Willingness‐to‐pay to avoid the time spent and discomfort associated with screening colonoscopy
Identifieur interne : 000621 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000620; suivant : 000622Willingness‐to‐pay to avoid the time spent and discomfort associated with screening colonoscopy
Auteurs : Daniel E. Jonas ; Louise B. Russell ; Jon Chou ; Michael PignoneSource :
- Health Economics [ 1057-9230 ] ; 2010-10.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Appropriate value, Average wage, Borisova, Chapel hill, Colon cancer, Colon cancer screening, Colonoscopy, Colonoscopy experience, Colonoscopy preparation, Colonoscopy process, Colonoscopy screening process, Colonoscopy study, Colorectal cancer, Colorectal cancer screening, Contingent valuation, Contingent valuation method, Contingent valuation study, Copyright, Discomfort, Drug abuse treatment, Econ, Employment status, Endoscopy center, Episodic series, European journal, Frew, Graduate degree, Gueylard chenevier, Health care, Health econ, Health economics, Health policy, Household chores, Human capital method, Human capital method values, Human capital methods, Human capital value, Human capital values, Independent variables, Intermittent periods, International journal, Irregular series, John wiley sons, Jonas, Leisure activities, Linear regression analysis, Many hours, Maximum amount, Median, Medical care, Medical decision, Medical screening, Methadone maintenance clients, National wage averages, Opportunity cost, Other activities, Other destination, Patient characteristics, Patient time, Patient time requirements, Personal income, Prep, Preparation medication, Previous studies, Recovery period, Routine time, Screening, Screening colonoscopy, Screening colonoscopy process, Substance abuse treatment, Technology assessment, Time costs, Time diaries, Time diary, Time intervals, Time measures, Time patients, Time requirements, Total time, Travel cost, Travel time, Treatment attendance, Value time, Various time intervals, Wage rate, Wage rates, Whynes, Work days.
- Teeft :
- Appropriate value, Average wage, Borisova, Chapel hill, Colon cancer, Colon cancer screening, Colonoscopy, Colonoscopy experience, Colonoscopy preparation, Colonoscopy process, Colonoscopy screening process, Colonoscopy study, Colorectal cancer, Colorectal cancer screening, Contingent valuation, Contingent valuation method, Contingent valuation study, Copyright, Discomfort, Drug abuse treatment, Econ, Employment status, Endoscopy center, Episodic series, European journal, Frew, Graduate degree, Gueylard chenevier, Health care, Health econ, Health economics, Health policy, Household chores, Human capital method, Human capital method values, Human capital methods, Human capital value, Human capital values, Independent variables, Intermittent periods, International journal, Irregular series, John wiley sons, Jonas, Leisure activities, Linear regression analysis, Many hours, Maximum amount, Median, Medical care, Medical decision, Medical screening, Methadone maintenance clients, National wage averages, Opportunity cost, Other activities, Other destination, Patient characteristics, Patient time, Patient time requirements, Personal income, Prep, Preparation medication, Previous studies, Recovery period, Routine time, Screening, Screening colonoscopy, Screening colonoscopy process, Substance abuse treatment, Technology assessment, Time costs, Time diaries, Time diary, Time intervals, Time measures, Time patients, Time requirements, Total time, Travel cost, Travel time, Treatment attendance, Value time, Various time intervals, Wage rate, Wage rates, Whynes, Work days.
Abstract
Background: The screening colonoscopy process requires a considerable amount of time and some discomfort for patients. Objective: We sought to use willingness‐to‐pay (WTP) to value the time required and the discomfort associated with screening colonoscopy. In addition, we aimed to explore some of the differences between and potential uses of the WTP and the human capital methods. Methods: Subjects completed a diary recording time and a questionnaire including WTP questions to value the time and discomfort associated with colonoscopy. We also valued the elapsed time reported in the diaries (but not the discomfort) using the human capital method. Results: 110 subjects completed the study. Mean WTP to avoid the time and discomfort was $263. Human capital values for elapsed time were greater. Linear regressions showed that WTP was influenced most by the difficulty of the preparation, which added $147 to WTP (p=0.03). Conclusions: WTP values to avoid the time and discomfort associated with the screening colonoscopy process were substantially lower than most of the human capital values for elapsed time alone. The human capital method may overestimate the value of time in situations that involve an irregular, episodic series of time intervals, such as preparation for or recovery after colonoscopy. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Url:
DOI: 10.1002/hec.1545
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:0CEF57FE7C9A753F5F2871149EFCA8266740480CLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Willingness‐to‐pay to avoid the time spent and discomfort associated with screening colonoscopy</title><author><name sortKey="Jonas, Daniel E" sort="Jonas, Daniel E" uniqKey="Jonas D" first="Daniel E." last="Jonas">Daniel E. Jonas</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: daniel_jonas@med.unc.edu</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence address: UNC Department of Medicine, CB ♯7110, 5039 Old Clinic Building, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA===</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Russell, Louise B" sort="Russell, Louise B" uniqKey="Russell L" first="Louise B." last="Russell">Louise B. Russell</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Economics, Rutgers University, Institute for Health, New Brunswick, NJ, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Chou, Jon" sort="Chou, Jon" uniqKey="Chou J" first="Jon" last="Chou">Jon Chou</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pignone, Michael" sort="Pignone, Michael" uniqKey="Pignone M" first="Michael" last="Pignone">Michael Pignone</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:0CEF57FE7C9A753F5F2871149EFCA8266740480C</idno><date when="2010" year="2010">2010</date><idno type="doi">10.1002/hec.1545</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/0CEF57FE7C9A753F5F2871149EFCA8266740480C/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000621</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000621</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Willingness‐to‐pay to avoid the time spent and discomfort associated with screening colonoscopy</title><author><name sortKey="Jonas, Daniel E" sort="Jonas, Daniel E" uniqKey="Jonas D" first="Daniel E." last="Jonas">Daniel E. Jonas</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: daniel_jonas@med.unc.edu</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence address: UNC Department of Medicine, CB ♯7110, 5039 Old Clinic Building, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA===</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Russell, Louise B" sort="Russell, Louise B" uniqKey="Russell L" first="Louise B." last="Russell">Louise B. Russell</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Economics, Rutgers University, Institute for Health, New Brunswick, NJ, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Chou, Jon" sort="Chou, Jon" uniqKey="Chou J" first="Jon" last="Chou">Jon Chou</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pignone, Michael" sort="Pignone, Michael" uniqKey="Pignone M" first="Michael" last="Pignone">Michael Pignone</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Health Economics</title><title level="j" type="alt">HEALTH ECONOMICS</title><idno type="ISSN">1057-9230</idno><idno type="eISSN">1099-1050</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">19</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">10</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1193">1193</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1211">1211</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">19</biblScope><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-10">2010-10</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1057-9230</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1057-9230</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Appropriate value</term><term>Average wage</term><term>Borisova</term><term>Chapel hill</term><term>Colon cancer</term><term>Colon cancer screening</term><term>Colonoscopy</term><term>Colonoscopy experience</term><term>Colonoscopy preparation</term><term>Colonoscopy process</term><term>Colonoscopy screening process</term><term>Colonoscopy study</term><term>Colorectal cancer</term><term>Colorectal cancer screening</term><term>Contingent valuation</term><term>Contingent valuation method</term><term>Contingent valuation study</term><term>Copyright</term><term>Discomfort</term><term>Drug abuse treatment</term><term>Econ</term><term>Employment status</term><term>Endoscopy center</term><term>Episodic series</term><term>European journal</term><term>Frew</term><term>Graduate degree</term><term>Gueylard chenevier</term><term>Health care</term><term>Health econ</term><term>Health economics</term><term>Health policy</term><term>Household chores</term><term>Human capital method</term><term>Human capital method values</term><term>Human capital methods</term><term>Human capital value</term><term>Human capital values</term><term>Independent variables</term><term>Intermittent periods</term><term>International journal</term><term>Irregular series</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Jonas</term><term>Leisure activities</term><term>Linear regression analysis</term><term>Many hours</term><term>Maximum amount</term><term>Median</term><term>Medical care</term><term>Medical decision</term><term>Medical screening</term><term>Methadone maintenance clients</term><term>National wage averages</term><term>Opportunity cost</term><term>Other activities</term><term>Other destination</term><term>Patient characteristics</term><term>Patient time</term><term>Patient time requirements</term><term>Personal income</term><term>Prep</term><term>Preparation medication</term><term>Previous studies</term><term>Recovery period</term><term>Routine time</term><term>Screening</term><term>Screening colonoscopy</term><term>Screening colonoscopy process</term><term>Substance abuse treatment</term><term>Technology assessment</term><term>Time costs</term><term>Time diaries</term><term>Time diary</term><term>Time intervals</term><term>Time measures</term><term>Time patients</term><term>Time requirements</term><term>Total time</term><term>Travel cost</term><term>Travel time</term><term>Treatment attendance</term><term>Value time</term><term>Various time intervals</term><term>Wage rate</term><term>Wage rates</term><term>Whynes</term><term>Work days</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Appropriate value</term><term>Average wage</term><term>Borisova</term><term>Chapel hill</term><term>Colon cancer</term><term>Colon cancer screening</term><term>Colonoscopy</term><term>Colonoscopy experience</term><term>Colonoscopy preparation</term><term>Colonoscopy process</term><term>Colonoscopy screening process</term><term>Colonoscopy study</term><term>Colorectal cancer</term><term>Colorectal cancer screening</term><term>Contingent valuation</term><term>Contingent valuation method</term><term>Contingent valuation study</term><term>Copyright</term><term>Discomfort</term><term>Drug abuse treatment</term><term>Econ</term><term>Employment status</term><term>Endoscopy center</term><term>Episodic series</term><term>European journal</term><term>Frew</term><term>Graduate degree</term><term>Gueylard chenevier</term><term>Health care</term><term>Health econ</term><term>Health economics</term><term>Health policy</term><term>Household chores</term><term>Human capital method</term><term>Human capital method values</term><term>Human capital methods</term><term>Human capital value</term><term>Human capital values</term><term>Independent variables</term><term>Intermittent periods</term><term>International journal</term><term>Irregular series</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Jonas</term><term>Leisure activities</term><term>Linear regression analysis</term><term>Many hours</term><term>Maximum amount</term><term>Median</term><term>Medical care</term><term>Medical decision</term><term>Medical screening</term><term>Methadone maintenance clients</term><term>National wage averages</term><term>Opportunity cost</term><term>Other activities</term><term>Other destination</term><term>Patient characteristics</term><term>Patient time</term><term>Patient time requirements</term><term>Personal income</term><term>Prep</term><term>Preparation medication</term><term>Previous studies</term><term>Recovery period</term><term>Routine time</term><term>Screening</term><term>Screening colonoscopy</term><term>Screening colonoscopy process</term><term>Substance abuse treatment</term><term>Technology assessment</term><term>Time costs</term><term>Time diaries</term><term>Time diary</term><term>Time intervals</term><term>Time measures</term><term>Time patients</term><term>Time requirements</term><term>Total time</term><term>Travel cost</term><term>Travel time</term><term>Treatment attendance</term><term>Value time</term><term>Various time intervals</term><term>Wage rate</term><term>Wage rates</term><term>Whynes</term><term>Work days</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Background: The screening colonoscopy process requires a considerable amount of time and some discomfort for patients. Objective: We sought to use willingness‐to‐pay (WTP) to value the time required and the discomfort associated with screening colonoscopy. In addition, we aimed to explore some of the differences between and potential uses of the WTP and the human capital methods. Methods: Subjects completed a diary recording time and a questionnaire including WTP questions to value the time and discomfort associated with colonoscopy. We also valued the elapsed time reported in the diaries (but not the discomfort) using the human capital method. Results: 110 subjects completed the study. Mean WTP to avoid the time and discomfort was $263. Human capital values for elapsed time were greater. Linear regressions showed that WTP was influenced most by the difficulty of the preparation, which added $147 to WTP (p=0.03). Conclusions: WTP values to avoid the time and discomfort associated with the screening colonoscopy process were substantially lower than most of the human capital values for elapsed time alone. The human capital method may overestimate the value of time in situations that involve an irregular, episodic series of time intervals, such as preparation for or recovery after colonoscopy. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>colonoscopy</json:string><json:string>human capital method</json:string><json:string>jonas</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons</json:string><json:string>copyright</json:string><json:string>econ</json:string><json:string>health econ</json:string><json:string>patient time</json:string><json:string>routine time</json:string><json:string>colonoscopy process</json:string><json:string>frew</json:string><json:string>whynes</json:string><json:string>borisova</json:string><json:string>screening colonoscopy</json:string><json:string>screening colonoscopy process</json:string><json:string>patient characteristics</json:string><json:string>human capital values</json:string><json:string>health economics</json:string><json:string>intermittent periods</json:string><json:string>colon cancer</json:string><json:string>wage rate</json:string><json:string>value time</json:string><json:string>total time</json:string><json:string>medical decision</json:string><json:string>wage rates</json:string><json:string>median</json:string><json:string>screening</json:string><json:string>time costs</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>health policy</json:string><json:string>various time intervals</json:string><json:string>irregular series</json:string><json:string>national wage averages</json:string><json:string>technology assessment</json:string><json:string>household chores</json:string><json:string>leisure activities</json:string><json:string>travel time</json:string><json:string>colonoscopy screening process</json:string><json:string>methadone maintenance clients</json:string><json:string>medical care</json:string><json:string>human capital methods</json:string><json:string>colonoscopy study</json:string><json:string>endoscopy center</json:string><json:string>contingent valuation method</json:string><json:string>european journal</json:string><json:string>health care</json:string><json:string>time intervals</json:string><json:string>prep</json:string><json:string>time diary</json:string><json:string>colonoscopy preparation</json:string><json:string>human capital method values</json:string><json:string>chapel hill</json:string><json:string>colonoscopy experience</json:string><json:string>employment status</json:string><json:string>work days</json:string><json:string>travel cost</json:string><json:string>gueylard chenevier</json:string><json:string>linear regression analysis</json:string><json:string>independent variables</json:string><json:string>colorectal cancer</json:string><json:string>graduate degree</json:string><json:string>time measures</json:string><json:string>human capital value</json:string><json:string>colon cancer screening</json:string><json:string>drug abuse treatment</json:string><json:string>other activities</json:string><json:string>previous studies</json:string><json:string>time patients</json:string><json:string>opportunity cost</json:string><json:string>preparation medication</json:string><json:string>treatment attendance</json:string><json:string>other destination</json:string><json:string>contingent valuation</json:string><json:string>patient time requirements</json:string><json:string>maximum amount</json:string><json:string>time requirements</json:string><json:string>many hours</json:string><json:string>episodic series</json:string><json:string>recovery period</json:string><json:string>time diaries</json:string><json:string>substance abuse treatment</json:string><json:string>medical screening</json:string><json:string>personal income</json:string><json:string>colorectal cancer screening</json:string><json:string>contingent valuation study</json:string><json:string>average wage</json:string><json:string>appropriate value</json:string><json:string>discomfort</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Daniel E. Jonas</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA</json:string><json:string>E-mail: daniel_jonas@med.unc.edu</json:string><json:string>Correspondence address: UNC Department of Medicine, CB ♯7110, 5039 Old Clinic Building, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA===</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Louise B. Russell</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Economics, Rutgers University, Institute for Health, New Brunswick, NJ, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Jon Chou</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Michael Pignone</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>willingness‐to‐pay</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>contingent valuation method</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>health economics methods</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>colorectal cancer</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>HEC1545</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-BQW55NP6-Z</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Background: The screening colonoscopy process requires a considerable amount of time and some discomfort for patients. Objective: We sought to use willingness‐to‐pay (WTP) to value the time required and the discomfort associated with screening colonoscopy. In addition, we aimed to explore some of the differences between and potential uses of the WTP and the human capital methods. Methods: Subjects completed a diary recording time and a questionnaire including WTP questions to value the time and discomfort associated with colonoscopy. We also valued the elapsed time reported in the diaries (but not the discomfort) using the human capital method. Results: 110 subjects completed the study. Mean WTP to avoid the time and discomfort was $263. Human capital values for elapsed time were greater. Linear regressions showed that WTP was influenced most by the difficulty of the preparation, which added $147 to WTP (p=0.03). Conclusions: WTP values to avoid the time and discomfort associated with the screening colonoscopy process were substantially lower than most of the human capital values for elapsed time alone. The human capital method may overestimate the value of time in situations that involve an irregular, episodic series of time intervals, such as preparation for or recovery after colonoscopy. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>9.496</score><pdfWordCount>7077</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>43827</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>19</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>566.929 x 737.008 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>208</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1352</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>4</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Willingness‐to‐pay to avoid the time spent and discomfort associated with screening colonoscopy</title><pmid><json:string>19725018</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Health Economics</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1050</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1057-9230</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1099-1050</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>HEC</json:string></publisherId><volume>19</volume><issue>10</issue><pages><first>1193</first><last>1211</last><total>19</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Research Article</value></json:item></subject></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2005</json:string><json:string>between October 2005 and June 2006</json:string><json:string>2010</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center</json:string><json:string>University of North Carolina</json:string><json:string>African American Hispanic Asian/Paci</json:string><json:string>University of North Carolina Chapel Hill</json:string><json:string>Human Research Ethics Biomedical IRB</json:string><json:string>Sons, Ltd.</json:string><json:string>Sons, Ltd</json:string><json:string>Bureau of Labor Statistics</json:string><json:string>UNC Center for Health Promotion Economics</json:string><json:string>UNC Department of Medicine, CB</json:string><json:string>National Research Service Award Fellowship</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>Jonas</json:string><json:string>Spouse</json:string><json:string>Prevention</json:string></persName><placeName></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Robbins et al., 2002</json:string><json:string>Tang et al., 2007</json:string><json:string>Jonas et al., 2007, 2008</json:string><json:string>Attard et al., 2005</json:string><json:string>Bryan et al., 1995</json:string><json:string>Tilford, 1993</json:string><json:string>Zarkin et al., 2000</json:string><json:string>Slothuus et al., 2000</json:string><json:string>Sadri et al., 2005</json:string><json:string>Bergmo and Wangberg, 2007</json:string><json:string>Shireman et al., 2001</json:string><json:string>Gold et al., 1996</json:string><json:string>Russell et al., 1996</json:string><json:string>Sculpher et al., 2000</json:string><json:string>Johannesson et al., 1991, 1993, 1997</json:string><json:string>He et al., 2007</json:string><json:string>Greenberg et al., 2004</json:string><json:string>Unutzer et al., 2003</json:string><json:string>Safford et al., 2005</json:string><json:string>Whynes et al., 2003</json:string><json:string>Chenevier and LeLorier, 2005</json:string><json:string>Cantor et al., 2006</json:string><json:string>Oscarson et al., 2007</json:string><json:string>Secker-Walker et al., 1999</json:string><json:string>Pinto-Prades et al., 2008</json:string><json:string>Cromwell et al., 1997</json:string><json:string>Borisova and Goodman, 2003, 2004</json:string><json:string>Jonas et al., 2008</json:string><json:string>Yabroff et al., 2005</json:string><json:string>Salome et al., 2003</json:string><json:string>Boonen et al., 2005</json:string><json:string>Wagner et al., 2000</json:string><json:string>Bech and Gyrd-Hansen, 2000</json:string><json:string>Frew et al., 2001, 2003</json:string><json:string>Narbro and Sjostrom, 2000</json:string><json:string>Byrne et al., 2005</json:string><json:string>Jonas et al., 2007</json:string><json:string>Yasunaga et al., 2006a,b,c, 2007</json:string><json:string>Cauley, 1987</json:string><json:string>Fautrel et al., 2007</json:string><json:string>Frew et al., 1999</json:string><json:string>Phelps, 2003</json:string><json:string>Whynes et al.</json:string><json:string>Frew et al., 2001</json:string><json:string>Lawrence et al., 2001</json:string><json:string>Jimoh et al., 2007</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-BQW55NP6-Z</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - social science</json:string><json:string>2 - health policy & services</json:string><json:string>2 - economics</json:string><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - health care sciences & services</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - public health & health services</json:string><json:string>3 - health policy & services</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - Health Policy</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>2010</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2010</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1002/hec.1545</json:string></doi><id>0CEF57FE7C9A753F5F2871149EFCA8266740480C</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0CEF57FE7C9A753F5F2871149EFCA8266740480C/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0CEF57FE7C9A753F5F2871149EFCA8266740480C/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/0CEF57FE7C9A753F5F2871149EFCA8266740480C/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Willingness‐to‐pay to avoid the time spent and discomfort associated with screening colonoscopy</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2010-10"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Willingness‐to‐pay to avoid the time spent and discomfort associated with screening colonoscopy</title><title level="a" type="short" xml:lang="en">USING WILLINGNESS‐TO‐PAY</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Daniel E.</forename><surname>Jonas</surname></persName><email>daniel_jonas@med.unc.edu</email><affiliation>Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA<address><country key="US"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>UNC Department of Medicine, CB ♯7110, 5039 Old Clinic Building, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA===</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Louise B.</forename><surname>Russell</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Economics, Rutgers University, Institute for Health, New Brunswick, NJ, USA<address><country key="US"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Jon</forename><surname>Chou</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA<address><country key="US"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Michael</forename><surname>Pignone</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA<address><country key="US"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">0CEF57FE7C9A753F5F2871149EFCA8266740480C</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-BQW55NP6-Z</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/hec.1545</idno><idno type="unit">HEC1545</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:HEC.HEC1545.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Health Economics</title><title level="j" type="alt">HEALTH ECONOMICS</title><idno type="pISSN">1057-9230</idno><idno type="eISSN">1099-1050</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1050</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1002/hec.v19:10</idno><idno type="product">HEC</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">19</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">10</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1193">1193</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1211">1211</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">19</biblScope><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-10"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>Abstract</head><p><hi rend="italic">Background</hi>: The screening colonoscopy process requires a considerable amount of time and some discomfort for patients.</p><p><hi rend="italic">Objective</hi>: We sought to use willingness‐to‐pay (WTP) to value the time required and the discomfort associated with screening colonoscopy. In addition, we aimed to explore some of the differences between and potential uses of the WTP and the human capital methods.</p><p><hi rend="italic">Methods</hi>: Subjects completed a diary recording time and a questionnaire including WTP questions to value the time and discomfort associated with colonoscopy. We also valued the elapsed time reported in the diaries (but not the discomfort) using the human capital method.</p><p><hi rend="italic">Results</hi>: 110 subjects completed the study. Mean WTP to avoid the time and discomfort was $263. Human capital values for elapsed time were greater. Linear regressions showed that WTP was influenced most by the difficulty of the preparation, which added $147 to WTP (<hi rend="italic">p</hi>=0.03).</p><p><hi rend="italic">Conclusions</hi>: WTP values to avoid the time and discomfort associated with the screening colonoscopy process were substantially lower than most of the human capital values for elapsed time alone. The human capital method may overestimate the value of time in situations that involve an irregular, episodic series of time intervals, such as preparation for or recovery after colonoscopy. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="kwd1">willingness‐to‐pay</term><term xml:id="kwd2">contingent valuation method</term><term xml:id="kwd3">health economics methods</term><term xml:id="kwd4">colorectal cancer</term></keywords><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>Research Article</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Research Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0CEF57FE7C9A753F5F2871149EFCA8266740480C/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisherName><publisherLoc>Chichester, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi registered="yes">10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1050</doi><issn type="print">1057-9230</issn><issn type="electronic">1099-1050</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="HEC"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" xml:lang="en" sort="HEALTH ECONOMICS">Health Economics</title><title type="short">Health Econ.</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="100"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1002/hec.v19:10</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="19">19</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">10</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2010-10">October 2010</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="100" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1002/hec.1545</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="HEC1545"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="19"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Research Article</title><title type="tocHeading1">Research Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="manuscriptReceived" date="2008-09-30"></event><event type="manuscriptRevised" date="2009-06-09"></event><event type="manuscriptAccepted" date="2009-07-13"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2009-09-01"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2009-09-01"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:JWSART34_TO_WML3G version:2.3.18 mode:FullText" date="2010-09-09"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2010-09-09"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-24"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">1193</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">1211</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>UNC Department of Medicine, CB ♯7110, 5039 Old Clinic Building, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA===</correspondenceTo><objectNameGroup><objectName elementName="appendix">Appendix</objectName></objectNameGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:HEC.HEC1545.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="1"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="4"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="52"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" xml:lang="en">Willingness‐to‐pay to avoid the time spent and discomfort associated with screening colonoscopy</title><title type="short" xml:lang="en">USING WILLINGNESS‐TO‐PAY</title></titleGroup><creators><creator xml:id="au1" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Daniel E.</givenNames><familyName>Jonas</familyName></personName><contactDetails><email>daniel_jonas@med.unc.edu</email></contactDetails></creator><creator xml:id="au2" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af2"><personName><givenNames>Louise B.</givenNames><familyName>Russell</familyName></personName></creator><creator xml:id="au3" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af1"><personName><givenNames>Jon</givenNames><familyName>Chou</familyName></personName></creator><creator xml:id="au4" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af1"><personName><givenNames>Michael</givenNames><familyName>Pignone</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="af1" countryCode="US" type="organization"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="af2" countryCode="US" type="organization"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Economics, Rutgers University, Institute for Health, New Brunswick, NJ, USA</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en" type="author"><keyword xml:id="kwd1">willingness‐to‐pay</keyword><keyword xml:id="kwd2">contingent valuation method</keyword><keyword xml:id="kwd3">health economics methods</keyword><keyword xml:id="kwd4">colorectal cancer</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p><i>Background</i>: The screening colonoscopy process requires a considerable amount of time and some discomfort for patients.</p><p><i>Objective</i>: We sought to use willingness‐to‐pay (WTP) to value the time required and the discomfort associated with screening colonoscopy. In addition, we aimed to explore some of the differences between and potential uses of the WTP and the human capital methods.</p><p><i>Methods</i>: Subjects completed a diary recording time and a questionnaire including WTP questions to value the time and discomfort associated with colonoscopy. We also valued the elapsed time reported in the diaries (but not the discomfort) using the human capital method.</p><p><i>Results</i>: 110 subjects completed the study. Mean WTP to avoid the time and discomfort was $263. Human capital values for elapsed time were greater. Linear regressions showed that WTP was influenced most by the difficulty of the preparation, which added $147 to WTP (<i>p</i>=0.03).</p><p><i>Conclusions</i>: WTP values to avoid the time and discomfort associated with the screening colonoscopy process were substantially lower than most of the human capital values for elapsed time alone. The human capital method may overestimate the value of time in situations that involve an irregular, episodic series of time intervals, such as preparation for or recovery after colonoscopy. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Willingness‐to‐pay to avoid the time spent and discomfort associated with screening colonoscopy</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>USING WILLINGNESS‐TO‐PAY</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Willingness‐to‐pay to avoid the time spent and discomfort associated with screening colonoscopy</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Daniel E.</namePart><namePart type="family">Jonas</namePart><affiliation>Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: daniel_jonas@med.unc.edu</affiliation><affiliation>Correspondence address: UNC Department of Medicine, CB ♯7110, 5039 Old Clinic Building, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA===</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Louise B.</namePart><namePart type="family">Russell</namePart><affiliation>Department of Economics, Rutgers University, Institute for Health, New Brunswick, NJ, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Jon</namePart><namePart type="family">Chou</namePart><affiliation>Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Michael</namePart><namePart type="family">Pignone</namePart><affiliation>Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Chichester, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2010-10</dateIssued><dateCaptured encoding="w3cdtf">2008-09-30</dateCaptured><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2009-07-13</dateValid><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">1</extent><extent unit="tables">4</extent><extent unit="references">52</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Background: The screening colonoscopy process requires a considerable amount of time and some discomfort for patients. Objective: We sought to use willingness‐to‐pay (WTP) to value the time required and the discomfort associated with screening colonoscopy. In addition, we aimed to explore some of the differences between and potential uses of the WTP and the human capital methods. Methods: Subjects completed a diary recording time and a questionnaire including WTP questions to value the time and discomfort associated with colonoscopy. We also valued the elapsed time reported in the diaries (but not the discomfort) using the human capital method. Results: 110 subjects completed the study. Mean WTP to avoid the time and discomfort was $263. Human capital values for elapsed time were greater. Linear regressions showed that WTP was influenced most by the difficulty of the preparation, which added $147 to WTP (p=0.03). Conclusions: WTP values to avoid the time and discomfort associated with the screening colonoscopy process were substantially lower than most of the human capital values for elapsed time alone. The human capital method may overestimate the value of time in situations that involve an irregular, episodic series of time intervals, such as preparation for or recovery after colonoscopy. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>willingness‐to‐pay</topic><topic>contingent valuation method</topic><topic>health economics methods</topic><topic>colorectal cancer</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Health Economics</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Health Econ.</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Research Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">1057-9230</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1099-1050</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1050</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">HEC</identifier><part><date>2010</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>19</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>10</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>1193</start><end>1211</end><total>19</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">0CEF57FE7C9A753F5F2871149EFCA8266740480C</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-BQW55NP6-Z</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/hec.1545</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">HEC1545</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0CEF57FE7C9A753F5F2871149EFCA8266740480C/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000621 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000621 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:0CEF57FE7C9A753F5F2871149EFCA8266740480C
|texte= Willingness‐to‐pay to avoid the time spent and discomfort associated with screening colonoscopy
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |