The significance of the integumentary profile
Identifieur interne : 002394 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 002393; suivant : 002395The significance of the integumentary profile
Auteurs : Somchai Satravaha ; Med. Dent ; K. Dieter SchlegelSource :
- American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics [ 0889-5406 ] ; 1987.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Angle orthod, Asian population sample, Caucasian, Chinese origin, Esthetic, Esthetic line, Esthetic plane, Ethnic group, Facial, Facial esthetics, Facial pattern, Facial profile, Geniolabial angle, Individual variability, Javanese, Javanese group, Javanese population, Javanese subjects, Javanese thai, Lateral photographs, Limited value, Nasolabial, Nasolabial angle, Nasolabial angle analysis, Nursing college, Orthod, Orthognathic, Orthognathic profile, Other thai group, Overall profile, Overall profile analysis, Posterior position, Profile, Profile analysis, Profile flow analysis, Profile form, Profile form analysis, Profile forms, Prognathic, Prognathic face, Prognathic profile, Retrognathic profiles, Ricketts, Significant difference, Thai, Thai girl, Thai groups, Thai population, Treatment planning.
- Teeft :
- Angle orthod, Asian population sample, Caucasian, Chinese origin, Esthetic, Esthetic line, Esthetic plane, Ethnic group, Facial, Facial esthetics, Facial pattern, Facial profile, Geniolabial angle, Individual variability, Javanese, Javanese group, Javanese population, Javanese subjects, Javanese thai, Lateral photographs, Limited value, Nasolabial, Nasolabial angle, Nasolabial angle analysis, Nursing college, Orthod, Orthognathic, Orthognathic profile, Other thai group, Overall profile, Overall profile analysis, Posterior position, Profile, Profile analysis, Profile flow analysis, Profile form, Profile form analysis, Profile forms, Prognathic, Prognathic face, Prognathic profile, Retrognathic profiles, Ricketts, Significant difference, Thai, Thai girl, Thai groups, Thai population, Treatment planning.
Abstract
Abstract: Profile analysis was performed on 180 Thai female subjects with ages ranging from 16 to 21 years. Seventy were of Chinese origin. The determination of the profile analysis mean values was based on the methods of Schwarz, Subtelny, Ricketts, Burstone, and Schwartz. The results were compared to Caucasian standards and to the findings of our previous study on a Javanese population. For the profile forms, our investigated groups showed mainly prognathic faces (75% to 84%). A “shift backward” profile flow dominated. We found a “prognathic face” combined with a “shift backward” in 50% to 60% of the Asian subjects analyzed. Our soft-tissue profile results (approximately 165 ± 6°) showed less convexity than that of the Caucasians and there was no significant difference in overall profile between the 2 Thai groups (approximately 134 ± 5°); this is in the range given by Subtelny (141° to 131°) except for that of the Javanese subjects. For the lip analysis, we listed a posterior position or a lip position upon the esthetic line between 60% to 70% of both Thai groups with respect to the upper lip and only 28% to 33% for the lower lip. The Javanese group, however, showed 90% anterior position of the upper lip and 93% of the lower lip to this line. It is significant that proper blending of the integumentary profile produces an esthetically pleasing face and this varies in different ethnic groups. A good combination could even make a “prognathic face shift backward” very acceptable as illustrated by a profile analysis of Miss Thailand, 1984. We encourage studies in different ethnic groups to obtain orthodontic mean values to be used as diagnostic aids and in treatment planning instead of always using a westernized movie star image for the patients of other races.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/0889-5406(87)90263-0
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:49229B6514EC5A8472D4F3973B80FC810905804FLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>The significance of the integumentary profile</title><author><name sortKey="Satravaha, Somchai" sort="Satravaha, Somchai" uniqKey="Satravaha S" first="Somchai" last="Satravaha">Somchai Satravaha</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Bangkok, Thailand</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Dent, Med" sort="Dent, Med" uniqKey="Dent M" first="Med." last="Dent">Med. Dent</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Bangkok, Thailand</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schlegel, K Dieter" sort="Schlegel, K Dieter" uniqKey="Schlegel K" first="K. Dieter" last="Schlegel">K. Dieter Schlegel</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Bangkok, Thailand</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:49229B6514EC5A8472D4F3973B80FC810905804F</idno><date when="1987" year="1987">1987</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/0889-5406(87)90263-0</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/49229B6514EC5A8472D4F3973B80FC810905804F/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002394</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002394</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">The significance of the integumentary profile</title><author><name sortKey="Satravaha, Somchai" sort="Satravaha, Somchai" uniqKey="Satravaha S" first="Somchai" last="Satravaha">Somchai Satravaha</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Bangkok, Thailand</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Dent, Med" sort="Dent, Med" uniqKey="Dent M" first="Med." last="Dent">Med. Dent</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Bangkok, Thailand</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schlegel, K Dieter" sort="Schlegel, K Dieter" uniqKey="Schlegel K" first="K. Dieter" last="Schlegel">K. Dieter Schlegel</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Bangkok, Thailand</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">YMOD</title><idno type="ISSN">0889-5406</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1987">1987</date><biblScope unit="volume">92</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="422">422</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="426">426</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0889-5406</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0889-5406</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Angle orthod</term><term>Asian population sample</term><term>Caucasian</term><term>Chinese origin</term><term>Esthetic</term><term>Esthetic line</term><term>Esthetic plane</term><term>Ethnic group</term><term>Facial</term><term>Facial esthetics</term><term>Facial pattern</term><term>Facial profile</term><term>Geniolabial angle</term><term>Individual variability</term><term>Javanese</term><term>Javanese group</term><term>Javanese population</term><term>Javanese subjects</term><term>Javanese thai</term><term>Lateral photographs</term><term>Limited value</term><term>Nasolabial</term><term>Nasolabial angle</term><term>Nasolabial angle analysis</term><term>Nursing college</term><term>Orthod</term><term>Orthognathic</term><term>Orthognathic profile</term><term>Other thai group</term><term>Overall profile</term><term>Overall profile analysis</term><term>Posterior position</term><term>Profile</term><term>Profile analysis</term><term>Profile flow analysis</term><term>Profile form</term><term>Profile form analysis</term><term>Profile forms</term><term>Prognathic</term><term>Prognathic face</term><term>Prognathic profile</term><term>Retrognathic profiles</term><term>Ricketts</term><term>Significant difference</term><term>Thai</term><term>Thai girl</term><term>Thai groups</term><term>Thai population</term><term>Treatment planning</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Angle orthod</term><term>Asian population sample</term><term>Caucasian</term><term>Chinese origin</term><term>Esthetic</term><term>Esthetic line</term><term>Esthetic plane</term><term>Ethnic group</term><term>Facial</term><term>Facial esthetics</term><term>Facial pattern</term><term>Facial profile</term><term>Geniolabial angle</term><term>Individual variability</term><term>Javanese</term><term>Javanese group</term><term>Javanese population</term><term>Javanese subjects</term><term>Javanese thai</term><term>Lateral photographs</term><term>Limited value</term><term>Nasolabial</term><term>Nasolabial angle</term><term>Nasolabial angle analysis</term><term>Nursing college</term><term>Orthod</term><term>Orthognathic</term><term>Orthognathic profile</term><term>Other thai group</term><term>Overall profile</term><term>Overall profile analysis</term><term>Posterior position</term><term>Profile</term><term>Profile analysis</term><term>Profile flow analysis</term><term>Profile form</term><term>Profile form analysis</term><term>Profile forms</term><term>Prognathic</term><term>Prognathic face</term><term>Prognathic profile</term><term>Retrognathic profiles</term><term>Ricketts</term><term>Significant difference</term><term>Thai</term><term>Thai girl</term><term>Thai groups</term><term>Thai population</term><term>Treatment planning</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: Profile analysis was performed on 180 Thai female subjects with ages ranging from 16 to 21 years. Seventy were of Chinese origin. The determination of the profile analysis mean values was based on the methods of Schwarz, Subtelny, Ricketts, Burstone, and Schwartz. The results were compared to Caucasian standards and to the findings of our previous study on a Javanese population. For the profile forms, our investigated groups showed mainly prognathic faces (75% to 84%). A “shift backward” profile flow dominated. We found a “prognathic face” combined with a “shift backward” in 50% to 60% of the Asian subjects analyzed. Our soft-tissue profile results (approximately 165 ± 6°) showed less convexity than that of the Caucasians and there was no significant difference in overall profile between the 2 Thai groups (approximately 134 ± 5°); this is in the range given by Subtelny (141° to 131°) except for that of the Javanese subjects. For the lip analysis, we listed a posterior position or a lip position upon the esthetic line between 60% to 70% of both Thai groups with respect to the upper lip and only 28% to 33% for the lower lip. The Javanese group, however, showed 90% anterior position of the upper lip and 93% of the lower lip to this line. It is significant that proper blending of the integumentary profile produces an esthetically pleasing face and this varies in different ethnic groups. A good combination could even make a “prognathic face shift backward” very acceptable as illustrated by a profile analysis of Miss Thailand, 1984. We encourage studies in different ethnic groups to obtain orthodontic mean values to be used as diagnostic aids and in treatment planning instead of always using a westernized movie star image for the patients of other races.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>elsevier</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>thai</json:string><json:string>javanese</json:string><json:string>prognathic</json:string><json:string>orthod</json:string><json:string>nasolabial</json:string><json:string>orthognathic</json:string><json:string>ricketts</json:string><json:string>esthetic plane</json:string><json:string>treatment planning</json:string><json:string>thai population</json:string><json:string>overall profile</json:string><json:string>chinese origin</json:string><json:string>thai groups</json:string><json:string>prognathic profile</json:string><json:string>profile forms</json:string><json:string>javanese population</json:string><json:string>caucasian</json:string><json:string>esthetic line</json:string><json:string>profile analysis</json:string><json:string>overall profile analysis</json:string><json:string>angle orthod</json:string><json:string>thai girl</json:string><json:string>profile form</json:string><json:string>lateral photographs</json:string><json:string>facial</json:string><json:string>profile</json:string><json:string>nasolabial angle</json:string><json:string>geniolabial angle</json:string><json:string>profile form analysis</json:string><json:string>javanese group</json:string><json:string>facial esthetics</json:string><json:string>posterior position</json:string><json:string>nursing college</json:string><json:string>facial profile</json:string><json:string>javanese subjects</json:string><json:string>orthognathic profile</json:string><json:string>limited value</json:string><json:string>retrognathic profiles</json:string><json:string>profile flow analysis</json:string><json:string>asian population sample</json:string><json:string>javanese thai</json:string><json:string>prognathic face</json:string><json:string>nasolabial angle analysis</json:string><json:string>individual variability</json:string><json:string>other thai group</json:string><json:string>facial pattern</json:string><json:string>ethnic group</json:string><json:string>significant difference</json:string><json:string>esthetic</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Somchai Satravaha D.D.S.</name><affiliations><json:string>Bangkok, Thailand</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Med. Dent</name><affiliations><json:string>Bangkok, Thailand</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>K.Dieter Schlegel M.D., D.D.S.</name><affiliations><json:string>Bangkok, Thailand</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><arkIstex>ark:/67375/6H6-V81X216C-8</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>Full-length article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Abstract: Profile analysis was performed on 180 Thai female subjects with ages ranging from 16 to 21 years. Seventy were of Chinese origin. The determination of the profile analysis mean values was based on the methods of Schwarz, Subtelny, Ricketts, Burstone, and Schwartz. The results were compared to Caucasian standards and to the findings of our previous study on a Javanese population. For the profile forms, our investigated groups showed mainly prognathic faces (75% to 84%). A “shift backward” profile flow dominated. We found a “prognathic face” combined with a “shift backward” in 50% to 60% of the Asian subjects analyzed. Our soft-tissue profile results (approximately 165 ± 6°) showed less convexity than that of the Caucasians and there was no significant difference in overall profile between the 2 Thai groups (approximately 134 ± 5°); this is in the range given by Subtelny (141° to 131°) except for that of the Javanese subjects. For the lip analysis, we listed a posterior position or a lip position upon the esthetic line between 60% to 70% of both Thai groups with respect to the upper lip and only 28% to 33% for the lower lip. The Javanese group, however, showed 90% anterior position of the upper lip and 93% of the lower lip to this line. It is significant that proper blending of the integumentary profile produces an esthetically pleasing face and this varies in different ethnic groups. A good combination could even make a “prognathic face shift backward” very acceptable as illustrated by a profile analysis of Miss Thailand, 1984. We encourage studies in different ethnic groups to obtain orthodontic mean values to be used as diagnostic aids and in treatment planning instead of always using a westernized movie star image for the patients of other races.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.3</score><pdfWordCount>2300</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>14763</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>5</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>576 x 792 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>296</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1788</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>0</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>The significance of the integumentary profile</title><pmid><json:string>3479010</json:string></pmid><pii><json:string>0889-5406(87)90263-0</json:string></pii><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><title>American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><publicationDate>1987</publicationDate><issn><json:string>0889-5406</json:string></issn><pii><json:string>S0889-5406(00)X0056-X</json:string></pii><volume>92</volume><issue>5</issue><pages><first>422</first><last>426</last></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1987</json:string><json:string>1984</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Department, University University of Munich</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Thailand</json:string><json:string>Thai Fig</json:string><json:string>K. Dieter</json:string><json:string>Elke Chapman</json:string><json:string>J. Orthod</json:string><json:string>Kent Moshiri</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Thailand</json:string><json:string>Bangkok</json:string><json:string>Frankfort</json:string><json:string>Indonesia</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/6H6-V81X216C-8</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - General Medicine</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Orthodontics</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>1987</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1987</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1016/0889-5406(87)90263-0</json:string></doi><id>49229B6514EC5A8472D4F3973B80FC810905804F</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/49229B6514EC5A8472D4F3973B80FC810905804F/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/49229B6514EC5A8472D4F3973B80FC810905804F/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/49229B6514EC5A8472D4F3973B80FC810905804F/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a">The significance of the integumentary profile</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><availability><p>ELSEVIER</p></availability><date>1987</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content">Section title: Original article</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a">The significance of the integumentary profile</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Somchai</forename><surname>Satravaha</surname></persName><roleName type="degree">D.D.S.</roleName><note type="biography">Reprint requests to: Dr. S. Satravaha 343, Soi Monsin 1 Urupong Bangkok 10400/Thailand</note><affiliation>Reprint requests to: Dr. S. Satravaha 343, Soi Monsin 1 Urupong Bangkok 10400/Thailand</affiliation><affiliation>Bangkok, Thailand</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Med.</forename><surname>Dent</surname></persName><note type="biography">Dr.</note><note type="biography">Formerly Orthodontic Resident in Orthodontic Department, University of Freiburg, Zahnirztin fiir Kieferorthopidie.</note><affiliation>Dr.</affiliation><affiliation>Formerly Orthodontic Resident in Orthodontic Department, University of Freiburg, Zahnirztin fiir Kieferorthopidie.</affiliation><affiliation>Bangkok, Thailand</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">K.Dieter</forename><surname>Schlegel</surname></persName><roleName type="degree">M.D., D.D.S.</roleName><note type="biography">Professor, Maxillo-Facial Surgery Department, University of Munich.</note><affiliation>Professor, Maxillo-Facial Surgery Department, University of Munich.</affiliation><affiliation>Bangkok, Thailand</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">49229B6514EC5A8472D4F3973B80FC810905804F</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/0889-5406(87)90263-0</idno><idno type="PII">0889-5406(87)90263-0</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j">American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">YMOD</title><idno type="pISSN">0889-5406</idno><idno type="PII">S0889-5406(00)X0056-X</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1987"></date><biblScope unit="volume">92</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="422">422</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="426">426</biblScope></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1987</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Profile analysis was performed on 180 Thai female subjects with ages ranging from 16 to 21 years. Seventy were of Chinese origin. The determination of the profile analysis mean values was based on the methods of Schwarz, Subtelny, Ricketts, Burstone, and Schwartz. The results were compared to Caucasian standards and to the findings of our previous study on a Javanese population. For the profile forms, our investigated groups showed mainly prognathic faces (75% to 84%). A “shift backward” profile flow dominated. We found a “prognathic face” combined with a “shift backward” in 50% to 60% of the Asian subjects analyzed. Our soft-tissue profile results (approximately 165 ± 6°) showed less convexity than that of the Caucasians and there was no significant difference in overall profile between the 2 Thai groups (approximately 134 ± 5°); this is in the range given by Subtelny (141° to 131°) except for that of the Javanese subjects. For the lip analysis, we listed a posterior position or a lip position upon the esthetic line between 60% to 70% of both Thai groups with respect to the upper lip and only 28% to 33% for the lower lip. The Javanese group, however, showed 90% anterior position of the upper lip and 93% of the lower lip to this line. It is significant that proper blending of the integumentary profile produces an esthetically pleasing face and this varies in different ethnic groups. A good combination could even make a “prognathic face shift backward” very acceptable as illustrated by a profile analysis of Miss Thailand, 1984. We encourage studies in different ethnic groups to obtain orthodontic mean values to be used as diagnostic aids and in treatment planning instead of always using a westernized movie star image for the patients of other races.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1987">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/49229B6514EC5A8472D4F3973B80FC810905804F/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Elsevier, elements deleted: tail"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//ES//DTD journal article DTD version 4.5.2//EN//XML" URI="art452.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><converted-article version="4.5.2" docsubtype="fla"><item-info><jid>YMOD</jid><aid>87902630</aid><ce:pii>0889-5406(87)90263-0</ce:pii><ce:doi>10.1016/0889-5406(87)90263-0</ce:doi><ce:copyright type="unknown" year="1987"></ce:copyright></item-info><head><ce:dochead><ce:textfn>Original article</ce:textfn></ce:dochead><ce:title>The significance of the integumentary profile</ce:title><ce:author-group><ce:author><ce:given-name>Somchai</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Satravaha</ce:surname><ce:degrees>D.D.S.</ce:degrees><ce:cross-ref refid="COR1"><ce:sup>1</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF1"><ce:sup>a</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF2"><ce:sup>b</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>Med.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Dent</ce:surname><ce:roles>Dr.</ce:roles><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF1"><ce:sup>a</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF2"><ce:sup>b</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="FN1"><ce:sup>∗</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>K.Dieter</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Schlegel</ce:surname><ce:degrees>M.D., D.D.S.</ce:degrees><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF1"><ce:sup>a</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF2"><ce:sup>b</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="FN2"><ce:sup>∗∗</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:affiliation id="AFF1"><ce:label>a</ce:label><ce:textfn>Bangkok, Thailand</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation><ce:affiliation id="AFF2"><ce:label>b</ce:label><ce:textfn>Munich, West Germany</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation><ce:correspondence id="COR1"><ce:label>1</ce:label><ce:text>Reprint requests to: Dr. S. Satravaha 343, Soi Monsin 1 Urupong Bangkok 10400/Thailand</ce:text></ce:correspondence><ce:footnote id="FN1"><ce:label>∗</ce:label><ce:note-para>Formerly Orthodontic Resident in Orthodontic Department, University of Freiburg, Zahnirztin fiir Kieferorthopidie.</ce:note-para></ce:footnote><ce:footnote id="FN2"><ce:label>∗∗</ce:label><ce:note-para>Professor, Maxillo-Facial Surgery Department, University of Munich.</ce:note-para></ce:footnote></ce:author-group><ce:abstract><ce:section-title>Abstract</ce:section-title><ce:abstract-sec><ce:simple-para>Profile analysis was performed on 180 Thai female subjects with ages ranging from 16 to 21 years. Seventy were of Chinese origin. The determination of the profile analysis mean values was based on the methods of Schwarz, Subtelny, Ricketts, Burstone, and Schwartz. The results were compared to Caucasian standards and to the findings of our previous study on a Javanese population. For the profile forms, our investigated groups showed mainly prognathic faces (75% to 84%). A “shift backward” profile flow dominated. We found a “prognathic face” combined with a “shift backward” in 50% to 60% of the Asian subjects analyzed. Our soft-tissue profile results (approximately 165 ± 6°) showed less convexity than that of the Caucasians and there was no significant difference in overall profile between the 2 Thai groups (approximately 134 ± 5°); this is in the range given by Subtelny (141° to 131°) except for that of the Javanese subjects. For the lip analysis, we listed a posterior position or a lip position upon the esthetic line between 60% to 70% of both Thai groups with respect to the upper lip and only 28% to 33% for the lower lip. The Javanese group, however, showed 90% anterior position of the upper lip and 93% of the lower lip to this line. It is significant that proper blending of the integumentary profile produces an esthetically pleasing face and this varies in different ethnic groups. A good combination could even make a “prognathic face shift backward” very acceptable as illustrated by a profile analysis of Miss Thailand, 1984. We encourage studies in different ethnic groups to obtain orthodontic mean values to be used as diagnostic aids and in treatment planning instead of always using a westernized movie star image for the patients of other races.</ce:simple-para></ce:abstract-sec></ce:abstract></head></converted-article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo><title>The significance of the integumentary profile</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA"><title>The significance of the integumentary profile</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Somchai</namePart><namePart type="family">Satravaha</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">D.D.S.</namePart><affiliation>Bangkok, Thailand</affiliation><description>Reprint requests to: Dr. S. Satravaha 343, Soi Monsin 1 Urupong Bangkok 10400/Thailand</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Med.</namePart><namePart type="family">Dent</namePart><description>Dr.</description><affiliation>Bangkok, Thailand</affiliation><description>Formerly Orthodontic Resident in Orthodontic Department, University of Freiburg, Zahnirztin fiir Kieferorthopidie.</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">K.Dieter</namePart><namePart type="family">Schlegel</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">M.D., D.D.S.</namePart><affiliation>Bangkok, Thailand</affiliation><description>Professor, Maxillo-Facial Surgery Department, University of Munich.</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="Full-length article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1987</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1987</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><abstract lang="en">Abstract: Profile analysis was performed on 180 Thai female subjects with ages ranging from 16 to 21 years. Seventy were of Chinese origin. The determination of the profile analysis mean values was based on the methods of Schwarz, Subtelny, Ricketts, Burstone, and Schwartz. The results were compared to Caucasian standards and to the findings of our previous study on a Javanese population. For the profile forms, our investigated groups showed mainly prognathic faces (75% to 84%). A “shift backward” profile flow dominated. We found a “prognathic face” combined with a “shift backward” in 50% to 60% of the Asian subjects analyzed. Our soft-tissue profile results (approximately 165 ± 6°) showed less convexity than that of the Caucasians and there was no significant difference in overall profile between the 2 Thai groups (approximately 134 ± 5°); this is in the range given by Subtelny (141° to 131°) except for that of the Javanese subjects. For the lip analysis, we listed a posterior position or a lip position upon the esthetic line between 60% to 70% of both Thai groups with respect to the upper lip and only 28% to 33% for the lower lip. The Javanese group, however, showed 90% anterior position of the upper lip and 93% of the lower lip to this line. It is significant that proper blending of the integumentary profile produces an esthetically pleasing face and this varies in different ethnic groups. A good combination could even make a “prognathic face shift backward” very acceptable as illustrated by a profile analysis of Miss Thailand, 1984. We encourage studies in different ethnic groups to obtain orthodontic mean values to be used as diagnostic aids and in treatment planning instead of always using a westernized movie star image for the patients of other races.</abstract><note type="content">Section title: Original article</note><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>YMOD</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">198711</dateIssued></originInfo><identifier type="ISSN">0889-5406</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0889-5406(00)X0056-X</identifier><part><date>198711</date><detail type="volume"><number>92</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="issue"><number>5</number><caption>no.</caption></detail><extent unit="issue-pages"><start>A25</start><end>A30</end></extent><extent unit="issue-pages"><start>A3</start><end>A24</end></extent><extent unit="issue-pages"><start>365</start><end>454</end></extent><extent unit="pages"><start>422</start><end>426</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">49229B6514EC5A8472D4F3973B80FC810905804F</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/6H6-V81X216C-8</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1016/0889-5406(87)90263-0</identifier><identifier type="PII">0889-5406(87)90263-0</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-HKKZVM7B-M">elsevier</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/49229B6514EC5A8472D4F3973B80FC810905804F/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002394 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002394 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:49229B6514EC5A8472D4F3973B80FC810905804F
|texte= The significance of the integumentary profile
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |