EdenteV1, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 000053

Zygomatic Bone-to-Implant Contact in 77 Patients With Partially or Completely Edentulous Maxillas

Identifieur interne : 000053 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000052; suivant : 000054

Zygomatic Bone-to-Implant Contact in 77 Patients With Partially or Completely Edentulous Maxillas

Auteurs : Thomas J. Balshi ; Glenn J. Wolfinger ; Nicolas J. Shuscavage ; Stephen F. Balshi

Source :

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery [ 0278-2391 ] ; 2012.

RBID : Pascal:12-0354853

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Edentation, Chirurgie, Arcade zygomatique, Os, Implant, Maxillaire, Stomatologie, Traitement, Sujet contact.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Bone, Edentulousness, Implant, Maxillary, Stomatology, Surgery, Treatment, Zygomatic arch.

Abstract

Purpose: Specifically with zygomatic implants, the bone-to-implant contact (BIC) at the zygomatic bone correlates with the survival of the implant because there is little anchorage at the alveolus. The purpose of this retrospective study was to view and measure the BIC of zygomatic implants in the zygomatic bone. Materials and Methods: The patients in this study received zygomatic implants at a single private dental implant center. All patients were treated with the same immediate-loading protocol followed by postoperative cone beam computed tomography. The scans were exported to a computer-aided design system, where the BICs could be measured digitally. The BIC was analyzed by gender, and any statistical difference was determined by analysis of variance. Results: The study sample was composed of 77 patients (62.3% women) receiving 173 zygomatic implants. The mean age of the sample was 59 ± 8.7 years. The mean BIC was 15.3 ± 5.6 mm (range, 4.9 to 32.9 mm) in the zygomatic bone. On average, 35.9% ± 11.7% (range, 12.2% to 67.3%) of the implant came into contact with the zygomatic bone. The average BIC in men was 16.5 ± 6.0 mm, and the average BIC in women was 14.7 ± 5.4 mm, a statistically significant difference by analysis of variance (P < .05). Conclusions: Evidence from this report indicates the zygomatic BIC varies greatly from patient to patient. These data show that the typical male patient has a greater zygomatic BIC than the typical female patient; however, these data do not support the hypothesis that the zygomatic BIC influences the zygomatic implant survival rate.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0278-2391`
A02	`01`			`@0 JOMSDA`
A03		`1`		`@0 J. oral maxillofac. surg.`
A05				`@2 70`
A06				`@2 9`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Zygomatic Bone-to-Implant Contact in 77 Patients With Partially or Completely Edentulous Maxillas`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 BALSHI (Thomas J.)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 WOLFINGER (Glenn J.)`
A11	`03`	`1`		`@1 SHUSCAVAGE (Nicolas J.)`
A11	`04`	`1`		`@1 BALSHI (Stephen F.)`
A14	`01`			`@1 PI Dental Center, Institute for Facial Esthetics @2 Fort Washington, PA @3 USA @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut. @Z 3 aut. @Z 4 aut.`
A20				`@1 2065-2069`
A21				`@1 2012`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 3005 @5 354000504462940090`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2012 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 34 ref.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 12-0354853`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery`
A66	`01`			`@0 USA`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 Purpose: Specifically with zygomatic implants, the bone-to-implant contact (BIC) at the zygomatic bone correlates with the survival of the implant because there is little anchorage at the alveolus. The purpose of this retrospective study was to view and measure the BIC of zygomatic implants in the zygomatic bone. Materials and Methods: The patients in this study received zygomatic implants at a single private dental implant center. All patients were treated with the same immediate-loading protocol followed by postoperative cone beam computed tomography. The scans were exported to a computer-aided design system, where the BICs could be measured digitally. The BIC was analyzed by gender, and any statistical difference was determined by analysis of variance. Results: The study sample was composed of 77 patients (62.3% women) receiving 173 zygomatic implants. The mean age of the sample was 59 ± 8.7 years. The mean BIC was 15.3 ± 5.6 mm (range, 4.9 to 32.9 mm) in the zygomatic bone. On average, 35.9% ± 11.7% (range, 12.2% to 67.3%) of the implant came into contact with the zygomatic bone. The average BIC in men was 16.5 ± 6.0 mm, and the average BIC in women was 14.7 ± 5.4 mm, a statistically significant difference by analysis of variance (P < .05). Conclusions: Evidence from this report indicates the zygomatic BIC varies greatly from patient to patient. These data show that the typical male patient has a greater zygomatic BIC than the typical female patient; however, these data do not support the hypothesis that the zygomatic BIC influences the zygomatic implant survival rate.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 002B10C02`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Edentation @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Edentulousness @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Edentación @5 01`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Chirurgie @5 04`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Surgery @5 04`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cirugía @5 04`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Arcade zygomatique @5 07`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Zygomatic arch @5 07`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Arco cigomático @5 07`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Os @5 08`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Bone @5 08`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Hueso @5 08`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Implant @5 09`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Implant @5 09`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Implante @5 09`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Maxillaire @5 13`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Maxillary @5 13`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Maxilar @5 13`
C03	`07`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Stomatologie @5 14`
C03	`07`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Stomatology @5 14`
C03	`07`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estomatología @5 14`
C03	`08`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Traitement @5 30`
C03	`08`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Treatment @5 30`
C03	`08`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Tratamiento @5 30`
C03	`09`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Sujet contact @4 INC @5 86`
C07	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Pathologie dentaire @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Dental disease @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Diente patología @5 37`
N21				`@1 275`
N44	`01`			`@1 OTO`
N82				`@1 OTO`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	PASCAL 12-0354853 INIST
ET :	Zygomatic Bone-to-Implant Contact in 77 Patients With Partially or Completely Edentulous Maxillas
AU :	BALSHI (Thomas J.); WOLFINGER (Glenn J.); SHUSCAVAGE (Nicolas J.); BALSHI (Stephen F.)
AF :	PI Dental Center, Institute for Facial Esthetics/Fort Washington, PA/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO :	Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery; ISSN 0278-2391; Coden JOMSDA; Etats-Unis; Da. 2012; Vol. 70; No. 9; Pp. 2065-2069; Bibl. 34 ref.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	Purpose: Specifically with zygomatic implants, the bone-to-implant contact (BIC) at the zygomatic bone correlates with the survival of the implant because there is little anchorage at the alveolus. The purpose of this retrospective study was to view and measure the BIC of zygomatic implants in the zygomatic bone. Materials and Methods: The patients in this study received zygomatic implants at a single private dental implant center. All patients were treated with the same immediate-loading protocol followed by postoperative cone beam computed tomography. The scans were exported to a computer-aided design system, where the BICs could be measured digitally. The BIC was analyzed by gender, and any statistical difference was determined by analysis of variance. Results: The study sample was composed of 77 patients (62.3% women) receiving 173 zygomatic implants. The mean age of the sample was 59 ± 8.7 years. The mean BIC was 15.3 ± 5.6 mm (range, 4.9 to 32.9 mm) in the zygomatic bone. On average, 35.9% ± 11.7% (range, 12.2% to 67.3%) of the implant came into contact with the zygomatic bone. The average BIC in men was 16.5 ± 6.0 mm, and the average BIC in women was 14.7 ± 5.4 mm, a statistically significant difference by analysis of variance (P < .05). Conclusions: Evidence from this report indicates the zygomatic BIC varies greatly from patient to patient. These data show that the typical male patient has a greater zygomatic BIC than the typical female patient; however, these data do not support the hypothesis that the zygomatic BIC influences the zygomatic implant survival rate.
CC :	002B10C02
FD :	Edentation; Chirurgie; Arcade zygomatique; Os; Implant; Maxillaire; Stomatologie; Traitement; Sujet contact
FG :	Pathologie dentaire
ED :	Edentulousness; Surgery; Zygomatic arch; Bone; Implant; Maxillary; Stomatology; Treatment
EG :	Dental disease
SD :	Edentación; Cirugía; Arco cigomático; Hueso; Implante; Maxilar; Estomatología; Tratamiento
LO :	INIST-3005.354000504462940090
ID :	12-0354853

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:12-0354853

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Zygomatic Bone-to-Implant Contact in 77 Patients With Partially or Completely Edentulous Maxillas</title>
<author><name sortKey="Balshi, Thomas J" sort="Balshi, Thomas J" uniqKey="Balshi T" first="Thomas J." last="Balshi">Thomas J. Balshi</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>PI Dental Center, Institute for Facial Esthetics</s1>
<s2>Fort Washington, PA</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Wolfinger, Glenn J" sort="Wolfinger, Glenn J" uniqKey="Wolfinger G" first="Glenn J." last="Wolfinger">Glenn J. Wolfinger</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>PI Dental Center, Institute for Facial Esthetics</s1>
<s2>Fort Washington, PA</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Shuscavage, Nicolas J" sort="Shuscavage, Nicolas J" uniqKey="Shuscavage N" first="Nicolas J." last="Shuscavage">Nicolas J. Shuscavage</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>PI Dental Center, Institute for Facial Esthetics</s1>
<s2>Fort Washington, PA</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Balshi, Stephen F" sort="Balshi, Stephen F" uniqKey="Balshi S" first="Stephen F." last="Balshi">Stephen F. Balshi</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>PI Dental Center, Institute for Facial Esthetics</s1>
<s2>Fort Washington, PA</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">12-0354853</idno>
<date when="2012">2012</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 12-0354853 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:12-0354853</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000053</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Zygomatic Bone-to-Implant Contact in 77 Patients With Partially or Completely Edentulous Maxillas</title>
<author><name sortKey="Balshi, Thomas J" sort="Balshi, Thomas J" uniqKey="Balshi T" first="Thomas J." last="Balshi">Thomas J. Balshi</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>PI Dental Center, Institute for Facial Esthetics</s1>
<s2>Fort Washington, PA</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Wolfinger, Glenn J" sort="Wolfinger, Glenn J" uniqKey="Wolfinger G" first="Glenn J." last="Wolfinger">Glenn J. Wolfinger</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>PI Dental Center, Institute for Facial Esthetics</s1>
<s2>Fort Washington, PA</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Shuscavage, Nicolas J" sort="Shuscavage, Nicolas J" uniqKey="Shuscavage N" first="Nicolas J." last="Shuscavage">Nicolas J. Shuscavage</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>PI Dental Center, Institute for Facial Esthetics</s1>
<s2>Fort Washington, PA</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Balshi, Stephen F" sort="Balshi, Stephen F" uniqKey="Balshi S" first="Stephen F." last="Balshi">Stephen F. Balshi</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>PI Dental Center, Institute for Facial Esthetics</s1>
<s2>Fort Washington, PA</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. oral maxillofac. surg.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0278-2391</idno>
<imprint><date when="2012">2012</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. oral maxillofac. surg.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0278-2391</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone</term>
<term>Edentulousness</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Maxillary</term>
<term>Stomatology</term>
<term>Surgery</term>
<term>Treatment</term>
<term>Zygomatic arch</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Edentation</term>
<term>Chirurgie</term>
<term>Arcade zygomatique</term>
<term>Os</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Maxillaire</term>
<term>Stomatologie</term>
<term>Traitement</term>
<term>Sujet contact</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Purpose: Specifically with zygomatic implants, the bone-to-implant contact (BIC) at the zygomatic bone correlates with the survival of the implant because there is little anchorage at the alveolus. The purpose of this retrospective study was to view and measure the BIC of zygomatic implants in the zygomatic bone. Materials and Methods: The patients in this study received zygomatic implants at a single private dental implant center. All patients were treated with the same immediate-loading protocol followed by postoperative cone beam computed tomography. The scans were exported to a computer-aided design system, where the BICs could be measured digitally. The BIC was analyzed by gender, and any statistical difference was determined by analysis of variance. Results: The study sample was composed of 77 patients (62.3% women) receiving 173 zygomatic implants. The mean age of the sample was 59 ± 8.7 years. The mean BIC was 15.3 ± 5.6 mm (range, 4.9 to 32.9 mm) in the zygomatic bone. On average, 35.9% ± 11.7% (range, 12.2% to 67.3%) of the implant came into contact with the zygomatic bone. The average BIC in men was 16.5 ± 6.0 mm, and the average BIC in women was 14.7 ± 5.4 mm, a statistically significant difference by analysis of variance (P < .05). Conclusions: Evidence from this report indicates the zygomatic BIC varies greatly from patient to patient. These data show that the typical male patient has a greater zygomatic BIC than the typical female patient; however, these data do not support the hypothesis that the zygomatic BIC influences the zygomatic implant survival rate.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0278-2391</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>JOMSDA</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>J. oral maxillofac. surg.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>70</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>9</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Zygomatic Bone-to-Implant Contact in 77 Patients With Partially or Completely Edentulous Maxillas</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>BALSHI (Thomas J.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>WOLFINGER (Glenn J.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>SHUSCAVAGE (Nicolas J.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>BALSHI (Stephen F.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>PI Dental Center, Institute for Facial Esthetics</s1>
<s2>Fort Washington, PA</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>2065-2069</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2012</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>3005</s2>
<s5>354000504462940090</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2012 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>34 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>12-0354853</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Purpose: Specifically with zygomatic implants, the bone-to-implant contact (BIC) at the zygomatic bone correlates with the survival of the implant because there is little anchorage at the alveolus. The purpose of this retrospective study was to view and measure the BIC of zygomatic implants in the zygomatic bone. Materials and Methods: The patients in this study received zygomatic implants at a single private dental implant center. All patients were treated with the same immediate-loading protocol followed by postoperative cone beam computed tomography. The scans were exported to a computer-aided design system, where the BICs could be measured digitally. The BIC was analyzed by gender, and any statistical difference was determined by analysis of variance. Results: The study sample was composed of 77 patients (62.3% women) receiving 173 zygomatic implants. The mean age of the sample was 59 ± 8.7 years. The mean BIC was 15.3 ± 5.6 mm (range, 4.9 to 32.9 mm) in the zygomatic bone. On average, 35.9% ± 11.7% (range, 12.2% to 67.3%) of the implant came into contact with the zygomatic bone. The average BIC in men was 16.5 ± 6.0 mm, and the average BIC in women was 14.7 ± 5.4 mm, a statistically significant difference by analysis of variance (P < .05). Conclusions: Evidence from this report indicates the zygomatic BIC varies greatly from patient to patient. These data show that the typical male patient has a greater zygomatic BIC than the typical female patient; however, these data do not support the hypothesis that the zygomatic BIC influences the zygomatic implant survival rate.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B10C02</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Edentation</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Edentulousness</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Edentación</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Chirurgie</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Surgery</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cirugía</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Arcade zygomatique</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Zygomatic arch</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Arco cigomático</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Os</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Bone</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hueso</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Implant</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Implant</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Implante</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Maxillaire</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Maxillary</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Maxilar</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Stomatologie</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Stomatology</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estomatología</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Traitement</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Treatment</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Tratamiento</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Sujet contact</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>86</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Pathologie dentaire</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Dental disease</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Diente patología</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>275</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 12-0354853 INIST</NO>
<ET>Zygomatic Bone-to-Implant Contact in 77 Patients With Partially or Completely Edentulous Maxillas</ET>
<AU>BALSHI (Thomas J.); WOLFINGER (Glenn J.); SHUSCAVAGE (Nicolas J.); BALSHI (Stephen F.)</AU>
<AF>PI Dental Center, Institute for Facial Esthetics/Fort Washington, PA/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery; ISSN 0278-2391; Coden JOMSDA; Etats-Unis; Da. 2012; Vol. 70; No. 9; Pp. 2065-2069; Bibl. 34 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Purpose: Specifically with zygomatic implants, the bone-to-implant contact (BIC) at the zygomatic bone correlates with the survival of the implant because there is little anchorage at the alveolus. The purpose of this retrospective study was to view and measure the BIC of zygomatic implants in the zygomatic bone. Materials and Methods: The patients in this study received zygomatic implants at a single private dental implant center. All patients were treated with the same immediate-loading protocol followed by postoperative cone beam computed tomography. The scans were exported to a computer-aided design system, where the BICs could be measured digitally. The BIC was analyzed by gender, and any statistical difference was determined by analysis of variance. Results: The study sample was composed of 77 patients (62.3% women) receiving 173 zygomatic implants. The mean age of the sample was 59 ± 8.7 years. The mean BIC was 15.3 ± 5.6 mm (range, 4.9 to 32.9 mm) in the zygomatic bone. On average, 35.9% ± 11.7% (range, 12.2% to 67.3%) of the implant came into contact with the zygomatic bone. The average BIC in men was 16.5 ± 6.0 mm, and the average BIC in women was 14.7 ± 5.4 mm, a statistically significant difference by analysis of variance (P < .05). Conclusions: Evidence from this report indicates the zygomatic BIC varies greatly from patient to patient. These data show that the typical male patient has a greater zygomatic BIC than the typical female patient; however, these data do not support the hypothesis that the zygomatic BIC influences the zygomatic implant survival rate.</EA>
<CC>002B10C02</CC>
<FD>Edentation; Chirurgie; Arcade zygomatique; Os; Implant; Maxillaire; Stomatologie; Traitement; Sujet contact</FD>
<FG>Pathologie dentaire</FG>
<ED>Edentulousness; Surgery; Zygomatic arch; Bone; Implant; Maxillary; Stomatology; Treatment</ED>
<EG>Dental disease</EG>
<SD>Edentación; Cirugía; Arco cigomático; Hueso; Implante; Maxilar; Estomatología; Tratamiento</SD>
<LO>INIST-3005.354000504462940090</LO>
<ID>12-0354853</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000053 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000053 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:12-0354853
   |texte=   Zygomatic Bone-to-Implant Contact in 77 Patients With Partially or Completely Edentulous Maxillas
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Mon Dec 4 11:02:15 2017. Site generation: Tue Sep 29 19:14:38 2020

	Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté (maquette)
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté (maquette)

Zygomatic Bone-to-Implant Contact in 77 Patients With Partially or Completely Edentulous Maxillas

Zygomatic Bone-to-Implant Contact in 77 Patients With Partially or Completely Edentulous Maxillas

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri