Serveur d'exploration sur l'opéra

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Differential response of buddleia (Buddleia davidii Franch.) to ozone

Identifieur interne : 000C04 ( PascalFrancis/Curation ); précédent : 000C03; suivant : 000C05

Differential response of buddleia (Buddleia davidii Franch.) to ozone

Auteurs : D. A. Findley [États-Unis] ; G. J. Keever [États-Unis] ; A. H. Chappelka [États-Unis] ; D. J. Eakes [États-Unis] ; C. H. Gilliam [États-Unis]

Source :

RBID : Pascal:98-0163666

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Five cultivars of buddleia, Buddleia davidii Franch., were exposed to sub-ambient, ambient, and twice-ambient levels of ozone in open-top chambers for 8 weeks (June-August) during 1995. Plants were evaluated for foliar injury, growth index, and inflorescence characteristics during and following exposure. Destructive harvests were conducted at the end of the exposure period to determine dry weights of both above- and below-ground plant components. All cultivars had symptoms of visible injury in the twice- ambient treatment at both three and eight weeks after exposures began. No visible symptoms were observed at ambient ozone concentrations. At three weeks of exposure, 'Pink Delight' had the highest percentage of the leaves injured (PLI), 46. 2%, followed by 'Opera' with a PLI of 23.3%. The other three cultivars had similar PLls of less than 15%. After eight weeks of exposure, visible injury was equally severe on all cultivars with a mean PLI of 50.2% and mean Horsfall-Barratt rating of 5.4, indicating 12 to 25% of the leaf area was injured. No ozone x cultivar interaction was found for any growth variable measured. Across cultivars, growth index was reduced by 6%, total dry weight by 35%, and the number of developing floral buds and inflorescences by 29% for plants in twice-ambient ozone concentrations compared to ambient ozone concentrations. Percent biomass allocated to inflorescences was significantly greater for plants exposed to sub-ambient levels compared to those exposed to ozone at either ambient or twice-ambient concentrations. Results indicate that ozone levels similar to those in large urban areas in the southeastern United States have the potential to reduce growth and flowering of this important landscape plant.
pA  
A01 01  1    @0 0269-7491
A02 01      @0 ENVPAF
A03   1    @0 Environ. pollut. : (1987)
A05       @2 98
A06       @2 1
A08 01  1  ENG  @1 Differential response of buddleia (Buddleia davidii Franch.) to ozone
A11 01  1    @1 FINDLEY (D. A.)
A11 02  1    @1 KEEVER (G. J.)
A11 03  1    @1 CHAPPELKA (A. H.)
A11 04  1    @1 EAKES (D. J.)
A11 05  1    @1 GILLIAM (C. H.)
A14 01      @1 Department of Horticulture and School of Forestry, Auburn University @2 Alabama 36849 @3 USA @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut. @Z 3 aut. @Z 4 aut. @Z 5 aut.
A20       @1 105-111
A21       @1 1997
A23 01      @0 ENG
A43 01      @1 INIST @2 15173 @5 354000078869560120
A44       @0 0000 @1 © 1998 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.
A45       @0 33 ref.
A47 01  1    @0 98-0163666
A60       @1 P
A61       @0 A
A64   1    @0 Environmental pollution : (1987)
A66 01      @0 GBR
C01 01    ENG  @0 Five cultivars of buddleia, Buddleia davidii Franch., were exposed to sub-ambient, ambient, and twice-ambient levels of ozone in open-top chambers for 8 weeks (June-August) during 1995. Plants were evaluated for foliar injury, growth index, and inflorescence characteristics during and following exposure. Destructive harvests were conducted at the end of the exposure period to determine dry weights of both above- and below-ground plant components. All cultivars had symptoms of visible injury in the twice- ambient treatment at both three and eight weeks after exposures began. No visible symptoms were observed at ambient ozone concentrations. At three weeks of exposure, 'Pink Delight' had the highest percentage of the leaves injured (PLI), 46. 2%, followed by 'Opera' with a PLI of 23.3%. The other three cultivars had similar PLls of less than 15%. After eight weeks of exposure, visible injury was equally severe on all cultivars with a mean PLI of 50.2% and mean Horsfall-Barratt rating of 5.4, indicating 12 to 25% of the leaf area was injured. No ozone x cultivar interaction was found for any growth variable measured. Across cultivars, growth index was reduced by 6%, total dry weight by 35%, and the number of developing floral buds and inflorescences by 29% for plants in twice-ambient ozone concentrations compared to ambient ozone concentrations. Percent biomass allocated to inflorescences was significantly greater for plants exposed to sub-ambient levels compared to those exposed to ozone at either ambient or twice-ambient concentrations. Results indicate that ozone levels similar to those in large urban areas in the southeastern United States have the potential to reduce growth and flowering of this important landscape plant.
C02 01  X    @0 002A32D03C
C02 02  X    @0 002A14D05F
C03 01  X  FRE  @0 Ozone @2 NK @2 FX @5 01
C03 01  X  ENG  @0 Ozone @2 NK @2 FX @5 01
C03 01  X  GER  @0 Ozon @2 NK @2 FX @5 01
C03 01  X  SPA  @0 Ozono @2 NK @2 FX @5 01
C03 02  X  FRE  @0 Chambre ciel ouvert @5 02
C03 02  X  ENG  @0 Open top chamber @5 02
C03 02  X  SPA  @0 Cámara cielo abierto @5 02
C03 03  X  FRE  @0 Dégât @5 03
C03 03  X  ENG  @0 Damage @5 03
C03 03  X  SPA  @0 Estrago @5 03
C03 04  X  FRE  @0 Croissance @5 04
C03 04  X  ENG  @0 Growth @5 04
C03 04  X  SPA  @0 Crecimiento @5 04
C03 05  X  FRE  @0 Floraison @5 05
C03 05  X  ENG  @0 Flowering @5 05
C03 05  X  SPA  @0 Floración @5 05
C03 06  X  FRE  @0 Cultivar @5 06
C03 06  X  ENG  @0 Cultivar @5 06
C03 06  X  SPA  @0 Cultivar @5 06
C03 07  X  FRE  @0 Etats Unis @2 NG @5 07
C03 07  X  ENG  @0 United States @2 NG @5 07
C03 07  X  GER  @0 Vereinigte Staaten @2 NG @5 07
C03 07  X  SPA  @0 Estados Unidos @2 NG @5 07
C03 08  X  FRE  @0 Sensibilité résistance @5 08
C03 08  X  ENG  @0 Sensitivity resistance @5 08
C03 08  X  SPA  @0 Sensibilidad resistencia @5 08
C03 09  X  FRE  @0 Biomasse @5 09
C03 09  X  ENG  @0 Biomass @5 09
C03 09  X  SPA  @0 Biomasa @5 09
C03 10  X  FRE  @0 Buddleja davidii @2 NS @4 INC @5 77
C07 01  X  FRE  @0 Amérique du Nord @2 NG
C07 01  X  ENG  @0 North America @2 NG
C07 01  X  GER  @0 Nordamerika @2 NG
C07 01  X  SPA  @0 America del norte @2 NG
C07 02  X  FRE  @0 Amérique @2 NG
C07 02  X  ENG  @0 America @2 NG
C07 02  X  SPA  @0 America @2 NG
C07 03  X  FRE  @0 Polluant @5 33
C07 03  X  ENG  @0 Pollutant @5 33
C07 03  X  SPA  @0 Contaminante @5 33
C07 04  X  FRE  @0 Arbuste ornemental @5 40
C07 04  X  ENG  @0 Ornamental shrub @5 40
C07 04  X  SPA  @0 Arbusto ornamental @5 40
C07 05  X  FRE  @0 Buddlejaceae @2 NS @5 46
C07 05  X  ENG  @0 Buddlejaceae @2 NS @5 46
C07 05  X  SPA  @0 Buddlejaceae @2 NS @5 46
C07 06  X  FRE  @0 Dicotyledones @2 NS
C07 06  X  ENG  @0 Dicotyledones @2 NS
C07 06  X  SPA  @0 Dicotyledones @2 NS
C07 07  X  FRE  @0 Angiospermae @2 NS
C07 07  X  ENG  @0 Angiospermae @2 NS
C07 07  X  SPA  @0 Angiospermae @2 NS
C07 08  X  FRE  @0 Spermatophyta @2 NS
C07 08  X  ENG  @0 Spermatophyta @2 NS
C07 08  X  SPA  @0 Spermatophyta @2 NS
N21       @1 103

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

Pascal:98-0163666

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Differential response of buddleia (Buddleia davidii Franch.) to ozone</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Findley, D A" sort="Findley, D A" uniqKey="Findley D" first="D. A." last="Findley">D. A. Findley</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Horticulture and School of Forestry, Auburn University</s1>
<s2>Alabama 36849</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Keever, G J" sort="Keever, G J" uniqKey="Keever G" first="G. J." last="Keever">G. J. Keever</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Horticulture and School of Forestry, Auburn University</s1>
<s2>Alabama 36849</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Chappelka, A H" sort="Chappelka, A H" uniqKey="Chappelka A" first="A. H." last="Chappelka">A. H. Chappelka</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Horticulture and School of Forestry, Auburn University</s1>
<s2>Alabama 36849</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Eakes, D J" sort="Eakes, D J" uniqKey="Eakes D" first="D. J." last="Eakes">D. J. Eakes</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Horticulture and School of Forestry, Auburn University</s1>
<s2>Alabama 36849</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gilliam, C H" sort="Gilliam, C H" uniqKey="Gilliam C" first="C. H." last="Gilliam">C. H. Gilliam</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Horticulture and School of Forestry, Auburn University</s1>
<s2>Alabama 36849</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">98-0163666</idno>
<date when="1997">1997</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 98-0163666 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:98-0163666</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000866</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Curation">000C04</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Differential response of buddleia (Buddleia davidii Franch.) to ozone</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Findley, D A" sort="Findley, D A" uniqKey="Findley D" first="D. A." last="Findley">D. A. Findley</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Horticulture and School of Forestry, Auburn University</s1>
<s2>Alabama 36849</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Keever, G J" sort="Keever, G J" uniqKey="Keever G" first="G. J." last="Keever">G. J. Keever</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Horticulture and School of Forestry, Auburn University</s1>
<s2>Alabama 36849</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Chappelka, A H" sort="Chappelka, A H" uniqKey="Chappelka A" first="A. H." last="Chappelka">A. H. Chappelka</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Horticulture and School of Forestry, Auburn University</s1>
<s2>Alabama 36849</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Eakes, D J" sort="Eakes, D J" uniqKey="Eakes D" first="D. J." last="Eakes">D. J. Eakes</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Horticulture and School of Forestry, Auburn University</s1>
<s2>Alabama 36849</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gilliam, C H" sort="Gilliam, C H" uniqKey="Gilliam C" first="C. H." last="Gilliam">C. H. Gilliam</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Horticulture and School of Forestry, Auburn University</s1>
<s2>Alabama 36849</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Environmental pollution : (1987)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Environ. pollut. : (1987)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0269-7491</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="1997">1997</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">Environmental pollution : (1987)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Environ. pollut. : (1987)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0269-7491</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Biomass</term>
<term>Cultivar</term>
<term>Damage</term>
<term>Flowering</term>
<term>Growth</term>
<term>Open top chamber</term>
<term>Ozone</term>
<term>Sensitivity resistance</term>
<term>United States</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Ozone</term>
<term>Chambre ciel ouvert</term>
<term>Dégât</term>
<term>Croissance</term>
<term>Floraison</term>
<term>Cultivar</term>
<term>Etats Unis</term>
<term>Sensibilité résistance</term>
<term>Biomasse</term>
<term>Buddleja davidii</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Ozone</term>
<term>Biomasse</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Five cultivars of buddleia, Buddleia davidii Franch., were exposed to sub-ambient, ambient, and twice-ambient levels of ozone in open-top chambers for 8 weeks (June-August) during 1995. Plants were evaluated for foliar injury, growth index, and inflorescence characteristics during and following exposure. Destructive harvests were conducted at the end of the exposure period to determine dry weights of both above- and below-ground plant components. All cultivars had symptoms of visible injury in the twice- ambient treatment at both three and eight weeks after exposures began. No visible symptoms were observed at ambient ozone concentrations. At three weeks of exposure, 'Pink Delight' had the highest percentage of the leaves injured (PLI), 46. 2%, followed by 'Opera' with a PLI of 23.3%. The other three cultivars had similar PLls of less than 15%. After eight weeks of exposure, visible injury was equally severe on all cultivars with a mean PLI of 50.2% and mean Horsfall-Barratt rating of 5.4, indicating 12 to 25% of the leaf area was injured. No ozone x cultivar interaction was found for any growth variable measured. Across cultivars, growth index was reduced by 6%, total dry weight by 35%, and the number of developing floral buds and inflorescences by 29% for plants in twice-ambient ozone concentrations compared to ambient ozone concentrations. Percent biomass allocated to inflorescences was significantly greater for plants exposed to sub-ambient levels compared to those exposed to ozone at either ambient or twice-ambient concentrations. Results indicate that ozone levels similar to those in large urban areas in the southeastern United States have the potential to reduce growth and flowering of this important landscape plant.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>0269-7491</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01">
<s0>ENVPAF</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>Environ. pollut. : (1987)</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>98</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06>
<s2>1</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Differential response of buddleia (Buddleia davidii Franch.) to ozone</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>FINDLEY (D. A.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>KEEVER (G. J.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1">
<s1>CHAPPELKA (A. H.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1">
<s1>EAKES (D. J.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1">
<s1>GILLIAM (C. H.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Horticulture and School of Forestry, Auburn University</s1>
<s2>Alabama 36849</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20>
<s1>105-111</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>1997</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>15173</s2>
<s5>354000078869560120</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 1998 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>33 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>98-0163666</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i2="1">
<s0>Environmental pollution : (1987)</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>GBR</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>Five cultivars of buddleia, Buddleia davidii Franch., were exposed to sub-ambient, ambient, and twice-ambient levels of ozone in open-top chambers for 8 weeks (June-August) during 1995. Plants were evaluated for foliar injury, growth index, and inflorescence characteristics during and following exposure. Destructive harvests were conducted at the end of the exposure period to determine dry weights of both above- and below-ground plant components. All cultivars had symptoms of visible injury in the twice- ambient treatment at both three and eight weeks after exposures began. No visible symptoms were observed at ambient ozone concentrations. At three weeks of exposure, 'Pink Delight' had the highest percentage of the leaves injured (PLI), 46. 2%, followed by 'Opera' with a PLI of 23.3%. The other three cultivars had similar PLls of less than 15%. After eight weeks of exposure, visible injury was equally severe on all cultivars with a mean PLI of 50.2% and mean Horsfall-Barratt rating of 5.4, indicating 12 to 25% of the leaf area was injured. No ozone x cultivar interaction was found for any growth variable measured. Across cultivars, growth index was reduced by 6%, total dry weight by 35%, and the number of developing floral buds and inflorescences by 29% for plants in twice-ambient ozone concentrations compared to ambient ozone concentrations. Percent biomass allocated to inflorescences was significantly greater for plants exposed to sub-ambient levels compared to those exposed to ozone at either ambient or twice-ambient concentrations. Results indicate that ozone levels similar to those in large urban areas in the southeastern United States have the potential to reduce growth and flowering of this important landscape plant.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X">
<s0>002A32D03C</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X">
<s0>002A14D05F</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Ozone</s0>
<s2>NK</s2>
<s2>FX</s2>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Ozone</s0>
<s2>NK</s2>
<s2>FX</s2>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="GER">
<s0>Ozon</s0>
<s2>NK</s2>
<s2>FX</s2>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Ozono</s0>
<s2>NK</s2>
<s2>FX</s2>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Chambre ciel ouvert</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Open top chamber</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Cámara cielo abierto</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Dégât</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Damage</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Estrago</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Croissance</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Growth</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Crecimiento</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Floraison</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Flowering</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Floración</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Cultivar</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Cultivar</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Cultivar</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Etats Unis</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>United States</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="GER">
<s0>Vereinigte Staaten</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Estados Unidos</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Sensibilité résistance</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Sensitivity resistance</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Sensibilidad resistencia</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Biomasse</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Biomass</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Biomasa</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Buddleja davidii</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>77</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Amérique du Nord</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>North America</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="GER">
<s0>Nordamerika</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>America del norte</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Amérique</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>America</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>America</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Polluant</s0>
<s5>33</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Pollutant</s0>
<s5>33</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Contaminante</s0>
<s5>33</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Arbuste ornemental</s0>
<s5>40</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Ornamental shrub</s0>
<s5>40</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Arbusto ornamental</s0>
<s5>40</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Buddlejaceae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>46</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Buddlejaceae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>46</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Buddlejaceae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
<s5>46</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Dicotyledones</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Dicotyledones</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Dicotyledones</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Angiospermae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Angiospermae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Angiospermae</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Spermatophyta</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Spermatophyta</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Spermatophyta</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fN21>
<s1>103</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/OperaV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000C04 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000C04 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Musique
   |area=    OperaV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:98-0163666
   |texte=   Differential response of buddleia (Buddleia davidii Franch.) to ozone
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.21.
Data generation: Thu Apr 14 14:59:05 2016. Site generation: Thu Jan 4 23:09:23 2024