Bat diversity and abundance associated with the degree of secondary succession in a tropical forest mosaic in south‐eastern Mexico
Identifieur interne : 000997 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000996; suivant : 000998Bat diversity and abundance associated with the degree of secondary succession in a tropical forest mosaic in south‐eastern Mexico
Auteurs : A. A. Castro-Luna ; V. J. Sosa ; G. Castillo-CamposSource :
- Animal Conservation [ 1367-9430 ] ; 2007-05.
English descriptors
Abstract
Under the hypothesis that bat diversity would be lower in the early stages of secondary succession and that species affected negatively by habitat modification would be more frequent in later successional stages, we evaluated how bats use 12 vegetation stands representing four stages of secondary succession, following disturbance caused by slash‐and‐burn agriculture and selective logging. We compared bat richness, abundance and diversity, and found that none of these variables was different among stages or rainy seasons. However, of the 10 most common bat species, two were significantly more abundant in stands at the early stages of secondary succession, while the opposite was true for three other species. Canopy cover mainly explains these patterns. Rainy season had no effect on the abundance of the common species. The results of this study indicate that although some frugivorous species were very abundant in the younger stands, the majority of the rare species were captured in older stands. The absence of rare and habitat‐specialized species from young successional stages close to primary forest suggests that, for effective bat conservation in landscapes modified by human activity, areas with original vegetation should be maintained to ensure the survivorship of sensitive‐to‐deforestation species.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2007.00097.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:61B4847EF723AC305D23B5DC8FC88DDF64886F93Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Bat diversity and abundance associated with the degree of secondary succession in a tropical forest mosaic in south‐eastern Mexico</title><author><name sortKey="Castro Una, A A" sort="Castro Una, A A" uniqKey="Castro Una A" first="A. A." last="Castro-Luna">A. A. Castro-Luna</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sosa, V J" sort="Sosa, V J" uniqKey="Sosa V" first="V. J." last="Sosa">V. J. Sosa</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Castillo Ampos, G" sort="Castillo Ampos, G" uniqKey="Castillo Ampos G" first="G." last="Castillo-Campos">G. Castillo-Campos</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:61B4847EF723AC305D23B5DC8FC88DDF64886F93</idno><date when="2007" year="2007">2007</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-1795.2007.00097.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/61B4847EF723AC305D23B5DC8FC88DDF64886F93/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000997</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000997</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Bat diversity and abundance associated with the degree of secondary succession in a tropical forest mosaic in south‐eastern Mexico</title><author><name sortKey="Castro Una, A A" sort="Castro Una, A A" uniqKey="Castro Una A" first="A. A." last="Castro-Luna">A. A. Castro-Luna</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sosa, V J" sort="Sosa, V J" uniqKey="Sosa V" first="V. J." last="Sosa">V. J. Sosa</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Castillo Ampos, G" sort="Castillo Ampos, G" uniqKey="Castillo Ampos G" first="G." last="Castillo-Campos">G. Castillo-Campos</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Animal Conservation</title><idno type="ISSN">1367-9430</idno><idno type="eISSN">1469-1795</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-05">2007-05</date><biblScope unit="volume">10</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="219">219</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="228">228</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1367-9430</idno></series><idno type="istex">61B4847EF723AC305D23B5DC8FC88DDF64886F93</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1469-1795.2007.00097.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">ACV97</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1367-9430</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>bats</term><term>canopy cover</term><term>secondary succession</term><term>selective logging</term><term>slash‐and‐burn</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Under the hypothesis that bat diversity would be lower in the early stages of secondary succession and that species affected negatively by habitat modification would be more frequent in later successional stages, we evaluated how bats use 12 vegetation stands representing four stages of secondary succession, following disturbance caused by slash‐and‐burn agriculture and selective logging. We compared bat richness, abundance and diversity, and found that none of these variables was different among stages or rainy seasons. However, of the 10 most common bat species, two were significantly more abundant in stands at the early stages of secondary succession, while the opposite was true for three other species. Canopy cover mainly explains these patterns. Rainy season had no effect on the abundance of the common species. The results of this study indicate that although some frugivorous species were very abundant in the younger stands, the majority of the rare species were captured in older stands. The absence of rare and habitat‐specialized species from young successional stages close to primary forest suggests that, for effective bat conservation in landscapes modified by human activity, areas with original vegetation should be maintained to ensure the survivorship of sensitive‐to‐deforestation species.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>A. A. Castro‐Luna</name><affiliations><json:string>Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>V. J. Sosa</name><affiliations><json:string>Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>G. Castillo‐Campos</name><affiliations><json:string>Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>bats</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>canopy cover</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>secondary succession</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>selective logging</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>slash‐and‐burn</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>ACV97</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Under the hypothesis that bat diversity would be lower in the early stages of secondary succession and that species affected negatively by habitat modification would be more frequent in later successional stages, we evaluated how bats use 12 vegetation stands representing four stages of secondary succession, following disturbance caused by slash‐and‐burn agriculture and selective logging. We compared bat richness, abundance and diversity, and found that none of these variables was different among stages or rainy seasons. However, of the 10 most common bat species, two were significantly more abundant in stands at the early stages of secondary succession, while the opposite was true for three other species. Canopy cover mainly explains these patterns. Rainy season had no effect on the abundance of the common species. The results of this study indicate that although some frugivorous species were very abundant in the younger stands, the majority of the rare species were captured in older stands. The absence of rare and habitat‐specialized species from young successional stages close to primary forest suggests that, for effective bat conservation in landscapes modified by human activity, areas with original vegetation should be maintained to ensure the survivorship of sensitive‐to‐deforestation species.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.34</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>1320</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>5719</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>38284</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>10</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>195</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Bat diversity and abundance associated with the degree of secondary succession in a tropical forest mosaic in south‐eastern Mexico</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>10</volume><publisherId><json:string>ACV</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>10</total><last>228</last><first>219</first></pages><issn><json:string>1367-9430</json:string></issn><issue>2</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1469-1795</json:string></eissn><title>Animal Conservation</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1469-1795</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>science</json:string><json:string>ecology</json:string><json:string>biodiversity conservation</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>natural sciences</json:string><json:string>biology</json:string><json:string>ecology</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2007</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2007</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1469-1795.2007.00097.x</json:string></doi><id>61B4847EF723AC305D23B5DC8FC88DDF64886F93</id><score>0.04042069</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/61B4847EF723AC305D23B5DC8FC88DDF64886F93/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/61B4847EF723AC305D23B5DC8FC88DDF64886F93/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/61B4847EF723AC305D23B5DC8FC88DDF64886F93/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Bat diversity and abundance associated with the degree of secondary succession in a tropical forest mosaic in south‐eastern Mexico</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>WILEY</p></availability><date>2007</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Bat diversity and abundance associated with the degree of secondary succession in a tropical forest mosaic in south‐eastern Mexico</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">A. A.</forename><surname>Castro‐Luna</surname></persName><affiliation>Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">V. J.</forename><surname>Sosa</surname></persName><affiliation>Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-3"><persName><forename type="first">G.</forename><surname>Castillo‐Campos</surname></persName><affiliation>Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Animal Conservation</title><idno type="pISSN">1367-9430</idno><idno type="eISSN">1469-1795</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1469-1795</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-05"></date><biblScope unit="volume">10</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="219">219</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="228">228</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">61B4847EF723AC305D23B5DC8FC88DDF64886F93</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1469-1795.2007.00097.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">ACV97</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2007</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Under the hypothesis that bat diversity would be lower in the early stages of secondary succession and that species affected negatively by habitat modification would be more frequent in later successional stages, we evaluated how bats use 12 vegetation stands representing four stages of secondary succession, following disturbance caused by slash‐and‐burn agriculture and selective logging. We compared bat richness, abundance and diversity, and found that none of these variables was different among stages or rainy seasons. However, of the 10 most common bat species, two were significantly more abundant in stands at the early stages of secondary succession, while the opposite was true for three other species. Canopy cover mainly explains these patterns. Rainy season had no effect on the abundance of the common species. The results of this study indicate that although some frugivorous species were very abundant in the younger stands, the majority of the rare species were captured in older stands. The absence of rare and habitat‐specialized species from young successional stages close to primary forest suggests that, for effective bat conservation in landscapes modified by human activity, areas with original vegetation should be maintained to ensure the survivorship of sensitive‐to‐deforestation species.</p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>keywords</head><item><term>bats</term></item><item><term>canopy cover</term></item><item><term>secondary succession</term></item><item><term>selective logging</term></item><item><term>slash‐and‐burn</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2007-05">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/61B4847EF723AC305D23B5DC8FC88DDF64886F93/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1469-1795</doi><issn type="print">1367-9430</issn><issn type="electronic">1469-1795</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="ACV"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="ANIMAL CONSERVATION">Animal Conservation</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="05002"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/acv.2007.10.issue-2</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="10">10</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="2">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2007-05">May 2007</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="15" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1469-1795.2007.00097.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="ACV97"></id><id type="supplier" value="97"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="10"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2007-04-20"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2007-04-20"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-03"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2013-12-31"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-14"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="219">219</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="228">228</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><b>Correspondence</b>
Vinicio J. Sosa, Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Apartado Postal 63, Xalapa, Veracruz 91000, Mexico.
Email: <email normalForm="vinicio.sosa@inecol.edu.mx">vinicio.sosa@inecol.edu.mx</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:ACV.ACV97.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Received 3 April 2006; accepted 19 December 2006</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="3"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="4"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="61"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="7966"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="58"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Bat diversity and abundance associated with the degree of secondary succession in a tropical forest mosaic in south‐eastern Mexico</title><title type="shortAuthors">A. A. Castro‐Luna, V. J. Sosa and G. Castillo‐Campos</title><title type="short">Bats associated with secondary succession</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>A. A.</givenNames><familyName>Castro‐Luna</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>V. J.</givenNames><familyName>Sosa</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>G.</givenNames><familyName>Castillo‐Campos</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="MX"><unparsedAffiliation>Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">bats</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">canopy cover</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">secondary succession</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">selective logging</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">slash‐and‐burn</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p>Under the hypothesis that bat diversity would be lower in the early stages of secondary succession and that species affected negatively by habitat modification would be more frequent in later successional stages, we evaluated how bats use 12 vegetation stands representing four stages of secondary succession, following disturbance caused by slash‐and‐burn agriculture and selective logging. We compared bat richness, abundance and diversity, and found that none of these variables was different among stages or rainy seasons. However, of the 10 most common bat species, two were significantly more abundant in stands at the early stages of secondary succession, while the opposite was true for three other species. Canopy cover mainly explains these patterns. Rainy season had no effect on the abundance of the common species. The results of this study indicate that although some frugivorous species were very abundant in the younger stands, the majority of the rare species were captured in older stands. The absence of rare and habitat‐specialized species from young successional stages close to primary forest suggests that, for effective bat conservation in landscapes modified by human activity, areas with original vegetation should be maintained to ensure the survivorship of sensitive‐to‐deforestation species.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Bat diversity and abundance associated with the degree of secondary succession in a tropical forest mosaic in south‐eastern Mexico</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Bats associated with secondary succession</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Bat diversity and abundance associated with the degree of secondary succession in a tropical forest mosaic in south‐eastern Mexico</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">A. A.</namePart><namePart type="family">Castro‐Luna</namePart><affiliation>Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">V. J.</namePart><namePart type="family">Sosa</namePart><affiliation>Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">G.</namePart><namePart type="family">Castillo‐Campos</namePart><affiliation>Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2007-05</dateIssued><edition>Received 3 April 2006; accepted 19 December 2006</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2007</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="figures">3</extent><extent unit="tables">4</extent><extent unit="references">61</extent><extent unit="words">7966</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Under the hypothesis that bat diversity would be lower in the early stages of secondary succession and that species affected negatively by habitat modification would be more frequent in later successional stages, we evaluated how bats use 12 vegetation stands representing four stages of secondary succession, following disturbance caused by slash‐and‐burn agriculture and selective logging. We compared bat richness, abundance and diversity, and found that none of these variables was different among stages or rainy seasons. However, of the 10 most common bat species, two were significantly more abundant in stands at the early stages of secondary succession, while the opposite was true for three other species. Canopy cover mainly explains these patterns. Rainy season had no effect on the abundance of the common species. The results of this study indicate that although some frugivorous species were very abundant in the younger stands, the majority of the rare species were captured in older stands. The absence of rare and habitat‐specialized species from young successional stages close to primary forest suggests that, for effective bat conservation in landscapes modified by human activity, areas with original vegetation should be maintained to ensure the survivorship of sensitive‐to‐deforestation species.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>bats</topic><topic>canopy cover</topic><topic>secondary succession</topic><topic>selective logging</topic><topic>slash‐and‐burn</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Animal Conservation</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1367-9430</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1469-1795</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1469-1795</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">ACV</identifier><part><date>2007</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>10</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>219</start><end>228</end><total>10</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">61B4847EF723AC305D23B5DC8FC88DDF64886F93</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1469-1795.2007.00097.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">ACV97</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Agronomie/explor/SisAgriV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000997 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000997 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Agronomie
|area= SisAgriV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:61B4847EF723AC305D23B5DC8FC88DDF64886F93
|texte= Bat diversity and abundance associated with the degree of secondary succession in a tropical forest mosaic in south‐eastern Mexico
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.28. |  |