The Relationship between Biofilm and Physical-Chemical Properties of Implant Abutment Materials for Successful Dental Implants.
Identifieur interne : 000C78 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000C77; suivant : 000C79The Relationship between Biofilm and Physical-Chemical Properties of Implant Abutment Materials for Successful Dental Implants.
Auteurs : Erica Dorigatti De Avila ; Rafael Scaf De Molon ; Carlos Eduardo Vergani ; Francisco De Assis Mollo ; Vehid SalihSource :
- Materials (Basel, Switzerland) [ 1996-1944 ] ; 2014.
Abstract
The aim of this review was to investigate the relationship between biofilm and peri-implant disease, with an emphasis on the types of implant abutment surfaces. Individuals with periodontal disease typically have a large amount of pathogenic microorganisms in the periodontal pocket. If the individuals lose their teeth, these microorganisms remain viable inside the mouth and can directly influence peri-implant microbiota. Metal implants offer a suitable solution, but similarly, these remaining bacteria can adhere on abutment implant surfaces, induce peri-implantitis causing potential destruction of the alveolar bone near to the implant threads and cause the subsequent loss of the implant. Studies have demonstrated differences in biofilm formation on dental materials and these variations can be associated with both physical and chemical characteristics of the surfaces. In the case of partially edentulous patients affected by periodontal disease, the ideal type of implant abutments utilized should be one that adheres the least or negligible amounts of periodontopathogenic bacteria. Therefore, it is of clinically relevance to know how the bacteria behave on different types of surfaces in order to develop new materials and/or new types of treatment surfaces, which will reduce or inhibit adhesion of pathogenic microorganisms, and, thus, restrict the use of the abutments with indication propensity for bacterial adhesion.
DOI: 10.3390/ma7053651
PubMed: 28788641
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:28788641Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The Relationship between Biofilm and Physical-Chemical Properties of Implant Abutment Materials for Successful Dental Implants.</title><author><name sortKey="De Avila, Erica Dorigatti" sort="De Avila, Erica Dorigatti" uniqKey="De Avila E" first="Erica Dorigatti" last="De Avila">Erica Dorigatti De Avila</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry at Araraquara, University Estadual Paulista-UNESP, 1680, Araraquara, São Paulo 14801-903, Brazil. erica.fobusp@yahoo.com.br.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Molon, Rafael Scaf" sort="De Molon, Rafael Scaf" uniqKey="De Molon R" first="Rafael Scaf" last="De Molon">Rafael Scaf De Molon</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Diagnostic and Surgery, School of Dentistry at Araraquara, University Estadual Paulista-UNESP, Araraquara, São Paulo 14801-903, Brazil. molon.foar@yahoo.com.br.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vergani, Carlos Eduardo" sort="Vergani, Carlos Eduardo" uniqKey="Vergani C" first="Carlos Eduardo" last="Vergani">Carlos Eduardo Vergani</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry at Araraquara, University Estadual Paulista-UNESP, 1680, Araraquara, São Paulo 14801-903, Brazil. vergani@foar.unespv.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Assis Mollo, Francisco" sort="De Assis Mollo, Francisco" uniqKey="De Assis Mollo F" first="Francisco" last="De Assis Mollo">Francisco De Assis Mollo</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry at Araraquara, University Estadual Paulista-UNESP, 1680, Araraquara, São Paulo 14801-903, Brazil. mollo@foar.unesp.br.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Salih, Vehid" sort="Salih, Vehid" uniqKey="Salih V" first="Vehid" last="Salih">Vehid Salih</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Peninsula School of Medicine & Dentistry, Plymouth University, C402, Portland Square, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon, PL4 8AA, UK. vehid.salih@plymouth.ac.uk.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2014">2014</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:28788641</idno><idno type="pmid">28788641</idno><idno type="doi">10.3390/ma7053651</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000C78</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000C78</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">The Relationship between Biofilm and Physical-Chemical Properties of Implant Abutment Materials for Successful Dental Implants.</title><author><name sortKey="De Avila, Erica Dorigatti" sort="De Avila, Erica Dorigatti" uniqKey="De Avila E" first="Erica Dorigatti" last="De Avila">Erica Dorigatti De Avila</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry at Araraquara, University Estadual Paulista-UNESP, 1680, Araraquara, São Paulo 14801-903, Brazil. erica.fobusp@yahoo.com.br.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Molon, Rafael Scaf" sort="De Molon, Rafael Scaf" uniqKey="De Molon R" first="Rafael Scaf" last="De Molon">Rafael Scaf De Molon</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Diagnostic and Surgery, School of Dentistry at Araraquara, University Estadual Paulista-UNESP, Araraquara, São Paulo 14801-903, Brazil. molon.foar@yahoo.com.br.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vergani, Carlos Eduardo" sort="Vergani, Carlos Eduardo" uniqKey="Vergani C" first="Carlos Eduardo" last="Vergani">Carlos Eduardo Vergani</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry at Araraquara, University Estadual Paulista-UNESP, 1680, Araraquara, São Paulo 14801-903, Brazil. vergani@foar.unespv.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Assis Mollo, Francisco" sort="De Assis Mollo, Francisco" uniqKey="De Assis Mollo F" first="Francisco" last="De Assis Mollo">Francisco De Assis Mollo</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry at Araraquara, University Estadual Paulista-UNESP, 1680, Araraquara, São Paulo 14801-903, Brazil. mollo@foar.unesp.br.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Salih, Vehid" sort="Salih, Vehid" uniqKey="Salih V" first="Vehid" last="Salih">Vehid Salih</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Peninsula School of Medicine & Dentistry, Plymouth University, C402, Portland Square, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon, PL4 8AA, UK. vehid.salih@plymouth.ac.uk.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Materials (Basel, Switzerland)</title><idno type="ISSN">1996-1944</idno><imprint><date when="2014" type="published">2014</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The aim of this review was to investigate the relationship between biofilm and peri-implant disease, with an emphasis on the types of implant abutment surfaces. Individuals with periodontal disease typically have a large amount of pathogenic microorganisms in the periodontal pocket. If the individuals lose their teeth, these microorganisms remain viable inside the mouth and can directly influence peri-implant microbiota. Metal implants offer a suitable solution, but similarly, these remaining bacteria can adhere on abutment implant surfaces, induce peri-implantitis causing potential destruction of the alveolar bone near to the implant threads and cause the subsequent loss of the implant. Studies have demonstrated differences in biofilm formation on dental materials and these variations can be associated with both physical and chemical characteristics of the surfaces. In the case of partially edentulous patients affected by periodontal disease, the ideal type of implant abutments utilized should be one that adheres the least or negligible amounts of periodontopathogenic bacteria. Therefore, it is of clinically relevance to know how the bacteria behave on different types of surfaces in order to develop new materials and/or new types of treatment surfaces, which will reduce or inhibit adhesion of pathogenic microorganisms, and, thus, restrict the use of the abutments with indication propensity for bacterial adhesion.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="PubMed-not-MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">28788641</PMID><DateRevised><Year>2017</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>13</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">1996-1944</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>7</Volume><Issue>5</Issue><PubDate><Year>2014</Year><Month>May</Month><Day>07</Day></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Materials (Basel, Switzerland)</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Materials (Basel)</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>The Relationship between Biofilm and Physical-Chemical Properties of Implant Abutment Materials for Successful Dental Implants.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>3651-3662</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.3390/ma7053651</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>The aim of this review was to investigate the relationship between biofilm and peri-implant disease, with an emphasis on the types of implant abutment surfaces. Individuals with periodontal disease typically have a large amount of pathogenic microorganisms in the periodontal pocket. If the individuals lose their teeth, these microorganisms remain viable inside the mouth and can directly influence peri-implant microbiota. Metal implants offer a suitable solution, but similarly, these remaining bacteria can adhere on abutment implant surfaces, induce peri-implantitis causing potential destruction of the alveolar bone near to the implant threads and cause the subsequent loss of the implant. Studies have demonstrated differences in biofilm formation on dental materials and these variations can be associated with both physical and chemical characteristics of the surfaces. In the case of partially edentulous patients affected by periodontal disease, the ideal type of implant abutments utilized should be one that adheres the least or negligible amounts of periodontopathogenic bacteria. Therefore, it is of clinically relevance to know how the bacteria behave on different types of surfaces in order to develop new materials and/or new types of treatment surfaces, which will reduce or inhibit adhesion of pathogenic microorganisms, and, thus, restrict the use of the abutments with indication propensity for bacterial adhesion.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>de Avila</LastName><ForeName>Erica Dorigatti</ForeName><Initials>ED</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry at Araraquara, University Estadual Paulista-UNESP, 1680, Araraquara, São Paulo 14801-903, Brazil. erica.fobusp@yahoo.com.br.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>de Molon</LastName><ForeName>Rafael Scaf</ForeName><Initials>RS</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Diagnostic and Surgery, School of Dentistry at Araraquara, University Estadual Paulista-UNESP, Araraquara, São Paulo 14801-903, Brazil. molon.foar@yahoo.com.br.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Vergani</LastName><ForeName>Carlos Eduardo</ForeName><Initials>CE</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry at Araraquara, University Estadual Paulista-UNESP, 1680, Araraquara, São Paulo 14801-903, Brazil. vergani@foar.unespv.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>de Assis Mollo</LastName><ForeName>Francisco</ForeName><Initials>F</Initials><Suffix>Jr</Suffix><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry at Araraquara, University Estadual Paulista-UNESP, 1680, Araraquara, São Paulo 14801-903, Brazil. mollo@foar.unesp.br.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Salih</LastName><ForeName>Vehid</ForeName><Initials>V</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Peninsula School of Medicine & Dentistry, Plymouth University, C402, Portland Square, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon, PL4 8AA, UK. vehid.salih@plymouth.ac.uk.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016454">Review</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2014</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>07</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Switzerland</Country><MedlineTA>Materials (Basel)</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101555929</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1996-1944</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Periodontol. 2005 Sep;76(9):1490-5</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16171437</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009 Mar;11(1):24-36</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18384407</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Acta Biomater. 2008 Sep;4(5):1518-29</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18430620</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Apr;72(4):2837-48</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16597990</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Appl Bacteriol. 1990 Oct;69(4):557-62</RefSource><PMID Version="1">2127266</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Eur J Oral Sci. 2010 Aug;118(4):357-63</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20662908</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969;3(2):81-100</RefSource><PMID Version="1">4924041</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Jul;24(7):831-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22509797</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Biomed Mater Res. 1997 Sep 5;36(3):387-92</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9260109</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Osaka Univ Dent Sch. 1994 Dec;34:37-44</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8935092</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Prosthodont. 2003 Nov-Dec;16(6):602-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14714838</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Biomaterials. 1997 Jul;18(13):903-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9199759</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009 Feb;88(2):519-29</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18561291</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Biomaterials. 2011 Jul;32(19):4358-68</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21421270</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Parodontol. 1991 Feb;10(1):11-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">1906537</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Periodontol. 2009 Dec;80(12):1991-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19961382</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Res Microbiol. 2003 Jun;154(5):329-35</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12837508</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Feb;17(1):25-37</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16441782</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Clin Periodontol. 1995 Jan;22(1):1-14</RefSource><PMID Version="1">7706534</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Aug;18(4):501-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17501978</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Periodontol. 1999 Feb;70(2):131-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10102550</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Implant Dent. 2007 Dec;16(4):404-12</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18091169</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000 Dec;11(6):511-20</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11168244</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Aug;24 Suppl A100:49-56</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22150723</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Biofabrication. 2012 Jun;4(2):025001</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22406493</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Prosthodont. 2007 Jul-Aug;20(4):419-22</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17695877</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Clin Periodontol. 2008 May;35(5):438-62</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18433385</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Periodontol. 2003 Mar;74(3):346-52</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12710754</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996 Jun;7(2):143-52</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9002833</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Eur J Oral Sci. 2004 Dec;112(6):516-22</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15560835</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Mar;23(3):301-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21492236</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Crit Rev Microbiol. 1989;17(2):137-59</RefSource><PMID Version="1">2692602</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996 Dec;7(4):329-36</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9151599</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 1992 Sep;3(3):112-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">1290791</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Prosthodont. 2008 May-Jun;21(3):223-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18548960</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Aug;14(4):381-90</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12869000</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Bacteriol. 2009 Nov;191(22):6804-11</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19749049</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Dent Mater. 1997 Jul;13(4):258-69</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11696906</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2010 Oct;95(1):101-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20725954</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Oct;17 Suppl 2:68-81</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16968383</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Bacteriol. 2000 Dec;182(24):7067-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11092870</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001 Jun;12(3):189-95</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11359474</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 1991 Jul-Sep;2(3):135-44</RefSource><PMID Version="1">1843467</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Mar-Apr;23(2):327-34</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18548931</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Infect Immun. 1988 May;56(5):1314-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">2451642</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002 Nov-Dec;17 (6):799-810</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12507239</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Oral Implantol. 1983;11(1):93-100</RefSource><PMID Version="1">6584637</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Arch Oral Biol. 2009 Jun;54(6):595-601</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19375069</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007 Sep;34(9):577-88</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17619090</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Implant Dent. 2011 Apr;20(2):e14-23</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21448015</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Aug;24(8):934-40</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22551347</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Periodontol. 2004 Feb;75(2):292-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15068118</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Eur J Oral Sci. 1998 Feb;106(1):527-51</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9527353</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Clin Periodontol. 1998 Feb;25(2):134-44</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9495612</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Clin Periodontol. 2009 Sep;36(9):739-49</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19637996</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Clin Periodontol. 1994 Mar;21(3):189-93</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8157772</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Mar;24(3):347-54</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22931471</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995 Nov-Dec;10(6):702-11</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8530173</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004 Feb;2(2):95-108</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15040259</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Clin Periodontol. 2006 Apr;33(4):290-5</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16553638</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Biomaterials. 1995 Nov;16(17):1339-43</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8573673</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Jun;14(3):329-39</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12755783</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Sep;63(9 Suppl 2):89-96</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16125019</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Mar;25(3):337-43</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23316996</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32 Suppl 6:314-25</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16128846</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Esthet Restor Dent. 2003;15(1):10-23; discussion 24</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12638769</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 1993 Aug;70(2):141-4</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8396644</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Clin Periodontol. 2006 Dec;33(12):929-35</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17092244</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999 Nov-Dec;14(6):798-810</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10612916</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Clin Periodontol. 2007 May;34(5):367-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17448041</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Jun;70(6):3758-60</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15184186</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Dent Res. 2011 Jul;90(7):900-5</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21447697</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Jun;22(6):571-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21054554</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Dent Mater. 2008 Mar;24(3):299-307</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17659331</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014 Oct;102(10):3618-30</RefSource><PMID Version="1">24248891</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002 Nov-Dec;17(6):793-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12507238</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Mar;19(3):242-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18177429</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Feb;18(1):13-20</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17224018</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Hosp Infect. 2009 Jun;72 (2):104-10</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19329223</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Periodontol 2000. 1999 Jun;20:168-238</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10522227</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">biofilm</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">dental implants</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">titanium</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">zirconia</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2014</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>08</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2014</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>13</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2014</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>16</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2017</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>10</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2014</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>7</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2014</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>7</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28788641</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">ma7053651</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.3390/ma7053651</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC5453239</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000C78 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000C78 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:28788641
|texte= The Relationship between Biofilm and Physical-Chemical Properties of Implant Abutment Materials for Successful Dental Implants.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:28788641" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |