Reading Affective Companionship in the Prose Lancelot
Identifieur interne : 000B83 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000B82; suivant : 000B84Reading Affective Companionship in the Prose Lancelot
Auteurs : Reginald HyatteSource :
- Neophilologus [ 0028-2677 ] ; 1999.
English descriptors
- Teeft :
- Affective, Affective companionship, Chivalric, Chivalric companionship, Compaignie, Companionship, Cyclic lancelot, Double marriage, Female character, First french romance, Galehout, Guinevere, Homoerotic, Homoerotic desire, Homosexual, Homosexuality, Hyatte, Lancelot, Literary fine, Male character, Mieszkowski, Polynices, Reginald, Romance, Romance convention, Sexual interest, Suicidal madness, Tristan, Tydeus.
Abstract
Abstract: In response to gay and queer criticism (Boswell, Burgwinkle, Mieszkowski, etc.), the article examines Lancelot and Galehout's affective compaignie and possible homoerotic desires in the Old French Lancelot (c. 1220) as a radical reinvention of romance conventions and types. Taking Le roman de Thèbes (c. 1150) as the main point of reference among several early romans, it argues that the signs of the companions' deep mutual affection in the Lancelot point to conventional romance postures and gestures that appear to have nothing to do with same-sex desire. Indeterminacy with respect to the companions' affection and desires is inherent in the narrative's atypical construction of gendered romance types. The article contends that readers must take into account the romance's ambiguous textuality, its relationship to other romance texts, as a factor contributing to the companions' problematic sexuality, which is not reducible to specifically homoerotic desires.
Url:
DOI: 10.1023/A:1004344102709
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:8C52163AB2E60424142754BAD3735F7F43C22EA0Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Reading Affective Companionship in the Prose Lancelot</title><author><name sortKey="Hyatte, Reginald" sort="Hyatte, Reginald" uniqKey="Hyatte R" first="Reginald" last="Hyatte">Reginald Hyatte</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Languages, The University of Tulsa, 74104, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:8C52163AB2E60424142754BAD3735F7F43C22EA0</idno><date when="1999" year="1999">1999</date><idno type="doi">10.1023/A:1004344102709</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/VQC-B550Z63P-K/fulltext.pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000B83</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000B83</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Reading Affective Companionship in the Prose Lancelot</title><author><name sortKey="Hyatte, Reginald" sort="Hyatte, Reginald" uniqKey="Hyatte R" first="Reginald" last="Hyatte">Reginald Hyatte</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Languages, The University of Tulsa, 74104, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Neophilologus</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Neophilologus</title><idno type="ISSN">0028-2677</idno><idno type="eISSN">1572-8668</idno><imprint><publisher>Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Dordrecht</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1999">1999</date><biblScope unit="vol" from="83" to="83">83</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue" from="1" to="1">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="19">19</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="32">32</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0028-2677</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0028-2677</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Affective</term><term>Affective companionship</term><term>Chivalric</term><term>Chivalric companionship</term><term>Compaignie</term><term>Companionship</term><term>Cyclic lancelot</term><term>Double marriage</term><term>Female character</term><term>First french romance</term><term>Galehout</term><term>Guinevere</term><term>Homoerotic</term><term>Homoerotic desire</term><term>Homosexual</term><term>Homosexuality</term><term>Hyatte</term><term>Lancelot</term><term>Literary fine</term><term>Male character</term><term>Mieszkowski</term><term>Polynices</term><term>Reginald</term><term>Romance</term><term>Romance convention</term><term>Sexual interest</term><term>Suicidal madness</term><term>Tristan</term><term>Tydeus</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: In response to gay and queer criticism (Boswell, Burgwinkle, Mieszkowski, etc.), the article examines Lancelot and Galehout's affective compaignie and possible homoerotic desires in the Old French Lancelot (c. 1220) as a radical reinvention of romance conventions and types. Taking Le roman de Thèbes (c. 1150) as the main point of reference among several early romans, it argues that the signs of the companions' deep mutual affection in the Lancelot point to conventional romance postures and gestures that appear to have nothing to do with same-sex desire. Indeterminacy with respect to the companions' affection and desires is inherent in the narrative's atypical construction of gendered romance types. The article contends that readers must take into account the romance's ambiguous textuality, its relationship to other romance texts, as a factor contributing to the companions' problematic sexuality, which is not reducible to specifically homoerotic desires.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>springer-journals</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>lancelot</json:string><json:string>galehout</json:string><json:string>compaignie</json:string><json:string>polynices</json:string><json:string>tydeus</json:string><json:string>homosexuality</json:string><json:string>guinevere</json:string><json:string>chivalric</json:string><json:string>hyatte</json:string><json:string>tristan</json:string><json:string>homoerotic</json:string><json:string>affective</json:string><json:string>mieszkowski</json:string><json:string>homoerotic desire</json:string><json:string>reginald</json:string><json:string>cyclic lancelot</json:string><json:string>male character</json:string><json:string>chivalric companionship</json:string><json:string>romance convention</json:string><json:string>suicidal madness</json:string><json:string>female character</json:string><json:string>literary fine</json:string><json:string>first french romance</json:string><json:string>affective companionship</json:string><json:string>double marriage</json:string><json:string>sexual interest</json:string><json:string>homosexual</json:string><json:string>companionship</json:string><json:string>romance</json:string><json:string>queer criticism</json:string><json:string>main point</json:string><json:string>several early roman</json:string><json:string>conventional romance posture</json:string><json:string>courtly love</json:string><json:string>heterosexual love</json:string><json:string>social tolerance</json:string><json:string>extreme grief</json:string><json:string>many respect</json:string><json:string>first encounter</json:string><json:string>king adrastus</json:string><json:string>french poet</json:string><json:string>important part</json:string><json:string>large part</json:string><json:string>romance stylization</json:string><json:string>puis vostre mort</json:string><json:string>lifelong fidelity</json:string><json:string>reginald hyatte</json:string><json:string>mutual homosexual attraction</json:string><json:string>mutual interaction</json:string><json:string>title character</json:string><json:string>medieval reader</json:string><json:string>prose tristan</json:string><json:string>chivalric compaignie</json:string><json:string>unique variation</json:string><json:string>gendered type</json:string><json:string>premodern europe</json:string><json:string>andreas capellanus</json:string><json:string>chicago press</json:string><json:string>amour courtois</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Reginald Hyatte</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Languages, The University of Tulsa, 74104, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>185518</json:string><json:string>Art2</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/VQC-B550Z63P-K</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>OriginalPaper</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Abstract: In response to gay and queer criticism (Boswell, Burgwinkle, Mieszkowski, etc.), the article examines Lancelot and Galehout's affective compaignie and possible homoerotic desires in the Old French Lancelot (c. 1220) as a radical reinvention of romance conventions and types. Taking Le roman de Thèbes (c. 1150) as the main point of reference among several early romans, it argues that the signs of the companions' deep mutual affection in the Lancelot point to conventional romance postures and gestures that appear to have nothing to do with same-sex desire. Indeterminacy with respect to the companions' affection and desires is inherent in the narrative's atypical construction of gendered romance types. The article contends that readers must take into account the romance's ambiguous textuality, its relationship to other romance texts, as a factor contributing to the companions' problematic sexuality, which is not reducible to specifically homoerotic desires.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.728</score><pdfWordCount>6122</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>36564</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>14</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595 x 842 pts (A4)</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>144</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>977</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>0</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Reading Affective Companionship in the Prose Lancelot</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Neophilologus</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><publicationDate>1999</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1999</copyrightDate><issn><json:string>0028-2677</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1572-8668</json:string></eissn><journalId><json:string>11061</json:string></journalId><volume>83</volume><issue>1</issue><pages><first>19</first><last>32</last></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Comparative Linguistics</value></json:item><json:item><value>Comparative Literature</value></json:item><json:item><value>Historical Linguistics</value></json:item><json:item><value>Philology</value></json:item><json:item><value>Syntax</value></json:item></subject></host><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/VQC-B550Z63P-K</json:string></ark><publicationDate>1999</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1999</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1023/A:1004344102709</json:string></doi><id>8C52163AB2E60424142754BAD3735F7F43C22EA0</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/VQC-B550Z63P-K/fulltext.pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/VQC-B550Z63P-K/bundle.zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/VQC-B550Z63P-K/fulltext.tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Reading Affective Companionship in the Prose Lancelot</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Dordrecht</pubPlace><availability><licence>Kluwer Academic Publishers</licence><p scheme="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-3XSW68JL-F">springer</p></availability><date type="published" when="1999">1999</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="OriginalPaper" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-5WTPMB5N-F">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Reading Affective Companionship in the Prose Lancelot</title><author><persName><forename type="first">Reginald</forename><surname>Hyatte</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName type="department">Department of Languages</orgName><orgName type="institution">The University of Tulsa</orgName><address><settlement>Tulsa</settlement><region>Oklahoma</region><postCode>74104</postCode><country key="US" xml:lang="en">UNITED STATES</country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">8C52163AB2E60424142754BAD3735F7F43C22EA0</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/VQC-B550Z63P-K</idno><idno type="publisher-id">Art2</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1023/A:1004344102709</idno><idno type="article-id">185518</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Neophilologus</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Neophilologus</title><idno type="journal-id">11061</idno><idno type="pISSN">0028-2677</idno><idno type="eISSN">1572-8668</idno><imprint><publisher>Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Dordrecht</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1999">1999</date><biblScope unit="vol" from="83" to="83">83</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue" from="1" to="1">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="19">19</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="32">32</biblScope></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><encodingDesc><schemaRef type="ODD" url="https://xml-schema.delivery.istex.fr/tei-istex.odd"></schemaRef><appInfo><application ident="pub2tei" version="1.0.48" when="2020-05-28"><label>pub2TEI-ISTEX</label><desc>A set of style sheets for converting XML documents encoded in various scientific publisher formats into a common TEI format.
<ref target="http://www.tei-c.org/">We use TEI</ref></desc></application></appInfo></encodingDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en"><head>Abstract</head><p>In response to gay and queer criticism (Boswell, Burgwinkle, Mieszkowski, etc.), the article examines Lancelot and Galehout's affective compaignie and possible homoerotic desires in the Old French Lancelot (c. 1220) as a radical reinvention of romance conventions and types. Taking Le roman de Thèbes (c. 1150) as the main point of reference among several early romans, it argues that the signs of the companions' deep mutual affection in the Lancelot point to conventional romance postures and gestures that appear to have nothing to do with same-sex desire. Indeterminacy with respect to the companions' affection and desires is inherent in the narrative's atypical construction of gendered romance types. The article contends that readers must take into account the romance's ambiguous textuality, its relationship to other romance texts, as a factor contributing to the companions' problematic sexuality, which is not reducible to specifically homoerotic desires.</p></abstract><textClass ana="subject"><keywords scheme="journal-subject"><list><item><term type="Primary">Linguistics</term></item><item><term type="Secondary">Comparative Linguistics</term></item><item><term type="Secondary">Comparative Literature</term></item><item><term type="Secondary">Historical Linguistics</term></item><item><term type="Secondary">Philology</term></item><item><term type="Secondary">Syntax</term></item></list></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2020-05-28" who="#istex" xml:id="pub2tei">formatting</change><change when="2004-09-30">Registration</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/VQC-B550Z63P-K/fulltext.txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="corpus springer-journals not found" wicri:toSee="no header"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//Springer-Verlag//DTD A++ V2.4//EN" URI="http://devel.springer.de/A++/V2.4/DTD/A++V2.4.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><Publisher><PublisherInfo><PublisherName>Kluwer Academic Publishers</PublisherName><PublisherLocation>Dordrecht</PublisherLocation></PublisherInfo><Journal><JournalInfo JournalProductType="ArchiveJournal" NumberingStyle="Unnumbered"><JournalID>11061</JournalID><JournalPrintISSN>0028-2677</JournalPrintISSN><JournalElectronicISSN>1572-8668</JournalElectronicISSN><JournalTitle>Neophilologus</JournalTitle><JournalSubTitle>An International Journal of Modern and Mediaeval Language and Literature</JournalSubTitle><JournalAbbreviatedTitle>Neophilologus</JournalAbbreviatedTitle><JournalSubjectGroup><JournalSubject Type="Primary">Linguistics</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Comparative Linguistics</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Comparative Literature</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Historical Linguistics</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Philology</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Syntax</JournalSubject></JournalSubjectGroup></JournalInfo><Volume><VolumeInfo VolumeType="Regular" TocLevels="0"><VolumeIDStart>83</VolumeIDStart><VolumeIDEnd>83</VolumeIDEnd><VolumeIssueCount>4</VolumeIssueCount></VolumeInfo><Issue IssueType="Regular"><IssueInfo TocLevels="0"><IssueIDStart>1</IssueIDStart><IssueIDEnd>1</IssueIDEnd><IssueArticleCount>12</IssueArticleCount><IssueHistory><CoverDate><Year>1999</Year><Month>1</Month></CoverDate></IssueHistory><IssueCopyright><CopyrightHolderName>Kluwer Academic Publishers</CopyrightHolderName><CopyrightYear>1999</CopyrightYear></IssueCopyright></IssueInfo><Article ID="Art2"><ArticleInfo Language="En" ArticleType="OriginalPaper" NumberingStyle="Unnumbered" TocLevels="0" ContainsESM="No"><ArticleID>185518</ArticleID><ArticleDOI>10.1023/A:1004344102709</ArticleDOI><ArticleSequenceNumber>2</ArticleSequenceNumber><ArticleTitle Language="En">Reading Affective Companionship in the Prose Lancelot</ArticleTitle><ArticleFirstPage>19</ArticleFirstPage><ArticleLastPage>32</ArticleLastPage><ArticleHistory><RegistrationDate><Year>2004</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>30</Day></RegistrationDate></ArticleHistory><ArticleCopyright><CopyrightHolderName>Kluwer Academic Publishers</CopyrightHolderName><CopyrightYear>1999</CopyrightYear></ArticleCopyright><ArticleGrants Type="Regular"><MetadataGrant Grant="OpenAccess"></MetadataGrant><AbstractGrant Grant="OpenAccess"></AbstractGrant><BodyPDFGrant Grant="Restricted"></BodyPDFGrant><BodyHTMLGrant Grant="Restricted"></BodyHTMLGrant><BibliographyGrant Grant="Restricted"></BibliographyGrant><ESMGrant Grant="Restricted"></ESMGrant></ArticleGrants><ArticleContext><JournalID>11061</JournalID><VolumeIDStart>83</VolumeIDStart><VolumeIDEnd>83</VolumeIDEnd><IssueIDStart>1</IssueIDStart><IssueIDEnd>1</IssueIDEnd></ArticleContext></ArticleInfo><ArticleHeader><AuthorGroup><Author AffiliationIDS="Aff1"><AuthorName DisplayOrder="Western"><GivenName>Reginald</GivenName><FamilyName>Hyatte</FamilyName></AuthorName></Author><Affiliation ID="Aff1"><OrgDivision>Department of Languages</OrgDivision><OrgName>The University of Tulsa</OrgName><OrgAddress><City>Tulsa</City><State>Oklahoma</State><Postcode>74104</Postcode><Country>USA</Country></OrgAddress></Affiliation></AuthorGroup><Abstract ID="Abs1" Language="En"><Heading>Abstract</Heading><Para>In response to gay and queer criticism (Boswell, Burgwinkle, Mieszkowski, etc.), the article examines Lancelot and Galehout's affective compaignie and possible homoerotic desires in the Old French Lancelot (c. 1220) as a radical reinvention of romance conventions and types. Taking Le roman de Thèbes (c. 1150) as the main point of reference among several early romans, it argues that the signs of the companions' deep mutual affection in the Lancelot point to conventional romance postures and gestures that appear to have nothing to do with same-sex desire. Indeterminacy with respect to the companions' affection and desires is inherent in the narrative's atypical construction of gendered romance types. The article contends that readers must take into account the romance's ambiguous textuality, its relationship to other romance texts, as a factor contributing to the companions' problematic sexuality, which is not reducible to specifically homoerotic desires.</Para></Abstract></ArticleHeader><NoBody></NoBody></Article></Issue></Volume></Journal></Publisher></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Reading Affective Companionship in the Prose Lancelot</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA"><title>Reading Affective Companionship in the Prose Lancelot</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Reginald</namePart><namePart type="family">Hyatte</namePart><affiliation>Department of Languages, The University of Tulsa, 74104, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="OriginalPaper" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Dordrecht</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1999-01-01</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1999</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><abstract lang="en">Abstract: In response to gay and queer criticism (Boswell, Burgwinkle, Mieszkowski, etc.), the article examines Lancelot and Galehout's affective compaignie and possible homoerotic desires in the Old French Lancelot (c. 1220) as a radical reinvention of romance conventions and types. Taking Le roman de Thèbes (c. 1150) as the main point of reference among several early romans, it argues that the signs of the companions' deep mutual affection in the Lancelot point to conventional romance postures and gestures that appear to have nothing to do with same-sex desire. Indeterminacy with respect to the companions' affection and desires is inherent in the narrative's atypical construction of gendered romance types. The article contends that readers must take into account the romance's ambiguous textuality, its relationship to other romance texts, as a factor contributing to the companions' problematic sexuality, which is not reducible to specifically homoerotic desires.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Neophilologus</title><subTitle>An International Journal of Modern and Mediaeval Language and Literature</subTitle></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Neophilologus</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><originInfo><publisher>Springer</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1999-01-01</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1999</copyrightDate></originInfo><subject><genre>Linguistics</genre><topic>Comparative Linguistics</topic><topic>Comparative Literature</topic><topic>Historical Linguistics</topic><topic>Philology</topic><topic>Syntax</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0028-2677</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1572-8668</identifier><identifier type="JournalID">11061</identifier><identifier type="IssueArticleCount">12</identifier><identifier type="VolumeIssueCount">4</identifier><part><date>1999</date><detail type="volume"><number>83</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="issue"><number>1</number><caption>no.</caption></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>19</start><end>32</end></extent></part><recordInfo><recordOrigin>Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999</recordOrigin></recordInfo></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">8C52163AB2E60424142754BAD3735F7F43C22EA0</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/VQC-B550Z63P-K</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1023/A:1004344102709</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">185518</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">Art2</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-3XSW68JL-F">springer</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Converted from (version 1.2.14) to MODS version 3.6.</recordOrigin><recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2020-05-29</recordCreationDate></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/VQC-B550Z63P-K/record.json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/ChansonRoland/explor/ChansonRolandV7/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000B83 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000B83 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= ChansonRoland
|area= ChansonRolandV7
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:8C52163AB2E60424142754BAD3735F7F43C22EA0
|texte= Reading Affective Companionship in the Prose Lancelot
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.39. |  |