Serveur d'exploration sur la recherche en informatique en Lorraine

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Automatic decidability and combinability

Identifieur interne : 000871 ( PascalFrancis/Curation ); précédent : 000870; suivant : 000872

Automatic decidability and combinability

Auteurs : Christopher Lynch [États-Unis] ; Silvio Ranise [Italie] ; Christophe Ringeissen [France] ; Duc-Khanh Tran [Namibie]

Source :

RBID : Pascal:11-0330330

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Verification problems can often be encoded as first-order validity or satisfiability problems. The availability of efficient automated theorem provers is a crucial pre-requisite for automating various verification tasks as well as their cooperation with specialized decision procedures for selected theories, such as Presburger Arithmetic. In this paper, we investigate how automated provers based on a form of equational reasoning, called paramodulation, can be used in verification tools. More precisely, given a theory T axiomatizing some data structure, we devise a procedure to answer the following questions. Is the satisfiability problem of T decidable by paramodulation? Can a procedure based on paramodulation for T be efficiently combined with other specialized procedures by using the Nelson-Oppen schema? Finally, if paramodulation decides the satisfiability problem of two theories, does it decide satisfiability in their union? The procedure capable of answering all questions above is based on Schematic Saturation; an inference system capable of over-approximating the inferences of paramodulation when solving satisfiability problems in a given theory T. Clause schemas derived by Schematic Saturation describe all clauses derived by paramodulation so that the answers to the questions above are obtained by checking that only finitely many different clause schemas are derived or that certain clause schemas are not derived.
pA  
A01 01  1    @0 0890-5401
A02 01      @0 INFCEC
A03   1    @0 Inf. comput. : (Print)
A05       @2 209
A06       @2 7
A08 01  1  ENG  @1 Automatic decidability and combinability
A11 01  1    @1 LYNCH (Christopher)
A11 02  1    @1 RANISE (Silvio)
A11 03  1    @1 RINGEISSEN (Christophe)
A11 04  1    @1 TRAN (Duc-Khanh)
A14 01      @1 Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, P.O. Box 5815 Clarkson University @2 Potsdam, NY 13699-5815 @3 USA @Z 1 aut.
A14 02      @1 FBK-Irst, Via Sommarive 18 @2 38100 Povo, Trento @3 ITA @Z 2 aut.
A14 03      @1 LORIA - INRIA Lorraine, 615, rue du Jardin Botanique, BP 101 @2 54602 Villers-les-Nancy @3 FRA @Z 3 aut.
A14 04      @1 School of Information and Communication Technology, Hanoi University of Science and Technology, 1 Dai Co Viet @2 Hanoi @3 NAM @Z 4 aut.
A20       @1 1026-1047
A21       @1 2011
A23 01      @0 ENG
A43 01      @1 INIST @2 8341 @5 354000509420520030
A44       @0 0000 @1 © 2011 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.
A45       @0 34 ref.
A47 01  1    @0 11-0330330
A60       @1 P
A61       @0 A
A64 01  1    @0 Information and computation : (Print)
A66 01      @0 NLD
C01 01    ENG  @0 Verification problems can often be encoded as first-order validity or satisfiability problems. The availability of efficient automated theorem provers is a crucial pre-requisite for automating various verification tasks as well as their cooperation with specialized decision procedures for selected theories, such as Presburger Arithmetic. In this paper, we investigate how automated provers based on a form of equational reasoning, called paramodulation, can be used in verification tools. More precisely, given a theory T axiomatizing some data structure, we devise a procedure to answer the following questions. Is the satisfiability problem of T decidable by paramodulation? Can a procedure based on paramodulation for T be efficiently combined with other specialized procedures by using the Nelson-Oppen schema? Finally, if paramodulation decides the satisfiability problem of two theories, does it decide satisfiability in their union? The procedure capable of answering all questions above is based on Schematic Saturation; an inference system capable of over-approximating the inferences of paramodulation when solving satisfiability problems in a given theory T. Clause schemas derived by Schematic Saturation describe all clauses derived by paramodulation so that the answers to the questions above are obtained by checking that only finitely many different clause schemas are derived or that certain clause schemas are not derived.
C02 01  X    @0 001D02A08
C02 02  X    @0 001D02B09
C02 03  X    @0 001D02B07B
C02 04  X    @0 001A02E11
C03 01  X  FRE  @0 Informatique théorique @5 01
C03 01  X  ENG  @0 Computer theory @5 01
C03 01  X  SPA  @0 Informática teórica @5 01
C03 02  X  FRE  @0 Automatique @5 17
C03 02  X  ENG  @0 Automatic @5 17
C03 02  X  SPA  @0 Automático @5 17
C03 03  X  FRE  @0 Décidabilité @5 18
C03 03  X  ENG  @0 Decidability @5 18
C03 03  X  SPA  @0 Decidibilidad @5 18
C03 04  X  FRE  @0 Vérification @5 19
C03 04  X  ENG  @0 Verification @5 19
C03 04  X  SPA  @0 Verificación @5 19
C03 05  X  FRE  @0 Equation ordre 1 @5 20
C03 05  X  ENG  @0 First order equation @5 20
C03 05  X  SPA  @0 Ecuación orden 1 @5 20
C03 06  X  FRE  @0 Disponibilité @5 21
C03 06  X  ENG  @0 Availability @5 21
C03 06  X  SPA  @0 Disponibilidad @5 21
C03 07  X  FRE  @0 Coopération @5 22
C03 07  X  ENG  @0 Cooperation @5 22
C03 07  X  SPA  @0 Cooperación @5 22
C03 08  X  FRE  @0 Théorie décision @5 23
C03 08  X  ENG  @0 Decision theory @5 23
C03 08  X  SPA  @0 Teoría decisión @5 23
C03 09  X  FRE  @0 Arithmétique Presburger @5 24
C03 09  X  ENG  @0 Presburger arithmetic @5 24
C03 09  X  SPA  @0 Aritmético Presburger @5 24
C03 10  X  FRE  @0 Structure donnée @5 25
C03 10  X  ENG  @0 Data structure @5 25
C03 10  X  SPA  @0 Estructura datos @5 25
C03 11  X  FRE  @0 Problème satisfiabilité @5 26
C03 11  X  ENG  @0 Satisfiability problem @5 26
C03 11  X  SPA  @0 Problema satisfactibilidad @5 26
C03 12  X  FRE  @0 Question réponse @5 27
C03 12  X  ENG  @0 Question answering @5 27
C03 12  X  SPA  @0 Pregunta respuesta @5 27
C03 13  X  FRE  @0 Saturation @5 28
C03 13  X  ENG  @0 Saturation @5 28
C03 13  X  SPA  @0 Saturación @5 28
C03 14  X  FRE  @0 Résolution problème @5 29
C03 14  X  ENG  @0 Problem solving @5 29
C03 14  X  SPA  @0 Resolución problema @5 29
C03 15  X  FRE  @0 68Q60 @4 INC @5 70
C03 16  X  FRE  @0 Satisfiabilité @4 INC @5 71
C03 17  X  FRE  @0 Procédure décision @4 INC @5 72
C03 18  X  FRE  @0 Raisonnement équationnel @4 INC @5 73
C03 19  X  FRE  @0 68P05 @4 INC @5 74
C03 20  X  FRE  @0 Satisfiability problem @4 INC @5 75
C03 21  X  FRE  @0 41A40 @4 INC @5 76
C03 22  X  FRE  @0 68T20 @4 INC @5 77
N21       @1 227
N44 01      @1 OTO
N82       @1 OTO

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

Pascal:11-0330330

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Automatic decidability and combinability</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Lynch, Christopher" sort="Lynch, Christopher" uniqKey="Lynch C" first="Christopher" last="Lynch">Christopher Lynch</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, P.O. Box 5815 Clarkson University</s1>
<s2>Potsdam, NY 13699-5815</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ranise, Silvio" sort="Ranise, Silvio" uniqKey="Ranise S" first="Silvio" last="Ranise">Silvio Ranise</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>FBK-Irst, Via Sommarive 18</s1>
<s2>38100 Povo, Trento</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Italie</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ringeissen, Christophe" sort="Ringeissen, Christophe" uniqKey="Ringeissen C" first="Christophe" last="Ringeissen">Christophe Ringeissen</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="03">
<s1>LORIA - INRIA Lorraine, 615, rue du Jardin Botanique, BP 101</s1>
<s2>54602 Villers-les-Nancy</s2>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>France</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Tran, Duc Khanh" sort="Tran, Duc Khanh" uniqKey="Tran D" first="Duc-Khanh" last="Tran">Duc-Khanh Tran</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="04">
<s1>School of Information and Communication Technology, Hanoi University of Science and Technology, 1 Dai Co Viet</s1>
<s2>Hanoi</s2>
<s3>NAM</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Namibie</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">11-0330330</idno>
<date when="2011">2011</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 11-0330330 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:11-0330330</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000142</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Curation">000871</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Automatic decidability and combinability</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Lynch, Christopher" sort="Lynch, Christopher" uniqKey="Lynch C" first="Christopher" last="Lynch">Christopher Lynch</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, P.O. Box 5815 Clarkson University</s1>
<s2>Potsdam, NY 13699-5815</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ranise, Silvio" sort="Ranise, Silvio" uniqKey="Ranise S" first="Silvio" last="Ranise">Silvio Ranise</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>FBK-Irst, Via Sommarive 18</s1>
<s2>38100 Povo, Trento</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Italie</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ringeissen, Christophe" sort="Ringeissen, Christophe" uniqKey="Ringeissen C" first="Christophe" last="Ringeissen">Christophe Ringeissen</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="03">
<s1>LORIA - INRIA Lorraine, 615, rue du Jardin Botanique, BP 101</s1>
<s2>54602 Villers-les-Nancy</s2>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>France</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Tran, Duc Khanh" sort="Tran, Duc Khanh" uniqKey="Tran D" first="Duc-Khanh" last="Tran">Duc-Khanh Tran</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="04">
<s1>School of Information and Communication Technology, Hanoi University of Science and Technology, 1 Dai Co Viet</s1>
<s2>Hanoi</s2>
<s3>NAM</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Namibie</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Information and computation : (Print)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Inf. comput. : (Print)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0890-5401</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2011">2011</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">Information and computation : (Print)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Inf. comput. : (Print)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0890-5401</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Automatic</term>
<term>Availability</term>
<term>Computer theory</term>
<term>Cooperation</term>
<term>Data structure</term>
<term>Decidability</term>
<term>Decision theory</term>
<term>First order equation</term>
<term>Presburger arithmetic</term>
<term>Problem solving</term>
<term>Question answering</term>
<term>Satisfiability problem</term>
<term>Saturation</term>
<term>Verification</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Informatique théorique</term>
<term>Automatique</term>
<term>Décidabilité</term>
<term>Vérification</term>
<term>Equation ordre 1</term>
<term>Disponibilité</term>
<term>Coopération</term>
<term>Théorie décision</term>
<term>Arithmétique Presburger</term>
<term>Structure donnée</term>
<term>Problème satisfiabilité</term>
<term>Question réponse</term>
<term>Saturation</term>
<term>Résolution problème</term>
<term>68Q60</term>
<term>Satisfiabilité</term>
<term>Procédure décision</term>
<term>Raisonnement équationnel</term>
<term>68P05</term>
<term>Satisfiability problem</term>
<term>41A40</term>
<term>68T20</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Verification problems can often be encoded as first-order validity or satisfiability problems. The availability of efficient automated theorem provers is a crucial pre-requisite for automating various verification tasks as well as their cooperation with specialized decision procedures for selected theories, such as Presburger Arithmetic. In this paper, we investigate how automated provers based on a form of equational reasoning, called paramodulation, can be used in verification tools. More precisely, given a theory T axiomatizing some data structure, we devise a procedure to answer the following questions. Is the satisfiability problem of T decidable by paramodulation? Can a procedure based on paramodulation for T be efficiently combined with other specialized procedures by using the Nelson-Oppen schema? Finally, if paramodulation decides the satisfiability problem of two theories, does it decide satisfiability in their union? The procedure capable of answering all questions above is based on Schematic Saturation; an inference system capable of over-approximating the inferences of paramodulation when solving satisfiability problems in a given theory T. Clause schemas derived by Schematic Saturation describe all clauses derived by paramodulation so that the answers to the questions above are obtained by checking that only finitely many different clause schemas are derived or that certain clause schemas are not derived.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>0890-5401</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01">
<s0>INFCEC</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>Inf. comput. : (Print)</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>209</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06>
<s2>7</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Automatic decidability and combinability</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>LYNCH (Christopher)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>RANISE (Silvio)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1">
<s1>RINGEISSEN (Christophe)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1">
<s1>TRAN (Duc-Khanh)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, P.O. Box 5815 Clarkson University</s1>
<s2>Potsdam, NY 13699-5815</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02">
<s1>FBK-Irst, Via Sommarive 18</s1>
<s2>38100 Povo, Trento</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="03">
<s1>LORIA - INRIA Lorraine, 615, rue du Jardin Botanique, BP 101</s1>
<s2>54602 Villers-les-Nancy</s2>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="04">
<s1>School of Information and Communication Technology, Hanoi University of Science and Technology, 1 Dai Co Viet</s1>
<s2>Hanoi</s2>
<s3>NAM</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20>
<s1>1026-1047</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2011</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>8341</s2>
<s5>354000509420520030</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2011 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>34 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>11-0330330</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>Information and computation : (Print)</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>NLD</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>Verification problems can often be encoded as first-order validity or satisfiability problems. The availability of efficient automated theorem provers is a crucial pre-requisite for automating various verification tasks as well as their cooperation with specialized decision procedures for selected theories, such as Presburger Arithmetic. In this paper, we investigate how automated provers based on a form of equational reasoning, called paramodulation, can be used in verification tools. More precisely, given a theory T axiomatizing some data structure, we devise a procedure to answer the following questions. Is the satisfiability problem of T decidable by paramodulation? Can a procedure based on paramodulation for T be efficiently combined with other specialized procedures by using the Nelson-Oppen schema? Finally, if paramodulation decides the satisfiability problem of two theories, does it decide satisfiability in their union? The procedure capable of answering all questions above is based on Schematic Saturation; an inference system capable of over-approximating the inferences of paramodulation when solving satisfiability problems in a given theory T. Clause schemas derived by Schematic Saturation describe all clauses derived by paramodulation so that the answers to the questions above are obtained by checking that only finitely many different clause schemas are derived or that certain clause schemas are not derived.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X">
<s0>001D02A08</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X">
<s0>001D02B09</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="03" i2="X">
<s0>001D02B07B</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="04" i2="X">
<s0>001A02E11</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Informatique théorique</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Computer theory</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Informática teórica</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Automatique</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Automatic</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Automático</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Décidabilité</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Decidability</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Decidibilidad</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Vérification</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Verification</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Verificación</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Equation ordre 1</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>First order equation</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Ecuación orden 1</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Disponibilité</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Availability</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Disponibilidad</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Coopération</s0>
<s5>22</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Cooperation</s0>
<s5>22</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Cooperación</s0>
<s5>22</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Théorie décision</s0>
<s5>23</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Decision theory</s0>
<s5>23</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Teoría decisión</s0>
<s5>23</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Arithmétique Presburger</s0>
<s5>24</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Presburger arithmetic</s0>
<s5>24</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Aritmético Presburger</s0>
<s5>24</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Structure donnée</s0>
<s5>25</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Data structure</s0>
<s5>25</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Estructura datos</s0>
<s5>25</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Problème satisfiabilité</s0>
<s5>26</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Satisfiability problem</s0>
<s5>26</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Problema satisfactibilidad</s0>
<s5>26</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Question réponse</s0>
<s5>27</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Question answering</s0>
<s5>27</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Pregunta respuesta</s0>
<s5>27</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Saturation</s0>
<s5>28</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Saturation</s0>
<s5>28</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Saturación</s0>
<s5>28</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Résolution problème</s0>
<s5>29</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Problem solving</s0>
<s5>29</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Resolución problema</s0>
<s5>29</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="15" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>68Q60</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>70</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="16" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Satisfiabilité</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>71</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="17" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Procédure décision</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>72</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="18" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Raisonnement équationnel</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>73</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="19" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>68P05</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>74</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="20" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Satisfiability problem</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>75</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="21" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>41A40</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>76</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="22" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>68T20</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>77</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21>
<s1>227</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01">
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82>
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Lorraine/explor/InforLorV4/Data/PascalFrancis/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000871 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000871 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Lorraine
   |area=    InforLorV4
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:11-0330330
   |texte=   Automatic decidability and combinability
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Mon Jun 10 21:56:28 2019. Site generation: Fri Feb 25 15:29:27 2022