NORMATIVE AND POSITIVE KNOWLEDGE IN POLITICAL ECONOMY NEW ANSWERS TO OLD QUESTIONS
Identifieur interne : 001B79 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001B78; suivant : 001B80NORMATIVE AND POSITIVE KNOWLEDGE IN POLITICAL ECONOMY NEW ANSWERS TO OLD QUESTIONS
Auteurs : Volker NienhausSource :
- Humanomics [ 0828-8666 ] ; 1990-03-01.
Abstract
1. Reason as the Source of Knowledge For medieval men, the existence of a personal and acting God was beyond any doubt. They were convinced that God intervenes into and interferes with the course of the world. The acting of God was a main factor for the explanation of natural phenomena. But with the passing of time, the understanding of nature improved and more and more phenomena could be explained by appeal to reason only and without recourse to actions of God. It became the general opinion that natural phenomena are subject to invariable natural laws. This clear departure from the Godrelated understanding of nature happened when modern philosophy emerged in the 17th and 18th century. This modern philosophy saw nature as a mechanic construction. One of the leading philosophers of that period, Rene Descartes, argued that the laws of mechanics are the laws of nature. Descartes, the founder of rationalistic philosophy, was no atheist, but when he referred to God, it was only to become sure that what is clear and rational is also true.
Url:
DOI: 10.1108/eb006107
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:CDCE4CA7CF91782CBED2A47FE15778EFD4991DC5Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">NORMATIVE AND POSITIVE KNOWLEDGE IN POLITICAL ECONOMY NEW ANSWERS TO OLD QUESTIONS</title><author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Nienhaus, Volker" sort="Nienhaus, Volker" uniqKey="Nienhaus V" first="Volker" last="Nienhaus">Volker Nienhaus</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Faculty of Economics, University of Bochum and University of Trier, F.R. of Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:CDCE4CA7CF91782CBED2A47FE15778EFD4991DC5</idno><date when="1990" year="1990">1990</date><idno type="doi">10.1108/eb006107</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/CDCE4CA7CF91782CBED2A47FE15778EFD4991DC5/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001B79</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001B79</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">NORMATIVE AND POSITIVE KNOWLEDGE IN POLITICAL ECONOMY NEW ANSWERS TO OLD QUESTIONS</title><author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Nienhaus, Volker" sort="Nienhaus, Volker" uniqKey="Nienhaus V" first="Volker" last="Nienhaus">Volker Nienhaus</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Faculty of Economics, University of Bochum and University of Trier, F.R. of Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Humanomics</title><idno type="ISSN">0828-8666</idno><imprint><publisher>MCB UP Ltd</publisher><date type="published" when="1990-03-01">1990-03-01</date><biblScope unit="volume">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="32">32</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="54">54</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0828-8666</idno></series><idno type="istex">CDCE4CA7CF91782CBED2A47FE15778EFD4991DC5</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1108/eb006107</idno><idno type="filenameID">1240060302</idno><idno type="original-pdf">1240060302.pdf</idno><idno type="href">eb006107.pdf</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0828-8666</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">1. Reason as the Source of Knowledge For medieval men, the existence of a personal and acting God was beyond any doubt. They were convinced that God intervenes into and interferes with the course of the world. The acting of God was a main factor for the explanation of natural phenomena. But with the passing of time, the understanding of nature improved and more and more phenomena could be explained by appeal to reason only and without recourse to actions of God. It became the general opinion that natural phenomena are subject to invariable natural laws. This clear departure from the Godrelated understanding of nature happened when modern philosophy emerged in the 17th and 18th century. This modern philosophy saw nature as a mechanic construction. One of the leading philosophers of that period, Rene Descartes, argued that the laws of mechanics are the laws of nature. Descartes, the founder of rationalistic philosophy, was no atheist, but when he referred to God, it was only to become sure that what is clear and rational is also true.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>emerald</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Volker Nienhaus</name><affiliations><json:string>Faculty of Economics, University of Bochum and University of Trier, F.R. of Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>review-article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>1. Reason as the Source of Knowledge For medieval men, the existence of a personal and acting God was beyond any doubt. They were convinced that God intervenes into and interferes with the course of the world. The acting of God was a main factor for the explanation of natural phenomena. But with the passing of time, the understanding of nature improved and more and more phenomena could be explained by appeal to reason only and without recourse to actions of God. It became the general opinion that natural phenomena are subject to invariable natural laws. This clear departure from the Godrelated understanding of nature happened when modern philosophy emerged in the 17th and 18th century. This modern philosophy saw nature as a mechanic construction. One of the leading philosophers of that period, Rene Descartes, argued that the laws of mechanics are the laws of nature. Descartes, the founder of rationalistic philosophy, was no atheist, but when he referred to God, it was only to become sure that what is clear and rational is also true.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>9.112</score><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>420 x 595.68 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><keywordCount>0</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>1048</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>7398</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>42281</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>23</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>176</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>NORMATIVE AND POSITIVE KNOWLEDGE IN POLITICAL ECONOMY NEW ANSWERS TO OLD QUESTIONS</title><refBibs><json:item><author><json:item><name>Mark Blaug</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>The Methodology of Economics Cambridge etc</title><publicationDate>1980</publicationDate></host><publicationDate>1980</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>James Buchanan</name></json:item><json:item><name>M </name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>The Limits of Liberty -Between Anarchy and Leviathan</title><publicationDate>1975</publicationDate></host><publicationDate>1975</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>James Buchanan</name></json:item><json:item><name>M </name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>Freedom in Constitutional Contract -Perspectives of a Political Economist. (College Station</title><publicationDate>1977</publicationDate></host><publicationDate>1977</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Bruce Caldwell</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>Beyond Positivism -Economic Methodology in the Twentieth Century</title><publicationDate>1982</publicationDate></host><publicationDate>1982</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><host><author><json:item><name>Gunter Dux</name></json:item></author><title>Die Logik der Weltbilder -Sinnstrukturen im Wandel der Geschichte</title><publicationDate>1982</publicationDate></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Friedrich Hayek</name></json:item><json:item><name>A </name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>277</last><first>266</first></pages><author></author><title>Stockholm</title><publicationDate>1975</publicationDate></host><title>The Pretence of Knowledge -Nobel Memorial Lecture, published in: Lex Prix Nobel en 1974</title><publicationDate>1975</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Friedrich Hayek</name></json:item><json:item><name>A </name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>330</last><first>318</first></pages><author></author><title>Science</title><publicationDate>1984</publicationDate></host><title>The Origins and Effects of Our Morals -A Problem for</title><publicationDate>1984</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Karl Homann</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>156</last><first>141</first></pages><author></author><title>Types of Rationality versus Theory of Rationality</title><publicationDate>1985</publicationDate></host><publicationDate>1985</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Karl Homann</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>240</last><first>215</first></pages><author></author><title>Die RoJIe okonomischer Uberlegungen in der Grundlegung der Ethik Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Wirtschaftsethik</title><publicationDate>1988</publicationDate></host><publicationDate>1988</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><host><author><json:item><name>Terence,W Hutchinson</name></json:item></author><title>Positive Economics and Policy Objectives</title><publicationDate>1964</publicationDate></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Volker Nienhaus</name></json:item></author><host><volume>4</volume><pages><last>65</last><first>27</first></pages><issue>3-4].</issue><author></author><title>Restatements of Normative Economics -Western Approaches and Islamic Perspectives Policy-Theoretic Foundations of Ethico-Economics. [= Humanomics</title><publicationDate>1988</publicationDate></host><publicationDate>1988</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Chiaki Nishiyama</name></json:item><json:item><name>Kurt,R Leube</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>The Essence of Hayek. (Stanford</title><publicationDate>1984</publicationDate></host><publicationDate>1984</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Robert Nozick</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>Anarchy, State, and Utopia</title><publicationDate>1974</publicationDate></host><publicationDate>1974</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><host><author><json:item><name>Karl,R Popper</name></json:item></author><title>The Open Society and Its Enemies</title><publicationDate>1966</publicationDate></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>John Rawls</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>A Theory of Justice</title><publicationDate>1971</publicationDate></host><publicationDate>1971</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Murray Rothbard</name></json:item><json:item><name>N </name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>The Ethics of Liberty</title><publicationDate>1982</publicationDate></host><publicationDate>1982</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><host><author><json:item><name>Charles ; Rowley</name></json:item><json:item><name>Allan,T Peacock</name></json:item></author><title>Welfare Economics -A Liberal Restatement</title><publicationDate>1975</publicationDate></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Amartya Sen</name></json:item><json:item><name>K Edinburgh</name></json:item><json:item><name>Oliver& Boyd</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>Collective Choices and Social Welfare</title><publicationDate>1970</publicationDate></host><publicationDate>1970</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Thomas Sowell</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>Knowledge and Decision</title><publicationDate>1980</publicationDate></host><publicationDate>1980</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Max,Max Weber</name></json:item><json:item><name> Weber</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>88</last><first>48</first></pages><author></author><title>The Methodology of the Social Sciences Logos</title><publicationDate>1917</publicationDate></host><title>The Meaning of Ethical Neutrality in Sociology [ = translation of: Der Sinn der 'Wertfreiheit' der soziologischen und okonomischen Wissenschaften</title><publicationDate>1917</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><host><author><json:item><name>Artur Woll</name></json:item></author><publicationDate>1984</publicationDate></host></json:item></refBibs><genre><json:string>review-article</json:string></genre><host><volume>6</volume><publisherId><json:string>h</json:string></publisherId><pages><last>54</last><first>32</first></pages><issn><json:string>0828-8666</json:string></issn><issue>3</issue><subject><json:item><value>Economics</value></json:item><json:item><value>Social economics</value></json:item></subject><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><title>Humanomics</title><doi><json:string>10.1108/h</json:string></doi></host><categories><inist><json:string>sciences humaines et sociales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>1990</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1990</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1108/eb006107</json:string></doi><id>CDCE4CA7CF91782CBED2A47FE15778EFD4991DC5</id><score>0.93434733</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/CDCE4CA7CF91782CBED2A47FE15778EFD4991DC5/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/CDCE4CA7CF91782CBED2A47FE15778EFD4991DC5/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/CDCE4CA7CF91782CBED2A47FE15778EFD4991DC5/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">NORMATIVE AND POSITIVE KNOWLEDGE IN POLITICAL ECONOMY NEW ANSWERS TO OLD QUESTIONS</title><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>MCB UP Ltd</publisher><availability><p>© MCB UP Limited</p></availability><date>1990</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">NORMATIVE AND POSITIVE KNOWLEDGE IN POLITICAL ECONOMY NEW ANSWERS TO OLD QUESTIONS</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Volker</forename><surname>Nienhaus</surname></persName><affiliation>Faculty of Economics, University of Bochum and University of Trier, F.R. of Germany</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Humanomics</title><idno type="pISSN">0828-8666</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1108/h</idno><imprint><publisher>MCB UP Ltd</publisher><date type="published" when="1990-03-01"></date><biblScope unit="volume">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="32">32</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="54">54</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">CDCE4CA7CF91782CBED2A47FE15778EFD4991DC5</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1108/eb006107</idno><idno type="filenameID">1240060302</idno><idno type="original-pdf">1240060302.pdf</idno><idno type="href">eb006107.pdf</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1990</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>1. Reason as the Source of Knowledge For medieval men, the existence of a personal and acting God was beyond any doubt. They were convinced that God intervenes into and interferes with the course of the world. The acting of God was a main factor for the explanation of natural phenomena. But with the passing of time, the understanding of nature improved and more and more phenomena could be explained by appeal to reason only and without recourse to actions of God. It became the general opinion that natural phenomena are subject to invariable natural laws. This clear departure from the Godrelated understanding of nature happened when modern philosophy emerged in the 17th and 18th century. This modern philosophy saw nature as a mechanic construction. One of the leading philosophers of that period, Rene Descartes, argued that the laws of mechanics are the laws of nature. Descartes, the founder of rationalistic philosophy, was no atheist, but when he referred to God, it was only to become sure that what is clear and rational is also true.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="Emerald Subject Group"><list><label>cat-ECO</label><label>cat-SECO</label><item><term>Economics</term></item><item><term>Social economics</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1990-03-01">Published</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2017-01-18">References added</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/CDCE4CA7CF91782CBED2A47FE15778EFD4991DC5/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="corpus emerald not found" wicri:toSee="no header"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><!-- Auto generated NISO JATS XML created by Atypon out of MCB DTD source files. Do Not Edit! --><article dtd-version="1.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="review-article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">h</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="doi">10.1108/h</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Humanomics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0828-8666</issn><publisher><publisher-name>MCB UP Ltd</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/eb006107</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="original-pdf">1240060302.pdf</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="filename">1240060302</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="type-of-publication"><compound-subject><compound-subject-part content-type="code">review-article</compound-subject-part><compound-subject-part content-type="label">General review</compound-subject-part></compound-subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="subject"><compound-subject><compound-subject-part content-type="code">cat-ECO</compound-subject-part><compound-subject-part content-type="label">Economics</compound-subject-part></compound-subject><subj-group><compound-subject><compound-subject-part content-type="code">cat-SECO</compound-subject-part><compound-subject-part content-type="label">Social economics</compound-subject-part></compound-subject></subj-group></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>NORMATIVE AND POSITIVE KNOWLEDGE IN POLITICAL ECONOMY: NEW ANSWERS TO OLD QUESTIONS?</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><string-name><given-names>Volker</given-names> <surname>Nienhaus</surname></string-name><aff>Faculty of Economics, University of Bochum and University of Trier, F.R. of Germany</aff></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><day>1</day><month>3</month><year>1990</year></pub-date><volume>6</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>32</fpage><lpage>54</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>© MCB UP Limited</copyright-statement><copyright-year>1990</copyright-year><license license-type="publisher"><license-p></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="eb006107.pdf"></self-uri><abstract><p><bold>1. Reason as the Source of Knowledge</bold> For medieval men, the existence of a personal and acting God was beyond any doubt. They were convinced that God intervenes into and interferes with the course of the world. The acting of God was a main factor for the explanation of natural phenomena. But with the passing of time, the understanding of nature improved and more and more phenomena could be explained by appeal to reason only and without recourse to actions of God. It became the general opinion that natural phenomena are subject to invariable natural laws. This clear departure from the God‐related understanding of nature happened when modern philosophy emerged in the 17th and 18th century. This modern philosophy saw nature as a mechanic construction. One of the leading philosophers of that period, Rene Descartes, argued that the laws of mechanics are the laws of nature. Descartes, the founder of rationalistic philosophy, was no atheist, but when he referred to God, it was only to become sure that what is clear (and rational) is also true.</p></abstract><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>peer-reviewed</meta-name><meta-value>no</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>academic-content</meta-name><meta-value>yes</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>rightslink</meta-name><meta-value>included</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front></article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>NORMATIVE AND POSITIVE KNOWLEDGE IN POLITICAL ECONOMY NEW ANSWERS TO OLD QUESTIONS</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" lang="en" contentType="CDATA"><title>NORMATIVE AND POSITIVE KNOWLEDGE IN POLITICAL ECONOMY NEW ANSWERS TO OLD QUESTIONS</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Volker</namePart><namePart type="family">Nienhaus</namePart><affiliation>Faculty of Economics, University of Bochum and University of Trier, F.R. of Germany</affiliation></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="review-article" displayLabel="review-article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>MCB UP Ltd</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1990-03-01</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1990</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">1. Reason as the Source of Knowledge For medieval men, the existence of a personal and acting God was beyond any doubt. They were convinced that God intervenes into and interferes with the course of the world. The acting of God was a main factor for the explanation of natural phenomena. But with the passing of time, the understanding of nature improved and more and more phenomena could be explained by appeal to reason only and without recourse to actions of God. It became the general opinion that natural phenomena are subject to invariable natural laws. This clear departure from the Godrelated understanding of nature happened when modern philosophy emerged in the 17th and 18th century. This modern philosophy saw nature as a mechanic construction. One of the leading philosophers of that period, Rene Descartes, argued that the laws of mechanics are the laws of nature. Descartes, the founder of rationalistic philosophy, was no atheist, but when he referred to God, it was only to become sure that what is clear and rational is also true.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Humanomics</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><subject><genre>Emerald Subject Group</genre><topic authority="SubjectCodesPrimary" authorityURI="cat-ECO">Economics</topic><topic authority="SubjectCodesSecondary" authorityURI="cat-SECO">Social economics</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0828-8666</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">h</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1108/h</identifier><part><date>1990</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>6</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>3</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>32</start><end>54</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">CDCE4CA7CF91782CBED2A47FE15778EFD4991DC5</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1108/eb006107</identifier><identifier type="filenameID">1240060302</identifier><identifier type="original-pdf">1240060302.pdf</identifier><identifier type="href">eb006107.pdf</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© MCB UP Limited</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>EMERALD</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001B79 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001B79 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Rhénanie
|area= UnivTrevesV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:CDCE4CA7CF91782CBED2A47FE15778EFD4991DC5
|texte= NORMATIVE AND POSITIVE KNOWLEDGE IN POLITICAL ECONOMY NEW ANSWERS TO OLD QUESTIONS
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |