Comparison of habitat-isolation parameters in relation to fragmented distribution patterns in the tree frog ( Hyla arborea )
Identifieur interne : 000744 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000743; suivant : 000745Comparison of habitat-isolation parameters in relation to fragmented distribution patterns in the tree frog ( Hyla arborea )
Auteurs : Claire C. Vos ; Anton H. P. StumpelSource :
- Landscape Ecology [ 0921-2973 ] ; 1996-08-01.
Abstract
Abstract: The distribution pattern of the tree frog (Hyla arborea) in an intensively used agricultural landscape in Zealand Flanders, was analyzed for effects of habitat fragmentation. The logistic regression models showed that the chance that a pond (potential reproduction site) was occupied by tree frogs depended on three isolation factors. The density of ponds within 750 m of the occupied pond was higher compared to ponds that remained unoccupied during the survey period. Additionally both the density of shrubs as well as the density of high herbs, two terrestrial habitat factors, was higher within 1000 m of occupied ponds. The explanatory value of two different types of isolation measures was compared with logistic regression analysis. It is discussed that ‘Concentric isolation measures’, which take size and distance of potential habitat patches in all directions into account, are expected to give a better description of isolation than the more often used 'distance from the nearest habitat patch'.
Url:
DOI: 10.1007/BF02071811
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:50CFA24CE052E1FB086FBF79BE888A9C46AA481BLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Comparison of habitat-isolation parameters in relation to fragmented distribution patterns in the tree frog ( Hyla arborea )</title><author><name sortKey="Vos, Claire C" sort="Vos, Claire C" uniqKey="Vos C" first="Claire C." last="Vos">Claire C. Vos</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute for Forestry and Nature Research, Postbus 23, NL-6700, AA Wageningen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Stumpel, Anton H P" sort="Stumpel, Anton H P" uniqKey="Stumpel A" first="Anton H. P." last="Stumpel">Anton H. P. Stumpel</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute for Forestry and Nature Research, Postbus 23, NL-6700, AA Wageningen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:50CFA24CE052E1FB086FBF79BE888A9C46AA481B</idno><date when="1996" year="1996">1996</date><idno type="doi">10.1007/BF02071811</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/50CFA24CE052E1FB086FBF79BE888A9C46AA481B/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000744</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000744</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Comparison of habitat-isolation parameters in relation to fragmented distribution patterns in the tree frog ( Hyla arborea )</title><author><name sortKey="Vos, Claire C" sort="Vos, Claire C" uniqKey="Vos C" first="Claire C." last="Vos">Claire C. Vos</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute for Forestry and Nature Research, Postbus 23, NL-6700, AA Wageningen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Stumpel, Anton H P" sort="Stumpel, Anton H P" uniqKey="Stumpel A" first="Anton H. P." last="Stumpel">Anton H. P. Stumpel</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute for Forestry and Nature Research, Postbus 23, NL-6700, AA Wageningen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Landscape Ecology</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Landscape Ecol</title><idno type="ISSN">0921-2973</idno><idno type="eISSN">1572-9761</idno><imprint><publisher>Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Dordrecht</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1996-08-01">1996-08-01</date><biblScope unit="volume">11</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="203">203</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="214">214</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0921-2973</idno></series><idno type="istex">50CFA24CE052E1FB086FBF79BE888A9C46AA481B</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1007/BF02071811</idno><idno type="ArticleID">BF02071811</idno><idno type="ArticleID">Art3</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0921-2973</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: The distribution pattern of the tree frog (Hyla arborea) in an intensively used agricultural landscape in Zealand Flanders, was analyzed for effects of habitat fragmentation. The logistic regression models showed that the chance that a pond (potential reproduction site) was occupied by tree frogs depended on three isolation factors. The density of ponds within 750 m of the occupied pond was higher compared to ponds that remained unoccupied during the survey period. Additionally both the density of shrubs as well as the density of high herbs, two terrestrial habitat factors, was higher within 1000 m of occupied ponds. The explanatory value of two different types of isolation measures was compared with logistic regression analysis. It is discussed that ‘Concentric isolation measures’, which take size and distance of potential habitat patches in all directions into account, are expected to give a better description of isolation than the more often used 'distance from the nearest habitat patch'.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>springer</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Claire C. Vos</name><affiliations><json:string>Institute for Forestry and Nature Research, Postbus 23, NL-6700, AA Wageningen, The Netherlands</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Anton H. P. Stumpel</name><affiliations><json:string>Institute for Forestry and Nature Research, Postbus 23, NL-6700, AA Wageningen, The Netherlands</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>BF02071811</json:string><json:string>Art3</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>OriginalPaper</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Abstract: The distribution pattern of the tree frog (Hyla arborea) in an intensively used agricultural landscape in Zealand Flanders, was analyzed for effects of habitat fragmentation. The logistic regression models showed that the chance that a pond (potential reproduction site) was occupied by tree frogs depended on three isolation factors. The density of ponds within 750 m of the occupied pond was higher compared to ponds that remained unoccupied during the survey period. Additionally both the density of shrubs as well as the density of high herbs, two terrestrial habitat factors, was higher within 1000 m of occupied ponds. The explanatory value of two different types of isolation measures was compared with logistic regression analysis. It is discussed that ‘Concentric isolation measures’, which take size and distance of potential habitat patches in all directions into account, are expected to give a better description of isolation than the more often used 'distance from the nearest habitat patch'.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.872</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>533 x 734.28 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><keywordCount>0</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>1016</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>5576</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>32083</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>12</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>156</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Comparison of habitat-isolation parameters in relation to fragmented distribution patterns in the tree frog ( Hyla arborea )</title><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><volume>11</volume><pages><last>214</last><first>203</first></pages><issn><json:string>0921-2973</json:string></issn><issue>4</issue><subject><json:item><value>Ecology</value></json:item><json:item><value>Plant Ecology</value></json:item><json:item><value>Forestry</value></json:item><json:item><value>Forestry Management</value></json:item><json:item><value>Landscape Ecology</value></json:item><json:item><value>Plant Sciences</value></json:item></subject><journalId><json:string>10980</json:string></journalId><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1572-9761</json:string></eissn><title>Landscape Ecology</title><publicationDate>1996</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1996</copyrightDate></host><categories><wos><json:string>science</json:string><json:string>geosciences, multidisciplinary</json:string><json:string>geography, physical</json:string><json:string>ecology</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>natural sciences</json:string><json:string>biology</json:string><json:string>ecology</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>1996</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1996</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1007/BF02071811</json:string></doi><id>50CFA24CE052E1FB086FBF79BE888A9C46AA481B</id><score>0.046941068</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/50CFA24CE052E1FB086FBF79BE888A9C46AA481B/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/50CFA24CE052E1FB086FBF79BE888A9C46AA481B/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/50CFA24CE052E1FB086FBF79BE888A9C46AA481B/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Comparison of habitat-isolation parameters in relation to fragmented distribution patterns in the tree frog ( Hyla arborea )</title><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Dordrecht</pubPlace><availability><p>SPB Academic Publishing, 1996</p></availability><date>1996</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Comparison of habitat-isolation parameters in relation to fragmented distribution patterns in the tree frog ( Hyla arborea )</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Claire</forename><surname>Vos</surname></persName><affiliation>Institute for Forestry and Nature Research, Postbus 23, NL-6700, AA Wageningen, The Netherlands</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">Anton</forename><surname>Stumpel</surname></persName><affiliation>Institute for Forestry and Nature Research, Postbus 23, NL-6700, AA Wageningen, The Netherlands</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Landscape Ecology</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Landscape Ecol</title><idno type="journal-ID">10980</idno><idno type="pISSN">0921-2973</idno><idno type="eISSN">1572-9761</idno><idno type="issue-article-count">6</idno><idno type="volume-issue-count">6</idno><imprint><publisher>Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Dordrecht</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1996-08-01"></date><biblScope unit="volume">11</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="203">203</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="214">214</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">50CFA24CE052E1FB086FBF79BE888A9C46AA481B</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1007/BF02071811</idno><idno type="ArticleID">BF02071811</idno><idno type="ArticleID">Art3</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1996</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Abstract: The distribution pattern of the tree frog (Hyla arborea) in an intensively used agricultural landscape in Zealand Flanders, was analyzed for effects of habitat fragmentation. The logistic regression models showed that the chance that a pond (potential reproduction site) was occupied by tree frogs depended on three isolation factors. The density of ponds within 750 m of the occupied pond was higher compared to ponds that remained unoccupied during the survey period. Additionally both the density of shrubs as well as the density of high herbs, two terrestrial habitat factors, was higher within 1000 m of occupied ponds. The explanatory value of two different types of isolation measures was compared with logistic regression analysis. It is discussed that ‘Concentric isolation measures’, which take size and distance of potential habitat patches in all directions into account, are expected to give a better description of isolation than the more often used 'distance from the nearest habitat patch'.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="Journal Subject"><list><head>Life Sciences</head><item><term>Ecology</term></item><item><term>Plant Ecology</term></item><item><term>Forestry</term></item><item><term>Forestry Management</term></item><item><term>Landscape Ecology</term></item><item><term>Plant Sciences</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1996-08-01">Published</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2016-11-22">References added</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2017-01-21">References added</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/50CFA24CE052E1FB086FBF79BE888A9C46AA481B/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Springer, Publisher found" wicri:toSee="no header"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//Springer-Verlag//DTD A++ V2.4//EN" URI="http://devel.springer.de/A++/V2.4/DTD/A++V2.4.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><Publisher><PublisherInfo><PublisherName>Kluwer Academic Publishers</PublisherName><PublisherLocation>Dordrecht</PublisherLocation></PublisherInfo><Journal><JournalInfo JournalProductType="ArchiveJournal" NumberingStyle="Unnumbered"><JournalID>10980</JournalID><JournalPrintISSN>0921-2973</JournalPrintISSN><JournalElectronicISSN>1572-9761</JournalElectronicISSN><JournalTitle>Landscape Ecology</JournalTitle><JournalAbbreviatedTitle>Landscape Ecol</JournalAbbreviatedTitle><JournalSubjectGroup><JournalSubject Type="Primary">Life Sciences</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Ecology</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Plant Ecology</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Forestry</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Forestry Management</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Landscape Ecology</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Plant Sciences</JournalSubject></JournalSubjectGroup></JournalInfo><Volume><VolumeInfo VolumeType="Regular" TocLevels="0"><VolumeIDStart>11</VolumeIDStart><VolumeIDEnd>11</VolumeIDEnd><VolumeIssueCount>6</VolumeIssueCount></VolumeInfo><Issue IssueType="Regular"><IssueInfo TocLevels="0"><IssueIDStart>4</IssueIDStart><IssueIDEnd>4</IssueIDEnd><IssueArticleCount>6</IssueArticleCount><IssueHistory><CoverDate><Year>1996</Year><Month>8</Month></CoverDate></IssueHistory><IssueCopyright><CopyrightHolderName>SPB Academic Publishing</CopyrightHolderName><CopyrightYear>1996</CopyrightYear></IssueCopyright></IssueInfo><Article ID="Art3"><ArticleInfo Language="En" ArticleType="OriginalPaper" NumberingStyle="Unnumbered" TocLevels="0" ContainsESM="No"><ArticleID>BF02071811</ArticleID><ArticleDOI>10.1007/BF02071811</ArticleDOI><ArticleSequenceNumber>3</ArticleSequenceNumber><ArticleTitle Language="En">Comparison of habitat-isolation parameters in relation to fragmented distribution patterns in the tree frog (<Emphasis Type="Italic">Hyla arborea</Emphasis>)</ArticleTitle><ArticleFirstPage>203</ArticleFirstPage><ArticleLastPage>214</ArticleLastPage><ArticleHistory><RegistrationDate><Year>2005</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>27</Day></RegistrationDate></ArticleHistory><ArticleCopyright><CopyrightHolderName>SPB Academic Publishing</CopyrightHolderName><CopyrightYear>1996</CopyrightYear></ArticleCopyright><ArticleGrants Type="Regular"><MetadataGrant Grant="OpenAccess"></MetadataGrant><AbstractGrant Grant="OpenAccess"></AbstractGrant><BodyPDFGrant Grant="Restricted"></BodyPDFGrant><BodyHTMLGrant Grant="Restricted"></BodyHTMLGrant><BibliographyGrant Grant="Restricted"></BibliographyGrant><ESMGrant Grant="Restricted"></ESMGrant></ArticleGrants><ArticleContext><JournalID>10980</JournalID><VolumeIDStart>11</VolumeIDStart><VolumeIDEnd>11</VolumeIDEnd><IssueIDStart>4</IssueIDStart><IssueIDEnd>4</IssueIDEnd></ArticleContext></ArticleInfo><ArticleHeader><AuthorGroup><Author AffiliationIDS="Aff1"><AuthorName DisplayOrder="Western"><GivenName>Claire</GivenName><GivenName>C.</GivenName><FamilyName>Vos</FamilyName></AuthorName></Author><Author AffiliationIDS="Aff1"><AuthorName DisplayOrder="Western"><GivenName>Anton</GivenName><GivenName>H.</GivenName><GivenName>P.</GivenName><FamilyName>Stumpel</FamilyName></AuthorName></Author><Affiliation ID="Aff1"><OrgName>Institute for Forestry and Nature Research</OrgName><OrgAddress><Postbox>Postbus 23</Postbox><Postcode>NL-6700</Postcode><City>AA Wageningen</City><Country>The Netherlands</Country></OrgAddress></Affiliation></AuthorGroup><Abstract ID="Abs1" Language="En"><Heading>Abstract</Heading><Para>The distribution pattern of the tree frog (<Emphasis Type="Italic">Hyla arborea</Emphasis>) in an intensively used agricultural landscape in Zealand Flanders, was analyzed for effects of habitat fragmentation. The logistic regression models showed that the chance that a pond (potential reproduction site) was occupied by tree frogs depended on three isolation factors. The density of ponds within 750 m of the occupied pond was higher compared to ponds that remained unoccupied during the survey period. Additionally both the density of shrubs as well as the density of high herbs, two terrestrial habitat factors, was higher within 1000 m of occupied ponds. The explanatory value of two different types of isolation measures was compared with logistic regression analysis. It is discussed that ‘Concentric isolation measures’, which take size and distance of potential habitat patches in all directions into account, are expected to give a better description of isolation than the more often used 'distance from the nearest habitat patch'.</Para></Abstract><KeywordGroup Language="En"><Heading>Keywords</Heading><Keyword>habitat fragmentation</Keyword><Keyword>isolation</Keyword><Keyword>amphibians</Keyword><Keyword>landscape planning</Keyword></KeywordGroup></ArticleHeader><NoBody></NoBody></Article></Issue></Volume></Journal></Publisher></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Comparison of habitat-isolation parameters in relation to fragmented distribution patterns in the tree frog ( Hyla arborea )</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Comparison of habitat-isolation parameters in relation to fragmented distribution patterns in the tree frog (Hyla arborea)</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Claire</namePart><namePart type="given">C.</namePart><namePart type="family">Vos</namePart><affiliation>Institute for Forestry and Nature Research, Postbus 23, NL-6700, AA Wageningen, The Netherlands</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Anton</namePart><namePart type="given">H.</namePart><namePart type="given">P.</namePart><namePart type="family">Stumpel</namePart><affiliation>Institute for Forestry and Nature Research, Postbus 23, NL-6700, AA Wageningen, The Netherlands</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="OriginalPaper"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Dordrecht</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1996-08-01</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1996</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Abstract: The distribution pattern of the tree frog (Hyla arborea) in an intensively used agricultural landscape in Zealand Flanders, was analyzed for effects of habitat fragmentation. The logistic regression models showed that the chance that a pond (potential reproduction site) was occupied by tree frogs depended on three isolation factors. The density of ponds within 750 m of the occupied pond was higher compared to ponds that remained unoccupied during the survey period. Additionally both the density of shrubs as well as the density of high herbs, two terrestrial habitat factors, was higher within 1000 m of occupied ponds. The explanatory value of two different types of isolation measures was compared with logistic regression analysis. It is discussed that ‘Concentric isolation measures’, which take size and distance of potential habitat patches in all directions into account, are expected to give a better description of isolation than the more often used 'distance from the nearest habitat patch'.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Landscape Ecology</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Landscape Ecol</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" displayLabel="Archive Journal"></genre><originInfo><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1996-08-01</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1996</copyrightDate></originInfo><subject><genre>Life Sciences</genre><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Plant Ecology</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Forestry Management</topic><topic>Landscape Ecology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0921-2973</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1572-9761</identifier><identifier type="JournalID">10980</identifier><identifier type="IssueArticleCount">6</identifier><identifier type="VolumeIssueCount">6</identifier><part><date>1996</date><detail type="volume"><number>11</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="issue"><number>4</number><caption>no.</caption></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>203</start><end>214</end></extent></part><recordInfo><recordOrigin>SPB Academic Publishing, 1996</recordOrigin></recordInfo></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">50CFA24CE052E1FB086FBF79BE888A9C46AA481B</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1007/BF02071811</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">BF02071811</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">Art3</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">SPB Academic Publishing, 1996</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>SPRINGER</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>SPB Academic Publishing, 1996</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Agronomie/explor/SisAgriV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000744 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000744 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Agronomie
|area= SisAgriV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:50CFA24CE052E1FB086FBF79BE888A9C46AA481B
|texte= Comparison of habitat-isolation parameters in relation to fragmented distribution patterns in the tree frog ( Hyla arborea )
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.28. |  |