Full rehabilitation with nobel clinician(®) and procera implant bridge(®): case report.
Identifieur interne : 000618 ( Ncbi/Merge ); précédent : 000617; suivant : 000619Full rehabilitation with nobel clinician(®) and procera implant bridge(®): case report.
Auteurs : D. Spinelli [Italie] ; L. Ottria ; G. De Vico ; R. Bollero ; A. Barlattani ; P. BolleroSource :
- ORAL & implantology [ 1974-5648 ] ; 2013.
Abstract
Implant surgery has been changing in different ways following improvements of computer technologies. Since its beginning, according to the original procedures of Branemårk system implants, guide-lines in implants-supported prosthetic rehabilitation have been founding on the placement of fixtures in a fairly upright position, after maxillary sinus floor elevation; while in the case of interforaminal rehabilitation, an upright distal implant may need to be placed anterior to the mental foramina without nerve damage (although the consequence would have been bilateral cantilevers to provide good chewing capacity). Some authors have proposed engaging the molar/tuberosity area: Bahat and Venturelli demonstrated these areas reliable and predictable alternative to distal cantilever prostheses or sinus elevation procedures. In recent years, the immediate loading of tilted implants with a provisional restoration has been proposed for the treatment of the atrophic maxilla. Tilted posterior implants in either arches could avoid (cantilever length) and provide to a better load distribution. Further studies have showed excellent outcomes for both tilted and axial implants; indeed this protocol allows to use longer implants, improve bone anchorage and avoid bone grafting procedures. Malò at al., in a retrospective clinical study, showed important results using two posterior tilted implants and two anterior non-tilted ones in the so-called All-on-four technique (Nobel Biocare, Göteborg, Sweden). Instead of the great loss of bone (amount and quality) in long-term edentuly the clinically documented computer-guided implantology software is able, through posterior tilted implants, to improve load distribution. Many authors have reported reduced surgical invasion (sinus grafting surgery is needless), shorter treatment time, lower cost, natural aesthetic profiles and functional bite.
PubMed: 24175051
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: 000636
- to stream PubMed, to step Curation: 000636
- to stream PubMed, to step Checkpoint: 000636
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:24175051Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Full rehabilitation with nobel clinician(®) and procera implant bridge(®): case report.</title><author><name sortKey="Spinelli, D" sort="Spinelli, D" uniqKey="Spinelli D" first="D" last="Spinelli">D. Spinelli</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Rome</settlement><region nuts="2">Latium</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ottria, L" sort="Ottria, L" uniqKey="Ottria L" first="L" last="Ottria">L. Ottria</name></author><author><name sortKey="De Vico, G" sort="De Vico, G" uniqKey="De Vico G" first="G" last="De Vico">G. De Vico</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bollero, R" sort="Bollero, R" uniqKey="Bollero R" first="R" last="Bollero">R. Bollero</name></author><author><name sortKey="Barlattani, A" sort="Barlattani, A" uniqKey="Barlattani A" first="A" last="Barlattani">A. Barlattani</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bollero, P" sort="Bollero, P" uniqKey="Bollero P" first="P" last="Bollero">P. Bollero</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2013">2013</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:24175051</idno><idno type="pmid">24175051</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000636</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000636</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000636</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">000636</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">000636</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">000636</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">000618</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Full rehabilitation with nobel clinician(®) and procera implant bridge(®): case report.</title><author><name sortKey="Spinelli, D" sort="Spinelli, D" uniqKey="Spinelli D" first="D" last="Spinelli">D. Spinelli</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Rome</settlement><region nuts="2">Latium</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ottria, L" sort="Ottria, L" uniqKey="Ottria L" first="L" last="Ottria">L. Ottria</name></author><author><name sortKey="De Vico, G" sort="De Vico, G" uniqKey="De Vico G" first="G" last="De Vico">G. De Vico</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bollero, R" sort="Bollero, R" uniqKey="Bollero R" first="R" last="Bollero">R. Bollero</name></author><author><name sortKey="Barlattani, A" sort="Barlattani, A" uniqKey="Barlattani A" first="A" last="Barlattani">A. Barlattani</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bollero, P" sort="Bollero, P" uniqKey="Bollero P" first="P" last="Bollero">P. Bollero</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">ORAL & implantology</title><idno type="ISSN">1974-5648</idno><imprint><date when="2013" type="published">2013</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Implant surgery has been changing in different ways following improvements of computer technologies. Since its beginning, according to the original procedures of Branemårk system implants, guide-lines in implants-supported prosthetic rehabilitation have been founding on the placement of fixtures in a fairly upright position, after maxillary sinus floor elevation; while in the case of interforaminal rehabilitation, an upright distal implant may need to be placed anterior to the mental foramina without nerve damage (although the consequence would have been bilateral cantilevers to provide good chewing capacity). Some authors have proposed engaging the molar/tuberosity area: Bahat and Venturelli demonstrated these areas reliable and predictable alternative to distal cantilever prostheses or sinus elevation procedures. In recent years, the immediate loading of tilted implants with a provisional restoration has been proposed for the treatment of the atrophic maxilla. Tilted posterior implants in either arches could avoid (cantilever length) and provide to a better load distribution. Further studies have showed excellent outcomes for both tilted and axial implants; indeed this protocol allows to use longer implants, improve bone anchorage and avoid bone grafting procedures. Malò at al., in a retrospective clinical study, showed important results using two posterior tilted implants and two anterior non-tilted ones in the so-called All-on-four technique (Nobel Biocare, Göteborg, Sweden). Instead of the great loss of bone (amount and quality) in long-term edentuly the clinically documented computer-guided implantology software is able, through posterior tilted implants, to improve load distribution. Many authors have reported reduced surgical invasion (sinus grafting surgery is needless), shorter treatment time, lower cost, natural aesthetic profiles and functional bite.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="PubMed-not-MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">24175051</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2013</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>31</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2017</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>20</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Electronic-eCollection"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">1974-5648</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>6</Volume><Issue>2</Issue><PubDate><Year>2013</Year></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>ORAL & implantology</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Oral Implantol (Rome)</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Full rehabilitation with nobel clinician(®) and procera implant bridge(®): case report.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>25-36</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>Implant surgery has been changing in different ways following improvements of computer technologies. Since its beginning, according to the original procedures of Branemårk system implants, guide-lines in implants-supported prosthetic rehabilitation have been founding on the placement of fixtures in a fairly upright position, after maxillary sinus floor elevation; while in the case of interforaminal rehabilitation, an upright distal implant may need to be placed anterior to the mental foramina without nerve damage (although the consequence would have been bilateral cantilevers to provide good chewing capacity). Some authors have proposed engaging the molar/tuberosity area: Bahat and Venturelli demonstrated these areas reliable and predictable alternative to distal cantilever prostheses or sinus elevation procedures. In recent years, the immediate loading of tilted implants with a provisional restoration has been proposed for the treatment of the atrophic maxilla. Tilted posterior implants in either arches could avoid (cantilever length) and provide to a better load distribution. Further studies have showed excellent outcomes for both tilted and axial implants; indeed this protocol allows to use longer implants, improve bone anchorage and avoid bone grafting procedures. Malò at al., in a retrospective clinical study, showed important results using two posterior tilted implants and two anterior non-tilted ones in the so-called All-on-four technique (Nobel Biocare, Göteborg, Sweden). Instead of the great loss of bone (amount and quality) in long-term edentuly the clinically documented computer-guided implantology software is able, through posterior tilted implants, to improve load distribution. Many authors have reported reduced surgical invasion (sinus grafting surgery is needless), shorter treatment time, lower cost, natural aesthetic profiles and functional bite.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Spinelli</LastName><ForeName>D</ForeName><Initials>D</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ottria</LastName><ForeName>L</ForeName><Initials>L</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>DE Vico</LastName><ForeName>G</ForeName><Initials>G</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Bollero</LastName><ForeName>R</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Barlattani</LastName><ForeName>A</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Bollero</LastName><ForeName>P</ForeName><Initials>P</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2013</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>15</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Italy</Country><MedlineTA>Oral Implantol (Rome)</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101574127</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1974-5648</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Appl Biomater Biomech. 2009 Jan-Apr;7(1):23-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20740435</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Can Dent Assoc. 2004 Jan;70(1):32</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14709253</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2005 Nov;26(11):802, 804-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16300235</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7 Suppl 1:S111-20</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16137096</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2006;8(3):161-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16919024</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000 May-Jun;15(3):405-14</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10874806</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7 Suppl 1:S1-12</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16137082</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Oral Implantol (Rome). 2010 Apr;3(2):10-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23285381</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Oral Implantol (Rome). 2008 Apr;1(1):2-14</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23285331</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001 Oct;12(5):495-502</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11564110</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2006 Nov-Dec;18(10 ):617-23</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17283690</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001 Feb;12 (1):79-84</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11168274</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999 Feb;28(1):31-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10065646</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5(3):154-60</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14575631</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5 Suppl 1:2-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12691645</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000 Sep-Oct;15(5):722-30</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11055139</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7 Suppl 1:S88-94</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16137093</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2002;4(2):69-77</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12121606</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999 Mar;57(3):281-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10077198</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Eur Radiol. 2003 Feb;13(2):366-76</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12599003</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Eur J Oral Sci. 1998 Feb;106(1):527-51</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9527353</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2001;3(1):39-49</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11441542</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Jun;97(6 Suppl):S35-43</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17618932</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Calif Dent Assoc. 2003 Dec;31(12 ):925-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14736045</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5(3):161-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14575632</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997 Dec;26(6):428-34</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9418144</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006 Jun;26(3):239-47</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16836166</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><OtherID Source="NLM">PMC3808939</OtherID><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">computer guided flapless implant placement</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">dental implants</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">immediate loading</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">prosthetic rehabilitation</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2013</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2013</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2013</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24175051</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3808939</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Italie</li></country><region><li>Latium</li></region><settlement><li>Rome</li></settlement></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Barlattani, A" sort="Barlattani, A" uniqKey="Barlattani A" first="A" last="Barlattani">A. Barlattani</name><name sortKey="Bollero, P" sort="Bollero, P" uniqKey="Bollero P" first="P" last="Bollero">P. Bollero</name><name sortKey="Bollero, R" sort="Bollero, R" uniqKey="Bollero R" first="R" last="Bollero">R. Bollero</name><name sortKey="De Vico, G" sort="De Vico, G" uniqKey="De Vico G" first="G" last="De Vico">G. De Vico</name><name sortKey="Ottria, L" sort="Ottria, L" uniqKey="Ottria L" first="L" last="Ottria">L. Ottria</name></noCountry><country name="Italie"><region name="Latium"><name sortKey="Spinelli, D" sort="Spinelli, D" uniqKey="Spinelli D" first="D" last="Spinelli">D. Spinelli</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV1/Data/Ncbi/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000618 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 000618 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV1
|flux= Ncbi
|étape= Merge
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:24175051
|texte= Full rehabilitation with nobel clinician(®) and procera implant bridge(®): case report.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Merge/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:24175051" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Merge/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |