Marginal bone levels at single tooth implants with a conical fixture design. The influence of surface macro‐ and microstructure
Identifieur interne : 002662 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 002661; suivant : 002663Marginal bone levels at single tooth implants with a conical fixture design. The influence of surface macro‐ and microstructure
Auteurs : Michael R. NortonSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 1998-04.
Abstract
The concept of a conical implant design to accommodate single tooth replacement, has previously been shown to result in excessive bone loss, around the machined titanium conical collar, usually down to the 1st thread. This unusually aggressive loss of bone was shown to occur within a short period of time, post loading, with greater than 3 mm of bone loss occurring within the 1st 6 months to 1 year. The influence of implant design, surface texture and microleakage have all been highlighted as a potential cause. A modification of the surface structure, both at the macroscopic and microscopic level, as well as an altered fixture‐abutment interface design has resulted in the maintenance of marginal bone around a single tooth titanium implant with a similar conical design. The radiographic follow‐up of 33 implants loaded for up to 4 years, has revealed, by comparison, a most favourable maintenance of marginal bone around the conical collar, with a mean marginal bone loss of 0.32 mm mesially and 0.34 mm distally for the whole group. The cumulative mean marginal bone loss mesially and distally is 0.42 mm and 0.40 mm from 1 to 2 years, 0.54 mm and 0.43 mm from 2 to 3 years, 0.51 mm and 0.24 mm from 3 to 4 years, and 0.62 mm and 0.60 mm for implants past their 4 year recall.
Url:
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090204.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:4E4A09312E83EC120E1B5DD2EA0233C36D91792DLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Marginal bone levels at single tooth implants with a conical fixture design. The influence of surface macro‐ and microstructure</title><author><name sortKey="Norton, Michael R" sort="Norton, Michael R" uniqKey="Norton M" first="Michael R." last="Norton">Michael R. Norton</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dept of Maxillofacial Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, London; Dept of Maxillo‐facial Surgery, Bedford Hospital, Bedford; and in private practice, London, U.K.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:4E4A09312E83EC120E1B5DD2EA0233C36D91792D</idno><date when="1998" year="1998">1998</date><idno type="doi">10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090204.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/4E4A09312E83EC120E1B5DD2EA0233C36D91792D/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002662</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002662</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Marginal bone levels at single tooth implants with a conical fixture design. The influence of surface macro‐ and microstructure</title><author><name sortKey="Norton, Michael R" sort="Norton, Michael R" uniqKey="Norton M" first="Michael R." last="Norton">Michael R. Norton</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dept of Maxillofacial Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, London; Dept of Maxillo‐facial Surgery, Bedford Hospital, Bedford; and in private practice, London, U.K.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">9</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="91">91</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="99">99</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1998-04">1998-04</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The concept of a conical implant design to accommodate single tooth replacement, has previously been shown to result in excessive bone loss, around the machined titanium conical collar, usually down to the 1st thread. This unusually aggressive loss of bone was shown to occur within a short period of time, post loading, with greater than 3 mm of bone loss occurring within the 1st 6 months to 1 year. The influence of implant design, surface texture and microleakage have all been highlighted as a potential cause. A modification of the surface structure, both at the macroscopic and microscopic level, as well as an altered fixture‐abutment interface design has resulted in the maintenance of marginal bone around a single tooth titanium implant with a similar conical design. The radiographic follow‐up of 33 implants loaded for up to 4 years, has revealed, by comparison, a most favourable maintenance of marginal bone around the conical collar, with a mean marginal bone loss of 0.32 mm mesially and 0.34 mm distally for the whole group. The cumulative mean marginal bone loss mesially and distally is 0.42 mm and 0.40 mm from 1 to 2 years, 0.54 mm and 0.43 mm from 2 to 3 years, 0.51 mm and 0.24 mm from 3 to 4 years, and 0.62 mm and 0.60 mm for implants past their 4 year recall.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Michael R. Norton</name><affiliations><json:string>Dept of Maxillofacial Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, London; Dept of Maxillo‐facial Surgery, Bedford Hospital, Bedford; and in private practice, London, U.K.</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>surface roughness</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>marginal bone level</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>titanium implant</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>single tooth replacement</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR090204</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-Q0Z35KWN-7</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>The concept of a conical implant design to accommodate single tooth replacement, has previously been shown to result in excessive bone loss, around the machined titanium conical collar, usually down to the 1st thread. This unusually aggressive loss of bone was shown to occur within a short period of time, post loading, with greater than 3 mm of bone loss occurring within the 1st 6 months to 1 year. The influence of implant design, surface texture and microleakage have all been highlighted as a potential cause. A modification of the surface structure, both at the macroscopic and microscopic level, as well as an altered fixture‐abutment interface design has resulted in the maintenance of marginal bone around a single tooth titanium implant with a similar conical design. The radiographic follow‐up of 33 implants loaded for up to 4 years, has revealed, by comparison, a most favourable maintenance of marginal bone around the conical collar, with a mean marginal bone loss of 0.32 mm mesially and 0.34 mm distally for the whole group. The cumulative mean marginal bone loss mesially and distally is 0.42 mm and 0.40 mm from 1 to 2 years, 0.54 mm and 0.43 mm from 2 to 3 years, 0.51 mm and 0.24 mm from 3 to 4 years, and 0.62 mm and 0.60 mm for implants past their 4 year recall.</abstract><qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>224</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1286</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>4</keywordCount><score>4.738</score><pdfWordCount>0</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>0</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>9</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>565 x 779 pts</pdfPageSize></qualityIndicators><title>Marginal bone levels at single tooth implants with a conical fixture design. The influence of surface macro‐ and microstructure</title><pmid><json:string>9663036</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><pages><first>91</first><last>99</last></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1998</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName></persName><placeName></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-Q0Z35KWN-7</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string><json:string>4 - otorhinolaryngologie. stomatologie</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>1998</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1998</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090204.x</json:string></doi><id>4E4A09312E83EC120E1B5DD2EA0233C36D91792D</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/4E4A09312E83EC120E1B5DD2EA0233C36D91792D/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>ocr</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/ocr</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/4E4A09312E83EC120E1B5DD2EA0233C36D91792D/fulltext/ocr</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/4E4A09312E83EC120E1B5DD2EA0233C36D91792D/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/4E4A09312E83EC120E1B5DD2EA0233C36D91792D/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Marginal bone levels at single tooth implants with a conical fixture design. The influence of surface macro‐ and microstructure</title><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1998-04"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Marginal bone levels at single tooth implants with a conical fixture design. The influence of surface macro‐ and microstructure</title><title level="a" type="short">Marginal bone levels and single tooth implants</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Michael R.</forename><surname>Norton</surname></persName><affiliation>Dept of Maxillofacial Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, London; Dept of Maxillo‐facial Surgery, Bedford Hospital, Bedford; and in private practice, London, U.K.</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">4E4A09312E83EC120E1B5DD2EA0233C36D91792D</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-Q0Z35KWN-7</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090204.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLR090204</idno><idno type="supplier"></idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR090204.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.1998.9.issue-2</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">9</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="91">91</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="99">99</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1998-04"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p>The concept of a conical implant design to accommodate single tooth replacement, has previously been shown to result in excessive bone loss, around the machined titanium conical collar, usually down to the 1st thread. This unusually aggressive loss of bone was shown to occur within a short period of time, post loading, with greater than 3 mm of bone loss occurring within the 1st 6 months to 1 year. The influence of implant design, surface texture and microleakage have all been highlighted as a potential cause. A modification of the surface structure, both at the macroscopic and microscopic level, as well as an altered fixture‐abutment interface design has resulted in the maintenance of marginal bone around a single tooth titanium implant with a similar conical design. The radiographic follow‐up of 33 implants loaded for up to 4 years, has revealed, by comparison, a most favourable maintenance of marginal bone around the conical collar, with a mean marginal bone loss of 0.32 mm mesially and 0.34 mm distally for the whole group. The cumulative mean marginal bone loss mesially and distally is 0.42 mm and 0.40 mm from 1 to 2 years, 0.54 mm and 0.43 mm from 2 to 3 years, 0.51 mm and 0.24 mm from 3 to 4 years, and 0.62 mm and 0.60 mm for implants past their 4 year recall.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">surface roughness</term><term xml:id="k2">marginal bone level</term><term xml:id="k3">titanium implant</term><term xml:id="k4">single tooth replacement</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change>undefined</change><change>[object Object]</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/4E4A09312E83EC120E1B5DD2EA0233C36D91792D/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley component found"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisherName><publisherLoc>Copenhagen</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="04002"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.1998.9.issue-2</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="9">9</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="2">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="1998-04">April 1998</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0009100" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090204.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR090204"></id><id type="supplier" value=""></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2001-12-25"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2001-12-25"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:Header result:Header" date="2010-03-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="91">91</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="99">99</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Michael R. Norton, 2 Devonshire Place, London WlN 1PA, UK.</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR090204.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted for publication 7 August 1997</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Marginal bone levels at single tooth implants with a conical fixture design. The influence of surface macro‐ and microstructure</title><title type="shortAuthors">Norton</title><title type="short">Marginal bone levels and single tooth implants</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Michael R.</givenNames><familyName>Norton</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation>Dept of Maxillofacial Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, London; Dept of Maxillo‐facial Surgery, Bedford Hospital, Bedford; and in private practice, London, U.K.</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">surface roughness</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">marginal bone level</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">titanium implant</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">single tooth replacement</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>The concept of a conical implant design to accommodate single tooth replacement, has previously been shown to result in excessive bone loss, around the machined titanium conical collar, usually down to the 1st thread. This unusually aggressive loss of bone was shown to occur within a short period of time, post loading, with greater than 3 mm of bone loss occurring within the 1st 6 months to 1 year. The influence of implant design, surface texture and microleakage have all been highlighted as a potential cause. A modification of the surface structure, both at the macroscopic and microscopic level, as well as an altered fixture‐abutment interface design has resulted in the maintenance of marginal bone around a single tooth titanium implant with a similar conical design. The radiographic follow‐up of 33 implants loaded for up to 4 years, has revealed, by comparison, a most favourable maintenance of marginal bone around the conical collar, with a mean marginal bone loss of 0.32 mm mesially and 0.34 mm distally for the whole group. The cumulative mean marginal bone loss mesially and distally is 0.42 mm and 0.40 mm from 1 to 2 years, 0.54 mm and 0.43 mm from 2 to 3 years, 0.51 mm and 0.24 mm from 3 to 4 years, and 0.62 mm and 0.60 mm for implants past their 4 year recall.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Marginal bone levels at single tooth implants with a conical fixture design. The influence of surface macro‐ and microstructure</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Marginal bone levels and single tooth implants</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Marginal bone levels at single tooth implants with a conical fixture design. The influence of surface macro‐ and microstructure</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Michael R.</namePart><namePart type="family">Norton</namePart><affiliation>Dept of Maxillofacial Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, London; Dept of Maxillo‐facial Surgery, Bedford Hospital, Bedford; and in private practice, London, U.K.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Copenhagen</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1998-04</dateIssued><edition>Accepted for publication 7 August 1997</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1998</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">The concept of a conical implant design to accommodate single tooth replacement, has previously been shown to result in excessive bone loss, around the machined titanium conical collar, usually down to the 1st thread. This unusually aggressive loss of bone was shown to occur within a short period of time, post loading, with greater than 3 mm of bone loss occurring within the 1st 6 months to 1 year. The influence of implant design, surface texture and microleakage have all been highlighted as a potential cause. A modification of the surface structure, both at the macroscopic and microscopic level, as well as an altered fixture‐abutment interface design has resulted in the maintenance of marginal bone around a single tooth titanium implant with a similar conical design. The radiographic follow‐up of 33 implants loaded for up to 4 years, has revealed, by comparison, a most favourable maintenance of marginal bone around the conical collar, with a mean marginal bone loss of 0.32 mm mesially and 0.34 mm distally for the whole group. The cumulative mean marginal bone loss mesially and distally is 0.42 mm and 0.40 mm from 1 to 2 years, 0.54 mm and 0.43 mm from 2 to 3 years, 0.51 mm and 0.24 mm from 3 to 4 years, and 0.62 mm and 0.60 mm for implants past their 4 year recall.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>surface roughness</topic><topic>marginal bone level</topic><topic>titanium implant</topic><topic>single tooth replacement</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>1998</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>9</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>91</start><end>99</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">4E4A09312E83EC120E1B5DD2EA0233C36D91792D</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-Q0Z35KWN-7</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090204.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR090204</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Munksgaard International Publishers</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/4E4A09312E83EC120E1B5DD2EA0233C36D91792D/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002662 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002662 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:4E4A09312E83EC120E1B5DD2EA0233C36D91792D
|texte= Marginal bone levels at single tooth implants with a conical fixture design. The influence of surface macro‐ and microstructure
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |