Is osseointegration a requirement for success in implant dentistry?
Identifieur interne : 002818 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 002817; suivant : 002819Is osseointegration a requirement for success in implant dentistry?
Auteurs : S. Szmukler-Moncler ; J. H. DubruilleSource :
- Clinical Materials [ 0267-6605 ] ; 1990.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Alumina, Bioactive, Bioactive biomaterials, Bioactive material, Bioactive materials, Biomaterial, Biomaterials, Branemark, Clinical dentistry, Connective tissue, Connective tissue interposition, Definition problem, Dentistry, Diffuse interface, Dubruille, Elemental analysis, Full chemical, Implant, Implant dentistry, Implant surface, Implantology, Inert material, Inert materials, Interface, Light microscopy, Material interface, Osseointegrated implants, Osseointegration, Osteal, Osteal integration, Other hand, Physical basis, Sharp interface, Strong need, Term osseointegration, Term osteal integration, Titanium, Vivo behavior.
- Teeft :
- Alumina, Bioactive, Bioactive biomaterials, Bioactive material, Bioactive materials, Biomaterial, Biomaterials, Branemark, Clinical dentistry, Connective tissue, Connective tissue interposition, Definition problem, Dentistry, Diffuse interface, Dubruille, Elemental analysis, Full chemical, Implant, Implant dentistry, Implant surface, Implantology, Inert material, Inert materials, Interface, Light microscopy, Material interface, Osseointegrated implants, Osseointegration, Osteal, Osteal integration, Other hand, Physical basis, Sharp interface, Strong need, Term osseointegration, Term osteal integration, Titanium, Vivo behavior.
Abstract
Abstract: The term ‘osseointegration’ was coined in 1977. This term gained popularity and has been extensively used, but with various and diverging meanings; therefore, there is a strong need to redefine it. We propose a definition of the concept of osseointegration grounded on a physical basis. Since bioactive biomaterials are more strongly integrated than inert ones (e.g. titanium or alumina), and since osseointegration is a word implying strong bonding, we propose to devote, the use of the concept of osseointegration for materials which are most successfully integrated into bone, i.e. when the bone/implant interface is a diffuse interface with full chemical bonding, such as for bioactive biomaterials. If the bonelimplant interface is a sharp one, the concept of osseointegration is no longer relevant and we propose use of the term ‘osteal integration’, i. e. for inert biomaterials, such as titanium and alumina. Based on this proposition, we assert that osseointegration is not a requirement for success in implant dentistry.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/0267-6605(90)90019-R
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:519FE419477CEE3A8FF1F1D6124B3366B6D58AD2Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>Is osseointegration a requirement for success in implant dentistry?</title><author><name sortKey="Szmukler Moncler, S" sort="Szmukler Moncler, S" uniqKey="Szmukler Moncler S" first="S." last="Szmukler-Moncler">S. Szmukler-Moncler</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institut de Physique et de Chimie des Matériaux de Strasbourg, Groupe Surfaces-Interfaces (IPCMS-GSI), Unité Mixte ULP-CNRS-EHIC, 4 rue B. Pascal, 67000 Strasbourg, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Dubruille, J H" sort="Dubruille, J H" uniqKey="Dubruille J" first="J. H." last="Dubruille">J. H. Dubruille</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institut de Stomatologie et de Chirurgie Maxillo-faciale, Hopital Pitíe-Salpétrière, 47 Bld de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:519FE419477CEE3A8FF1F1D6124B3366B6D58AD2</idno><date when="1990" year="1990">1990</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/0267-6605(90)90019-R</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/519FE419477CEE3A8FF1F1D6124B3366B6D58AD2/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002818</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002818</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">Is osseointegration a requirement for success in implant dentistry?</title><author><name sortKey="Szmukler Moncler, S" sort="Szmukler Moncler, S" uniqKey="Szmukler Moncler S" first="S." last="Szmukler-Moncler">S. Szmukler-Moncler</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institut de Physique et de Chimie des Matériaux de Strasbourg, Groupe Surfaces-Interfaces (IPCMS-GSI), Unité Mixte ULP-CNRS-EHIC, 4 rue B. Pascal, 67000 Strasbourg, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Dubruille, J H" sort="Dubruille, J H" uniqKey="Dubruille J" first="J. H." last="Dubruille">J. H. Dubruille</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institut de Stomatologie et de Chirurgie Maxillo-faciale, Hopital Pitíe-Salpétrière, 47 Bld de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Clinical Materials</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">CLMA</title><idno type="ISSN">0267-6605</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1990">1990</date><biblScope unit="volume">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2–4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="201">201</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="208">208</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0267-6605</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0267-6605</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Alumina</term><term>Bioactive</term><term>Bioactive biomaterials</term><term>Bioactive material</term><term>Bioactive materials</term><term>Biomaterial</term><term>Biomaterials</term><term>Branemark</term><term>Clinical dentistry</term><term>Connective tissue</term><term>Connective tissue interposition</term><term>Definition problem</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Diffuse interface</term><term>Dubruille</term><term>Elemental analysis</term><term>Full chemical</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant dentistry</term><term>Implant surface</term><term>Implantology</term><term>Inert material</term><term>Inert materials</term><term>Interface</term><term>Light microscopy</term><term>Material interface</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Osteal</term><term>Osteal integration</term><term>Other hand</term><term>Physical basis</term><term>Sharp interface</term><term>Strong need</term><term>Term osseointegration</term><term>Term osteal integration</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Vivo behavior</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Alumina</term><term>Bioactive</term><term>Bioactive biomaterials</term><term>Bioactive material</term><term>Bioactive materials</term><term>Biomaterial</term><term>Biomaterials</term><term>Branemark</term><term>Clinical dentistry</term><term>Connective tissue</term><term>Connective tissue interposition</term><term>Definition problem</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Diffuse interface</term><term>Dubruille</term><term>Elemental analysis</term><term>Full chemical</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant dentistry</term><term>Implant surface</term><term>Implantology</term><term>Inert material</term><term>Inert materials</term><term>Interface</term><term>Light microscopy</term><term>Material interface</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Osteal</term><term>Osteal integration</term><term>Other hand</term><term>Physical basis</term><term>Sharp interface</term><term>Strong need</term><term>Term osseointegration</term><term>Term osteal integration</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Vivo behavior</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: The term ‘osseointegration’ was coined in 1977. This term gained popularity and has been extensively used, but with various and diverging meanings; therefore, there is a strong need to redefine it. We propose a definition of the concept of osseointegration grounded on a physical basis. Since bioactive biomaterials are more strongly integrated than inert ones (e.g. titanium or alumina), and since osseointegration is a word implying strong bonding, we propose to devote, the use of the concept of osseointegration for materials which are most successfully integrated into bone, i.e. when the bone/implant interface is a diffuse interface with full chemical bonding, such as for bioactive biomaterials. If the bonelimplant interface is a sharp one, the concept of osseointegration is no longer relevant and we propose use of the term ‘osteal integration’, i. e. for inert biomaterials, such as titanium and alumina. Based on this proposition, we assert that osseointegration is not a requirement for success in implant dentistry.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>elsevier</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>osseointegration</json:string><json:string>bioactive</json:string><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>biomaterials</json:string><json:string>osteal</json:string><json:string>biomaterial</json:string><json:string>term osseointegration</json:string><json:string>interface</json:string><json:string>branemark</json:string><json:string>bioactive material</json:string><json:string>alumina</json:string><json:string>diffuse interface</json:string><json:string>dubruille</json:string><json:string>osteal integration</json:string><json:string>implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>implantology</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>connective tissue interposition</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>inert materials</json:string><json:string>physical basis</json:string><json:string>bioactive materials</json:string><json:string>material interface</json:string><json:string>term osteal integration</json:string><json:string>titanium</json:string><json:string>vivo behavior</json:string><json:string>strong need</json:string><json:string>inert material</json:string><json:string>full chemical</json:string><json:string>elemental analysis</json:string><json:string>connective tissue</json:string><json:string>light microscopy</json:string><json:string>other hand</json:string><json:string>sharp interface</json:string><json:string>definition problem</json:string><json:string>bioactive biomaterials</json:string><json:string>clinical dentistry</json:string><json:string>implant surface</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>S. Szmukler-Moncler</name><affiliations><json:string>Institut de Physique et de Chimie des Matériaux de Strasbourg, Groupe Surfaces-Interfaces (IPCMS-GSI), Unité Mixte ULP-CNRS-EHIC, 4 rue B. Pascal, 67000 Strasbourg, France</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>J.H. Dubruille</name><affiliations><json:string>Institut de Stomatologie et de Chirurgie Maxillo-faciale, Hopital Pitíe-Salpétrière, 47 Bld de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><arkIstex>ark:/67375/6H6-WZTJ6XJN-P</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>Full-length article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Abstract: The term ‘osseointegration’ was coined in 1977. This term gained popularity and has been extensively used, but with various and diverging meanings; therefore, there is a strong need to redefine it. We propose a definition of the concept of osseointegration grounded on a physical basis. Since bioactive biomaterials are more strongly integrated than inert ones (e.g. titanium or alumina), and since osseointegration is a word implying strong bonding, we propose to devote, the use of the concept of osseointegration for materials which are most successfully integrated into bone, i.e. when the bone/implant interface is a diffuse interface with full chemical bonding, such as for bioactive biomaterials. If the bonelimplant interface is a sharp one, the concept of osseointegration is no longer relevant and we propose use of the term ‘osteal integration’, i. e. for inert biomaterials, such as titanium and alumina. Based on this proposition, we assert that osseointegration is not a requirement for success in implant dentistry.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>5.862</score><pdfWordCount>1954</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>12757</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>8</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>468 x 684 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>159</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1040</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>0</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Is osseointegration a requirement for success in implant dentistry?</title><pmid><json:string>10183937</json:string></pmid><pii><json:string>0267-6605(90)90019-R</json:string></pii><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Materials</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><publicationDate>1990</publicationDate><issn><json:string>0267-6605</json:string></issn><pii><json:string>S0267-6605(00)X0006-6</json:string></pii><volume>5</volume><issue>2–4</issue><pages><first>201</first><last>208</last></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1986</json:string><json:string>1982</json:string><json:string>1990</json:string><json:string>1977</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd</json:string><json:string>France ABSTRACT The</json:string><json:string>Mosby Co.</json:string><json:string>World Congress</json:string><json:string>Academy of Osseointegration</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Branemark</json:string><json:string>D. F. Williams</json:string><json:string>Dr Y. Reingewirtz</json:string><json:string>J. Oral</json:string><json:string>J. De</json:string><json:string>J. Period</json:string><json:string>J. Plast</json:string><json:string>S. Lecointe</json:string><json:string>S. Szmukler-Moncler</json:string><json:string>Vivo Behavior</json:string><json:string>J. Dent</json:string><json:string>J. H. Dubruille</json:string><json:string>J. Biomed</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>MO</json:string><json:string>Toronto</json:string><json:string>Strasbourg</json:string><json:string>Porto</json:string><json:string>Amsterdam</json:string><json:string>York</json:string><json:string>Ireland</json:string><json:string>St Louis</json:string><json:string>Chester</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Branemark et al.</json:string><json:string>Quintessence Co, Chicago, 1985</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/6H6-WZTJ6XJN-P</json:string></ark><categories><wos></wos><scienceMetrix></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Life Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology</json:string><json:string>3 - Biophysics</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string><json:string>4 - chirurgie (generalites). transplantations, greffes d'organes et de tissus. pathologie des greffons</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>1990</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1990</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1016/0267-6605(90)90019-R</json:string></doi><id>519FE419477CEE3A8FF1F1D6124B3366B6D58AD2</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/519FE419477CEE3A8FF1F1D6124B3366B6D58AD2/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/519FE419477CEE3A8FF1F1D6124B3366B6D58AD2/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/519FE419477CEE3A8FF1F1D6124B3366B6D58AD2/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a">Is osseointegration a requirement for success in implant dentistry?</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><availability><p>ELSEVIER</p></availability><date>1990</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a">Is osseointegration a requirement for success in implant dentistry?</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">S.</forename><surname>Szmukler-Moncler</surname></persName><affiliation>Institut de Physique et de Chimie des Matériaux de Strasbourg, Groupe Surfaces-Interfaces (IPCMS-GSI), Unité Mixte ULP-CNRS-EHIC, 4 rue B. Pascal, 67000 Strasbourg, France</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">J.H.</forename><surname>Dubruille</surname></persName><affiliation>To whom correspondence should be addressed.</affiliation><affiliation>Institut de Stomatologie et de Chirurgie Maxillo-faciale, Hopital Pitíe-Salpétrière, 47 Bld de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">519FE419477CEE3A8FF1F1D6124B3366B6D58AD2</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/0267-6605(90)90019-R</idno><idno type="PII">0267-6605(90)90019-R</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Clinical Materials</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">CLMA</title><idno type="pISSN">0267-6605</idno><idno type="PII">S0267-6605(00)X0006-6</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1990"></date><biblScope unit="volume">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2–4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="201">201</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="208">208</biblScope></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1990</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The term ‘osseointegration’ was coined in 1977. This term gained popularity and has been extensively used, but with various and diverging meanings; therefore, there is a strong need to redefine it. We propose a definition of the concept of osseointegration grounded on a physical basis. Since bioactive biomaterials are more strongly integrated than inert ones (e.g. titanium or alumina), and since osseointegration is a word implying strong bonding, we propose to devote, the use of the concept of osseointegration for materials which are most successfully integrated into bone, i.e. when the bone/implant interface is a diffuse interface with full chemical bonding, such as for bioactive biomaterials. If the bonelimplant interface is a sharp one, the concept of osseointegration is no longer relevant and we propose use of the term ‘osteal integration’, i. e. for inert biomaterials, such as titanium and alumina. Based on this proposition, we assert that osseointegration is not a requirement for success in implant dentistry.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1990">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/519FE419477CEE3A8FF1F1D6124B3366B6D58AD2/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Elsevier, elements deleted: tail"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//ES//DTD journal article DTD version 4.5.2//EN//XML" URI="art452.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><converted-article version="4.5.2" docsubtype="fla"><item-info><jid>CLMA</jid><aid>9090019R</aid><ce:pii>0267-6605(90)90019-R</ce:pii><ce:doi>10.1016/0267-6605(90)90019-R</ce:doi><ce:copyright type="unknown" year="1990"></ce:copyright></item-info><head><ce:title>Is osseointegration a requirement for success in implant dentistry?</ce:title><ce:author-group><ce:author><ce:given-name>S.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Szmukler-Moncler</ce:surname></ce:author><ce:affiliation><ce:textfn>Institut de Physique et de Chimie des Matériaux de Strasbourg, Groupe Surfaces-Interfaces (IPCMS-GSI), Unité Mixte ULP-CNRS-EHIC, 4 rue B. Pascal, 67000 Strasbourg, France</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation></ce:author-group><ce:author-group><ce:author><ce:given-name>J.H.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Dubruille</ce:surname><ce:cross-ref refid="COR1"><ce:sup>∗</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:affiliation><ce:textfn>Institut de Stomatologie et de Chirurgie Maxillo-faciale, Hopital Pitíe-Salpétrière, 47 Bld de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation><ce:correspondence id="COR1"><ce:label>∗</ce:label><ce:text>To whom correspondence should be addressed.</ce:text></ce:correspondence></ce:author-group><ce:abstract><ce:section-title>Abstract</ce:section-title><ce:abstract-sec><ce:simple-para>The term ‘osseointegration’ was coined in <ce:italic>1977</ce:italic>. This term gained popularity and has been extensively used, but with various and diverging meanings; therefore, there is a strong need to redefine it. We propose a definition of the concept of osseointegration grounded on a physical basis. Since bioactive biomaterials are more strongly integrated than inert ones (e.g. titanium or alumina), and since osseointegration is a word implying strong bonding, we propose to devote, the use of the concept of osseointegration for materials which are most successfully integrated into bone, i.e. when the bone/implant interface is a diffuse interface with full chemical bonding, such as for bioactive biomaterials. If the bonelimplant interface is a sharp one, the concept of osseointegration is no longer relevant and we propose use of the term ‘osteal integration’, i. e. for inert biomaterials, such as titanium and alumina. Based on this proposition, we assert that osseointegration is not a requirement for success in implant dentistry.</ce:simple-para></ce:abstract-sec></ce:abstract></head></converted-article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo><title>Is osseointegration a requirement for success in implant dentistry?</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA"><title>Is osseointegration a requirement for success in implant dentistry?</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">S.</namePart><namePart type="family">Szmukler-Moncler</namePart><affiliation>Institut de Physique et de Chimie des Matériaux de Strasbourg, Groupe Surfaces-Interfaces (IPCMS-GSI), Unité Mixte ULP-CNRS-EHIC, 4 rue B. Pascal, 67000 Strasbourg, France</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">J.H.</namePart><namePart type="family">Dubruille</namePart><affiliation>Institut de Stomatologie et de Chirurgie Maxillo-faciale, Hopital Pitíe-Salpétrière, 47 Bld de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France</affiliation><description>To whom correspondence should be addressed.</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="Full-length article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1990</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1990</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><abstract lang="en">Abstract: The term ‘osseointegration’ was coined in 1977. This term gained popularity and has been extensively used, but with various and diverging meanings; therefore, there is a strong need to redefine it. We propose a definition of the concept of osseointegration grounded on a physical basis. Since bioactive biomaterials are more strongly integrated than inert ones (e.g. titanium or alumina), and since osseointegration is a word implying strong bonding, we propose to devote, the use of the concept of osseointegration for materials which are most successfully integrated into bone, i.e. when the bone/implant interface is a diffuse interface with full chemical bonding, such as for bioactive biomaterials. If the bonelimplant interface is a sharp one, the concept of osseointegration is no longer relevant and we propose use of the term ‘osteal integration’, i. e. for inert biomaterials, such as titanium and alumina. Based on this proposition, we assert that osseointegration is not a requirement for success in implant dentistry.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Materials</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>CLMA</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1990</dateIssued></originInfo><identifier type="ISSN">0267-6605</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0267-6605(00)X0006-6</identifier><part><date>1990</date><detail type="issue"><title>EMRS interfaces in biomaterials sciences</title></detail><detail type="volume"><number>5</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="issue"><number>2–4</number><caption>no.</caption></detail><extent unit="issue-pages"><start>95</start><end>341</end></extent><extent unit="pages"><start>201</start><end>208</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">519FE419477CEE3A8FF1F1D6124B3366B6D58AD2</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/6H6-WZTJ6XJN-P</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1016/0267-6605(90)90019-R</identifier><identifier type="PII">0267-6605(90)90019-R</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-HKKZVM7B-M">elsevier</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/519FE419477CEE3A8FF1F1D6124B3366B6D58AD2/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002818 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002818 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:519FE419477CEE3A8FF1F1D6124B3366B6D58AD2
|texte= Is osseointegration a requirement for success in implant dentistry?
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |