A comparison between immediate loading and immediate restoration in cases of partial posterior mandibular edentulism: a 3‐year randomized clinical trial
Identifieur interne : 000A38 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000A37; suivant : 000A39A comparison between immediate loading and immediate restoration in cases of partial posterior mandibular edentulism: a 3‐year randomized clinical trial
Auteurs : Marco Degidi ; Diego Nardi ; Adriano PiattelliSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2010-07.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Acrylic resin, Average insertion torque, Bone loss, Cannizzaro leone, Clinical implant dentistry, Control group, Degidi, Dental implants, Dentistry, Early loading, Edentulism, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Exclusion criteria, Full occlusal load, Glauser, Graphpad software, Healing period, Immediate loading, Immediate loading group, Immediate occlusal loading, Immediate rehabilitation, Immediate restoration, Immediate restoration group, Implant, Implant failure, Implant insertion, Implant placement, Implant stability quotient, Implant success, Implants research, Inclusion criteria, Insertion, Insertion torque, International journal, John wiley sons, Lateral excursions, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular edentulism, Marginal bone loss, Marginal gingiva, Mobile implant, Occlusal, Occlusal contact, Occlusal loading, Oral hygiene, Oral impl, Oral maxillofacial implants, Osseointegration process, Partial dentures, Periapical radiograph, Piattelli, Posterior mandible, Predictable procedure, Prospective multicenter study, Prosthetic dentistry, Quick calc, Randomized, Restoration, Sample size, Soft tissue, Soft tissue healing patterns, Surgery, Survival rate, Survival rates, Systematic review, Temporary restoration, Temporary restorations, Test group.
- Teeft :
- Acrylic resin, Average insertion torque, Bone loss, Cannizzaro leone, Clinical implant dentistry, Control group, Degidi, Dental implants, Dentistry, Early loading, Edentulism, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Exclusion criteria, Full occlusal load, Glauser, Graphpad software, Healing period, Immediate loading, Immediate loading group, Immediate occlusal loading, Immediate rehabilitation, Immediate restoration, Immediate restoration group, Implant, Implant failure, Implant insertion, Implant placement, Implant stability quotient, Implant success, Implants research, Inclusion criteria, Insertion, Insertion torque, International journal, John wiley sons, Lateral excursions, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular edentulism, Marginal bone loss, Marginal gingiva, Mobile implant, Occlusal, Occlusal contact, Occlusal loading, Oral hygiene, Oral impl, Oral maxillofacial implants, Osseointegration process, Partial dentures, Periapical radiograph, Piattelli, Posterior mandible, Predictable procedure, Prospective multicenter study, Prosthetic dentistry, Quick calc, Randomized, Restoration, Sample size, Soft tissue, Soft tissue healing patterns, Surgery, Survival rate, Survival rates, Systematic review, Temporary restoration, Temporary restorations, Test group.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the survival rate, the bone loss and soft‐tissue healing patterns of immediately loaded and immediately restored implants in cases of partial posterior mandibular edentulism.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01910.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:14DECA13BC58EC29F1FB06BC5C37DA6716D827BDLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A comparison between immediate loading and immediate restoration in cases of partial posterior mandibular edentulism: a 3‐year randomized clinical trial</title><author><name sortKey="Degidi, Marco" sort="Degidi, Marco" uniqKey="Degidi M" first="Marco" last="Degidi">Marco Degidi</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private Practice Bologna, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nardi, Diego" sort="Nardi, Diego" uniqKey="Nardi D" first="Diego" last="Nardi">Diego Nardi</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private Practice Bologna, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Piattelli, Adriano" sort="Piattelli, Adriano" uniqKey="Piattelli A" first="Adriano" last="Piattelli">Adriano Piattelli</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dental School, University of Chieti‐Pescara, Chieti, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:14DECA13BC58EC29F1FB06BC5C37DA6716D827BD</idno><date when="2010" year="2010">2010</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01910.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/14DECA13BC58EC29F1FB06BC5C37DA6716D827BD/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000A38</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000A38</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A comparison between immediate loading and immediate restoration in cases of partial posterior mandibular edentulism: a 3‐year randomized clinical trial</title><author><name sortKey="Degidi, Marco" sort="Degidi, Marco" uniqKey="Degidi M" first="Marco" last="Degidi">Marco Degidi</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private Practice Bologna, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nardi, Diego" sort="Nardi, Diego" uniqKey="Nardi D" first="Diego" last="Nardi">Diego Nardi</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private Practice Bologna, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Piattelli, Adriano" sort="Piattelli, Adriano" uniqKey="Piattelli A" first="Adriano" last="Piattelli">Adriano Piattelli</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dental School, University of Chieti‐Pescara, Chieti, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">21</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">7</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="682">682</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="687">687</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-07">2010-07</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Acrylic resin</term><term>Average insertion torque</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Cannizzaro leone</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Control group</term><term>Degidi</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Early loading</term><term>Edentulism</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Exclusion criteria</term><term>Full occlusal load</term><term>Glauser</term><term>Graphpad software</term><term>Healing period</term><term>Immediate loading</term><term>Immediate loading group</term><term>Immediate occlusal loading</term><term>Immediate rehabilitation</term><term>Immediate restoration</term><term>Immediate restoration group</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failure</term><term>Implant insertion</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant stability quotient</term><term>Implant success</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Inclusion criteria</term><term>Insertion</term><term>Insertion torque</term><term>International journal</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Lateral excursions</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular edentulism</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Marginal gingiva</term><term>Mobile implant</term><term>Occlusal</term><term>Occlusal contact</term><term>Occlusal loading</term><term>Oral hygiene</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Osseointegration process</term><term>Partial dentures</term><term>Periapical radiograph</term><term>Piattelli</term><term>Posterior mandible</term><term>Predictable procedure</term><term>Prospective multicenter study</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Quick calc</term><term>Randomized</term><term>Restoration</term><term>Sample size</term><term>Soft tissue</term><term>Soft tissue healing patterns</term><term>Surgery</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Survival rates</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Temporary restoration</term><term>Temporary restorations</term><term>Test group</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Acrylic resin</term><term>Average insertion torque</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Cannizzaro leone</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Control group</term><term>Degidi</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Early loading</term><term>Edentulism</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Exclusion criteria</term><term>Full occlusal load</term><term>Glauser</term><term>Graphpad software</term><term>Healing period</term><term>Immediate loading</term><term>Immediate loading group</term><term>Immediate occlusal loading</term><term>Immediate rehabilitation</term><term>Immediate restoration</term><term>Immediate restoration group</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failure</term><term>Implant insertion</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant stability quotient</term><term>Implant success</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Inclusion criteria</term><term>Insertion</term><term>Insertion torque</term><term>International journal</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Lateral excursions</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular edentulism</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Marginal gingiva</term><term>Mobile implant</term><term>Occlusal</term><term>Occlusal contact</term><term>Occlusal loading</term><term>Oral hygiene</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Osseointegration process</term><term>Partial dentures</term><term>Periapical radiograph</term><term>Piattelli</term><term>Posterior mandible</term><term>Predictable procedure</term><term>Prospective multicenter study</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Quick calc</term><term>Randomized</term><term>Restoration</term><term>Sample size</term><term>Soft tissue</term><term>Soft tissue healing patterns</term><term>Surgery</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Survival rates</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Temporary restoration</term><term>Temporary restorations</term><term>Test group</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the survival rate, the bone loss and soft‐tissue healing patterns of immediately loaded and immediately restored implants in cases of partial posterior mandibular edentulism.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>immediate loading</json:string><json:string>occlusal</json:string><json:string>degidi</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>piattelli</json:string><json:string>mandibular</json:string><json:string>edentulism</json:string><json:string>glauser</json:string><json:string>mandibular edentulism</json:string><json:string>immediate restoration</json:string><json:string>randomized</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>control group</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons</json:string><json:string>temporary restoration</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofacial implants</json:string><json:string>test group</json:string><json:string>oral impl</json:string><json:string>occlusal contact</json:string><json:string>survival rate</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>marginal bone loss</json:string><json:string>immediate restoration group</json:string><json:string>prosthetic dentistry</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string><json:string>implant insertion</json:string><json:string>early loading</json:string><json:string>insertion</json:string><json:string>soft tissue healing patterns</json:string><json:string>cannizzaro leone</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>implant failure</json:string><json:string>immediate loading group</json:string><json:string>graphpad software</json:string><json:string>full occlusal load</json:string><json:string>quick calc</json:string><json:string>occlusal loading</json:string><json:string>sample size</json:string><json:string>lateral excursions</json:string><json:string>restoration</json:string><json:string>surgery</json:string><json:string>average insertion torque</json:string><json:string>exclusion criteria</json:string><json:string>osseointegration process</json:string><json:string>systematic review</json:string><json:string>acrylic resin</json:string><json:string>inclusion criteria</json:string><json:string>soft tissue</json:string><json:string>oral hygiene</json:string><json:string>implant success</json:string><json:string>periapical radiograph</json:string><json:string>marginal gingiva</json:string><json:string>insertion torque</json:string><json:string>mobile implant</json:string><json:string>healing period</json:string><json:string>immediate rehabilitation</json:string><json:string>survival rates</json:string><json:string>temporary restorations</json:string><json:string>posterior mandible</json:string><json:string>prospective multicenter study</json:string><json:string>predictable procedure</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>immediate occlusal loading</json:string><json:string>implant stability quotient</json:string><json:string>partial dentures</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Marco Degidi</name><affiliations><json:string>Private Practice Bologna, Italy</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Diego Nardi</name><affiliations><json:string>Private Practice Bologna, Italy</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Adriano Piattelli</name><affiliations><json:string>Dental School, University of Chieti‐Pescara, Chieti, Italy</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>clinical research</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>clinical trials</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>prosthodontics</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>soft tissue–implant interactions</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR1910</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-F4RCVNNR-G</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the survival rate, the bone loss and soft‐tissue healing patterns of immediately loaded and immediately restored implants in cases of partial posterior mandibular edentulism.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.058</score><pdfWordCount>3662</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>24305</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>6</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>33</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>222</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>4</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>A comparison between immediate loading and immediate restoration in cases of partial posterior mandibular edentulism: a 3‐year randomized clinical trial</title><pmid><json:string>20412091</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>21</volume><issue>7</issue><pages><first>682</first><last>687</last><total>6</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>between February 2004 and October 2006</json:string><json:string>2002</json:string><json:string>2010</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>University of Chieti-Pescara</json:string><json:string>The International Journal</json:string><json:string>GraphPad Software Inc.</json:string><json:string>Chieti Italy Tel</json:string><json:string>The International</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Vita Zahnfabrik</json:string><json:string>H. Rauter</json:string><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>Gianluca Sighinol</json:string><json:string>Vita Physiodens</json:string><json:string>Diego Nardi</json:string><json:string>Adriano Piattelli</json:string><json:string>Via F. Sciucchi</json:string><json:string>La Jolla</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Austria</json:string><json:string>Mannheim</json:string><json:string>Helsinki</json:string><json:string>Bologna</json:string><json:string>Bad Sa</json:string><json:string>Italy</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string><json:string>Belgium</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Achilli et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Nkenke & Fenner 2006</json:string><json:string>Misch 1998</json:string><json:string>Degidi et al</json:string><json:string>Glauser et al. 2001</json:string><json:string>Glauser et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Testori et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Degidi et al. 2009a</json:string><json:string>Glauser et al. 2001, 2005, 2007</json:string><json:string>Ganeles et al. (2008)</json:string><json:string>Ganeles et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Meyer et al. (2003, 2004)</json:string><json:string>Degidi et al. 2009a, 2009b</json:string><json:string>Galli et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Schincaglia et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Degidi et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Cannizzaro & Leone 2003</json:string><json:string>Piattelli et al. 1998</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-F4RCVNNR-G</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2010</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2010</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01910.x</json:string></doi><id>14DECA13BC58EC29F1FB06BC5C37DA6716D827BD</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/14DECA13BC58EC29F1FB06BC5C37DA6716D827BD/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/14DECA13BC58EC29F1FB06BC5C37DA6716D827BD/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/14DECA13BC58EC29F1FB06BC5C37DA6716D827BD/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">A comparison between immediate loading and immediate restoration in cases of partial posterior mandibular edentulism: a 3‐year randomized clinical trial</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2010-07"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A comparison between immediate loading and immediate restoration in cases of partial posterior mandibular edentulism: a 3‐year randomized clinical trial</title><title level="a" type="short">Immediate loading vs. immediate restoration</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Marco</forename><surname>Degidi</surname></persName><affiliation>Private Practice Bologna, Italy<address><country key="IT"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Diego</forename><surname>Nardi</surname></persName><affiliation>Private Practice Bologna, Italy<address><country key="IT"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Adriano</forename><surname>Piattelli</surname></persName><affiliation>Dental School, University of Chieti‐Pescara, Chieti, Italy<address><country key="IT"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">14DECA13BC58EC29F1FB06BC5C37DA6716D827BD</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-F4RCVNNR-G</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01910.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLR1910</idno><idno type="supplier">1910</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR1910.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2010.21.issue-7</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">21</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">7</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="682">682</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="687">687</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-07"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>Abstract</head><p><hi rend="bold">Objective: </hi> The aim of this study was to compare the survival rate, the bone loss and soft‐tissue healing patterns of immediately loaded and immediately restored implants in cases of partial posterior mandibular edentulism.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Material and methods: </hi> Fifty patients with partial posterior mandibular edentulism were randomly selected for two treatments: 25 were included in the immediate loading group (test) and 25 in the immediate restoration group (control). All implants were placed in healed sites with a torque of >25 N cm. The temporary prosthesis of the immediate restoration group was placed so as to avoid occlusal contact in centric and lateral excursions. Both groups received fully occluding final restorations 6 months after surgery. Mean marginal bone loss was assessed at 6‐, 12‐, 24‐ and 36‐month follow‐up examinations by a blinded examiner.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results: </hi> A total of 100 implants were placed in the period between February 2004 and October 2006, of which 42 (42%) were for men and 58 (58%) for women. Five and 7 weeks after surgery, mobility of one implant was assessed in one (4%) patient in the test group and one (4%) patient in the control group, respectively. At the 36‐month follow‐up, the accumulated mean marginal bone loss was 0.987 mm (SD=0.375) for the immediate restoration group (<hi rend="italic">n</hi>=48) and 0.947 mm (SD=0.323) for the immediate loading group (<hi rend="italic">n</hi>=48). There was no statistically significant difference (<hi rend="italic">P</hi>>0.05) for the tested outcome measures between the two procedures.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusions: </hi> This study was unable to detect any statistically significant difference in the survival rate, bone loss and soft tissue healing patterns between the immediately loaded and the immediately restored implants in cases of partial posterior mandibular edentulism. The immediate temporary rehabilitation of the partially edentulous posterior mandible is a predictable procedure using both procedures.</p><p>
<hi rend="bold">To cite this article:</hi>
Degidi M, Nardi D, Piattelli A. A comparison between immediate loading and immediate restoration in cases of partial posterior mandibular edentulism: a 3‐year randomized clinical trial.
<hi rend="italic">Clin. Oral Impl. Res</hi>. <hi rend="bold">21</hi>, 2010; 682–687.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2009.01910.x</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">clinical research</term><term xml:id="k2">clinical trials</term><term xml:id="k3">prosthodontics</term><term xml:id="k4">soft tissue–implant interactions</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/14DECA13BC58EC29F1FB06BC5C37DA6716D827BD/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="07007"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2010.21.issue-7</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="21">21</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="7">7</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2010-07">July 2010</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="2" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01910.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR1910"></id><id type="supplier" value="1910"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="6"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2010-04-19"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2010-06-07"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.8 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-06-08"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="682">682</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="687">687</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><b>Corresponding author:</b>
<i>Prof. Adriano Piattelli</i>
Dental School, University of Chieti‐Pescara, Via F. Sciucchi 63
66100 Chieti
Italy
Tel.: +39 0871 3554076
Fax: 011 39 0871 3554076
e‐mail: <email normalForm="apiattelli@unich.it">apiattelli@unich.it</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR1910.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory><b>Date:</b> Accepted 5 December 2009</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="2"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="4"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="21"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="4833"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="21"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">A comparison between immediate loading and immediate restoration in cases of partial posterior mandibular edentulism: a 3‐year randomized clinical trial</title><title type="shortAuthors">Degidi et al.</title><title type="short">Immediate loading vs. immediate restoration</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Marco</givenNames><familyName>Degidi</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Diego</givenNames><familyName>Nardi</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Adriano</givenNames><familyName>Piattelli</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="IT"><unparsedAffiliation>Private Practice Bologna, Italy</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="IT"><unparsedAffiliation>Dental School, University of Chieti‐Pescara, Chieti, Italy</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">clinical research</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">clinical trials</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">prosthodontics</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">soft tissue–implant interactions</keyword></keywordGroup><supportingInformation><p><b>Table S1.</b> Supporting information in accordance with the CONSORT Statement 2001 checklist used in reporting randomized trials.</p><p>Please note: Wiley‐Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.</p><supportingInfoItem><mediaResource alt="supporting info item" href="urn-x:wiley:09057161:media:clr1910:CLR_1910_sm_table-s1"></mediaResource><caption>Supporting info item</caption></supportingInfoItem><supportingInfoItem><mediaResource alt="supporting info item" href="urn-x:wiley:09057161:media:clr1910:CLR_1910_sm_consortflow"></mediaResource><caption>Supporting info item</caption></supportingInfoItem></supportingInformation><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p><b>Objective: </b> The aim of this study was to compare the survival rate, the bone loss and soft‐tissue healing patterns of immediately loaded and immediately restored implants in cases of partial posterior mandibular edentulism.</p><p><b>Material and methods: </b> Fifty patients with partial posterior mandibular edentulism were randomly selected for two treatments: 25 were included in the immediate loading group (test) and 25 in the immediate restoration group (control). All implants were placed in healed sites with a torque of >25 N cm. The temporary prosthesis of the immediate restoration group was placed so as to avoid occlusal contact in centric and lateral excursions. Both groups received fully occluding final restorations 6 months after surgery. Mean marginal bone loss was assessed at 6‐, 12‐, 24‐ and 36‐month follow‐up examinations by a blinded examiner.</p><p><b>Results: </b> A total of 100 implants were placed in the period between February 2004 and October 2006, of which 42 (42%) were for men and 58 (58%) for women. Five and 7 weeks after surgery, mobility of one implant was assessed in one (4%) patient in the test group and one (4%) patient in the control group, respectively. At the 36‐month follow‐up, the accumulated mean marginal bone loss was 0.987 mm (SD=0.375) for the immediate restoration group (<i>n</i>=48) and 0.947 mm (SD=0.323) for the immediate loading group (<i>n</i>=48). There was no statistically significant difference (<i>P</i>>0.05) for the tested outcome measures between the two procedures.</p><p><b>Conclusions: </b> This study was unable to detect any statistically significant difference in the survival rate, bone loss and soft tissue healing patterns between the immediately loaded and the immediately restored implants in cases of partial posterior mandibular edentulism. The immediate temporary rehabilitation of the partially edentulous posterior mandible is a predictable procedure using both procedures.</p><p> <b>To cite this article:</b>
Degidi M, Nardi D, Piattelli A. A comparison between immediate loading and immediate restoration in cases of partial posterior mandibular edentulism: a 3‐year randomized clinical trial.
<i>Clin. Oral Impl. Res</i>. <b>21</b>, 2010; 682–687.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2009.01910.x</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>A comparison between immediate loading and immediate restoration in cases of partial posterior mandibular edentulism: a 3‐year randomized clinical trial</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Immediate loading vs. immediate restoration</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>A comparison between immediate loading and immediate restoration in cases of partial posterior mandibular edentulism: a 3‐year randomized clinical trial</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Marco</namePart><namePart type="family">Degidi</namePart><affiliation>Private Practice Bologna, Italy</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Diego</namePart><namePart type="family">Nardi</namePart><affiliation>Private Practice Bologna, Italy</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Adriano</namePart><namePart type="family">Piattelli</namePart><affiliation>Dental School, University of Chieti‐Pescara, Chieti, Italy</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2010-07</dateIssued><edition>Date: Accepted 5 December 2009</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">2</extent><extent unit="tables">4</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">21</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">21</extent><extent unit="words">4833</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the survival rate, the bone loss and soft‐tissue healing patterns of immediately loaded and immediately restored implants in cases of partial posterior mandibular edentulism.</abstract><abstract>Material and methods: Fifty patients with partial posterior mandibular edentulism were randomly selected for two treatments: 25 were included in the immediate loading group (test) and 25 in the immediate restoration group (control). All implants were placed in healed sites with a torque of >25 N cm. The temporary prosthesis of the immediate restoration group was placed so as to avoid occlusal contact in centric and lateral excursions. Both groups received fully occluding final restorations 6 months after surgery. Mean marginal bone loss was assessed at 6‐, 12‐, 24‐ and 36‐month follow‐up examinations by a blinded examiner.</abstract><abstract>Results: A total of 100 implants were placed in the period between February 2004 and October 2006, of which 42 (42%) were for men and 58 (58%) for women. Five and 7 weeks after surgery, mobility of one implant was assessed in one (4%) patient in the test group and one (4%) patient in the control group, respectively. At the 36‐month follow‐up, the accumulated mean marginal bone loss was 0.987 mm (SD=0.375) for the immediate restoration group (n=48) and 0.947 mm (SD=0.323) for the immediate loading group (n=48). There was no statistically significant difference (P>0.05) for the tested outcome measures between the two procedures.</abstract><abstract>Conclusions: This study was unable to detect any statistically significant difference in the survival rate, bone loss and soft tissue healing patterns between the immediately loaded and the immediately restored implants in cases of partial posterior mandibular edentulism. The immediate temporary rehabilitation of the partially edentulous posterior mandible is a predictable procedure using both procedures.</abstract><abstract>To cite this article:
Degidi M, Nardi D, Piattelli A. A comparison between immediate loading and immediate restoration in cases of partial posterior mandibular edentulism: a 3‐year randomized clinical trial.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 21, 2010; 682–687.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2009.01910.x</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>clinical research</topic><topic>clinical trials</topic><topic>prosthodontics</topic><topic>soft tissue–implant interactions</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><note type="content"> Table S1. Supporting information in accordance with the CONSORT Statement 2001 checklist used in reporting randomized trials. Please note: Wiley‐Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. Table S1. Supporting information in accordance with the CONSORT Statement 2001 checklist used in reporting randomized trials. Please note: Wiley‐Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.Supporting Info Item: Supporting info item - Supporting info item - </note><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2010</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>21</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>7</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>682</start><end>687</end><total>6</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">14DECA13BC58EC29F1FB06BC5C37DA6716D827BD</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-F4RCVNNR-G</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01910.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR1910</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/14DECA13BC58EC29F1FB06BC5C37DA6716D827BD/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000A38 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000A38 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:14DECA13BC58EC29F1FB06BC5C37DA6716D827BD
|texte= A comparison between immediate loading and immediate restoration in cases of partial posterior mandibular edentulism: a 3‐year randomized clinical trial
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |