Mozart Among the Theologians
Identifieur interne : 000009 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000008; suivant : 000010Mozart Among the Theologians
Auteurs : David J. GouwensSource :
- Modern Theology [ 0266-7177 ] ; 2000-10.
Abstract
The essay compares and contrasts the philosophical, theological, and aesthetic approaches to Mozart in the writings of Søren Kierkegaard's aesthete A (Either/Or, I), Karl Barth (primarily Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart), and Hans Küng (Mozart: Traces of Transcendence). Whereas Kierkegaard's A outlines a non‐religious ‘daemonic Mozart’, Barth and Küng depict two contrasting theological understandings of Mozart's music. Barth's Mozart reflects a Reformed aesthetic, with Mozart as a ‘parable’ of gospel, whereas Küng's Mozart reflects a Roman Catholic ‘sacramental’ vision of music and religious faith. The essay explores how these different visions of Mozart are shaped by both their theological and aesthetic commitments.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/1468-0025.00141
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:A4246B62C0A78B4A75EB86CE88961B2631CBBA42Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Mozart Among the Theologians</title><author><name sortKey="Gouwens, David J" sort="Gouwens, David J" uniqKey="Gouwens D" first="David J." last="Gouwens">David J. Gouwens</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Associate Professor of Theology, Brite Divinity School, Texas Christian University, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:A4246B62C0A78B4A75EB86CE88961B2631CBBA42</idno><date when="2000" year="2000">2000</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/1468-0025.00141</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/A4246B62C0A78B4A75EB86CE88961B2631CBBA42/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000009</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Mozart Among the Theologians</title><author><name sortKey="Gouwens, David J" sort="Gouwens, David J" uniqKey="Gouwens D" first="David J." last="Gouwens">David J. Gouwens</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Associate Professor of Theology, Brite Divinity School, Texas Christian University, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Modern Theology</title><idno type="ISSN">0266-7177</idno><idno type="eISSN">1468-0025</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2000-10">2000-10</date><biblScope unit="volume">16</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="461">461</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="474">474</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0266-7177</idno></series><idno type="istex">A4246B62C0A78B4A75EB86CE88961B2631CBBA42</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/1468-0025.00141</idno><idno type="ArticleID">MOTH141</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0266-7177</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The essay compares and contrasts the philosophical, theological, and aesthetic approaches to Mozart in the writings of Søren Kierkegaard's aesthete A (Either/Or, I), Karl Barth (primarily Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart), and Hans Küng (Mozart: Traces of Transcendence). Whereas Kierkegaard's A outlines a non‐religious ‘daemonic Mozart’, Barth and Küng depict two contrasting theological understandings of Mozart's music. Barth's Mozart reflects a Reformed aesthetic, with Mozart as a ‘parable’ of gospel, whereas Küng's Mozart reflects a Roman Catholic ‘sacramental’ vision of music and religious faith. The essay explores how these different visions of Mozart are shaped by both their theological and aesthetic commitments.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>David J. Gouwens</name><affiliations><json:string>Associate Professor of Theology, Brite Divinity School, Texas Christian University, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><abstract>The essay compares and contrasts the philosophical, theological, and aesthetic approaches to Mozart in the writings of Søren Kierkegaard's aesthete A (Either/Or, I), Karl Barth (primarily Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart), and Hans Küng (Mozart: Traces of Transcendence). Whereas Kierkegaard's A outlines a non‐religious ‘daemonic Mozart’, Barth and Küng depict two contrasting theological understandings of Mozart's music. Barth's Mozart reflects a Reformed aesthetic, with Mozart as a ‘parable’ of gospel, whereas Küng's Mozart reflects a Roman Catholic ‘sacramental’ vision of music and religious faith. The essay explores how these different visions of Mozart are shaped by both their theological and aesthetic commitments.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.2</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>429 x 649 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><keywordCount>0</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>718</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>6196</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>36784</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>14</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>100</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Mozart Among the Theologians</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>16</volume><pages><total>14</total><last>474</last><first>461</first></pages><issn><json:string>0266-7177</json:string></issn><issue>4</issue><genre></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1468-0025</json:string></eissn><title>Modern Theology</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1468-0025</json:string></doi></host><publicationDate>2000</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2000</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/1468-0025.00141</json:string></doi><id>A4246B62C0A78B4A75EB86CE88961B2631CBBA42</id><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A4246B62C0A78B4A75EB86CE88961B2631CBBA42/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><extension>zip</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A4246B62C0A78B4A75EB86CE88961B2631CBBA42/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/A4246B62C0A78B4A75EB86CE88961B2631CBBA42/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Mozart Among the Theologians</title><respStmt xml:id="ISTEX-API" resp="Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID" name="ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)"></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</pubPlace><availability><p>WILEY</p></availability><date>2000</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content">*I encountered Jaroslav Pelikan's Bach Among the Theologians (Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press, 1986) only after choosing the title for this paper. Pelikan's book similarly considers the problems involved in a theological assessment of music, especially the tension between the ‘sacred” and ‘secular’ Bach.</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Mozart Among the Theologians</title><author><persName><forename type="first">David J.</forename><surname>Gouwens</surname></persName><affiliation>Associate Professor of Theology, Brite Divinity School, Texas Christian University, USA</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Modern Theology</title><idno type="pISSN">0266-7177</idno><idno type="eISSN">1468-0025</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1468-0025</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2000-10"></date><biblScope unit="volume">16</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="461">461</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="474">474</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">A4246B62C0A78B4A75EB86CE88961B2631CBBA42</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/1468-0025.00141</idno><idno type="ArticleID">MOTH141</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2000</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The essay compares and contrasts the philosophical, theological, and aesthetic approaches to Mozart in the writings of Søren Kierkegaard's aesthete A (Either/Or, I), Karl Barth (primarily Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart), and Hans Küng (Mozart: Traces of Transcendence). Whereas Kierkegaard's A outlines a non‐religious ‘daemonic Mozart’, Barth and Küng depict two contrasting theological understandings of Mozart's music. Barth's Mozart reflects a Reformed aesthetic, with Mozart as a ‘parable’ of gospel, whereas Küng's Mozart reflects a Roman Catholic ‘sacramental’ vision of music and religious faith. The essay explores how these different visions of Mozart are shaped by both their theological and aesthetic commitments.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2000-10">Published</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2016-1-4">References added</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A4246B62C0A78B4A75EB86CE88961B2631CBBA42/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1468-0025</doi><issn type="print">0266-7177</issn><issn type="electronic">1468-0025</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="MOTH"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="MODERN THEOLOGY">Modern Theology</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="10004"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/moth.2000.16.issue-4</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="16">16</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="4">4</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2000-10">October 2000</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0046100" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/1468-0025.00141</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="MOTH141"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="14"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright>Blackwell Publishers Ltd 2000</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2002-12-17"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2002-12-17"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:Header result:Header" date="2010-03-04"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-02-03"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-31"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="461">461</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="474">474</numbering></numberingGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:MOTH.MOTH141.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Mozart Among the Theologians<link href="#fn1"></link></title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>David J.</givenNames><familyName>Gouwens</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="US"><unparsedAffiliation>Associate Professor of Theology, Brite Divinity School, Texas Christian University, USA</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>The essay compares and contrasts the philosophical, theological, and aesthetic approaches to Mozart in the writings of Søren Kierkegaard's aesthete A (<i>Either/Or</i>, I), Karl Barth (primarily <i>Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart</i>), and Hans Küng (<i>Mozart: Traces of Transcendence</i>). Whereas Kierkegaard's A outlines a non‐religious ‘daemonic Mozart’, Barth and Küng depict two contrasting theological understandings of Mozart's music. Barth's Mozart reflects a Reformed aesthetic, with Mozart as a ‘parable’ of gospel, whereas Küng's Mozart reflects a Roman Catholic ‘sacramental’ vision of music and religious faith. The essay explores how these different visions of Mozart are shaped by both their theological and aesthetic commitments.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Mozart Among the Theologians</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Mozart Among the Theologians</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">David J.</namePart><namePart type="family">Gouwens</namePart><affiliation>Associate Professor of Theology, Brite Divinity School, Texas Christian University, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-10</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2000</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">The essay compares and contrasts the philosophical, theological, and aesthetic approaches to Mozart in the writings of Søren Kierkegaard's aesthete A (Either/Or, I), Karl Barth (primarily Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart), and Hans Küng (Mozart: Traces of Transcendence). Whereas Kierkegaard's A outlines a non‐religious ‘daemonic Mozart’, Barth and Küng depict two contrasting theological understandings of Mozart's music. Barth's Mozart reflects a Reformed aesthetic, with Mozart as a ‘parable’ of gospel, whereas Küng's Mozart reflects a Roman Catholic ‘sacramental’ vision of music and religious faith. The essay explores how these different visions of Mozart are shaped by both their theological and aesthetic commitments.</abstract><note type="content">*I encountered Jaroslav Pelikan's Bach Among the Theologians (Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press, 1986) only after choosing the title for this paper. Pelikan's book similarly considers the problems involved in a theological assessment of music, especially the tension between the ‘sacred” and ‘secular’ Bach.</note><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Modern Theology</title></titleInfo><identifier type="ISSN">0266-7177</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1468-0025</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1468-0025</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">MOTH</identifier><part><date>2000</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>16</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>4</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>461</start><end>474</end><total>14</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">A4246B62C0A78B4A75EB86CE88961B2631CBBA42</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/1468-0025.00141</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">MOTH141</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Blackwell Publishers Ltd 2000</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</recordOrigin><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/MozartV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000009 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000009 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Musique
|area= MozartV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:A4246B62C0A78B4A75EB86CE88961B2631CBBA42
|texte= Mozart Among the Theologians
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.20. |  |