Do you feel better or worse? The validity of perceived deviations of mood states from mood traits
Identifieur interne : 001A28 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001A27; suivant : 001A29Do you feel better or worse? The validity of perceived deviations of mood states from mood traits
Auteurs : Michael Eid ; Christoph Schneider ; Peter SchwenkmezgerSource :
- European Journal of Personality [ 0890-2070 ] ; 1999-07.
Abstract
The advantages of assessing self‐perceived deviations of mood states from mood traits in cross‐sectional as well as longitudinal studies are discussed in detail. The validity of self‐perceived mood deviations is analysed in a longitudinal study with three occasions of measurement and 176 participants. In order to assess self‐perceived mood deviations, participants rated the deviation of their momentary mood from how they felt in general with respect to 32 mood adjectives belonging to three mood scales (pleasant–unpleasant, calm–restless, awake–sleepy). Furthermore, mood states, mood traits, and other personality variables (hedonic level, neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness, conscientiousness) are assessed by self‐report. Using models of latent state–trait theory, it is shown that the self‐perceived mood deviation scales are reliable (reliabilities between 0.73 and 0.95) and sensitive to occasion‐specific fluctuations (occasion specificities between 0.38 and 0.72). The self‐perceived deviation scales show high correlations with latent occasion‐specific deviation variables defined on the basis of repeatedly measured mood states (high convergent validity). In contrast to self‐reported mood states, however, self‐perceived mood deviations show much smaller and in most cases non‐significant correlations with personality variables (high discriminant validity). Furthermore, it is shown that self‐perceived mood deviations can be used to suppress stable situation‐specific variance in mood traits defined as aggregated states. Therefore, it can be demonstrated that including self‐perceived mood deviations in analyses on mood–personality associations enhances the association coefficients considerably. Finally, the implications of the results for the individual assessment of mood deviations, as well as for studies on affect and personality, are discussed. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Url:
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199907/08)13:4<283::AID-PER341>3.0.CO;2-0
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:0F2C9032AB5F37F0E00EF59B32620A3A4BB33A5ALe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Do you feel better or worse? The validity of perceived deviations of mood states from mood traits</title><author><name sortKey="Eid, Michael" sort="Eid, Michael" uniqKey="Eid M" first="Michael" last="Eid">Michael Eid</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>FBI—Psychologie, Universität Trier, D‐54286 Trier, Germany.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schneider, Christoph" sort="Schneider, Christoph" uniqKey="Schneider C" first="Christoph" last="Schneider">Christoph Schneider</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schwenkmezger, Peter" sort="Schwenkmezger, Peter" uniqKey="Schwenkmezger P" first="Peter" last="Schwenkmezger">Peter Schwenkmezger</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:0F2C9032AB5F37F0E00EF59B32620A3A4BB33A5A</idno><date when="1999" year="1999">1999</date><idno type="doi">10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199907/08)13:4<283::AID-PER341>3.0.CO;2-0</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/0F2C9032AB5F37F0E00EF59B32620A3A4BB33A5A/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001A28</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001A28</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Do you feel better or worse? The validity of perceived deviations of mood states from mood traits</title><author><name sortKey="Eid, Michael" sort="Eid, Michael" uniqKey="Eid M" first="Michael" last="Eid">Michael Eid</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>FBI—Psychologie, Universität Trier, D‐54286 Trier, Germany.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schneider, Christoph" sort="Schneider, Christoph" uniqKey="Schneider C" first="Christoph" last="Schneider">Christoph Schneider</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schwenkmezger, Peter" sort="Schwenkmezger, Peter" uniqKey="Schwenkmezger P" first="Peter" last="Schwenkmezger">Peter Schwenkmezger</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">European Journal of Personality</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Eur. J. Pers.</title><idno type="ISSN">0890-2070</idno><idno type="eISSN">1099-0984</idno><imprint><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1999-07">1999-07</date><biblScope unit="volume">13</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="283">283</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="306">306</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0890-2070</idno></series><idno type="istex">0F2C9032AB5F37F0E00EF59B32620A3A4BB33A5A</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199907/08)13:4<283::AID-PER341>3.0.CO;2-0</idno><idno type="ArticleID">PER341</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0890-2070</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The advantages of assessing self‐perceived deviations of mood states from mood traits in cross‐sectional as well as longitudinal studies are discussed in detail. The validity of self‐perceived mood deviations is analysed in a longitudinal study with three occasions of measurement and 176 participants. In order to assess self‐perceived mood deviations, participants rated the deviation of their momentary mood from how they felt in general with respect to 32 mood adjectives belonging to three mood scales (pleasant–unpleasant, calm–restless, awake–sleepy). Furthermore, mood states, mood traits, and other personality variables (hedonic level, neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness, conscientiousness) are assessed by self‐report. Using models of latent state–trait theory, it is shown that the self‐perceived mood deviation scales are reliable (reliabilities between 0.73 and 0.95) and sensitive to occasion‐specific fluctuations (occasion specificities between 0.38 and 0.72). The self‐perceived deviation scales show high correlations with latent occasion‐specific deviation variables defined on the basis of repeatedly measured mood states (high convergent validity). In contrast to self‐reported mood states, however, self‐perceived mood deviations show much smaller and in most cases non‐significant correlations with personality variables (high discriminant validity). Furthermore, it is shown that self‐perceived mood deviations can be used to suppress stable situation‐specific variance in mood traits defined as aggregated states. Therefore, it can be demonstrated that including self‐perceived mood deviations in analyses on mood–personality associations enhances the association coefficients considerably. Finally, the implications of the results for the individual assessment of mood deviations, as well as for studies on affect and personality, are discussed. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Michael Eid</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Trier, Germany</json:string><json:string>FBI—Psychologie, Universität Trier, D‐54286 Trier, Germany.</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Christoph Schneider</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Trier, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Peter Schwenkmezger</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Trier, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>PER341</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>The advantages of assessing self‐perceived deviations of mood states from mood traits in cross‐sectional as well as longitudinal studies are discussed in detail. The validity of self‐perceived mood deviations is analysed in a longitudinal study with three occasions of measurement and 176 participants. In order to assess self‐perceived mood deviations, participants rated the deviation of their momentary mood from how they felt in general with respect to 32 mood adjectives belonging to three mood scales (pleasant–unpleasant, calm–restless, awake–sleepy). Furthermore, mood states, mood traits, and other personality variables (hedonic level, neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness, conscientiousness) are assessed by self‐report. Using models of latent state–trait theory, it is shown that the self‐perceived mood deviation scales are reliable (reliabilities between 0.73 and 0.95) and sensitive to occasion‐specific fluctuations (occasion specificities between 0.38 and 0.72). The self‐perceived deviation scales show high correlations with latent occasion‐specific deviation variables defined on the basis of repeatedly measured mood states (high convergent validity). In contrast to self‐reported mood states, however, self‐perceived mood deviations show much smaller and in most cases non‐significant correlations with personality variables (high discriminant validity). Furthermore, it is shown that self‐perceived mood deviations can be used to suppress stable situation‐specific variance in mood traits defined as aggregated states. Therefore, it can be demonstrated that including self‐perceived mood deviations in analyses on mood–personality associations enhances the association coefficients considerably. Finally, the implications of the results for the individual assessment of mood deviations, as well as for studies on affect and personality, are discussed. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8</score><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>465 x 703 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>1929</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>9856</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>62398</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>24</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>255</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Do you feel better or worse? The validity of perceived deviations of mood states from mood traits</title><refBibs><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Amelang</name></json:item><json:item><name>K. Eisenhut</name></json:item><json:item><name>H. Rindermann</name></json:item></author><host><volume>12</volume><pages><last>533</last><first>523</first></pages><author></author><title>Personality and Individual Differences</title></host><title>Responding to adjective check list items: a reaction time analysis</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>V. Bereiter</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>21</last><first>3</first></pages><author></author><title>Problems in Measuring Change</title></host><title>Some persisting dilemmas in the measurement of change</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G. Bohner</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. Hormuth</name></json:item><json:item><name>N. Schwarz</name></json:item></author><host><volume>2</volume><pages><last>148</last><first>135</first></pages><author></author><title>Diagnostica</title></host><title>Die Stimmungs‐Skala: Vorstellung und Validierung einer deutschen Version des “Mood Survey”</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>NEO‐Fünf‐Faktoren‐Inventar (NEO‐FFI)</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Cattell, R. B. and Scheier, I. H. (1961). The Meaning and Measurement of Neuroticism and Anxiety, Ronald, New York.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>The NEO‐PI/NEO‐FFI Manual Supplement</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>E. Diener</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. A. Emmons</name></json:item></author><host><volume>47</volume><pages><last>1117</last><first>1105</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>The independence of positive and negative affect</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>E. Diener</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. J. Larsen</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>415</last><first>405</first></pages><author></author><title>Handbook of Emotions</title></host><title>The experience of emotional well‐being</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>E. Diener</name></json:item><json:item><name>H. Smith</name></json:item><json:item><name>F. Fujita</name></json:item></author><host><volume>69</volume><pages><last>141</last><first>130</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>The personality structure of affect</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Eid, M. (1996). ‘Longitudinal confirmatory factor analysis for polytomous item responses: model definition and model selection on the basis of stochastic measurement theory’, Methods of Psychological Research Online http://www.hsp.de/MPR, 1, 65–85.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Eid</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>154</last><first>148</first></pages><author></author><title>Applications of Latent Trait and Latent Class Models in the Social Sciences</title></host><title>Happiness and satisfaction: an application of a latent state–trait model for ordinal variables</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Eid</name></json:item><json:item><name>L. Hoffmann</name></json:item></author><host><volume>23</volume><pages><last>193</last><first>171</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics</title></host><title>Measuring variability and change with an item response model for polytomous variables</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Eid</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. Notz</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Steyer</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. Schwenkmezger</name></json:item></author><host><volume>16</volume><pages><last>76</last><first>63</first></pages><author></author><title>Personality and Individual Differences</title></host><title>Validating scales for the assessment of mood level and variability by latent state–trait analyses</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C. F. Emery</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. A. Blumenthal</name></json:item></author><host><volume>30</volume><pages><last>521</last><first>516</first></pages><author></author><title>Gerontologist</title></host><title>Perceived change among participants in an exercise program for older adults</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. A. Emmons</name></json:item><json:item><name>E. Diener</name></json:item></author><host><volume>11</volume><pages><last>97</last><first>89</first></pages><author></author><title>Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin</title></host><title>Personality correlates of subjective well‐being</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S. Epstein</name></json:item></author><host><volume>43</volume><pages><last>1126</last><first>1097</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>The stability of behavior: I. On predicting most of the people much of the time</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>N. H. Frijda</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>67</last><first>59</first></pages><author></author><title>The Nature of Emotion. Fundamental Questions</title></host><title>Varieties of affect: emotions and episodes, moods, and sentiments</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L. S. Greenberg</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. S. James</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. F. Conry</name></json:item></author><host><volume>2</volume><pages><last>23</last><first>5</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Family Psychology</title></host><title>Perceived change processes in emotionally focused couples therapy</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A. Handel</name></json:item></author><host><volume>9</volume><pages><last>519</last><first>507</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Youth and Adolescence</title></host><title>Perceived change of self among adolescents</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>E. S. Herold</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. E. Thomas</name></json:item></author><host><volume>41</volume><pages><last>707</last><first>701</first></pages><author></author><title>Educational and Psychological Measurement</title></host><title>Perceived versus computed change: can perceived measures tell us something that computed measures cannot?</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Jöreskog, K. G. and Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8. A Guide to the Program and its Applications, SPSS, Chicago, IL.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. Lazarus</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>85</last><first>79</first></pages><author></author><title>The Nature of Emotion. Fundamental Questions</title></host><title>The stable and the unstable in emotion</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Lorr</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>53</last><first>37</first></pages><author></author><title>Emotion. Theory, Research, and Experience (The Measurement of Emotions 4)</title></host><title>Models and methods for measurement of mood</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C. J. Mackay</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>562</last><first>501</first></pages><author></author><title>Techniques in Psychophysiology</title></host><title>The measurement of mood and psychophysiological activity using self‐report techniques</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>H. W. Marsh</name></json:item><json:item><name>D. Grayson</name></json:item></author><host><volume>1</volume><pages><last>145</last><first>116</first></pages><author></author><title>Structural Equation Modeling</title></host><title>Longitudinal confirmatory factor analysis: common, time‐specific, item‐specific, and residual‐error components of variance</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Myers, D. G. (1992). The Pursuit of Happiness: Who is Happy—and Why?, Morrow, New York.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D. G. Myers</name></json:item><json:item><name>E. Diener</name></json:item></author><host><volume>6</volume><pages><last>19</last><first>10</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychological Sciences</title></host><title>Who is happy?</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>U. Olsson</name></json:item></author><host><volume>14</volume><pages><last>500</last><first>485</first></pages><author></author><title>Multivariate Behavioral Research</title></host><title>On the robustness of factor analysis against crude classification of the observations</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B. Parkinson</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. B. Briner</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. Reynolds</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. Totterdell</name></json:item></author><host><volume>21</volume><pages><last>339</last><first>331</first></pages><author></author><title>Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin</title></host><title>Time frames for mood: relations between momentary and generalized ratings of affect</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D. Rogosa</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>209</last><first>171</first></pages><author></author><title>Methodological Issues in Aging Research</title></host><title>Myths about longitudinal researc</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. A. Russell</name></json:item></author><host><volume>37</volume><pages><last>356</last><first>345</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Affective space is bipolar</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>K. W. Schaie</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. L. Willis</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. M. O'Hanlon</name></json:item></author><host><volume>49</volume><pages><last>118</last><first>108</first></pages><author></author><title>Journals of Gerontology</title></host><title>Perceived intellectual performance change over seven years</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C. D. Spielberger</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>183</last><first>173</first></pages><author></author><title>Personality at the Crossroads: Current Issues in Interactional Psychology</title></host><title>State–trait anxiety and interactional psychology</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. Steyer</name></json:item></author><host><volume>2</volume><pages><last>78</last><first>53</first></pages><author></author><title>Methodika</title></host><title>Conditional expectations: an introduction to the concept and its applications in empirical sciences</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. Steyer</name></json:item><json:item><name>D. Ferring</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Schmitt</name></json:item></author><host><volume>2</volume><pages><last>98</last><first>79</first></pages><author></author><title>European Journal of Psychological Assessment</title></host><title>States and traits in psychological assessment</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. Steyer</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. Schwenkmezger</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. Notz</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Eid</name></json:item></author><host><volume>40</volume><pages><last>328</last><first>320</first></pages><author></author><title>Diagnostica</title></host><title>Testtheoretische Analysen des Mehrdimensionalen Befindlichkeitsfragebogens (MDBF)</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A. Stone</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>171</last><first>148</first></pages><author></author><title>Measuring Stress: a Guide for Health and Social Scientists</title></host><title>Measurement of affective response</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>E. Svensson</name></json:item></author><host><volume>18</volume><pages><last>78</last><first>71</first></pages><author></author><title>Scandinavian Journal of Psychology</title></host><title>Response format and factor structure in mood adjective check lists</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Thayer, R. E. (1996). The Origin of Everyday Moods. Managing Energy, Tension, and Stress, Oxford University Press, New York.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L. E. Troll</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. M. Skaff</name></json:item></author><host><volume>12</volume><pages><last>169</last><first>162</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychology and Aging</title></host><title>Perceived continuity of self in very old age</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. Tzelgov</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Henik</name></json:item></author><host><volume>45</volume><pages><last>284</last><first>281</first></pages><author></author><title>Educational and Psychological Measurement</title></host><title>A definition of suppression situations for the general linear model: a regression weights approach</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B. Underwood</name></json:item><json:item><name>W. J. Froming</name></json:item></author><host><volume>44</volume><pages><last>414</last><first>404</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality Assessment</title></host><title>The mood survey: a personality measure of happy and sad moods</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D. Watson</name></json:item></author><host><volume>55</volume><pages><last>141</last><first>128</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>The vicissitudes of mood measurements: effects of varying descriptors, time frames, and response formats on measures of positive and negative affect</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D. Watson</name></json:item><json:item><name>L. A. Clark</name></json:item></author><host><volume>60</volume><pages><last>476</last><first>441</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality</title></host><title>On traits and temperament: general and specific factors of emotional experience and their relation to the five‐factor model</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D. Watson</name></json:item><json:item><name>L. A. Clark</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>405</last><first>400</first></pages><author></author><title>The Nature of Emotion. Fundamental Questions</title></host><title>The vicissitudes of mood: a schematic model</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D. Watson</name></json:item><json:item><name>L. A. Clark</name></json:item></author><host><volume>68</volume><pages><last>296</last><first>267</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality Assessment</title></host><title>Measurement and mismeasurement of mood: recurrent and emergent issues</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D. Watson</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Tellegen</name></json:item></author><host><volume>98</volume><pages><last>235</last><first>219</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychological Bulletin</title></host><title>Toward a consensual structure of mood</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S. G. West</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. F. Finch</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. J. Curran</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>75</last><first>56</first></pages><author></author><title>Structural Equation Modeling. Concepts, Issues, and Applications</title></host><title>Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: problems and remedies</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Wiggins, J. S. (1973). Personality and Prediction: Principles of Personality Assessment, Addison‐Wesley, Reading, MA.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Zuckerman</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>174</last><first>133</first></pages><author></author><title>Emotions and Anxiety. New Concepts, Methods, and Applications</title></host><title>General and situation‐specific traits and states: new approaches to assessment of anxiety and other constructs</title></json:item></refBibs><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>13</volume><publisherId><json:string>PER</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>24</total><last>306</last><first>283</first></pages><issn><json:string>0890-2070</json:string></issn><issue>4</issue><subject><json:item><value>Research Article</value></json:item></subject><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1099-0984</json:string></eissn><title>European Journal of Personality</title><doi><json:string>10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0984</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>social science</json:string><json:string>psychology, social</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>health sciences</json:string><json:string>psychology & cognitive sciences</json:string><json:string>social psychology</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>1999</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1999</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199907/08)13:4>283::AID-PER341>3.0.CO;2-0</json:string></doi><id>0F2C9032AB5F37F0E00EF59B32620A3A4BB33A5A</id><score>2.0236373</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0F2C9032AB5F37F0E00EF59B32620A3A4BB33A5A/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0F2C9032AB5F37F0E00EF59B32620A3A4BB33A5A/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/0F2C9032AB5F37F0E00EF59B32620A3A4BB33A5A/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Do you feel better or worse? The validity of perceived deviations of mood states from mood traits</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p></availability><date>1999</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Do you feel better or worse? The validity of perceived deviations of mood states from mood traits</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Michael</forename><surname>Eid</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Trier, Germany</affiliation><affiliation>FBI—Psychologie, Universität Trier, D‐54286 Trier, Germany.</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">Christoph</forename><surname>Schneider</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Trier, Germany</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-3"><persName><forename type="first">Peter</forename><surname>Schwenkmezger</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Trier, Germany</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">European Journal of Personality</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Eur. J. Pers.</title><idno type="pISSN">0890-2070</idno><idno type="eISSN">1099-0984</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0984</idno><imprint><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1999-07"></date><biblScope unit="volume">13</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="283">283</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="306">306</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">0F2C9032AB5F37F0E00EF59B32620A3A4BB33A5A</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199907/08)13:4<283::AID-PER341>3.0.CO;2-0</idno><idno type="ArticleID">PER341</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1999</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The advantages of assessing self‐perceived deviations of mood states from mood traits in cross‐sectional as well as longitudinal studies are discussed in detail. The validity of self‐perceived mood deviations is analysed in a longitudinal study with three occasions of measurement and 176 participants. In order to assess self‐perceived mood deviations, participants rated the deviation of their momentary mood from how they felt in general with respect to 32 mood adjectives belonging to three mood scales (pleasant–unpleasant, calm–restless, awake–sleepy). Furthermore, mood states, mood traits, and other personality variables (hedonic level, neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness, conscientiousness) are assessed by self‐report. Using models of latent state–trait theory, it is shown that the self‐perceived mood deviation scales are reliable (reliabilities between 0.73 and 0.95) and sensitive to occasion‐specific fluctuations (occasion specificities between 0.38 and 0.72). The self‐perceived deviation scales show high correlations with latent occasion‐specific deviation variables defined on the basis of repeatedly measured mood states (high convergent validity). In contrast to self‐reported mood states, however, self‐perceived mood deviations show much smaller and in most cases non‐significant correlations with personality variables (high discriminant validity). Furthermore, it is shown that self‐perceived mood deviations can be used to suppress stable situation‐specific variance in mood traits defined as aggregated states. Therefore, it can be demonstrated that including self‐perceived mood deviations in analyses on mood–personality associations enhances the association coefficients considerably. Finally, the implications of the results for the individual assessment of mood deviations, as well as for studies on affect and personality, are discussed. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="Journal Subject"><list><head>article-category</head><item><term>Research Article</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1998-06-02">Received</change><change when="1998-10-01">Registration</change><change when="1999-07">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0F2C9032AB5F37F0E00EF59B32620A3A4BB33A5A/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisherName><publisherLoc>Chichester, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi registered="yes">10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0984</doi><issn type="print">0890-2070</issn><issn type="electronic">1099-0984</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="PER"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" xml:lang="en" sort="EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY">European Journal of Personality</title><title type="short">Eur. J. Pers.</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="40"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199907/08)13:4<>1.0.CO;2-5</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="13">13</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">4</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="1999-07">July/August 1999</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="3" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199907/08)13:4<283::AID-PER341>3.0.CO;2-0</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="PER341"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="24"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Research Article</title><title type="tocHeading1">Research Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="manuscriptReceived" date="1998-06-02"></event><event type="manuscriptAccepted" date="1998-10-01"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="1999-08-18"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="1999-08-18"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:JWSART34_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-03-06"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-02-06"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">283</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">306</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>FBI—Psychologie, Universität Trier, D‐54286 Trier, Germany.</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:PER.PER341.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="6"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="4"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="50"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" xml:lang="en">Do you feel better or worse? The validity of perceived deviations of mood states from mood traits</title><title type="short" xml:lang="en">Do you feel better or worse?</title></titleGroup><creators><creator xml:id="au1" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Michael</givenNames><familyName>Eid</familyName></personName><contactDetails><email normalForm="eid@uni-trier.de">eid@uni‐trier.de</email></contactDetails></creator><creator xml:id="au2" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af1"><personName><givenNames>Christoph</givenNames><familyName>Schneider</familyName></personName></creator><creator xml:id="au3" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af1"><personName><givenNames>Peter</givenNames><familyName>Schwenkmezger</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="af1" countryCode="DE" type="organization"><unparsedAffiliation>University of Trier, Germany</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p>The advantages of assessing self‐perceived deviations of mood states from mood traits in cross‐sectional as well as longitudinal studies are discussed in detail. The validity of self‐perceived mood deviations is analysed in a longitudinal study with three occasions of measurement and 176 participants. In order to assess self‐perceived mood deviations, participants rated the deviation of their momentary mood from how they felt in general with respect to 32 mood adjectives belonging to three mood scales (<i>pleasant–unpleasant, calm–restless, awake–sleepy</i>). Furthermore, mood states, mood traits, and other personality variables (hedonic level, neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness, conscientiousness) are assessed by self‐report. Using models of latent state–trait theory, it is shown that the self‐perceived mood deviation scales are reliable (reliabilities between 0.73 and 0.95) and sensitive to occasion‐specific fluctuations (occasion specificities between 0.38 and 0.72). The self‐perceived deviation scales show high correlations with latent occasion‐specific deviation variables defined on the basis of repeatedly measured mood states (high convergent validity). In contrast to self‐reported mood states, however, self‐perceived mood deviations show much smaller and in most cases non‐significant correlations with personality variables (high discriminant validity). Furthermore, it is shown that self‐perceived mood deviations can be used to suppress stable situation‐specific variance in mood traits defined as aggregated states. Therefore, it can be demonstrated that including self‐perceived mood deviations in analyses on mood–personality associations enhances the association coefficients considerably. Finally, the implications of the results for the individual assessment of mood deviations, as well as for studies on affect and personality, are discussed. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Do you feel better or worse? The validity of perceived deviations of mood states from mood traits</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Do you feel better or worse?</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Do you feel better or worse? The validity of perceived deviations of mood states from mood traits</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Michael</namePart><namePart type="family">Eid</namePart><affiliation>University of Trier, Germany</affiliation><affiliation>FBI—Psychologie, Universität Trier, D‐54286 Trier, Germany.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Christoph</namePart><namePart type="family">Schneider</namePart><affiliation>University of Trier, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Peter</namePart><namePart type="family">Schwenkmezger</namePart><affiliation>University of Trier, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Chichester, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1999-07</dateIssued><dateCaptured encoding="w3cdtf">1998-06-02</dateCaptured><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">1998-10-01</dateValid><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1999</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="figures">6</extent><extent unit="tables">4</extent><extent unit="references">50</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">The advantages of assessing self‐perceived deviations of mood states from mood traits in cross‐sectional as well as longitudinal studies are discussed in detail. The validity of self‐perceived mood deviations is analysed in a longitudinal study with three occasions of measurement and 176 participants. In order to assess self‐perceived mood deviations, participants rated the deviation of their momentary mood from how they felt in general with respect to 32 mood adjectives belonging to three mood scales (pleasant–unpleasant, calm–restless, awake–sleepy). Furthermore, mood states, mood traits, and other personality variables (hedonic level, neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness, conscientiousness) are assessed by self‐report. Using models of latent state–trait theory, it is shown that the self‐perceived mood deviation scales are reliable (reliabilities between 0.73 and 0.95) and sensitive to occasion‐specific fluctuations (occasion specificities between 0.38 and 0.72). The self‐perceived deviation scales show high correlations with latent occasion‐specific deviation variables defined on the basis of repeatedly measured mood states (high convergent validity). In contrast to self‐reported mood states, however, self‐perceived mood deviations show much smaller and in most cases non‐significant correlations with personality variables (high discriminant validity). Furthermore, it is shown that self‐perceived mood deviations can be used to suppress stable situation‐specific variance in mood traits defined as aggregated states. Therefore, it can be demonstrated that including self‐perceived mood deviations in analyses on mood–personality associations enhances the association coefficients considerably. Finally, the implications of the results for the individual assessment of mood deviations, as well as for studies on affect and personality, are discussed. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>European Journal of Personality</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Eur. J. Pers.</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Research Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0890-2070</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1099-0984</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0984</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">PER</identifier><part><date>1999</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>13</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>4</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>283</start><end>306</end><total>24</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">0F2C9032AB5F37F0E00EF59B32620A3A4BB33A5A</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199907/08)13:4<283::AID-PER341>3.0.CO;2-0</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">PER341</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001A28 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001A28 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Rhénanie
|area= UnivTrevesV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:0F2C9032AB5F37F0E00EF59B32620A3A4BB33A5A
|texte= Do you feel better or worse? The validity of perceived deviations of mood states from mood traits
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |