The Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire: a pilot study
Identifieur interne : 000623 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000622; suivant : 000624The Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire: a pilot study
Auteurs : A. Pace-Balzan ; J. I. Cawood ; R. Howell ; D. Lowe ; S. N. RogersSource :
- Journal of Oral Rehabilitation [ 0305-182X ] ; 2004-06.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adjuvant radiotherapy, Aintree trust, Arch otolaryngol head neck surg, Blackwell publishing, British association, Cancer groups, Cancer patients, Clinical function, Consecutive patients, Conventional dentures, Denture, Denture domain, Endosteal implants, Eortc, European organisation, Experience problems, Facial, Facial appearance, Family eortc, Food particles, Full implant insertion, Full range, Good agreement, Head neck, Hrqol, Internal consistency, Likert scale, Liquids eortc, Liverpool, Lorq, Lower denture, Lower denture cause soreness, Lower dentures, Median correlation, Mouth dryness, Neck cancer, Neck cancer patients, Neck questionnaire version, Neck questionnaires, Oral cancer, Oral disorders, Oral function, Oral health impact community dent health, Oral maxillofac surg, Oral oncol, Oral rehabilitation, Oral rehabilitation clinic, Oral rehabilitation questionnaire, Oral rehabilitation questionnaire table, Oral rehabilitation team, Oropharyngeal cancer, Other people, Other questionnaires, Past week, Patient groups, Pilot study, Possible responses, Primary surgery, Pureed food eortc, Questions deal, Radiotherapy, Regional maxillofacial unit, Rehabilitation questionnaire, Small sample size, Social life, Solid food eortc, Tooth loss, University hospital aintree, Upper denture, Upper denture cause soreness, Uwqol, Washington head.
- Teeft :
- Adjuvant radiotherapy, Aintree trust, Arch otolaryngol head neck surg, Blackwell publishing, British association, Cancer groups, Cancer patients, Clinical function, Consecutive patients, Conventional dentures, Denture, Denture domain, Endosteal implants, Eortc, European organisation, Experience problems, Facial, Facial appearance, Family eortc, Food particles, Full implant insertion, Full range, Good agreement, Head neck, Hrqol, Internal consistency, Likert scale, Liquids eortc, Liverpool, Lorq, Lower denture, Lower denture cause soreness, Lower dentures, Median correlation, Mouth dryness, Neck cancer, Neck cancer patients, Neck questionnaire version, Neck questionnaires, Oral cancer, Oral disorders, Oral function, Oral health impact community dent health, Oral maxillofac surg, Oral oncol, Oral rehabilitation, Oral rehabilitation clinic, Oral rehabilitation questionnaire, Oral rehabilitation questionnaire table, Oral rehabilitation team, Oropharyngeal cancer, Other people, Other questionnaires, Past week, Patient groups, Pilot study, Possible responses, Primary surgery, Pureed food eortc, Questions deal, Radiotherapy, Regional maxillofacial unit, Rehabilitation questionnaire, Small sample size, Social life, Solid food eortc, Tooth loss, University hospital aintree, Upper denture, Upper denture cause soreness, Uwqol, Washington head.
Abstract
summary There are several validated health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires designed to record patient‐derived outcomes in head and neck cancer. None deals specifically with oral rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to pilot a new questionnaire, the Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire (LORQ). The questionnaire consists of 25 items about oral function and denture satisfaction. A four‐point Likert scale is used. Sixty‐one consecutive patients attending oral rehabilitation clinics completed the LORQ in combination with the University of Washington Head and Neck questionnaire version 3 (UW‐QOL) and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer H&N quality of life questionnaire (EORTC H&N 35). Forty‐two patients received questionnaires at baseline, whereas the rest were provided with the questionnaires at various stages of oral rehabilitation. For each item on the questionnaire, a full range of possible responses were given by patients. Kappa coefficients of agreement for test–retest data indicated moderate to very good agreement between repeat questionnaires. There were significant correlations (P < 0·001) between items in the LORQ and those in the UW‐QOL and EORTC HN questionnaires. The LORQ also identified differences in responses between non‐cancer and cancer groups of patients undergoing oral rehabilitation. This study of the LORQ is encouraging, although data on its responsiveness over time and to intervention is awaited.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01279.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:0CF79BA26C8FD962C30365915F4A00224F8552CBLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire: a pilot study</title><author><name sortKey="Pace Alzan, A" sort="Pace Alzan, A" uniqKey="Pace Alzan A" first="A." last="Pace-Balzan">A. Pace-Balzan</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Oral and Maxillofacial Department, Countess of Chester Hospital, Chester</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Cawood, J I" sort="Cawood, J I" uniqKey="Cawood J" first="J. I." last="Cawood">J. I. Cawood</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Oral and Maxillofacial Department, Countess of Chester Hospital, Chester</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Howell, R" sort="Howell, R" uniqKey="Howell R" first="R." last="Howell">R. Howell</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, Liverpool University Dental Hospital, Pembroke Place, Liverpool</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lowe, D" sort="Lowe, D" uniqKey="Lowe D" first="D." last="Lowe">D. Lowe</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Medical Statistician, Mossley, Cheshire</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Rogers, S N" sort="Rogers, S N" uniqKey="Rogers S" first="S. N." last="Rogers">S. N. Rogers</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Regional Maxillofacial Unit, University Hospital Aintree, Aintree Trust, Liverpool, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:0CF79BA26C8FD962C30365915F4A00224F8552CB</idno><date when="2004" year="2004">2004</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01279.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/0CF79BA26C8FD962C30365915F4A00224F8552CB/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000623</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000623</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire: a pilot study</title><author><name sortKey="Pace Alzan, A" sort="Pace Alzan, A" uniqKey="Pace Alzan A" first="A." last="Pace-Balzan">A. Pace-Balzan</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Oral and Maxillofacial Department, Countess of Chester Hospital, Chester</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Cawood, J I" sort="Cawood, J I" uniqKey="Cawood J" first="J. I." last="Cawood">J. I. Cawood</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Oral and Maxillofacial Department, Countess of Chester Hospital, Chester</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Howell, R" sort="Howell, R" uniqKey="Howell R" first="R." last="Howell">R. Howell</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, Liverpool University Dental Hospital, Pembroke Place, Liverpool</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lowe, D" sort="Lowe, D" uniqKey="Lowe D" first="D." last="Lowe">D. Lowe</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Medical Statistician, Mossley, Cheshire</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Rogers, S N" sort="Rogers, S N" uniqKey="Rogers S" first="S. N." last="Rogers">S. N. Rogers</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Regional Maxillofacial Unit, University Hospital Aintree, Aintree Trust, Liverpool, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">31</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="609">609</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="617">617</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2004-06">2004-06</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adjuvant radiotherapy</term><term>Aintree trust</term><term>Arch otolaryngol head neck surg</term><term>Blackwell publishing</term><term>British association</term><term>Cancer groups</term><term>Cancer patients</term><term>Clinical function</term><term>Consecutive patients</term><term>Conventional dentures</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture domain</term><term>Endosteal implants</term><term>Eortc</term><term>European organisation</term><term>Experience problems</term><term>Facial</term><term>Facial appearance</term><term>Family eortc</term><term>Food particles</term><term>Full implant insertion</term><term>Full range</term><term>Good agreement</term><term>Head neck</term><term>Hrqol</term><term>Internal consistency</term><term>Likert scale</term><term>Liquids eortc</term><term>Liverpool</term><term>Lorq</term><term>Lower denture</term><term>Lower denture cause soreness</term><term>Lower dentures</term><term>Median correlation</term><term>Mouth dryness</term><term>Neck cancer</term><term>Neck cancer patients</term><term>Neck questionnaire version</term><term>Neck questionnaires</term><term>Oral cancer</term><term>Oral disorders</term><term>Oral function</term><term>Oral health impact community dent health</term><term>Oral maxillofac surg</term><term>Oral oncol</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Oral rehabilitation clinic</term><term>Oral rehabilitation questionnaire</term><term>Oral rehabilitation questionnaire table</term><term>Oral rehabilitation team</term><term>Oropharyngeal cancer</term><term>Other people</term><term>Other questionnaires</term><term>Past week</term><term>Patient groups</term><term>Pilot study</term><term>Possible responses</term><term>Primary surgery</term><term>Pureed food eortc</term><term>Questions deal</term><term>Radiotherapy</term><term>Regional maxillofacial unit</term><term>Rehabilitation questionnaire</term><term>Small sample size</term><term>Social life</term><term>Solid food eortc</term><term>Tooth loss</term><term>University hospital aintree</term><term>Upper denture</term><term>Upper denture cause soreness</term><term>Uwqol</term><term>Washington head</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Adjuvant radiotherapy</term><term>Aintree trust</term><term>Arch otolaryngol head neck surg</term><term>Blackwell publishing</term><term>British association</term><term>Cancer groups</term><term>Cancer patients</term><term>Clinical function</term><term>Consecutive patients</term><term>Conventional dentures</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture domain</term><term>Endosteal implants</term><term>Eortc</term><term>European organisation</term><term>Experience problems</term><term>Facial</term><term>Facial appearance</term><term>Family eortc</term><term>Food particles</term><term>Full implant insertion</term><term>Full range</term><term>Good agreement</term><term>Head neck</term><term>Hrqol</term><term>Internal consistency</term><term>Likert scale</term><term>Liquids eortc</term><term>Liverpool</term><term>Lorq</term><term>Lower denture</term><term>Lower denture cause soreness</term><term>Lower dentures</term><term>Median correlation</term><term>Mouth dryness</term><term>Neck cancer</term><term>Neck cancer patients</term><term>Neck questionnaire version</term><term>Neck questionnaires</term><term>Oral cancer</term><term>Oral disorders</term><term>Oral function</term><term>Oral health impact community dent health</term><term>Oral maxillofac surg</term><term>Oral oncol</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Oral rehabilitation clinic</term><term>Oral rehabilitation questionnaire</term><term>Oral rehabilitation questionnaire table</term><term>Oral rehabilitation team</term><term>Oropharyngeal cancer</term><term>Other people</term><term>Other questionnaires</term><term>Past week</term><term>Patient groups</term><term>Pilot study</term><term>Possible responses</term><term>Primary surgery</term><term>Pureed food eortc</term><term>Questions deal</term><term>Radiotherapy</term><term>Regional maxillofacial unit</term><term>Rehabilitation questionnaire</term><term>Small sample size</term><term>Social life</term><term>Solid food eortc</term><term>Tooth loss</term><term>University hospital aintree</term><term>Upper denture</term><term>Upper denture cause soreness</term><term>Uwqol</term><term>Washington head</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">summary There are several validated health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires designed to record patient‐derived outcomes in head and neck cancer. None deals specifically with oral rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to pilot a new questionnaire, the Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire (LORQ). The questionnaire consists of 25 items about oral function and denture satisfaction. A four‐point Likert scale is used. Sixty‐one consecutive patients attending oral rehabilitation clinics completed the LORQ in combination with the University of Washington Head and Neck questionnaire version 3 (UW‐QOL) and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer H&N quality of life questionnaire (EORTC H&N 35). Forty‐two patients received questionnaires at baseline, whereas the rest were provided with the questionnaires at various stages of oral rehabilitation. For each item on the questionnaire, a full range of possible responses were given by patients. Kappa coefficients of agreement for test–retest data indicated moderate to very good agreement between repeat questionnaires. There were significant correlations (P < 0·001) between items in the LORQ and those in the UW‐QOL and EORTC HN questionnaires. The LORQ also identified differences in responses between non‐cancer and cancer groups of patients undergoing oral rehabilitation. This study of the LORQ is encouraging, although data on its responsiveness over time and to intervention is awaited.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>eortc</json:string><json:string>oral rehabilitation</json:string><json:string>food particles</json:string><json:string>lorq</json:string><json:string>hrqol</json:string><json:string>uwqol</json:string><json:string>blackwell publishing</json:string><json:string>radiotherapy</json:string><json:string>upper denture</json:string><json:string>oral function</json:string><json:string>cancer patients</json:string><json:string>lower denture</json:string><json:string>facial appearance</json:string><json:string>mouth dryness</json:string><json:string>oral cancer</json:string><json:string>experience problems</json:string><json:string>oral rehabilitation questionnaire</json:string><json:string>oral rehabilitation clinic</json:string><json:string>head neck</json:string><json:string>tooth loss</json:string><json:string>primary surgery</json:string><json:string>pilot study</json:string><json:string>neck cancer</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac surg</json:string><json:string>social life</json:string><json:string>oropharyngeal cancer</json:string><json:string>neck questionnaires</json:string><json:string>past week</json:string><json:string>neck cancer patients</json:string><json:string>adjuvant radiotherapy</json:string><json:string>lower dentures</json:string><json:string>rehabilitation questionnaire</json:string><json:string>family eortc</json:string><json:string>other people</json:string><json:string>consecutive patients</json:string><json:string>oral disorders</json:string><json:string>liverpool</json:string><json:string>full implant insertion</json:string><json:string>internal consistency</json:string><json:string>cancer groups</json:string><json:string>median correlation</json:string><json:string>good agreement</json:string><json:string>possible responses</json:string><json:string>full range</json:string><json:string>regional maxillofacial unit</json:string><json:string>university hospital aintree</json:string><json:string>european organisation</json:string><json:string>upper denture cause soreness</json:string><json:string>lower denture cause soreness</json:string><json:string>endosteal implants</json:string><json:string>conventional dentures</json:string><json:string>oral rehabilitation questionnaire table</json:string><json:string>british association</json:string><json:string>washington head</json:string><json:string>arch otolaryngol head neck surg</json:string><json:string>liquids eortc</json:string><json:string>pureed food eortc</json:string><json:string>solid food eortc</json:string><json:string>other questionnaires</json:string><json:string>patient groups</json:string><json:string>oral rehabilitation team</json:string><json:string>questions deal</json:string><json:string>denture domain</json:string><json:string>small sample size</json:string><json:string>likert scale</json:string><json:string>clinical function</json:string><json:string>aintree trust</json:string><json:string>oral oncol</json:string><json:string>oral health impact community dent health</json:string><json:string>neck questionnaire version</json:string><json:string>facial</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>A. Pace‐Balzan</name><affiliations><json:string>Oral and Maxillofacial Department, Countess of Chester Hospital, Chester</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>J. I. Cawood</name><affiliations><json:string>Oral and Maxillofacial Department, Countess of Chester Hospital, Chester</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>R. Howell</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Restorative Dentistry, Liverpool University Dental Hospital, Pembroke Place, Liverpool</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>D. Lowe</name><affiliations><json:string>Medical Statistician, Mossley, Cheshire</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>S. N. Rogers</name><affiliations><json:string>Regional Maxillofacial Unit, University Hospital Aintree, Aintree Trust, Liverpool, UK</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>oral rehabilitation</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>oral cancer</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>questionnaire</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>JOOR1279</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-35LP3DVX-X</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>summary There are several validated health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires designed to record patient‐derived outcomes in head and neck cancer. None deals specifically with oral rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to pilot a new questionnaire, the Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire (LORQ). The questionnaire consists of 25 items about oral function and denture satisfaction. A four‐point Likert scale is used. Sixty‐one consecutive patients attending oral rehabilitation clinics completed the LORQ in combination with the University of Washington Head and Neck questionnaire version 3 (UW‐QOL) and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer H&N quality of life questionnaire (EORTC H&N 35). Forty‐two patients received questionnaires at baseline, whereas the rest were provided with the questionnaires at various stages of oral rehabilitation. For each item on the questionnaire, a full range of possible responses were given by patients. Kappa coefficients of agreement for test–retest data indicated moderate to very good agreement between repeat questionnaires. There were significant correlations (P > 0·001) between items in the LORQ and those in the UW‐QOL and EORTC HN questionnaires. The LORQ also identified differences in responses between non‐cancer and cancer groups of patients undergoing oral rehabilitation. This study of the LORQ is encouraging, although data on its responsiveness over time and to intervention is awaited.</abstract><qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>210</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1487</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>3</keywordCount><score>8.864</score><pdfWordCount>4344</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>28915</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>9</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595 x 782 pts</pdfPageSize></qualityIndicators><title>The Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire: a pilot study</title><pmid><json:string>15189321</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0305-182X</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1365-2842</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JOOR</json:string></publisherId><volume>31</volume><issue>6</issue><pages><first>609</first><last>617</last><total>9</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>between November 1999 and January 2002</json:string><json:string>1999</json:string><json:string>2004</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>European Organisation for Research and Treatment</json:string><json:string>University Hospital Aintree, Aintree Trust, Liverpool, UK There</json:string><json:string>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</json:string><json:string>University of Washington Head</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName></persName><placeName><json:string>Cheshire</json:string><json:string>UK</json:string><json:string>Liverpool</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Allison et al.</json:string><json:string>Davis et al.</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-35LP3DVX-X</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2004</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2004</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01279.x</json:string></doi><id>0CF79BA26C8FD962C30365915F4A00224F8552CB</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0CF79BA26C8FD962C30365915F4A00224F8552CB/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0CF79BA26C8FD962C30365915F4A00224F8552CB/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/0CF79BA26C8FD962C30365915F4A00224F8552CB/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">The Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire: a pilot study</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2004-06"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire: a pilot study</title><title level="a" type="short">ORAL REHABILITATION QUESTIONNAIRE</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">A.</forename><surname>Pace‐Balzan</surname></persName><affiliation>Oral and Maxillofacial Department, Countess of Chester Hospital, Chester</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">J. I.</forename><surname>Cawood</surname></persName><affiliation>Oral and Maxillofacial Department, Countess of Chester Hospital, Chester</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">R.</forename><surname>Howell</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, Liverpool University Dental Hospital, Pembroke Place, Liverpool</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">D.</forename><surname>Lowe</surname></persName><affiliation>Medical Statistician, Mossley, Cheshire</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">S. N.</forename><surname>Rogers</surname></persName><affiliation>Regional Maxillofacial Unit, University Hospital Aintree, Aintree Trust, Liverpool, UK<address><country key="GB"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">0CF79BA26C8FD962C30365915F4A00224F8552CB</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-35LP3DVX-X</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01279.x</idno><idno type="unit">JOOR1279</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JOOR.JOOR1279.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title><idno type="pISSN">0305-182X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/jor.2004.31.issue-6</idno><idno type="product">JOOR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">31</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="609">609</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="617">617</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2004-06"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p><hi rend="bold"><hi rend="smallCaps">summary</hi>
</hi> There are several validated health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires designed to record patient‐derived outcomes in head and neck cancer. None deals specifically with oral rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to pilot a new questionnaire, the Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire (LORQ). The questionnaire consists of 25 items about oral function and denture satisfaction. A four‐point Likert scale is used. Sixty‐one consecutive patients attending oral rehabilitation clinics completed the LORQ in combination with the University of Washington Head and Neck questionnaire version 3 (UW‐QOL) and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer H&N quality of life questionnaire (EORTC H&N 35). Forty‐two patients received questionnaires at baseline, whereas the rest were provided with the questionnaires at various stages of oral rehabilitation. For each item on the questionnaire, a full range of possible responses were given by patients. Kappa coefficients of agreement for test–retest data indicated moderate to very good agreement between repeat questionnaires. There were significant correlations (<hi rend="italic">P</hi> < 0·001) between items in the LORQ and those in the UW‐QOL and EORTC HN questionnaires. The LORQ also identified differences in responses between non‐cancer and cancer groups of patients undergoing oral rehabilitation. This study of the LORQ is encouraging, although data on its responsiveness over time and to intervention is awaited.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">oral rehabilitation</term><term xml:id="k2">oral cancer</term><term xml:id="k3">questionnaire</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0CF79BA26C8FD962C30365915F4A00224F8552CB/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</doi><issn type="print">0305-182X</issn><issn type="electronic">1365-2842</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JOOR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="06006"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/jor.2004.31.issue-6</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="31">31</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="6">6</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2004-06">June 2004</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="16" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01279.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JOOR1279"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="9"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original articles</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2004-06-01"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2004-06-01"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.5 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-04-07"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-20"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-30"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="609">609</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="617">617</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Mr Simon N. Rogers FDS RCS FRCS MD, Consultant and Honorary Reader, Regional Maxillofacial Unit, University Hospital Aintree, Aintree Trust, Liverpool L9 1AL, UK.
E‐mail: <email>snrogers@doctors.org.uk</email></correspondenceTo><objectNameGroup><objectName elementName="appendix">Appendix</objectName></objectNameGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JOOR.JOOR1279.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted for publication 6 March 2003</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="4"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">The Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire: a pilot study</title><title type="shortAuthors">A. PACE‐BALZAN <i>et al</i>.</title><title type="short">ORAL REHABILITATION QUESTIONNAIRE</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>A.</givenNames><familyName>Pace‐Balzan</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>J. I.</givenNames><familyName>Cawood</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>R.</givenNames><familyName>Howell</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>D.</givenNames><familyName>Lowe</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a4"><personName><givenNames>S. N.</givenNames><familyName>Rogers</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation>Oral and Maxillofacial Department, Countess of Chester Hospital, Chester</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, Liverpool University Dental Hospital, Pembroke Place, Liverpool</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3"><unparsedAffiliation>Medical Statistician, Mossley, Cheshire</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a4" countryCode="GB"><unparsedAffiliation>Regional Maxillofacial Unit, University Hospital Aintree, Aintree Trust, Liverpool, UK</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">oral rehabilitation</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">oral cancer</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">questionnaire</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><b><sc>summary</sc> </b> There are several validated health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires designed to record patient‐derived outcomes in head and neck cancer. None deals specifically with oral rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to pilot a new questionnaire, the Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire (LORQ). The questionnaire consists of 25 items about oral function and denture satisfaction. A four‐point Likert scale is used. Sixty‐one consecutive patients attending oral rehabilitation clinics completed the LORQ in combination with the University of Washington Head and Neck questionnaire version 3 (UW‐QOL) and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer H&N quality of life questionnaire (EORTC H&N 35). Forty‐two patients received questionnaires at baseline, whereas the rest were provided with the questionnaires at various stages of oral rehabilitation. For each item on the questionnaire, a full range of possible responses were given by patients. Kappa coefficients of agreement for test–retest data indicated moderate to very good agreement between repeat questionnaires. There were significant correlations (<i>P</i> < 0·001) between items in the LORQ and those in the UW‐QOL and EORTC HN questionnaires. The LORQ also identified differences in responses between non‐cancer and cancer groups of patients undergoing oral rehabilitation. This study of the LORQ is encouraging, although data on its responsiveness over time and to intervention is awaited.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>The Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire: a pilot study</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>ORAL REHABILITATION QUESTIONNAIRE</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>The Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire: a pilot study</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">A.</namePart><namePart type="family">Pace‐Balzan</namePart><affiliation>Oral and Maxillofacial Department, Countess of Chester Hospital, Chester</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">J. I.</namePart><namePart type="family">Cawood</namePart><affiliation>Oral and Maxillofacial Department, Countess of Chester Hospital, Chester</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">R.</namePart><namePart type="family">Howell</namePart><affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, Liverpool University Dental Hospital, Pembroke Place, Liverpool</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">D.</namePart><namePart type="family">Lowe</namePart><affiliation>Medical Statistician, Mossley, Cheshire</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">S. N.</namePart><namePart type="family">Rogers</namePart><affiliation>Regional Maxillofacial Unit, University Hospital Aintree, Aintree Trust, Liverpool, UK</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2004-06</dateIssued><edition>Accepted for publication 6 March 2003</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2004</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">0</extent><extent unit="tables">4</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>summary There are several validated health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires designed to record patient‐derived outcomes in head and neck cancer. None deals specifically with oral rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to pilot a new questionnaire, the Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire (LORQ). The questionnaire consists of 25 items about oral function and denture satisfaction. A four‐point Likert scale is used. Sixty‐one consecutive patients attending oral rehabilitation clinics completed the LORQ in combination with the University of Washington Head and Neck questionnaire version 3 (UW‐QOL) and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer H&N quality of life questionnaire (EORTC H&N 35). Forty‐two patients received questionnaires at baseline, whereas the rest were provided with the questionnaires at various stages of oral rehabilitation. For each item on the questionnaire, a full range of possible responses were given by patients. Kappa coefficients of agreement for test–retest data indicated moderate to very good agreement between repeat questionnaires. There were significant correlations (P < 0·001) between items in the LORQ and those in the UW‐QOL and EORTC HN questionnaires. The LORQ also identified differences in responses between non‐cancer and cancer groups of patients undergoing oral rehabilitation. This study of the LORQ is encouraging, although data on its responsiveness over time and to intervention is awaited.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>oral rehabilitation</topic><topic>oral cancer</topic><topic>questionnaire</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0305-182X</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1365-2842</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JOOR</identifier><part><date>2004</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>31</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>6</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>609</start><end>617</end><total>9</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">0CF79BA26C8FD962C30365915F4A00224F8552CB</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-35LP3DVX-X</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01279.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JOOR1279</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Science Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0CF79BA26C8FD962C30365915F4A00224F8552CB/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000623 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000623 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:0CF79BA26C8FD962C30365915F4A00224F8552CB
|texte= The Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire: a pilot study
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |