The clinical success and periodontal evaluation of patients rehabilitated with light‐cured obturators
Identifieur interne : 002663 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 002662; suivant : 002664The clinical success and periodontal evaluation of patients rehabilitated with light‐cured obturators
Auteurs : I. C. Benington ; C. Lappin ; G. J. Linden ; R. ThompsonSource :
- Journal of Oral Rehabilitation [ 0305-182X ] ; 1996-02.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Ablative surgery, Abutment, Abutment teeth, Acta, Acta odontologica scandinavica, Attachment level, Blackwell science, Bulb acrylic obturators, Clinical performance, Control teeth, Control teeth abutment, Dentistry, Frequency distribution, Gingival, Gingival index, Gingival recession, Hollow bulb, Mandible, Maxilla, Median, Median value, Obturator, Odontologica, Oral hygiene, Oral rehabilitation, Patient perception, Periodontal, Periodontal disease, Periodontal evaluation, Periodontal examination, Periodontal health, Periodontal status, Plaque, Plaque accumulations, Plaque index, Pocket depth, Postal appointments, Prosthesis, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Silness, Tooth surfaces.
- Teeft :
- Ablative surgery, Abutment, Abutment teeth, Acta, Acta odontologica scandinavica, Attachment level, Blackwell science, Bulb acrylic obturators, Clinical performance, Control teeth, Control teeth abutment, Dentistry, Frequency distribution, Gingival, Gingival index, Gingival recession, Hollow bulb, Mandible, Maxilla, Median, Median value, Obturator, Odontologica, Oral hygiene, Oral rehabilitation, Patient perception, Periodontal, Periodontal disease, Periodontal evaluation, Periodontal examination, Periodontal health, Periodontal status, Plaque, Plaque accumulations, Plaque index, Pocket depth, Postal appointments, Prosthesis, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Silness, Tooth surfaces.
Abstract
summary The clinical performance of a visible light‐cured (VLC) resin for obturators was evaluated in 10 patients. All patients had undergone ablative surgery of the maxilla, previously worn conventional heat‐cured hollow bulb acrylic obturators and were currently rehabilitated with VLC obturators. The obturators were assessed on their performance for each of the following: weight, retention, speech, eating and comfort. An evaluation of the periodontal status of those who retained teeth in the maxilla was also performed. It is concluded that patients found VLC obturators to have a more acceptable clinical performance than conventional acrylic obturators due primarily to a reduction in appliance weight.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1996.tb01222.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:4E4A7D89A6769B5B6169708CF812E06F008A3086Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The clinical success and periodontal evaluation of patients rehabilitated with light‐cured obturators</title><author><name sortKey="Benington, I C" sort="Benington, I C" uniqKey="Benington I" first="I. C." last="Benington">I. C. Benington</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Clinical Dentistry, Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence address: Professor I.C. Benington, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Royal Group of Hospitals Trust, Grosvenor Road, Belfast BT12 6BP, Northern Ireland.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lappin, C" sort="Lappin, C" uniqKey="Lappin C" first="C." last="Lappin">C. Lappin</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Clinical Dentistry, Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Linden, G J" sort="Linden, G J" uniqKey="Linden G" first="G. J." last="Linden">G. J. Linden</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Clinical Dentistry, Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Thompson, R" sort="Thompson, R" uniqKey="Thompson R" first="R." last="Thompson">R. Thompson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Clinical Dentistry, Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:4E4A7D89A6769B5B6169708CF812E06F008A3086</idno><date when="1996" year="1996">1996</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2842.1996.tb01222.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/4E4A7D89A6769B5B6169708CF812E06F008A3086/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002663</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002663</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The clinical success and periodontal evaluation of patients rehabilitated with light‐cured obturators</title><author><name sortKey="Benington, I C" sort="Benington, I C" uniqKey="Benington I" first="I. C." last="Benington">I. C. Benington</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Clinical Dentistry, Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence address: Professor I.C. Benington, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Royal Group of Hospitals Trust, Grosvenor Road, Belfast BT12 6BP, Northern Ireland.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lappin, C" sort="Lappin, C" uniqKey="Lappin C" first="C." last="Lappin">C. Lappin</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Clinical Dentistry, Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Linden, G J" sort="Linden, G J" uniqKey="Linden G" first="G. J." last="Linden">G. J. Linden</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Clinical Dentistry, Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Thompson, R" sort="Thompson, R" uniqKey="Thompson R" first="R." last="Thompson">R. Thompson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Clinical Dentistry, Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">23</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="135">135</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="138">138</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">4</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1996-02">1996-02</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Ablative surgery</term><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment teeth</term><term>Acta</term><term>Acta odontologica scandinavica</term><term>Attachment level</term><term>Blackwell science</term><term>Bulb acrylic obturators</term><term>Clinical performance</term><term>Control teeth</term><term>Control teeth abutment</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Frequency distribution</term><term>Gingival</term><term>Gingival index</term><term>Gingival recession</term><term>Hollow bulb</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Median</term><term>Median value</term><term>Obturator</term><term>Odontologica</term><term>Oral hygiene</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Patient perception</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontal disease</term><term>Periodontal evaluation</term><term>Periodontal examination</term><term>Periodontal health</term><term>Periodontal status</term><term>Plaque</term><term>Plaque accumulations</term><term>Plaque index</term><term>Pocket depth</term><term>Postal appointments</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Silness</term><term>Tooth surfaces</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Ablative surgery</term><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment teeth</term><term>Acta</term><term>Acta odontologica scandinavica</term><term>Attachment level</term><term>Blackwell science</term><term>Bulb acrylic obturators</term><term>Clinical performance</term><term>Control teeth</term><term>Control teeth abutment</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Frequency distribution</term><term>Gingival</term><term>Gingival index</term><term>Gingival recession</term><term>Hollow bulb</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Median</term><term>Median value</term><term>Obturator</term><term>Odontologica</term><term>Oral hygiene</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Patient perception</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontal disease</term><term>Periodontal evaluation</term><term>Periodontal examination</term><term>Periodontal health</term><term>Periodontal status</term><term>Plaque</term><term>Plaque accumulations</term><term>Plaque index</term><term>Pocket depth</term><term>Postal appointments</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Silness</term><term>Tooth surfaces</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">summary The clinical performance of a visible light‐cured (VLC) resin for obturators was evaluated in 10 patients. All patients had undergone ablative surgery of the maxilla, previously worn conventional heat‐cured hollow bulb acrylic obturators and were currently rehabilitated with VLC obturators. The obturators were assessed on their performance for each of the following: weight, retention, speech, eating and comfort. An evaluation of the periodontal status of those who retained teeth in the maxilla was also performed. It is concluded that patients found VLC obturators to have a more acceptable clinical performance than conventional acrylic obturators due primarily to a reduction in appliance weight.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>obturator</json:string><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>periodontal</json:string><json:string>maxilla</json:string><json:string>abutment teeth</json:string><json:string>control teeth</json:string><json:string>prosthetic</json:string><json:string>gingival</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>tooth surfaces</json:string><json:string>attachment level</json:string><json:string>odontologica</json:string><json:string>oral rehabilitation</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>median value</json:string><json:string>acta</json:string><json:string>silness</json:string><json:string>frequency distribution</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>patient perception</json:string><json:string>clinical performance</json:string><json:string>hollow bulb</json:string><json:string>blackwell science</json:string><json:string>plaque index</json:string><json:string>acta odontologica scandinavica</json:string><json:string>median</json:string><json:string>plaque</json:string><json:string>plaque accumulations</json:string><json:string>pocket depth</json:string><json:string>gingival index</json:string><json:string>periodontal examination</json:string><json:string>postal appointments</json:string><json:string>periodontal health</json:string><json:string>gingival recession</json:string><json:string>oral hygiene</json:string><json:string>control teeth abutment</json:string><json:string>periodontal status</json:string><json:string>prosthetic dentistry</json:string><json:string>bulb acrylic obturators</json:string><json:string>ablative surgery</json:string><json:string>periodontal evaluation</json:string><json:string>periodontal disease</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>I. C. Benington</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Clinical Dentistry, Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland</json:string><json:string>Correspondence address: Professor I.C. Benington, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Royal Group of Hospitals Trust, Grosvenor Road, Belfast BT12 6BP, Northern Ireland.</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>C. Lappin</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Clinical Dentistry, Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>G. J. Linden</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Clinical Dentistry, Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>R. Thompson</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Clinical Dentistry, Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>JOOR135</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-P981P4TF-K</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>summary The clinical performance of a visible light‐cured (VLC) resin for obturators was evaluated in 10 patients. All patients had undergone ablative surgery of the maxilla, previously worn conventional heat‐cured hollow bulb acrylic obturators and were currently rehabilitated with VLC obturators. The obturators were assessed on their performance for each of the following: weight, retention, speech, eating and comfort. An evaluation of the periodontal status of those who retained teeth in the maxilla was also performed. It is concluded that patients found VLC obturators to have a more acceptable clinical performance than conventional acrylic obturators due primarily to a reduction in appliance weight.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>5.291</score><pdfWordCount>2055</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>13120</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.6</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>5</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>720 x 954 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>103</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>711</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>0</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>The clinical success and periodontal evaluation of patients rehabilitated with light‐cured obturators</title><pmid><json:string>8850065</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0305-182X</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1365-2842</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JOOR</json:string></publisherId><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><pages><first>135</first><last>138</last><total>4</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1996</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Blackwell Science Ltd</json:string><json:string>Trey Dentsply Ltd.</json:string><json:string>Northern Ireland SUMMARY The</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Mrs Sally</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Belfast</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Muhlemann & Son, 1971</json:string><json:string>Loe & Silness, 1963</json:string><json:string>Benington, 1989</json:string><json:string>Silness & Loe, 1964</json:string><json:string>Schwartzman, Caputo & Beumer, 1990</json:string><json:string>Bergman, Hugoson & Olsson, 1971</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-P981P4TF-K</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>1996</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1996</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1365-2842.1996.tb01222.x</json:string></doi><id>4E4A7D89A6769B5B6169708CF812E06F008A3086</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/4E4A7D89A6769B5B6169708CF812E06F008A3086/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/4E4A7D89A6769B5B6169708CF812E06F008A3086/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/4E4A7D89A6769B5B6169708CF812E06F008A3086/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">The clinical success and periodontal evaluation of patients rehabilitated with light‐cured obturators</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1996-02"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The clinical success and periodontal evaluation of patients rehabilitated with light‐cured obturators</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">I. C.</forename><surname>Benington</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Clinical Dentistry, Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland<address><country key="IE"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Professor I.C. Benington, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Royal Group of Hospitals Trust, Grosvenor Road, Belfast BT12 6BP, Northern Ireland.</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">C.</forename><surname>Lappin</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Clinical Dentistry, Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland<address><country key="IE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">G. J.</forename><surname>Linden</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Clinical Dentistry, Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland<address><country key="IE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">R.</forename><surname>Thompson</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Clinical Dentistry, Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland<address><country key="IE"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">4E4A7D89A6769B5B6169708CF812E06F008A3086</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-P981P4TF-K</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2842.1996.tb01222.x</idno><idno type="unit">JOOR135</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JOOR.JOOR135.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title><idno type="pISSN">0305-182X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/jor.1996.23.issue-2</idno><idno type="product">JOOR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">23</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="135">135</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="138">138</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">4</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1996-02"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p><hi rend="bold"><hi rend="smallCaps">summary</hi></hi> The clinical performance of a visible light‐cured (VLC) resin for obturators was evaluated in 10 patients. All patients had undergone ablative surgery of the maxilla, previously worn conventional heat‐cured hollow bulb acrylic obturators and were currently rehabilitated with VLC obturators. The obturators were assessed on their performance for each of the following: weight, retention, speech, eating and comfort. An evaluation of the periodontal status of those who retained teeth in the maxilla was also performed. It is concluded that patients found VLC obturators to have a more acceptable clinical performance than conventional acrylic obturators due primarily to a reduction in appliance weight.</p></abstract><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/4E4A7D89A6769B5B6169708CF812E06F008A3086/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</doi><issn type="print">0305-182X</issn><issn type="electronic">1365-2842</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JOOR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="02002"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/jor.1996.23.issue-2</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="23">23</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="2">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="1996-02">February 1996</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0013500" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1365-2842.1996.tb01222.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JOOR135"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="4"></count></countGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2007-05-29"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2007-05-29"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-03-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-20"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-30"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="135">135</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="138">138</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Professor I.C. Benington, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Royal Group of Hospitals Trust, Grosvenor Road, Belfast BT12 6BP, Northern Ireland.</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JOOR.JOOR135.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="referenceTotal" number="8"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="5"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">The clinical success and periodontal evaluation of patients rehabilitated with light‐cured obturators</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>I. C.</givenNames><familyName>Benington</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>C.</givenNames><familyName>Lappin</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>G. J.</givenNames><familyName>Linden</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>R.</givenNames><familyName>Thompson</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="IE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Clinical Dentistry, Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><b><sc>summary</sc></b> The clinical performance of a visible light‐cured (VLC) resin for obturators was evaluated in 10 patients. All patients had undergone ablative surgery of the maxilla, previously worn conventional heat‐cured hollow bulb acrylic obturators and were currently rehabilitated with VLC obturators. The obturators were assessed on their performance for each of the following: weight, retention, speech, eating and comfort. An evaluation of the periodontal status of those who retained teeth in the maxilla was also performed. It is concluded that patients found VLC obturators to have a more acceptable clinical performance than conventional acrylic obturators due primarily to a reduction in appliance weight.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>The clinical success and periodontal evaluation of patients rehabilitated with light‐cured obturators</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>The clinical success and periodontal evaluation of patients rehabilitated with light‐cured obturators</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">I. C.</namePart><namePart type="family">Benington</namePart><affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Clinical Dentistry, Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland</affiliation><affiliation>Correspondence address: Professor I.C. Benington, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Royal Group of Hospitals Trust, Grosvenor Road, Belfast BT12 6BP, Northern Ireland.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">C.</namePart><namePart type="family">Lappin</namePart><affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Clinical Dentistry, Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">G. J.</namePart><namePart type="family">Linden</namePart><affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Clinical Dentistry, Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">R.</namePart><namePart type="family">Thompson</namePart><affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Clinical Dentistry, Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1996-02</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1996</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="references">8</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">5</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>summary The clinical performance of a visible light‐cured (VLC) resin for obturators was evaluated in 10 patients. All patients had undergone ablative surgery of the maxilla, previously worn conventional heat‐cured hollow bulb acrylic obturators and were currently rehabilitated with VLC obturators. The obturators were assessed on their performance for each of the following: weight, retention, speech, eating and comfort. An evaluation of the periodontal status of those who retained teeth in the maxilla was also performed. It is concluded that patients found VLC obturators to have a more acceptable clinical performance than conventional acrylic obturators due primarily to a reduction in appliance weight.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0305-182X</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1365-2842</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JOOR</identifier><part><date>1996</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>23</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>135</start><end>138</end><total>4</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">4E4A7D89A6769B5B6169708CF812E06F008A3086</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-P981P4TF-K</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2842.1996.tb01222.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JOOR135</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/4E4A7D89A6769B5B6169708CF812E06F008A3086/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002663 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002663 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:4E4A7D89A6769B5B6169708CF812E06F008A3086
|texte= The clinical success and periodontal evaluation of patients rehabilitated with light‐cured obturators
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |