001</json:string><json:string>Hafner-Burton 2009</json:string><json:string>Rural Mail Carriers US NAO, 1998</json:string><json:string>Sony US NAO, 1994</json:string><json:string>Daily Labor Report 2006</json:string><json:string>Massicotte 2001</json:string><json:string>ITAPSA US NAO, 1997</json:string><json:string>Child Labor US NAO, 1998</json:string><json:string>Finbow 2006</json:string><json:string>General Electric US NAO, 1994</json:string><json:string>SUTSP US NAO, 1996</json:string><json:string>Canada Mc Donald’s US NAO, 1998</json:string><json:string>Stigliani 2000</json:string><json:string>BBC News 2002</json:string><json:string>Buchanan and Chaparro 2008</json:string><json:string>TAESA US NAO, 1999</json:string><json:string>Maxi-Switch US NAO, 1996</json:string><json:string>Cameron and Tomlin 2000</json:string><json:string>Mayer 2002</json:string><json:string>Lara Sáenz 1998</json:string><json:string>Labor Law Reform US NAO, 2005</json:string><json:string>Program Coordinator 2006</json:string><json:string>Becerra Gelover 2004</json:string><json:string>Cheves 2006</json:string><json:string>Mexico Honeywell/ General Electric US NAO, 1994</json:string><json:string>Hovis 1994</json:string><json:string>Stillerman 2003</json:string><json:string>US NAO, 2001</json:string><json:string>Mayer 1998</json:string><json:string>El Siglo de Torreón 2003</json:string><json:string>Kay 2005</json:string><json:string>Hidalgo US NAO, 2005</json:string><json:string>SME US NAO, 2010</json:string><json:string>Weiss 2003</json:string><json:string>International Labor Rights Fund 1995</json:string><json:string>Cook 1997</json:string><json:string>US NAO, 1998</json:string><json:string>Hamilton 2002</json:string><json:string>Pastor and Castañeda 1989</json:string><json:string>Gender US NAO, 1997</json:string><json:string>Coahuila US NAO, 2006</json:string><json:string>US NAO, 2000</json:string><json:string>Moore 2002</json:string><json:string>MSN Coordinator 2005</json:string><json:string>Cases and Resolutions 1994</json:string><json:string>Compa 2001</json:string><json:string>Resolution Puebla US NAO, 2003</json:string><json:string>Yucatán US NAO, 2004</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-8M8R1LPN-D</json:string></ark><categories><wos></wos><scienceMetrix></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>3 - Political Science and International Relations</json:string><json:string>1 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>3 - Sociology and Political Science</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>2011</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2011</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1747-1346.2010.00284.x</json:string></doi><id>691FD4395DDB6B908CD24A48C72B9D5E4FF90863</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/691FD4395DDB6B908CD24A48C72B9D5E4FF90863/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/691FD4395DDB6B908CD24A48C72B9D5E4FF90863/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/691FD4395DDB6B908CD24A48C72B9D5E4FF90863/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">The Evolution of United States–Mexico Labor Cooperation (1994‐2009): Achievements and Challenges</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace><availability><licence>© The Policy Studies Organization</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2011-02"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The Evolution of United States–Mexico Labor Cooperation (1994‐2009): Achievements and Challenges</title><title level="a" type="short">Nolan García / UNITED STATES–MEXICO LABOR COOPERATION</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">KIMBERLY A.</forename><surname>NOLAN GARCÍA</surname></persName><affiliation>Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (CIDE)</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">691FD4395DDB6B908CD24A48C72B9D5E4FF90863</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-8M8R1LPN-D</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1747-1346.2010.00284.x</idno><idno type="unit">POLP284</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:POLP.POLP284.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Politics & Policy</title><title level="j" type="alt">POLITICS POLICY</title><idno type="pISSN">1555-5623</idno><idno type="eISSN">1747-1346</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1747-1346</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/polp.2011.39.issue-1</idno><idno type="product">POLP</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">39</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="91">91</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="117">117</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">27</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2011-02"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p>This article offers an account of cooperation between Mexico and the United States around labor issues from 1994, when the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) labor side agreement first made labor issues relevant to United States–Mexico foreign relations, to the present, where that cooperation has broken down substantially. I offer a panorama of the scope and content of labor cooperation between Mexico and the United States, across both formal channels of representation, such as the NAFTA institutions and bilateral meetings, as well as the informal channels, including those forged by civil society and labor unions across borders. I then provide insight into the erosion of labor cooperation in recent years, discuss the wavering commitment to labor issues across successive administrations in both Mexico and the United States, and speculate as to what impact this may have on U.S.–Mexican relations more broadly.</p><p>Este artículo ofrece un recuento de la cooperación entre México y los Estados Unidos acerca de temas laborales desde 1994, cuando el acuerdo paralelo del Tratado de Libre Comercio de América del Norte (TLCAN) hizo relevantes por primera vez temas laborales para las relaciones exteriores de ambos países, hasta el presente, cuando la cooperación ha fracasado substancialmente. Ofrezco un panorama del alcance y contenido de la cooperación laboral entre México y los Estados Unidos, a través de tanto canales formales de representación tales como las instituciones del TLCAN y las reuniones bilaterales, como también de canales informales, incluyendo aquellos creados por la sociedad civil y sindicatos a través de las fronteras. Proveo entonces una visión de la erosión de la cooperación laboral en años recientes, discuto el vacilante compromiso en temas laborales a través de las administraciones tanto en México como en los Estados Unidos, y especulo sobre el impacto más amplio que esto puede tener en las relaciones Estados Unidos‐México.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation</term><term xml:id="k2">Mexico</term><term xml:id="k3">Labor Cooperation</term><term xml:id="k4">North American Free Trade Agreement</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/691FD4395DDB6B908CD24A48C72B9D5E4FF90863/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisherName><publisherLoc>Malden, USA</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1747-1346</doi><issn type="print">1555-5623</issn><issn type="electronic">1747-1346</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="POLP"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="POLITICS POLICY">Politics & Policy</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="02101"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/polp.2011.39.issue-1</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="39">39</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="1">1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2011-02">February 2011</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="6" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1747-1346.2010.00284.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="POLP284"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="27"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright>© The Policy Studies Organization</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.4.7 mode:FullText" date="2011-02-22"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2011-02-22"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2011-02-22"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-02-07"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-11-03"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="91">91</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="117">117</numbering></numberingGroup><objectNameGroup><objectName elementName="appendix">Appendix</objectName></objectNameGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:POLP.POLP284.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="1"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="52"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="9763"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">The Evolution of United States–Mexico Labor Cooperation (1994‐2009): Achievements and Challenges</title><title type="shortAuthors">POLITICS & POLICY / February 2011</title><title type="short">Nolan García / UNITED STATES–MEXICO LABOR COOPERATION</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>KIMBERLY A.</givenNames><familyName>NOLAN GARCÍA</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation>Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (CIDE)</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">Mexico</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">Labor Cooperation</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">North American Free Trade Agreement</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>This article offers an account of cooperation between Mexico and the United States around labor issues from 1994, when the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) labor side agreement first made labor issues relevant to United States–Mexico foreign relations, to the present, where that cooperation has broken down substantially. I offer a panorama of the scope and content of labor cooperation between Mexico and the United States, across both formal channels of representation, such as the NAFTA institutions and bilateral meetings, as well as the informal channels, including those forged by civil society and labor unions across borders. I then provide insight into the erosion of labor cooperation in recent years, discuss the wavering commitment to labor issues across successive administrations in both Mexico and the United States, and speculate as to what impact this may have on U.S.–Mexican relations more broadly.</p><p>Este artículo ofrece un recuento de la cooperación entre México y los Estados Unidos acerca de temas laborales desde 1994, cuando el acuerdo paralelo del Tratado de Libre Comercio de América del Norte (TLCAN) hizo relevantes por primera vez temas laborales para las relaciones exteriores de ambos países, hasta el presente, cuando la cooperación ha fracasado substancialmente. Ofrezco un panorama del alcance y contenido de la cooperación laboral entre México y los Estados Unidos, a través de tanto canales formales de representación tales como las instituciones del TLCAN y las reuniones bilaterales, como también de canales informales, incluyendo aquellos creados por la sociedad civil y sindicatos a través de las fronteras. Proveo entonces una visión de la erosión de la cooperación laboral en años recientes, discuto el vacilante compromiso en temas laborales a través de las administraciones tanto en México como en los Estados Unidos, y especulo sobre el impacto más amplio que esto puede tener en las relaciones Estados Unidos‐México.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>The Evolution of United States–Mexico Labor Cooperation (1994‐2009): Achievements and Challenges</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Nolan García / UNITED STATES–MEXICO LABOR COOPERATION</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>The Evolution of United States–Mexico Labor Cooperation (1994‐2009): Achievements and Challenges</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">KIMBERLY A.</namePart><namePart type="family">NOLAN GARCÍA</namePart><affiliation>Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (CIDE)</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Malden, USA</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2011-02</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">0</extent><extent unit="tables">1</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">52</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent><extent unit="words">9763</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">This article offers an account of cooperation between Mexico and the United States around labor issues from 1994, when the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) labor side agreement first made labor issues relevant to United States–Mexico foreign relations, to the present, where that cooperation has broken down substantially. I offer a panorama of the scope and content of labor cooperation between Mexico and the United States, across both formal channels of representation, such as the NAFTA institutions and bilateral meetings, as well as the informal channels, including those forged by civil society and labor unions across borders. I then provide insight into the erosion of labor cooperation in recent years, discuss the wavering commitment to labor issues across successive administrations in both Mexico and the United States, and speculate as to what impact this may have on U.S.–Mexican relations more broadly. Este artículo ofrece un recuento de la cooperación entre México y los Estados Unidos acerca de temas laborales desde 1994, cuando el acuerdo paralelo del Tratado de Libre Comercio de América del Norte (TLCAN) hizo relevantes por primera vez temas laborales para las relaciones exteriores de ambos países, hasta el presente, cuando la cooperación ha fracasado substancialmente. Ofrezco un panorama del alcance y contenido de la cooperación laboral entre México y los Estados Unidos, a través de tanto canales formales de representación tales como las instituciones del TLCAN y las reuniones bilaterales, como también de canales informales, incluyendo aquellos creados por la sociedad civil y sindicatos a través de las fronteras. Proveo entonces una visión de la erosión de la cooperación laboral en años recientes, discuto el vacilante compromiso en temas laborales a través de las administraciones tanto en México como en los Estados Unidos, y especulo sobre el impacto más amplio que esto puede tener en las relaciones Estados Unidos‐México.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation</topic><topic>Mexico</topic><topic>Labor Cooperation</topic><topic>North American Free Trade Agreement</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Politics & Policy</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1555-5623</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1747-1346</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1747-1346</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">POLP</identifier><part><date>2011</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>39</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>91</start><end>117</end><total>27</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">691FD4395DDB6B908CD24A48C72B9D5E4FF90863</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-8M8R1LPN-D</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1747-1346.2010.00284.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">POLP284</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© The Policy Studies Organization</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Inc</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/691FD4395DDB6B908CD24A48C72B9D5E4FF90863/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003403 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003403 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:691FD4395DDB6B908CD24A48C72B9D5E4FF90863
|texte= The Evolution of United States–Mexico Labor Cooperation (1994‐2009): Achievements and Challenges
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |