A taxonomic revision of small dicynodonts with postcanine teeth
Identifieur interne : 002368 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 002367; suivant : 002369A taxonomic revision of small dicynodonts with postcanine teeth
Auteurs : Gillian M. King ; Bruce S. RubidgeSource :
- Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society [ 0024-4082 ] ; 1993-02.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adductor muscles, African museum, American museum, Anterior part, Assemblage, Assemblage zone, British museum, Broom, Caniniform, Caniniform tooth, Caniniform tusk, Caniniform tusks, Cluver, Cluver king, Coronoid eminence, Cranial morphology, Dentary, Dentary shelf, Dentary table, Dentary tables, Dicynodont, Dorsal, Dorsal view, Emydops, Emyduranus, Eodicynodon, Eumantellia, Former number, Fossil, Fossil reptilia, Genus, Genus pristerodon, Interpterygoid vacuity, Intertemporal, Intertemporal region, Janensch, Large palatines, Lateral, Lateral dentary shelf, Laterally, Main genera, Maxilla, Maxillary, Maxillary teeth, Medial, Median premaxillary ridge, Midline, Nasionale museum bloemfontein, Natural history, Nomen nudum, Oblique, Ofthe, Palatal, Palatal view, Palate, Palatine, Permian, Postcanine, Postcanine teeth, Posterior part, Premaxilla, Pristerodon, Pterygoid, Ramus, Reptile, Robertia, Robust, Rubidge, Rubidge figure, Skull, Skull length, Small teeth, Small toothed dicynodonts, Small toothed forms, Smaller teeth, Stratigraphic, Sulcus, Tapinocephalus zone, Toerien, Toothed, Toothed dicynodonts, Tusk, Valid genera.
- Teeft :
- Adductor muscles, African museum, American museum, Anterior part, Assemblage, Assemblage zone, British museum, Broom, Caniniform, Caniniform tooth, Caniniform tusk, Caniniform tusks, Cluver, Cluver king, Coronoid eminence, Cranial morphology, Dentary, Dentary shelf, Dentary table, Dentary tables, Dicynodont, Dorsal, Dorsal view, Emydops, Emyduranus, Eodicynodon, Eumantellia, Former number, Fossil, Fossil reptilia, Genus, Genus pristerodon, Interpterygoid vacuity, Intertemporal, Intertemporal region, Janensch, Large palatines, Lateral, Lateral dentary shelf, Laterally, Main genera, Maxilla, Maxillary, Maxillary teeth, Medial, Median premaxillary ridge, Midline, Nasionale museum bloemfontein, Natural history, Nomen nudum, Oblique, Ofthe, Palatal, Palatal view, Palate, Palatine, Permian, Postcanine, Postcanine teeth, Posterior part, Premaxilla, Pristerodon, Pterygoid, Ramus, Reptile, Robertia, Robust, Rubidge, Rubidge figure, Skull, Skull length, Small teeth, Small toothed dicynodonts, Small toothed forms, Smaller teeth, Stratigraphic, Sulcus, Tapinocephalus zone, Toerien, Toothed, Toothed dicynodonts, Tusk, Valid genera.
Abstract
The validity of 18 genera of small (skull length less than 150 mm) dicynodonts with postcanine teeth has been assessed. It is concluded that only four genera, Emydops, Eodicynodon, Robertia and Pristerodon, can be defined satisfactorily on the basis of well‐preserved and adequately prepared specimens. Of the remaining 14 genera, ten are not valid and may be accommodated within the four well‐characterized genera. Three additional genera (Chelyoposaurus, Koupia and Taognathus) should become nomina nuda since they are based on inadequately diagnosed material which in the case of the first two genera is now lost. Brachyprosopus, although based on a single somewhat inadequate specimen, is also considered valid although future examination of the type (not seen by us) may require reassessment of this opinion. We discuss briefly the nature of the taxonomic characters used, and the stratigraphic distribution of the four major genera.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1993.tb00218.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:48C05E7B4260BAF853922E7089C2C47AD8B2A4E9Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A taxonomic revision of small dicynodonts with postcanine teeth</title><author><name sortKey="King, Gillian M" sort="King, Gillian M" uniqKey="King G" first="Gillian M." last="King">Gillian M. King</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Karoo Palaeontology, South African Musuem, PO Box 61, Cape Town, 8000 South Africa</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Rubidge, Bruce S" sort="Rubidge, Bruce S" uniqKey="Rubidge B" first="Bruce S." last="Rubidge">Bruce S. Rubidge</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Research, University of the Witwatersrand, PO Wits, Johannesburg, 2050 South Africa</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:48C05E7B4260BAF853922E7089C2C47AD8B2A4E9</idno><date when="1993" year="1993">1993</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1096-3642.1993.tb00218.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/48C05E7B4260BAF853922E7089C2C47AD8B2A4E9/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002368</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002368</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A taxonomic revision of small dicynodonts with postcanine teeth</title><author><name sortKey="King, Gillian M" sort="King, Gillian M" uniqKey="King G" first="Gillian M." last="King">Gillian M. King</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Karoo Palaeontology, South African Musuem, PO Box 61, Cape Town, 8000 South Africa</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Rubidge, Bruce S" sort="Rubidge, Bruce S" uniqKey="Rubidge B" first="Bruce S." last="Rubidge">Bruce S. Rubidge</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Research, University of the Witwatersrand, PO Wits, Johannesburg, 2050 South Africa</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society</title><title level="j" type="alt">ZOOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY</title><idno type="ISSN">0024-4082</idno><idno type="eISSN">1096-3642</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">107</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="131">131</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="154">154</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">24</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1993-02">1993-02</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0024-4082</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0024-4082</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adductor muscles</term><term>African museum</term><term>American museum</term><term>Anterior part</term><term>Assemblage</term><term>Assemblage zone</term><term>British museum</term><term>Broom</term><term>Caniniform</term><term>Caniniform tooth</term><term>Caniniform tusk</term><term>Caniniform tusks</term><term>Cluver</term><term>Cluver king</term><term>Coronoid eminence</term><term>Cranial morphology</term><term>Dentary</term><term>Dentary shelf</term><term>Dentary table</term><term>Dentary tables</term><term>Dicynodont</term><term>Dorsal</term><term>Dorsal view</term><term>Emydops</term><term>Emyduranus</term><term>Eodicynodon</term><term>Eumantellia</term><term>Former number</term><term>Fossil</term><term>Fossil reptilia</term><term>Genus</term><term>Genus pristerodon</term><term>Interpterygoid vacuity</term><term>Intertemporal</term><term>Intertemporal region</term><term>Janensch</term><term>Large palatines</term><term>Lateral</term><term>Lateral dentary shelf</term><term>Laterally</term><term>Main genera</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maxillary teeth</term><term>Medial</term><term>Median premaxillary ridge</term><term>Midline</term><term>Nasionale museum bloemfontein</term><term>Natural history</term><term>Nomen nudum</term><term>Oblique</term><term>Ofthe</term><term>Palatal</term><term>Palatal view</term><term>Palate</term><term>Palatine</term><term>Permian</term><term>Postcanine</term><term>Postcanine teeth</term><term>Posterior part</term><term>Premaxilla</term><term>Pristerodon</term><term>Pterygoid</term><term>Ramus</term><term>Reptile</term><term>Robertia</term><term>Robust</term><term>Rubidge</term><term>Rubidge figure</term><term>Skull</term><term>Skull length</term><term>Small teeth</term><term>Small toothed dicynodonts</term><term>Small toothed forms</term><term>Smaller teeth</term><term>Stratigraphic</term><term>Sulcus</term><term>Tapinocephalus zone</term><term>Toerien</term><term>Toothed</term><term>Toothed dicynodonts</term><term>Tusk</term><term>Valid genera</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Adductor muscles</term><term>African museum</term><term>American museum</term><term>Anterior part</term><term>Assemblage</term><term>Assemblage zone</term><term>British museum</term><term>Broom</term><term>Caniniform</term><term>Caniniform tooth</term><term>Caniniform tusk</term><term>Caniniform tusks</term><term>Cluver</term><term>Cluver king</term><term>Coronoid eminence</term><term>Cranial morphology</term><term>Dentary</term><term>Dentary shelf</term><term>Dentary table</term><term>Dentary tables</term><term>Dicynodont</term><term>Dorsal</term><term>Dorsal view</term><term>Emydops</term><term>Emyduranus</term><term>Eodicynodon</term><term>Eumantellia</term><term>Former number</term><term>Fossil</term><term>Fossil reptilia</term><term>Genus</term><term>Genus pristerodon</term><term>Interpterygoid vacuity</term><term>Intertemporal</term><term>Intertemporal region</term><term>Janensch</term><term>Large palatines</term><term>Lateral</term><term>Lateral dentary shelf</term><term>Laterally</term><term>Main genera</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maxillary teeth</term><term>Medial</term><term>Median premaxillary ridge</term><term>Midline</term><term>Nasionale museum bloemfontein</term><term>Natural history</term><term>Nomen nudum</term><term>Oblique</term><term>Ofthe</term><term>Palatal</term><term>Palatal view</term><term>Palate</term><term>Palatine</term><term>Permian</term><term>Postcanine</term><term>Postcanine teeth</term><term>Posterior part</term><term>Premaxilla</term><term>Pristerodon</term><term>Pterygoid</term><term>Ramus</term><term>Reptile</term><term>Robertia</term><term>Robust</term><term>Rubidge</term><term>Rubidge figure</term><term>Skull</term><term>Skull length</term><term>Small teeth</term><term>Small toothed dicynodonts</term><term>Small toothed forms</term><term>Smaller teeth</term><term>Stratigraphic</term><term>Sulcus</term><term>Tapinocephalus zone</term><term>Toerien</term><term>Toothed</term><term>Toothed dicynodonts</term><term>Tusk</term><term>Valid genera</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The validity of 18 genera of small (skull length less than 150 mm) dicynodonts with postcanine teeth has been assessed. It is concluded that only four genera, Emydops, Eodicynodon, Robertia and Pristerodon, can be defined satisfactorily on the basis of well‐preserved and adequately prepared specimens. Of the remaining 14 genera, ten are not valid and may be accommodated within the four well‐characterized genera. Three additional genera (Chelyoposaurus, Koupia and Taognathus) should become nomina nuda since they are based on inadequately diagnosed material which in the case of the first two genera is now lost. Brachyprosopus, although based on a single somewhat inadequate specimen, is also considered valid although future examination of the type (not seen by us) may require reassessment of this opinion. We discuss briefly the nature of the taxonomic characters used, and the stratigraphic distribution of the four major genera.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>pristerodon</json:string><json:string>dentary</json:string><json:string>dicynodont</json:string><json:string>emydops</json:string><json:string>palatine</json:string><json:string>robertia</json:string><json:string>eodicynodon</json:string><json:string>rubidge</json:string><json:string>caniniform</json:string><json:string>palatal</json:string><json:string>toothed</json:string><json:string>genus</json:string><json:string>tusk</json:string><json:string>dorsal</json:string><json:string>maxilla</json:string><json:string>assemblage zone</json:string><json:string>maxillary</json:string><json:string>postcanine</json:string><json:string>cluver</json:string><json:string>medial</json:string><json:string>premaxilla</json:string><json:string>caniniform tusk</json:string><json:string>pterygoid</json:string><json:string>reptile</json:string><json:string>stratigraphic</json:string><json:string>postcanine teeth</json:string><json:string>ramus</json:string><json:string>toerien</json:string><json:string>lateral</json:string><json:string>toothed dicynodonts</json:string><json:string>emyduranus</json:string><json:string>lateral dentary shelf</json:string><json:string>sulcus</json:string><json:string>fossil</json:string><json:string>palatal view</json:string><json:string>eumantellia</json:string><json:string>midline</json:string><json:string>genus pristerodon</json:string><json:string>robust</json:string><json:string>laterally</json:string><json:string>ofthe</json:string><json:string>janensch</json:string><json:string>intertemporal</json:string><json:string>maxillary teeth</json:string><json:string>skull</json:string><json:string>skull length</json:string><json:string>african museum</json:string><json:string>dentary shelf</json:string><json:string>natural history</json:string><json:string>intertemporal region</json:string><json:string>cluver king</json:string><json:string>large palatines</json:string><json:string>dorsal view</json:string><json:string>broom</json:string><json:string>rubidge figure</json:string><json:string>median premaxillary ridge</json:string><json:string>tapinocephalus zone</json:string><json:string>interpterygoid vacuity</json:string><json:string>small toothed dicynodonts</json:string><json:string>assemblage</json:string><json:string>permian</json:string><json:string>palate</json:string><json:string>oblique</json:string><json:string>small teeth</json:string><json:string>former number</json:string><json:string>dentary tables</json:string><json:string>nasionale museum bloemfontein</json:string><json:string>anterior part</json:string><json:string>caniniform tooth</json:string><json:string>posterior part</json:string><json:string>nomen nudum</json:string><json:string>main genera</json:string><json:string>smaller teeth</json:string><json:string>coronoid eminence</json:string><json:string>adductor muscles</json:string><json:string>valid genera</json:string><json:string>american museum</json:string><json:string>caniniform tusks</json:string><json:string>british museum</json:string><json:string>dentary table</json:string><json:string>fossil reptilia</json:string><json:string>cranial morphology</json:string><json:string>small toothed forms</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>GILLIAN M. KING</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Karoo Palaeontology, South African Musuem, PO Box 61, Cape Town, 8000 South Africa</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>BRUCE S. RUBIDGE</name><affiliations><json:string>Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Research, University of the Witwatersrand, PO Wits, Johannesburg, 2050 South Africa</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Anomodont</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Emydops</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Eodicynodon</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Robertia</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Pristerodon</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>ZOJ131</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-LHS1NXRW-R</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>The validity of 18 genera of small (skull length less than 150 mm) dicynodonts with postcanine teeth has been assessed. It is concluded that only four genera, Emydops, Eodicynodon, Robertia and Pristerodon, can be defined satisfactorily on the basis of well‐preserved and adequately prepared specimens. Of the remaining 14 genera, ten are not valid and may be accommodated within the four well‐characterized genera. Three additional genera (Chelyoposaurus, Koupia and Taognathus) should become nomina nuda since they are based on inadequately diagnosed material which in the case of the first two genera is now lost. Brachyprosopus, although based on a single somewhat inadequate specimen, is also considered valid although future examination of the type (not seen by us) may require reassessment of this opinion. We discuss briefly the nature of the taxonomic characters used, and the stratigraphic distribution of the four major genera.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.704</score><pdfWordCount>7120</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>43867</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>24</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>504 x 720 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>142</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>938</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>A taxonomic revision of small dicynodonts with postcanine teeth</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1096-3642</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0024-4082</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1096-3642</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>ZOJ</json:string></publisherId><volume>107</volume><issue>2</issue><pages><first>131</first><last>154</last><total>24</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1992</json:string><json:string>1993</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Palaeonlological Research, Universip</json:string><json:string>South Africa Received Seplember</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName></persName><placeName></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-LHS1NXRW-R</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - zoology</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - natural sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - biology</json:string><json:string>3 - evolutionary biology</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Life Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Agricultural and Biological Sciences</json:string><json:string>3 - Animal Science and Zoology</json:string><json:string>1 - Life Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Agricultural and Biological Sciences</json:string><json:string>3 - Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences biologiques fondamentales et appliquees. psychologie</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>1993</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1993</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1096-3642.1993.tb00218.x</json:string></doi><id>48C05E7B4260BAF853922E7089C2C47AD8B2A4E9</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/48C05E7B4260BAF853922E7089C2C47AD8B2A4E9/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/48C05E7B4260BAF853922E7089C2C47AD8B2A4E9/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/48C05E7B4260BAF853922E7089C2C47AD8B2A4E9/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">A taxonomic revision of small dicynodonts with postcanine teeth</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1993-02"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A taxonomic revision of small dicynodonts with postcanine teeth</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">GILLIAN M.</forename><surname>KING</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Karoo Palaeontology, South African Musuem, PO Box 61, Cape Town, 8000 South Africa<address><country key="ZA"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">BRUCE S.</forename><surname>RUBIDGE</surname></persName><affiliation>Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Research, University of the Witwatersrand, PO Wits, Johannesburg, 2050 South Africa<address><country key="ZA"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">48C05E7B4260BAF853922E7089C2C47AD8B2A4E9</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-LHS1NXRW-R</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1096-3642.1993.tb00218.x</idno><idno type="unit">ZOJ131</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:ZOJ.ZOJ131.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society</title><title level="j" type="alt">ZOOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY</title><idno type="pISSN">0024-4082</idno><idno type="eISSN">1096-3642</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1096-3642</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/zoj.1993.107.issue-2</idno><idno type="product">ZOJ</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">107</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="131">131</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="154">154</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">24</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1993-02"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p>The validity of 18 genera of small (skull length less than 150 mm) dicynodonts with postcanine teeth has been assessed. It is concluded that only four genera, <hi rend="italic">Emydops, Eodicynodon, Robertia</hi> and <hi rend="italic">Pristerodon</hi>, can be defined satisfactorily on the basis of well‐preserved and adequately prepared specimens. Of the remaining 14 genera, ten are not valid and may be accommodated within the four well‐characterized genera. Three additional genera (<hi rend="italic">Chelyoposaurus, Koupia</hi> and <hi rend="italic">Taognathus</hi>) should become <hi rend="italic">nomina nuda</hi> since they are based on inadequately diagnosed material which in the case of the first two genera is now lost. <hi rend="italic">Brachyprosopus</hi>, although based on a single somewhat inadequate specimen, is also considered valid although future examination of the type (not seen by us) may require reassessment of this opinion.</p><p>We discuss briefly the nature of the taxonomic characters used, and the stratigraphic distribution of the four major genera.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">Anomodont</term><term xml:id="k2"><hi rend="italic">Emydops</hi></term><term xml:id="k3"><hi rend="italic">Eodicynodon</hi></term><term xml:id="k4"><hi rend="italic">Robertia</hi></term><term xml:id="k5"><hi rend="italic">Pristerodon</hi></term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Article</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/48C05E7B4260BAF853922E7089C2C47AD8B2A4E9/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1096-3642</doi><issn type="print">0024-4082</issn><issn type="electronic">1096-3642</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="ZOJ"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="ZOOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY">Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="02102"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/zoj.1993.107.issue-2</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="107">107</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="2">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="1993-02">February 1993</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0013100" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1096-3642.1993.tb00218.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="ZOJ131"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="24"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Article</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2008-06-28"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2008-06-28"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.9.3 mode:FullText" date="2011-09-07"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-02-11"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-11-04"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="131">131</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="154">154</numbering></numberingGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:ZOJ.ZOJ131.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Received September 1991, revised and accepted June 1992</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="referenceTotal" number="35"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="2"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">A taxonomic revision of small dicynodonts with postcanine teeth</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>GILLIAN M.</givenNames><familyName>KING</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>BRUCE S.</givenNames><familyName>RUBIDGE</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="ZA"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Karoo Palaeontology, South African Musuem, PO Box 61, Cape Town, 8000 South Africa</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="ZA"><unparsedAffiliation>Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Research, University of the Witwatersrand, PO Wits, Johannesburg, 2050 South Africa</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">Anomodont</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2"><i>Emydops</i></keyword><keyword xml:id="k3"><i>Eodicynodon</i></keyword><keyword xml:id="k4"><i>Robertia</i></keyword><keyword xml:id="k5"><i>Pristerodon</i></keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>The validity of 18 genera of small (skull length less than 150 mm) dicynodonts with postcanine teeth has been assessed. It is concluded that only four genera, <i>Emydops, Eodicynodon, Robertia</i> and <i>Pristerodon</i>, can be defined satisfactorily on the basis of well‐preserved and adequately prepared specimens. Of the remaining 14 genera, ten are not valid and may be accommodated within the four well‐characterized genera. Three additional genera (<i>Chelyoposaurus, Koupia</i> and <i>Taognathus</i>) should become <i>nomina nuda</i> since they are based on inadequately diagnosed material which in the case of the first two genera is now lost. <i>Brachyprosopus</i>, although based on a single somewhat inadequate specimen, is also considered valid although future examination of the type (not seen by us) may require reassessment of this opinion.</p><p>We discuss briefly the nature of the taxonomic characters used, and the stratigraphic distribution of the four major genera.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>A taxonomic revision of small dicynodonts with postcanine teeth</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>A taxonomic revision of small dicynodonts with postcanine teeth</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">GILLIAN M.</namePart><namePart type="family">KING</namePart><affiliation>Department of Karoo Palaeontology, South African Musuem, PO Box 61, Cape Town, 8000 South Africa</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">BRUCE S.</namePart><namePart type="family">RUBIDGE</namePart><affiliation>Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Research, University of the Witwatersrand, PO Wits, Johannesburg, 2050 South Africa</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1993-02</dateIssued><edition>Received September 1991, revised and accepted June 1992</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1993</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="references">35</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">2</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">The validity of 18 genera of small (skull length less than 150 mm) dicynodonts with postcanine teeth has been assessed. It is concluded that only four genera, Emydops, Eodicynodon, Robertia and Pristerodon, can be defined satisfactorily on the basis of well‐preserved and adequately prepared specimens. Of the remaining 14 genera, ten are not valid and may be accommodated within the four well‐characterized genera. Three additional genera (Chelyoposaurus, Koupia and Taognathus) should become nomina nuda since they are based on inadequately diagnosed material which in the case of the first two genera is now lost. Brachyprosopus, although based on a single somewhat inadequate specimen, is also considered valid although future examination of the type (not seen by us) may require reassessment of this opinion. We discuss briefly the nature of the taxonomic characters used, and the stratigraphic distribution of the four major genera.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>Anomodont</topic><topic>Emydops</topic><topic>Eodicynodon</topic><topic>Robertia</topic><topic>Pristerodon</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0024-4082</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1096-3642</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1096-3642</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">ZOJ</identifier><part><date>1993</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>107</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>131</start><end>154</end><total>24</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">48C05E7B4260BAF853922E7089C2C47AD8B2A4E9</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-LHS1NXRW-R</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1096-3642.1993.tb00218.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">ZOJ131</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/48C05E7B4260BAF853922E7089C2C47AD8B2A4E9/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002368 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002368 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:48C05E7B4260BAF853922E7089C2C47AD8B2A4E9
|texte= A taxonomic revision of small dicynodonts with postcanine teeth
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |