Latent state–trait theory and research in personality and individual differences
Identifieur interne : 001779 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001778; suivant : 001780Latent state–trait theory and research in personality and individual differences
Auteurs : Rolf Steyer ; Manfred Schmitt ; Michael EidSource :
- European Journal of Personality [ 0890-2070 ] ; 1999-09.
Abstract
Latent state–trait (LST) theory is a generalization of classical test theory designed to take account of the fact that psychological measurement does not take place in a situational vacuum. The basic concepts of latent state–trait theory (LST theory) are introduced. The core of LST theory consists of two decompositions: (a) the decomposition of any observed score into latent state and measurement error, and (b) the decomposition of any latent state into latent trait and latent state residual representing situational and/or interaction effects. Latent states and latent traits are defined as special conditional expectations. A score on a latent state variable is defined as the expectation of an observable variable Yik given a person in a situation whereas a score on a latent trait variable is the expectation of Yik given a person. The theory also comprises the definition of consistency, occasion specificity, reliability, and stability coefficients. An overview of different models of LST theory is given. It is shown how different research questions of personality psychology can be and have been analysed within the LST framework and why research in personality and individual differences can profit from LST theory and methodology. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Url:
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199909/10)13:5<389::AID-PER361>3.0.CO;2-A
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:EDF010D623472051E6C7A594C8C798BF096E3378Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Latent state–trait theory and research in personality and individual differences</title><author><name sortKey="Steyer, Rolf" sort="Steyer, Rolf" uniqKey="Steyer R" first="Rolf" last="Steyer">Rolf Steyer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Jena, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Fredrich‐Schiller‐Universität Jena, Institut für Psychologie, Am Steiger 3, Haus 1, D‐07743 Jena, Germany.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schmitt, Manfred" sort="Schmitt, Manfred" uniqKey="Schmitt M" first="Manfred" last="Schmitt">Manfred Schmitt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Magdeburg, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Eid, Michael" sort="Eid, Michael" uniqKey="Eid M" first="Michael" last="Eid">Michael Eid</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:EDF010D623472051E6C7A594C8C798BF096E3378</idno><date when="1999" year="1999">1999</date><idno type="doi">10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199909/10)13:5<389::AID-PER361>3.0.CO;2-A</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/EDF010D623472051E6C7A594C8C798BF096E3378/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001779</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001779</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Latent state–trait theory and research in personality and individual differences</title><author><name sortKey="Steyer, Rolf" sort="Steyer, Rolf" uniqKey="Steyer R" first="Rolf" last="Steyer">Rolf Steyer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Jena, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Fredrich‐Schiller‐Universität Jena, Institut für Psychologie, Am Steiger 3, Haus 1, D‐07743 Jena, Germany.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schmitt, Manfred" sort="Schmitt, Manfred" uniqKey="Schmitt M" first="Manfred" last="Schmitt">Manfred Schmitt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Magdeburg, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Eid, Michael" sort="Eid, Michael" uniqKey="Eid M" first="Michael" last="Eid">Michael Eid</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">European Journal of Personality</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Eur. J. Pers.</title><idno type="ISSN">0890-2070</idno><idno type="eISSN">1099-0984</idno><imprint><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1999-09">1999-09</date><biblScope unit="volume">13</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="389">389</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="408">408</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0890-2070</idno></series><idno type="istex">EDF010D623472051E6C7A594C8C798BF096E3378</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199909/10)13:5<389::AID-PER361>3.0.CO;2-A</idno><idno type="ArticleID">PER361</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0890-2070</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Latent state–trait (LST) theory is a generalization of classical test theory designed to take account of the fact that psychological measurement does not take place in a situational vacuum. The basic concepts of latent state–trait theory (LST theory) are introduced. The core of LST theory consists of two decompositions: (a) the decomposition of any observed score into latent state and measurement error, and (b) the decomposition of any latent state into latent trait and latent state residual representing situational and/or interaction effects. Latent states and latent traits are defined as special conditional expectations. A score on a latent state variable is defined as the expectation of an observable variable Yik given a person in a situation whereas a score on a latent trait variable is the expectation of Yik given a person. The theory also comprises the definition of consistency, occasion specificity, reliability, and stability coefficients. An overview of different models of LST theory is given. It is shown how different research questions of personality psychology can be and have been analysed within the LST framework and why research in personality and individual differences can profit from LST theory and methodology. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Rolf Steyer</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Jena, Germany</json:string><json:string>Fredrich‐Schiller‐Universität Jena, Institut für Psychologie, Am Steiger 3, Haus 1, D‐07743 Jena, Germany.</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Manfred Schmitt</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Magdeburg, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Michael Eid</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Trier, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>PER361</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Latent state–trait (LST) theory is a generalization of classical test theory designed to take account of the fact that psychological measurement does not take place in a situational vacuum. The basic concepts of latent state–trait theory (LST theory) are introduced. The core of LST theory consists of two decompositions: (a) the decomposition of any observed score into latent state and measurement error, and (b) the decomposition of any latent state into latent trait and latent state residual representing situational and/or interaction effects. Latent states and latent traits are defined as special conditional expectations. A score on a latent state variable is defined as the expectation of an observable variable Yik given a person in a situation whereas a score on a latent trait variable is the expectation of Yik given a person. The theory also comprises the definition of consistency, occasion specificity, reliability, and stability coefficients. An overview of different models of LST theory is given. It is shown how different research questions of personality psychology can be and have been analysed within the LST framework and why research in personality and individual differences can profit from LST theory and methodology. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.388</score><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>590 x 828 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>1286</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>9199</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>57009</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>20</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>199</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Latent state–trait theory and research in personality and individual differences</title><refBibs><json:item><author><json:item><name>I. Ajzen</name></json:item></author><host><volume>20</volume><pages><last>63</last><first>1</first></pages><author></author><title>Advances in Experimental Social Psychology</title></host><title>Attitudes, traits, and actions: dispositional prediction of behavior in personality and social psychology</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B. P. Allen</name></json:item><json:item><name>C. R. Potkay</name></json:item></author><host><volume>41</volume><pages><last>928</last><first>916</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>On the arbitrary distinction between states and traits</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B. P. Allen</name></json:item><json:item><name>C. R. Potkay</name></json:item></author><host><volume>44</volume><pages><last>1089</last><first>1087</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Just as arbitrary as ever: comments on Zuckerman's rejoinder</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality, a Psychological Interpretation, Holt, New York.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Allport, G. W. and Vernon, P. E. (1933). Studies in Expressive Movement, Macmillan, New York.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>W. P. Alston</name></json:item></author><host><volume>5</volume><pages><last>48</last><first>17</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior</title></host><title>Traits, consistency, and conceptual alternatives for personality theory</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A. Anastasi</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>356</last><first>345</first></pages><author></author><title>Principles of Modern Psychological Measurement</title></host><title>Traits, states, and situations: a comprehensive view</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Arbuckle, J. L. (1997). Amos User's Guide, SPSS, Chicago, IL.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D. J. Bem</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Allen</name></json:item></author><host><volume>81</volume><pages><last>520</last><first>506</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychological Review</title></host><title>On predicting some of the people some of the time: the search for cross‐situational consistency in behavior</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS. Structural Equations Program Manual, Multivariate, Encino, CA.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables, Wiley, New York.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>K. S. Bowers</name></json:item></author><host><volume>80</volume><pages><last>336</last><first>307</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychological Review</title></host><title>Situationism in psychology: an analysis and a critique</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L. Buse</name></json:item><json:item><name>K. Pawlik</name></json:item></author><host><volume>28</volume><pages><last>538</last><first>521</first></pages><author></author><title>Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie</title></host><title>Zur State–Trait Charakteristik verschiedener Meßvariablen der psychophysiologischen Aktivierung, der kognitiven Leistung und der Stimmung in Alltagssituationen’ [‘On the state–trait characteristic of various variables of psycho‐ physiological activation, cognitive ability, and mood in every day situations</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>H. A. Car</name></json:item><json:item><name>F. A. Kingsbury</name></json:item></author><host><volume>45</volume><pages><last>524</last><first>497</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychological Review</title></host><title>The concept of traits</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Cattell, R. B. (1946). The Description and Measurement of Personality, World, New York.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. B. Cattell</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>128</last><first>67</first></pages><author></author><title>Handbook of Multivariate Experimental Psychology</title></host><title>The data box: its ordering of total resources in terms of possible relational systems</title></json:item><json:item><host><volume>20</volume><author></author><title>Cattell, R. B. (1979). Personality and Learning Theory, Vol. 1, Springer, Berlin.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Cattell, R. B. and Scheier, I. H. (1961). The Meaning and Measurement of Neuroticism and Anxiety, Ronald, New York.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>W. F. Chaplin</name></json:item><json:item><name>O. P. John</name></json:item><json:item><name>L. R. Goldberg</name></json:item></author><host><volume>54</volume><pages><last>557</last><first>541</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Conceptions of states and traits: dimensional attributes with ideals as prototypes</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Cronbach, L. J. and Snow, R. E. (Eds) (1977). Aptitudes and Instructional Methods. A Handbook for Research on Interactions, Irvington, New York.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. Deinzer</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Steyer</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Eid</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. Notz</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. Schwenkmezger</name></json:item><json:item><name>F. Ostendorf</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Neubauer</name></json:item></author><host><volume>9</volume><pages><last>23</last><first>1</first></pages><author></author><title>European Journal of Personality</title></host><title>Situational effects in trait assessment: the FPI, NEOFFI and EPI questionnaires</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G. J. Dudycha</name></json:item></author><host><volume>29</volume><pages><last>53</last><first>1</first></pages><author></author><title>Archives of Psychology</title></host><title>An objective study of punctuality in relation to personality and achievement</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L. Dumenci</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Windle</name></json:item></author><host><volume>31</volume><pages><last>330</last><first>313</first></pages><author></author><title>Multivariate Behavioral Research</title></host><title>A latent trait–state model of adolescent depression using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies—Depression Scale</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Eid</name></json:item></author><host><volume>1</volume><pages><last>85</last><first>65</first></pages><author></author><title>Methods of Psychological Research</title></host><title>Longitudinal confirmatory factor analysis for polytomous item responses: model definition and model selection on the basis of stochastic measurement theory</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Eid</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>151</last><first>145</first></pages><author></author><title>Applications of Latent Trait and Latent Class Models in the Social Sciences</title></host><title>Happiness and satisfaction: an application of a latent state–trait model for ordinal variables</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Analyzing individual differences</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Eid</name></json:item><json:item><name>E. Diener</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>Social Indicators/Quality of Life Research Methods: Methodological Developments and Issues</title></host><title>Global judgments of subjective well‐being: situational variability and long‐term stability</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Eid</name></json:item><json:item><name>E. Diener</name></json:item></author><host><volume>76</volume><pages><last>676</last><first>662</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Intraindividual variability in affect: reliability, validity, and personality correlates</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Eid</name></json:item><json:item><name>L. Hoffmann</name></json:item></author><host><volume>23</volume><pages><last>215</last><first>193</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics</title></host><title>Measuring variability and change with an item response model for polytomous variables</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Eid</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Langeheine</name></json:item></author><host><volume>4</volume><pages><last>116</last><first>100</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychological Methods</title></host><title>Measuring consistency and occasion specificity with latent class models: a new model and its application to the measurement of affect</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Eid</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. Notz</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Steyer</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. Schwenkmezger</name></json:item></author><host><volume>16</volume><pages><last>76</last><first>63</first></pages><author></author><title>Personality and Individual Differences</title></host><title>Validating scales for the assessment of mood level and variability by latent state–trait analyses</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Eid</name></json:item><json:item><name>C. Schneider</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. Schwenkmezger</name></json:item></author><host><volume>13</volume><pages><last>306</last><first>283</first></pages><author></author><title>European Journal of Personality</title></host><title>Do you feel better or worse? On the validity of perceived deviations of mood states from mood traits</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>N. S. Endler</name></json:item><json:item><name>JMcV Hunt</name></json:item></author><host><volume>65</volume><pages><last>346</last><first>336</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychological Bulletin</title></host><title>Sources of behavioral variance as measured by the S–R Inventory of Anxiousness</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Endler, N. S. and Magnusson, D. (Eds) (1976). Interactional Psychology and Personality, Wiley, New York.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S. Epstein</name></json:item></author><host><volume>37</volume><pages><last>1126</last><first>1097</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>The stability of behavior: I. On predicting most of the people much of the time</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S. Epstein</name></json:item></author><host><volume>35</volume><pages><last>806</last><first>790</first></pages><author></author><title>American Psychologist</title></host><title>The stability of behavior: II. Implications for psychological research</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S. Epstein</name></json:item></author><host><volume>30</volume><pages><last>154</last><first>91</first></pages><author></author><title>Nebraska Symposium on Motivation</title></host><title>A research paradigm for the study of personality and emotions</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S. Epstein</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>268</last><first>209</first></pages><author></author><title>Personality and the Prediction of Behavior</title></host><title>The stability of behavior across time and situations</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S. Epstein</name></json:item><json:item><name>E. O'Brien</name></json:item></author><host><volume>98</volume><pages><last>537</last><first>513</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychological Bulletin</title></host><title>The person–situation debate in historical and current perspective</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Eysenck, H. J. (1947). Dimensions of Personality, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>H. J. Eysenck</name></json:item></author><host><volume>38</volume><pages><last>115</last><first>114</first></pages><author></author><title>American Psychologist</title></host><title>Cicero and the state–trait theory of anxiety: another case of delayed recognition</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Guilford, J. P. (1959). Personality, McGraw‐Hill, New York.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>EEG trait asymmetry and affective style I: the latent state and trait structure of resting asymmetry scores</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Hartshorne, H. and May M. A. (1928). Studies in the Nature of Character, Vol. 1: Studies in Deceit, Macmillan, New York.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C. Hertzog</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. R. Nesselroade</name></json:item></author><host><volume>58</volume><pages><last>109</last><first>93</first></pages><author></author><title>Child Development</title></host><title>Beyond autoregressive models: some implications of the trait–state distinction for the structural modeling of developmental change</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. C. Johnson</name></json:item><json:item><name>G. E. McClearn</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. Yuen</name></json:item><json:item><name>C. T. Nagoshi</name></json:item><json:item><name>F. M. Ahern</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. E. Cole</name></json:item></author><host><volume>40</volume><pages><last>892</last><first>875</first></pages><author></author><title>American Psychologist</title></host><title>Galton's data a century later</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Jöreskog, K. G. and Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8. Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language, Scientific Software, Chicago, IL.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D. A. Kenny</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Zautra</name></json:item></author><host><volume>63</volume><pages><last>59</last><first>52</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology</title></host><title>The state–trait error model for multiwave data</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C. Kirschbaum</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Steyer</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Eid</name></json:item><json:item><name>U. Patalla</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. Schwenkmezger</name></json:item><json:item><name>D. H. Hellhammer</name></json:item></author><host><volume>15</volume><pages><last>307</last><first>297</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychoneuroendocrinology</title></host><title>Cortisol and behavior: 2. Application of a latent state–trait model to salivary cortisol</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Lord, F. M. and Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores, Addison‐Wesley, Reading, MA.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>H. W. Marsh</name></json:item><json:item><name>D. Grayson</name></json:item></author><host><volume>1</volume><pages><last>145</last><first>116</first></pages><author></author><title>Structural Equation Modeling</title></host><title>Longitudinal confirmatory factor analysis: common, time‐specific, item‐specific, and residual‐error components of variance</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Matthews, G. and Deary, I. J. (1998). Personality Traits, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Mischel, W. (1998). Personality and Assessment, Wiley, New York.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>W. Mischel</name></json:item></author><host><volume>80</volume><pages><last>283</last><first>252</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychological Review</title></host><title>Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Muthén, L. and Muthén, B. (1998). Mplus User's Guide, Muthén and Muthén, Los Angeles.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. R. Nesselroade</name></json:item><json:item><name>T. W. Bartsch</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>238</last><first>221</first></pages><author></author><title>Handbook of Modern Personality Theory</title></host><title>Multivariate perspectives on the construct validity of the trait–state distinction</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Newcomb, T. M. (1929). Consistency of Certain Extrovert–Introvert Behavior Patterns in 51 Problem Boys, Columbia University, Teachers College, Bureau of Publications, New York.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. R. Novick</name></json:item></author><host><volume>3</volume><pages><last>18</last><first>1</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Mathematical Psychology</title></host><title>The axioms and principal results of classical test theory</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. Ormel</name></json:item><json:item><name>W. B. Schaufeli</name></json:item></author><host><volume>60</volume><pages><last>299</last><first>288</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Stability and change in psychological distress and their relationship with self‐esteem and locus of control: a dynamic equilibrium model</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>I. G. Sarason</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. E. Smith</name></json:item><json:item><name>E. Diener</name></json:item></author><host><volume>32</volume><pages><last>204</last><first>199</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Personality research: components of variance attributable to the person and the situation</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Schmitt</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>European Journal of Psychological Assessment</title></host><title>Mother–daughter attachment and family cohesion: single and multi construct latent state–trait models of current and retrospective perceptions</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Schmitt</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. Borkenau</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>55</last><first>29</first></pages><author></author><title>Modern Personality Psychology. Critical Reviews and New Directions</title></host><title>The consistency of personality</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Schmitt</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Maes</name></json:item></author><host><volume>11</volume><pages><last>78</last><first>59</first></pages><author></author><title>Social Justice Research</title></host><title>Perceived injustice in unified Germany and mental health</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Schmitt</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. H. Schwartz</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Steyer</name></json:item><json:item><name>T. Schmitt</name></json:item></author><host><volume>9</volume><pages><last>121</last><first>107</first></pages><author></author><title>European Journal of Psychological Assessment</title></host><title>Measurement models for the Schwartz Values Inventory</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Self‐reports on life satisfaction: to what extent do they reflect a stable trait versus systematic situational effects?</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Schmitt</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Steyer</name></json:item></author><host><volume>14</volume><pages><last>529</last><first>519</first></pages><author></author><title>Personality and Individual Differences</title></host><title>A latent state–trait model (not only) for social desirability</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>N. Schwarz</name></json:item><json:item><name>F. Strack</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>Foundations of Hedonic Psychology: Scientific Perspectives on Enjoyment and Suffering</title></host><title>Reports of subjective well‐being: judgemental processes and their methodological implications</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Snyder</name></json:item><json:item><name>W. Ickes</name></json:item></author><host><volume>2</volume><pages><last>947</last><first>883</first></pages><author></author><title>Handbook of Social Psychology</title></host><title>Personality and social behavior</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C. D. Spielberger</name></json:item></author><host><volume>1</volume><pages><last>49</last><first>23</first></pages><author></author><title>Anxiety: Current Trends in Theory and Research</title></host><title>Anxiety as an emotional state</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Spielberger, C. D. (1983). Manual for the State–Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI Form Y), Consulting Psychologists, Palo Alto, CA.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. Steyer</name></json:item></author><host><volume>3</volume><pages><last>60</last><first>25</first></pages><author></author><title>Methodika</title></host><title>Models of classical psychometric test theory as stochastic measurement models: representation, uniqueness, meaningfulness, identifiability, and testability</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. Steyer</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Logic of Inquiry and Research Design</title></host><title>Classical test theory</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. Steyer</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Eid</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. Schwenkmezger</name></json:item></author><host><volume>2</volume><pages><last>33</last><first>21</first></pages><author></author><title>Methods of Psychological Research—Online</title></host><title>Modeling true intraindividual change: true change as a latent variable</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. Steyer</name></json:item><json:item><name>D. Ferring</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Schmitt</name></json:item></author><host><volume>2</volume><pages><last>98</last><first>79</first></pages><author></author><title>European Journal of Psychological Assessment</title></host><title>States and traits in psychological assessment</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. Steyer</name></json:item><json:item><name>A.‐M. Majcen</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. Schwenkmezger</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Buchner</name></json:item></author><host><volume>1</volume><pages><last>299</last><first>281</first></pages><author></author><title>Anxiety Research</title></host><title>A latent state–trait anxiety model and its application to determine consistency and specificity coefficients</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. Steyer</name></json:item><json:item><name>I. Partchev</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Shanahan</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>Modeling Longitudinal and Multiple‐Group Data: Practical Issues, Applied Approaches, and Specific Examples</title></host><title>Modeling true intra‐individual change in structural equation models: the case of poverty and children's psychosocial adjustment?</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. Steyer</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. J. Schmitt</name></json:item></author><host><volume>4</volume><pages><last>94</last><first>58</first></pages><author></author><title>Methodika</title></host><title>The effects of aggregation across and within occasions on consistency, specificity, and reliability</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. Steyer</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. J. Schmitt</name></json:item></author><host><volume>24</volume><pages><last>445</last><first>427</first></pages><author></author><title>Quality and Quantity</title></host><title>Latent state–trait models in attitude research</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. Steyer</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. Schwenkmezger</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Auer</name></json:item></author><host><volume>11</volume><pages><last>134</last><first>125</first></pages><author></author><title>Personality and Individual Differences</title></host><title>The emotional and cognitive components of trait anxiety: a latent state–trait model</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Der Mehrdimensionale Befindlichkeitsfragebogen (MDBF) [Multidimensional Mood Questionnaire]</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Assessment of domain‐specificity in school‐related Likert‐type inventories</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L. L. Thurstone</name></json:item></author><host><volume>26</volume><pages><last>269</last><first>249</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology</title></host><title>The measurement of social attitudes</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Thurstone, L. L. and Chave, E. J. (1929). The Measurement of Attitude, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. C. Wright</name></json:item><json:item><name>W. Mischel</name></json:item></author><host><volume>53</volume><pages><last>1177</last><first>1159</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>A conditional approach to dispositional constructs: the local predictability of social behavior</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D. W. Zimmerman</name></json:item></author><host><volume>40</volume><pages><last>412</last><first>395</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychometrika</title></host><title>Probability spaces, Hilbert spaces, and the axioms of test theory</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D. W. Zimmerman</name></json:item></author><host><volume>36</volume><pages><last>96</last><first>85</first></pages><author></author><title>Educational and Psychological Measurement</title></host><title>Test theory with minimal assumptions</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Zuckerman</name></json:item></author><host><volume>44</volume><pages><last>1086</last><first>1083</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>The distinction between trait and state scales is not arbitrary: comment on Allen and Potkay's “On the arbitrary distinction between states and traits”</title></json:item></refBibs><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>13</volume><publisherId><json:string>PER</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>20</total><last>408</last><first>389</first></pages><issn><json:string>0890-2070</json:string></issn><issue>5</issue><author><json:item><name>Iven Van Mechelen</name></json:item><json:item><name>Boele De Raad</name></json:item></author><subject><json:item><value>Research Article</value></json:item></subject><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1099-0984</json:string></eissn><title>European Journal of Personality</title><doi><json:string>10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0984</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>social science</json:string><json:string>psychology, social</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>health sciences</json:string><json:string>psychology & cognitive sciences</json:string><json:string>social psychology</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>1999</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1999</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199909/10)13:5>389::AID-PER361>3.0.CO;2-A</json:string></doi><id>EDF010D623472051E6C7A594C8C798BF096E3378</id><score>0.82534266</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/EDF010D623472051E6C7A594C8C798BF096E3378/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/EDF010D623472051E6C7A594C8C798BF096E3378/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/EDF010D623472051E6C7A594C8C798BF096E3378/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Latent state–trait theory and research in personality and individual differences</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p></availability><date>1999</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Latent state–trait theory and research in personality and individual differences</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Rolf</forename><surname>Steyer</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Jena, Germany</affiliation><affiliation>Fredrich‐Schiller‐Universität Jena, Institut für Psychologie, Am Steiger 3, Haus 1, D‐07743 Jena, Germany.</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">Manfred</forename><surname>Schmitt</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Magdeburg, Germany</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-3"><persName><forename type="first">Michael</forename><surname>Eid</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Trier, Germany</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">European Journal of Personality</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Eur. J. Pers.</title><idno type="pISSN">0890-2070</idno><idno type="eISSN">1099-0984</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0984</idno><imprint><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1999-09"></date><biblScope unit="volume">13</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="389">389</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="408">408</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">EDF010D623472051E6C7A594C8C798BF096E3378</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199909/10)13:5<389::AID-PER361>3.0.CO;2-A</idno><idno type="ArticleID">PER361</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1999</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Latent state–trait (LST) theory is a generalization of classical test theory designed to take account of the fact that psychological measurement does not take place in a situational vacuum. The basic concepts of latent state–trait theory (LST theory) are introduced. The core of LST theory consists of two decompositions: (a) the decomposition of any observed score into latent state and measurement error, and (b) the decomposition of any latent state into latent trait and latent state residual representing situational and/or interaction effects. Latent states and latent traits are defined as special conditional expectations. A score on a latent state variable is defined as the expectation of an observable variable Yik given a person in a situation whereas a score on a latent trait variable is the expectation of Yik given a person. The theory also comprises the definition of consistency, occasion specificity, reliability, and stability coefficients. An overview of different models of LST theory is given. It is shown how different research questions of personality psychology can be and have been analysed within the LST framework and why research in personality and individual differences can profit from LST theory and methodology. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="Journal Subject"><list><head>article-category</head><item><term>Research Article</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1999-09">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/EDF010D623472051E6C7A594C8C798BF096E3378/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisherName><publisherLoc>Chichester, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi registered="yes">10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0984</doi><issn type="print">0890-2070</issn><issn type="electronic">1099-0984</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="PER"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" xml:lang="en" sort="EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY">European Journal of Personality</title><title type="short">Eur. J. Pers.</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="50"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199909/10)13:5<>1.0.CO;2-P</doi><titleGroup><title type="specialIssueTitle">Personality and Situations</title></titleGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="13">13</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">5</numbering></numberingGroup><creators><creator xml:id="sped1" creatorRole="sponsoringEditor"><personName><givenNames>Iven</givenNames><familyName>Van Mechelen</familyName></personName></creator><creator xml:id="sped2" creatorRole="sponsoringEditor"><personName><givenNames>Boele</givenNames><familyName>De Raad</familyName></personName></creator></creators><coverDate startDate="1999-09">September/October 1999</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="4" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199909/10)13:5<389::AID-PER361>3.0.CO;2-A</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="PER361"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="20"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Research Article</title><title type="tocHeading1">Research Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="1999-10-06"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="1999-10-06"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:JWSART34_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-03-06"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-02-06"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">389</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">408</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Fredrich‐Schiller‐Universität Jena, Institut für Psychologie, Am Steiger 3, Haus 1, D‐07743 Jena, Germany.</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:PER.PER361.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="2"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="3"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="87"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" xml:lang="en">Latent state–trait theory and research in personality and individual differences</title><title type="short" xml:lang="en">Latent state–trait theory</title></titleGroup><creators><creator xml:id="au1" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Rolf</givenNames><familyName>Steyer</familyName></personName></creator><creator xml:id="au2" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af2"><personName><givenNames>Manfred</givenNames><familyName>Schmitt</familyName></personName></creator><creator xml:id="au3" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af3"><personName><givenNames>Michael</givenNames><familyName>Eid</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="af1" countryCode="DE" type="organization"><unparsedAffiliation>University of Jena, Germany</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="af2" countryCode="DE" type="organization"><unparsedAffiliation>University of Magdeburg, Germany</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="af3" countryCode="DE" type="organization"><unparsedAffiliation>University of Trier, Germany</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p>Latent state–trait (LST) theory is a generalization of classical test theory designed to take account of the fact that psychological measurement does not take place in a situational vacuum. The basic concepts of latent state–trait theory (LST theory) are introduced. The core of LST theory consists of two decompositions: (a) the decomposition of any observed score into latent state and measurement error, and (b) the decomposition of any latent state into latent trait and latent state residual representing situational and/or interaction effects. Latent states and latent traits are defined as special conditional expectations. A score on a latent state variable is defined as the expectation of an observable variable Y<sub>ik</sub> given a person in a situation whereas a score on a latent trait variable is the expectation of Y<sub>ik</sub> given a person. The theory also comprises the definition of consistency, occasion specificity, reliability, and stability coefficients. An overview of different models of LST theory is given. It is shown how different research questions of personality psychology can be and have been analysed within the LST framework and why research in personality and individual differences can profit from LST theory and methodology. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Latent state–trait theory and research in personality and individual differences</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Latent state–trait theory</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Latent state–trait theory and research in personality and individual differences</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Rolf</namePart><namePart type="family">Steyer</namePart><affiliation>University of Jena, Germany</affiliation><affiliation>Fredrich‐Schiller‐Universität Jena, Institut für Psychologie, Am Steiger 3, Haus 1, D‐07743 Jena, Germany.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Manfred</namePart><namePart type="family">Schmitt</namePart><affiliation>University of Magdeburg, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Michael</namePart><namePart type="family">Eid</namePart><affiliation>University of Trier, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Chichester, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1999-09</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1999</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="figures">2</extent><extent unit="tables">3</extent><extent unit="references">87</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Latent state–trait (LST) theory is a generalization of classical test theory designed to take account of the fact that psychological measurement does not take place in a situational vacuum. The basic concepts of latent state–trait theory (LST theory) are introduced. The core of LST theory consists of two decompositions: (a) the decomposition of any observed score into latent state and measurement error, and (b) the decomposition of any latent state into latent trait and latent state residual representing situational and/or interaction effects. Latent states and latent traits are defined as special conditional expectations. A score on a latent state variable is defined as the expectation of an observable variable Yik given a person in a situation whereas a score on a latent trait variable is the expectation of Yik given a person. The theory also comprises the definition of consistency, occasion specificity, reliability, and stability coefficients. An overview of different models of LST theory is given. It is shown how different research questions of personality psychology can be and have been analysed within the LST framework and why research in personality and individual differences can profit from LST theory and methodology. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>European Journal of Personality</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Eur. J. Pers.</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Iven</namePart><namePart type="family">Van Mechelen</namePart></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Boele</namePart><namePart type="family">De Raad</namePart></name><genre type="journal">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Research Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0890-2070</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1099-0984</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0984</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">PER</identifier><part><date>1999</date><detail type="title"><title>Personality and Situations</title></detail><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>13</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>5</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>389</start><end>408</end><total>20</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">EDF010D623472051E6C7A594C8C798BF096E3378</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199909/10)13:5<389::AID-PER361>3.0.CO;2-A</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">PER361</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001779 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001779 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Rhénanie
|area= UnivTrevesV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:EDF010D623472051E6C7A594C8C798BF096E3378
|texte= Latent state–trait theory and research in personality and individual differences
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |