Are People Better at Recognizing Ambivalent Sexism on the Basis of the Non-standard Profiles than the Standard ASI Ones?
Identifieur interne : 000081 ( PascalFrancis/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000080; suivant : 000082Are People Better at Recognizing Ambivalent Sexism on the Basis of the Non-standard Profiles than the Standard ASI Ones?
Auteurs : Tadios Chisango [Afrique du Sud] ; Gwatirera Javangwe [Zimbabwe]Source :
- Sex roles [ 0360-0025 ] ; 2012.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
- Wicri :
- topic : Homme.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Kilianski and Rudman (1998) developed "standard" profiles of a benevolent and a hostile sexist man from the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (ASI) and tested if a U.S. sample of female students would perceive them as referring to the same person (i.e. an ambivalent sexist). Results showed that although they appraised the benevolent sexist profile favourably, and the hostile sexist one unfavourably, they considered it unlikely that they could refer to the same man. We developed "non-standard" profiles similar to those used by Kilianski and Rudman, with the major difference that they were not made directly from the ASI, but on the basis of attitudes and actions of a realistic soap-opera character, and tested if they would be considered as referring to the same individual by a sample of 238 undergraduate students (81 males and 157 females) at the University of Zimbabwe. Our results showed that both male and female participants found it as difficult to detect ambivalent sexism on the basis of non-standard ASI profiles as on the basis of standard ASI profiles.
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PascalFrancis, to step Corpus: 000082
- to stream PascalFrancis, to step Corpus: 000120
- to stream PascalFrancis, to step Curation: 000454
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:12-0339989Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Are People Better at Recognizing Ambivalent Sexism on the Basis of the Non-standard Profiles than the Standard ASI Ones?</title><author><name sortKey="Chisango, Tadios" sort="Chisango, Tadios" uniqKey="Chisango T" first="Tadios" last="Chisango">Tadios Chisango</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>School of Community and Human Development, Wits University, Umthombo Building, East Campus, Pvt Bag 3, Wits 2050</s1><s2>Johannesburg</s2><s3>ZAF</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Afrique du Sud</country><wicri:noRegion>Johannesburg</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Javangwe, Gwatirera" sort="Javangwe, Gwatirera" uniqKey="Javangwe G" first="Gwatirera" last="Javangwe">Gwatirera Javangwe</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Psychology, University of Zimbabwe, Mt Pleasant, P.O.Box MP 167</s1><s2>Harare</s2><s3>ZWE</s3><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Zimbabwe</country><wicri:noRegion>Harare</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno><idno type="inist">12-0339989</idno><date when="2012">2012</date><idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 12-0339989 INIST</idno><idno type="RBID">Pascal:12-0339989</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000082</idno><idno type="stanalyst">FRANCIS 12-0339989 INIST</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000120</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Curation">000454</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Checkpoint">000081</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Are People Better at Recognizing Ambivalent Sexism on the Basis of the Non-standard Profiles than the Standard ASI Ones?</title><author><name sortKey="Chisango, Tadios" sort="Chisango, Tadios" uniqKey="Chisango T" first="Tadios" last="Chisango">Tadios Chisango</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>School of Community and Human Development, Wits University, Umthombo Building, East Campus, Pvt Bag 3, Wits 2050</s1><s2>Johannesburg</s2><s3>ZAF</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Afrique du Sud</country><wicri:noRegion>Johannesburg</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Javangwe, Gwatirera" sort="Javangwe, Gwatirera" uniqKey="Javangwe G" first="Gwatirera" last="Javangwe">Gwatirera Javangwe</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Psychology, University of Zimbabwe, Mt Pleasant, P.O.Box MP 167</s1><s2>Harare</s2><s3>ZWE</s3><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Zimbabwe</country><wicri:noRegion>Harare</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j" type="main">Sex roles</title><title level="j" type="abbreviated">Sex roles</title><idno type="ISSN">0360-0025</idno><imprint><date when="2012">2012</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Sex roles</title><title level="j" type="abbreviated">Sex roles</title><idno type="ISSN">0360-0025</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Ambivalence</term><term>Cultural environment</term><term>Hostility</term><term>Human</term><term>Sex role</term><term>Sexism</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Ambivalence</term><term>Sexisme</term><term>Hostilité</term><term>Milieu culturel</term><term>Rôle sexuel</term><term>Homme</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Homme</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Kilianski and Rudman (1998) developed "standard" profiles of a benevolent and a hostile sexist man from the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (ASI) and tested if a U.S. sample of female students would perceive them as referring to the same person (i.e. an ambivalent sexist). Results showed that although they appraised the benevolent sexist profile favourably, and the hostile sexist one unfavourably, they considered it unlikely that they could refer to the same man. We developed "non-standard" profiles similar to those used by Kilianski and Rudman, with the major difference that they were not made directly from the ASI, but on the basis of attitudes and actions of a realistic soap-opera character, and tested if they would be considered as referring to the same individual by a sample of 238 undergraduate students (81 males and 157 females) at the University of Zimbabwe. Our results showed that both male and female participants found it as difficult to detect ambivalent sexism on the basis of non-standard ASI profiles as on the basis of standard ASI profiles.</div></front></TEI><inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0360-0025</s0></fA01><fA03 i2="1"><s0>Sex roles</s0></fA03><fA05><s2>67</s2></fA05><fA06><s2>1-2</s2></fA06><fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Are People Better at Recognizing Ambivalent Sexism on the Basis of the Non-standard Profiles than the Standard ASI Ones?</s1></fA08><fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>CHISANGO (Tadios)</s1></fA11><fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>JAVANGWE (Gwatirera)</s1></fA11><fA14 i1="01"><s1>School of Community and Human Development, Wits University, Umthombo Building, East Campus, Pvt Bag 3, Wits 2050</s1><s2>Johannesburg</s2><s3>ZAF</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ></fA14><fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Psychology, University of Zimbabwe, Mt Pleasant, P.O.Box MP 167</s1><s2>Harare</s2><s3>ZWE</s3><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></fA14><fA20><s1>69-82</s1></fA20><fA21><s1>2012</s1></fA21><fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0></fA23><fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1><s2>15762</s2><s5>354000500812990060</s5></fA43><fA44><s0>0000</s0><s1>© 2012 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1></fA44><fA45><s0>3/4 p.</s0></fA45><fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>12-0339989</s0></fA47><fA60><s1>P</s1></fA60><fA61><s0>A</s0></fA61><fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Sex roles</s0></fA64><fA66 i1="01"><s0>DEU</s0></fA66><fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Kilianski and Rudman (1998) developed "standard" profiles of a benevolent and a hostile sexist man from the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (ASI) and tested if a U.S. sample of female students would perceive them as referring to the same person (i.e. an ambivalent sexist). Results showed that although they appraised the benevolent sexist profile favourably, and the hostile sexist one unfavourably, they considered it unlikely that they could refer to the same man. We developed "non-standard" profiles similar to those used by Kilianski and Rudman, with the major difference that they were not made directly from the ASI, but on the basis of attitudes and actions of a realistic soap-opera character, and tested if they would be considered as referring to the same individual by a sample of 238 undergraduate students (81 males and 157 females) at the University of Zimbabwe. Our results showed that both male and female participants found it as difficult to detect ambivalent sexism on the basis of non-standard ASI profiles as on the basis of standard ASI profiles.</s0></fC01><fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002A26M08</s0></fC02><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Ambivalence</s0><s5>01</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Ambivalence</s0><s5>01</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Ambivalencia</s0><s5>01</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Sexisme</s0><s5>02</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Sexism</s0><s5>02</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Sexismo</s0><s5>02</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Hostilité</s0><s5>03</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Hostility</s0><s5>03</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hostilidad</s0><s5>03</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Milieu culturel</s0><s5>04</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Cultural environment</s0><s5>04</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Contexto cultural</s0><s5>04</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Rôle sexuel</s0><s5>05</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Sex role</s0><s5>05</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Rol sexual</s0><s5>05</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0><s5>18</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0><s5>18</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0><s5>18</s5></fC03><fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Environnement social</s0><s5>37</s5></fC07><fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Social environment</s0><s5>37</s5></fC07><fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Contexto social</s0><s5>37</s5></fC07><fN21><s1>261</s1></fN21></pA></standard></inist><affiliations><list><country><li>Afrique du Sud</li><li>Zimbabwe</li></country></list><tree><country name="Afrique du Sud"><noRegion><name sortKey="Chisango, Tadios" sort="Chisango, Tadios" uniqKey="Chisango T" first="Tadios" last="Chisango">Tadios Chisango</name></noRegion></country><country name="Zimbabwe"><noRegion><name sortKey="Javangwe, Gwatirera" sort="Javangwe, Gwatirera" uniqKey="Javangwe G" first="Gwatirera" last="Javangwe">Gwatirera Javangwe</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/OperaV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000081 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000081 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Musique
|area= OperaV1
|flux= PascalFrancis
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= Pascal:12-0339989
|texte= Are People Better at Recognizing Ambivalent Sexism on the Basis of the Non-standard Profiles than the Standard ASI Ones?
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.21. |  |