Double Full-Arch Versus Single Full-Arch, Four Implant-Supported Rehabilitations: A Retrospective, 5-Year Cohort Study.
Identifieur interne : 000C79 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000C78; suivant : 000C80Double Full-Arch Versus Single Full-Arch, Four Implant-Supported Rehabilitations: A Retrospective, 5-Year Cohort Study.
Auteurs : Paulo Mal ; Miguel De Araújo Nobre ; Armando Lopes ; Rolando RodriguesSource :
- Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists [ 1532-849X ] ; 2015.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
Abstract
To report the 5-year outcome of the All-on-4 treatment concept comparing double full-arch (G1) and single-arch (G2) groups.
DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12228
PubMed: 25273895
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:25273895Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Double Full-Arch Versus Single Full-Arch, Four Implant-Supported Rehabilitations: A Retrospective, 5-Year Cohort Study.</title><author><name sortKey="Mal, Paulo" sort="Mal, Paulo" uniqKey="Mal P" first="Paulo" last="Mal">Paulo Mal</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Oral Surgery Department, Malo Clinic, Lisbon, Portugal.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Araujo Nobre, Miguel De" sort="Araujo Nobre, Miguel De" uniqKey="Araujo Nobre M" first="Miguel De" last="Araújo Nobre">Miguel De Araújo Nobre</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Research and Development Department, Malo Clinic, Lisbon, Portugal.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lopes, Armando" sort="Lopes, Armando" uniqKey="Lopes A" first="Armando" last="Lopes">Armando Lopes</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Oral Surgery Department, Malo Clinic, Lisbon, Portugal.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Rodrigues, Rolando" sort="Rodrigues, Rolando" uniqKey="Rodrigues R" first="Rolando" last="Rodrigues">Rolando Rodrigues</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Prosthodontics Department, Malo Clinic, Lisbon, Portugal.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2015">2015</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:25273895</idno><idno type="pmid">25273895</idno><idno type="doi">10.1111/jopr.12228</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000C79</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000C79</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Double Full-Arch Versus Single Full-Arch, Four Implant-Supported Rehabilitations: A Retrospective, 5-Year Cohort Study.</title><author><name sortKey="Mal, Paulo" sort="Mal, Paulo" uniqKey="Mal P" first="Paulo" last="Mal">Paulo Mal</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Oral Surgery Department, Malo Clinic, Lisbon, Portugal.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Araujo Nobre, Miguel De" sort="Araujo Nobre, Miguel De" uniqKey="Araujo Nobre M" first="Miguel De" last="Araújo Nobre">Miguel De Araújo Nobre</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Research and Development Department, Malo Clinic, Lisbon, Portugal.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lopes, Armando" sort="Lopes, Armando" uniqKey="Lopes A" first="Armando" last="Lopes">Armando Lopes</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Oral Surgery Department, Malo Clinic, Lisbon, Portugal.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Rodrigues, Rolando" sort="Rodrigues, Rolando" uniqKey="Rodrigues R" first="Rolando" last="Rodrigues">Rolando Rodrigues</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Prosthodontics Department, Malo Clinic, Lisbon, Portugal.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists</title><idno type="eISSN">1532-849X</idno><imprint><date when="2015" type="published">2015</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Bone Loss (etiology)</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Retrospective Studies</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="etiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Bone Loss</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Retrospective Studies</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">To report the 5-year outcome of the All-on-4 treatment concept comparing double full-arch (G1) and single-arch (G2) groups.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">25273895</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2017</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>11</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2017</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>11</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1532-849X</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>24</Volume><Issue>4</Issue><PubDate><Year>2015</Year><Month>Jun</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Prosthodont</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Double Full-Arch Versus Single Full-Arch, Four Implant-Supported Rehabilitations: A Retrospective, 5-Year Cohort Study.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>263-70</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1111/jopr.12228</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="PURPOSE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">To report the 5-year outcome of the All-on-4 treatment concept comparing double full-arch (G1) and single-arch (G2) groups.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="MATERIALS AND METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">This retrospective cohort study included 110 patients (68 women and 42 men, average age of 55.5 years) with 440 NobelSpeedy groovy implants. One hundred sixty-five full-arch, fixed, immediately loaded prostheses in both jaws were followed for 5 years. G1 consisted of 55 patients with double-arch rehabilitations occluded with implant-supported fixed prostheses, and G2 consisted of 55 patients with maxillary single-arch rehabilitations or mandibular single-arch rehabilitations occluded with natural teeth or removable prostheses. The groups were matched for age (±6 years) and gender. Primary outcome measures were cumulative prosthetic (both interim and definitive) and implant survival (Kaplan-Meier product limit estimator). Secondary outcome measures were marginal bone levels at 5 years (through periapical radiographs and using the patient as unit of analysis) and the incidence of mechanical and biological complications. Differences in survival curves (log-rank test), marginal bone level (Mann-Whitney U test), and complications (chi-square test) were compared inferentially between the two groups using the patient as unit of analysis with significance level set at p ≤ 0.05.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">No dropouts occurred. Prosthetic survival was 100%. Five patients lost 5 implants (G1: n = 3; G2: n = 2) before 1 year, rendering an estimated cumulative survival rate of 95.5% (G1: 94.5%; G2: 96.4%; Kaplan-Meier, p = 0.645, nonsignificant). The average (SD) marginal bone level was 1.56 mm (0.89) at 5 years [G1: 1.45 mm (0.77); G2: 1.67 mm (0.99); p = 0.414]. The incidence rate of mechanical complications (in both interim and definitive prostheses) was 0.16 and 0.13 for G1 and G2, respectively (p = 0.032). The incidence rate of biological complications was 0.06 and 0.05 for G1 and G2, respectively (p = 0.669).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Based on the results, rehabilitating double- or single-arch edentulous patients did not yield significant differences on survival curves. The incidence of mechanical complications was significantly higher for double-arch rehabilitated patients but nevertheless, these mechanical complications did not affect the long-term survival of either the prostheses or the implants.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>© 2014 by the American College of Prosthodontists.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Maló</LastName><ForeName>Paulo</ForeName><Initials>P</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Oral Surgery Department, Malo Clinic, Lisbon, Portugal.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Araújo Nobre</LastName><ForeName>Miguel De</ForeName><Initials>MD</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Research and Development Department, Malo Clinic, Lisbon, Portugal.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Lopes</LastName><ForeName>Armando</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Oral Surgery Department, Malo Clinic, Lisbon, Portugal.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Rodrigues</LastName><ForeName>Rolando</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Prosthodontics Department, Malo Clinic, Lisbon, Portugal.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2014</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>01</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>J Prosthodont</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9301275</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1059-941X</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016301" MajorTopicYN="N">Alveolar Bone Loss</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000209" MajorTopicYN="N">etiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019232" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Restoration Failure</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005500" MajorTopicYN="N">Follow-Up Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012189" MajorTopicYN="N">Retrospective Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016896" MajorTopicYN="N">Treatment Outcome</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">All-on-4</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Dental implants</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">immediate function</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2014</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>10</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2014</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>3</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2014</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>3</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2017</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>12</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25273895</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1111/jopr.12228</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000C79 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000C79 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:25273895
|texte= Double Full-Arch Versus Single Full-Arch, Four Implant-Supported Rehabilitations: A Retrospective, 5-Year Cohort Study.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:25273895" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |