Science, Law, and Politics in FDA's Genetically Engineered Foods Policy: Scientific Concerns and Uncertainties
Identifieur interne : 000520 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000519; suivant : 000521Science, Law, and Politics in FDA's Genetically Engineered Foods Policy: Scientific Concerns and Uncertainties
Auteurs : David L. PelletierSource :
- Nutrition Reviews [ 0029-6643 ] ; 2005-06.
English descriptors
Abstract
The Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) 1992 policy statement granted genetically engineered foods presumptive GRAS (generally recognized as safe) status. Since then, divergent views have been expressed concerning the scientific support for this policy. This paper examines four sources to better understand the basis for these claims: 1) internal FDA correspondence; 2) reports from the National Academy of Sciences; 3) research funded by US Department of Agriculture from 1981 to 2002; and 4) FDA's proposed rules issued in 2001. These sources reveal that little research has been conducted on unintended compositional changes from genetic engineering. Profiling techniques now make this feasible, but the new debate centers on the functional meaning of compositional changes.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2005.tb00139.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:5DEA25A76F0D1D9A96AFC6BEDDB809A8F902C859Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Science, Law, and Politics in FDA's Genetically Engineered Foods Policy: Scientific Concerns and Uncertainties</title><author><name sortKey="Pelletier, David L" sort="Pelletier, David L" uniqKey="Pelletier D" first="David L." last="Pelletier">David L. Pelletier</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: dlp5@cornell.edu.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:5DEA25A76F0D1D9A96AFC6BEDDB809A8F902C859</idno><date when="2005" year="2005">2005</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1753-4887.2005.tb00139.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/5DEA25A76F0D1D9A96AFC6BEDDB809A8F902C859/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000520</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000520</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Science, Law, and Politics in FDA's Genetically Engineered Foods Policy: Scientific Concerns and Uncertainties</title><author><name sortKey="Pelletier, David L" sort="Pelletier, David L" uniqKey="Pelletier D" first="David L." last="Pelletier">David L. Pelletier</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: dlp5@cornell.edu.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Nutrition Reviews</title><idno type="ISSN">0029-6643</idno><idno type="eISSN">1753-4887</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2005-06">2005-06</date><biblScope unit="volume">63</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="210">210</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="223">223</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0029-6643</idno></series><idno type="istex">5DEA25A76F0D1D9A96AFC6BEDDB809A8F902C859</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1753-4887.2005.tb00139.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">NURE210</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0029-6643</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>scientific evidence</term><term>substantial equivalence</term><term>unintended effects</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) 1992 policy statement granted genetically engineered foods presumptive GRAS (generally recognized as safe) status. Since then, divergent views have been expressed concerning the scientific support for this policy. This paper examines four sources to better understand the basis for these claims: 1) internal FDA correspondence; 2) reports from the National Academy of Sciences; 3) research funded by US Department of Agriculture from 1981 to 2002; and 4) FDA's proposed rules issued in 2001. These sources reveal that little research has been conducted on unintended compositional changes from genetic engineering. Profiling techniques now make this feasible, but the new debate centers on the functional meaning of compositional changes.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>David L. Pelletier PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.</json:string><json:string>E-mail: dlp5@cornell.edu.</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>unintended effects</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>scientific evidence</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>substantial equivalence</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>NURE210</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>miscellaneous</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>The Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) 1992 policy statement granted genetically engineered foods presumptive GRAS (generally recognized as safe) status. Since then, divergent views have been expressed concerning the scientific support for this policy. This paper examines four sources to better understand the basis for these claims: 1) internal FDA correspondence; 2) reports from the National Academy of Sciences; 3) research funded by US Department of Agriculture from 1981 to 2002; and 4) FDA's proposed rules issued in 2001. These sources reveal that little research has been conducted on unintended compositional changes from genetic engineering. Profiling techniques now make this feasible, but the new debate centers on the functional meaning of compositional changes.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.356</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>612 x 801 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>781</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>9099</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>58189</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>14</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>113</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Science, Law, and Politics in FDA's Genetically Engineered Foods Policy: Scientific Concerns and Uncertainties</title><genre><json:string>other</json:string></genre><host><volume>63</volume><publisherId><json:string>NURE</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>14</total><last>223</last><first>210</first></pages><issn><json:string>0029-6643</json:string></issn><issue>6</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1753-4887</json:string></eissn><title>Nutrition Reviews</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1753-4887</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>science</json:string><json:string>nutrition & dietetics</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>health sciences</json:string><json:string>biomedical research</json:string><json:string>nutrition & dietetics</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2005</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2005</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1753-4887.2005.tb00139.x</json:string></doi><id>5DEA25A76F0D1D9A96AFC6BEDDB809A8F902C859</id><score>0.037704695</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5DEA25A76F0D1D9A96AFC6BEDDB809A8F902C859/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5DEA25A76F0D1D9A96AFC6BEDDB809A8F902C859/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/5DEA25A76F0D1D9A96AFC6BEDDB809A8F902C859/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Science, Law, and Politics in FDA's Genetically Engineered Foods Policy: Scientific Concerns and Uncertainties</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>WILEY</p></availability><date>2005</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Science, Law, and Politics in FDA's Genetically Engineered Foods Policy: Scientific Concerns and Uncertainties</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">David L.</forename><surname>Pelletier</surname></persName><roleName type="degree">PhD</roleName><email>dlp5@cornell.edu.</email><affiliation>Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Nutrition Reviews</title><idno type="pISSN">0029-6643</idno><idno type="eISSN">1753-4887</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1753-4887</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2005-06"></date><biblScope unit="volume">63</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="210">210</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="223">223</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">5DEA25A76F0D1D9A96AFC6BEDDB809A8F902C859</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1753-4887.2005.tb00139.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">NURE210</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2005</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) 1992 policy statement granted genetically engineered foods presumptive GRAS (generally recognized as safe) status. Since then, divergent views have been expressed concerning the scientific support for this policy. This paper examines four sources to better understand the basis for these claims: 1) internal FDA correspondence; 2) reports from the National Academy of Sciences; 3) research funded by US Department of Agriculture from 1981 to 2002; and 4) FDA's proposed rules issued in 2001. These sources reveal that little research has been conducted on unintended compositional changes from genetic engineering. Profiling techniques now make this feasible, but the new debate centers on the functional meaning of compositional changes.</p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>keywords</head><item><term>unintended effects</term></item><item><term>scientific evidence</term></item><item><term>substantial equivalence</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2005-06">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5DEA25A76F0D1D9A96AFC6BEDDB809A8F902C859/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1753-4887</doi><issn type="print">0029-6643</issn><issn type="electronic">1753-4887</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="NURE"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="NUTRITION REVIEWS">Nutrition Reviews</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="06006"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/nure.2005.63.issue-6</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="63">63</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="6">6</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2005-06">June 2005</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="miscellaneous" position="0021000" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1753-4887.2005.tb00139.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="NURE210"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="14"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Nutrition Science and Policy</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2008-07-15"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2008-07-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.6 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-04-21"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-02-03"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-11-03"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="210">210</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="223">223</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo> Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, 378 MVR Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853; Phone: 607–255–1086; Fax: 607–255–0178; E‐mail: <email>dlp5@cornell.edu.</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:NURE.NURE210.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="referenceTotal" number="57"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="2"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Science, Law, and Politics in FDA's Genetically Engineered Foods Policy: Scientific Concerns and Uncertainties</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>David L.</givenNames><familyName>Pelletier</familyName><degrees>PhD</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="US"><unparsedAffiliation>Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">unintended effects</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">scientific evidence</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">substantial equivalence</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>The Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) 1992 policy statement granted genetically engineered foods presumptive GRAS (generally recognized as safe) status. Since then, divergent views have been expressed concerning the scientific support for this policy. This paper examines four sources to better understand the basis for these claims: 1) internal FDA correspondence; 2) reports from the National Academy of Sciences; 3) research funded by US Department of Agriculture from 1981 to 2002; and 4) FDA's proposed rules issued in 2001. These sources reveal that little research has been conducted on unintended compositional changes from genetic engineering. Profiling techniques now make this feasible, but the new debate centers on the functional meaning of compositional changes.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Science, Law, and Politics in FDA's Genetically Engineered Foods Policy: Scientific Concerns and Uncertainties</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Science, Law, and Politics in FDA's Genetically Engineered Foods Policy: Scientific Concerns and Uncertainties</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">David L.</namePart><namePart type="family">Pelletier</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">PhD</namePart><affiliation>Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: dlp5@cornell.edu.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="other" displayLabel="miscellaneous"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2005-06</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2005</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="references">57</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">The Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) 1992 policy statement granted genetically engineered foods presumptive GRAS (generally recognized as safe) status. Since then, divergent views have been expressed concerning the scientific support for this policy. This paper examines four sources to better understand the basis for these claims: 1) internal FDA correspondence; 2) reports from the National Academy of Sciences; 3) research funded by US Department of Agriculture from 1981 to 2002; and 4) FDA's proposed rules issued in 2001. These sources reveal that little research has been conducted on unintended compositional changes from genetic engineering. Profiling techniques now make this feasible, but the new debate centers on the functional meaning of compositional changes.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>unintended effects</topic><topic>scientific evidence</topic><topic>substantial equivalence</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Nutrition Reviews</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0029-6643</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1753-4887</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1753-4887</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">NURE</identifier><part><date>2005</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>63</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>6</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>210</start><end>223</end><total>14</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">5DEA25A76F0D1D9A96AFC6BEDDB809A8F902C859</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1753-4887.2005.tb00139.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">NURE210</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Agronomie/explor/SisAgriV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000520 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000520 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Agronomie
|area= SisAgriV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:5DEA25A76F0D1D9A96AFC6BEDDB809A8F902C859
|texte= Science, Law, and Politics in FDA's Genetically Engineered Foods Policy: Scientific Concerns and Uncertainties
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.28. |  |