An RCT comparing patient‐centred outcome variables of guided surgery (bone or mucosa supported) with conventional implant placement
Identifieur interne : 002B39 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 002B38; suivant : 002B40An RCT comparing patient‐centred outcome variables of guided surgery (bone or mucosa supported) with conventional implant placement
Auteurs : Marjolein Vercruyssen ; Antoon De Laat ; Wim Coucke ; Marc QuirynenSource :
- Journal of Clinical Periodontology [ 0303-6979 ] ; 2014-07.
Abstract
To assess in a randomized study the patient‐centred outcome of two guided surgery systems (mucosa or bone supported) compared to conventional implant placement, in fully edentulous patients.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12257
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:5826FE6F4D35BA5AD1429A8F803B12A3518AF1E1Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">An RCT comparing patient‐centred outcome variables of guided surgery (bone or mucosa supported) with conventional implant placement</title><author><name sortKey="Vercruyssen, Marjolein" sort="Vercruyssen, Marjolein" uniqKey="Vercruyssen M" first="Marjolein" last="Vercruyssen">Marjolein Vercruyssen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Address:KULeuvenE‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: marjolein.vercruyssen@uzleuven.be</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Laat, Antoon" sort="De Laat, Antoon" uniqKey="De Laat A" first="Antoon" last="De Laat">Antoon De Laat</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Coucke, Wim" sort="Coucke, Wim" uniqKey="Coucke W" first="Wim" last="Coucke">Wim Coucke</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Clinical Biology, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, Marc" sort="Quirynen, Marc" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="Marc" last="Quirynen">Marc Quirynen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:5826FE6F4D35BA5AD1429A8F803B12A3518AF1E1</idno><date when="2014" year="2014">2014</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/jcpe.12257</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/5826FE6F4D35BA5AD1429A8F803B12A3518AF1E1/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002B39</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002B39</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">An <hi rend="fc">RCT</hi> comparing patient‐centred outcome variables of guided surgery (bone or mucosa supported) with conventional implant placement</title><author><name sortKey="Vercruyssen, Marjolein" sort="Vercruyssen, Marjolein" uniqKey="Vercruyssen M" first="Marjolein" last="Vercruyssen">Marjolein Vercruyssen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Address:KULeuvenE‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: marjolein.vercruyssen@uzleuven.be</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Laat, Antoon" sort="De Laat, Antoon" uniqKey="De Laat A" first="Antoon" last="De Laat">Antoon De Laat</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Coucke, Wim" sort="Coucke, Wim" uniqKey="Coucke W" first="Wim" last="Coucke">Wim Coucke</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Clinical Biology, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, Marc" sort="Quirynen, Marc" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="Marc" last="Quirynen">Marc Quirynen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY</title><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-051X</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">41</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">7</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="724">724</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="732">732</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><date type="published" when="2014-07">2014-07</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">To assess in a randomized study the patient‐centred outcome of two guided surgery systems (mucosa or bone supported) compared to conventional implant placement, in fully edentulous patients.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Marjolein Vercruyssen</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string><json:string>Address:KULeuvenE‐mail:</json:string><json:string>E-mail: marjolein.vercruyssen@uzleuven.be</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Antoon De Laat</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Wim Coucke</name><affiliations><json:string>Clinical Biology, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Marc Quirynen</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>flapless surgery</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>guided surgery</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>patient outcome</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>quality of life</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>JCPE12257</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-STBK6BLR-2</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>To assess in a randomized study the patient‐centred outcome of two guided surgery systems (mucosa or bone supported) compared to conventional implant placement, in fully edentulous patients.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.324</score><pdfWordCount>5639</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>37865</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>9</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>27</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>190</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>4</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>An RCT comparing patient‐centred outcome variables of guided surgery (bone or mucosa supported) with conventional implant placement</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0303-6979</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-051X</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JCPE</json:string></publisherId><volume>41</volume><issue>7</issue><pages><first>724</first><last>732</last><total>9</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Original Article</value></json:item></subject></host><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-STBK6BLR-2</json:string></ark><publicationDate>2014</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2014</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/jcpe.12257</json:string></doi><id>5826FE6F4D35BA5AD1429A8F803B12A3518AF1E1</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5826FE6F4D35BA5AD1429A8F803B12A3518AF1E1/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5826FE6F4D35BA5AD1429A8F803B12A3518AF1E1/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/5826FE6F4D35BA5AD1429A8F803B12A3518AF1E1/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">An <hi rend="fc">RCT</hi> comparing patient‐centred outcome variables of guided surgery (bone or mucosa supported) with conventional implant placement</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Wiley Publishing Ltd</publisher><availability><licence>© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2014-07"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">An <hi rend="fc">RCT</hi> comparing patient‐centred outcome variables of guided surgery (bone or mucosa supported) with conventional implant placement</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Marjolein</forename><surname>Vercruyssen</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Periodontology</orgName><orgName>Faculty of Medicine</orgName><orgName>Catholic University Leuven</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Leuven</settlement><country key="BE">Belgium</country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Address: Marjolein Vercruyssen KULeuven School of dentistry, oral pathology and maxillofacial surgery Department of periodontology Kapucijnenvoer 33 3000 Leuven Belgium E‐mail: marjolein.vercruyssen@uzleuven.be</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Antoon</forename><surname>De Laat</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</orgName><orgName>Faculty of Medicine</orgName><orgName>Catholic University Leuven</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Leuven</settlement><country key="BE">Belgium</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Wim</forename><surname>Coucke</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Clinical Biology</orgName><orgName>Scientific Institute of Public Health</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Brussels</settlement><country key="BE">Belgium</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Marc</forename><surname>Quirynen</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Periodontology</orgName><orgName>Faculty of Medicine</orgName><orgName>Catholic University Leuven</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Leuven</settlement><country key="BE">Belgium</country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">5826FE6F4D35BA5AD1429A8F803B12A3518AF1E1</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-STBK6BLR-2</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/jcpe.12257</idno><idno type="unit">JCPE12257</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JCPE.JCPE12257.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY</title><idno type="pISSN">0303-6979</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-051X</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/jcpe.2014.41.issue-7</idno><idno type="product">JCPE</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">41</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">7</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="724">724</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="732">732</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><date type="published" when="2014-07"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract style="main" xml:id="jcpe12257-abs-0001"><head>Abstract</head>
Aim
<p>To assess in a randomized study the patient‐centred outcome of two guided surgery systems (mucosa or bone supported) compared to conventional implant placement, in fully edentulous patients.</p>
Material and Methods
<p>Fifty‐nine patients (72 jaws) with edentulous maxillas and/ or mandibles, were consecutively recruited and randomly assigned to one of the treatment groups. Outcome measures were the Dutch version of the McGill Pain Questionnaire (<hi rend="fc">MPQ</hi>‐<hi rend="fc">DLV</hi>), the Health‐related quality of life instrument (<hi rend="fc">HRQOL</hi>), visual analogue scales (<hi rend="fc">VAS</hi>), the duration of the procedure, and the analgesic doses taken each day.</p>
Results
<p>Three hundred and fourteen implants were placed successfully. No statistical differences could be shown between treatment groups on pain response (<hi rend="fc">MPQ</hi>‐<hi rend="fc">DLV</hi>), treatment perception (<hi rend="fc">VAS</hi>) or number or kind of pain killers. For the <hi rend="fc">HRQOLI</hi>‐instrument, a significant difference was found between the Materialise Mucosa and Materialise Bone group at day 1 (<hi rend="italic">p </hi>=<hi rend="italic"> </hi>0.02) and day 2 (<hi rend="italic">p </hi>=<hi rend="italic"> </hi>0.01). For the duration of the surgery, a statistical difference (<hi rend="italic">p </hi>=<hi rend="italic"> </hi>0.005) was found between the Materialise mucosa and the Mental group, in favour of the first.</p>
Conclusion
<p>In this study little difference could be found in the patient outcome variables of the different treatment groups. However there was a tendency for patients treated with conventional flapped implant placement to experience the pain for a longer period of time.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords><term xml:id="jcpe12257-kwd-0001">flapless surgery</term><term xml:id="jcpe12257-kwd-0002">guided surgery</term><term xml:id="jcpe12257-kwd-0003">patient outcome</term><term xml:id="jcpe12257-kwd-0004">quality of life</term></keywords><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>Original Article</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Implant Therapy</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component type="serialArticle" version="2.0" xml:id="jcpe12257" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</doi><issn type="print">0303-6979</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-051X</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JCPE"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title sort="JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY" type="main">Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><title type="short">J Clin Periodontol</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="70"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/jcpe.2014.41.issue-7</doi><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering number="41" type="journalVolume">41</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">7</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2014-07">July 2014</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" position="110" status="forIssue" type="article"><doi>10.1111/jcpe.12257</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JCPE12257"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count number="9" type="pageTotal"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Original Article</title><title type="tocHeading1">Implant Therapy</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</copyright><eventGroup><event date="2014-04-01" type="manuscriptAccepted"></event><event agent="SPS" date="2014-04-11" type="xmlCreated"></event><event type="publishedOnlineAccepted" date="2014-04-08"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2014-05-27"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2014-06-12"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2014-05-27"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.6.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-10-08"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">724</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">732</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><lineatedText><line>Address:</line><line><i>Marjolein Vercruyssen</i></line><line>KULeuven</line><line><i>School of dentistry, oral pathology and maxillofacial surgery</i></line><line><i>Department of periodontology</i></line><line><i>Kapucijnenvoer 33</i></line><line><i>3000 Leuven</i></line><line><i>Belgium</i></line><line>E‐mail: <email>marjolein.vercruyssen@uzleuven.be</email></line></lineatedText></correspondenceTo><selfCitationGroup><citation type="self" xml:id="jcpe12257-cit-1001"><author><familyName>Vercruyssen</familyName> <givenNames>M</givenNames></author>, <author><familyName>De Laat</familyName> <givenNames>A</givenNames></author>, <author><familyName>Coucke</familyName> <givenNames>W</givenNames></author>, <author><familyName>Quirynen</familyName> <givenNames>M</givenNames></author>. <articleTitle>An RCT comparing patient‐centred outcome variables of guided surgery (bone or mucosa supported) with conventional implant placement</articleTitle>. <journalTitle>J Clin Periodontol</journalTitle> <pubYear year="2014">2014</pubYear>; <vol>41</vol>: <pageFirst>724</pageFirst>–<pageLast>732</pageLast>. doi: <accessionId ref="info:doi/10.1111/jcpe.12257">10.1111/jcpe.12257</accessionId>.</citation></selfCitationGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JCPE.JCPE12257.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><titleGroup><title type="main">An <fc>RCT</fc> comparing patient‐centred outcome variables of guided surgery (bone or mucosa supported) with conventional implant placement</title><title type="shortAuthors">Vercruyssen et al.</title></titleGroup><creators><creator affiliationRef="#jcpe12257-aff-0001" corresponding="yes" creatorRole="author" xml:id="jcpe12257-cr-0001"><personName><givenNames>Marjolein</givenNames> <familyName>Vercruyssen</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#jcpe12257-aff-0002" creatorRole="author" xml:id="jcpe12257-cr-0002"><personName><givenNames>Antoon</givenNames> <familyName>De Laat</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#jcpe12257-aff-0003" creatorRole="author" xml:id="jcpe12257-cr-0003"><personName><givenNames>Wim</givenNames> <familyName>Coucke</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#jcpe12257-aff-0001" creatorRole="author" xml:id="jcpe12257-cr-0004"><personName><givenNames>Marc</givenNames> <familyName>Quirynen</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation countryCode="BE" type="organization" xml:id="jcpe12257-aff-0001"><orgDiv>Department of Periodontology</orgDiv> <orgDiv>Faculty of Medicine</orgDiv> <orgName>Catholic University Leuven</orgName> <address><city>Leuven</city> <country>Belgium</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="BE" type="organization" xml:id="jcpe12257-aff-0002"><orgDiv>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</orgDiv> <orgDiv>Faculty of Medicine</orgDiv> <orgName>Catholic University Leuven</orgName> <address><city>Leuven</city> <country>Belgium</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="BE" type="organization" xml:id="jcpe12257-aff-0003"><orgDiv>Clinical Biology</orgDiv> <orgName>Scientific Institute of Public Health</orgName> <address><city>Brussels</city> <country>Belgium</country></address></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup type="author"><keyword xml:id="jcpe12257-kwd-0001">flapless surgery</keyword><keyword xml:id="jcpe12257-kwd-0002">guided surgery</keyword><keyword xml:id="jcpe12257-kwd-0003">patient outcome</keyword><keyword xml:id="jcpe12257-kwd-0004">quality of life</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:id="jcpe12257-abs-0001"><title type="main">Abstract</title><section xml:id="jcpe12257-sec-0001"><title type="main">Aim</title><p>To assess in a randomized study the patient‐centred outcome of two guided surgery systems (mucosa or bone supported) compared to conventional implant placement, in fully edentulous patients.</p></section><section xml:id="jcpe12257-sec-0002"><title type="main">Material and Methods</title><p>Fifty‐nine patients (72 jaws) with edentulous maxillas and/ or mandibles, were consecutively recruited and randomly assigned to one of the treatment groups. Outcome measures were the Dutch version of the McGill Pain Questionnaire (<fc>MPQ</fc>‐<fc>DLV</fc>), the Health‐related quality of life instrument (<fc>HRQOL</fc>), visual analogue scales (<fc>VAS</fc>), the duration of the procedure, and the analgesic doses taken each day.</p></section><section xml:id="jcpe12257-sec-0003"><title type="main">Results</title><p>Three hundred and fourteen implants were placed successfully. No statistical differences could be shown between treatment groups on pain response (<fc>MPQ</fc>‐<fc>DLV</fc>), treatment perception (<fc>VAS</fc>) or number or kind of pain killers. For the <fc>HRQOLI</fc>‐instrument, a significant difference was found between the Materialise Mucosa and Materialise Bone group at day 1 (<i>p </i>=<i> </i>0.02) and day 2 (<i>p </i>=<i> </i>0.01). For the duration of the surgery, a statistical difference (<i>p </i>=<i> </i>0.005) was found between the Materialise mucosa and the Mental group, in favour of the first.</p></section><section xml:id="jcpe12257-sec-0004"><title type="main">Conclusion</title><p>In this study little difference could be found in the patient outcome variables of the different treatment groups. However there was a tendency for patients treated with conventional flapped implant placement to experience the pain for a longer period of time.</p></section></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta><noteGroup xml:id="jcpe12257-ntgp-0001"><note numbered="no" xml:id="jcpe12257-note-0001"><p><b>Conflict of interest and source of funding statement</b></p><p>There are no conflicts of interests.</p><p>Oral implants were delivered free of charge by DENTSPLY Implants (Mölndal, Sweden), stereolithographic guides were delivered free of charge by the Materialise Dental Company (Leuven, Belgium).</p></note></noteGroup></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>An RCT comparing patient‐centred outcome variables of guided surgery (bone or mucosa supported) with conventional implant placement</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>An RCT comparing patient‐centred outcome variables of guided surgery (bone or mucosa supported) with conventional implant placement</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Marjolein</namePart><namePart type="family">Vercruyssen</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><affiliation>Address:KULeuvenE‐mail:</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: marjolein.vercruyssen@uzleuven.be</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Antoon</namePart><namePart type="family">De Laat</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Wim</namePart><namePart type="family">Coucke</namePart><affiliation>Clinical Biology, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Marc</namePart><namePart type="family">Quirynen</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2014-07</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2014-04-11</dateCreated><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2014-04-01</dateValid><edition>Vercruyssen M, De Laat A, Coucke W, Quirynen M. An RCT comparing patient‐centred outcome variables of guided surgery (bone or mucosa supported) with conventional implant placement. J Clin Periodontol 2014; 41: 724–732. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12257.</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2014</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><abstract>To assess in a randomized study the patient‐centred outcome of two guided surgery systems (mucosa or bone supported) compared to conventional implant placement, in fully edentulous patients.</abstract><abstract>Fifty‐nine patients (72 jaws) with edentulous maxillas and/ or mandibles, were consecutively recruited and randomly assigned to one of the treatment groups. Outcome measures were the Dutch version of the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ‐DLV), the Health‐related quality of life instrument (HRQOL), visual analogue scales (VAS), the duration of the procedure, and the analgesic doses taken each day.</abstract><abstract>Three hundred and fourteen implants were placed successfully. No statistical differences could be shown between treatment groups on pain response (MPQ‐DLV), treatment perception (VAS) or number or kind of pain killers. For the HRQOLI‐instrument, a significant difference was found between the Materialise Mucosa and Materialise Bone group at day 1 (p = 0.02) and day 2 (p = 0.01). For the duration of the surgery, a statistical difference (p = 0.005) was found between the Materialise mucosa and the Mental group, in favour of the first.</abstract><abstract>In this study little difference could be found in the patient outcome variables of the different treatment groups. However there was a tendency for patients treated with conventional flapped implant placement to experience the pain for a longer period of time.</abstract><subject><genre>keywords</genre><topic>flapless surgery</topic><topic>guided surgery</topic><topic>patient outcome</topic><topic>quality of life</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>J Clin Periodontol</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Original Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0303-6979</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-051X</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JCPE</identifier><part><date>2014</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>41</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>7</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>724</start><end>732</end><total>9</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">5826FE6F4D35BA5AD1429A8F803B12A3518AF1E1</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-STBK6BLR-2</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/jcpe.12257</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JCPE12257</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5826FE6F4D35BA5AD1429A8F803B12A3518AF1E1/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002B39 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002B39 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:5826FE6F4D35BA5AD1429A8F803B12A3518AF1E1
|texte= An RCT comparing patient‐centred outcome variables of guided surgery (bone or mucosa supported) with conventional implant placement
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |