Gingival recession defects and guided tissue regeneration: a review
Identifieur interne : 002393 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 002392; suivant : 002394Gingival recession defects and guided tissue regeneration: a review
Auteurs : Michael J. Danesh-Meyer ; Ulf M. E. WikesjöSource :
- Journal of Periodontal Research [ 0022-3484 ] ; 2001-12.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Alveolar bone, Bioabsorbable, Bioabsorbable membrane, Biomaterials, Bioresorbable, Bioresorbable membranes, Buccal, Clin, Clin periodontol, Clinical attachment level, Clinical trials, Closure, Connective tissue attachment, Connective tissue graft, Coronally, Cortellini, Defect, Dent, Double papilla, Eptfe, Eptfe membrane, Eptfe membranes, Free gingival graft, Gingiva, Gingival, Gingival recession, Gingival recession defect, Gingival recession defects, Gingival recession depth, Graft, Guidor, Histologic, Human gingival recession defects, Keratinized gingiva, Membrane, Membrane exposure, Membrane exposures, Membrane placement, Membrane removal, Miller class, Months postsurgery, Mucogingival, Mucoperiosteal, Nonresorbable, Nonresorbable membranes, Periodontal, Periodontal repair, Periodontics, Periodontol, Pini, Pini prato, Polylactic, Polylactic acid, Postsurgery, Prato, Primary wound closure, Protocol, Recession, Regeneration, Roccuzzo, Root conditioning, Root coverage, Root planing, Root surface, Root surfaces, Scabbia, Smoker, Space maintenance, Space provision, Surgical, Surgical control, Surgical protocol, Sutured, Tatakis, Tatakis trombelli, Tetracycline, Tinti, Tissue graft, Tissue regeneration, Tissue regeneration procedures, Trapezoidal, Trapezoidal mucoperiosteal, Trombelli, Vincenzi, Weeks postsurgery, Wikesjo.
- Teeft :
- Alveolar bone, Bioabsorbable, Bioabsorbable membrane, Biomaterials, Bioresorbable, Bioresorbable membranes, Buccal, Clin, Clin periodontol, Clinical attachment level, Clinical trials, Closure, Connective tissue attachment, Connective tissue graft, Coronally, Cortellini, Defect, Dent, Double papilla, Eptfe, Eptfe membrane, Eptfe membranes, Free gingival graft, Gingiva, Gingival, Gingival recession, Gingival recession defect, Gingival recession defects, Gingival recession depth, Graft, Guidor, Histologic, Human gingival recession defects, Keratinized gingiva, Membrane, Membrane exposure, Membrane exposures, Membrane placement, Membrane removal, Miller class, Months postsurgery, Mucogingival, Mucoperiosteal, Nonresorbable, Nonresorbable membranes, Periodontal, Periodontal repair, Periodontics, Periodontol, Pini, Pini prato, Polylactic, Polylactic acid, Postsurgery, Prato, Primary wound closure, Protocol, Recession, Regeneration, Roccuzzo, Root conditioning, Root coverage, Root planing, Root surface, Root surfaces, Scabbia, Smoker, Space maintenance, Space provision, Surgical, Surgical control, Surgical protocol, Sutured, Tatakis, Tatakis trombelli, Tetracycline, Tinti, Tissue graft, Tissue regeneration, Tissue regeneration procedures, Trapezoidal, Trapezoidal mucoperiosteal, Trombelli, Vincenzi, Weeks postsurgery, Wikesjo.
Abstract
The last decade has seen an increasing number of clinical reports on guided tissue regeneration (GTR) for reconstruction of gingival recession defects. This article reviews the value of GTR in the management of gingival recession defects based on records from such reports. Studies and case‐series using nonresorbable and bioresorbable membranes, studies comparing GTR to the subepithelial connective tissue graft (CTG) procedure, and histologic reports of healing following GTR, published in the English language from 1985 to 2000, were identified using a Medline search and were included in the data‐base for this review. The following pre‐ and post‐treatment data were collated and evaluated for each of the reports: gingival recession depth, probing depth, clinical attachment level, and width of the keratinized gingiva. In perspective of the limitations of the studies reviewed, it has been shown that GTR may be used for reconstruction of gingival recession defects. Importantly, it has not been shown that GTR provides an added clinical benefit for the patient treatment planned for reconstruction of gingival recession defects, i.e. GTR does not appear to offer a significant advantage over mucogingival procedures such as the connective tissue graft or the advanced flap procedure. It is imperative to recognize inherent technical difficulties associated with GTR including primary wound closure and secondary membrane exposure; membrane exposures being negatively correlated to desired clinical outcomes. Also, membrane exposures appear consistently more common in smokers than in non‐smokers. It is also imperative to recognize shortcomings and adverse effects including space maintenance and unacceptable foreign body reactions associated with some bioresorbable GTR technologies.
Url:
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0765.2001.360601.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:49220342FFCB5242180EB64C358C0C49A7CD5E00Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Gingival recession defects and guided tissue regeneration: a review</title><author><name sortKey="Danesh Eyer, Michael J" sort="Danesh Eyer, Michael J" uniqKey="Danesh Eyer M" first="Michael J." last="Danesh-Meyer">Michael J. Danesh-Meyer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Laboratory for Applied Periodontal and Craniofacial Regeneration, Temple University School of Dentistry, Philadelphia, PA, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wikesjo, Ulf M E" sort="Wikesjo, Ulf M E" uniqKey="Wikesjo U" first="Ulf M. E." last="Wikesjö">Ulf M. E. Wikesjö</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Laboratory for Applied Periodontal and Craniofacial Regeneration, Temple University School of Dentistry, Philadelphia, PA, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:49220342FFCB5242180EB64C358C0C49A7CD5E00</idno><date when="2001" year="2001">2001</date><idno type="doi">10.1034/j.1600-0765.2001.360601.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/49220342FFCB5242180EB64C358C0C49A7CD5E00/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002393</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002393</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Gingival recession defects and guided tissue regeneration: a review</title><author><name sortKey="Danesh Eyer, Michael J" sort="Danesh Eyer, Michael J" uniqKey="Danesh Eyer M" first="Michael J." last="Danesh-Meyer">Michael J. Danesh-Meyer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Laboratory for Applied Periodontal and Craniofacial Regeneration, Temple University School of Dentistry, Philadelphia, PA, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wikesjo, Ulf M E" sort="Wikesjo, Ulf M E" uniqKey="Wikesjo U" first="Ulf M. E." last="Wikesjö">Ulf M. E. Wikesjö</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Laboratory for Applied Periodontal and Craniofacial Regeneration, Temple University School of Dentistry, Philadelphia, PA, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Periodontal Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0022-3484</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0765</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">36</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="341">341</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="354">354</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">14</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2001-12">2001-12</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0022-3484</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0022-3484</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar bone</term><term>Bioabsorbable</term><term>Bioabsorbable membrane</term><term>Biomaterials</term><term>Bioresorbable</term><term>Bioresorbable membranes</term><term>Buccal</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin periodontol</term><term>Clinical attachment level</term><term>Clinical trials</term><term>Closure</term><term>Connective tissue attachment</term><term>Connective tissue graft</term><term>Coronally</term><term>Cortellini</term><term>Defect</term><term>Dent</term><term>Double papilla</term><term>Eptfe</term><term>Eptfe membrane</term><term>Eptfe membranes</term><term>Free gingival graft</term><term>Gingiva</term><term>Gingival</term><term>Gingival recession</term><term>Gingival recession defect</term><term>Gingival recession defects</term><term>Gingival recession depth</term><term>Graft</term><term>Guidor</term><term>Histologic</term><term>Human gingival recession defects</term><term>Keratinized gingiva</term><term>Membrane</term><term>Membrane exposure</term><term>Membrane exposures</term><term>Membrane placement</term><term>Membrane removal</term><term>Miller class</term><term>Months postsurgery</term><term>Mucogingival</term><term>Mucoperiosteal</term><term>Nonresorbable</term><term>Nonresorbable membranes</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontal repair</term><term>Periodontics</term><term>Periodontol</term><term>Pini</term><term>Pini prato</term><term>Polylactic</term><term>Polylactic acid</term><term>Postsurgery</term><term>Prato</term><term>Primary wound closure</term><term>Protocol</term><term>Recession</term><term>Regeneration</term><term>Roccuzzo</term><term>Root conditioning</term><term>Root coverage</term><term>Root planing</term><term>Root surface</term><term>Root surfaces</term><term>Scabbia</term><term>Smoker</term><term>Space maintenance</term><term>Space provision</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical control</term><term>Surgical protocol</term><term>Sutured</term><term>Tatakis</term><term>Tatakis trombelli</term><term>Tetracycline</term><term>Tinti</term><term>Tissue graft</term><term>Tissue regeneration</term><term>Tissue regeneration procedures</term><term>Trapezoidal</term><term>Trapezoidal mucoperiosteal</term><term>Trombelli</term><term>Vincenzi</term><term>Weeks postsurgery</term><term>Wikesjo</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar bone</term><term>Bioabsorbable</term><term>Bioabsorbable membrane</term><term>Biomaterials</term><term>Bioresorbable</term><term>Bioresorbable membranes</term><term>Buccal</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin periodontol</term><term>Clinical attachment level</term><term>Clinical trials</term><term>Closure</term><term>Connective tissue attachment</term><term>Connective tissue graft</term><term>Coronally</term><term>Cortellini</term><term>Defect</term><term>Dent</term><term>Double papilla</term><term>Eptfe</term><term>Eptfe membrane</term><term>Eptfe membranes</term><term>Free gingival graft</term><term>Gingiva</term><term>Gingival</term><term>Gingival recession</term><term>Gingival recession defect</term><term>Gingival recession defects</term><term>Gingival recession depth</term><term>Graft</term><term>Guidor</term><term>Histologic</term><term>Human gingival recession defects</term><term>Keratinized gingiva</term><term>Membrane</term><term>Membrane exposure</term><term>Membrane exposures</term><term>Membrane placement</term><term>Membrane removal</term><term>Miller class</term><term>Months postsurgery</term><term>Mucogingival</term><term>Mucoperiosteal</term><term>Nonresorbable</term><term>Nonresorbable membranes</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontal repair</term><term>Periodontics</term><term>Periodontol</term><term>Pini</term><term>Pini prato</term><term>Polylactic</term><term>Polylactic acid</term><term>Postsurgery</term><term>Prato</term><term>Primary wound closure</term><term>Protocol</term><term>Recession</term><term>Regeneration</term><term>Roccuzzo</term><term>Root conditioning</term><term>Root coverage</term><term>Root planing</term><term>Root surface</term><term>Root surfaces</term><term>Scabbia</term><term>Smoker</term><term>Space maintenance</term><term>Space provision</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical control</term><term>Surgical protocol</term><term>Sutured</term><term>Tatakis</term><term>Tatakis trombelli</term><term>Tetracycline</term><term>Tinti</term><term>Tissue graft</term><term>Tissue regeneration</term><term>Tissue regeneration procedures</term><term>Trapezoidal</term><term>Trapezoidal mucoperiosteal</term><term>Trombelli</term><term>Vincenzi</term><term>Weeks postsurgery</term><term>Wikesjo</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The last decade has seen an increasing number of clinical reports on guided tissue regeneration (GTR) for reconstruction of gingival recession defects. This article reviews the value of GTR in the management of gingival recession defects based on records from such reports. Studies and case‐series using nonresorbable and bioresorbable membranes, studies comparing GTR to the subepithelial connective tissue graft (CTG) procedure, and histologic reports of healing following GTR, published in the English language from 1985 to 2000, were identified using a Medline search and were included in the data‐base for this review. The following pre‐ and post‐treatment data were collated and evaluated for each of the reports: gingival recession depth, probing depth, clinical attachment level, and width of the keratinized gingiva. In perspective of the limitations of the studies reviewed, it has been shown that GTR may be used for reconstruction of gingival recession defects. Importantly, it has not been shown that GTR provides an added clinical benefit for the patient treatment planned for reconstruction of gingival recession defects, i.e. GTR does not appear to offer a significant advantage over mucogingival procedures such as the connective tissue graft or the advanced flap procedure. It is imperative to recognize inherent technical difficulties associated with GTR including primary wound closure and secondary membrane exposure; membrane exposures being negatively correlated to desired clinical outcomes. Also, membrane exposures appear consistently more common in smokers than in non‐smokers. It is also imperative to recognize shortcomings and adverse effects including space maintenance and unacceptable foreign body reactions associated with some bioresorbable GTR technologies.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>gingival</json:string><json:string>gingival recession defects</json:string><json:string>root coverage</json:string><json:string>periodontol</json:string><json:string>postsurgery</json:string><json:string>trombelli</json:string><json:string>eptfe</json:string><json:string>months postsurgery</json:string><json:string>miller class</json:string><json:string>tissue regeneration</json:string><json:string>regeneration</json:string><json:string>bioresorbable</json:string><json:string>defect</json:string><json:string>periodontal</json:string><json:string>nonresorbable</json:string><json:string>eptfe membrane</json:string><json:string>mucoperiosteal</json:string><json:string>wikesjo</json:string><json:string>membrane</json:string><json:string>trapezoidal</json:string><json:string>bioresorbable membranes</json:string><json:string>prato</json:string><json:string>pini</json:string><json:string>guidor</json:string><json:string>tinti</json:string><json:string>mucogingival</json:string><json:string>graft</json:string><json:string>periodontics</json:string><json:string>histologic</json:string><json:string>tatakis</json:string><json:string>buccal</json:string><json:string>pini prato</json:string><json:string>nonresorbable membranes</json:string><json:string>smoker</json:string><json:string>scabbia</json:string><json:string>vincenzi</json:string><json:string>weeks postsurgery</json:string><json:string>surgical</json:string><json:string>root surface</json:string><json:string>biomaterials</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>bioabsorbable</json:string><json:string>polylactic</json:string><json:string>recession</json:string><json:string>gingiva</json:string><json:string>coronally</json:string><json:string>roccuzzo</json:string><json:string>bioabsorbable membrane</json:string><json:string>cortellini</json:string><json:string>membrane removal</json:string><json:string>root surfaces</json:string><json:string>membrane exposures</json:string><json:string>primary wound closure</json:string><json:string>tetracycline</json:string><json:string>membrane exposure</json:string><json:string>space maintenance</json:string><json:string>sutured</json:string><json:string>protocol</json:string><json:string>polylactic acid</json:string><json:string>eptfe membranes</json:string><json:string>tissue graft</json:string><json:string>connective tissue graft</json:string><json:string>trapezoidal mucoperiosteal</json:string><json:string>keratinized gingiva</json:string><json:string>connective tissue attachment</json:string><json:string>free gingival graft</json:string><json:string>clinical attachment level</json:string><json:string>gingival recession defect</json:string><json:string>surgical control</json:string><json:string>periodontal repair</json:string><json:string>space provision</json:string><json:string>alveolar bone</json:string><json:string>gingival recession</json:string><json:string>tatakis trombelli</json:string><json:string>root planing</json:string><json:string>membrane placement</json:string><json:string>clinical trials</json:string><json:string>gingival recession depth</json:string><json:string>root conditioning</json:string><json:string>double papilla</json:string><json:string>tissue regeneration procedures</json:string><json:string>human gingival recession defects</json:string><json:string>surgical protocol</json:string><json:string>clin periodontol</json:string><json:string>closure</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Michael J. Danesh‐Meyer</name><affiliations><json:string>Laboratory for Applied Periodontal and Craniofacial Regeneration, Temple University School of Dentistry, Philadelphia, PA, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Ulf M.E. Wikesjö</name><affiliations><json:string>Laboratory for Applied Periodontal and Craniofacial Regeneration, Temple University School of Dentistry, Philadelphia, PA, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>mucogingival procedures</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>gingival recession</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>guided tissue regeneration</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>gingival/connective tissue graft</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>rotational/advanced flap procedures</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>periodontal surgery</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>clinical trials, review</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>JRE360601</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-7PJXVXKN-6</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>reviewArticle</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>The last decade has seen an increasing number of clinical reports on guided tissue regeneration (GTR) for reconstruction of gingival recession defects. This article reviews the value of GTR in the management of gingival recession defects based on records from such reports. Studies and case‐series using nonresorbable and bioresorbable membranes, studies comparing GTR to the subepithelial connective tissue graft (CTG) procedure, and histologic reports of healing following GTR, published in the English language from 1985 to 2000, were identified using a Medline search and were included in the data‐base for this review. The following pre‐ and post‐treatment data were collated and evaluated for each of the reports: gingival recession depth, probing depth, clinical attachment level, and width of the keratinized gingiva. In perspective of the limitations of the studies reviewed, it has been shown that GTR may be used for reconstruction of gingival recession defects. Importantly, it has not been shown that GTR provides an added clinical benefit for the patient treatment planned for reconstruction of gingival recession defects, i.e. GTR does not appear to offer a significant advantage over mucogingival procedures such as the connective tissue graft or the advanced flap procedure. It is imperative to recognize inherent technical difficulties associated with GTR including primary wound closure and secondary membrane exposure; membrane exposures being negatively correlated to desired clinical outcomes. Also, membrane exposures appear consistently more common in smokers than in non‐smokers. It is also imperative to recognize shortcomings and adverse effects including space maintenance and unacceptable foreign body reactions associated with some bioresorbable GTR technologies.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>10</score><pdfWordCount>8086</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>56186</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>14</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595 x 791 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>257</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1793</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>7</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Gingival recession defects and guided tissue regeneration: a review</title><pmid><json:string>11762869</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>review-article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Periodontal Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0765</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0022-3484</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0765</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JRE</json:string></publisherId><volume>36</volume><issue>6</issue><pages><first>341</first><last>354</last><total>14</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2001</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Temple University</json:string><json:string>Calcitek Inc.</json:string><json:string>Laboratory for Applied Periodontal</json:string><json:string>Coletica Corp., Lyon, France</json:string><json:string>Ethicon, Inc., Seine, France</json:string><json:string>Associates, Inc.</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>The</json:string><json:string>W.L. Gore</json:string><json:string>M.E. Wikesjo</json:string><json:string>Pini</json:string><json:string>Leonardo Trombelli</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Philadelphia</json:string><json:string>Carlsbad</json:string><json:string>Parma</json:string><json:string>USA</json:string><json:string>CA</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string><json:string>PA</json:string></placeName><ref_url><json:string>http://www.temple.edu/dentistry/perio/ index.htm</json:string></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Vincenzi et al.</json:string><json:string>Amarante et al. 2000</json:string><json:string>Borghetti et al.</json:string><json:string>Prato et al. 1993</json:string><json:string>Trombelli et al. 1995</json:string><json:string>Department of Periodontology, 3223</json:string><json:string>Zucchelli et al.</json:string><json:string>Zahedi et al.</json:string><json:string>Matarasso et al.</json:string><json:string>Prato et al. 1992</json:string><json:string>Roccuzzo et al.</json:string><json:string>Prato et al.</json:string><json:string>Ricci et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Cortellini et al.</json:string><json:string>Zahedi et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Trombelli et al.</json:string><json:string>Matarasso et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Jepsen et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Jepsen et al.</json:string><json:string>Roccuzzo et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Trombelli et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Tinti et al.</json:string><json:string>Muller et al.</json:string><json:string>Rachlin et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Borghetti et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Zucchelli et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Amarante et al.</json:string><json:string>Trombelli et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Rachlin et al.</json:string><json:string>Ricci et al.</json:string><json:string>Shieh et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Tinti et al. 1992</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-7PJXVXKN-6</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Periodontics</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>2001</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2001</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1034/j.1600-0765.2001.360601.x</json:string></doi><id>49220342FFCB5242180EB64C358C0C49A7CD5E00</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/49220342FFCB5242180EB64C358C0C49A7CD5E00/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/49220342FFCB5242180EB64C358C0C49A7CD5E00/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/49220342FFCB5242180EB64C358C0C49A7CD5E00/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Gingival recession defects and guided tissue regeneration: a review</title><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2001-12"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="review-article" source="reviewArticle" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-L5L7X3NF-P">review-article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="review-article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Gingival recession defects and guided tissue regeneration: a review</title><title level="a" type="short">GTR and gingival recession defects</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Michael J.</forename><surname>Danesh‐Meyer</surname></persName><affiliation>Laboratory for Applied Periodontal and Craniofacial Regeneration, Temple University School of Dentistry, Philadelphia, PA, USA<address><country key="US"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Ulf M.E.</forename><surname>Wikesjö</surname></persName><affiliation>Laboratory for Applied Periodontal and Craniofacial Regeneration, Temple University School of Dentistry, Philadelphia, PA, USA<address><country key="US"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">49220342FFCB5242180EB64C358C0C49A7CD5E00</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-7PJXVXKN-6</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0765.2001.360601.x</idno><idno type="unit">JRE360601</idno><idno type="supplier">per017</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JRE.JRE360601.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Periodontal Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0022-3484</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0765</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0765</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/jre.2001.36.issue-6</idno><idno type="product">JRE</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">36</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="341">341</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="354">354</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">14</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2001-12"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p>The last decade has seen an increasing number of clinical reports on guided tissue regeneration (GTR) for reconstruction of gingival recession defects. This article reviews the value of GTR in the management of gingival recession defects based on records from such reports. Studies and case‐series using nonresorbable and bioresorbable membranes, studies comparing GTR to the subepithelial connective tissue graft (CTG) procedure, and histologic reports of healing following GTR, published in the English language from 1985 to 2000, were identified using a Medline search and were included in the data‐base for this review. The following pre‐ and post‐treatment data were collated and evaluated for each of the reports: gingival recession depth, probing depth, clinical attachment level, and width of the keratinized gingiva. In perspective of the limitations of the studies reviewed, it has been shown that GTR may be used for reconstruction of gingival recession defects. Importantly, it has not been shown that GTR provides an added clinical benefit for the patient treatment planned for reconstruction of gingival recession defects, i.e. GTR does not appear to offer a significant advantage over mucogingival procedures such as the connective tissue graft or the advanced flap procedure. It is imperative to recognize inherent technical difficulties associated with GTR including primary wound closure and secondary membrane exposure; membrane exposures being negatively correlated to desired clinical outcomes. Also, membrane exposures appear consistently more common in smokers than in non‐smokers. It is also imperative to recognize shortcomings and adverse effects including space maintenance and unacceptable foreign body reactions associated with some bioresorbable GTR technologies.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">mucogingival procedures</term><term xml:id="k2">gingival recession</term><term xml:id="k3">guided tissue regeneration</term><term xml:id="k4">gingival/connective tissue graft</term><term xml:id="k5">rotational/advanced flap procedures</term><term xml:id="k6">periodontal surgery</term><term xml:id="k7">clinical trials, review</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Short review</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change>undefined</change><change>[object Object]</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/49220342FFCB5242180EB64C358C0C49A7CD5E00/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley component found"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisherName><publisherLoc>Copenhagen</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0765</doi><issn type="print">0022-3484</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0765</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JRE"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH">Journal of Periodontal Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="12006"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/jre.2001.36.issue-6</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="36">36</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="6">6</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2001-12">December 2001</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="reviewArticle" position="0034100" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1034/j.1600-0765.2001.360601.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JRE360601"></id><id type="supplier" value="per017"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="14"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Short review</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2002-03-25"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2002-03-25"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:Header result:Header" date="2010-03-05"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-02-01"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-30"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="341">341</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="354">354</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Ulf M.E. Wikesjö, DDS, PhD, Temple University
School of Dentistry, Laboratory for Applied
Periodontal and Craniofacial Regeneration,
Department of Periodontology, 3223 North
Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA
Tel: +1 215 707 5320
Fax: +1 215 707 4223
e‐mail: <email>uwikesjo@dental.temple.edu</email>
website: <url href="http://www.temple.edu/dentistry/perio/index.htm">http://www.temple.edu/dentistry/perio/index.htm</url></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JRE.JRE360601.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted for publication December 15, 2000</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="0"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="0"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Gingival recession defects and guided tissue regeneration: a review</title><title type="shortAuthors"><i>Danesh‐Meyer & Wikesjö</i></title><title type="short"><i>GTR and gingival recession defects</i></title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Michael J.</givenNames><familyName>Danesh‐Meyer</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Ulf M.E.</givenNames><familyName>Wikesjö</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="US"><unparsedAffiliation>Laboratory for Applied Periodontal and Craniofacial Regeneration, Temple University School of Dentistry, Philadelphia, PA, USA</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">mucogingival procedures</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">gingival recession</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">guided tissue regeneration</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">gingival/connective tissue graft</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">rotational/advanced flap procedures</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">periodontal surgery</keyword><keyword xml:id="k7">clinical trials, review</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>The last decade has seen an increasing number of clinical reports on guided tissue regeneration (GTR) for reconstruction of gingival recession defects. This article reviews the value of GTR in the management of gingival recession defects based on records from such reports. Studies and case‐series using nonresorbable and bioresorbable membranes, studies comparing GTR to the subepithelial connective tissue graft (CTG) procedure, and histologic reports of healing following GTR, published in the English language from 1985 to 2000, were identified using a Medline search and were included in the data‐base for this review. The following pre‐ and post‐treatment data were collated and evaluated for each of the reports: gingival recession depth, probing depth, clinical attachment level, and width of the keratinized gingiva. In perspective of the limitations of the studies reviewed, it has been shown that GTR may be used for reconstruction of gingival recession defects. Importantly, it has not been shown that GTR provides an added clinical benefit for the patient treatment planned for reconstruction of gingival recession defects, i.e. GTR does not appear to offer a significant advantage over mucogingival procedures such as the connective tissue graft or the advanced flap procedure. It is imperative to recognize inherent technical difficulties associated with GTR including primary wound closure and secondary membrane exposure; membrane exposures being negatively correlated to desired clinical outcomes. Also, membrane exposures appear consistently more common in smokers than in non‐smokers. It is also imperative to recognize shortcomings and adverse effects including space maintenance and unacceptable foreign body reactions associated with some bioresorbable GTR technologies.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Gingival recession defects and guided tissue regeneration: a review</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>GTR and gingival recession defects</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Gingival recession defects and guided tissue regeneration: a review</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Michael J.</namePart><namePart type="family">Danesh‐Meyer</namePart><affiliation>Laboratory for Applied Periodontal and Craniofacial Regeneration, Temple University School of Dentistry, Philadelphia, PA, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Ulf M.E.</namePart><namePart type="family">Wikesjö</namePart><affiliation>Laboratory for Applied Periodontal and Craniofacial Regeneration, Temple University School of Dentistry, Philadelphia, PA, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="review-article" displayLabel="reviewArticle" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-L5L7X3NF-P">review-article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Copenhagen</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2001-12</dateIssued><edition>Accepted for publication December 15, 2000</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2001</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">0</extent><extent unit="tables">0</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">0</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent><extent unit="words">0</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">The last decade has seen an increasing number of clinical reports on guided tissue regeneration (GTR) for reconstruction of gingival recession defects. This article reviews the value of GTR in the management of gingival recession defects based on records from such reports. Studies and case‐series using nonresorbable and bioresorbable membranes, studies comparing GTR to the subepithelial connective tissue graft (CTG) procedure, and histologic reports of healing following GTR, published in the English language from 1985 to 2000, were identified using a Medline search and were included in the data‐base for this review. The following pre‐ and post‐treatment data were collated and evaluated for each of the reports: gingival recession depth, probing depth, clinical attachment level, and width of the keratinized gingiva. In perspective of the limitations of the studies reviewed, it has been shown that GTR may be used for reconstruction of gingival recession defects. Importantly, it has not been shown that GTR provides an added clinical benefit for the patient treatment planned for reconstruction of gingival recession defects, i.e. GTR does not appear to offer a significant advantage over mucogingival procedures such as the connective tissue graft or the advanced flap procedure. It is imperative to recognize inherent technical difficulties associated with GTR including primary wound closure and secondary membrane exposure; membrane exposures being negatively correlated to desired clinical outcomes. Also, membrane exposures appear consistently more common in smokers than in non‐smokers. It is also imperative to recognize shortcomings and adverse effects including space maintenance and unacceptable foreign body reactions associated with some bioresorbable GTR technologies.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>mucogingival procedures</topic><topic>gingival recession</topic><topic>guided tissue regeneration</topic><topic>gingival/connective tissue graft</topic><topic>rotational/advanced flap procedures</topic><topic>periodontal surgery</topic><topic>clinical trials, review</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Periodontal Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0022-3484</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0765</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0765</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JRE</identifier><part><date>2001</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>36</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>6</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>341</start><end>354</end><total>14</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">49220342FFCB5242180EB64C358C0C49A7CD5E00</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-7PJXVXKN-6</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0765.2001.360601.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JRE360601</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Munksgaard International Publishers</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/49220342FFCB5242180EB64C358C0C49A7CD5E00/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002393 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002393 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:49220342FFCB5242180EB64C358C0C49A7CD5E00
|texte= Gingival recession defects and guided tissue regeneration: a review
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |